Re: activemq architecture with jboss
On 8/16/06, masien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, Execuse me but i am new in JMS and ActiveMQ... I'd like to create an architecture with a client that send messages to 2 brokers (in cluster) and a MDB that consume the messages. Must I use JBOSS for use MDB? MDBs are supported by all J2EE application servers so you can take your pick there. Also there are Message Driven POJOs if you don't want to go the J2EE route http://jencks.org/Message+Driven+POJOs In this case, must i have two instance of Jboss in order to avoid the single point of failure? That is a good road??? Help me...it is very important. Whether you use 1 broker or 2 in a cluster - I recommend running multiple JVMs preferably on different boxes of the JMS clients (the producers and consumers). Whether you use Tomcat or JBoss or just a regular JVM is your call, whatever you are comfortable with. -- James --- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
Re: activemq architecture with jboss
When I configure two instance of JBOSS...must to point each instance to each ActiveMQ broker ? P.S. The client producer is on another jvm and it send messages to brokers that are on other two virtual machine. Max -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/activemq-architecture-with-jboss-tf2118066.html#a5848392 Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev forum at Nabble.com.
Re: activemq architecture with jboss
On 8/17/06, masien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When I configure two instance of JBOSS...must to point each instance to each ActiveMQ broker ? P.S. The client producer is on another jvm and it send messages to brokers that are on other two virtual machine. If you have 2 JBoss servers hosting MDBs then you might as well just run a single ActveMQ broker separately and have everyone talk to the same broker for simplicity. If you want full HA you might then consider running that broker as a pair of master/slaves. http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/masterslave.html -- James --- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
