Tab Trepagnier/Corporation/Laitram/US is out of the office.
I will be out of the office from 05/20/2001 until 05/29/2001. If this is an emergency, please contact Mark Duck at ext. 1623; or call the ITS Support Center at ext. 1284. I will have limited access to email and voicemail during the period.
Re: Global Exclude
Fred, CLOPTSETs are SERVER SIDE filters. The guys who install TSM client on desktop do not need to know if you have filters or not. I don't understand your pb. I see two solutions 1) you define a huge CLOPTSET for all your platforms (NT,UNIXes, Mac) and all your nodes are attached to this cloptset. Only mathing rules for the concerned platform will be applied, but processing time will be longer... 2) you define a CLOPTSET for each platform (like me). Processing time will be short. Moreover if you user the flag FORCE=YES, your server rules will override those potentially defined by your install-guys / users. Sen me offline of this list, your INCLEXCL lists ... rv -Message d'origine- De : Fred Johanson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Envoyé : vendredi 18 mai 2001 22:53 À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : Re: Global Exclude Herve, Your list is similar to the one I distribute. The problem is that the people who install the clients ignore it, even when it's in the same folder as the client code on our distribution machine. Over a thousand of my 1500+ clients are Windows or Mac desktops, and half or more have incomplete inclexcl lists. I can have someone write some code that will build a CLOPTSET that contains my minimum list and attaches it to all appropriate clients as well as updating all existing CLOPTSETs to include my list. But if there is another way to do it, a central list that defaults for the entire system, I'd rather go with that. At 09:49 AM 5/18/2001 +0200, you wrote: Hi Fred, here is my CLOPTSET for all these annoying stuff ... rv -Message d'origine- De : Fred Johanson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Envoyé : jeudi 17 mai 2001 19:41 À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : Global Exclude I find an awful amount of storage is filled with Internet Cache and Temp files. I frequently post to my users what the minimum include-exclude list should be, but it is usually ignored. Short of creating an optionset with the proper exclude statements and editing all the existing ones, there are more than 1500 clients out there, is there any way to keep this stuff out of backups?
TSM SNMP Management
Dear all, to be able to monitor the TSM and our 3494-Library with Netview (SNMP-based) I'm looking for MIB's of these components. We have already implemented the adsmserv.mib but in addition to this we need a MIB called ibm2100.mib and a MIB for the IBM 3494-Library. Do you have information on that? Regards Uwe Any e-mail message from the European Central Bank (ECB) is sent in good faith but shall neither be binding nor construed as constituting a commitment by the ECB except where provided for in a written agreement. This e-mail is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. Any unauthorised disclosure, use or dissemination, either in whole or in part, is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately via e-mail and delete this e-mail from your system.
AW: Storage Pools
Hi Tom, you leave us in darkness what your offsite pool exactly is. If it is a backup storage pool of your onsite pool, then yes, deleting onsite files will delete offsite files as well. Seems like what you want to accomplish is simply effectively turn co-location on, for new and for existing data. There are simple ways to achieve this, like following: - update the storage pool concerned to be co-located - be sure you have reasonably much free tape volumes in it - tape by tape, move data from existing volumes back either into same storage pool, or in the originating primary disk storage pool. You will not loose a single file and you will end with collocated tapes. regards Juraj Salak -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Berning, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet am: Freitag, 18. Mai 2001 20:41 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Storage Pools I am currently running ADSM 3.1.2.50 and will be converting to TSM 4.1. The question I have is my boss would like to keep all of the data that is currently on our offsite copy pool and on our onsite archive pool. What he want is to destroy the onsite migration pool, then start new backups of all of the systems and migrate them to the onsite migration pool using co-location. My question is if we delete all of the migration pool tapes and discard the data will it also remove the data from the offsite copy pool tapes or will they remain in tact in case something needs to be restored from that pool? We want to do this right after we convert from ADSM to TSM. Thanks in advance for any responses. Thomas R. Berning UNIX Systems Administrator 8485 Broadwell Road Cincinnati, OH 45244 Phone: 513-388-2857 Fax: 513-388- Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lotus Approach ODBC Information
Where can we get more information with regards to the above-mentioned (setup info). We are experiencing problems when logging into TSM - Lotus Approach hangs when supplying the TSM user name and password. Any reply will be greatly appreciated.
bare metal restore for NT...
I'm looking a tool or agent that i can use for complete disaster recovery for NT. I heard this tool, can you please provide me enough information. thanks a lot. Zosi Noriega ADNOC P.O. Box 898 AUH - AUE
RMAN instead of AIX Scripts ???.
Hi Chaps, We will soon be moving away from using AIX scripts to backup Oracle databases, and will be using RMAN. Could anyone point me in the right direction as to where I can find out more about how RMAN interacts with TSM, what is needed, etc and how it works?. Kind Regards, Roy Lake RS/6000, SP Tivoli Storage Manager Administrator Axial (UK) Ltd Tel: 0208 526 8883 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** IMPORTANT INFORMATION ** This message is intended only for the use of the person(s) (the Intended Recipient) to whom it is addressed. It may contain information which is privileged and confidential within the meaning of applicable law. Accordingly any dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of this message or any of its content by any person other than the Intended Recipient may constitute a breach of civil or criminal law and is strictly prohibited. The views in this message or it's attachments are that of the sender. If you are not the Intended Recipient please contact the sender and dispose of this email as soon as possible. If in doubt contact the Tibbett Britten European IT Helpdesk on 0870 607 6777 (UK) or +0044 870 607 6777 (Non UK).
Re: bare metal restore for NT...
You may want to look at the Kernel Groups Bare Metal Recovery tool. We are planning on bringing them in here. Supposedly its a one button recovery that interacts with TSM. By the way the Kernel Group is part of IBM. Jack -Original Message- From: Zosimo Noriega (ADNOC IST) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 6:08 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: bare metal restore for NT... I'm looking a tool or agent that i can use for complete disaster recovery for NT. I heard this tool, can you please provide me enough information. thanks a lot. Zosi Noriega ADNOC P.O. Box 898 AUH - AUE
dsmc incremental terminated with error on AIX
Hello! I get the follwing output when I start an incremental Backup session on the machine. The actlog on the server only reports entries for terminated sessions. Thats's true. After the error the dsmc cut off and create a core. ---snip # dsmc Tivoli Storage Manager Command Line Backup Client Interface - Version 4, Release 1, Level 2.0 (C) Copyright IBM Corporation, 1990, 2000, All Rights Reserved. tsm incremental Node Name: HELENE Session established with server DUESENTRIEB: AIX-RS/6000 Server Version 3, Release 1, Level 2.16 Server date/time: 21.05.2001 11:35:42 Last access: 21.05.2001 11:25:11 The assert subroutine failed: poolP-incSize 0, file mempool.cpp, line 719 IOT/Abort trap ---snip Any Idea what is wrong with the System. Thanks in advance for any responses Some more Informations for you: Last week we installed a second oracle 8.1.7 db on the machine (which use raw devices) and made a databse migration from the running oracle 7.3.4 stanby databse to the new 8.1.7. To enable AIO it was necessary to install the ML 8 patches on the existing AIX 4.3.3 ML 6. Backups using the api with oracle RMAN are working well at the moment. Before the last week changes we made backups without any problem. At this time the standby 7.3.4 db and the prior installed 8.1.7 db were already running. To prevent comments in conjunction with the Client/Server Versions: * Yes I know Server Release 3.1.16 is out of service. * Yes I know Client Version 4.1.2 is unsupported with server version 3.1.xxx * There is no way at the moment tu update the server. * We need the new Client Version, because we need a stable RMAN backup * The combination 4.1.2 Client with 3.1.16 Server is working well on other Systems I'm really looking forward to your hints Regards Clemens Sorry, one more question. Can anybody tell me where to find patch releases for the 3.1 Server version? They are no more present on the IBM. servers
Re: dsmc incremental terminated with error on AIX
Hi Clemens, upgrade your server first to 3.1.2.90 before posting this. I'm afraid people won't spend much time to help an these prehistoric version. Good luck rv -Message d'origine- De : Block, Clemens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Envoyé : lundi 21 mai 2001 14:07 À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : dsmc incremental terminated with error on AIX Hello! I get the follwing output when I start an incremental Backup session on the machine. The actlog on the server only reports entries for terminated sessions. Thats's true. After the error the dsmc cut off and create a core. ---snip # dsmc Tivoli Storage Manager Command Line Backup Client Interface - Version 4, Release 1, Level 2.0 (C) Copyright IBM Corporation, 1990, 2000, All Rights Reserved. tsm incremental Node Name: HELENE Session established with server DUESENTRIEB: AIX-RS/6000 Server Version 3, Release 1, Level 2.16 Server date/time: 21.05.2001 11:35:42 Last access: 21.05.2001 11:25:11 The assert subroutine failed: poolP-incSize 0, file mempool.cpp, line 719 IOT/Abort trap ---snip Any Idea what is wrong with the System. Thanks in advance for any responses Some more Informations for you: Last week we installed a second oracle 8.1.7 db on the machine (which use raw devices) and made a databse migration from the running oracle 7.3.4 stanby databse to the new 8.1.7. To enable AIO it was necessary to install the ML 8 patches on the existing AIX 4.3.3 ML 6. Backups using the api with oracle RMAN are working well at the moment. Before the last week changes we made backups without any problem. At this time the standby 7.3.4 db and the prior installed 8.1.7 db were already running. To prevent comments in conjunction with the Client/Server Versions: * Yes I know Server Release 3.1.16 is out of service. * Yes I know Client Version 4.1.2 is unsupported with server version 3.1.xxx * There is no way at the moment tu update the server. * We need the new Client Version, because we need a stable RMAN backup * The combination 4.1.2 Client with 3.1.16 Server is working well on other Systems I'm really looking forward to your hints Regards Clemens Sorry, one more question. Can anybody tell me where to find patch releases for the 3.1 Server version? They are no more present on the IBM. servers
Re: NT schedule is pending
This what I'm getting in dsmsched.log. Note the NT is on the network and client package is installed on the same PC. both of the services are running... 05/21/2001 13:16:07 sessOpen: Failure in communications open call. rc: -50 05/21/2001 16:46:03 TransWin32RC(): Win32 RC 32 from NtSecurityRead(): getSecurityDescriptor() for Owner SID SD 05/21/2001 16:46:03 ANS1228E Sending of object '\\w01520\d$\pagefile.sys' failed 05/21/2001 16:46:03 ANS4007E Error processing '\\w01520\d$\pagefile.sys': access to the object is denied 05/21/2001 16:48:06 ntConsoleEventHandler(): Caught Close console event . 05/21/2001 16:48:06 ntConsoleEventHandler(): Cleaning up and terminating Process ... following is the way the schedule is set Client schedules : SALAM_PC SALAM_PC Policy Domain Name SALAM_PC Schedule Name SALAM_PC Description Salam PC - Sample of NT Backup/Archive Action INCREMENTAL Options -SUB=no Objects c:\0csalam\salam\*.doc Priority1 Start date 2000-01-03 Start time 14:20:00 thanks, Salam -Original Message- From: ABDULSALAM ABDULLA Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2001 4:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: NT schedule is pending I'm trying to add an NT client for the first time. I have downloaded the client packages and installed the client, then changes the dsm.opt files and started the services on NT. The client is working file, which means if I go to client and start backup from GUI of from command line it's working OK. But the automatic schedule is not working, it means I have created policy and schedule and assign it to that client, the schedule stays in pending mode and it does not execute till it failes. I'm getting this error in dsmsched.log. this might not be related to this problem, but anyway.. 05/20/2001 14:36:11 ANS1818E Schedule function not allowed in loop mode. following is the assigned vale of dsm.opt commmethod tcpip tcpport 1500 TCPServeraddress 172.20.37.2 NodeName salam_pc passwordaccess generate SCHEDMODE PROMPTED schedlogname c:\progra~1\ibm\adsm\baclient\dsmsched.log errorlogname c:\progra~1\ibm\adsm\baclient\dsmsched.log ERRORLOGRETENTION 15 SCHEDLOGRETENTION 15 Thanks, Salam Salam R. Abdulla Project Leader Dubai Aluminum Company P. O. Box: 3627 Dubai, UAE
Re: dsmc incremental terminated with error on AIX
I get the follwing output when I start an incremental Backup session ... The assert subroutine failed: poolP-incSize 0, file mempool.cpp, line 719 Clemens - The client programmer wisely wrote the C software using the assert macro, to detect out-of-range array references and bad pointers. How to deal with it is the challenge. I'd first look to see if your client is memory-constrained, as being short on memory tends to cause many peculiar problems with software in general. Beyond that you could contact Tivili Support to see if this is a known problem with the TSM client. But you may be running into the 4.1-3.1 compatibility problems you fear. Sorry, one more question. Can anybody tell me where to find patch releases for the 3.1 Server version? They are no more present on the IBM. servers ftp://ftp.storsys.ibm.com/adsm/fixtest/v3r1/aixsrv/ has levels beyond what you are currently running. Richard Sims, BU
BRM Question
All, We just had a meeting with our support people for TSM, regarding finishing the project we have. To cut things short, one of the options we required was Bare Metal Restore of NT and Unix servers. Our TSM server sits on an NT server. We were just informed (and this is what I want to ask about) that the BRM server (TSM) module, does not operate if the TSM server is on an NT server. (As I understand from their explanation, there is the TSM server side module and the client module). So in effect, we cannot impliment BRM due to this factor. Does anyone know if this is true ? Mike Glassman System Security Admin Israeli Airports Authority Ben-Gurion Airport http://www.ben-gurion-airport.co.il Tel : 972-3-9710785 Fax : 972-3-9710939 Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usage of this email address or any email address at iaa.gov.il for the purpose of sales pitches, SPAM or any other such unwanted garbage, is illegal, and any person, whether corporate or alone doing so, will be prosecuted to the fullest possible extent.
Re: BRM Question
I thought he may be refering to the new and improved BMR from the Kernel Group. We are going to be looking at this shortly. The old BMR restore where you had to boot with an OS/2 diskette was not something we used. -Original Message- From: Serein, Gilbert Claudio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 9:54 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: BRM Question Hi Mike, my TSM server runs on NT and I've done BMR's to NT servers Without any problems. There are detail instructions how to accomplish a Successful BMR at http://www.coderelief.com http://www.coderelief.com . Regards Gilbert -Original Message- From: Mike Glassman - Admin [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 10:31 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:BRM Question All, We just had a meeting with our support people for TSM, regarding finishing the project we have. To cut things short, one of the options we required was Bare Metal Restore of NT and Unix servers. Our TSM server sits on an NT server. We were just informed (and this is what I want to ask about) that the BRM server (TSM) module, does not operate if the TSM server is on an NT server. (As I understand from their explanation, there is the TSM server side module and the client module). So in effect, we cannot impliment BRM due to this factor. Does anyone know if this is true ? Mike Glassman System Security Admin Israeli Airports Authority Ben-Gurion Airport http://www.ben-gurion-airport.co.il Tel : 972-3-9710785 Fax : 972-3-9710939 Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usage of this email address or any email address at iaa.gov.il for the purpose of sales pitches, SPAM or any other such unwanted garbage, is illegal, and any person, whether corporate or alone doing so, will be prosecuted to the fullest possible extent.
Re: Dr Watson while installing TSM on NT 4.0
Hi Kevin, Have you installed some stuff on your NT box before TSM ? Re-apply your latest SP and try again. rv -Message d'origine- De : Kevin M Wisneski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Envoyé : lundi 21 mai 2001 15:57 À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : Dr Watson while installing TSM on NT 4.0 I am installing TSM through the silent install on some NT 4.0 servers and I keep getting a DR. Watson on the msiexec.exefrom Microsoft. It doesn't seem to affect anything, if I hit OK on the alert, the install continues and there doesn't seem to be any ill effect. Has anyone else seen this problem??If so, what did you do to resolve it?? Thanks Kevin Wisneski Citigroup Hartford, CT 860-277-3157
Recovery Log
This morning I noticed my recovery log had risen to 83.2 at some point over the weekend. I'm already doing a full and one incremental backup of the log every day to keep it's size down. As you can see it's only 4GB and I still have room. The real question is, how and why did it get that high in the first place? The previous high had been 39.3%. Is there any way to find out what caused this or exactly when it happened? Thanks for the help Available Space (MB): 4,096 Assigned Capacity (MB): 4,096 Maximum Extension (MB): 0 Maximum Reduction (MB): 4,088 Page Size (bytes): 4,096 Total Usable Pages: 1,048,064 Used Pages: 465 Pct Util: 0.0 Max. Pct Util: 83.2 Physical Volumes: 2 Log Pool Pages: 2,048 Log Pool Pct. Util: 0.19 Log Pool Pct. Wait: 0.00 Cumulative Consumption (MB): 34,747.88 Consumption Reset Date/Time: 04/24/01 15:06:46 Geoff Gill TSM Administrator NT Systems Support Engineer SAIC E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (858) 826-4062 Pager: (888) 997-9614
Dr Watson while installing TSM on NT 4.0
I am installing TSM through the silent install on some NT 4.0 servers and I keep getting a DR. Watson on the msiexec.exefrom Microsoft. It doesn't seem to affect anything, if I hit OK on the alert, the install continues and there doesn't seem to be any ill effect. Has anyone else seen this problem??If so, what did you do to resolve it?? Thanks Kevin Wisneski Citigroup Hartford, CT 860-277-3157
Re: BRM Question
Hi Mike, my TSM server runs on NT and I've done BMR's to NT servers Without any problems. There are detail instructions how to accomplish a Successful BMR at http://www.coderelief.com http://www.coderelief.com . Regards Gilbert -Original Message- From: Mike Glassman - Admin [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 10:31 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:BRM Question All, We just had a meeting with our support people for TSM, regarding finishing the project we have. To cut things short, one of the options we required was Bare Metal Restore of NT and Unix servers. Our TSM server sits on an NT server. We were just informed (and this is what I want to ask about) that the BRM server (TSM) module, does not operate if the TSM server is on an NT server. (As I understand from their explanation, there is the TSM server side module and the client module). So in effect, we cannot impliment BRM due to this factor. Does anyone know if this is true ? Mike Glassman System Security Admin Israeli Airports Authority Ben-Gurion Airport http://www.ben-gurion-airport.co.il Tel : 972-3-9710785 Fax : 972-3-9710939 Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usage of this email address or any email address at iaa.gov.il for the purpose of sales pitches, SPAM or any other such unwanted garbage, is illegal, and any person, whether corporate or alone doing so, will be prosecuted to the fullest possible extent.
Windows 2000 with TSM 3.7 and ESP
I have recently installed the TSM client on a Win2000 server and am trying to run my backups via ESP. I am having ESP launch a basic Command file on my Win2000 server, which inturn starts my backup. However it seems to fail from ESP. If I run this command locally it works fine. Any Help with Win2000? Command file is very very basic. set evnrvar.txt c: cd\program files\tivoli\tsm\baclient dsmc incremental exit I am also not running the TSM scheduler service. I have to use ESP for all my scheduling. Thanks Tim
Re: Excessive Read Errors on LTO
unsubscribe -Original Message- From: Suad Musovich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 10:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Excessive Read Errors on LTO Be wary of upgrading the firmware on LTO drives. See the thread last week entitled Re: LTO restore performance - seek problem?, there are some major read performance problems in the last 3 releases of the LTO drive firmware. In the past two weeks i've gone from OBN1 to OCE1 to 12U7, and yesterday to 1550. And i'm still having problems. I'd really like to go back to OBN1 if i could find it... Seek problems are one thing, read/write/locate errors are another. Suad -- Volume Name: UA0038 Storage Pool Name: LTOPOOL Device Class Name: LTOCLASS Estimated Capacity (MB): 162,532.5 Pct Util: 27.9 Volume Status: Filling Access: Destroyed Pct. Reclaimable Space: 73.7 Scratch Volume?: Yes In Error State?: No Number of Writable Sides: 1 Number of Times Mounted: 147 Write Pass Number: 1 Approx. Date Last Written: 04/27/2001 03:31:47 Approx. Date Last Read: 05/16/2001 09:42:12 Date Became Pending: Number of Write Errors: 2 Number of Read Errors: 21 Volume Location: Last Update by (administrator): BACKUP Last Update Date/Time: 05/17/2001 11:45:53
Re: Dr Watson while installing TSM on NT 4.0
I've seen this problem before also. I believe the Windows Installer was really designed for 2000. I do not do silent installs because of this. We do it manually now but sometimes I see the same error even when we do it manually. It never seems to effect anything for me either. Just another day in the life of NT. -Original Message- From: Kevin M Wisneski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 9:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Dr Watson while installing TSM on NT 4.0 I am installing TSM through the silent install on some NT 4.0 servers and I keep getting a DR. Watson on the msiexec.exefrom Microsoft. It doesn't seem to affect anything, if I hit OK on the alert, the install continues and there doesn't seem to be any ill effect. Has anyone else seen this problem?? If so, what did you do to resolve it?? Thanks Kevin Wisneski Citigroup Hartford, CT 860-277-3157
Re: Recovery Log
Gill, Geoffrey L. wrote: This morning I noticed my recovery log had risen to 83.2 at some point over the weekend. I'm already doing a full and one incremental backup of the log every day to keep it's size down. As you can see it's only 4GB and I still have room. The real question is, how and why did it get that high in the first place? The previous high had been 39.3%. Is there any way to find out what caused this or exactly when it happened? Hello Gill, you may check the values how long a second version of a file stays in your default-backup-management class . If you count back the time your log-file was so high and you come to the date when 'daylight-saving-time-comes' ... then the reason may be that the date when a lot of files came out again from your server has just passed and you may have a huge expiration process running on this day(s). -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / best regards Rainer Wolf __ Rainer Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: 0731-50-22482 Fax: 0731-50-22471 University of Ulmhttp://www.uni-ulm.de/urz University Computing Center Albert-Einstein-Allee 11 AG Basissysteme 89069 Ulm
Re: Recovery Log
If roll forward mode is not being used, the cause is probably a long transaction in the ADSM database. The exact transaction can be determined with show commands, but it is not easy at all. The easiest way is to look at the oldest running sessions and see which one has been backing up one file or Dbspace for the longest time. 3.2.41 and over Server levels also have an issue when nothing is running the log sometimes will not clear. Jeff Bach -Original Message- From: Gill, Geoffrey L. [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 9:02 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Recovery Log This morning I noticed my recovery log had risen to 83.2 at some point over the weekend. I'm already doing a full and one incremental backup of the log every day to keep it's size down. As you can see it's only 4GB and I still have room. The real question is, how and why did it get that high in the first place? The previous high had been 39.3%. Is there any way to find out what caused this or exactly when it happened? Thanks for the help Available Space (MB): 4,096 Assigned Capacity (MB): 4,096 Maximum Extension (MB): 0 Maximum Reduction (MB): 4,088 Page Size (bytes): 4,096 Total Usable Pages: 1,048,064 Used Pages: 465 Pct Util: 0.0 Max. Pct Util: 83.2 Physical Volumes: 2 Log Pool Pages: 2,048 Log Pool Pct. Util: 0.19 Log Pool Pct. Wait: 0.00 Cumulative Consumption (MB): 34,747.88 Consumption Reset Date/Time: 04/24/01 15:06:46 Geoff Gill TSM Administrator NT Systems Support Engineer SAIC E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (858) 826-4062 Pager: (888) 997-9614 ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error destroy it immediately. **
SAN Data Gateway
Hi We have a SAN Data Gateway 2108-G07 installed. An AIX server is connected through a brocade SAN switch to the SAN Data Gateway. Connected to this Gateway are 4 LTO devices. We seem to have installed the 2108-G07 ok , but nevertheless the LTO drives can not be seen from the AIX server !!? any ideas ?? Does this brocade switch needs to be identified on the SAN Data Gateway (via StorWatch - SAN Data Gateway Specialist software) and the AIX server as well ??? any additional comments ?? thanks in advance Ruud van Ruler, Shell Services International BV - ISES/31 Our Central Data Storage Management home page: http://sww2.shell.com/cdsm/ Room 1B/G01 Dokter van Zeelandstraat 1, 2285 BD Leidschendam NL Tel : +31 (0)70 - 3034644, Fax 4011, Mobile +31 (0)6-55127646 Email Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] R.vanRuler
(auto-response) Re: SAN Data Gateway
Thanks for the mail, I am out of the office, and have limited access to email, until May 24th but will reply to your messages as soon as I can. Have a Great Day!! JWS --- Original message follows --- Hi We have a SAN Data Gateway 2108-G07 installed. An AIX server is connected through a brocade SAN switch to the SAN Data Gateway. Connected to this Gateway are 4 LTO devices. We seem to have installed the 2108-G07 ok , but nevertheless the LTO drives can not be seen from the AIX server !!? any ideas ?? Does this brocade switch needs to be identified on the SAN Data Gateway (via StorWatch - SAN Data Gateway Specialist software) and the AIX server as well ??? any additional comments ?? thanks in advance Ruud van Ruler, Shell Services International BV - ISES/31 Our Central Data Storage Management home page: http://sww2.shell.com/cdsm/ Room 1B/G01 Dokter van Zeelandstraat 1, 2285 BD Leidschendam NL Tel : +31 (0)70 - 3034644, Fax 4011, Mobile +31 (0)6-55127646 Email Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] R.vanRuler
question about TSM 4.1.3 v.s LTO 3581
I upgraded my TSM server from 4.1 to 4.1.3 and I attached LTO 3581 to TSM 4.1.3 I encountered problems in restore my files. (1.) There was nothing happened after I entered restore command . I use q act and I got the log as follows: GENDRV_TAPE0 (\\.\TAPE0) is in use I use q mount and I got the log as follows: ANR8329I LTO volume TP1 is mounted R/W in drive GENDRV_TAPE0 (\\.\TAPE0), status: IDLE. 05/21/2001 19:28:30 ANR8334I 1 volumes found. I use dismount TP1 and I got the log as follows: ANR8499I Command accepted. ANR2017I Administrator ADMIN issued command: QUERY ACTLOG ANR8376E I/O error on drive GENDRV_TAPE0 (\\.\TAPE0) (OP=LOCATE, Error Number=21, CC=0, KEY=02, ASC=04, ASCQ=02, SENSE=70.00.02.00.00.00.00.1C.00.00.00.00.04.0- 2.00.00.10.12.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.FF. FF- .FE.FB.05.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.- 00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0- 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00. 00- .00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00, Description=An undetermined error has occurred). Refer to Appendix D in the 'Messages' manual for recommended action. ANRD pvrntp.c(1825): Error writing EOT to NTP volume TP1. If I close the GUI after I backup or restore , I won't get the error again. What does it mean ? (2.) In TSM server 4.1 , I can see the library volume after I label it , no matter I use command line or server utility . In TSM server 4.1.3 , I have to enter the command CHECKIN libvol lb4.0.0.5 search=yes status=scratch to check it in. Why ? Why ? Why ? Did I do something wrong ? Michael Shu
backup failed
Hi , I got these error log this morning and I don't know what does it mean. Does somebody tell me what's wrong here? 05/16/01 08:50:22 TcpFlush: Error 32 sending data on Tcp/Ip socket 5. 05/16/01 08:50:22 sessRecvVerb: Error -50 from call to 'readRtn'. 05/16/01 08:50:22 TcpFlush: Error 32 sending data on Tcp/Ip socket 5. 05/16/01 08:50:23 TcpFlush: Error 32 sending data on Tcp/Ip socket 5. 05/16/01 08:50:23 sessRecvVerb: Error -50 from call to 'readRtn'. 05/16/01 08:50:23 TcpFlush: Error 32 sending data on Tcp/Ip socket 5. Thanks Michael Hsu
Re: BRM Question
I believe the BMR server is only supported on an HP, AIX, or Solaris platform (Unix). You will need a Unix machine to support BMR. Rod Hroblak ADP --- Mike Glassman - Admin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All, We just had a meeting with our support people for TSM, regarding finishing the project we have. To cut things short, one of the options we required was Bare Metal Restore of NT and Unix servers. Our TSM server sits on an NT server. We were just informed (and this is what I want to ask about) that the BRM server (TSM) module, does not operate if the TSM server is on an NT server. (As I understand from their explanation, there is the TSM server side module and the client module). So in effect, we cannot impliment BRM due to this factor. Does anyone know if this is true ? Mike Glassman System Security Admin Israeli Airports Authority Ben-Gurion Airport http://www.ben-gurion-airport.co.il Tel : 972-3-9710785 Fax : 972-3-9710939 Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usage of this email address or any email address at iaa.gov.il for the purpose of sales pitches, SPAM or any other such unwanted garbage, is illegal, and any person, whether corporate or alone doing so, will be prosecuted to the fullest possible extent. __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices http://auctions.yahoo.com/
restore DB
Hi all, I'm trying to restore my db . I created new db log volumes, formatted them. I have a simple 3590 tapedrive ( 1 drive , 10 slots) but i can not get the database to restore... The tapes are still in the library. I either get the below message. root@gb6ecf03:/usr/tivoli/tsm/server/bin# dsmserv restore db source=DBB todate=today-1 ANR7800I DSMSERV generated at 09:50:09 on Oct 17 2000. Tivoli Storage Manager for AIX-RS/6000 Version 3, Release 7, Level 4.0 Licensed Materials - Property of IBM 5697-TSM (C) Copyright IBM Corporation 1999. All rights reserved. U.S. Government Users Restricted Rights - Use, duplication or disclosure restricted by GSA ADP Schedule Contract with IBM Corporation. ANR0900I Processing options file dsmserv.opt. ANR8200I TCP/IP driver ready for connection with clients on port 1500. ANR0200I Recovery log assigned capacity is 200 megabytes. ANR0201I Database assigned capacity is 600 megabytes. ANR4600I Processing volume history file /usr/tivoli/tsm/server/volhist_gb6ecf0- 3. ANR8324I 3590 volume EC0023 is expected to be mounted (R/O). ANR4620I Database backup series 6 operation 0 device class 3590TAPE. ANR4622I Volume 1: EC0023. ANR4634I Starting point-in-time database restore to date 05/20/01 23:59:59. ANR0300I Recovery log format started; assigned capacity 200 megabytes. ANR0301I Recovery log format in progress; 4 megabytes of 200. ANR0301I Recovery log format in progress; 8 megabytes of 200. ANR0301I Recovery log format in progress; 12 megabytes of 200. ANR0301I Recovery log format in progress; 16 megabytes of 200. ANR0301I Recovery log format in progress; 20 megabytes of 200. ANR0301I Recovery log format in progress; 24 megabytes of 200. ANR0301I Recovery log format in progress; 28 megabytes of 200. ANR0301I Recovery log format in progress; 32 megabytes of 200. ANR0301I Recovery log format in progress; 36 megabytes of 200. ANR0301I Recovery log format in progress; 40 megabytes of 200. ANR0301I Recovery log format in progress; 44 megabytes of 200. ANR0301I Recovery log format in progress; 48 megabytes of 200. ANR0301I Recovery log format in progress; 52 megabytes of 200. ANR0301I Recovery log format in progress; 56 megabytes of 200. ANR0301I Recovery log format in progress; 60 megabytes of 200. ANR0301I Recovery log format in progress; 64 megabytes of 200. ANR0301I Recovery log format in progress; 68 megabytes of 200. ANR8358E Audit operation is required for library 3590LIB. ANR8312E Volume EC0023 could not be located in library 3590LIB. ANR1402W Mount request denied for volume EC0023 - volume unavailable. ANR4578E Database backup/restore terminated - required volume was not mounted. or this one. root@gb6ecf03:/usr/tivoli/tsm/server/bin# dsmserv restore db source=DBB todate=today-1 ANR7800I DSMSERV generated at 09:50:09 on Oct 17 2000. Tivoli Storage Manager for AIX-RS/6000 Version 3, Release 7, Level 4.0 Licensed Materials - Property of IBM 5697-TSM (C) Copyright IBM Corporation 1999. All rights reserved. U.S. Government Users Restricted Rights - Use, duplication or disclosure restricted by GSA ADP Schedule Contract with IBM Corporation. ANR0900I Processing options file dsmserv.opt. ANR8200I TCP/IP driver ready for connection with clients on port 1500. ANR0200I Recovery log assigned capacity is 200 megabytes. ANR0201I Database assigned capacity is 600 megabytes. ANR4600I Processing volume history file /usr/tivoli/tsm/server/volhist_gb6ecf0- 3. ANR8324I 3590 volume EC0023 is expected to be mounted (R/O). ANR4620I Database backup series 6 operation 0 device class 3590TAPE. ANR4622I Volume 1: EC0023. ANR4634I Starting point-in-time database restore to date 05/20/01 23:59:59. ANR0300I Recovery log format started; assigned capacity 200 megabytes. ANRD assd.c(1004): Unexpected result code (15) from pvrAcquireMountPoint. ANRD icstream.c(1595): Error 87 opening input stream. ANRD icrest.c(2070): Rc=6 reading header record. ANR2032E RESTORE DB: Command failed - internal server error detected. root@gb6ecf03:/usr/tivoli/tsm/server/bin# Any ideas anyone ?
Re: SAN Data Gateway
I have experience with McData (rather than Brocade) SAN equipment, but my first guess would be a ZONING issue within the SAN software on the Brocade switch. Our 2108's know nothing about what kind of equipment our SAN has. In fact, our 2108's, our IBM Shark, and all of the individual Fibre Channel clients are all completely unaware of the McData equipment in the middle. All they see is the SCSI equipment at the other end (in their zone). Some servers see disk (from the Shark), some see tape drives (from our LTO library), and our TSM server sees both. Thank you, Jeff Caffey Enterprise Systems Programmer (AIX Storage Administrator) Pier 1 imports, Inc. - Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (817) 252-6222 Fax: (817) 252-7299 -Original Message- From: Van Ruler, Ruud R SSI-ISES-31 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 10:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:SAN Data Gateway Hi We have a SAN Data Gateway 2108-G07 installed. An AIX server is connected through a brocade SAN switch to the SAN Data Gateway. Connected to this Gateway are 4 LTO devices. We seem to have installed the 2108-G07 ok , but nevertheless the LTO drives can not be seen from the AIX server !!? any ideas ?? Does this brocade switch needs to be identified on the SAN Data Gateway (via StorWatch - SAN Data Gateway Specialist software) and the AIX server as well ??? any additional comments ?? thanks in advance Ruud van Ruler, Shell Services International BV - ISES/31 Our Central Data Storage Management home page: http://sww2.shell.com/cdsm/ Room 1B/G01 Dokter van Zeelandstraat 1, 2285 BD Leidschendam NL Tel : +31 (0)70 - 3034644, Fax 4011, Mobile +31 (0)6-55127646 Email Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] R.vanRuler
database backup
Hello all, I currently do on-disk db backups (to a file devclass) of my relatively small (2 gb) database. Full on Saturday, incrementals Sun-Fri. I keep 2 weeks of backups on disk. I need to start implementing an offsite stgpool. Instead of wasting a 100gb LTO tape for the db, i'm thinking about just tarring the on-disk backup to a DDS3 drive. I'll also put vol history and devconfig on the DDS3 tape, and send it offsite with the LTO tapes.. I think it'll be a very long time before the db exceeds the 12gb capacity of DDS3. Anyone see any problems/gotchas with sending the db offsite this way? Thanks, Ray =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Ray DeJean http://www.r-a-y.org Systems Administrator Southeastern Louisiana University IBM Certified Specialist AIX Administration, AIX Support =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Re: SAN Data Gateway
The SAN Data Gateway does not support the LTO. According to IBM you need the SAN Data Router. -Original Message- From: Caffey, Jeff L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 7:53 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: SAN Data Gateway I have experience with McData (rather than Brocade) SAN equipment, but my first guess would be a ZONING issue within the SAN software on the Brocade switch. Our 2108's know nothing about what kind of equipment our SAN has. In fact, our 2108's, our IBM Shark, and all of the individual Fibre Channel clients are all completely unaware of the McData equipment in the middle. All they see is the SCSI equipment at the other end (in their zone). Some servers see disk (from the Shark), some see tape drives (from our LTO library), and our TSM server sees both. Thank you, Jeff Caffey Enterprise Systems Programmer (AIX Storage Administrator) Pier 1 imports, Inc. - Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (817) 252-6222 Fax: (817) 252-7299 -Original Message- From: Van Ruler, Ruud R SSI-ISES-31 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 10:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:SAN Data Gateway Hi We have a SAN Data Gateway 2108-G07 installed. An AIX server is connected through a brocade SAN switch to the SAN Data Gateway. Connected to this Gateway are 4 LTO devices. We seem to have installed the 2108-G07 ok , but nevertheless the LTO drives can not be seen from the AIX server !!? any ideas ?? Does this brocade switch needs to be identified on the SAN Data Gateway (via StorWatch - SAN Data Gateway Specialist software) and the AIX server as well ??? any additional comments ?? thanks in advance Ruud van Ruler, Shell Services International BV - ISES/31 Our Central Data Storage Management home page: http://sww2.shell.com/cdsm/ Room 1B/G01 Dokter van Zeelandstraat 1, 2285 BD Leidschendam NL Tel : +31 (0)70 - 3034644, Fax 4011, Mobile +31 (0)6-55127646 Email Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] R.vanRuler
No Subject
Hi, I am new to this mail list.
So, we installed TSM 3.7.2 on AIX server and TDP for oracle on Server AIX
4.3.2 . We relinked oracle 8.0.6 kernel with MML object :
make -f ins_rdbms.mk LLIBOBK=/usr/lib/libobk.a ioracle (where
/usr/lib/libobk.a symbolicly links to
/usr/tivoli/tsm/client/oracle/bin/libobk.a)
The relink passed, but each time i try to take a backup by RMAN on tape
'SBT_TAPE' the execution stops after rman code compilation phase by logging
errors and i got this piece of message in sbtio.log file undert
$USER_DMP_DEST :
(63706) OBK-sbt:05/21/2001:17:15:57
ReadPswdFromFile():/usr/tivoli/tsm/client/oracle/bin/TDPO.entreprise2
ANS0282E (RC168) Password file is not available.
(63706) OBK-sbt:05/21/2001:17:15:57 odsmSess(): psReadPswd(): oer = 7011,
errno = 168.
(63706) OBK-sbt:05/21/2001:17:15:57 sbtremove(): odsmSess(): ANS0322E
(RC-1) no text available for this return code.
Does anyone ever met this pb.
Note that /usr/tivoli/tsm/client/oracle/bin/TDPO.entreprise2 existsand is
readable (unix permission on file is 644, owned by bin, grouped by bin)
Here is a sample of rman script i use to test tha backup:
---
RMAN run {
allocate channel t1 type 'sbt_tape' parms 'ENV=(DSMO_AVG_SIZE=1000,
DSMI_ORC_CONFIG=/usr/tivoli/tsm/client/api/bin/dsm.sys,
DSMI_LOG=/home/gpfadm/backup,DSMO_NODE=entreprise2)';
backup
filesperset 5
format 'df_%t_%s_%p'
(archivelog all);
}
Thans in advancee.
Amr.
---}{ You can take a horse to the water But you can not make him drink
}{
Re: database backup
Why don't you just define your DDS drive as a device in TSM. That way cut out the extra step. I currently back up the DB during the day (when TSM is for the most part Idle) and backup my OS and config files at night to another tape. That way in the event I lose the TSM server I can get it back online with two tapes. Just define the DDS tape drive as a Manual Drive and your all set. One pit fall in AIX is that you can't have the Unix and Tivoli drivers both set as available at the same time. so I leave the Unix driver as defined in Unix and switch it to available to do the OS backup. Rich Taft Systems Specialist Ricoh Corp Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] .EDUcc: Sent by: Subject: database backup ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] RIST.EDU 05/21/2001 12:12 PM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager Hello all, I currently do on-disk db backups (to a file devclass) of my relatively small (2 gb) database. Full on Saturday, incrementals Sun-Fri. I keep 2 weeks of backups on disk. I need to start implementing an offsite stgpool. Instead of wasting a 100gb LTO tape for the db, i'm thinking about just tarring the on-disk backup to a DDS3 drive. I'll also put vol history and devconfig on the DDS3 tape, and send it offsite with the LTO tapes.. I think it'll be a very long time before the db exceeds the 12gb capacity of DDS3. Anyone see any problems/gotchas with sending the db offsite this way? Thanks, Ray =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Ray DeJean http://www.r-a-y.org Systems Administrator Southeastern Louisiana University IBM Certified Specialist AIX Administration, AIX Support =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
TSM with Win2000 Clustering
Does anyone out there have experience setting up TSM (4.1) to backup a pair of Windows 2000 servers that are clustered...? I really don't want to backup the same data twice if I don't have to... Thank you, Jeff Caffey Enterprise Systems Programmer (AIX Storage Administrator) Pier 1 imports, Inc. - Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (817) 252-6222 Fax: (817) 252-7299
Re: SAN Data Gateway
I have this configuration working with AIX and NT. They can both see the LTO drives. In my case we have a 3584 Library. What release of AIX are you running? Which Fibre Channel card are you using in the RS boxes? - Original Message - From: Van Ruler, Ruud R SSI-ISES-31 [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 11:11 AM Subject: SAN Data Gateway Hi We have a SAN Data Gateway 2108-G07 installed. An AIX server is connected through a brocade SAN switch to the SAN Data Gateway. Connected to this Gateway are 4 LTO devices. We seem to have installed the 2108-G07 ok , but nevertheless the LTO drives can not be seen from the AIX server !!? any ideas ?? Does this brocade switch needs to be identified on the SAN Data Gateway (via StorWatch - SAN Data Gateway Specialist software) and the AIX server as well ??? any additional comments ?? thanks in advance Ruud van Ruler, Shell Services International BV - ISES/31 Our Central Data Storage Management home page: http://sww2.shell.com/cdsm/ Room 1B/G01 Dokter van Zeelandstraat 1, 2285 BD Leidschendam NL Tel : +31 (0)70 - 3034644, Fax 4011, Mobile +31 (0)6-55127646 Email Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] R.vanRuler
TDP for Oracle
hi, You can take a look at what's new chapter in the user manual. http://www.tivoli.com/support/public/Prodman/public_manuals/storage_mgr/admanual.htm#optional regards, Thiha Hi *SM-ers! We currently use TDP for Oracle 2.1.10 and I saw that version 2.2 is available. I would like to know the difference between the two versions so I can advice my Oracle customers to upgrade or not. Can anybody point me to the right direction for this information? Thanks in advance! Kindest regards, Eric van Loon KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
TDP for ORACLE 2.2
Does anybody know where I can download TDP for ORACLE 2.2? On http://www.tivoli.com/support/storage_mgr/adagent.htm I was unable to find the download button. Kind regards Thomas Rupp -- Dieses eMail wurde auf Viren geprueft. Vorarlberger Illwerke AG --
Re: SAN Data Gateway
Why? Jeff Bach Home Office Open Systems Engineering Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. WAL-MART CONFIDENTIAL -Original Message- From: Rosetti, Bill [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 11:23 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: SAN Data Gateway The SAN Data Gateway does not support the LTO. According to IBM you need the SAN Data Router. -Original Message- From: Caffey, Jeff L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 7:53 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: SAN Data Gateway I have experience with McData (rather than Brocade) SAN equipment, but my first guess would be a ZONING issue within the SAN software on the Brocade switch. Our 2108's know nothing about what kind of equipment our SAN has. In fact, our 2108's, our IBM Shark, and all of the individual Fibre Channel clients are all completely unaware of the McData equipment in the middle. All they see is the SCSI equipment at the other end (in their zone). Some servers see disk (from the Shark), some see tape drives (from our LTO library), and our TSM server sees both. Thank you, Jeff Caffey Enterprise Systems Programmer (AIX Storage Administrator) Pier 1 imports, Inc. - Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (817) 252-6222 Fax: (817) 252-7299 -Original Message- From: Van Ruler, Ruud R SSI-ISES-31 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 10:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:SAN Data Gateway Hi We have a SAN Data Gateway 2108-G07 installed. An AIX server is connected through a brocade SAN switch to the SAN Data Gateway. Connected to this Gateway are 4 LTO devices. We seem to have installed the 2108-G07 ok , but nevertheless the LTO drives can not be seen from the AIX server !!? any ideas ?? Does this brocade switch needs to be identified on the SAN Data Gateway (via StorWatch - SAN Data Gateway Specialist software) and the AIX server as well ??? any additional comments ?? thanks in advance Ruud van Ruler, Shell Services International BV - ISES/31 Our Central Data Storage Management home page: http://sww2.shell.com/cdsm/ Room 1B/G01 Dokter van Zeelandstraat 1, 2285 BD Leidschendam NL Tel : +31 (0)70 - 3034644, Fax 4011, Mobile +31 (0)6-55127646 Email Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] R.vanRuler ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error destroy it immediately. **
Re: database backup
OK, I can't say what the DDS3 drive is off the top of my head but if it is something you would have an a potential disaster recovery TSM server, sure it will work... ALSO based on the size of the file dumped to disk, you could always ftp it somewhere else... AND if you have yet another tsm server somewhere, you could back that file up over on the other tsm server. We have moved a tsm environment by backing the db up to disk, ftp'ing the file over to a new server and doing the restore from that ftp'ed file. I JUST LOVE THIS PRODUCT ! Dwight -Original Message- From: Ray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 11:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: database backup Hello all, I currently do on-disk db backups (to a file devclass) of my relatively small (2 gb) database. Full on Saturday, incrementals Sun-Fri. I keep 2 weeks of backups on disk. I need to start implementing an offsite stgpool. Instead of wasting a 100gb LTO tape for the db, i'm thinking about just tarring the on-disk backup to a DDS3 drive. I'll also put vol history and devconfig on the DDS3 tape, and send it offsite with the LTO tapes.. I think it'll be a very long time before the db exceeds the 12gb capacity of DDS3. Anyone see any problems/gotchas with sending the db offsite this way? Thanks, Ray =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Ray DeJean http://www.r-a-y.org Systems Administrator Southeastern Louisiana University IBM Certified Specialist AIX Administration, AIX Support =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Re: TDP for ORACLE 2.2
Thomas, The TDP for are not free. You must order them through your normal channels in order to get Paid in Full licenses. Thanks, Del Del Hoobler IBM Corporation [EMAIL PROTECTED] It's a beautiful day. Don't let it get away. -- Bono Rupp Thomas (Illwerke) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] thomas.rupp@IL cc: LWERKE.ATSubject: TDP for ORACLE 2.2 Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] ST.EDU 05/21/2001 01:44 PM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager Does anybody know where I can download TDP for ORACLE 2.2? On http://www.tivoli.com/support/storage_mgr/adagent.htm I was unable to find the download button. Kind regards Thomas Rupp -- Dieses eMail wurde auf Viren geprueft. Vorarlberger Illwerke AG --
Re: SAN Data Gateway
Not supported...?!?!? Ours works great! We use this to connect our LTO drives to our SAN: IBM 2108-R03 SAN Data Gateway Routers (3) IBM 3584 LTO Ultrium Ultra-Scalable Tape Library (1 library w/5 SCSI drives) McData ED-5000 Director Class Fibre Channel Switch (1) All we had to do is create an LTO Zone on the switch. The only things in that zone are the three SAN Data Gateway Routers and three of the four Fibre Channel Adapters on our TSM server (RS/6000 H80). The other FCA in the TSM server goes to the ED-5000, but it's outside the LTO Zone. Instead of seeing the LTO drives, it sees our Shark... Thank you, Jeff Caffey Enterprise Systems Programmer (AIX Storage Administrator) Pier 1 imports, Inc. - Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (817) 252-6222 Fax: (817) 252-7299 -Original Message- From: Rosetti, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 11:23 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: SAN Data Gateway The SAN Data Gateway does not support the LTO. According to IBM you need the SAN Data Router. -Original Message- From: Caffey, Jeff L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 7:53 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: SAN Data Gateway I have experience with McData (rather than Brocade) SAN equipment, but my first guess would be a ZONING issue within the SAN software on the Brocade switch. Our 2108's know nothing about what kind of equipment our SAN has. In fact, our 2108's, our IBM Shark, and all of the individual Fibre Channel clients are all completely unaware of the McData equipment in the middle. All they see is the SCSI equipment at the other end (in their zone). Some servers see disk (from the Shark), some see tape drives (from our LTO library), and our TSM server sees both. Thank you, Jeff Caffey Enterprise Systems Programmer (AIX Storage Administrator) Pier 1 imports, Inc. - Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (817) 252-6222 Fax: (817) 252-7299 -Original Message- From: Van Ruler, Ruud R SSI-ISES-31 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 10:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:SAN Data Gateway Hi We have a SAN Data Gateway 2108-G07 installed. An AIX server is connected through a brocade SAN switch to the SAN Data Gateway. Connected to this Gateway are 4 LTO devices. We seem to have installed the 2108-G07 ok , but nevertheless the LTO drives can not be seen from the AIX server !!? any ideas ?? Does this brocade switch needs to be identified on the SAN Data Gateway (via StorWatch - SAN Data Gateway Specialist software) and the AIX server as well ??? any additional comments ?? thanks in advance Ruud van Ruler, Shell Services International BV - ISES/31 Our Central Data Storage Management home page: http://sww2.shell.com/cdsm/ Room 1B/G01 Dokter van Zeelandstraat 1, 2285 BD Leidschendam NL Tel : +31 (0)70 - 3034644, Fax 4011, Mobile +31 (0)6-55127646 Email Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] R.vanRuler
How to restore a volume ?
What is the correct procedure of Deleting a volume (such as DLT ) and restoring it back on a new volume with same number ? I'm running into a media fault problem on one of the DLT's while the weekend offsite task is running. The library loads this volume and at one point it detects media fault on that DLT and task stops there and goes in the loop. I would like to delete this volume and get the data back on a new DLT. I'm running ADSM v 3.1.2.40 on Windows NT server SP5. Thanks in advance, Prasanna Prasanna Ghanekar ...OLE_Obj... EDS Pontiac East 2100 S Opdyke Rd MI 48341 *: (248) 972-4547
Re: Keeping COPYPOOL in tact
Which are primary storage pools, which are copy (part seems obvious) which are the next pool(s) for which pool(s) ? ? ? I would just do a upd stg dltpool collocate=yes and let things work themselves out over time... if you must you can do move data commands against tapes in dltpool to speed the collocation process along but normal expiration/reclamation will collocate things eventually. Dwight -Original Message- From: Berning, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 12:17 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Keeping COPYPOOL in tact I am in the process of converting from ADSM 3.1.2.50 to TSM 4.1 I have four storage pools in my server (Diskpool, dltpool, copypool, and tapepool). I would like to destroy the dltpool and recreate it so that I can do co-location on these tapes. What I do not want to do is lose what is currently on the tapepool or copypool. Is this possible? Thomas R. Berning UNIX Systems Administrator 8485 Broadwell Road Cincinnati, OH 45244 Phone: 513-388-2857 Fax: 513-388- Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TDP 3.1 for SAP R/3
I installed TDP 3.1 for SAP R/3 and I have seemingly had an unending amount of problems with it. When installing it the install failed with not enough space even though when we checked everything according to the docs it would. We had to turn off compression because a backup that used to take 3 hours is now taking 20+. After we turned off compression the backups were 5-6 hours. Now I am checking things out on the Administrative Assistant and the backups all say they have failed even though every log we can find says successful. Are we just cursed or has anyone else had these problems? Becky Davidson Data Manager/AIX Administrator EDS/Earthgrains voice: 314-259-7589 fax: 314-877-8589 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to restore a volume ?
What is the correct procedure of Deleting a volume (such as DLT ) and restoring it back on a new volume with same number ? I'm running into a media fault problem on one of the DLT's while the weekend offsite task is running. The library loads this volume and at one point it detects media fault on that DLT and task stops there and goes in the loop. I would like to delete this volume and get the data back on a new DLT. If you have a Copy Storage Pool, what you want to do is a Restore Volume. Lacking that, do Move Data to get as much data off as can be recovered, repeating on as many drives as you have to make a maximal recovery attempt. Beyond that you have no in-server backups of the data and may have to consider it lost. You may want to consider software and/or firmware updates to deal with the loop situation if it really is that. (It may simply be time being taken by the drive to try to re-read the data, making its best effort to retrieve the information.) Richard Sims, BU
TDS 2.1
I have installed TDSfTSM and everything works except that when I try to bring up a Topic in the TDI, I get an error that the Cognos graphics failed. I have built the cubes successfully and can open the reports in Cognos. Any ideas? Seth Forgosh ** This message, including any attachments, contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact sender immediately by reply e-mail and destroy all copies. You are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited. TIAA-CREF **
(auto-response) Re: How to restore a volume ?
Thanks for the mail, I am out of the office, and have limited access to email, until May 24th but will reply to your messages as soon as I can. Have a Great Day!! JWS --- Original message follows --- What is the correct procedure of Deleting a volume (such as DLT ) and restoring it back on a new volume with same number ? I'm running into a media fault problem on one of the DLT's while the weekend offsite task is running. The library loads this volume and at one point it detects media fault on that DLT and task stops there and goes in the loop. I would like to delete this volume and get the data back on a new DLT. I'm running ADSM v 3.1.2.40 on Windows NT server SP5. Thanks in advance, Prasanna Prasanna Ghanekar ...OLE_Obj... EDS Pontiac East 2100 S Opdyke Rd MI 48341 *: (248) 972-4547
Re: SAN Data Gateway
Notice that you have the Routers 2108-R03 and the initial post was for the gateway model 2108-G07. The 2108-R03 are suppported, the 2108-G07 are not. James Thompson From: Caffey, Jeff L. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: SAN Data Gateway Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 13:42:42 -0500 Not supported...?!?!? Ours works great! We use this to connect our LTO drives to our SAN: IBM 2108-R03 SAN Data Gateway Routers (3) IBM 3584 LTO Ultrium Ultra-Scalable Tape Library (1 library w/5 SCSI drives) McData ED-5000 Director Class Fibre Channel Switch (1) All we had to do is create an LTO Zone on the switch. The only things in that zone are the three SAN Data Gateway Routers and three of the four Fibre Channel Adapters on our TSM server (RS/6000 H80). The other FCA in the TSM server goes to the ED-5000, but it's outside the LTO Zone. Instead of seeing the LTO drives, it sees our Shark... Thank you, Jeff Caffey Enterprise Systems Programmer (AIX Storage Administrator) Pier 1 imports, Inc. - Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (817) 252-6222 Fax: (817) 252-7299 -Original Message- From: Rosetti, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 11:23 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: SAN Data Gateway The SAN Data Gateway does not support the LTO. According to IBM you need the SAN Data Router. -Original Message- From: Caffey, Jeff L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 7:53 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: SAN Data Gateway I have experience with McData (rather than Brocade) SAN equipment, but my first guess would be a ZONING issue within the SAN software on the Brocade switch. Our 2108's know nothing about what kind of equipment our SAN has. In fact, our 2108's, our IBM Shark, and all of the individual Fibre Channel clients are all completely unaware of the McData equipment in the middle. All they see is the SCSI equipment at the other end (in their zone). Some servers see disk (from the Shark), some see tape drives (from our LTO library), and our TSM server sees both. Thank you, Jeff Caffey Enterprise Systems Programmer (AIX Storage Administrator) Pier 1 imports, Inc. - Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (817) 252-6222 Fax: (817) 252-7299 -Original Message- From: Van Ruler, Ruud R SSI-ISES-31 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 10:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:SAN Data Gateway Hi We have a SAN Data Gateway 2108-G07 installed. An AIX server is connected through a brocade SAN switch to the SAN Data Gateway. Connected to this Gateway are 4 LTO devices. We seem to have installed the 2108-G07 ok , but nevertheless the LTO drives can not be seen from the AIX server !!? any ideas ?? Does this brocade switch needs to be identified on the SAN Data Gateway (via StorWatch - SAN Data Gateway Specialist software) and the AIX server as well ??? any additional comments ?? thanks in advance Ruud van Ruler, Shell Services International BV - ISES/31 Our Central Data Storage Management home page: http://sww2.shell.com/cdsm/ Room 1B/G01 Dokter van Zeelandstraat 1, 2285 BD Leidschendam NL Tel : +31 (0)70 - 3034644, Fax 4011, Mobile +31 (0)6-55127646 Email Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] R.vanRuler _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
4.1 Server/3.1 Clients
We're getting ready to move our TSM server from an SP node to an H70 (AIX 4.3.3). We are currently at 3.72 on the server and running a mixture of 3.7 and 3.1 clients. Are the 3.1 clients supported under 4.1? Should we go to 3.7.4 instead? Thank you, Maria Ragan
Re: SAN Data Gateway
I have never seen an explanation just the statement. -Original Message- From: Jeff Bach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 9:47 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: SAN Data Gateway Why? Jeff Bach Home Office Open Systems Engineering Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. WAL-MART CONFIDENTIAL -Original Message- From: Rosetti, Bill [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 11:23 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: SAN Data Gateway The SAN Data Gateway does not support the LTO. According to IBM you need the SAN Data Router. -Original Message- From: Caffey, Jeff L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 7:53 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: SAN Data Gateway I have experience with McData (rather than Brocade) SAN equipment, but my first guess would be a ZONING issue within the SAN software on the Brocade switch. Our 2108's know nothing about what kind of equipment our SAN has. In fact, our 2108's, our IBM Shark, and all of the individual Fibre Channel clients are all completely unaware of the McData equipment in the middle. All they see is the SCSI equipment at the other end (in their zone). Some servers see disk (from the Shark), some see tape drives (from our LTO library), and our TSM server sees both. Thank you, Jeff Caffey Enterprise Systems Programmer (AIX Storage Administrator) Pier 1 imports, Inc. - Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (817) 252-6222 Fax: (817) 252-7299 -Original Message- From: Van Ruler, Ruud R SSI-ISES-31 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 10:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:SAN Data Gateway Hi We have a SAN Data Gateway 2108-G07 installed. An AIX server is connected through a brocade SAN switch to the SAN Data Gateway. Connected to this Gateway are 4 LTO devices. We seem to have installed the 2108-G07 ok , but nevertheless the LTO drives can not be seen from the AIX server !!? any ideas ?? Does this brocade switch needs to be identified on the SAN Data Gateway (via StorWatch - SAN Data Gateway Specialist software) and the AIX server as well ??? any additional comments ?? thanks in advance Ruud van Ruler, Shell Services International BV - ISES/31 Our Central Data Storage Management home page: http://sww2.shell.com/cdsm/ Room 1B/G01 Dokter van Zeelandstraat 1, 2285 BD Leidschendam NL Tel : +31 (0)70 - 3034644, Fax 4011, Mobile +31 (0)6-55127646 Email Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] R.vanRuler ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error destroy it immediately. **
Re: TSM with Win2000 Clustering
Jeff: There is a Cluster Redbook SG24-5742-00 It is pretty good, Email me direct and I have a procedure that I have implemented as well. John Stephens www.Storserver.com www.Storsol.com Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wk: 813-265-3707 Fax: 813-265-0095 Tivoli Certified Consultant - ADSM V3+V4 IBM Certified Specialist - AIX Microsoft Certified Professional +3 Netware CNE 5 -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Caffey, Jeff L. Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 12:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: TSM with Win2000 Clustering Does anyone out there have experience setting up TSM (4.1) to backup a pair of Windows 2000 servers that are clustered...? I really don't want to backup the same data twice if I don't have to... Thank you, Jeff Caffey Enterprise Systems Programmer (AIX Storage Administrator) Pier 1 imports, Inc. - Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (817) 252-6222 Fax: (817) 252-7299
Re: SAN Data Gateway
The key there is you are using the router (R03) the Gateway (G07) is not supported. -Original Message- From: Caffey, Jeff L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 10:43 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: SAN Data Gateway Not supported...?!?!? Ours works great! We use this to connect our LTO drives to our SAN: IBM 2108-R03 SAN Data Gateway Routers (3) IBM 3584 LTO Ultrium Ultra-Scalable Tape Library (1 library w/5 SCSI drives) McData ED-5000 Director Class Fibre Channel Switch (1) All we had to do is create an LTO Zone on the switch. The only things in that zone are the three SAN Data Gateway Routers and three of the four Fibre Channel Adapters on our TSM server (RS/6000 H80). The other FCA in the TSM server goes to the ED-5000, but it's outside the LTO Zone. Instead of seeing the LTO drives, it sees our Shark... Thank you, Jeff Caffey Enterprise Systems Programmer (AIX Storage Administrator) Pier 1 imports, Inc. - Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (817) 252-6222 Fax: (817) 252-7299 -Original Message- From: Rosetti, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 11:23 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: SAN Data Gateway The SAN Data Gateway does not support the LTO. According to IBM you need the SAN Data Router. -Original Message- From: Caffey, Jeff L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 7:53 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: SAN Data Gateway I have experience with McData (rather than Brocade) SAN equipment, but my first guess would be a ZONING issue within the SAN software on the Brocade switch. Our 2108's know nothing about what kind of equipment our SAN has. In fact, our 2108's, our IBM Shark, and all of the individual Fibre Channel clients are all completely unaware of the McData equipment in the middle. All they see is the SCSI equipment at the other end (in their zone). Some servers see disk (from the Shark), some see tape drives (from our LTO library), and our TSM server sees both. Thank you, Jeff Caffey Enterprise Systems Programmer (AIX Storage Administrator) Pier 1 imports, Inc. - Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (817) 252-6222 Fax: (817) 252-7299 -Original Message- From: Van Ruler, Ruud R SSI-ISES-31 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 10:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:SAN Data Gateway Hi We have a SAN Data Gateway 2108-G07 installed. An AIX server is connected through a brocade SAN switch to the SAN Data Gateway. Connected to this Gateway are 4 LTO devices. We seem to have installed the 2108-G07 ok , but nevertheless the LTO drives can not be seen from the AIX server !!? any ideas ?? Does this brocade switch needs to be identified on the SAN Data Gateway (via StorWatch - SAN Data Gateway Specialist software) and the AIX server as well ??? any additional comments ?? thanks in advance Ruud van Ruler, Shell Services International BV - ISES/31 Our Central Data Storage Management home page: http://sww2.shell.com/cdsm/ Room 1B/G01 Dokter van Zeelandstraat 1, 2285 BD Leidschendam NL Tel : +31 (0)70 - 3034644, Fax 4011, Mobile +31 (0)6-55127646 Email Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] R.vanRuler
Re: SAN Data Gateway
Are 2109-S16 supported? Jeff Bach Home Office Open Systems Engineering Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. WAL-MART CONFIDENTIAL -Original Message- From: James Thompson [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 2:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: SAN Data Gateway Notice that you have the Routers 2108-R03 and the initial post was for the gateway model 2108-G07. The 2108-R03 are suppported, the 2108-G07 are not. James Thompson From: Caffey, Jeff L. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: SAN Data Gateway Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 13:42:42 -0500 Not supported...?!?!? Ours works great! We use this to connect our LTO drives to our SAN: IBM 2108-R03 SAN Data Gateway Routers (3) IBM 3584 LTO Ultrium Ultra-Scalable Tape Library (1 library w/5 SCSI drives) McData ED-5000 Director Class Fibre Channel Switch (1) All we had to do is create an LTO Zone on the switch. The only things in that zone are the three SAN Data Gateway Routers and three of the four Fibre Channel Adapters on our TSM server (RS/6000 H80). The other FCA in the TSM server goes to the ED-5000, but it's outside the LTO Zone. Instead of seeing the LTO drives, it sees our Shark... Thank you, Jeff Caffey Enterprise Systems Programmer (AIX Storage Administrator) Pier 1 imports, Inc. - Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (817) 252-6222 Fax: (817) 252-7299 -Original Message- From: Rosetti, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 11:23 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: SAN Data Gateway The SAN Data Gateway does not support the LTO. According to IBM you need the SAN Data Router. -Original Message- From: Caffey, Jeff L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 7:53 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: SAN Data Gateway I have experience with McData (rather than Brocade) SAN equipment, but my first guess would be a ZONING issue within the SAN software on the Brocade switch. Our 2108's know nothing about what kind of equipment our SAN has. In fact, our 2108's, our IBM Shark, and all of the individual Fibre Channel clients are all completely unaware of the McData equipment in the middle. All they see is the SCSI equipment at the other end (in their zone). Some servers see disk (from the Shark), some see tape drives (from our LTO library), and our TSM server sees both. Thank you, Jeff Caffey Enterprise Systems Programmer (AIX Storage Administrator) Pier 1 imports, Inc. - Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (817) 252-6222 Fax: (817) 252-7299 -Original Message- From: Van Ruler, Ruud R SSI-ISES-31 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 10:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:SAN Data Gateway Hi We have a SAN Data Gateway 2108-G07 installed. An AIX server is connected through a brocade SAN switch to the SAN Data Gateway. Connected to this Gateway are 4 LTO devices. We seem to have installed the 2108-G07 ok , but nevertheless the LTO drives can not be seen from the AIX server !!? any ideas ?? Does this brocade switch needs to be identified on the SAN Data Gateway (via StorWatch - SAN Data Gateway Specialist software) and the AIX server as well ??? any additional comments ?? thanks in advance Ruud van Ruler, Shell Services International BV - ISES/31 Our Central Data Storage Management home page: http://sww2.shell.com/cdsm/ Room 1B/G01 Dokter van Zeelandstraat 1, 2285 BD Leidschendam NL Tel : +31 (0)70 - 3034644, Fax 4011, Mobile +31 (0)6-55127646 Email Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] R.vanRuler _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the individual or entity to
Re: 4.1 Server/3.1 Clients
They're supported. Of course Tivoli would recommend you upgrade your clients also. At 01:00 PM 5/21/01 -0700, you wrote: We're getting ready to move our TSM server from an SP node to an H70 (AIX 4.3.3). We are currently at 3.72 on the server and running a mixture of 3.7 and 3.1 clients. Are the 3.1 clients supported under 4.1? Should we go to 3.7.4 instead? Thank you, Maria Ragan
Re: SAN Data Gateway
Both the 2108 R03 and G07 are supported. To find the supported configurations for AIX and 3584 visit the following site: http://www.storage.ibm.com/hardsoft/products/tape/tapesupport.htm - this shows that they are supported with a 3584 library. Now the confusion might lie in the fact that the 3580, 3581 and 3583 are only supported with the 2108-R03. This information can be found at: http://www.storage.ibm.com/hardsoft/products/tape/ro3superserver.htm - Original Message - From: Rosetti, Bill [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 4:06 PM Subject: Re: SAN Data Gateway The key there is you are using the router (R03) the Gateway (G07) is not supported. -Original Message- From: Caffey, Jeff L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 10:43 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: SAN Data Gateway Not supported...?!?!? Ours works great! We use this to connect our LTO drives to our SAN: IBM 2108-R03 SAN Data Gateway Routers (3) IBM 3584 LTO Ultrium Ultra-Scalable Tape Library (1 library w/5 SCSI drives) McData ED-5000 Director Class Fibre Channel Switch (1) All we had to do is create an LTO Zone on the switch. The only things in that zone are the three SAN Data Gateway Routers and three of the four Fibre Channel Adapters on our TSM server (RS/6000 H80). The other FCA in the TSM server goes to the ED-5000, but it's outside the LTO Zone. Instead of seeing the LTO drives, it sees our Shark... Thank you, Jeff Caffey Enterprise Systems Programmer (AIX Storage Administrator) Pier 1 imports, Inc. - Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (817) 252-6222 Fax: (817) 252-7299 -Original Message- From: Rosetti, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 11:23 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: SAN Data Gateway The SAN Data Gateway does not support the LTO. According to IBM you need the SAN Data Router. -Original Message- From: Caffey, Jeff L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 7:53 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: SAN Data Gateway I have experience with McData (rather than Brocade) SAN equipment, but my first guess would be a ZONING issue within the SAN software on the Brocade switch. Our 2108's know nothing about what kind of equipment our SAN has. In fact, our 2108's, our IBM Shark, and all of the individual Fibre Channel clients are all completely unaware of the McData equipment in the middle. All they see is the SCSI equipment at the other end (in their zone). Some servers see disk (from the Shark), some see tape drives (from our LTO library), and our TSM server sees both. Thank you, Jeff Caffey Enterprise Systems Programmer (AIX Storage Administrator) Pier 1 imports, Inc. - Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (817) 252-6222 Fax: (817) 252-7299 -Original Message- From: Van Ruler, Ruud R SSI-ISES-31 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 10:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:SAN Data Gateway Hi We have a SAN Data Gateway 2108-G07 installed. An AIX server is connected through a brocade SAN switch to the SAN Data Gateway. Connected to this Gateway are 4 LTO devices. We seem to have installed the 2108-G07 ok , but nevertheless the LTO drives can not be seen from the AIX server !!? any ideas ?? Does this brocade switch needs to be identified on the SAN Data Gateway (via StorWatch - SAN Data Gateway Specialist software) and the AIX server as well ??? any additional comments ?? thanks in advance Ruud van Ruler, Shell Services International BV - ISES/31 Our Central Data Storage Management home page: http://sww2.shell.com/cdsm/ Room 1B/G01 Dokter van Zeelandstraat 1, 2285 BD Leidschendam NL Tel : +31 (0)70 - 3034644, Fax 4011, Mobile +31 (0)6-55127646 Email Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] R.vanRuler
TSM reporting software
Hi all, I'm new to TSM and I'd like to know if anyone knows of any Reporting software for TSM 4.1. I'd appreciate any help on this matter. Ben V. Nuval [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (408) 433-7443 You can take the boy from the island, but you can't take the island from the boy -- 'da kine
Re: SAN Data Gateway
The 2109-S16 is a SAN switch. You connect 2108's, devices with native fibre support, and/or servers to the switch. - Original Message - From: Jeff Bach [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 4:19 PM Subject: Re: SAN Data Gateway Are 2109-S16 supported? Jeff Bach Home Office Open Systems Engineering Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. WAL-MART CONFIDENTIAL -Original Message- From: James Thompson [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 2:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: SAN Data Gateway Notice that you have the Routers 2108-R03 and the initial post was for the gateway model 2108-G07. The 2108-R03 are suppported, the 2108-G07 are not. James Thompson From: Caffey, Jeff L. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: SAN Data Gateway Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 13:42:42 -0500 Not supported...?!?!? Ours works great! We use this to connect our LTO drives to our SAN: IBM 2108-R03 SAN Data Gateway Routers (3) IBM 3584 LTO Ultrium Ultra-Scalable Tape Library (1 library w/5 SCSI drives) McData ED-5000 Director Class Fibre Channel Switch (1) All we had to do is create an LTO Zone on the switch. The only things in that zone are the three SAN Data Gateway Routers and three of the four Fibre Channel Adapters on our TSM server (RS/6000 H80). The other FCA in the TSM server goes to the ED-5000, but it's outside the LTO Zone. Instead of seeing the LTO drives, it sees our Shark... Thank you, Jeff Caffey Enterprise Systems Programmer (AIX Storage Administrator) Pier 1 imports, Inc. - Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (817) 252-6222 Fax: (817) 252-7299 -Original Message- From: Rosetti, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 11:23 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: SAN Data Gateway The SAN Data Gateway does not support the LTO. According to IBM you need the SAN Data Router. -Original Message- From: Caffey, Jeff L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 7:53 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: SAN Data Gateway I have experience with McData (rather than Brocade) SAN equipment, but my first guess would be a ZONING issue within the SAN software on the Brocade switch. Our 2108's know nothing about what kind of equipment our SAN has. In fact, our 2108's, our IBM Shark, and all of the individual Fibre Channel clients are all completely unaware of the McData equipment in the middle. All they see is the SCSI equipment at the other end (in their zone). Some servers see disk (from the Shark), some see tape drives (from our LTO library), and our TSM server sees both. Thank you, Jeff Caffey Enterprise Systems Programmer (AIX Storage Administrator) Pier 1 imports, Inc. - Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (817) 252-6222 Fax: (817) 252-7299 -Original Message- From: Van Ruler, Ruud R SSI-ISES-31 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 10:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:SAN Data Gateway Hi We have a SAN Data Gateway 2108-G07 installed. An AIX server is connected through a brocade SAN switch to the SAN Data Gateway. Connected to this Gateway are 4 LTO devices. We seem to have installed the 2108-G07 ok , but nevertheless the LTO drives can not be seen from the AIX server !!? any ideas ?? Does this brocade switch needs to be identified on the SAN Data Gateway (via StorWatch - SAN Data Gateway Specialist software) and the AIX server as well ??? any additional comments ?? thanks in advance Ruud van Ruler, Shell Services International BV - ISES/31 Our Central Data Storage Management home page: http://sww2.shell.com/cdsm/ Room 1B/G01 Dokter van Zeelandstraat 1, 2285 BD Leidschendam NL Tel : +31 (0)70 - 3034644, Fax 4011, Mobile +31 (0)6-55127646 Email Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Port Number question
Currenlty we do a dbbackup to local DLT media on week days and on the week-end it is done to another remotely located server. I would like to do the backup remotely everyday however bandwidth is a problem. We now have a capability to cap the bandwidth usage to ensure that the dbbackup does not have a negative effect on normal business traffic. However the capping is based upon either or both the IP addresses and ports. Does anyone know if the server to server communication uses a dedicated port (37 712) or a range etc etc? I do not want to restrict any other TSM traffic. Peter Griffin Sydney Water
Re: NT schedule is pending
Any idea... This what I'm getting in dsmsched.log. Note the NT is on the network and client package is installed on the same PC. both of the services are running... 05/21/2001 13:16:07 sessOpen: Failure in communications open call. rc: -50 05/21/2001 16:46:03 TransWin32RC(): Win32 RC 32 from NtSecurityRead(): getSecurityDescriptor() for Owner SID SD 05/21/2001 16:46:03 ANS1228E Sending of object '\\w01520\d$\pagefile.sys' failed 05/21/2001 16:46:03 ANS4007E Error processing '\\w01520\d$\pagefile.sys': access to the object is denied 05/21/2001 16:48:06 ntConsoleEventHandler(): Caught Close console event . 05/21/2001 16:48:06 ntConsoleEventHandler(): Cleaning up and terminating Process ... following is the way the schedule is set Client schedules : SALAM_PC SALAM_PC Policy Domain Name SALAM_PC Schedule Name SALAM_PC Description Salam PC - Sample of NT Backup/Archive Action INCREMENTAL Options -SUB=no Objects c:\0csalam\salam\*.doc Priority1 Start date 2000-01-03 Start time 14:20:00 thanks, Salam Salam R. Abdulla Project Leader Dubai Aluminum Company P. O. Box: 3627 Dubai, UAE Office: +(971-4) 8022965 Mobile: +(97150) 652-8210 Fax: +(971-4) 8846080 -Original Message- From: Richard Sims [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2001 5:17 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: NT schedule is pending I'm trying to add an NT client for the first time. I have downloaded the client packages and installed the client, then changes the dsm.opt files and started the services on NT. The client is working file, which means if I go to client and start backup from GUI of from command line it's working OK. But the automatic schedule is not working, it means I have created policy and schedule and assign it to that client, the schedule stays in pending mode and it does not execute till it failes. I'm getting this error in dsmsched.log. this might not be related to this problem, but anyway.. 05/20/2001 14:36:11 ANS1818E Schedule function not allowed in loop mode. Salam - Loop mode usually refers to invoking the command line client as 'dsmc LOOP', or more simply, 'dsmc', which is to say Interactive Mode. Most likely, this message resulted because the client schedule was defined in the server without operands to make it a useful schedule. Review your client schedule definition in the server according to the action that you really want it to perform, and use Update Schedule to adjust. Richard Sims, BU
Magstar 3570B12 and 3570C12 tapes require
Hi All, I have Magstar 3570B12 and 3570C12, which tapes should I order and what are their capacities? Which on is with the most capacity? itb lscfg -vl rmt2 DEVICELOCATION DESCRIPTION rmt2 30-68-00-4,0 IBM Magstar MP Tape Subsystem ManufacturerIBM Machine Type and Model..03570B12 Serial Number...00020841 Device Specific.(FW)4287 Loadable Microcode LevelA0B00E21 itb lscfg -vl rmt3 DEVICELOCATION DESCRIPTION rmt3 20-68-00-0,0 IBM Magstar MP Tape Subsystem ManufacturerIBM Machine Type and Model..03570C12 Serial Number...000A7487 Device Specific.(FW)5324 Loadable Microcode LevelA0B00E27 Thanks, Salam Salam R. Abdulla Project Leader Dubai Aluminum Company P. O. Box: 3627 Dubai, UAE
