Re: Whats wrong with this EXCLUDE

[Mark D. Rodriguez]

Mark Stapleton wrote:


I have the following statement in my CLOPTSET:

EXCLUDE *:\...\documents and settings\...\usrclass.dat

10/17/2002 20:42:49 ANE4987E (Session: 1853, Node: UCC-PC84) Error
processing '\\ucc-pc84\c$\Documents and



Settings\kperdue.ADM.VCU.EDU\Local



Settings\Application Data\Microsoft\Windows\UsrClass.dat': the object is
in use by another process




Not really enough information here to give you a definitive answer.




Sure there is.

Instead of

   EXCLUDE *:\...\documents and settings\...\usrclass.dat

try

   EXCLUDE *:\...\usrclass.dat

I bet it's that nasty space-in-the-directory-name business.

--
Mark Stapleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Certified TSM consultant
Certified AIX system engineer
MCSE



Mark,

The two excludes are not equivalent!  Yours would exclude any file named
"usrclass.dat" regardless of drive or directory, where as the original
only wishes to exclude "usrclass.dat" if there is a "documents and
settings" subdirectory in the path to the file.  It may be suffucent for
his needs but its different.

The space in the directory name could be the problem if it is not
quoted.  However, I still maintain without seeing the full
include/exclude list there is not enough info.  Suppose there is an
"include *.dat" line that gets processed first, then the exclude is
irrelevent.


--
Regards,
Mark D. Rodriguez
President MDR Consulting, Inc.

===
MDR Consulting
The very best in Technical Training and Consulting.
IBM Advanced Business Partner
SAIR Linux and GNU Authorized Center for Education
IBM Certified Advanced Technical Expert, CATE
AIX Support and Performance Tuning, RS6000 SP, TSM/ADSM and Linux
Red Hat Certified Engineer, RHCE
===

Re: NEED HELP with EXPORT problem with 4.2.2.13 server

[Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU]

Still no joy with the EXPORT.  I am pretty much back to square-1.

Export fails with:

10/17/2002 20:57:44   ANRD AFCPUTIL(1683): ThreadId<3609> Row not
found for bitfile 0.5885060.






Andrew Raibeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
10/16/2002 03:53 PM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"


To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: NEED HELP with EXPORT problem with 4.2.2.13 server


Hi Zoltan,

Your actlog messages include message ANR0919E, which is an indicator of
the problem. Look up the message in the TSM Messages manual (or issue HELP
ANR0919E from the Admin CLI) for information about this message and what
to do about it.

Regards,

Andy

Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/IBM@IBMUS
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (change eye to i to reply)

The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The command line is your friend.
"Good enough" is the enemy of excellence.




Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
10/16/2002 10:45
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"


To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:NEED HELP with EXPORT problem with 4.2.2.13 server



Based on a variety of comments here, I just jumped from TSM OS390 V4.1.4
to TSM z/OS V4.2.2.13.

If you recall, I had an EXPORT issue (for which I received absolutely *NO*
reponses).

Well, things seem to have gone from bad to work with this new version.
Here are my logs:

10/16/2002 13:34:35   ANR2017I Administrator ZFORRAY issued command:
EXPORT NODE ATLAS.VCU.EDU FILEDATA=ALL PREVIEW=NO DEVCLASS=CART3590
SCRATCH=YES
10/16/2002 13:34:35   ANR0984I Process 5 for EXPORT NODE started in the
BACKGROUND at 13:34:35.
10/16/2002 13:34:35   ANR0609I EXPORT NODE started as process 5.
10/16/2002 13:34:35   ANR0609I EXPORT NODE started as process 5.
10/16/2002 13:34:35   ANR0402I Session 155 started for administrator
ZFORRAY(Server) (Memory IPC).
10/16/2002 13:35:37   ANR5324I Assigning volume 040500 to EXPORT.
10/16/2002 13:35:37   ANR1360I Output volume 040500 opened (sequence
number 1).
10/16/2002 13:35:37   ANR0610I EXPORT NODE started by ZFORRAY as process
5.
10/16/2002 13:35:38   ANR0635I EXPORT NODE: Processing node ATLAS.VCU.EDU
in domain UCSAC.
10/16/2002 13:35:38   ANR0637I EXPORT NODE: Processing file space /home
for node ATLAS.VCU.EDU fsId 1 .
10/16/2002 13:35:38   ANR0637I EXPORT NODE: Processing file space /home1
for node ATLAS.VCU.EDU fsId 2 .
10/16/2002 13:35:38   ANR0637I EXPORT NODE: Processing file space /home2
for node ATLAS.VCU.EDU fsId 3 .
10/16/2002 13:35:38   ANR0637I EXPORT NODE: Processing file space /home3
for node ATLAS.VCU.EDU fsId 4 .
10/16/2002 13:35:38   ANR0637I EXPORT NODE: Processing file space /home4
for node ATLAS.VCU.EDU fsId 5 .
10/16/2002 13:35:38   ANR0637I EXPORT NODE: Processing file space /home5
for node ATLAS.VCU.EDU fsId 6 .
10/16/2002 13:35:38   ANR0637I EXPORT NODE: Processing file space /home6
for node ATLAS.VCU.EDU fsId 7 .
10/16/2002 13:35:38   ANR0637I EXPORT NODE: Processing file space /home7
for node ATLAS.VCU.EDU fsId 8 .
10/16/2002 13:35:38   ANR0637I EXPORT NODE: Processing file space / for
node ATLAS.VCU.EDU fsId 9 .
10/16/2002 13:35:38   ANR0637I EXPORT NODE: Processing file space /src for
node ATLAS.VCU.EDU fsId 12 .
10/16/2002 13:35:38   ANR0637I EXPORT NODE: Processing file space /usr/ac
for node ATLAS.VCU.EDU fsId 13 .
10/16/2002 13:35:38   ANR0637I EXPORT NODE: Processing file space
/usr/local for node ATLAS.VCU.EDU fsId 14 .
10/16/2002 13:35:38   ANR0637I EXPORT NODE: Processing file space
/var/spool for node ATLAS.VCU.EDU fsId 16 .
10/16/2002 13:35:38   ANR0919E Filespace name  with length 0 was
encountered for nodes HYDRA1.VCU.EDU,ARRAKIS.VCU.EDU,XENA.VCU.EDU,CALLI-

STO.VCU.EDU,JUPITER.VCU.EDU,VISHNU.PHY.VCU.EDU,ATHENA.VCU.EDU,MINERVA.VCU.EDU,NEPTUNE.VCU.EDU.

10/16/2002 13:35:38   ANRD SMXI(1044): ThreadId<485> Error 1 setting
object  names.
10/16/2002 13:35:39   ANR1361I Output volume 040500 closed.
10/16/2002 13:35:39   ANR5208I Dismounting volume 040500 (updated).
10/16/2002 13:35:39   ANR5228I Deleting 3590 040500 from volume history
(EXPORT volume).
10/16/2002 13:35:39   ANR0728E EXPORT NODE: Processing terminated
abnormally internal error.
10/16/2002 13:35:39   ANR0626I EXPORT NODE: Copied 1 node definitions.
10/16/2002 13:35:39   ANR0568W Session 155 for admin ZFORRAY (Server)
terminatedv- connection with client severed.
10/16/2002 13:35:39   ANR0627I EXPORT NODE: Copied 13 file space 0 archive
files, fsId439516744, 0 backup files, and 0 space managed files.
10/16/2002 13:35:39   ANR0629I EXPORT NODE: Copied 1047 bytes of data.
10/16/2002 13:35:39   ANR0611I EXPORT NODE started by ZFORRAY as process 5
has ended.
10/16/2002 13:35:39   ANR0986I Process 5 for EXPORT NODE running in the
BACKGROUND processed 14 items for

Re: default directory for the macro command

[William F. Colwell]

Joel, I made a .bat file to start dsmadmc in the mac directory,
then I made a shortcut to execute the .bat file.  Here is the file -

cd macs
set dsm_dir=c:\program files\tivoli\tsm\baclient
set dsm_config=c:\program files\tivoli\tsm\baclient\dsm.opt
"c:\program files\tivoli\tsm\baclient\dsmadmc.exe"


The shortcut has the 'start in' field set to "C:\tsmadmin".  Therfore the
macros are in c:\tsmadmin\macs.

Hope this helps,

Bill
At 05:46 PM 10/17/2002, you wrote:
>Is there a way to set the default directory for the macro command to
>something other than the installation directory?

--
Bill Colwell
C. S. Draper Lab
Cambridge Ma.

Re: help - labeling volumes for scratch...

[David Longo]

I have a 3575-L32.  What color are the "tabs" on  the new tapes.
Red, Blue or Green?  Are they the same as existing tapes?
If not you may have a higher capacity tape than drive can use.

That's my quick answer.  If that's not it then I would suggest
reboot server with TSM and 3575 library and try again.



David B. Longo
System Administrator
Health First, Inc.
3300 Fiske Blvd.
Rockledge, FL 32955-4305
PH  321.434.5536
Pager  321.634.8230
Fax:321.434.5509
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/18/02 08:14AM >>>
model - 3575lib

LABEL LIBV 3575LIB LABELS=B CHECKIN=SCR SEARCH=BULK OVERWRITE=YES

This library has been in use for 5 years...maybe longer.
I've never had a problem scratching new volumes before but it just does
not
like these tapes.

I'm painfully aware that 3.7 is NOT the NEW TSM.  We've had difficulty
with
IBM and we're working on resolving that issue.  The new TSM is on it's
way,
but right now, I have no choice but to fight with the old.

Life's not fair.

I hope this information I've provided is sufficient.  Thank you for
responding.


-Original Message-
From: ADSM Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@;VM.MARIST.EDU]On Behalf Of
David Longo
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 8:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: help - labeling volumes for scratch...


You didn't mention what Make/model of library you have.
Is it 3570 or 3575?  All new tapes need to be labeled.
What  was the full LABEL LIBVOL command you used?

Has this library been in use for a while and just adding
new tapes or is this a new install?  (I know with TSM 3.7.2.0
it isn't new TSM!)

David Longo

>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/17/02 08:32PM >>>
AIX 4.3.3.0
TSM 3.7.2.0

Hello all,
I'm trying to label newly purchased volumes as scratch to enter into
the
library.
I've tried the LABEL LIBV command with no luck.
Thinking that the volumes were already pre-labeled by the
manufacturer,
I
did a regular CHECKIN LIBV command and still no luck.
The tapes are NEW and I'm in a fix b/c I need scratch tapes within my
library.
Any suggestions will be greatly appreciated.

I verified that each tape IS NOT write protected but the following
errors
occur...

10/17/02 19:36:01 ANR8355E I/O error reading label for volume
11F4B2 in
drive RMT (/dev/rmt1).

10/17/02 19:36:29 ANR8355E I/O error reading label for volume
11F4C6 in

   drive RMT1 (/dev/rmt1).

10/17/02 19:36:53 ANR8355E I/O error reading label for volume
11F536 in

   drive RMT1 (/dev/rmt1).

10/17/02 19:37:16 ANR8355E I/O error reading label for volume
11F54A in

   drive RMT1 (/dev/rmt1).

10/17/02 19:37:40 ANR8355E I/O error reading label for volume
11F5BE in

   drive RMT1 (/dev/rmt1).

10/17/02 19:35:29 ANR8778W Scratch volume 11E1B8 changed to
Private
Status
   to prevent re-access.

10/17/02 19:36:16 ANR8778W Scratch volume 11F4B2 changed to
Private
Status
   to prevent re-access.

10/17/02 19:36:39 ANR8778W Scratch volume 11F4C6 changed to
Private
Status
   to prevent re-access.

10/17/02 19:37:03 ANR8778W Scratch volume 11F536 changed to
Private
Status
   to prevent re-access.

10/17/02 19:37:26 ANR8778W Scratch volume 11F54A changed to
Private
Status
   to prevent re-access.

10/17/02 19:37:50 ANR8778W Scratch volume 11F5BE changed to
Private
Status
   to prevent re-access.


Swonda M. Dixon
Systems Operator/AIX & TSM Admin./Jr. RPG Programmer
Chester Telephone Company
803.581.9172 (Voice) * 803.385.2191 (Main)


"MMS " made the following
 annotations on 10/17/2002 08:48:46 PM

--
This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain
confidential, proprietary, or legally privileged information.  No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
If
you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and
all
copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it, and
notify the
sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose,
distribute,
print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
recipient.  Health First reserves the right to monitor all e-mail
communications through its networks.  Any views or opinions expressed
in
this message are solely those of the individual sender, except (1)
where the
message states such views or opinions are on behalf of a particular
entity;
and (2) the sender is authorized by the entity to give such views or
opinions.


==


"MMS " made the following
 annotations on 10/18/2002 10:40:27 AM
--
This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain confidential, 

test

[Edgardo Moso]

testing

TDP for Oracle manual for 2.1

[Large, Matthew]

All,

We have TDP for Oracle 2.1.0.10 for our machines, and, with no chance to
upgrade, I need to figure out how the old options are laid out.
Does anyone know where I can find the manual for it? (2.1)
I've looked here:
http://www.tivoli.com/support/public/Prodman/public_manuals/td/TD_PROD_LIST.
html
and here:
http://www.tivoli.com/support/public/Prodman/public_manuals/td/TD_MKT_LIST.h
tml#Storage
but i can't find it!!
A link would be useful..

Cheers,
Matthew

Matthew Large
TSM Infrastructure Engineer
Lavington Street
Int: 7430 4995
Ext: +44 207 902 4995



---
This e-mail is intended only for the above addressee.  It may contain
privileged information. If you are not the addressee you must not copy,
distribute, disclose or use any of the information in it.  If you have
received it in error please delete it and immediately notify the sender.

evolvebank.com is a division of Lloyds TSB Bank plc.
Lloyds TSB Bank plc, 71 Lombard Street, London EC3P 3BS.  Registered in
England, number 2065.  Telephone No: 020 7626 1500
Lloyds TSB Scotland plc, Henry Duncan House, 120 George Street,
Edinburgh EH2 4LH.  Registered in Scotland, number 95237.  Telephone
No: 0131 225 4555

Lloyds TSB Bank plc and Lloyds TSB Scotland plc are regulated by the
Financial Services Authority and represent only the Scottish Widows
and Lloyds TSB Marketing Group for life assurance, pensions and
investment business.

Signatories to the Banking Codes.
---

ANR9999D afmigr.c (3007)

[Jose Antonio Atala Olaechea]

Hi ADSM'ers

While running space reclamation I receive this messages:

ANR1044I Removable volume SCH015 is required for space reclamation.
ANR0985I Process 38 for space reclamation running in the background complete
with completion state FAILURE at 12:47:38
ANRD afmigr.c (3007): ThreadId<35> Space reclamation terminated for
volume SCH015 - unexpected result code (3).
ANR1092W Space reclamation terminated for volume SCH015 - internal server
error detected.

What can i do??

Jose





_
MSN. Mas Ztil Cada Dma http://www.msn.es/intmap/

Re: How to access TDP for Exchange GUI from remote PC

[Del Hoobler]

> We have installed TDP for Exchange in one of our Exchange servers and the
> Administrator wants to be able to access the GUI for TDP from his PC to
be
> able to do backups/restores remotely.
> We normally use for the NT side of it the TSM Web Client and we are
looking
> for something similar to that for TDP.

Beatriz,

There is no remote client available for TDP for Exchange.
You can use any of the "Remote Access" tools that
allow you to access a GUI console on a remote machine
and run it that way.

Thanks,

Del



Del Hoobler
IBM Corporation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

- Never cut what can be untied.
- Commit yourself to constant improvement.

Re: Veritas Enterprise Netbackup 4.5

[Mr. Lindsay Morris]

1.  Not 100% sure, but Veritas "dominates the market" because they give it
away, right?
I mean, don't they bundle it with Solaris or some other OS, so when they
count their installed base, they count all the Sun boxes whether people are
using it on those boxes or not?

Hope I'm not just disseminating rumor...

2. No other backup product is as robust and well-designed as TSM.  But the
features and efficient use of resources make it complex, so some people may
prefer simplicity and the fun point-and-click interface that come with
Veritas.

3. On a day-one comparison, Veritas does perform better than TSM, because
they BOTH have to do a full backup on day one.  But after a week or a month
has passed, TSM's efficiencies come to light.

TSM resellers have access to a lot of competitive whitepapers - ask your TSM
reseller to dig into the Tivoli site for you.

-
Mr. Lindsay Morris
Lead Architect, Servergraph
www.servergraph.com 
859-253-8000 ofc
425-988-8478 fax


> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@;VM.MARIST.EDU]On Behalf Of
> Kelvin Tan
> Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 1:29 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Veritas Enterprise Netbackup 4.5
>
>
> Hi Gurus
>
> At the moment we are using TSM 4.2 but the management is looking
> at Veritas Enterprise Netbackup and I have to convince them about
> staying put with TSM.  Has anybody move from TSM to Veritas
> Enterprise Netbackup 4.5 running on Unix??   Any advantages
> Veritas has over TSM?  If TSM is that good how come it does not
> dominate the backup market?  I have read the report of Veritas vs
> TSM but that is on Intel and related to version 3.
>
> Hope somebody can enlightened me.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Kelvin Tan
>
>
> "This message and any attachment to it is intended for the use of
> the individual or entity to whom it is addressed by the first
> sender and contains information which may be confidential and/or
> privileged.
>
> If you receive this message and any attachment in error, please
> delete it immediately and notify the sender by electronic mail or
> telephone (61 2) 9211 0188. Unless you have been expressly
> authorised by the sender, you are prohibited from copying,
> distributing or using the information contained in this message
> and any attachment.
>
> Tab Limited (ABN 17 081 765 308) is not responsible for any
> changes made to this message or any attachment other than those
> made by Tab Limited, or for the effect of changes made by others
> on the meaning of this message and any attachment.
>
> Tab Limited does not represent that any attachment is free from
> computer viruses or defects and the user assumes all
> responsibility for any loss, damage or consequence resulting
> directly or indirectly from the use of any attachment."
>

How to access TDP for Exchange GUI from remote PC

[Villegas, Beatrice]

Hello,

We have installed TDP for Exchange in one of our Exchange servers and the
Administrator wants to be able to access the GUI for TDP from his PC to be
able to do backups/restores remotely.

We normally use for the NT side of it the TSM Web Client and we are looking
for something similar to that for TDP.

Any help/hints will be appreciated.

Thanks in advance,

Beatriz

Re: help - labeling volumes for scratch...

[Dixon, Swonda]

model - 3575lib

LABEL LIBV 3575LIB LABELS=B CHECKIN=SCR SEARCH=BULK OVERWRITE=YES

This library has been in use for 5 years...maybe longer.
I've never had a problem scratching new volumes before but it just does not
like these tapes.

I'm painfully aware that 3.7 is NOT the NEW TSM.  We've had difficulty with
IBM and we're working on resolving that issue.  The new TSM is on it's way,
but right now, I have no choice but to fight with the old.

Life's not fair.

I hope this information I've provided is sufficient.  Thank you for
responding.


-Original Message-
From: ADSM Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@;VM.MARIST.EDU]On Behalf Of
David Longo
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 8:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: help - labeling volumes for scratch...


You didn't mention what Make/model of library you have.
Is it 3570 or 3575?  All new tapes need to be labeled.
What  was the full LABEL LIBVOL command you used?

Has this library been in use for a while and just adding
new tapes or is this a new install?  (I know with TSM 3.7.2.0
it isn't new TSM!)

David Longo

>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/17/02 08:32PM >>>
AIX 4.3.3.0
TSM 3.7.2.0

Hello all,
I'm trying to label newly purchased volumes as scratch to enter into
the
library.
I've tried the LABEL LIBV command with no luck.
Thinking that the volumes were already pre-labeled by the manufacturer,
I
did a regular CHECKIN LIBV command and still no luck.
The tapes are NEW and I'm in a fix b/c I need scratch tapes within my
library.
Any suggestions will be greatly appreciated.

I verified that each tape IS NOT write protected but the following
errors
occur...

10/17/02 19:36:01 ANR8355E I/O error reading label for volume
11F4B2 in
drive RMT (/dev/rmt1).

10/17/02 19:36:29 ANR8355E I/O error reading label for volume
11F4C6 in

   drive RMT1 (/dev/rmt1).

10/17/02 19:36:53 ANR8355E I/O error reading label for volume
11F536 in

   drive RMT1 (/dev/rmt1).

10/17/02 19:37:16 ANR8355E I/O error reading label for volume
11F54A in

   drive RMT1 (/dev/rmt1).

10/17/02 19:37:40 ANR8355E I/O error reading label for volume
11F5BE in

   drive RMT1 (/dev/rmt1).

10/17/02 19:35:29 ANR8778W Scratch volume 11E1B8 changed to
Private
Status
   to prevent re-access.

10/17/02 19:36:16 ANR8778W Scratch volume 11F4B2 changed to
Private
Status
   to prevent re-access.

10/17/02 19:36:39 ANR8778W Scratch volume 11F4C6 changed to
Private
Status
   to prevent re-access.

10/17/02 19:37:03 ANR8778W Scratch volume 11F536 changed to
Private
Status
   to prevent re-access.

10/17/02 19:37:26 ANR8778W Scratch volume 11F54A changed to
Private
Status
   to prevent re-access.

10/17/02 19:37:50 ANR8778W Scratch volume 11F5BE changed to
Private
Status
   to prevent re-access.


Swonda M. Dixon
Systems Operator/AIX & TSM Admin./Jr. RPG Programmer
Chester Telephone Company
803.581.9172 (Voice) * 803.385.2191 (Main)


"MMS " made the following
 annotations on 10/17/2002 08:48:46 PM

--
This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain
confidential, proprietary, or legally privileged information.  No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.  If
you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all
copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it, and notify the
sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute,
print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
recipient.  Health First reserves the right to monitor all e-mail
communications through its networks.  Any views or opinions expressed in
this message are solely those of the individual sender, except (1) where the
message states such views or opinions are on behalf of a particular entity;
and (2) the sender is authorized by the entity to give such views or
opinions.


==

Re: Question about backup scenario (long)

[Zlatko Krastev/ACIT]

Yes, in prompted mode you have one more port to worry about. Polling mode
uses the port for data transfers while prompting uses separate port. The
reason is the need to drive in prompting mode the client on the TSM server
itself. Thus server is on 1500 (default) and prompted client is on 1501.

Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant






Peter Bjoern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
18.10.2002 11:45
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"


To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: Question about backup scenario (long)


Mark Stapleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :

>If you run your client schedules in prompted mode (rather than the
default
>polling mode), the server initiates the backup, not the client.


Hi Mark

But as far as I understand it, once the scheduler in prompted mode
is initiated by the server to do the backup, the baclient will still
initiate a connection from the outside to the server on port 1500 or
whatever port is configured.

Regards

Peter

Re: New Download Site??

[Zlatko Krastev/ACIT]

If you look at service, service2, service5, serviceb (index.storsys is
alias) they weren't deleted anything. You can find some rather old but
working pieces there.

Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant






Alex Paschal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
17.10.2002 23:37
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"


To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: New Download Site??


You can also go to

ftp://index.storsys.ibm.com

Even if the service.boulder server does go away, I think this one will
probably stick around, not being a service server and all.  Maybe they're
the same DFS/AFS filesystems on the back end, shared to both servers?
Maybe
index.storsys and service.boulder are the same server? They have
sequential
IPs.  It's a dead giveaway.

Or *GASP* maybe service.boulder and index.storsys shot JFK?  Nah, that's
fairly improbable.  I subscribe to the magic bullet theory myself.

Alex Paschal
Storage Administrator
Freightliner, LLC
(503) 745-6850 phone/vmail

-Original Message-
From: Zlatko Krastev/ACIT [mailto:acit@;ATTGLOBAL.NET]
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 4:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: New Download Site??


Don't even think about this !!! And do not say it in public or IBM may
really do it :-((

Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant






Sam Sheppard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
17.10.2002 00:10
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"


To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: New Download Site??


 Top of message 
>>--> 10-16-02  14:09  S.SHEPPARD (SHS)Re: New Download Site??

Good idea.  That works for now, but, given the new userid/password
requirement on the Tivoli site, I wonder how much longer the Boulder
site will work?

Sam Sheppard
San Diego Data Processing Corp.
---`

Re: Version Upgrade Question

[Hooft, Jeroen]

We did this twice last month.

- Upgraded original server to 5.1
- Installed new server with TSM 5.1
- Created identical disk layout on new server
- Stopped TSM on original server
- Copied all disk/file pools, DB, and log volumes to the new server
- Started TSM on new server.

ps. to prevent problems with device-numbering, you can delete the
drives/library on the old server, before you copy all the data.

Jeroen


-Original Message-
From: Mitch Sako [mailto:msako@;CADENCE.COM]
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 6:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Version Upgrade Question


Platform:  Win2K
Notes:  4mm DAT, no library, 15GB catalog, two clients, all UNIX backups-no
special databases, no archives

What:  Upgrade from 4.2 to 5.2 on a different machine with same disk and
tape
configuration.

Is there a "tapeless" way to do this?  The new hardware is ready and in
place,
the software will be installed.  All tape and disk devices and volumes are
the
same.  I just want to move everything to the new 5.2 server.

Would it be easier to clone the 4.2 system and do an upgrade in place?  If
so,
what would be the process for cloning a system?

Mitch Sako

Re: Version Upgrade Question

[Zlatko Krastev/ACIT]

- I assume you make a typo and are talking about ITSM 5.1
- you need to perform both upgrade and box replacement. Depending on order
you have two choices
--  move to new box + upgrade --> backup DB on old server, install
current version (4.2.x.y) on new box, restore DB there, upgrade to 5.1
--  upgrade + move to new box --> upgrade to 5.1 the current server,
backup DB on it, install same version (5.1) on new box, restore DB there,
apply maintenance (and patches if necessary)
- the "tapeless" method is very easy - define new device class of type
FILE on existing server, perform DB backup to that devclass, transfer the
resulting files to new box with your favorite method (ftp, LanMan sharing,
etc.), restore from that same devclass. No tapes involved, quick and easy.

Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant






Mitch Sako <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
17.10.2002 19:33
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"


To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Version Upgrade Question


Platform:  Win2K
Notes:  4mm DAT, no library, 15GB catalog, two clients, all UNIX
backups-no
special databases, no archives

What:  Upgrade from 4.2 to 5.2 on a different machine with same disk and
tape
configuration.

Is there a "tapeless" way to do this?  The new hardware is ready and in
place,
the software will be installed.  All tape and disk devices and volumes are
the
same.  I just want to move everything to the new 5.2 server.

Would it be easier to clone the 4.2 system and do an upgrade in place?  If
so,
what would be the process for cloning a system?

Mitch Sako

Re: Veritas Enterprise Netbackup 4.5

[Prashant R Gadikar]

Hi !!
Well this matter has been discussed on numerous occasions on this mailing
list. My first suggestion would be to quickly move on to the TSM 5.1 Ver.
it has a lots of new features incorporated. The following points may be
useful for you to probability convince your management to stay with TSM.
TSM is off-course a market leader in its playing field and 90% of the
fortune 500 companies use TSM to manage their business critical data.
Veritas may be a market leader but their presence is mainly in the
Workgroup environments.

Please consider the following points.

1.Catalog information in TSM is stored in the RDBMS, hence there is no
limit for the number of clients you backup using a single TSM server,
imagine backing up  Millions  files and saving the information on a text
based file..!! restore will take ages...!!
2. Hierarchal Storage Management, Managing the available disk space
efficiently by moving the unused files for the disk to the Magnetic Media
(Cheaper) Storage cost/MB is reduced.
3.Migration of data without depending on the type of media class used, TSM
can migrate data shamelessly between different class of medias.
4.Progressive Incremental backup, no periodic full backups.
5. TSM uses database and recoverylog, which can be mirrored for high
availability which can be used to alternate volume switching.
6.TSM each transaction undergoes a two phase commit, thus ensuring the
perfect backup.
7. Varitas multiplexing is good for backup but what about the restore,
restore time is considerably increased due to the splitting of the data.
8. TSM has the checkpoint for restartable restores, you can restart the
failed restores form the point of failure.
9. Check on the versioning capabilities of Veritas, TSM provided a very
useful versioning tool to control the number of versions for a particular
file.
10.TSM is a Single product, thus there are no hassles of integrating
different modules.
11.TSM is a Desktop to Datacentre scalable product.
12.TSM has number of Client Server communication protocols compared to the
limited number of Veritas.
13. Tape expiry is at save set level, that means you cannot treat different
files differently.
14. Additional modules for Mobile backup, TSM the modules is built-in.

Want more please feel free to contact.

Best Regards
Prashant Gadikar





  Kelvin Tan
cc:
  Sent by: "ADSM:  Subject:  Veritas Enterprise Netbackup 
4.5
  Dist Stor
  Manager"
  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  .EDU>


  10/18/2002 10:59
  AM
  Please respond to
  "ADSM: Dist Stor
  Manager"





Hi Gurus

At the moment we are using TSM 4.2 but the management is looking at Veritas
Enterprise Netbackup and I have to convince them about staying put with
TSM.  Has anybody move from TSM to Veritas Enterprise Netbackup 4.5 running
on Unix??   Any advantages Veritas has over TSM?  If TSM is that good how
come it does not dominate the backup market?  I have read the report of
Veritas vs TSM but that is on Intel and related to version 3.

Hope somebody can enlightened me.

Thanks.

Kelvin Tan


"This message and any attachment to it is intended for the use of the
individual or entity to whom it is addressed by the first sender and
contains information which may be confidential and/or privileged.

If you receive this message and any attachment in error, please delete it
immediately and notify the sender by electronic mail or telephone (61 2)
9211 0188. Unless you have been expressly authorised by the sender, you are
prohibited from copying, distributing or using the information contained in
this message and any attachment.

Tab Limited (ABN 17 081 765 308) is not responsible for any changes made to
this message or any attachment other than those made by Tab Limited, or for
the effect of changes made by others on the meaning of this message and any
attachment.

Tab Limited does not represent that any attachment is free from computer
viruses or defects and the user assumes all responsibility for any loss,
damage or consequence resulting directly or indirectly from the use of any
attachment."

backup error: Not file owner

[Michelle Wiedeman]

HI,

solaris 8
tsm client 4.x

When i run a manual backup of certain directories on the client it failes.
the message is: ANS1136E Not file owner

directory is owned by a user drwxrwxr-x

files are owned by root group other rw-r-r

I dont get itit should work.
anyone have a clue???

Michelle

problem with html/sql interface AIX TSM server 4.2.3.0

[Peter Pijpelink - P.L.C.S. BV Storage Consultants]

hello,

I get when I click on either a filespace or a volume the following message:
Is this a know bug??

I did run the ./dsmserv runfile ../webimages/dsmserv.idl


10/18/02 11:56:15 ANR2017I Administrator ADMIN issued command: QUERY
PROCESS

10/18/02 11:56:15 ANR0944E QUERY PROCESS: No active processes
found.
10/18/02 11:56:33 ANRD idutil.c(540): ThreadId<19> Cannot Prepare
SQL:
   SELECT
NODE_NAME,FILESPACE_NAME,FILESPACE_ID,FILESPACE_T-
   YPE,CAPACITY,PCT_UTIL,BACKUP_START,BACKUP_END,DELETE_OCC-
   URRED,UNICODE_FILESPACE,FILESPACE_HEXNAME FROM
FILESPACES
   WHERE
FILESPACE_NAME=X'2532353246746d70253235324332' AND
   FILESPACE_ID=%252Ftmp%252C2 AND
NODE_NAME='HQTSM03'.
10/18/02 11:56:33 (19) Context
report
10/18/02 11:56:33 (19) Thread SessionThread (40) is a parent thread
related
   to:
19
10/18/02 11:56:33 (40) Generating TM Context Report:
(struct=tmTxnDesc)
   (slots=256)

10/18/02 11:56:33 (40)  *** no transactions found
***
10/18/02 11:56:33 (40) Generating Database Transaction Table
Context:
10/18/02 11:56:33 (40)  *** no transactions found
***
10/18/02 11:56:33 (40) Generating SM Context
Report:
10/18/02 11:56:33 (40) Session
726:Type=Admin,   Id=ADMIN
10/18/02 11:56:33 (40)   Platform=WebBrowser, NodeId=0,
Owner=
10/18/02 11:56:33 (40)   SessType=0, Index=1,
TermReason=0
10/18/02
11:56:33 (40)   RecvWaitTime=0.000  (samples=0)
10/18/02 11:56:33 (40)   Backup  Objects ( bytes )  Inserted: 0 ( 0.0
)
10/18/02 11:56:33 (40)   Backup  Objects ( bytes )  Restored: 0 ( 0.0
)
10/18/02 11:56:33 (40)   Archive Objects ( bytes )  Inserted: 0 ( 0.0
)
10/18/02 11:56:33 (40)   Archive Objects ( bytes ) Retrieved: 0 ( 0.0
)
10/18/02 11:56:33 (40)   Last Verb ( (Unknown) ), Last Verb State (
Recv )
10/18/02 11:56:33 (40) Generating AS Vol Context
Report:
10/18/02 11:56:33 (40)  No mounted (or mount in progress)
volumes.
10/18/02 11:56:33 (40) Generating ssSession Context
Report:
10/18/02 11:56:33 (40)  No storage service sessions
active.
10/18/02 11:56:33 (40) Generating ssOpenSeg Context
Report:
10/18/02 11:56:33 (40)  No storage service segments
found.
10/18/02 11:56:33 (40) Generating BF Copy Control Context
Report:
10/18/02 11:56:33 (40)  No global copy control
blocks.
10/18/02
11:56:33
10/18/02 11:56:33 (19) Thread AcceptorThread (34) is a grandparent
thread
   related to:
40
10/18/02 11:56:33 (34) Generating TM Context Report:
(struct=tmTxnDesc)
   (slots=256)

10/18/02 11:56:33 (34)  *** no transactions found
***
10/18/02 11:56:33 (34) Generating Database Transaction Table
Context:
10/18/02 11:56:33 (34)  *** no transactions found
***
10/18/02 11:56:33 (34) Generating SM Context
Report:
10/18/02 11:56:33 (34)  *** no sessions found
***
10/18/02 11:56:33 (34) Generating AS Vol Context
Report:
10/18/02 11:56:33 (34)  No mounted (or mount in progress)
volumes.
10/18/02 11:56:33 (34) Generating ssSession Context
Report:
10/18/02 11:56:33 (34)  No storage service sessions
active.
10/18/02 11:56:33 (34) Generating ssOpenSeg Context
Report:
10/18/02 11:56:33 (34)  No storage service segments
found.
10/18/02 11:56:33 (34) Generating BF Copy Control Context
Report:
10/18/02 11:56:33 (34)  No global copy control
blocks.
10/18/02
11:56:33
10/18/02 11:56:33 (19) SmHttpCommandThread : ANRD calling
thread
10/18/02 11:56:33 (19) Generating TM Context Report:
(struct=tmTxnDesc)
   (slots=256)

10/18/02 11:56:33 (19) slot ->
81:
10/18/02 11:56:33 (19) Tsn=0:55377, Resurrected=False,
InFlight=True,
   Distributed=False

10/18/02 11:56:33 (19)  Participants=1,
summaryVote=ReadOnly
10/18/02 11:56:33 Participant DB: voteReceived=False,
ackReceived=False
10/18/02 11:56:33 (19) Generating Database Transaction Table
Context:
10/18/02 11:56:33 (19)  *** no transactions found
***
10/18/02 11:56:33 (19) Generating SM Context
Report:
10/18/02 11:56:33 (19)  *** no sessions found
***
10/18/02 11:56:33 (19) Generating AS Vol Context
Report:
10/18/02 11:56:33 (19)  No mounted (or mount in progress)
volumes.
10/18/02 11:56:33 (19) Generating ssSession Context
Report:
10/18/02 11:56:33 (19)  No storage service sessions
active.
10/18/02 11:56:33 (19) Generating ssOpenSeg Context
Report:
10/18/02 11:56:33 (19)  No storage service segments
found.
10/18/02 11:56:33 (19) Generating BF Copy Control Context
Report:
10/18/02 11:56:33 (19)  No global copy control
blocks.
10/18/02
11:56:33
10/18/02 11:56:33 (19) End Context
report
10/18/02 11:56:33 ANR2911E Invalid SQL numeric literal token -
'252Ftmp'.
10/18/02 11:56:33 ANR2032E HTML: Command failed - internal serv

Re: Veritas Enterprise Netbackup 4.5

[Carsten Moldrup]

Hi there,

Well, for one, changes in access permissions for files in unix filesystems
will not trigger an incremental backup in netbackup - as such change will
not change the files' modified-date.

Regards,
Carsten Moldrup



Kelvin Tan
   Subject: Veritas Enterprise Netbackup
Sent by: 4.5
"ADSM: Dist
Stor Manager"

Oracle 8.1.7 backup failure

[HEMPSTEAD, Tim]

People,

Anybody have any ideas on how we can fix the following.  We have Oracle
8.1.7.0 backing up to TSM 3.7.4 using TDP for Oracle 2.1.0.9 under AIX 4.3.3
ML8.

Backup fails with the error message as below after approximately 2hrs and
errpt indicates that Oracle core dumps at this time as well.

Thanks

Tim


The error obtained is as follows:
RMAN-00571: ===
RMAN-00569: === ERROR MESSAGE STACK FOLLOWS ===
RMAN-00571: ===
RMAN-03015: error occurred in stored script backup_db_level_0
RMAN-03006: non-retryable error occurred during execution of command: backup
RMAN-07004: unhandled exception during command execution on channel tape1
RMAN-10035: exception raised in RPC: ORA-00447: fatal error in background
process
RMAN-10031: ORA-19583 occurred during call to
DBMS_BACKUP_RESTORE.BACKUPPIECECREATE

--
Tim Hempstead, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unix Technical Specialist
SchlumbergerSema


_
This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the
individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions presented are
solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of
SchlumbergerSema.
If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that you have received
this email in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing,
or copying of this email is strictly prohibited.

If you have received this email in error please notify the
SchlumbergerSema Helpdesk by telephone on +44 (0) 121 627 5600.
_

Veritas Enterprise Netbackup 4.5

[Kelvin Tan]

Hi Gurus
 
At the moment we are using TSM 4.2 but the management is looking at Veritas Enterprise 
Netbackup and I have to convince them about staying put with TSM.  Has anybody move 
from TSM to Veritas Enterprise Netbackup 4.5 running on Unix??   Any advantages 
Veritas has over TSM?  If TSM is that good how come it does not dominate the backup 
market?  I have read the report of Veritas vs TSM but that is on Intel and related to 
version 3.
 
Hope somebody can enlightened me.
 
Thanks.
 
Kelvin Tan
 

"This message and any attachment to it is intended for the use of the individual or 
entity to whom it is addressed by the first sender and contains information which may 
be confidential and/or privileged.

If you receive this message and any attachment in error, please delete it immediately 
and notify the sender by electronic mail or telephone (61 2) 9211 0188. Unless you 
have been expressly authorised by the sender, you are prohibited from copying, 
distributing or using the information contained in this message and any attachment.

Tab Limited (ABN 17 081 765 308) is not responsible for any changes made to this 
message or any attachment other than those made by Tab Limited, or for the effect of 
changes made by others on the meaning of this message and any attachment.

Tab Limited does not represent that any attachment is free from computer viruses or 
defects and the user assumes all responsibility for any loss, damage or consequence 
resulting directly or indirectly from the use of any attachment."

Re: Question about backup scenario (long)

[Peter Bjoern]

Mark Stapleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :

>If you run your client schedules in prompted mode (rather than the default
>polling mode), the server initiates the backup, not the client.


Hi Mark

But as far as I understand it, once the scheduler in prompted mode
is initiated by the server to do the backup, the baclient will still
initiate a connection from the outside to the server on port 1500 or
whatever port is configured.

Regards

Peter

Re: Question about backup scenario (long)

[Peter Bjoern]

Alex Paschal wrote :

>Let me get this straight.  They're willing to do one outside initiated
IP-IP
>rule on the firewall (your server-server communication), they're just not
>willing to multiple IP-IP port limiting rules, one for each client?

>Then what about dropping a second NIC in each client and in the TSM
server,
>then create a private segment or VLAN?  It can be packet/IP filtered
pretty
>easily and cheaply if desired, and if the segment is switched, you don't
>have to worry too much about packet sniffing.  Personally, I think having
a
>DMZ TSM server is overkill.

The "outside" TSM server is not on the far outside but rather in a DMZ.
>From the far outside to the inside server is at least three levels of
firewalls.
Maybe an overkill, but those are the conditions we have to live under in
this case.

Also, we don't own all the external clients and we cannot force the owners
to buy extra hardware (however cheap it may be).

Regards

Peter

file name too long errors!

[Chetan H. Ravnikar]

Hi all,

anyone seen this error, when I am trying to backup an NFS directory on a
client I get this error. Is there a limitation within TSM w.r.t
length of file-names

I am on 4.2.20 client (solaris-2.8) talking to a 4.2.20 server (sol-2.8)
Any info is helpful

thanks
Chetan



ANS4018E Error processing
'/nacbkp/nacbuster.CARBVOL0.tsm.nightly0/drg01/trm/work/DW_rams/DW_ram_r_w_s_dff/DW_ram_r_w_s_dff/DW_ram_r_w_s_dff/DW_ram_r_w_s_dff/DW_ram_r_w_s_dff/DW_ram_r_w_s_dff/DW_ram_r_w_s_dff/DW_ram_r_w_s_dff/DW_ram_r_w_s_dff/DW_ram_r_w_s_dff/DW_ram_r_w_s_dff/DW_ram_r_w_s_dff/DW_ram_r_w_s_dff/DW_ram_r_w_s_dff/DW_ram_r_w_s_dff/DW_ram_r_w_s_dff/DW_ram_r_w_s_dff/DW_ram_r_w_s_dff/DW_ram_r_w_s_dff/DW_ram_r_w_s_dff/DW_ram_r_w_s_dff/DW_ram_r_w_s_dff/DW_ram_r_w_s_dff/DW_ram_r_w_s_dff/DW_ram_r_w_s_dff/DW_ram_r_w_s_dff/DW_ram_r_w_s_dff/DW_ram_r_w_s_dff/DW_ram_r_w_s_dff/DW_ram_r_w_s_dff/DW_ram_r_w_s_dff/DW_ram_r_w_s_dff/DW_ram_r_w_s_dff/DW_ram_r_w_s_dff/DW_ram_r_w_s_dff/DW_ram_r_w_s_dff/DW_ram_r_w_s_dff/DW_ram_r_w_s_dff/DW_ram_r_w_s_dff/DW_ram_r_w_s_dff/DW_ram_r_w_s_dff/DW_ram_r_w_s_dff/DW_ram_r_w_s_dff/DW_ram_r_w_s_dff/DW_ram_r_w_s_dff/DW_ram_r_w_s_dff/DW_ram_r_w_s_dff/DW_ram_r_w_s_dff/DW_ram_r_w_s_dff/DW_ram_r_w_s_dff/DW_ram_r_w_s_dff/DW_ram_r_w_s_dff/DW_ram_r_w_s_dff/DW_ram_r_w_s_dff/DW_ram_r_w_s_dff/DW_ram_r_w_s_dff':
file name too long
Normal File-->58
/nacbkp/nacbuster.CARBVOL0.tsm.nightly0/drg01/savage/.emacs.d/auto-save-list/.saves-20361-savage-lx~
[Sent]
f': file name too long
Normal File-->58
/nacbkp/nacbuster.CARBVOL0.tsm.nightly0/drg01/savage/.emacs.d/auto-save-list/.saves-20361-savage-lx~
[Sent]

Total number of objects inspected:  311,813
Total number of objects backed up:0
Total number of objects updated:  0
Total number of objects rebound:  0
Total number of objects deleted:  0
Total number of objects expired:  0
Total number of objects failed:   1
Total number of bytes transferred: 1.27 MB
Data transfer time:0.05 sec
Network data transfer rate:23,879.31 KB/sec
Aggregate data transfer rate:  0.44 KB/sec
Objects compressed by:0%
Elapsed processing time:   00:48:43
ANS4018E Error processing
file name too long