Re: OpenWire.Net is feature complete
I'm wondering if its a firewall issue blocking the SSH port (443 I think). I've just ran that command fine... svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/activemq/trunk/ You could try to use http for an anonymous checkout. svn co http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/activemq/trunk/ which should use port 80 to avoid any firewall issues On 28 Feb 2006, at 14:12, Mittler, Nathan wrote: I'm having problems checking out from svn (in cygwin) ... bash-3.00$ svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/activemq/trunk/ svn: PROPFIND request failed on '/repos/asf/incubator/activemq/trunk' svn: PROPFIND of '/repos/asf/incubator/activemq/trunk': could not connect to server (https://svn.apache.org) I've also tried svn://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/activemq/ trunk/ I haven't ruled out that it's an internal firewall issue yet, but I can browse the repository in firefox without issue. Any ideas? Regards, Nate -Original Message- From: James Strachan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 7:49 AM To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: OpenWire.Net is feature complete Just a heads up. OpenWire.Net now supports JMS transactions along with all the various forms of Receive*() and asynchronous receive (using a MessageListener) so its pretty much feature complete. More info here http://docs.codehaus.org/display/ACTIVEMQ/OpenWire+dotNet It could use more testing and test cases to ensure that all the features are complete; the transaction tests are quite good but we could use some more tests. Currently OpenWire.Net supports all of the JMS features apart from XA support (which requires integration with MS DTC). James --- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/ James --- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
RE: OpenWire.Net is feature complete
I'm having problems checking out from svn (in cygwin) ... bash-3.00$ svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/activemq/trunk/ svn: PROPFIND request failed on '/repos/asf/incubator/activemq/trunk' svn: PROPFIND of '/repos/asf/incubator/activemq/trunk': could not connect to server (https://svn.apache.org) I've also tried svn://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/activemq/trunk/ I haven't ruled out that it's an internal firewall issue yet, but I can browse the repository in firefox without issue. Any ideas? Regards, Nate -Original Message- From: James Strachan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 7:49 AM To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: OpenWire.Net is feature complete Just a heads up. OpenWire.Net now supports JMS transactions along with all the various forms of Receive*() and asynchronous receive (using a MessageListener) so its pretty much feature complete. More info here http://docs.codehaus.org/display/ACTIVEMQ/OpenWire+dotNet It could use more testing and test cases to ensure that all the features are complete; the transaction tests are quite good but we could use some more tests. Currently OpenWire.Net supports all of the JMS features apart from XA support (which requires integration with MS DTC). James --- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
OpenWire.Net is feature complete
Just a heads up. OpenWire.Net now supports JMS transactions along with all the various forms of Receive*() and asynchronous receive (using a MessageListener) so its pretty much feature complete. More info here http://docs.codehaus.org/display/ACTIVEMQ/OpenWire+dotNet It could use more testing and test cases to ensure that all the features are complete; the transaction tests are quite good but we could use some more tests. Currently OpenWire.Net supports all of the JMS features apart from XA support (which requires integration with MS DTC). James --- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
Re: [activemq-user] Network of Brokers ...
Hi John, yes it should! well spotted :) cheers, Rob On 27 Feb 2006, at 19:00, John Heitmann wrote: On Feb 27, 2006, at 12:44 AM, Rob Davies wrote: ActiveMQ tags messages with the brokers the message has passed through - so messages can be filtered out before they are sent to a broker that message has already visited Should the first if clause of org.apache.activemq.network.DemandForwardingBridge.matchesForwardingFi lter() have an explicit 'return false;'? It looks like it logs the loop but doesn't filter it (I haven't watched this path in action though, it might do the right thing in practice). John
