silo is audited when checking in tape
TSM: 3.7.3 System: Solaris 2.6 (Ultra 2) Library: Sun/ATL 7/3500 I have a problem where the Silo audits the entire library after I send a command to checkin a tape, specifically after the "reply xx" command. The command sent: checkin libvolume dltlib bqyXXX status=private (then, after being prompted, a "reply xx") It will do a barcode check on all the tapes in the silo then physically check in the tape. No errors from the system, silo or TSM, just a 5 minute wait. It only started happening recently, I'm not sure if it's a problem seen before or a hardware fault (I'm sure Sun will contest it is a problem with the Application) Anyone seen this one Cheers, Suad -- ITSS Operations University of Auckland
Re: Client Code Level
Check the README file on each (server and client); should find both combinations are okay, but... occasionally, there's no turning back once you move up to a newer level. You can (almost always) migrate upward either client or server, on independent schedules; I have never seen (since v.1!) a co-req of client level to server level --- the one possible exception might be HSM support --- but never the base service components. Again, read the README file, very carefully... this is (like others) where the devil is in the details!!! Hope this helps. -Original Message- From: Gerald Wichmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 2:43 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Client Code Level What combinations of client/server code are acceptable? Is it ok to run 4.1.1 client code and backup to a 3.7.x server? Is it ok to run 3.7.x client code and 4.1.x server code? I guess it's a two-fold question. What is supported by Tivoli? What works in practice?
Client Code Level
What combinations of client/server code are acceptable? Is it ok to run 4.1.1 client code and backup to a 3.7.x server? Is it ok to run 3.7.x client code and 4.1.x server code? I guess its a two-fold question. What is supported by Tivoli? What works in practice?
Re: ADSM messages
This is on TSM/ADSM client, I was told by one of the contractor who did the NT installation, that, we need to delet "performace key" out of NT registray. He said, it is descripted in NT build doc. Rosa "Cook, Dwight E" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 10/30/2000 03:31:20 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: ADSM messages is this on a server or client ? could it be linked with accounting data ? is accounting on ? do you have space for the file ? just off the top of my head later, Dwight -Original Message- From: Rosa Leung/Toronto/IBM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 2:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ADSM messages Does anyone knowing the problem attached? Thanks. Rosa Leung Distributed Storage Services Tel: (416) 490-5151 Fax: (416) 490-5283 [EMAIL PROTECTED] BK02/245/TOR _ IBM Global Services -- Forwarded by Rosa Leung/Toronto/IBM on 10/30/2000 03:00 PM --- Rick Kylie 10/30/2000 02:46 PM To: Rosa Leung/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA cc: From: Rick Kylie/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA Subject: ADSM messages Hi RosaHave u ever seen any problems like the one below... Let me know. Thanks Rick Kylie Team Leader Storage Management Services 245 Consumers Road M2J 1R3 ON Tel: (416) 490-2121 Fax: (416) 490-5283 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Loc: BK02/Con/245/TOR -- Forwarded by Rick Kylie/Toronto/IBM on 10/30/2000 02:44 PM --- Susie Lau 10/30/2000 10:46 AM To: Rick Kylie/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA cc: From: Susie Lau/Toronto/IBM@ibmca Subject: ADSM messages Rick: the NT application log is dtill flooding with the following messages Event ID :3002 Source ADSM Client Description: Create failed for the ADSM client performance counter thread list mutex. The mutex name is in the attached data Event ID : 1008 Source: Perflib Description: The Open Procedure for service "ADSM Client Performance" in DLL "dsmcperf.dll" failed. Performance data for this serice will not be available.Status returned is DWORD 0. Please investigate Susie Lau Tel: (416) 490-2125 Fax: (416) 490-2335 [EMAIL PROTECTED] BK03/NJ2/251/TOR _ IBM Global Services
APAR Database
This is an easy one I'm sure, so easy in fact I can't find the answer because it's just in front of my face somewhere. I can't find a link to the APAR database, can someone please point me there. Thanks, Geoff Gill NT Systems Support Engineer SAIC Computer Systems Group E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (858) 826-4062 Pager: (888) 997-9614
Re: ADSM messages
Hi. You can find an answer in the searchable archives at: http://msgs.adsm.org/cgi-bin/get/adsm9907/603.html You might also try http://msgs.adsm.org/cgi-bin/get/adsm0010/784.html Alex Paschal Storage Administrator Freightliner, LLC (503) 745-6850 phone/vmail -Original Message- From: Rosa Leung/Toronto/IBM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 12:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ADSM messages Does anyone knowing the problem attached? Thanks. Rosa Leung Distributed Storage Services Tel: (416) 490-5151 Fax: (416) 490-5283 [EMAIL PROTECTED] BK02/245/TOR _ IBM Global Services -- Forwarded by Rosa Leung/Toronto/IBM on 10/30/2000 03:00 PM --- Rick Kylie 10/30/2000 02:46 PM To: Rosa Leung/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA cc: From: Rick Kylie/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA Subject: ADSM messages Hi RosaHave u ever seen any problems like the one below... Let me know. Thanks Rick Kylie Team Leader Storage Management Services 245 Consumers Road M2J 1R3 ON Tel: (416) 490-2121 Fax: (416) 490-5283 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Loc: BK02/Con/245/TOR -- Forwarded by Rick Kylie/Toronto/IBM on 10/30/2000 02:44 PM --- Susie Lau 10/30/2000 10:46 AM To: Rick Kylie/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA cc: From: Susie Lau/Toronto/IBM@ibmca Subject: ADSM messages Rick: the NT application log is dtill flooding with the following messages Event ID :3002 Source ADSM Client Description: Create failed for the ADSM client performance counter thread list mutex. The mutex name is in the attached data Event ID : 1008 Source: Perflib Description: The Open Procedure for service "ADSM Client Performance" in DLL "dsmcperf.dll" failed. Performance data for this serice will not be available.Status returned is DWORD 0. Please investigate Susie Lau Tel: (416) 490-2125 Fax: (416) 490-2335 [EMAIL PROTECTED] BK03/NJ2/251/TOR _ IBM Global Services
multiple nodes in a single client
Hi all. Can anybody show me how to configure multiple nodes in a single box? I know that it is possible but I couldn't find enough information in guides or redbooks so far. I have a 3.7.2 server in an AIX machine and 3.7.2 clients in AIX and Solaris boxes. What I want to do is to start more than one schedule per client, each one using a different inclexcl file and logging to a different schedule log file. Thanks in advance -- Sergio R. Cherchyk Arquitectura Tecnológica - Midrange Banco Río de la Plata S.A. - Grupo BSCH Mire 480, 2do piso - 1036 Cap. Fed. Argentina Tel. (054)-11-4341-1643 Fax. (054)-11-4341-1264
Bytes backed up
Hi Can someone tell me why i am getting conflicting information when i check no. of bytes transferred (within the q actlog cmd) as supposed to the dsmaccnt.log for nightly backups. Please shed some light Thanks
Re: ADSM messages
>Description: The Open Procedure for service "ADSM Client Performance" in >DLL "dsmcperf.dll" failed. When reporting problems, please include your product level. This may have to do with APAR IC24370: see that for details. Richard Sims, BU
Re: ADSM messages
is this on a server or client ? could it be linked with accounting data ? is accounting on ? do you have space for the file ? just off the top of my head later, Dwight -Original Message- From: Rosa Leung/Toronto/IBM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 2:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ADSM messages Does anyone knowing the problem attached? Thanks. Rosa Leung Distributed Storage Services Tel: (416) 490-5151 Fax: (416) 490-5283 [EMAIL PROTECTED] BK02/245/TOR _ IBM Global Services -- Forwarded by Rosa Leung/Toronto/IBM on 10/30/2000 03:00 PM --- Rick Kylie 10/30/2000 02:46 PM To: Rosa Leung/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA cc: From: Rick Kylie/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA Subject: ADSM messages Hi RosaHave u ever seen any problems like the one below... Let me know. Thanks Rick Kylie Team Leader Storage Management Services 245 Consumers Road M2J 1R3 ON Tel: (416) 490-2121 Fax: (416) 490-5283 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Loc: BK02/Con/245/TOR -- Forwarded by Rick Kylie/Toronto/IBM on 10/30/2000 02:44 PM --- Susie Lau 10/30/2000 10:46 AM To: Rick Kylie/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA cc: From: Susie Lau/Toronto/IBM@ibmca Subject: ADSM messages Rick: the NT application log is dtill flooding with the following messages Event ID :3002 Source ADSM Client Description: Create failed for the ADSM client performance counter thread list mutex. The mutex name is in the attached data Event ID : 1008 Source: Perflib Description: The Open Procedure for service "ADSM Client Performance" in DLL "dsmcperf.dll" failed. Performance data for this serice will not be available.Status returned is DWORD 0. Please investigate Susie Lau Tel: (416) 490-2125 Fax: (416) 490-2335 [EMAIL PROTECTED] BK03/NJ2/251/TOR _ IBM Global Services
ADSM messages
Does anyone knowing the problem attached? Thanks. Rosa Leung Distributed Storage Services Tel: (416) 490-5151 Fax: (416) 490-5283 [EMAIL PROTECTED] BK02/245/TOR _ IBM Global Services -- Forwarded by Rosa Leung/Toronto/IBM on 10/30/2000 03:00 PM --- Rick Kylie 10/30/2000 02:46 PM To: Rosa Leung/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA cc: From: Rick Kylie/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA Subject: ADSM messages Hi RosaHave u ever seen any problems like the one below... Let me know. Thanks Rick Kylie Team Leader Storage Management Services 245 Consumers Road M2J 1R3 ON Tel: (416) 490-2121 Fax: (416) 490-5283 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Loc: BK02/Con/245/TOR -- Forwarded by Rick Kylie/Toronto/IBM on 10/30/2000 02:44 PM --- Susie Lau 10/30/2000 10:46 AM To: Rick Kylie/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA cc: From: Susie Lau/Toronto/IBM@ibmca Subject: ADSM messages Rick: the NT application log is dtill flooding with the following messages Event ID :3002 Source ADSM Client Description: Create failed for the ADSM client performance counter thread list mutex. The mutex name is in the attached data Event ID : 1008 Source: Perflib Description: The Open Procedure for service "ADSM Client Performance" in DLL "dsmcperf.dll" failed. Performance data for this serice will not be available.Status returned is DWORD 0. Please investigate Susie Lau Tel: (416) 490-2125 Fax: (416) 490-2335 [EMAIL PROTECTED] BK03/NJ2/251/TOR _ IBM Global Services
Re: Schedule definition for SAP online and offline backups.
What software are you using as software for the online backup? We are using SQL Backtrack and TDP for SAP. With SQL Backtrack we use a cron job to run the backups and that is maintained by the DBA's. With TDP we use the SAP scheduler to do the backup and that is maintained by the Basis team. According to one of our Basis guys you would have to set up 7 different jobs unless you do something with profiles. That is what we do... Hope it helps. -Original Message- From: Talafous, John G. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 1:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Schedule definition for SAP online and offline backups. Anyone experienced at this? I have this scenario. SAP team wants an online backup each night at midnight. This will happen Sunday through Friday. SAP team wants an offline backup on Saturday at midnight. O.K., not too bad. So, I read the manual(s) on defining schedules and am puzzling over the best way to do the Sunday through Friday backup. Is there a better way than defining six (6) backup schedules for these days? TIA John G. Talafous IS Technical Principal The Timken Company Global Software Support P.O. Box 6927 Data Management 1835 Dueber Ave. S.W. Phone: (330)-471-3390 Canton, Ohio USA 44706-0927 Fax : (330)-471-4034 [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.timken.com/
Re: Schedule definition for SAP online and offline backups.
John, Use the DAYofweek=WEEKDay for the Monday - Friday backups, and the DAYofweek=WEEKEnd for Saturday, with a separate sched with same parameter for Sunday. Three's better than six. Glen -Original Message- From: Talafous, John G. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 2:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Schedule definition for SAP online and offline backups. Anyone experienced at this? I have this scenario. SAP team wants an online backup each night at midnight. This will happen Sunday through Friday. SAP team wants an offline backup on Saturday at midnight. O.K., not too bad. So, I read the manual(s) on defining schedules and am puzzling over the best way to do the Sunday through Friday backup. Is there a better way than defining six (6) backup schedules for these days? TIA John G. Talafous IS Technical Principal The Timken Company Global Software Support P.O. Box 6927 Data Management 1835 Dueber Ave. S.W. Phone: (330)-471-3390 Canton, Ohio USA 44706-0927 Fax : (330)-471-4034 [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.timken.com/
Schedule definition for SAP online and offline backups.
Anyone experienced at this? I have this scenario. SAP team wants an online backup each night at midnight. This will happen Sunday through Friday. SAP team wants an offline backup on Saturday at midnight. O.K., not too bad. So, I read the manual(s) on defining schedules and am puzzling over the best way to do the Sunday through Friday backup. Is there a better way than defining six (6) backup schedules for these days? TIA John G. Talafous IS Technical Principal The Timken Company Global Software Support P.O. Box 6927 Data Management 1835 Dueber Ave. S.W. Phone: (330)-471-3390 Canton, Ohio USA 44706-0927 Fax : (330)-471-4034 [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.timken.com/
Re: Collocation
Hi: Colocation of storage pool: fast restores and easy recover of a lost volume by backing up a single client. I would if sufficient resources are available. >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/30/00 01:37PM >>> Can anyone tell me the pros and cons of doing collocation. Will collocation work for and offsite storage pool? Thomas R. Berning 8485 Broadwell Road Cincinnati, OH. 45244 Phone: 513-388-2857 Pager:513-343-2085 Cell: 513-218-3946 Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ATTN ALL TSM USERS: Windows NT/2000 Daylight Savings Time Problem
At 04:44 PM 10/27/2000 -0700, you wrote: >IMPORTANT - PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING: > >A problem with the switch between Daylight Savings Time (DST) and Standard >Time (STD) has just been discovered for the Windows TSM clients. Andy, thank you for the detailed note on Friday afternoon. An open note to TSM product managers: A problem very similar to this one got into the ADSM Windows client a few years ago, and caused significant grief to ADSM sites. I find it distressing to see a similar problem show up again. Sure, it is probably a different bug, but what it indicates is that insufficient quality control was added following the last occurrence of this bug. If a test for this had been added to the quality control process, this bug would have been detected before the code had been distributed. This does make me wonder what, if any, testing is done before the code is made available for distribution. If you cannot learn from the past, you (and all of us) will be forever condemned to repeat the same experiences again and again.
Re: Daylight time change
Issue 'accept date' -- Joshua S. Bassi IBM Certified - AIX Support, HACMP, Enterprise Disk(Shark)& Tape Solutions Tivoli Certified Consultant - ADSM/TSM [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Selva, Perpetua Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 8:37 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Daylight time change Importance: High Hi Our servers' time does not reflect DST.. So i changed it on R/S600 aix box change date/time parameter. However it displays this " show time Current Date and Time on the Server 10/30/00 11:29:46 UTC (GMT) Date/Time is: 10/30/00 16:29:46 Last Noted Date/Time is: 10/30/00 10:33:02 - can someone pls let me know what else i should take it into consideration.. Thanks--
ARchivals
Can we set up archivals offsite and 'restoring procedures'? What's involved?
Collocation
Can anyone tell me the pros and cons of doing collocation. Will collocation work for and offsite storage pool? Thomas R. Berning 8485 Broadwell Road Cincinnati, OH. 45244 Phone: 513-388-2857 Pager:513-343-2085 Cell: 513-218-3946 Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Daylight time change
Hi Our servers' time does not reflect DST.. So i changed it on R/S600 aix box change date/time parameter. However it displays this " show time Current Date and Time on the Server 10/30/00 11:29:46 UTC (GMT) Date/Time is: 10/30/00 16:29:46 Last Noted Date/Time is: 10/30/00 10:33:02 - can someone pls let me know what else i should take it into consideration.. Thanks--
Re: ANR4706W
>ANR4706W Unable to open file CommandLineBeanInfo.class Geoff - See APAR IX86373, which regards this as a browser problem, and says that the message can be ignored. Richard Sims, BU
Re: ANR4706W
Seen similar issue due to a problem (I think it is still there, even at V4.1) with respect to M$ Internet Exploder (doesnt happen in Netscape Navigator/Communicator). We can reproduce it by pressing ENTER from a WWW session, versus clicking on the SUBMIT/OK button. Another thought would be, have you upgraded/applied maintenance to the server and not done the IDL update ? "Gill, Geoffrey L." To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ANR4706W Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] T.EDU> 10/30/00 12:23 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" I was wondering if anyone has seen this before. The operators were receiving the following message when trying to query the server for completed schedules for their report. 10/27/00 17:48:14 ANR4706W Unable to open file CommandLineBeanInfo.class to satisfy web session 20622. Here is the info for the message: ANR4706W Unable to open file Filename to satisfy web session Session ID. Explanation: A web browser requested a file and the server could not find the file on the local file system. Special note, some files requested from the server are not vaild and are caused by a browser error. For example, a request for CommandLineBeanInfo.class is not a valid file request. However, a request of a GIF image or HTML page should not produce this error. System Action: None. User Response: Verify that permission for the file are set correctly and file exists. I used the command line to get the info but in the case of the operators it's easier if they just use the web interface. I resolved the issue by halting adsm and restarting it but don't know why that would have cleared it up after reading the explanation above. Can anyone explain this to me? Is there an easier fix for this without taking the server down? ADSM 3.1.2.55 AIX 4.3.3 Geoff Gill NT Systems Support Engineer SAIC Computer Systems Group E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (858) 826-4062 Pager: (888) 997-9614
Re: Joke
On Sun, 29 Oct 2000 22:55:58 -0500, you wrote: >Please beware that the message attachment contains a variant of the >Love_Letter VB Script worm/virus. Just delete the mail. > >Ramesh >-Original Message- >From: Ron James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2000 7:28 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: fwd: Joke Glad i'm not using outlook :-)
Element number for STK L180
I have a problem in configure a StorageTek L180 tapelibrary on AIX. I can "see" the drive like rmtX, and I have configured the library as lb0. In TSM 3.7 I have configured libr with no problem, but when I will configure the to drives (DLT7000) I get an error. My command is this: def drive device=/dev/rmtX element=500 Respons is illigal element number :-(, but at http://www.tivoli.com/support/storage_mgr/devices_latest/atab94.htm is shows element numbers from 500 - 509. What do I do wrong ?? Have also tryed with numbers = 0500, 509 with same result Best regards and I hope some one cane help me. Bent Lerager
ANR4706W
I was wondering if anyone has seen this before. The operators were receiving the following message when trying to query the server for completed schedules for their report. 10/27/00 17:48:14 ANR4706W Unable to open file CommandLineBeanInfo.class to satisfy web session 20622. Here is the info for the message: ANR4706W Unable to open file Filename to satisfy web session Session ID. Explanation: A web browser requested a file and the server could not find the file on the local file system. Special note, some files requested from the server are not vaild and are caused by a browser error. For example, a request for CommandLineBeanInfo.class is not a valid file request. However, a request of a GIF image or HTML page should not produce this error. System Action: None. User Response: Verify that permission for the file are set correctly and file exists. I used the command line to get the info but in the case of the operators it's easier if they just use the web interface. I resolved the issue by halting adsm and restarting it but don't know why that would have cleared it up after reading the explanation above. Can anyone explain this to me? Is there an easier fix for this without taking the server down? ADSM 3.1.2.55 AIX 4.3.3 Geoff Gill NT Systems Support Engineer SAIC Computer Systems Group E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (858) 826-4062 Pager: (888) 997-9614
HSM for Windows NT
We are considering implementing a HSM solution to clean up disk space across approx 850 NT servers. I am looking for information about the various available software packages. I know there are several alternatives on the market. Has anyone implemented a HSM solution? If so, what program did you use/try out and what are your results. satisfied ? what kind of disk reclamation did you see after implementation. TIA T Tony Garrison MCSE, MCP+I, A+ I/T Systems Programmer USAA 210-913-9836 PROFESSIONALISM RESULTING IN DEDICATION to EXCELLENCE October 2000 - PRIDE PRINCIPLE of the month # 8 - Keep it simple - make it easy for our customers to do business with us and for us to work together
AIT Tape technology
Hi, everyone... The management here is considering ditching our 3494 w/ 2x 3590-B1A's for a Qualstar AIT tape solution in order to save money. I have concerns that this could potentially reduce efficiency, availability, and reliability. Could anyone offer any comments on why this would be a good/bad idea? I've got two years under my belt with the IBM gear, but am having trouble finding much real-world info on the AIT technology. Would this be a major step backwards for us? Thanks in advance for any comments. Regards, Brian +---+ | Brian T. Huntley Systems and Network Engineer | | Campus Information Services, Clarkson University | | Ph/FAX: 315.268-6723/6570 | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.clarkson.edu/cis | +---+ UNIX *is* user friendly. It's just selective about who its friends are. PGP Public Key available. finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCW / WORM Media
Hi all, Can anybody explain the difference of CCW and WORM Medias to me? Do I handle CCWs the same way as Worms under TSM ?? Thanks in advance Andy -- Andreas Pamminger ILS Consult [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---
Re: TDP Domino / Solaris 8
Dave, No. TDP for Lotus Domino is not supported on Solaris 8. We know that it is needed and we have it in the works. Thanks, Del Del Hoobler IBM Corporation [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dave Benny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 10/30/2000 09:45:09 AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: TDP Domino / Solaris 8 Does anybody knows if the TDP for Lotus Domino works with Solaris 8? In all documentation the highest Solaris level is 7. Thanks. Dave
Re: TSM 4.1 AIX and Emulex
Michael, the LP7000 has no device driver for any RS6000 system. Only the LP8000 will be supported and is running in this OS system with emulation. with best regards /Mit freundlichen Gr|ssen Norbert Klaus Martin Leiter technical Support Phone: +49-6103-20558-18 Fax:+49-6103-20558-10 Mobile +49-170-2234111 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -Original Message- > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Klatt, Michael > Sent: Montag, 30. Oktober 2000 15:37 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: TSM 4.1 AIX and Emulex > > > Hi all, > > if I follow Tivolis SAN Interoperability Side, than it's not > validated that > TSM 4.1 for AIX 4.3.3 using HBA from Emulex (LP7000) can be connected to > any kind of switch device. > > Does any one has experience in this configuration? > > Thanks in advance for your help > > Mit freundlichem Gru_ / kind regards > > Michael Klatt > Storage Consultant SAN-Solutions-Team > +49.40.27 84 75 40 phone > +49.40.27 24 65 fax > +49.172.432 24 63 mobile > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > StorageTek > INFORMATION made POWERFUL >
TSM 4.1 AIX and Emulex
Hi all, if I follow Tivolis SAN Interoperability Side, than it's not validated that TSM 4.1 for AIX 4.3.3 using HBA from Emulex (LP7000) can be connected to any kind of switch device. Does any one has experience in this configuration? Thanks in advance for your help Mit freundlichem Gruß / kind regards Michael Klatt Storage Consultant SAN-Solutions-Team +49.40.27 84 75 40 phone +49.40.27 24 65 fax +49.172.432 24 63 mobile Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] StorageTek INFORMATION made POWERFUL
Library question
Is it possible to massage two kinds of tape drives in one library? Need I a additional software for it? Thanks. Dave - Get personalized e-mail and a web address or your own free e-mail at http://www.networksolutions.com.
TDP Domino / Solaris 8
Does anybody knows if the TDP for Lotus Domino works with Solaris 8? In all documentation the highest Solaris level is 7. Thanks. Dave - Get personalized e-mail and a web address or your own free e-mail at http://www.networksolutions.com.
Re: Excluding files from archive
Hi Stephanie, I think you are very lucky, we are waiting for this option since year and If I am not wrong, the "exclude.archive" statement exists since version 3.7.2 or later Readme of 4.1.1 client: - 3. Late-Breaking News - What's New -- - Files may now be excluded from archive via the EXCLUDE.ARCHIVE option. Please refer to the "Installing the Clients" or "Using the Backup-Archive Client" manual for further information on using this option. (Note: this option was introduced with the version 3.7.2 client.) Frederic Medico SP2 System Engineer Kraft Foods European Service Center Boulevard Internationale 55 B-1070 Brussels - Bruxelles [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Stephanie canon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 2:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Excluding files from archive Hi, I would like to archive a server, and excluding files. How can I do this? The include-exclude file doesn't seem to be used during the archive process, and I can not used any option to exclude specified files? Did I miss something? Is there anyway to exclude files from archive process? Thanks for your help. --- Stéphanie Canon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel : 02 38 74 59 41
Re: no more reclamation
Do you have a specific time when your expire inventory is run? What's your ExpInterval set to. If 0, expiration will only occur you run an expire inventory. >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/27/00 05:30PM >>> Why has all of a sudden, the reclamation stopped running? It's set at 50. All vols access are read/write. -Long _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com.
Excluding files from archive
Hi, I would like to archive a server, and excluding files. How can I do this? The include-exclude file doesn't seem to be used during the archive process, and I can not used any option to exclude specified files? Did I miss something? Is there anyway to exclude files from archive process? Thanks for your help. --- Stéphanie Canon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel : 02 38 74 59 41
Re: can't label tapes, ADSM 3.1 and ACSL 5.2 and STK 9710 wi
I am also using same library stk9710 . try following and you wil be compfortable. The syntax of the label libvol command is wrong. It should be: label libvol libname search=yes volrange=1stvol,lastvol checkin=scratch You can't use the labelsource parameter. You can also label a single volume: label libvol libname volname checkin=scratch. Shekhar [EMAIL PROTECTED] "[EMAIL PROTECTED]/P=Internet/A= /C=us" on 10/28/2000 09:01:37 PM Please respond to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]/P=Internet/A= /C=us" @ X400 To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]/P=Internet/A= /C=us"@X400 cc: Subject: can't label tapes, ADSM 3.1 and ACSL 5.2 and STK 9710 with S Hello ADSM administrators, I'm trying to label brand new DLT tapes to create ADSM scratch volumes using various variants of the "label" and "checkin" commands e.g. label libv tapelib B00880 label libv tapelib B00880 overwrite=yes checkin libv tapelib B00880 stat=scratch Nothing seems to work. The activity log has: ANR8802E LABEL LIBVOLUME process 351 for library B00880 failed. ANR0985I Process 351 for LABEL LIBVOLUME running in the BACKGROUND completed with completion state FAILURE. ANR8426E CHECKIN LIBVOLUME for volume B00880 in library TAPELIB failed In the past I have been able to get the need for scratch tapes covered through reclamation and offsite recalls, so this is a first to me. Do I need to label new tapes with a utility or? The OS is AIX 4.2.1 but it would not seem to have any bearing. Any help would be appreciated. -- regards, Peter Koblauch, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chaning Layout from one to two Tape Librarys
We are currently using *SM with one IBM 3575-L32 Tape Library. In these library are the stgpools volumes and the copypool volumes located. Because we need more capacity we are installing a second 3575-L32 Tape Library. My idea is to have the copypool volumes located in the new library. How should we accomplish this: 1. by moving tapes by hand physically from old to new library and changing "some" definitions in TSM/DB? 2. by defining a new copypool and migration to this copypool? For case no. 2 we are not happy with the thought of migrating data from tapevolume ==> drive ==> *SM-Server ==> drive ==> tapevolume because this will take a lot of time! In case no. 1 would we have to mess around with the *SM DB? Any thoughts about this are very much appreciated! Eurodis Schweiz AG Data Division Timo Kilchenmann Systems Engineer --- Timo Kilchenmann E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] Eurodis Schweiz AG Phone +41 1 843 34 91 (direct) Bahnstrasse 58/60or +41 1 843 32 32 CH-8105 Regensdorf Telefax +41 1 843 34 24 Switzerland Mobile +41 79 417 43 55 http://www.eurodis.ch ---
StorageTek 9500 Shared Virtual Array......
Hi *SM's we have a NT 4.0 SP6 box connected to a StorageTek 9500 Shared Virtual Array via SCSI. The SVA Disk array is connected to a OS/390 via a Escon channel, and the sva disk array have Snapshot function. The ADSM vers. 3.1.2.50 server is OS/390. Now me question is: Is it possible to made a file backup of the snapshot or can I made the backup throug the Escon to the ADSM server ??? or is it over the LAN ?? * Sincerely, Bo Nielsen FDB dataPhone: +45 4386 4671 Roskildevej 65 Fax: +45 4386 4990 DK-2620 AlbertslundE-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Denmark
Re: Joke
Please beware that the message attachment contains a variant of the Love_Letter VB Script worm/virus. Just delete the mail. Ramesh -Original Message- From: Ron James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2000 7:28 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fwd: Joke
PB with NOTES with quotas when restoring
Hi all, My pb concerns restoring Notes mailboxes where quotas are implemented and the restore is over quotas. Notes 4.6 ADSM 3.1 Are some of you having the same pb? How have you solved it? Thanks for your help. Christine KRAJEWSKI
AW: ATTN ALL TSM USERS: Windows NT/2000 Daylight Savings Time Pro blem - Solved
I have only one large NT server (200GB over Tokenring) using 3.7.2.01, the other clients with 3.7.2.01 are small or have a 3.1 version. What happens if you install the fixtest v3.7.2.17 after canceling a nearly 30 % done backup with a 3.7.2.01 client. Are these 30 % backuped agaiin due to their incorrect date? If i do nothing and let the "full" backup complete and install next month the fixed clientversion do i run into a full backup again? With regards Stefan Holzwarth > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Neil Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Gesendet am: Sonntag, 29. Oktober 2000 21:07 > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Betreff: Re: ATTN ALL TSM USERS: Windows NT/2000 Daylight Savings Time > Problem - Solved > > Contrary to to my last e-mail, v3.7.2.17 appears to have > fixed my problem. > > The first time I installed it, I forgot to stop the Scheduler > and Client > Acceptor services first. Even though I rebooted the client, > some of the EXEs and > DLLs in the BAClient directory weren't replaced. The result > was a hybrid of the > two versions. Re-installing with no TSM processes running > sorted this out. > > I have since started an incremental backup which is currently running. > Everything appears to be fine, with only modified files being > backed up. > > Thanks very much to everybody concerned for helping me sort this out. > > Neil > > > > > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may also be legally > privileged. The contents are intended for recipient only and > are subject > to the legal notice available at http://www.keldagroup.com/email.htm > Yorkshire Water Services Limited > Registered Office 2 The Embankment Sovereign Street Leeds LS1 4BG > Registered in England and Wales No 2366682 >
Re: TDP for Lotus Domino on Solaris - please urgent
Thank you Del , I add symbolic link for libnotes.so and everythink is OK. Regards Petr - Původní zpráva - Od: Del Hoobler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Komu: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Odesláno: 26. října 2000 22:47 Předmět: Re: TDP for Lotus Domino on Solaris - please urgent Petr, I suggest taking a look on pages 14, 15, and 16 of TDP for Lotus Domino for Unix (Installation and User's Guide), in the section "Setting Environment Variables", to setup the environment variables to point to the Domino and TSM libraries. And one more point, under /usr/lib, there should be a symbolic link libnotes.so point to the actual library in the path where Domino is installed. For example: cd /usr/lib ls -l libnotes.so libnotes.so -> /lotus/notes/5041/sunspa/libnotes.so Note: without this symbolic link, the Agent would not know how to find libnotes.so. Thanks, Del Del Hoobler IBM Corporation [EMAIL PROTECTED] Petr Přerost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 10/26/2000 01:46:37 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: TDP for Lotus Domino on Solaris - please urgent Hello , first of all my knowledge of Solaris is very very basic - I am installing TDP for Lotus Domino 1.1.1 on Solaris 2.7 , backup client installs and runs successfully so I continue with TDP - after installation ( succesfull according to result of install process and domsetup script ) I enter domdsmc command : /opt/lotus/notes/latest/sunspa/domdsmc query adsm - adsmpwd=xxx ld.so.1 : /opt/lotus/notes/latest/sunspa/domdsmc : fatal : libnotes.so open failed : No such file or directory So I checked system for libnotes.so - it is in Domino directory and this is in PATH , i found 3 ld.so.1 ( /etc/lib , /usr/lib , /usr/lib/sparcv9 ) - every one is different . I upgraded Domino form 5.0.2c to 5.0.3 and to 5.0.4 - no luck , so I tried command from Domino console > lo domdsmc and it runs OK ! ? I used root user ( and Domito runs under root during tests ) . Any help will be highly appreciated. Petr Prerost e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] =
3995 Installation
Hi all, I have to configure a 3995 - C68 Library to my TSM 3.7.3 Server on AIX 4.3.3. Does anybody have such a configuration, or know how to configure it? I tried to to configure it like this: Library: lb0 Drives : rop0 ... rop3 devclass :WORM ( I am using CCW Medias) I can label Medias without problems in TSM, BUT I get errpt entries on AIX. If I trie to migrate or store data on the Worms, TSM says that "there are no mount points" available. Thanks in advance. Andy PS: Where can I get more Information about using/handling optical medias with TSM?? -- Andreas Pamminger ILS Consult [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---
