Re: TSM - R3 brbackup/brarchive

2002-07-10 Thread Mahesh Prasad

Hello John,

In the following error message, I can see that you are using 'backup_type'
as 'file' (-t file). In my knowledge, there is no parameter like 'file' to
support backup_type. Can you tell me any reason why you are using
backup_type as file?

BR272E Execution of program '/usr/sap/P05/SYS/exe/run/backint -u P05 -f
backup - i /oracle/P05/sapbackup/.bdijewiy.lst -t file -p
/oracle/P05/817_64/dbs/initP05.utl -c' through pipe failed 

Regards,

Mahesh Prasad
DCM Data Systems Limited
New Delhi, India




Iddon, John
John.Iddon@ATOSOTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RIGIN.COM   cc:
Sent by: ADSM:  Subject: TSM - R3 brbackup/brarchive
Dist Stor
Manager
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.EDU


07/09/2002 08:49
PM
Please respond to
ADSM: Dist Stor
Manager





Hi, has anyone experienced a similar problem to this 

BKI2017I: Blocksize is set to 131072 bytes
BKI0027I: Time: 07/07/2002 00:02:48 Object: 1 of 64 in process:
/oracle/P05/sapd
ata1/temp2_1/temp2.data1 Size: 2040.008 MB, MGMNT-CLASS: BRBACKUPMC1,
TSM-Server
: AOTSM2_SAP .
BKI0027I: Time: 07/07/2002 00:02:51 Object: 2 of 64 in process:
/oracle/P05/sapd
ata3/odsd_10/odsd.data10 Size: 2040.000 MB, MGMNT-CLASS: BRBACKUPMC1,
TSM-Server
: AOTSM2_SAP .
BR266E Program '/usr/sap/P05/SYS/exe/run/backint -u P05 -f backup -i
/oracle/P05
/sapbackup/.bdijewiy.lst -t file -p /oracle/P05/817_64/dbs/initP05.utl -c'
inter
rupted, exit status: b
BR272E Execution of program '/usr/sap/P05/SYS/exe/run/backint -u P05 -f
backup -
i /oracle/P05/sapbackup/.bdijewiy.lst -t file -p
/oracle/P05/817_64/dbs/initP05.
utl -c' through pipe failed
BR280I Time stamp 2002-07-07 00.04.08
BR231E Backup utility call failed

There are no errors in the error log, only a message in the activity log as
follows...
07/07/02   00:04:08  ANR0480W Session 5802 for node NODENAME_SAP (TDP R3
AIX)
  terminated - connection with client severed.

The TDP for SAP is ...
 Interface between SAPDBA Utilities and Tivoli Storage Manager
   - Version 3, Release 2, Level 0.8  for AIX LF -
 Build: 142H  compiled on Dec 13 2001

The TSM servers is...
Tivoli Storage Manager
Command Line Administrative Interface - Version 4, Release 2, Level 1.0
(C) Copyright IBM Corporation, 1990, 2001, All Rights Reserved.

Session established with server AOTSM2: AIX-RS/6000
  Server Version 4, Release 2, Level 1.7
  Server date/time: 09/07/02   15:29:11  Last access: 09/07/02   15:25:00

The SAP tools are at 610 version 11

If the brbackup/brarchive is rerun it works ok, this is an intermittent
failure with both the brbackup and brarchive process and has no pattern.
The backup is LAN free via fabric as this server is running a StorageAgent.
Tivoli are unable to pinpoint the cause of the failure and have suggested
that patch IY22308 be applied, I have not yet applied the patch which fixes
a memory leak in 4.3.3 ML9 as I cannot get the downtime required.

Regards John



Re: reclamation of unavailable primary tapes (was: w/o subject)

2002-07-10 Thread Lars Bebensee

Hi,

First, sorry for sending the message without subject, I guess the human
brain is not supposed to to more than one thing at the same time
(especially mine ;-) ).
I already knew the question of why sending primary tapes offsite will pop
up. The only thing that came to my mind was that the library is not big
enough to hold copies of all the important storage pools. The customer
already uses a DLT-Autochanger as copy destination for some of the primary
storage pools. We are currently busy redesigning the implementation. I am
sure we will not get the customer convinced to buy a bigger library. So
what else could possibly be done to prevent removing tapes from a primary
pool?
The customer's environment consists of:
1x 3575-L18 with 3x3570 (C-Drives)
1x DLT Autochanger 7 Slots with 70GB per tape
Client data is about 800GB

I am not expecting a detailed draft but hints are very welcome

Thanks Lars



On 10.07.2002 03:53:31 ADSM: Dist Stor Manager wrote:

 Lars,

 I do not know what is the idea behind sending primary tapes off-site (DR
 ??) but this does not help at all in case tape gets somehow damaged. You
 will learn it the hard way - when you need to restore from the broken
 tape.
 Migration threshold set to anything between 0 and 100% will not
 force/prevent reclamation. They are just different
 You already gave the answer: update the volumes to readonly or readwrite,
 check them in the library and lower reclamation threshold (in any order).
 BTW: Subjects are very useful to track answers on a mail list with many
 posts (like this one).
 Burak, offsite is for copypool volumes only (look at note 3 for UPD VOL).
 Primary ones have to be unavailable.

 Zlatko Krastev
 IT Consultant




 Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent by:ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 cc:

 Subject:

 yes, you may change the accesses to readwrite and then reclaim but you
 should
 normally use offsite not unavailable access
 regards,
 burak






 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 09.07.2002 16:23
 Please respond to ADSM-L

         To:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
         cc:
         Subject:

 Hi TSM Guys,


 I have a customer who moves volumes from a primary storage pool to an
 offsite location by setting the volumes to UNAVAILABLE. The storage
 pool's migration threshold is set to 100% for spacerclamation to be
 prevented. What do I have to consider if I want to manually start space
 reclamation on the unavailable volumes?
 Will it be enough to just check-in the volumes, change their access to
 ReadWrite, and then start the space reclamation by lowering the
 reclamation
 threshhold gradually?

 Thanx a lot

 Lars







Re: client schedules

2002-07-10 Thread Ramnarayan, Sean A [EDS]

Yes you can

You need to create two different node names and also have two different option files.
You need to create two different scheduler services as well.
Each scheduler service should be independent of the other with the different option 
files.
This should sort your problem out. 
I have done this on our NT servers and it works perfectly.

Thks
Sean Ramnarayan
TSM/UNIX Administrator
EDS (South Africa)


-Original Message-
From: Max Kwong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 11:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: client schedules


Hi all,

Can i create two client schedule at the same dtart time on one client node.
Becase i want to backup two different drive at the same time. I've tried to
create the schedules but one always missing the job. How can l solve it.

Regards,
Max Kwong


MMS caltex.com made the following
 annotations on 07/10/2002 11:56:40 AM
--
DISCLAIMER
This message may contain confidential information that is legally privileged and is 
intended only  for the use of the parties to whom it is addressed. If you are not an 
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution 
or use of any information in this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the message. 
Thank you.

==



Re: TSM storage problem

2002-07-10 Thread kimi

Hello,


may be it's a solution looking at your nodes,
have they enough max. mount points?
Another possibility is the compression, which should be off, to prevent
a mistake in the calculation of the needed storage.

MfG

Michael Kindermann
Network and Systems
IV - Mainpresse  Wuerzburg/Germany

Simeon Johnston wrote:

 We just got a TSM server up and running (still in a testing phase but
 it's running).
 I recently tried to backup a new node I created and got this error -
 ANS1329S Server out of data storage space

 Now, the server only has an 80GB partition for data storage at the
 moment.  That is split into 7 10GB files and one 4GB.
 The 4GB is 95% full but the others are around 30 - 40% full.

 Storage pool info --

 STORAGE   DISK 76,480.0  41.7  41.7
 90  70

 X:\SERVER1\SP1   STORAGE   DISK10,240.0
 34.2 On-Line
 X:\SERVER1\SP2   STORAGE   DISK10,240.0
 41.0 On-Line
 X:\SERVER1\SP3   STORAGE   DISK10,240.0
 37.8 On-Line
 X:\SERVER1\SP4   STORAGE   DISK10,240.0
 34.0 On-Line
 X:\SERVER1\SP5   STORAGE   DISK10,240.0
 31.4 On-Line
 X:\SERVER1\SP6   STORAGE   DISK10,240.0
 39.0 On-Line
 X:\SERVER1\SP7   STORAGE   DISK10,240.0
 49.1 On-Line
 X:\SERVER1\SP8   STORAGE   DISK 4,800.0
 96.4 On-Line

 Why would I get this error if there is more than enough room for a
 backup?
 I'm new to TSM administration so maybe I'm missing something.

 sim
 And keep in mind it could be something REALLY stupid that I just forgot
 about.





optimising tcpwindowsize and tcpbuffsizes

2002-07-10 Thread Chris_Cundall

Hi,

Does any one know a calculation or method for setting/optimising tcpwindowsize and 
tcpbuffsize on Windows 2K machines? 

I have currently set them to :

TCPBUFFSIZE  32
TCPWINDOWSIZE61

But am still getting very slow speeds. Named pipes on the server gives me about 13M a 
second where as TCP gives me about 3M

Any ideas would be greatly appreciated,

Cheers

Chris



Re: TSM storage problem

2002-07-10 Thread Hooft, Jeroen

I saw this before with the API.

Tivoli advised:
- Turn off disk caching in the disk storage pool, and issue   MOVE DATA
commands to each disk pool volume to clear out the cached bitfiles.

Jeroen

-Original Message-
From: Simeon Johnston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 8:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TSM storage problem


We just got a TSM server up and running (still in a testing phase but
it's running).
I recently tried to backup a new node I created and got this error -
ANS1329S Server out of data storage space

Now, the server only has an 80GB partition for data storage at the
moment.  That is split into 7 10GB files and one 4GB.
The 4GB is 95% full but the others are around 30 - 40% full.

Storage pool info --

STORAGE   DISK 76,480.0  41.7  41.7   90  70

X:\SERVER1\SP1   STORAGE   DISK10,240.0
34.2 On-Line
X:\SERVER1\SP2   STORAGE   DISK10,240.0
41.0 On-Line
X:\SERVER1\SP3   STORAGE   DISK10,240.0
37.8 On-Line
X:\SERVER1\SP4   STORAGE   DISK10,240.0
34.0 On-Line
X:\SERVER1\SP5   STORAGE   DISK10,240.0
31.4 On-Line
X:\SERVER1\SP6   STORAGE   DISK10,240.0
39.0 On-Line
X:\SERVER1\SP7   STORAGE   DISK10,240.0
49.1 On-Line
X:\SERVER1\SP8   STORAGE   DISK 4,800.0
96.4 On-Line

Why would I get this error if there is more than enough room for a backup?
I'm new to TSM administration so maybe I'm missing something.

sim
And keep in mind it could be something REALLY stupid that I just forgot
about.



Antwort: AIX Question!

2002-07-10 Thread Alexander Hasel

Hello Basam,

try

find directory -name program* -exec rm {} \;

Regards,
Alex.


Dipl.-Inform.
Alexander Hasel
Geschäftsbereichsleiter
Data Management Solutions

BTB - Betriebswirtschaftliche und -technische Beratungsgesellschaft mbH
Wilhelm-Haas-Straße 6
D-70771 Leinfelden-Echterdingen (Oberaichen)

Tel. +49 (0) 711 - 97 53 - 1 25
Fax +49 (0) 711 - 97 53 - 2 80
eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.btbnet.de




Al'shaebani, Bassam Bassam.Al'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet von: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
10.07.2002 14:26
Bitte antworten an ADSM: Dist Stor Manager

 
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kopie: 
Thema:  AIX Question!


Hello All,
I'm came across an issue yesteday, does anyone know a way around
deleting a large number of files without getting the 'parameter too
long'
message. i.e. I was trying to delete all the file that began with
program*.
There were too many files, so I had to actually cut my search down, to 
something like program01* and so forth, to avoid the error message.
 
Thanks..
 
Regards,
Bassam 



AIX Question!

2002-07-10 Thread Al'shaebani, Bassam

Hello All,
I'm came across an issue yesteday, does anyone know a way around
deleting a large number of files without getting the 'parameter too
long'
message. i.e. I was trying to delete all the file that began with
program*.
There were too many files, so I had to actually cut my search down, to 
something like program01* and so forth, to avoid the error message.

Thanks..

Regards,
Bassam  



adsmpipe and windows NT

2002-07-10 Thread Ran Harel

Hi, All.
I have established successfully adsmpipe on AIX.
But, I need to use it also on windows NT/2000.
Did any of you tried to adjust the sources for compilation on windows
environment ?

Thanks in advance,
Ran



Client error SQL TDP

2002-07-10 Thread Noah Murphy

So I come in this morning and find that one of the database's dropped just
one of the tables and the reported that the schedule finished successfully
but gave this error:
6:30:03 PM ANR0444W Protocol error on session 73263 for node LV2KDB-SQL (TDP
MSSQL NT) - out-of-sequence verb (type Data) received.
 I looked this up and it said  this:
ANR0444W Protocol error on session session number for node client node name
(client platform) - out-of-sequence verb (type verb name) received.
Explanation: The server detects a protocol error on the specified session
because a verb has been received that does not adhere to the client-server
exchange sequence.
System Action: The server ends the client session.
User Response: If the client generating the error is an ADSM client, contact
your service representative. If the client generating the error is an API
client, contact the owner of the API client. If the client generating the
error is a client that you have created using WDSF verbs, correct the
programming error in your client program.
The client was going to be upgraded today to sql tdp2.2.1 but with this I
have some reservations.
HELP
Noah Murphy MCSE
1301 SE 5TH AVE.
Portland OR 97201
503.973.6691
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




NOTICE:  This communication may contain confidential or other privileged information.  
If you are not the intended recipient, or believe that you have received this 
communication in error, please do not print, copy, retransmit, disseminate, or 
otherwise use the information.  Also, please indicate to the sender that you have 
received this email in error, and delete the copy you received.  Any communication 
that does not relate to official Columbia business is that of the sender and is 
neither given nor endorsed by Columbia.  Thank you.



Re: AIX Question!

2002-07-10 Thread Dirk Kastens

Hi,

 I'm came across an issue yesteday, does anyone know a way around
 deleting a large number of files without getting the 'parameter too
 long'
 message. i.e. I was trying to delete all the file that began with
 program*.

What about

find ./ -xdev -type f -name program* -exec rm {} \;

or

for file in `echo program*`; do rm $file; done

Dirk



Re: optimising tcpwindowsize and tcpbuffsizes

2002-07-10 Thread Gianluca Mariani1

Chris,
TCPWINDOWSIZE should be set to 63 on Win2k.
apart from that ,have you tried

TxnGroupMax   256
TxnByteLimit  2097152(for BU direct to LTO or DLT)
TcpNoDelay  yes

and maybe you can take an  instr_client_detail trace and take a look at the
DataVerb figure, see if it's high.

Cordiali saluti
Gianluca Mariani
Tivoli TSM Global Response Team, Roma
Via Sciangai 53, Roma
 phones : +39(0)659664598
   +393351270554 (mobile)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



  Chris_Cundall
  ccundall@SAGITTATo:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  -PS.COM cc:
  Sent by: ADSM:  Subject:  optimising tcpwindowsize and 
tcpbuffsizes
  Dist Stor
  Manager
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  .EDU


  10/07/2002 10:56
  Please respond to
  ADSM: Dist Stor
  Manager





Hi,

Does any one know a calculation or method for setting/optimising
tcpwindowsize and tcpbuffsize on Windows 2K machines?

I have currently set them to :

TCPBUFFSIZE  32
TCPWINDOWSIZE61

But am still getting very slow speeds. Named pipes on the server gives me
about 13M a second where as TCP gives me about 3M

Any ideas would be greatly appreciated,

Cheers

Chris



client schedules

2002-07-10 Thread Max Kwong

Hi all,

Can i create two client schedule at the same dtart time on one client node.
Becase i want to backup two different drive at the same time. I've tried to
create the schedules but one always missing the job. How can l solve it.

Regards,
Max Kwong



command file execution

2002-07-10 Thread Wholey, Joseph (TGA\\MLOL)

An easy one...

When initiating the execution of a command file from the server to the client via 
schedule (the command file resides on client), what breaks the connection between the 
server and the client after the
command file completes execution?  Is it the Idletimeout parm?  Is there another way 
to break the connection after the cmd sched executes?

Regards, Joe



Re: AIX Question!

2002-07-10 Thread Hamish Marson

Al'shaebani, Bassam wrote:

Hello All,
I'm came across an issue yesteday, does anyone know a way around
deleting a large number of files without getting the 'parameter too
long'
message. i.e. I was trying to delete all the file that began with
program*.
There were too many files, so I had to actually cut my search down, to
something like program01* and so forth, to avoid the error message.



That's a shell issue, not necessarily an AIX issue. The problem is that
the shell is responsible for expanding the commandline parameters. Thus
typing *, the shell expands that to ALL the file that match (i.e. all of
them).

For instances like this, there are probably more ways than I have
fingers, but genrally one that will always work is using find. e.g.

find dir -name '*' -exec rm {} \;




Thanks..

Regards,
Bassam




--

I don't suffer from Insanity... | Linux User #16396
I enjoy every minute of it...   |
|
http://www.travellingkiwi.com/  |



Re: AIX Question!

2002-07-10 Thread Andrew Carlson

ls program* | xargs -n 20 rm


Andy Carlson|\  _,,,---,,_
Senior Technical Specialist   ZZZzz /,`.-'`'-.  ;-;;,_
BJC Health Care|,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'
St. Louis, Missouri   '---''(_/--'  `-'\_)
Cat Pics: http://andyc.dyndns.org/animal.html


On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Al'shaebani, Bassam wrote:

 Hello All,
 I'm came across an issue yesteday, does anyone know a way around
 deleting a large number of files without getting the 'parameter too
 long'
 message. i.e. I was trying to delete all the file that began with
 program*.
 There were too many files, so I had to actually cut my search down, to
 something like program01* and so forth, to avoid the error message.

 Thanks..

 Regards,
 Bassam




Expire data on a server that doesnt exist any longer.

2002-07-10 Thread Henrik Wahlstedt

Hello !

If I have backup of a server which is out of production. What can I do and
how, if I want to expire all extra backup copies (versions data exist)
except the last backup (versions data deleted)?
I can change mgmtclass but I still have to do a backup to rebind my files.
If I use a client and log on with 'dsmc -virtualnodename=xyz' and exclude
E:\...\* , what happens then? Will it expire xyz´s E:\ files or the client
node E:\ files?


tia
Henrik

---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.



Re: TSM storage problem

2002-07-10 Thread Simeon Johnston

could you explain this further?  I only have one storage pool at the
moment.  It's using the HD and there isn't any other strg pool to move
the data to.
Since I'm using the HD only HD cacheing would seem to be kinda useless.
 Is there any problem with turning this off?
What about when I add a tape library to it?  Should I have caching on
for that?

sim

Hooft, Jeroen wrote:

I saw this before with the API.

Tivoli advised:
- Turn off disk caching in the disk storage pool, and issue   MOVE DATA
commands to each disk pool volume to clear out the cached bitfiles.

Jeroen





[no subject]

2002-07-10 Thread Mark Stapleton

From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Wu, Jie
 We just got a IBM 3583 LTO library. Currently we have one single
 stgpool for all our Netware, NT, UNIX servers without collocation. But now
 we want to define different a stgpool and set up collocation for
 each OS so
 they have different set of tapes, which may give a little bit better
 performance. My question is what is the best way to migrate data from the
 old stgpool to the new stgpools. Thanks.

If you're running TSM 5.1.0 or greater, you can use the MOVE NODEDATA
command to move a particular client's data to a designated storage pool. If
you're running 4.2 or older, you're only going to be able to collocate all
new backups, not any of the existing data.

Incidentally, once collocation is in place, your restore speeds will be
somewhat faster if you regularly restore large numbers of files. However,
backups will be somewhat slower, because you will have to use tape volumes
dedicated to a particular OS's platforms.


--
Mark Stapleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Certified TSM consultant
Certified AIX system engineer
MCSE



Re: TSM storage problem

2002-07-10 Thread Simeon Johnston

Compression is off.  This is a problem for all the client's I've tested,
which includes a few that were backing up fine.

sim

kimi wrote:

 Hello,


 may be it's a solution looking at your nodes,
 have they enough max. mount points?
 Another possibility is the compression, which should be off, to prevent
 a mistake in the calculation of the needed storage.



Re: optimising tcpwindowsize and tcpbuffsizes

2002-07-10 Thread Gianluca Mariani1

Our official recommendation is for 63. IBM's position on a value 63 is 
Since Windows 2000 supports TCP window scaling, it may be beneficial to use
a larger TCP window size for Windows 2000 systems that are communicating
exclusively with other Windows 2000 or UNIX systems.

Cordiali saluti
Gianluca Mariani
Tivoli TSM Global Response Team, Roma
Via Sciangai 53, Roma
 phones : +39(0)659664598
   +393351270554 (mobile)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



  Dirk Kastens
  Dirk.Kastens@UNI-OSNTo:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  ABRUECK.DE  cc:
  Sent by: ADSM: Dist Subject:  Re: optimising 
tcpwindowsize and tcpbuffsizes
  Stor Manager
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  


  10/07/2002 12:41
  Please respond to
  ADSM: Dist Stor
  Manager





Hi,

 TCPWINDOWSIZE should be set to 63 on Win2k.

No, that's the recommendation for WinNT4. The maximum
value for Win2k is 64 (see the MS knowledge base article
Q224829).
After we set the values for TCPWINDOWSIZE to 64 and the
TCPBUFFSIZE to 512 the throughput of our Win2k clients
has been increased dramatically from 200 kB/s to 4-5 MB/s.

Regards,
Dirk



[no subject]

2002-07-10 Thread Wu, Jie

Dear all,
We just got a IBM 3583 LTO library. Currently we have one single
stgpool for all our Netware, NT, UNIX servers without collocation. But now
we want to define different a stgpool and set up collocation for each OS so
they have different set of tapes, which may give a little bit better
performance. My question is what is the best way to migrate data from the
old stgpool to the new stgpools. Thanks.

Jie



Re: dsm.opt for Windows XP

2002-07-10 Thread Jon Adams

I believe that Douglas wants the user able to restore THEIR files only
(security reasons?). I can't think of a way to do this individually,
especially in a secure fashion. Most organizations use a personal or home
drive. My only suggestion is to request that they keep confidential
information there and rely on that file server backup for recovery.

...last minute thought: unique dsm.opt files for each user (a simple matter
of changing the nodename)? That would also mean using a user ID as the node
name. Though, this seems like an awful lot of work. It may also create
additional license requirements. Not to mention, you'd have to come up with
a script that modified the dsm.opt for each user upon login. Yuk.


Jon Adams
Systems Engineer
IT IPS, Premera Blue Cross


-Original Message-
From: Joshua S. Bassi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 9:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: dsm.opt for Windows XP


Yes, absolutely.  Have them run the dsm program and they will be able to
back and restore data on their own.


--
Joshua S. Bassi
IBM Certified - AIX 4/5L, SAN, Shark
eServer Systems Expert -pSeries HACMP
Tivoli Certified Consultant - ADSM/TSM

Sr. Solutions Architect @ rs-unix.com
An IBM Premier Business Partner
Cell (415) 215-0326

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Douglas Currell
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 4:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: dsm.opt for Windows XP

My organization will be implementing Windows XP
workstations. These workstations could be used by
multiple users. Is there any way for individual users
to backup and restore their own filespaces?


__
Post your ad for free now! http://personals.yahoo.ca



Re: optimising tcpwindowsize and tcpbuffsizes

2002-07-10 Thread Mark Stapleton

From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Gianluca Mariani1
 TCPWINDOWSIZE should be set to 63 on Win2k.

Cordiali saluti
Gianluca Mariani
Tivoli TSM Global Response Team, Roma

You need to check your documentation. Windows 2K machines should have
TCPWINDOWSIZE set to 64 (assuming 10 or 100Mb Ethernet).

I'm somewhat disturbed that a member of the Tivoli TSM Global Response Team
isn't aware of this.

--
Mark Stapleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Certified TSM consultant
Certified AIX system engineer
MCSE



Re: optimising tcpwindowsize and tcpbuffsizes

2002-07-10 Thread Dirk Kastens

Hi,

 TCPWINDOWSIZE should be set to 63 on Win2k.

No, that's the recommendation for WinNT4. The maximum
value for Win2k is 64 (see the MS knowledge base article
Q224829).
After we set the values for TCPWINDOWSIZE to 64 and the
TCPBUFFSIZE to 512 the throughput of our Win2k clients
has been increased dramatically from 200 kB/s to 4-5 MB/s.

Regards,
Dirk



Re: Delayed Schedule Start

2002-07-10 Thread Jon Adams

Perhaps a combination of the randomization, the backup window or the
available sessions at the time of backup?  If there are no sessions
available, the backup will start anytime a session is available within that
schedule window.

Jon Adams
Systems Engineer
IT IPS, Premera Blue Cross

-Original Message-
From: Etienne Brodeur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 11:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Delayed Schedule Start


What's your Schedule Randomization percentage and what is the backup
window for this schedule?  If I recall correctly randomization is for
every schedule even if it only runs on one node.  And the ramdomization
starts from the moment the nodes connect to the server not from the start
of the window.

backup window is 4 hours.
schedule starts at 1 AM
randomization is set to 25%
node connects at 230 AM
schedules will start between 230 and 330 AM.

Could this be it?

Etienne Brodeur




Martin, Jon R. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
07/09/2002 01:33 PM
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Delayed Schedule Start


The below schedule was scheduled for 1 PM.  The client scheduler
is
polling and at 1:05 PM it updated, and said the schedule would start in 33
minutes.  What causes a schedule to execute a time later than scheduled? I
am aware of staggered starts for scheduled events, but this is the only
thing scheduled at this time and nothing else is running on the server.
Any
ideas?

Thanks,
Jon Martin


Policy Domain Name: SOLARIS
Schedule Name: REBUILD_MR
Description: Daily backup for Solaris Clients
Action: Incremental
Options:
Objects: /rebuild_mr/ATX1/
Priority: 1
Start Date/Time: 05/16/01   13:00:00
Duration: 12 Hour(s)
Period: 1 Day(s)
Day of Week: Tuesday
Expiration:
Last Update by (administrator): ADMIN
Last Update Date/Time: 07/09/02   10:57:07
Managing profile:



07/09/02   13:05:12

07/09/02   13:05:12 Schedule Name: REBUILD_MR
07/09/02   13:05:12 Action:Incremental
07/09/02   13:05:12 Objects:   /rebuild_mr/ATX1/
07/09/02   13:05:12 Options:
07/09/02   13:05:12 Server Window Start:   13:00:00 on 07/09/02
07/09/02   13:05:12

07/09/02   13:05:12 Command will be executed in 33 minutes.
07/09/02   13:05:12



Re: AIX Question!

2002-07-10 Thread Kai Hintze

Just be aware that find will also go down subdirectories, so if you have
files with similar names in lower levels that you want to keep you have to
find another way. If there are no subdirs, or if the subdirs don't have
similar names then find works great.

Someone mentioned xargs. xargs works great and was faster in a test I saw
(but we are only talking fractions of a second per 1000 files :).

Another way is to ls filespec  delthem. Then edit delthem and put rm in
front of every line. (Hint: in vi use :%s/^/rm /). This gives you very fine
control, but is slowest.

There are perl scripts (and I'm sure REXX, python, etc) that wrap around rm
and read the directory to handle large directories.

I could go on, but

Have fun!
Kai.

-Original Message-
From: Hamish Marson
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 7/10/02 8:15 AM
Subject: Re: AIX Question!

Al'shaebani, Bassam wrote:

Hello All,
I'm came across an issue yesteday, does anyone know a way around
deleting a large number of files without getting the 'parameter too
long'
message. i.e. I was trying to delete all the file that began with
program*.
There were too many files, so I had to actually cut my search down, to
something like program01* and so forth, to avoid the error message.



That's a shell issue, not necessarily an AIX issue. The problem is that
the shell is responsible for expanding the commandline parameters. Thus
typing *, the shell expands that to ALL the file that match (i.e. all of
them).

For instances like this, there are probably more ways than I have
fingers, but genrally one that will always work is using find. e.g.

find dir -name '*' -exec rm {} \;




Thanks..

Regards,
Bassam




--

I don't suffer from Insanity... | Linux User #16396
I enjoy every minute of it...   |
|
http://www.travellingkiwi.com/  |



restore asking for offsite copy instead of primary

2002-07-10 Thread Blair, Georgia

I had a user trying to restore a database and found data unavailable to
server. The restore was asking for a volume that was offsite. Why wouldn't
it ask for the primary copy and how do I know what primary volume the data
is on?



Thanks,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: client schedules

2002-07-10 Thread Thomas Denier

 Can i create two client schedule at the same dtart time on one client node.
 Becase i want to backup two different drive at the same time. I've tried to
 create the schedules but one always missing the job. How can l solve it.

If your server and client are at TSM 3.7 or later you can use the
resourceutilization parameter to get multiple concurrent backups under
the control of a single schedule.



Re: restore asking for offsite copy instead of primary

2002-07-10 Thread Remeta, Mark

maybe the primary copy is marked unavailable... do a q vol  f=d to
see..

nnn=volume number


-Original Message-
From: Blair, Georgia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 12:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: restore asking for offsite copy instead of primary


I had a user trying to restore a database and found data unavailable to
server. The restore was asking for a volume that was offsite. Why wouldn't
it ask for the primary copy and how do I know what primary volume the data
is on?



Thanks,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Confidentiality Note: The information transmitted is intended only for the
person or entity to whom or which it is addressed and may contain
confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission,
dissemination or other use of this information by persons or entities other
than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you receive this in error,
please delete this material immediately.



kodak support

2002-07-10 Thread Reiss David IT751

We are looking at signing a support for some of our tape librarys.  The
company that will really be doing the support is Eastman Kodak as the
nation-wide authorized service provider.

Does anybody have experience with Kodak doing the support for tape
libraries, and if so, good or bad opinions of them?

Thanks,

David N. Reiss
TSM Support Engineer
Siemens Westinghouse Power Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
407-736-3912



Re: TSM 4.1.1 on MS Windows 2K Cluster

2002-07-10 Thread Jon Adams

No.  I get ANS1084E No files have previously been backed up for 'drive:*'.


I did modify the dsm.opt for the cluster resource name. By default, the
dsm.opt (as opposed to a dsm_custom.opt) is read by the DSM or DSMC
utilities, so it must be changed to enable the correct node ID to restore
from, if other than the default node. I can't think of another way to
request a restore from a virtual node, such as a cluster resource.

-Original Message-
From: Mark Stapleton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 05, 2002 8:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM 4.1.1 on MS Windows 2K Cluster


From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Jon Adams
 Though I have successfully implemented the TSM Client solution on our
 clustered servers, I do not appear to have the ability to restore them via
 GUI.  From the GUI, any cluster shared resources DO NOT appear anywhere.
 Obviously, it's difficult to restore something you can't see.  I
 have indeed
 verified that the client has been getting it's daily backups and that the
 file spaces do exist on the server.

 If anyone can shed some light on this, I would really appreciate it.

Can you see the backups if you run the backup from the command-line
interface, like this:

dsmc restore drive:\foo\bar\* -subdir=yes -pick


If you're after point-in-time restores, the line is

dsmc restore drive:\foo\bar\* -subdir=yes -pick -ina

(Gotta love that pick option!)

From the closing-the-barn-door-after-the-horse-gets-out department, did you
ever successflly run test restores on a periodic basis?

--
Mark Stapleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Certified TSM consultant
Certified AIX system engineer
MCSE



Re: optimising tcpwindowsize and tcpbuffsizes

2002-07-10 Thread Gianluca Mariani1

I refer to our position as on the perf site. that is what I consider
official as those are the recommendations of the perf team based on real
tests. as I wrote in the other post.
I'll quote again:

TCP/IP Window Size


Use the Tivoli Storage Manager option TcpWindowSize 63 on both the Tivoli
Storage Manager Windows NT client and Tivoli Storage Manager Windows NT
server. Since Windows 2000 supports TCP window scaling, it may be
beneficial to use a larger TCP window size for Windows 2000 systems that
are communicating exclusively with other Windows 2000 or UNIX systems.





Why?


Because the maximum tcpwindowsize WITHOUT RFC 1323 (scaling windowsize
support) is 65535 bytes, that's 64KB -1. TSM option tcpwindowsize 64 means
64*1024 or 65536 - one byte too big if the client doesn't support RFC 1323.
win2000 does support rfc1323, but you have to set a registry entry to take
advantage of it. the tcp windowsize sets the SO_RCVBUF option on the socket
connection, which is the size of the total data buffered on the connection.
MS docs say this size needs to be a multiple of the MTU for best results,
but this is basically garbage.  For standard Ethernet MTU of 1500 bytes,
the difference in the number of packets that can be buffered between 63KB
and 64KB is a nit. There is a difference between saying 64KB and meaning
65535 bytes.





this does not mean that you can't put the parameter to 64 and actually see
an improvement. I gave a general answer. I would be more careful with
absolute assertions in this field.


I'm somewhat disturbed that a certified TSM consultant is not aware of
this.







Cordiali saluti
Gianluca Mariani
Tivoli TSM Global Response Team, Roma
Via Sciangai 53, Roma
 phones : +39(0)659664598
   +393351270554 (mobile)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



  Mark Stapleton
  stapleto@BERBEE.To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  COM cc:
  Sent by: ADSM:  Subject:  Re: optimising tcpwindowsize 
and tcpbuffsizes
  Dist Stor
  Manager
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  .EDU


  10/07/2002 15:35
  Please respond to
  ADSM: Dist Stor
  Manager





From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Gianluca Mariani1
 TCPWINDOWSIZE should be set to 63 on Win2k.

Cordiali saluti
Gianluca Mariani
Tivoli TSM Global Response Team, Roma

You need to check your documentation. Windows 2K machines should have
TCPWINDOWSIZE set to 64 (assuming 10 or 100Mb Ethernet).

I'm somewhat disturbed that a member of the Tivoli TSM Global Response Team
isn't aware of this.

--
Mark Stapleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Certified TSM consultant
Certified AIX system engineer
MCSE



Re: restore asking for offsite copy instead of primary

2002-07-10 Thread Mark Stapleton

From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Blair, Georgia
 I had a user trying to restore a database and found data unavailable to
 server. The restore was asking for a volume that was offsite. Why wouldn't
 it ask for the primary copy and how do I know what primary volume the data
 is on?

Read the server activity log to see which primary pool tape it was trying to
get. Once you've got the volume number, check the status and storage pool of
the tape (Q VOL F=D) and its physical location (Q LIBV).

If it is a primary tape pool volume, and if it is physically in the library,
it may have gotten set to an incorrect status (thus the OFFSITE)
designation. Update its status to READWRITE, and you should be good to go.

--
Mark Stapleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Certified TSM consultant
Certified AIX system engineer
MCSE



Re: restore asking for offsite copy instead of primary

2002-07-10 Thread Blair, Georgia

I probably didn't make this clear I don't know the primary volume # or how
to find it. The restore requested a volume that was physically offsite in
the vault. I would think it would ask for the primary copy.

-Original Message-
From: Remeta, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 11:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: restore asking for offsite copy instead of primary


maybe the primary copy is marked unavailable... do a q vol  f=d to
see..

nnn=volume number


-Original Message-
From: Blair, Georgia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 12:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: restore asking for offsite copy instead of primary


I had a user trying to restore a database and found data unavailable to
server. The restore was asking for a volume that was offsite. Why wouldn't
it ask for the primary copy and how do I know what primary volume the data
is on?



Thanks,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Confidentiality Note: The information transmitted is intended only for the
person or entity to whom or which it is addressed and may contain
confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission,
dissemination or other use of this information by persons or entities other
than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you receive this in error,
please delete this material immediately.



Re: TSM storage problem

2002-07-10 Thread Simeon Johnston

so far 
Checked cacheing.  It's off and has been off since it was installed.
There is only one storage pool which is 41% util.
This was working fine just a few days ago.  There was no changes done by
me (The only admin).
The max. mount point = 1 for most clients.  I didn't change or set this
so I'm kind of assuming this is the way it's been all along.  Since it
worked great before I don't know why it would cause a problem now.  What
is the recomended setting for this so as not to cause conflicts w/ anything?

The same error is coming up accross multiple policy domains (2 domains
setup to go to the same storage pool).
I finally decided that I just wanted to get it running as I am doing
some testing so I deleted the data for the largest node.  This didn't
help any even though the storage pool is now down to 19% util.

I'm really confused and irritated by this

sim



Re: Antwort: AIX Question!

2002-07-10 Thread Zlatko Krastev

find directory pattern | xargs rm
This would be faster if really many files have to be processed.

Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant




Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by:ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: 

Subject:Antwort: AIX Question!

Hello Basam,

try

find directory -name program* -exec rm {} \;

Regards,
Alex.


Dipl.-Inform.
Alexander Hasel
Geschäftsbereichsleiter
Data Management Solutions

BTB - Betriebswirtschaftliche und -technische Beratungsgesellschaft mbH
Wilhelm-Haas-Straße 6
D-70771 Leinfelden-Echterdingen (Oberaichen)

Tel. +49 (0) 711 - 97 53 - 1 25
Fax +49 (0) 711 - 97 53 - 2 80
eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.btbnet.de




Al'shaebani, Bassam Bassam.Al'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet von: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
10.07.2002 14:26
Bitte antworten an ADSM: Dist Stor Manager

 
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kopie: 
Thema:  AIX Question!


Hello All,
I'm came across an issue yesteday, does anyone know a way around
deleting a large number of files without getting the 'parameter too
long'
message. i.e. I was trying to delete all the file that began with
program*.
There were too many files, so I had to actually cut my search down, to 
something like program01* and so forth, to avoid the error message.
 
Thanks..
 
Regards,
Bassam 



Re: TSM DBBackup

2002-07-10 Thread Bill Wheeler

Here is the scenario that I was planning if I can get the DBBackup to go to
a flat file.

Run nightly archive to LTO device
Run DBBackup to flat file located on rootvg of AIX box
Run Mksysb of rootvg to 4mm tape.

If this is sufficient, my only other question is how do you restore the
DBBackup, is it the same as if you are restoring it from a tape?

Bill Wheeler
PDM Administrator

-Original Message-
From: Michael Benjamin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 9:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM DBBackup

Hi Alex,

If you've tarred the file to LTO, how do you utilise it quickly? It's almost
easier to let TSM perform the dbbackup to LTO, and then you have a dbbackup
volume you can utilise straight away.

The dbbackup takes a few minutes to complete, time is a non-issue here.

Yes it's a shame you have to waste a lot of space on the dbbackup volume,
but
it's the same type of volume and that's worth a lot...

I guess you have to work out how much your data is worth, if it's more than
about
$1000 AU then it's definately worth buying some more tape volumes to rotate
your
DB offsite. The DB is simply too important to mess around with and lose...
that single
volume represents the entire contents of your server, if you lose that and
your db/mirrors
on the filesystems your 10,000 tapes aren't worth a thing to you come
recovery time they
are just a massive collection of ones and zeros...

Mike.

 -Original Message-
 From: Alex Paschal [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 1:26 AM
 To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject:  Re: TSM DBBackup

 You can do a dbbackup devc=file_class, which will put the dbbackup into a
 file on disk.  The only thing is you'd then have to script a process that
 somehow backs up that file, or do it manually.  Possibilities include:

 FTP to remote site
 tar to 4mm tape
 tar to LTO

 Personally, I'd rather not run so tight on scratches that I don't have 7
 tapes I can spare for dbbackups.

 Alex

 -Original Message-
 From: Bill Wheeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 6:30 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: TSM DBBackup


 Currently we run our archive to a Magstar 3570 tape subsystem.  Once the
 archive is complete we run the DBBackup to a new 3570 scratch tape.  The
 issue is that the DBBackup is so small at this point; we are looking at
 options to find a way to back it up differently.  On an LTO tape we might
 us
 1 to 2 GB, and cannot see wasting 98 GB (uncompressed).  If we could put
 both the archive and DBBackup on one cartridge that is the way we would
 go.
 If not, can the DBBackup be put to a flat file where it can be restored
 from?  We would like to make sure it is the same type of tape volume that
 we
 are using, we just want to make sure that it is cost effective.

 Bill Wheeler
 PDM Administrator

 -Original Message-
 From: Michael Benjamin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Sunday, July 07, 2002 9:23 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: TSM DBBackup

 At the end of the day, sometimes it's easier to go to the same type of
 tape
 volume.

 For example, if you have a DR situation, you will need to source another
 library/tape drive
 if your DB exists on another form of tape volume. This is a very poor
 approach when time
 is of the essence in the recovery situation. Same goes if your secondary
 drive/library fails,
 you will need to start backing up to the LTO anyway, multiple points of
 failure.

 Secondly, the LTO will write the DB very quickly to tape and continue on
 it's merry way.
 You can also track these tapes with the same library, and rotate say 7
 dbbackups offsite and
 expire them for maximum safety, how cool is that?

 Cutting corners to save a couple of bucks makes no sense at all when the
 aim
 is the security
 of your data. A few hundred bucks of tape is worthwhile...

 Mike.

  -Original Message-
  From: Bill Wheeler [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Friday, July 05, 2002 10:22 PM
  To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject:  TSM DBBackup
 
  Hello *SMers,
 
 
 
  I have a couple of questions.  We are possible moving to an
  LTO
  drive in the near future.   I am trying to determine how to do a TSM
  backup
  without sending it to a separate cartridge.  Our DBbackup is small and
 do
  not see a reason to use such a large cartridge, do anyone have an idea?
 
 
 
  Can it be sent to the same cartridge?
 
  Can I create a flat file and back that up?
 
 
 
 
 
  These are the few questions that I need an answer for, if any one could
  help
  me out.
 
 
 
  Thanks,
 
 
 
  Bill Wheeler
 
  PDM Administrator
 
  La-Z-Boy Incorporated
 
  (734) 242-1444 x 6170
 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 **
 Bunnings Legal Disclaimer:

 1)  This document is confidential and may contain legally privileged
 information. If you are not the intended recipient, you 

AIX restore from one client to another

2002-07-10 Thread Anderson, Michael - HMIS

I want to be able to restore directories from a production client to
a test client. I know with the other platforms you
 just put the other clients node name in the path, but being unfamiliar
with AIX I was not sure if this would be the same.
 I have not tried this yet, just looking for some direction. This is how
I assume it would go:

 restore nodeA /usr/xyz/* -su=yes nodeB/usr/xyz/

 I guess my question is, is this possible and do I have the right
syntax.

 Any help would be appreciated

 Mike Anderson
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]




CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments,
is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential
and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or
distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original
message.



Re: AIX restore from one client to another

2002-07-10 Thread Haskins, Mike

Enter the following on nodeB provided that nodeA has granted access with the set 
access command:

restore -fromn=nodeA /usr/xyz/* /usr/xyz/

Mike Haskins
Agway, Inc

-Original Message-
From: Anderson, Michael - HMIS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 3:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: AIX restore from one client to another


I want to be able to restore directories from a production client to
a test client. I know with the other platforms you
 just put the other clients node name in the path, but being unfamiliar
with AIX I was not sure if this would be the same.
 I have not tried this yet, just looking for some direction. This is how
I assume it would go:

 restore nodeA /usr/xyz/* -su=yes nodeB/usr/xyz/

 I guess my question is, is this possible and do I have the right
syntax.

 Any help would be appreciated

 Mike Anderson
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]




CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments,
is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential
and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or
distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original
message.



Re: TSM storage problem

2002-07-10 Thread David Longo

Start a schedule for a node that fails.  When it fails then grab the actlog
for the time when it failed and the dsmsched.log from the client node.
If it's not obvious from that, then post segment of each here and we'll
take another look.

Remember to include specific versions of TSM server, client and OS
levels of each.



David B. Longo
System Administrator
Health First, Inc.
3300 Fiske Blvd.
Rockledge, FL 32955-4305
PH  321.434.5536
Pager  321.634.8230
Fax:321.434.5525
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/10/02 02:27PM 
so far 
Checked cacheing.  It's off and has been off since it was installed.
There is only one storage pool which is 41% util.
This was working fine just a few days ago.  There was no changes done by
me (The only admin).
The max. mount point = 1 for most clients.  I didn't change or set this
so I'm kind of assuming this is the way it's been all along.  Since it
worked great before I don't know why it would cause a problem now.  What
is the recomended setting for this so as not to cause conflicts w/ anything?

The same error is coming up accross multiple policy domains (2 domains
setup to go to the same storage pool).
I finally decided that I just wanted to get it running as I am doing
some testing so I deleted the data for the largest node.  This didn't
help any even though the storage pool is now down to 19% util.

I'm really confused and irritated by this

sim



MMS health-first.org made the following
 annotations on 07/10/2002 03:36:57 PM
--
This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain confidential, 
proprietary, or legally privileged information.  No confidentiality or privilege is 
waived or lost by any mistransmission.  If you receive this message in error, please 
immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies 
of it, and notify the sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, 
distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended 
recipient.  Health First reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications 
through its networks.  Any views or opinions expressed in this message are solely 
those of the individual sender, except (1) where the message states such views or 
opinions are on behalf of a particular entity;  and (2) the sender is authorized by 
the entity to give such views or opinions.

==



Re: AIX restore from one client to another

2002-07-10 Thread Justin Bleistein

or -virtualnode=

works if you know node-a's password of course.

--Justin Richard Bleistein




  Haskins, Mike
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  OM  cc:
  Sent by: ADSM:  Subject:  Re: AIX restore from one 
client to another
  Dist Stor
  Manager
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  .EDU


  07/10/2002 03:26
  PM
  Please respond to
  ADSM: Dist Stor
  Manager






Enter the following on nodeB provided that nodeA has granted access with
the set access command:

restore -fromn=nodeA /usr/xyz/* /usr/xyz/

Mike Haskins
Agway, Inc

-Original Message-
From: Anderson, Michael - HMIS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 3:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: AIX restore from one client to another


I want to be able to restore directories from a production client
to
a test client. I know with the other platforms you
 just put the other clients node name in the path, but being unfamiliar
with AIX I was not sure if this would be the same.
 I have not tried this yet, just looking for some direction. This is
how
I assume it would go:

 restore nodeA /usr/xyz/* -su=yes nodeB/usr/xyz/

 I guess my question is, is this possible and do I have the right
syntax.

 Any help would be appreciated

 Mike Anderson
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]




CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments,
is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential
and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or
distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original
message.



Expiration question.

2002-07-10 Thread PINNI, BALANAND (SBCSI)

All-

Please help me understand this issue. The issue is expiration takes place
,but how
do I confirm its working ok.

I see files get marked in backup schedule and gets deleted as per parameters
,but
still how to verify all goes well?

One of the node has more tapes occupied than other even if the data size is
same on
both nodes on same TSM Server.

Balanand Pinni
SBC Services Inc.
Work:314-206-5911
Pager:1-800-451-6897
Email ID :[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] e.mail pager



Re: TSM DBBackup

2002-07-10 Thread Bill Wheeler

How do you define where the flat file goes while the DBBackup is running?

Bill Wheeler
PDM Administrator

-Original Message-
From: Prather, Wanda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 3:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM DBBackup

Yes, TSM DB restore is the same no matter if you are restoring from disk or
tape.

If you rely on TSM to restore the DB itself, it looks in the volhistory file
to find the last good DB backup.
It will see the pointer in volhistory to the disk file and use it.
(I recommend you put a copy of devconfig and volhistory in your rootvg,
also.)

If you specify yourself which volume TSM uses for the DB restore, you just
give it the name of the file.

It all works.

-Original Message-
From: Bill Wheeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 3:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM DBBackup


Here is the scenario that I was planning if I can get the DBBackup to go to
a flat file.

Run nightly archive to LTO device
Run DBBackup to flat file located on rootvg of AIX box
Run Mksysb of rootvg to 4mm tape.

If this is sufficient, my only other question is how do you restore the
DBBackup, is it the same as if you are restoring it from a tape?

Bill Wheeler
PDM Administrator

-Original Message-
From: Michael Benjamin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 9:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM DBBackup

Hi Alex,

If you've tarred the file to LTO, how do you utilise it quickly? It's almost
easier to let TSM perform the dbbackup to LTO, and then you have a dbbackup
volume you can utilise straight away.

The dbbackup takes a few minutes to complete, time is a non-issue here.

Yes it's a shame you have to waste a lot of space on the dbbackup volume,
but
it's the same type of volume and that's worth a lot...

I guess you have to work out how much your data is worth, if it's more than
about
$1000 AU then it's definately worth buying some more tape volumes to rotate
your
DB offsite. The DB is simply too important to mess around with and lose...
that single
volume represents the entire contents of your server, if you lose that and
your db/mirrors
on the filesystems your 10,000 tapes aren't worth a thing to you come
recovery time they
are just a massive collection of ones and zeros...

Mike.

 -Original Message-
 From: Alex Paschal [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 1:26 AM
 To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject:  Re: TSM DBBackup

 You can do a dbbackup devc=file_class, which will put the dbbackup into a
 file on disk.  The only thing is you'd then have to script a process that
 somehow backs up that file, or do it manually.  Possibilities include:

 FTP to remote site
 tar to 4mm tape
 tar to LTO

 Personally, I'd rather not run so tight on scratches that I don't have 7
 tapes I can spare for dbbackups.

 Alex

 -Original Message-
 From: Bill Wheeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 6:30 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: TSM DBBackup


 Currently we run our archive to a Magstar 3570 tape subsystem.  Once the
 archive is complete we run the DBBackup to a new 3570 scratch tape.  The
 issue is that the DBBackup is so small at this point; we are looking at
 options to find a way to back it up differently.  On an LTO tape we might
 us
 1 to 2 GB, and cannot see wasting 98 GB (uncompressed).  If we could put
 both the archive and DBBackup on one cartridge that is the way we would
 go.
 If not, can the DBBackup be put to a flat file where it can be restored
 from?  We would like to make sure it is the same type of tape volume that
 we
 are using, we just want to make sure that it is cost effective.

 Bill Wheeler
 PDM Administrator

 -Original Message-
 From: Michael Benjamin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Sunday, July 07, 2002 9:23 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: TSM DBBackup

 At the end of the day, sometimes it's easier to go to the same type of
 tape
 volume.

 For example, if you have a DR situation, you will need to source another
 library/tape drive
 if your DB exists on another form of tape volume. This is a very poor
 approach when time
 is of the essence in the recovery situation. Same goes if your secondary
 drive/library fails,
 you will need to start backing up to the LTO anyway, multiple points of
 failure.

 Secondly, the LTO will write the DB very quickly to tape and continue on
 it's merry way.
 You can also track these tapes with the same library, and rotate say 7
 dbbackups offsite and
 expire them for maximum safety, how cool is that?

 Cutting corners to save a couple of bucks makes no sense at all when the
 aim
 is the security
 of your data. A few hundred bucks of tape is worthwhile...

 Mike.

  -Original Message-
  From: Bill Wheeler [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Friday, July 05, 2002 10:22 PM
  To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject:  TSM DBBackup
 
  Hello *SMers,
 
 
 
  

Re: TSM DBBackup

2002-07-10 Thread Prather, Wanda

Yes, TSM DB restore is the same no matter if you are restoring from disk or
tape.

If you rely on TSM to restore the DB itself, it looks in the volhistory file
to find the last good DB backup.
It will see the pointer in volhistory to the disk file and use it.
(I recommend you put a copy of devconfig and volhistory in your rootvg,
also.)

If you specify yourself which volume TSM uses for the DB restore, you just
give it the name of the file.

It all works.

-Original Message-
From: Bill Wheeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 3:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM DBBackup


Here is the scenario that I was planning if I can get the DBBackup to go to
a flat file.

Run nightly archive to LTO device
Run DBBackup to flat file located on rootvg of AIX box
Run Mksysb of rootvg to 4mm tape.

If this is sufficient, my only other question is how do you restore the
DBBackup, is it the same as if you are restoring it from a tape?

Bill Wheeler
PDM Administrator

-Original Message-
From: Michael Benjamin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 9:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM DBBackup

Hi Alex,

If you've tarred the file to LTO, how do you utilise it quickly? It's almost
easier to let TSM perform the dbbackup to LTO, and then you have a dbbackup
volume you can utilise straight away.

The dbbackup takes a few minutes to complete, time is a non-issue here.

Yes it's a shame you have to waste a lot of space on the dbbackup volume,
but
it's the same type of volume and that's worth a lot...

I guess you have to work out how much your data is worth, if it's more than
about
$1000 AU then it's definately worth buying some more tape volumes to rotate
your
DB offsite. The DB is simply too important to mess around with and lose...
that single
volume represents the entire contents of your server, if you lose that and
your db/mirrors
on the filesystems your 10,000 tapes aren't worth a thing to you come
recovery time they
are just a massive collection of ones and zeros...

Mike.

 -Original Message-
 From: Alex Paschal [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 1:26 AM
 To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject:  Re: TSM DBBackup

 You can do a dbbackup devc=file_class, which will put the dbbackup into a
 file on disk.  The only thing is you'd then have to script a process that
 somehow backs up that file, or do it manually.  Possibilities include:

 FTP to remote site
 tar to 4mm tape
 tar to LTO

 Personally, I'd rather not run so tight on scratches that I don't have 7
 tapes I can spare for dbbackups.

 Alex

 -Original Message-
 From: Bill Wheeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 6:30 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: TSM DBBackup


 Currently we run our archive to a Magstar 3570 tape subsystem.  Once the
 archive is complete we run the DBBackup to a new 3570 scratch tape.  The
 issue is that the DBBackup is so small at this point; we are looking at
 options to find a way to back it up differently.  On an LTO tape we might
 us
 1 to 2 GB, and cannot see wasting 98 GB (uncompressed).  If we could put
 both the archive and DBBackup on one cartridge that is the way we would
 go.
 If not, can the DBBackup be put to a flat file where it can be restored
 from?  We would like to make sure it is the same type of tape volume that
 we
 are using, we just want to make sure that it is cost effective.

 Bill Wheeler
 PDM Administrator

 -Original Message-
 From: Michael Benjamin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Sunday, July 07, 2002 9:23 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: TSM DBBackup

 At the end of the day, sometimes it's easier to go to the same type of
 tape
 volume.

 For example, if you have a DR situation, you will need to source another
 library/tape drive
 if your DB exists on another form of tape volume. This is a very poor
 approach when time
 is of the essence in the recovery situation. Same goes if your secondary
 drive/library fails,
 you will need to start backing up to the LTO anyway, multiple points of
 failure.

 Secondly, the LTO will write the DB very quickly to tape and continue on
 it's merry way.
 You can also track these tapes with the same library, and rotate say 7
 dbbackups offsite and
 expire them for maximum safety, how cool is that?

 Cutting corners to save a couple of bucks makes no sense at all when the
 aim
 is the security
 of your data. A few hundred bucks of tape is worthwhile...

 Mike.

  -Original Message-
  From: Bill Wheeler [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Friday, July 05, 2002 10:22 PM
  To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject:  TSM DBBackup
 
  Hello *SMers,
 
 
 
  I have a couple of questions.  We are possible moving to an
  LTO
  drive in the near future.   I am trying to determine how to do a TSM
  backup
  without sending it to a separate cartridge.  Our DBbackup is small and
 do
  not see a reason to use such a large 

Re: TSM DBBackup

2002-07-10 Thread Prather, Wanda

You have to start out by creating a DEVCLASS with devtype=file.
That specifies the directory you want the file sent to.

Here's an example:
DEFINE DEVCLASS dbbkuptodisk   DEVTYPE=FILE FORMAT=DRIVE MAXCAPACITY=204800K
MOUNTLIMIT=1 DIRECTORY=/var/adsmpool SHARED=NO

dbbkuptodisk is a made up name, use anything you like.
MAXCAPACITY should be large enough to hold one DBBACKUP (although the DB
backup will work OK if TSM has to break it into pieces).

Then when you do your DB backup, it should look like this:

backup db type=full devclass=dbbkuptodisk scratch=yes

TSM will create, on the fly, a new file in the /var/adsmpool directory to
contain the db backup.
If the db backup is larger than maxcapacity, TSM will create a more file and
the db backup will span the two files.
You can find out what TSM calls the file by looking in the activity log or
in the volumehistory file.
(Or just looking in the directory)

The older db backups go away when you run DELETE VOLHISTORY (same as if your
DB backups were going to tape).



-Original Message-
From: Bill Wheeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 4:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM DBBackup


How do you define where the flat file goes while the DBBackup is running?

Bill Wheeler
PDM Administrator

-Original Message-
From: Prather, Wanda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 3:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM DBBackup

Yes, TSM DB restore is the same no matter if you are restoring from disk or
tape.

If you rely on TSM to restore the DB itself, it looks in the volhistory file
to find the last good DB backup.
It will see the pointer in volhistory to the disk file and use it.
(I recommend you put a copy of devconfig and volhistory in your rootvg,
also.)

If you specify yourself which volume TSM uses for the DB restore, you just
give it the name of the file.

It all works.

-Original Message-
From: Bill Wheeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 3:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM DBBackup


Here is the scenario that I was planning if I can get the DBBackup to go to
a flat file.

Run nightly archive to LTO device
Run DBBackup to flat file located on rootvg of AIX box
Run Mksysb of rootvg to 4mm tape.

If this is sufficient, my only other question is how do you restore the
DBBackup, is it the same as if you are restoring it from a tape?

Bill Wheeler
PDM Administrator

-Original Message-
From: Michael Benjamin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 9:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM DBBackup

Hi Alex,

If you've tarred the file to LTO, how do you utilise it quickly? It's almost
easier to let TSM perform the dbbackup to LTO, and then you have a dbbackup
volume you can utilise straight away.

The dbbackup takes a few minutes to complete, time is a non-issue here.

Yes it's a shame you have to waste a lot of space on the dbbackup volume,
but
it's the same type of volume and that's worth a lot...

I guess you have to work out how much your data is worth, if it's more than
about
$1000 AU then it's definately worth buying some more tape volumes to rotate
your
DB offsite. The DB is simply too important to mess around with and lose...
that single
volume represents the entire contents of your server, if you lose that and
your db/mirrors
on the filesystems your 10,000 tapes aren't worth a thing to you come
recovery time they
are just a massive collection of ones and zeros...

Mike.

 -Original Message-
 From: Alex Paschal [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 1:26 AM
 To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject:  Re: TSM DBBackup

 You can do a dbbackup devc=file_class, which will put the dbbackup into a
 file on disk.  The only thing is you'd then have to script a process that
 somehow backs up that file, or do it manually.  Possibilities include:

 FTP to remote site
 tar to 4mm tape
 tar to LTO

 Personally, I'd rather not run so tight on scratches that I don't have 7
 tapes I can spare for dbbackups.

 Alex

 -Original Message-
 From: Bill Wheeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 6:30 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: TSM DBBackup


 Currently we run our archive to a Magstar 3570 tape subsystem.  Once the
 archive is complete we run the DBBackup to a new 3570 scratch tape.  The
 issue is that the DBBackup is so small at this point; we are looking at
 options to find a way to back it up differently.  On an LTO tape we might
 us
 1 to 2 GB, and cannot see wasting 98 GB (uncompressed).  If we could put
 both the archive and DBBackup on one cartridge that is the way we would
 go.
 If not, can the DBBackup be put to a flat file where it can be restored
 from?  We would like to make sure it is the same type of tape volume that
 we
 are using, we just want to make sure that it is cost effective.

 Bill Wheeler
 PDM Administrator

 -Original Message-
 From: 

Re: Expiration question.

2002-07-10 Thread PINNI, BALANAND (SBCSI)

Thanks David ,Thanks for your quick reply.
What happens to me is as long as every thing goes ok I don't disturb
anything. But I feel curious sometimes what's going on?
Tapes get reclaimed and expiration goes through .If this is ok then why one
of my node shows 15 tapes occupied.
For just 2 versions to keep with not much data to backup. How can I
guarantee that its ok?

Thanks



Balanand Pinni
SBC Services Inc.
Work:314-206-5911
Pager:1-800-451-6897
Email ID :[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] e.mail pager





-Original Message-
From: David Longo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 3:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Expiration question.


A quick way is to monitor expiration while it is running with q process.
You can see that objects are being deleted.  If it runs during the night
then the next day do a q actlog begind=-1 sea=expiration and see
the summary when it finishes as to how much was deleted.

(Note: The number of objects deleted does not correspond
to the number of files deleted/expired).

Doing comparisons between nodes and how much tape is used
doesn't always even up as we think it might, partially due to how
TSM aggreagtes files. etc.



David B. Longo
System Administrator
Health First, Inc.
3300 Fiske Blvd.
Rockledge, FL 32955-4305
PH  321.434.5536
Pager  321.634.8230
Fax:321.434.5525
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/10/02 03:25PM 
All-

Please help me understand this issue. The issue is expiration takes place
,but how
do I confirm its working ok.

I see files get marked in backup schedule and gets deleted as per parameters
,but
still how to verify all goes well?

One of the node has more tapes occupied than other even if the data size is
same on
both nodes on same TSM Server.

Balanand Pinni
SBC Services Inc.
Work:314-206-5911
Pager:1-800-451-6897
Email ID :[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] e.mail pager



MMS health-first.org made the following
 annotations on 07/10/2002 04:39:30 PM

--
This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain
confidential, proprietary, or legally privileged information.  No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.  If
you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all
copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it, and notify the
sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute,
print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
recipient.  Health First reserves the right to monitor all e-mail
communications through its networks.  Any views or opinions expressed in
this message are solely those of the individual sender, except (1) where the
message states such views or opinions are on behalf of a particular entity;
and (2) the sender is authorized by the entity to give such views or
opinions.


==



Re: TSM DBBackup

2002-07-10 Thread Bill Wheeler

Can you specify any directory that you want to or is it specific to the
/var/adsmpool directory?

Bill Wheeler
PDM Administrator

-Original Message-
From: Prather, Wanda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 4:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM DBBackup

You have to start out by creating a DEVCLASS with devtype=file.
That specifies the directory you want the file sent to.

Here's an example:
DEFINE DEVCLASS dbbkuptodisk   DEVTYPE=FILE FORMAT=DRIVE MAXCAPACITY=204800K
MOUNTLIMIT=1 DIRECTORY=/var/adsmpool SHARED=NO

dbbkuptodisk is a made up name, use anything you like.
MAXCAPACITY should be large enough to hold one DBBACKUP (although the DB
backup will work OK if TSM has to break it into pieces).

Then when you do your DB backup, it should look like this:

backup db type=full devclass=dbbkuptodisk scratch=yes

TSM will create, on the fly, a new file in the /var/adsmpool directory to
contain the db backup.
If the db backup is larger than maxcapacity, TSM will create a more file and
the db backup will span the two files.
You can find out what TSM calls the file by looking in the activity log or
in the volumehistory file.
(Or just looking in the directory)

The older db backups go away when you run DELETE VOLHISTORY (same as if your
DB backups were going to tape).



-Original Message-
From: Bill Wheeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 4:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM DBBackup


How do you define where the flat file goes while the DBBackup is running?

Bill Wheeler
PDM Administrator

-Original Message-
From: Prather, Wanda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 3:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM DBBackup

Yes, TSM DB restore is the same no matter if you are restoring from disk or
tape.

If you rely on TSM to restore the DB itself, it looks in the volhistory file
to find the last good DB backup.
It will see the pointer in volhistory to the disk file and use it.
(I recommend you put a copy of devconfig and volhistory in your rootvg,
also.)

If you specify yourself which volume TSM uses for the DB restore, you just
give it the name of the file.

It all works.

-Original Message-
From: Bill Wheeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 3:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM DBBackup


Here is the scenario that I was planning if I can get the DBBackup to go to
a flat file.

Run nightly archive to LTO device
Run DBBackup to flat file located on rootvg of AIX box
Run Mksysb of rootvg to 4mm tape.

If this is sufficient, my only other question is how do you restore the
DBBackup, is it the same as if you are restoring it from a tape?

Bill Wheeler
PDM Administrator

-Original Message-
From: Michael Benjamin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 9:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM DBBackup

Hi Alex,

If you've tarred the file to LTO, how do you utilise it quickly? It's almost
easier to let TSM perform the dbbackup to LTO, and then you have a dbbackup
volume you can utilise straight away.

The dbbackup takes a few minutes to complete, time is a non-issue here.

Yes it's a shame you have to waste a lot of space on the dbbackup volume,
but
it's the same type of volume and that's worth a lot...

I guess you have to work out how much your data is worth, if it's more than
about
$1000 AU then it's definately worth buying some more tape volumes to rotate
your
DB offsite. The DB is simply too important to mess around with and lose...
that single
volume represents the entire contents of your server, if you lose that and
your db/mirrors
on the filesystems your 10,000 tapes aren't worth a thing to you come
recovery time they
are just a massive collection of ones and zeros...

Mike.

 -Original Message-
 From: Alex Paschal [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 1:26 AM
 To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject:  Re: TSM DBBackup

 You can do a dbbackup devc=file_class, which will put the dbbackup into a
 file on disk.  The only thing is you'd then have to script a process that
 somehow backs up that file, or do it manually.  Possibilities include:

 FTP to remote site
 tar to 4mm tape
 tar to LTO

 Personally, I'd rather not run so tight on scratches that I don't have 7
 tapes I can spare for dbbackups.

 Alex

 -Original Message-
 From: Bill Wheeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 6:30 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: TSM DBBackup


 Currently we run our archive to a Magstar 3570 tape subsystem.  Once the
 archive is complete we run the DBBackup to a new 3570 scratch tape.  The
 issue is that the DBBackup is so small at this point; we are looking at
 options to find a way to back it up differently.  On an LTO tape we might
 us
 1 to 2 GB, and cannot see wasting 98 GB (uncompressed).  If we could put
 both the archive and DBBackup on one cartridge that is the way we would
 

Re: Expiration question.

2002-07-10 Thread David Longo

A quick way is to monitor expiration while it is running with q process.
You can see that objects are being deleted.  If it runs during the night
then the next day do a q actlog begind=-1 sea=expiration and see
the summary when it finishes as to how much was deleted.

(Note: The number of objects deleted does not correspond
to the number of files deleted/expired).

Doing comparisons between nodes and how much tape is used
doesn't always even up as we think it might, partially due to how
TSM aggreagtes files. etc.



David B. Longo
System Administrator
Health First, Inc.
3300 Fiske Blvd.
Rockledge, FL 32955-4305
PH  321.434.5536
Pager  321.634.8230
Fax:321.434.5525
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/10/02 03:25PM 
All-

Please help me understand this issue. The issue is expiration takes place
,but how
do I confirm its working ok.

I see files get marked in backup schedule and gets deleted as per parameters
,but
still how to verify all goes well?

One of the node has more tapes occupied than other even if the data size is
same on
both nodes on same TSM Server.

Balanand Pinni
SBC Services Inc.
Work:314-206-5911
Pager:1-800-451-6897
Email ID :[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] e.mail pager



MMS health-first.org made the following
 annotations on 07/10/2002 04:39:30 PM
--
This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain confidential, 
proprietary, or legally privileged information.  No confidentiality or privilege is 
waived or lost by any mistransmission.  If you receive this message in error, please 
immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies 
of it, and notify the sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, 
distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended 
recipient.  Health First reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications 
through its networks.  Any views or opinions expressed in this message are solely 
those of the individual sender, except (1) where the message states such views or 
opinions are on behalf of a particular entity;  and (2) the sender is authorized by 
the entity to give such views or opinions.

==



Re: Need TSM 3.7

2002-07-10 Thread Gene Greenberg

I'm not sure if there is another solution because I didn't encounter this
last week when I upgraded to 5.1, but I'm pretty sure I have a copy of 3.7
for AIX.  You can contact me if you don't find another solution.

Gene Greenberg Jr.
Lead, System Administrator, DBA, SMA
512-464-5162
Round Rock ISD
Round Rock TX



  Ray Pratts
  ray.pratts@MARKITo:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  IISYS.COM   cc:
  Sent by: ADSM:  Subject:  Need TSM 3.7
  Dist Stor
  Manager
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  .EDU


  07/10/02 03:27 PM
  Please respond to
  ADSM: Dist Stor
  Manager






Can I obtain TSM  3.7 Server for AIX.  I have a system that I was about to
upgrade to TSM 5.1.  Well crashed and I need to restore the TSM database
with 3.7 before I can upgrade.  Any ideas.  Thanks.


Ray Pratts
Senior Systems Engineer
Mark III Systems, Inc
6575 West Loop South, Suite 675
Bellaire, TX 77401
713-664-9850 ext. 29



New TSM client on AS400???

2002-07-10 Thread Etienne Brodeur

Hello everyone,

I was browsing the Tivoli web page and saw this in the list of TSM
client v5.1:


http://www.tivoli.com/products/index/storage-mgr/platforms.html

Tivoli Storage Manager, Version 5.1 clients:
AIX 4.3.3 or AIX 5L for POWER, Version 5.1
HP/UX with 32-bit and 11.0 and 11I with 64-bit
Linux/x86 7 (2.4 kernel): Red Hat 7.1 or 7.2; SuSe 7.1,7.2 or 7.3,
TurboLinux 7.0
Linux/390 7 (2.4 kernel), SuSe 7.0
Macintosh 9.1, X(10).x
Novell NetWare 5.1, 6
S/390, Version 2, Release 9 or 10 with SMP/E; z/OS Version 1, Release 1;
or z/OS, Version 1, Release 2
OS/400 5.1
SGI IRIX UNIX, Release 6.5 with EFS or XFS File Systems
Sun Solaris 2.6, 7, 8 (32-bit) or Solaris 7, 8 (64-bit)
Tru64 UNIX, Version 5.1 or 5.1A
Windows XP, ME; Windows 2000 Professional, Server, Advanced Server and
DataCenter; Windows NT 4.0 SP5, SP6a


Does this mean there's a new TSM client for OS/400 that runs on V5R1?  And
if so do you guys know how it works?  (ie is it still with BRMS and the
API?)

Any and all info about TSM on AS400 would be greatly appreciated!

P.S. I also read somewhere that TDP for Domino was supported on
AS400!!??!!

Etienne Brodeur



Re: TSM storage problem

2002-07-10 Thread Simeon Johnston

That's what I had thought also.  The people who set it up (set it up for
us while training us etc) said it didn't matter either.
If the licensing package was not installed can it be installed
afterwards?  There is an option to install the licensing package
(something like that.  It's not too clear on exactly what it's for) but
I don't want to screw up what I already have setup.

Even the sales rep that sold it to us said the licensing wasn't necessary.
Funky...

sim

Gerald Wichmann wrote:

To my knowledge, licensing doesn't matter. I have had many servers in the
past run for quite some time before I bothered licensing them and a server
here that continues to run without registering the licenses. It gripes about
being uncompliant in the activity log however no functionality has been
disabled. It will be interesting if indeed that's the problem as either I
was wrong or Tivoli changed it and made licensing matter. The thing with
licensing is all the license files are on the base cd so it doesn't really
know whether you paid for them or not. It would be easy for you to check if
this is your problem assuming you installed the license package/lpp's simply
by doing a reg lic file=mgsyslan.lic number=1  or however many you want to
license for the number parameter. Then do a q lic to see if it's
compliant.

But it does indeed look like that's your problem based on the definition of
that ANR.. looks like you found your problem.





How to determine Backupset Size

2002-07-10 Thread Firmes, Stephen

Does anybody know how to see the size of a Backupset?  When the backupset is completed 
you get a message stating how many files, but no sizes.

ANR3501I Backup set for TEST_BOX as TEST.9549550 completed successfully - processed 
2,348 files.

TSM 4.2.1.9
Solaris 8

Thanks.

Stephen Firmes 
TSM Engineer
Tivoli Certified TSM Consultant
StorageNetworks, Inc
Work:  781-622-6287
http://www.storagenetworks.com



adic scalar 100; TSM devices

2002-07-10 Thread Rick W

under the smitty menu in the TSM devices menu I am having a difficult time
trying to figure out how come AIX isnt seeing the library.  Any reason why
it wouldnt see the library under smit but it does see the 2 tape drives
rmt0 and 1??  A friend of mine said the drives would have to be daisy
chained togeither for it to see the drives.. is this true? How do I daisy
chain them so that TSM can see the library.

R.



Session Lost Problem

2002-07-10 Thread Jonathan Martineau

Here my problem.  On backup, the session get lost.

Setup Server : TSM Server Version 4, Release 2, Level 2.0 ( Windows Version NT 4.0 )
Setup Client : TSM Novell NetWare( Ver. 4.11 ) Backup-Archive ClientVersion 4 
Release 1, Level 3

Here a log example :

07/09/2002 23:43:08 --- SCHEDULEREC OBJECT BEGIN BACKUP_23_45 07/09/2002 23:45:00
...
07/10/2002 01:28:55 ANS1809E Session is lost; initializing session reopen procedure.
07/10/2002 01:29:15 ... failed
07/10/2002 01:34:16 ANS1809E Session is lost; initializing session reopen procedure.
07/10/2002 01:34:37 ... successful
07/10/2002 01:34:44 --- SCHEDULEREC STATUS BEGIN
07/10/2002 01:34:44
07/10/2002 01:34:44
07/10/2002 01:34:44 Total number of objects inspected:   48,465
07/10/2002 01:34:44 Total number of objects backed up:  386
07/10/2002 01:34:44 Total number of objects updated: 73
07/10/2002 01:34:44 Total number of objects rebound:  0
07/10/2002 01:34:44 Total number of objects deleted:  0
07/10/2002 01:34:44 Total number of objects expired: 85
07/10/2002 01:34:44 Total number of objects failed:   0
07/10/2002 01:34:44 Total number of bytes transferred:69.37 MB
07/10/2002 01:34:44 Data transfer time:5,064.39 sec
07/10/2002 01:34:44 Network data transfer rate:   14.02 KB/sec
07/10/2002 01:34:44 Aggregate data transfer rate: 10.61 KB/sec
07/10/2002 01:34:44 Objects compressed by:   14%
07/10/2002 01:34:44 Elapsed processing time:   01:51:34
07/10/2002 01:34:44 --- SCHEDULEREC STATUS END
07/10/2002 01:34:44 ANS1369W Session Rejected: The session was canceled by the server 
administrator.

07/10/2002 01:34:44 --- SCHEDULEREC OBJECT END BACKUP_23_45 07/09/2002 23:45:00
...
07/10/2002 01:34:44 ANS1512E Scheduled event 'BACKUP_23_45' failed.  Return code = 4.
07/10/2002 01:34:44 Sending results for scheduled event 'BACKUP_23_45'.
07/10/2002 01:34:45 Results sent to server for scheduled event 'BACKUP_23_45'.


Here the connexion setting from dsm.opt


COMMMETHODTCPip
TCPSERVERADDRESS 10.10.10.10
TCPPORT1500
compression yes
LARGECOMmbuffers YES
tcpbuffsize 64
tcpwindowsize 64
txnbytelimit 2097152


Here the dsmserv.opt

TCPNODELAY YES
TXNGroupmax 256
COMMTimeout 600
IDLETimeout 60


Sometime i get more than one ANS1809E Session is lost - Successful   before i get a 
reopen procedure failed.
I always get a  ANS1369W Session Rejected: The session was canceled by the server 
administrator after that. 

I read somewhere that putting a higher number for the COMMTimeout ( 600 sec ) and 
IDLETimeout ( 60 mins ) can
resolve my problem..

But is't really all i can do ?  I've found nothing about SESSION Timeout.. 
How can I set my connexion ?

Can you help me ? Im a little green with TSM right now, but i try to figure it all.  
RTFM is my motto, but the boss here
don't seems to have the time I need to read it all ... If you can push me on the right 
direction..


Thx



Backup a W2K Domain Controller?

2002-07-10 Thread Jon Adams

Here's an interesting question:  why would you want to backup a DC,
especially where you have a DC (W2K) or two in every remote site of the WAN?
Why/what would you ever restore that you wouldn't get from the other domain
controllers if one or even a few are down?

I ask this because my theory is when in doubt, backup it up.  At a couple
hundred dollars a license it seems a reasonable assurance policy (depending
on the budget, of course).  Another theory applies here as well, backup
everything, exclude only as needed, even if that client options set gets
pretty big.


Jon R. Adams
IT IPS BST Infrastructure
Premera Blue Cross
Mountlake Terrace, WA
425-670-5770
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Need TSM 3.7

2002-07-10 Thread Andy Raibeck

I would be remiss if I didn't caution against doing anything that might
violate the TSM licensing agreement.

Ray, while 3.7 is no longer supported, I would recommend that you contact
your IBM rep for assistance if you have lost your original installation
media.

Regards,

Andy

Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/IBM@IBMUS
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (change eye to i to reply)

The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The command line is your friend.
Good enough is the enemy of excellence.




Gene Greenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
07/10/2002 13:58
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager


To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: Need TSM 3.7



I'm not sure if there is another solution because I didn't encounter this
last week when I upgraded to 5.1, but I'm pretty sure I have a copy of 3.7
for AIX.  You can contact me if you don't find another solution.

Gene Greenberg Jr.
Lead, System Administrator, DBA, SMA
512-464-5162
Round Rock ISD
Round Rock TX



  Ray Pratts
  ray.pratts@MARKITo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  IISYS.COM   cc:
  Sent by: ADSM:  Subject:  Need TSM 3.7
  Dist Stor
  Manager
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  .EDU


  07/10/02 03:27 PM
  Please respond to
  ADSM: Dist Stor
  Manager






Can I obtain TSM  3.7 Server for AIX.  I have a system that I was about to
upgrade to TSM 5.1.  Well crashed and I need to restore the TSM database
with 3.7 before I can upgrade.  Any ideas.  Thanks.


Ray Pratts
Senior Systems Engineer
Mark III Systems, Inc
6575 West Loop South, Suite 675
Bellaire, TX 77401
713-664-9850 ext. 29



solaris experts plz help

2002-07-10 Thread Gerald Wichmann

Below is the output of my server's probe-scsi-all.. I have 2 ATL M1500 LTO
libraries with 2 drives each, and one HP 1200ex optical library with 10
optical drives. I need to populate the mt.conf, lb.conf, and op.conf
files accordingly but what I've done doesn't seem to be working. When doing
the add_drv command, it loads the device driver but then fails to attach.
When I do add_drv for op it works but I only get a 0op and 1op so I'm
not sure why it didn't pick up 10 drives.

So my first question is, what do I put in the various conf files? I'm not as
familiar with solaris so could use some help. Currently my files look like
this:

Lb.conf

  Name=lb class=scsi
Target=5 lun=0;
  Name=lb class=scsi
Target=4 lun=0;
  Name=lb class=scsi
Target=4 lun=1;

Op.conf

  Name=lb class=scsi
Target=4 lun=0;
  Name=lb class=scsi
Target=4 lun=1;

Mt.conf

  Name=lb class=scsi
Target=5 lun=0;
  Name=lb class=scsi
Target=4 lun=0;

Probe-scsi-all:

/pci@1f,2000/pci@1/scsi@5
Target 0
  Unit 0   Removable Medium changerM4 DATA MagFile 2.10
Target 1
  Unit 0   Removable Tape HP  Ultrium 1-SCSI  E15V
Target 2
  Unit 0   Removable Tape HP  Ultrium 1-SCSI  E15V

/pci@1f,2000/pci@1/scsi@4
Target 0
  Unit 0   Removable Medium changerM4 DATA MagFile 2.10
Target 1
  Unit 0   Removable Tape HP  Ultrium 1-SCSI  E15V
Target 2
  Unit 0   Removable Tape HP  Ultrium 1-SCSI  E15V

/pci@1f,4000/scsi@4,1
Target 2
  Unit 0   Removable Device type 7 HP  C1113J  1.10
Target 3
  Unit 0   Removable Device type 7 HP  C1113J  1.10
Target 4
  Unit 0   Removable Device type 7 HP  C1113J  1.10
Target 5
  Unit 0   Removable Device type 7 HP  C1113J  1.10
Target 6
  Unit 0   Removable Device type 8 HP  C1107J  1.40

/pci@1f,4000/scsi@4
Target 1
  Unit 0   Removable Device type 7 HP  C1113J  1.10
Target 2
  Unit 0   Removable Device type 7 HP  C1113J  1.10
Target 3
  Unit 0   Removable Device type 7 HP  C1113J  1.10
Target 4
  Unit 0   Removable Device type 7 HP  C1113J  1.10
Target 5
  Unit 0   Removable Device type 7 HP  C1113J  1.10
Target 6
  Unit 0   Removable Device type 7 HP  C1113J  1.10



Gerald Wichmann
Senior Systems Development Engineer
Zantaz, Inc.
925.598.3099 (w)



Re: TSM storage problem

2002-07-10 Thread Gerald Wichmann

I would imagine it should be fine installing it afterwards.. It should just
dump various *.lic files into the TSM server directory. The license files
are only available off the base cd.. i.e. 5.1.0, or 4.2.0, or whichever
version you have. If you download an update like 5.1.1, it doesn't include
the license files. That's why when you do a fresh install you always start
with the base level off the cd, then upgrade it with the update. So you get
the license files installed.

I'd first check if there are *.lic files in the directory and try licensing
it with the command below. If that doesn't work it probably wasn't
installed. If that doesn't work then next I would halt the TSM server (type
halt at TSM admin prompt or if you're using windows, stop the TSM server
service), install the license files, and then start the TSM server again (in
windows, the TSM server service). Then try registering it as below.

IF you're uncomfortable doing it you could always call Tivoli support and
have them walk you through it but it's pretty painless. Doubt you'd hurt
anything as TSM is pretty resilient.

Gerald Wichmann
Senior Systems Development Engineer
Zantaz, Inc.
925.598.3099 (w)

-Original Message-
From: Simeon Johnston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 2:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM storage problem

That's what I had thought also.  The people who set it up (set it up for
us while training us etc) said it didn't matter either.
If the licensing package was not installed can it be installed
afterwards?  There is an option to install the licensing package
(something like that.  It's not too clear on exactly what it's for) but
I don't want to screw up what I already have setup.

Even the sales rep that sold it to us said the licensing wasn't necessary.
Funky...

sim

Gerald Wichmann wrote:

To my knowledge, licensing doesn't matter. I have had many servers in the
past run for quite some time before I bothered licensing them and a server
here that continues to run without registering the licenses. It gripes
about
being uncompliant in the activity log however no functionality has been
disabled. It will be interesting if indeed that's the problem as either I
was wrong or Tivoli changed it and made licensing matter. The thing with
licensing is all the license files are on the base cd so it doesn't really
know whether you paid for them or not. It would be easy for you to check if
this is your problem assuming you installed the license package/lpp's
simply
by doing a reg lic file=mgsyslan.lic number=1  or however many you want
to
license for the number parameter. Then do a q lic to see if it's
compliant.

But it does indeed look like that's your problem based on the definition of
that ANR.. looks like you found your problem.





Re: client schedules

2002-07-10 Thread Remeta, Mark

only schedule one backup and use the resourceutilization dsm.opt file
option. It allows the backup client to multi thread the backup if resources
are available. I don't think you can get it to run two scheduled actions at
once unless you setup two unique schedulers on the client with two unique
node names...



-Original Message-
From: Max Kwong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 5:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: client schedules


Hi all,

Can i create two client schedule at the same dtart time on one client node.
Becase i want to backup two different drive at the same time. I've tried to
create the schedules but one always missing the job. How can l solve it.

Regards,
Max Kwong

Confidentiality Note: The information transmitted is intended only for the
person or entity to whom or which it is addressed and may contain
confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission,
dissemination or other use of this information by persons or entities other
than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you receive this in error,
please delete this material immediately.



Re: Backup a W2K Domain Controller?

2002-07-10 Thread Jim Smith

Jon,

I'm sure there are a number of pros and cons and I'll let others chime in
... one advantage of having a backup of the Active Directory on a given DC
is time to recovery. While you can bring an active directory back by
simply installing it and letting it synchronize to catch-up to the rest
of the organization, this synchronization can take quite a long time
depending on the size of the directory.  In this case, a backup product
can give you a point-in-time copy of the active directory such that the
synchronization process only has to catch-up from a time in the recent
past.  The time to restore from a tape can be much quicker then doing a
synchronization from ground-zero.

- Jim

J.P. (Jim) Smith
TSM Client Development


Here's an interesting question:  why would you want to backup a DC,
especially where you have a DC (W2K) or two in every remote site of the
WAN?
Why/what would you ever restore that you wouldn't get from the other
domain
controllers if one or even a few are down?

I ask this because my theory is when in doubt, backup it up.  At a
couple
hundred dollars a license it seems a reasonable assurance policy
(depending
on the budget, of course).  Another theory applies here as well, backup
everything, exclude only as needed, even if that client options set gets
pretty big.


Jon R. Adams
IT IPS BST Infrastructure
Premera Blue Cross
Mountlake Terrace, WA
425-670-5770
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



TSM 5.1 Performance Tuning Guide - Where?

2002-07-10 Thread Roger Deschner

The README.SRV file for AIX Server 5.1.1.1 update says that, The IBM
Tivoli Storage Manager V5.1 Performance Tuning Guide will be available
on the home page. Point your web browser to this address:
  http://www.tivoli.com/support/storage_mgr/tivolimain.html 

I can't find it.

Roger Deschner  University of Illinois at Chicago [EMAIL PROTECTED]
=== The command line is your friend. ===



q sched

2002-07-10 Thread Ruksana Siddiqui

Hi ,

IS there a single command I can use to query  the schedule and find the
schedules that are not active.

I did

q sched type=admin f=d

but I just want to see the name of the schedule and active?=yes/ no

is it possible ? I'm sure it is and I believe some SQL statement can do it -
wondering if anyone is having handy statement...?

with regards,

CAUTION - This message may contain privileged and confidential information intended 
only for the use of the addressee named above. If you are not the intended recipient 
of this message you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or 
reproduction of this message is prohibited. If you have received this message in error 
please notify AMCOR immediately. Any views expressed in this message are those of the 
individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of AMCOR.