Hey, I thought you loved it when people got all geeky :) -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Laura A. Robinson Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 6:39 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: OT: RE: RE: [ActiveDir] Split pagefile
I was out eating turkey. You people were reading the list? Dang, that's dedication! > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Brunson > Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 5:22 PM > To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org > Subject: RE: RE: [ActiveDir] Split pagefile > > I think Susan brought this up last week or so. Here's the > link she gave. I can't find the original post.... > http://blogs.technet.com/petergal/archive/2006/03/23/422993.aspx > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Laura A. > Robinson > Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 2:21 PM > To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org > Subject: OT: RE: [ActiveDir] Split pagefile > > You know, you can actually do your own crashdump analysis. We > even used to teach people how to do it back in the NT4 days. > I loved that class. :-D > > Laura > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Hoehn > > Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 2:15 PM > > To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org > > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Split pagefile > > > > Hi, > > Best practice used to be to put the pagefile on a > different BUS than > > the OS. The idea is that you can read/write to both the OS > and the PF > > at the same time. We always put the entire PF on a separate > bus/drive > > in it's own partition. That way you have the added speed of a bus > > apart from the OS bus and a contiguous PF. We never bothered with a > > C: swapfile because we could never afford to send the dump > to M$ for > > decryption. :-} > > > > Don > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ramon Linan > > Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 11:07 AM > > To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org > > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Split pagefile > > > > Hi, > > > > I have an answer and a question about the same. > > > > Most of my servers have 2 partition, one for the OS and the > other for > > data, I always put the pagefile in the data partition, so > yes, you can > > have the have the whole thing in a different partition or > hard drive. > > > > Actually, Linux system always create a swap partition just for that > > purpose, so I wonder if it would be more efficient to > always create a > > partition just for the pagefile... Anyone knows? > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Larry Wahlers > > Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 12:09 PM > > To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org > > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Split pagefile > > > > Sorry for the reply to my own post, but this article: > > > > http://www.windowsnetworking.com/kbase/WindowsTips/Windows2003 > > /AdminTips > > /Miscellaneous/EnhancePerformancebyMovingthePagefile.html > > > > says I can move the whole thing to a different partition. > > I'll leave a meg on the C drive just for the dumpfile, > which we limit > > to 64K, in case the system crashes and I can actually > figure out how > > to read the dumpfile. > > > > But, really, is it OK to leave absolutely NO pagefile on C:/? > > We normally leave at least 200Mb on the C: partition when > we move the > > rest to a different drive. > > > > > > -- > > Larry Wahlers > > Concordia Technologies > > The Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod > > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > direct office line: (314) 996-1876 > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > > Behalf Of > > > > Larry Wahlers > > > > Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 9:55 AM > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: Split pagefile > > > > > > > > Colleagues, > > > > > > > > Is there a best practice for splitting the pagefile on > > Exchange 2003 > > > > across multiple drives? My C drive is up to nearly 9GB > > used out of > > > > 10GB, and I'd like to move off most of the 3GB pagefile > > to maybe the > > > > database drive. We have only 500 users on that system, so > > > performance shouldn't > > > > be too much of an issue. > > > > > > > > Thanks in advance, folks. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Larry Wahlers > > > > Concordia Technologies > > > > The Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod > > > > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > direct office line: (314) 996-1876 > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > > List posting FAQ: > http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > > Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/read/?forum=exchange > > > > To subscribe: > > > http://e-newsletters.internet.com/discussionlists.html/ > > > > To unsubscribe send a blank email to > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: > > > > Jupitermedia Corp. > > > > Attn: Discussion List Management > > > > 475 Park Avenue South > > > > New York, NY 10016 > > > > > > > > Please include the email address which you have been > > contacted with. > > > > > > > > > > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx > > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx > > List archive: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir@mail.activedir.org/ > > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx > > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx > > List archive: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir@mail.activedir.org/ > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email > Security System. > > For more information please visit > > http://www.messagelabs.com/email > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > > > > > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx > > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx > > List archive: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir@mail.activedir.org/ > > > > -- > > No virus found in this incoming message. > > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > > Version: 7.5.430 / Virus Database: 268.15.2/559 - Release > > Date: 11/30/2006 5:07 AM > > > > > > -- > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.430 / Virus Database: 268.15.2/559 - Release Date: > 11/30/2006 > 5:07 AM > > > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx > List archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir@mail.activedir.org/ > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx > List archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir@mail.activedir.org/ > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.430 / Virus Database: 268.15.2/559 - Release > Date: 11/30/2006 5:07 AM > > -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.430 / Virus Database: 268.15.2/559 - Release Date: 11/30/2006 5:07 AM List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir@mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir@mail.activedir.org/
