Re: Install problem with a 3502-108 DLT changer
James, I tried to use the LBTEST.EXE but this errors on every command which made me very suspicious that I have not configured the drive/autochanger correctly this is why I posed this message and wondered if any one else is using one of these drives and what the setting are? I will post tomorrow the "ADSMDLIST.EXE FILENAME ." as you suggested perhaps there is some clue there Regards, Geoff Pusey Tivoli Advisory Consultant Tivoli Systems. Office : +44 (0)1753 896896 Mobile : +44 (0) 780 8203704 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] James Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 12/01/2000 04:31:34 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: Install problem with a 3502-108 DLT changer First off you should upgrade from the 3.7.0.0 GA code. Secondly, to see if you have it set correctly, post the output of ADSMDLIST.EXE FILENAME . This executable is located in the UTILS directory where TSM is installed. You can also play around with LBTEST.EXE in the same directory. LBTEST.EXE allows you to move tapes around in the library. James Thompson >From: Geoff Pusey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Install problem with a 3502-108 DLT changer >Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2000 14:57:59 + > >Hi, > >I hope some one can verify if I have installed and configured this drive >correctly. > >I have a NT 4 with sp6 in a NT cluster environment. with "Storage >Management Server for Windows NT - Version 3, Release 7, Level 0.0" > >tsm: NMRIOESRV01>q drive > >Library Name Drive NameDevice Type DeviceON LINE > --- >--- >LB0.0.0.3 MT1.0.0.3 DLT MT1.0.0.3 Yes > > > > >** >*** ---> Q VOLUME >** > > >Volume Name Storage >Device Estimated Pct Volume >Pool >Name Class Name Capacity Util Status > (MB) > --- -- - >- >D:\ADSMDATA\DISK1.DSMBACKUPPOOL DISK25.0 > 98.4 On-Line >IOE1 DLTPOOL1 >DLTCLASS1 35,840.00.0 Filling > > >The Library was set up as element = 16 >As all the 3502 drives linked me to this web site and as I only have one >drive I thought it must be element 16. Is this right? > > > > IBM 3502-314 > >Device > SCSI ID > > Device Name >Tape drive 1 (element 16) > >__ > >__ >Tape drive 2 (element 17) > >__ > >__ >Tape drive 3 (element 18) > >__ > >__ >Robot > >__ > >__ > > > >Notes: >1.The following options should be >set during configuration: >Enable barcode >Autoload cartridge - NO >Auto Cleaning - NO (The >cleaning cartridge must be in the last slot) >Ramdom mode > > > >My problem is that when I do a backup and it migrates to the library I get >the error no space left in volume? Is this a problem with the library or my > config? > >I can read in new tapes and label them, but I am unable to copy any data to >them. > >Any suggestions would be most appreciated > >Regards, > >Geoff Pusey >Tivoli Advisory Consultant >Tivoli Systems. >Office : +44 (0)1753 896896 >Mobile : +44 (0) 780 8203704 >Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com
Re: TSM for file transfer?
>I'm looking for a way to pull logs from remote TSM clients and servers to a >central machine, as part of a "single point of control" effort. I'd like to >bring the schedule.log files from clients, and also things like the >dsmaccnt.log from a remote server in to my management server for analysis. > >"Normal" options such as ftp, nfs mounts, rcp, etc. are not available to me, as >we have a quite restricted environment. John - Given the intent of a restricted environment, I think the best approach would be "push" rather than "pull". That is, systems wanting you to see their data should provide it to you. Having them send it to your system via email is the simplest method, but clunky and dicey for large files. The optimum method would be for them to copy the files to an AFS or NFS file system that is served to them either by your server, or some neutral file server, from which you can pick them up for processing according to identifiable directory and file names. This sounds like the kind of Enterprise Management issue for which Tivoli as a company may have an answer in one of their products. Richard Sims, BU
