ANE4034E
Hello Recently I've been getting the following errors during backup: 2003\02\11 02:36:26 ANE4023E (Session: 3219, Node: SPNT305) Error processing '\\spnt305\c$': file input/output error The backup seems to run fine. The clients are Windows 2000 and the BA client is 4.2.1.20. We are running ver 4.2.0.0 on MVS. What does the error mean and is it serious? Regards Niklas Lundström Swedbank
MAGSTAR tapes
Hi TSMers, We need to send some tapes (3590E) offsite, outside the country, and there is a good possibility that the tapes will undergo X-ray checks while en-route. Can anybody advice whether we can take any precautions to safeguard against accidental damage of the tapes ? Any help would be highly appreciated. Thanks in advance. Regards, ole0.bmp Nitin Ubhayakar * 3989111 x 69182 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ole0.bmp
Re: select command
Hi Mr Chandrasekhar, You could probably use something like : Select blah ... where cast((scheduled_start-current_timestamp)hours as decimal) 24 In this case you can replace hours by minutes or even seconds or select blah ... where dayname(scheduled_start) ='Tuesday' Hope it helped ! Arnaud =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= | Arnaud Brion, Panalpina Management Ltd., IT Group | | Viaduktstrasse 42, P.O. Box, 4002 Basel - Switzerland | | Phone: +41 61 226 19 78 / Fax: +41 61 226 17 01 | =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= -Original Message- From: Chandrasekhar, C.R [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 11 February, 2003 6:03 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: select command hi TSM guys, How can I write equivalent select command for the following command. q event * * begindate=today-1 enddate=today-1 I tried many ways to achieve this some were Iam facing problem while manipulating date function. Thanks, chandrasekhar.cr System Executive, Tivoli Certified Consultant. ** This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not forward, copy, print, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. The Timken Company **
[no subject]
Hello I just want to know of its possible to run two TSM servers on the same machine. We are running AIX 4.3.3 and TSM 3.7 Regards Thando Ndaba SAPO This e-mail is sent in terms of the following policy/disclaimer. Click on this link http://www.sapo.co.za/mail_disclaimer.htm to read full disclaimer.
journal errors - return code 121 \\.\pipe\jnl
Hi All I'm getting the following from a new client that is running journaling. TSM Client is 5.1.5.2, server is 5.1.5.4. 10-02-2002 09:20:05 NpOpen : Named pipe error connecting to server WaitOnPipe failed. NpOpen: call failed with return code:121 pipe name \\.\pipe\jnl I see there was a similar thread last week ( G.Gill and C.Magura )and wondered if you guys got any further with it. We have a few clients at the above levels using journaling but only 1 seems to be giving the pipe problem. TIA Chris _ Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
Re: update default backup copy group
Joni, Changing the serialization of the backup copy group will have no impact to current backup data. Your backups may go slightly faster if you have had a lot of retries before. Be aware of two things though. 1) There may still be certain files which cannot be opened for backup. 2) Depends on the data whether dynamic is a suitable serialization. It is no good presenting the users with a backup if it is not usable on a restore, so you/they need to test. John Joni Moyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 02/10/2003 08:12:57 PM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:(bcc: John Naylor/HAV/SSE) Subject: update default backup copy group Hi Everyone! I have a request from users to change the management of their data to backup open closed files, which would be dynamic for the copy serialization parameter of the backup copy group. I want to change this parameter for the default backup copy group. I have looked in the book to see what this will change, but it doesn't really say much. If I change the copy serialization, will it do anything to current data? From my point of view, as soon as I make this change all future backups will backup all files on the server (whether the file is open or not). Is this a correct assumption? Thank you!!! Joni Moyer Systems Programmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] (717)975-8338 ** The information in this E-Mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. It may not represent the views of Scottish and Southern Energy plc. It is intended solely for the addressees. Access to this E-Mail by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any unauthorised recipient should advise the sender immediately of the error in transmission. Scottish Hydro-Electric, Southern Electric, SWALEC and S+S are trading names of the Scottish and Southern Energy Group. **
Re: ANE4034E
Niklas, Do a checkdisk on the client. Maybe there are errors on it. Maria Ilieva ---Original Message--- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager Date: 11 Ôåâðóàðè 2003 10:10:48 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ANE4034E Hello Recently I've been getting the following errors during backup: 2003\02\11 02:36:26 ANE4023E (Session: 3219, Node: SPNT305) Error processing '\\spnt305\c$': file input/output error The backup seems to run fine. The clients are Windows 2000 and the BA client is 4.2.1.20. We are running ver 4.2.0.0 on MVS. What does the error mean and is it serious? Regards Niklas Lundström Swedbank . IMSTP.gif
Re: Occupancy from copy_pool primary_pool ??
Hi I believe Paul is right, but if you want to check for data in copypool, and not in primary pool, do a restore stgpool primarypool preview=yes. It should tell you if there are data in the copypool which are not in primarypool. It also tells you which tapes you need to really perform the restore of the primary pool (if you want to do it -preview=no). Just my 2 cents... Rgds. Geirr G. Halvorsen -Original Message- From: Seay, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10. februar 2003 20:27 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Occupancy from copy_pool primary_pool ?? I think any aggregates that have deleted files in them are still counted as whole. So, if reclamation ever runs against the primary and any copy pools it is highly likely some aggregates in one pool would be reclaimed and in others they may not. The other possibility is you have more than one primary pool which has had a backup stgpool command to the copy pool. Paul D. Seay, Jr. Technical Specialist Northrop Grumman Information Technology 757-688-8180 -Original Message- From: PAC Brion Arnaud [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 12:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Occupancy from copy_pool primary_pool ?? Hi* SM'ers, Could anybody explain me how it is possible that following query : select sum (physical_mb), sum (logical_mb), stgpool_name from occupancy group by stgpool_name shows me copy-pools occupation bigger than primary pools ? I first thought it could be related to space reclamation process, but when I ran that query all reclamation processes where allready finished (same thresholds for both primary and copy pools), so I'm stuck :-( Anybody willing to shed some light on me ? Thanks in advance. Arnaud =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= | Arnaud Brion, Panalpina Management Ltd., IT Group | | Viaduktstrasse 42, P.O. Box, 4002 Basel - Switzerland | | Phone: +41 61 226 19 78 / Fax: +41 61 226 17 01 | =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Re: Firmware upgrade question
None of these. Install the latest one (D0IF_295) that fixes some nasty problems especially if you are using ES-1000s. D0IF_26E regresses a fix that the previous firware had for ES-1000s. There are also a lot fixes related to bad tapes. There is a change to improve cleaning cycle needs and to FINALLY handle the LOCATING error when a tape is damaged on the beginning, especially new ones. We are putting this on in a few days. It is the generally available release to a patch level we needed to reintroduce the fix for ES-1000s. Paul D. Seay, Jr. Technical Specialist Northrop Grumman Information Technology 757-688-8180 -Original Message- From: Jager Frederic (BIL) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 4:04 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Firmware upgrade question Hi, Having a shared 3494 library with 11 3590E1A drives (7 SCSI + 4 fibre), we were told by the CE to upgrade the firmware. We currently use DOIE_350 on all drives. What would you recommend to install as a mandatory firmware level (DOIF_26E, DOIA_572 or DOIB_91D) ? NB : Library manager code level :526.05 Thanks for your answer, Regards, --- JAGER Frédéric - An electronic message is not binding on its sender. Any message referring to a binding engagement must be confirmed in writing and duly signed. -
Re: Occupancy from copy_pool primary_pool ??
Paul, Geirr, Many thanks for your precious help and explanations. What I was triying to achieve was to build a query that would give me an idea of the approximative remaining time before my backup stgpool operations would finish. I thought I could find how much data remained to be copied by subtracting copy_pool occupancy from primary_pool occupancy, but apparently I can't do it that way :-( Thanks anyway ! Arnaud =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= | Arnaud Brion, Panalpina Management Ltd., IT Group | | Viaduktstrasse 42, P.O. Box, 4002 Basel - Switzerland | | Phone: +41 61 226 19 78 / Fax: +41 61 226 17 01 | =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= -Original Message- From: Halvorsen Geirr Gulbrand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 11 February, 2003 10:15 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Occupancy from copy_pool primary_pool ?? Hi I believe Paul is right, but if you want to check for data in copypool, and not in primary pool, do a restore stgpool primarypool preview=yes. It should tell you if there are data in the copypool which are not in primarypool. It also tells you which tapes you need to really perform the restore of the primary pool (if you want to do it -preview=no). Just my 2 cents... Rgds. Geirr G. Halvorsen -Original Message- From: Seay, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10. februar 2003 20:27 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Occupancy from copy_pool primary_pool ?? I think any aggregates that have deleted files in them are still counted as whole. So, if reclamation ever runs against the primary and any copy pools it is highly likely some aggregates in one pool would be reclaimed and in others they may not. The other possibility is you have more than one primary pool which has had a backup stgpool command to the copy pool. Paul D. Seay, Jr. Technical Specialist Northrop Grumman Information Technology 757-688-8180 -Original Message- From: PAC Brion Arnaud [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 12:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Occupancy from copy_pool primary_pool ?? Hi* SM'ers, Could anybody explain me how it is possible that following query : select sum (physical_mb), sum (logical_mb), stgpool_name from occupancy group by stgpool_name shows me copy-pools occupation bigger than primary pools ? I first thought it could be related to space reclamation process, but when I ran that query all reclamation processes where allready finished (same thresholds for both primary and copy pools), so I'm stuck :-( Anybody willing to shed some light on me ? Thanks in advance. Arnaud =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= | Arnaud Brion, Panalpina Management Ltd., IT Group | | Viaduktstrasse 42, P.O. Box, 4002 Basel - Switzerland | | Phone: +41 61 226 19 78 / Fax: +41 61 226 17 01 | =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Re: summary-table
This is why it took soo long for them to actually figure out what the problem was. As it turns out, if the session did not exceed the coded server timeout the problem did not show up on any release of the client or the server. It is when it went over. In order to fix the problem, the client and the server both must be updated if any of your sessions run over the session timeout. Paul D. Seay, Jr. Technical Specialist Northrop Grumman Information Technology 757-688-8180 -Original Message- From: Gill, Geoffrey L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 10:14 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: summary-table It's stuff like this that makes my shake my head in disbelief... The summary table was working fine will ALL my clients, regardless of version, when the server was 4.1.5. After upgrading ONLY the server to 5.1.5. the byte counts in the summary table are Zeroes. When I called support on this they originally told me I had to upgrade my clients to fix it. Once I got a SQL statement that would show the TSM version and amount backed up from Paul, I discovered that they had to be full of it with their suggestion. What I discovered was that not only were some versions coming back with data, other nodes with the same version were coming back with zero's. To throw things off even further even other nodes with the same version did not even show up on the list. I too did not have a problem till I upgraded my server, at last count that was ONE computer. So how is it that I now have to upgrade ALL 160+clients, +1 server to fix it? Geoff Gill TSM Administrator NT Systems Support Engineer SAIC E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (858) 826-4062 Pager: (877) 905-7154
ANS1076E *** Directory path not found ***
Hi all, I4m having some troubles with tsm in directory name level. I have two directories to backup in TSM. Both, have a blank space in the middle of the name like: c:\Tomcat 4.1\ I4ve put on Scheduler c:\Tomcat*4.1\ c:\Tomcat?4.1\ quotes like c:\Tomcat 4.1\ and tried c:\Tomcat 4.1\ and some other combinations like %20 alt+255 and others... Anyone here had a similar experience ? How did you solve it ? It may be in Scheduler not in dsmc or Baclient GUI... Sincerly Thankful, Bpenedo _ MSN Messenger: converse com os seus amigos online. http://messenger.msn.com.br
Re: journal errors - return code 121 \\.\pipe\jnl
Don't have good news other to say that I still see the message at 5.1.5.9 of the client talking to 5.1.5.4 server. Haven't had time to call the support center yet. Working a different call with the support center related to cleanup backupgroups on one of the servers that just went to 5.1.5.4! Curt Magura Lockheed Martin EIS Orlando, Fla. 321-235-1203 -Original Message- From: chris rees [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 3:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: journal errors - return code 121 \\.\pipe\jnl Hi All I'm getting the following from a new client that is running journaling. TSM Client is 5.1.5.2, server is 5.1.5.4. 10-02-2002 09:20:05 NpOpen : Named pipe error connecting to server WaitOnPipe failed. NpOpen: call failed with return code:121 pipe name \\.\pipe\jnl I see there was a similar thread last week ( G.Gill and C.Magura )and wondered if you guys got any further with it. We have a few clients at the above levels using journaling but only 1 seems to be giving the pipe problem. TIA Chris _ Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
Re: MAGSTAR tapes
We need to send some tapes (3590E) offsite, outside the country, and there is a good possibility that the tapes will undergo X-ray checks while en-route. Can anybody advice whether we can take any precautions to safeguard against accidental damage of the tapes ? X-rays affect film, not magnetic media. The only possible area of concern that I know of is in the tapes coming too close to heavy motors used in conveyor belts, but even then the magnetic effects are probably too small to bother the recording. Richard Sims, BU
Re: ANS1076E *** Directory path not found ***
Hi all, I4m having some troubles with tsm in directory name level. I have two directories to backup in TSM. Both, have a blank space in the middle of the name like: c:\Tomcat 4.1\ I4ve put on Scheduler c:\Tomcat*4.1\ c:\Tomcat?4.1\ quotes like c:\Tomcat 4.1\ and tried c:\Tomcat 4.1\ and some other combinations like %20 alt+255 and others... Anyone here had a similar experience ? How did you solve it ? It may be in Scheduler not in dsmc or Baclient GUI... If you're talking about Define Schedule, client type, in the server, the the Admin Ref manual describes what to do, in the explanation of the Objects operand: enclose each path spec in double quotes, and the set of path specs in single quotes. Richard Sims, BU
Re: MAGSTAR tapes
Another point to consider... If they are going by air, they will get very cold. At their destination they may be subject to high levels of condensation, so ensure that they acclimatise (at least 4 hours?)in a sealed container if possible and don't put them into a tape drive until they are at room temperature. Rgds Tony Morgan -Original Message- From: Richard Sims [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 February 2003 12:06 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: MAGSTAR tapes We need to send some tapes (3590E) offsite, outside the country, and there is a good possibility that the tapes will undergo X-ray checks while en-route. Can anybody advice whether we can take any precautions to safeguard against accidental damage of the tapes ? X-rays affect film, not magnetic media. The only possible area of concern that I know of is in the tapes coming too close to heavy motors used in conveyor belts, but even then the magnetic effects are probably too small to bother the recording. Richard Sims, BU This e-mail and any files transmitted with it, are confidential and intended solely for the use of the addressee. The content of this e-mail may have been changed without the consent of the originator. The information supplied must be viewed in this context. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify our Helpdesk by telephone on +44 (0) 20-7444-8444. Any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this e-mail or its attachments is strictly prohibited.
how to expire only version?
Hello All: Our TSM Server Policy domain set Backup only version = 60 (Default),but i try reset server time to ten year after restart TSM server and run accept date and expire inventory,then check the client only version data exists!! why not? how to expire only version data. Thanks Tony W
Fw: Firmware upgrade question
Paul-- where are you getting your code? It's not on the ftp site ftp://service.boulder.ibm.com/storage/3590/code3590/ Is there another place to look? thanks lisa - Forwarded by Lisa Cabanas/SC/MODOT on 02/11/2003 07:22 AM - Seay, Paul seay_pd@NAPTH To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] EON.COM cc: Sent by: Subject: Re: Firmware upgrade question ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] IST.EDU 02/08/2003 12:21 PM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager None of these. Install the latest one (D0IF_295) that fixes some nasty problems especially if you are using ES-1000s. D0IF_26E regresses a fix that the previous firware had for ES-1000s. There are also a lot fixes related to bad tapes. There is a change to improve cleaning cycle needs and to FINALLY handle the LOCATING error when a tape is damaged on the beginning, especially new ones. We are putting this on in a few days. It is the generally available release to a patch level we needed to reintroduce the fix for ES-1000s. Paul D. Seay, Jr. Technical Specialist Northrop Grumman Information Technology 757-688-8180 -Original Message- From: Jager Frederic (BIL) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 4:04 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Firmware upgrade question Hi, Having a shared 3494 library with 11 3590E1A drives (7 SCSI + 4 fibre), we were told by the CE to upgrade the firmware. We currently use DOIE_350 on all drives. What would you recommend to install as a mandatory firmware level (DOIF_26E, DOIA_572 or DOIB_91D) ? NB : Library manager code level :526.05 Thanks for your answer, Regards, --- JAGER Frédéric - An electronic message is not binding on its sender. Any message referring to a binding engagement must be confirmed in writing and duly signed. -
Re: how to expire only version?
I think that the only version = 60 means the last deleted version = 60. Active versions will not be expired. Only inactive ones. So make the only version inactive (exclude it from the back-up / delete it from the client). Next back-up the version will be marked inactive and it will over time be expired. -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Tony W [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Verzonden: dinsdag 11 februari 2003 14:11 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: how to expire only version? Hello All: Our TSM Server Policy domain set Backup only version = 60 (Default),but i try reset server time to ten year after restart TSM server and run accept date and expire inventory,then check the client only version data exists!! why not? how to expire only version data. Thanks Tony W
[no subject]
yes. But they will be the same version. -Original Message- From: Thando Ndaba [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 2:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Hello I just want to know of its possible to run two TSM servers on the same machine. We are running AIX 4.3.3 and TSM 3.7 Regards Thando Ndaba SAPO This e-mail is sent in terms of the following policy/disclaimer. Click on this link http://www.sapo.co.za/mail_disclaimer.htm to read full disclaimer.
LTO 3583 drive problem.
Hi, I have installed TSM 5.1.6 Server on W2k, and after configuring the library and the drives and after checking in some tapes succesfully, Submitting an audit library command I keep getting this error: 02/11/2003 09:37:08 ANR8304E Time out error on drive MT0.12.0.3 (mt0.12.0.3) in library LB0.7.0.3. 02/11/2003 09:37:08 ANR8912E Unable to verify the label of volume from slot-element 16 in drive MT0.12.0.3 (mt0.12.0.3) in library LB0.7.0.3. 02/11/2003 09:37:08 ANR8302E I/O error on drive MT0.12.0.3 (mt0.12.0.3) (OP=OFFL, Error Number=21, CC=0, KEY=02, ASC=3A, ASCQ=00, SENSE=70.00.02.00.00.00.00.1C.00.00.00.00.3A.00.00.00.10- .13.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.04.0- 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.- 00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00- .00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0- 0.00.00.00.00, Description=An undetermined error has occurred). Refer to Appendix D in the 'Messages' manual for recommended action. 02/11/2003 09:37:10 ANR8942E Could not move volume NOT KNOWN from slot-element 256 to slot-element 16. 02/11/2003 09:37:10 ANRD mmsscsi.c(9702): ThreadId34 Volume may still be in the drive MT0.12.0.3 (mt0.12.0.3). 02/11/2003 09:37:10 ANR8446I Manual intervention required for library LB0.7.0.3. It always happens on the MTO.12.0.3 (the lowest drive), Someone know what could be happening? Thanks in advance.
Re: journal errors - return code 121 \\.\pipe\jnl
This error occurs when the journal daemon process attempts to send a response on a named pipe provided by a backup client process and the pipe no longer exists or isn't valid. This can happen if the backup process/session ends or closes the pipe before the journal daemon sends or is finished sending the response or in some cases when the journal daemon is shutting down and cleaning up resources. By itself the error is innocuous but I understand it is annoying to see error messages in the log which can't be explained. Hope this helps Pete Tanenhaus Tivoli Storage Solutions Software Development email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] tieline: 320.8778, external: 607.754.4213 Those who refuse to challenge authority are condemned to conform to it -- Forwarded by Pete Tanenhaus/San Jose/IBM on 02/11/2003 09:14 AM --- Magura, Curtis [EMAIL PROTECTED]@VM.MARIST.EDU on 02/11/2003 06:49:34 AM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by:ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: journal errors - return code 121 \\.\pipe\jnl Don't have good news other to say that I still see the message at 5.1.5.9 of the client talking to 5.1.5.4 server. Haven't had time to call the support center yet. Working a different call with the support center related to cleanup backupgroups on one of the servers that just went to 5.1.5.4! Curt Magura Lockheed Martin EIS Orlando, Fla. 321-235-1203 -Original Message- From: chris rees [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 3:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: journal errors - return code 121 \\.\pipe\jnl Hi All I'm getting the following from a new client that is running journaling. TSM Client is 5.1.5.2, server is 5.1.5.4. 10-02-2002 09:20:05 NpOpen : Named pipe error connecting to server WaitOnPipe failed. NpOpen: call failed with return code:121 pipe name \\.\pipe\jnl I see there was a similar thread last week ( G.Gill and C.Magura )and wondered if you guys got any further with it. We have a few clients at the above levels using journaling but only 1 seems to be giving the pipe problem. TIA Chris _ Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
Re: ANS1076E *** Directory path not found ***
Hi all, I4m having some troubles with tsm in directory name level. I have two directories to backup in TSM. Both, have a blank space in the middle of the name like: c:\Tomcat 4.1\ I4ve put on Scheduler c:\Tomcat*4.1\ c:\Tomcat?4.1\ quotes like c:\Tomcat 4.1\ and tried c:\Tomcat 4.1\ and some other combinations like %20 alt+255 and others... Anyone here had a similar experience ? How did you solve it ? It may be in Scheduler not in dsmc or Baclient GUI... If you're talking about Define Schedule, client type, in the server, the the Admin Ref manual describes what to do, in the explanation of the Objects operand: enclose each path spec in double quotes, and the set of path specs in single quotes. Richard Sims, BU Also, did you restart the scheduler after each change in the include-exclude? I've seen this make a difference. sal Sal Mangiapane Vital Data Systems, LLC
Re: journal errors - return code 121 \\.\pipe\jnl
Pete, What about the message - 02/11/2003 04:02:14 NpPeek: No data. ? We are also seeing this daily in dsmserror on the same clients. Is there a connection? Curt Magura Lockheed Martin EIS Orlando, Fla. 321-235-1203 -Original Message- From: Pete Tanenhaus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 9:18 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: journal errors - return code 121 \\.\pipe\jnl This error occurs when the journal daemon process attempts to send a response on a named pipe provided by a backup client process and the pipe no longer exists or isn't valid. This can happen if the backup process/session ends or closes the pipe before the journal daemon sends or is finished sending the response or in some cases when the journal daemon is shutting down and cleaning up resources. By itself the error is innocuous but I understand it is annoying to see error messages in the log which can't be explained. Hope this helps Pete Tanenhaus Tivoli Storage Solutions Software Development email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] tieline: 320.8778, external: 607.754.4213 Those who refuse to challenge authority are condemned to conform to it -- Forwarded by Pete Tanenhaus/San Jose/IBM on 02/11/2003 09:14 AM --- Magura, Curtis [EMAIL PROTECTED]@VM.MARIST.EDU on 02/11/2003 06:49:34 AM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by:ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: journal errors - return code 121 \\.\pipe\jnl Don't have good news other to say that I still see the message at 5.1.5.9 of the client talking to 5.1.5.4 server. Haven't had time to call the support center yet. Working a different call with the support center related to cleanup backupgroups on one of the servers that just went to 5.1.5.4! Curt Magura Lockheed Martin EIS Orlando, Fla. 321-235-1203 -Original Message- From: chris rees [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 3:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: journal errors - return code 121 \\.\pipe\jnl Hi All I'm getting the following from a new client that is running journaling. TSM Client is 5.1.5.2, server is 5.1.5.4. 10-02-2002 09:20:05 NpOpen : Named pipe error connecting to server WaitOnPipe failed. NpOpen: call failed with return code:121 pipe name \\.\pipe\jnl I see there was a similar thread last week ( G.Gill and C.Magura )and wondered if you guys got any further with it. We have a few clients at the above levels using journaling but only 1 seems to be giving the pipe problem. TIA Chris _ Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
unable to move empty volumes to scratch
Hi all, I am having difculty in moving empty volumes to scratch pool 1. I tried del volume command i am getting the following error ANR1425W Scratch volume VOL109 is empty but will not be deleted - volume state is mountablenotinlib How can i move the empty volumes to scratch? regards Umesh K
Re: how to expire only version?
Hello advance: Thanks for your replaied. If the client node must backup as /tmp directory,but file's name have changed every seconds.Can't the TSM backup file expire? could you give me a hand? Thanks Tony W I think that the only version = 60 means the last deleted version = 60. Active versions will not be expired. Only inactive ones. So make the only version inactive (exclude it from the back-up / delete it from the client). Next back-up the version will be marked inactive and it will over time be expired. -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Tony W [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Verzonden: dinsdag 11 februari 2003 14:11 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: how to expire only version? Hello All: Our TSM Server Policy domain set Backup only version = 60 (Default),but i try reset server time to ten year after restart TSM server and run accept date and expire inventory,then check the client only version data exists!! why not? how to expire only version data. Thanks Tony W
Re: unable to move empty volumes to scratch
Is there a Resuse Delay -Original Message- From: Kempadasiah, Umesh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 8:53 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: unable to move empty volumes to scratch Hi all, I am having difculty in moving empty volumes to scratch pool 1. I tried del volume command i am getting the following error ANR1425W Scratch volume VOL109 is empty but will not be deleted - volume state is mountablenotinlib How can i move the empty volumes to scratch? regards Umesh K
Re: unable to move empty volumes to scratch
Can you give us a q vol vol109 f=d? It seems that this volume hasn't been checked in the library correctly. The volume state says mountable but NOT in library. -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Kempadasiah, Umesh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Verzonden: dinsdag 11 februari 2003 15:53 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: unable to move empty volumes to scratch Hi all, I am having difculty in moving empty volumes to scratch pool 1. I tried del volume command i am getting the following error ANR1425W Scratch volume VOL109 is empty but will not be deleted - volume state is mountablenotinlib How can i move the empty volumes to scratch? regards Umesh K
Re: unable to move empty volumes to scratch
I have checked this into library with status as private if i query the libvol it shows me the volume Thanks and regards Umesh K -Original Message- From: Karel Bos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tue 2/11/2003 10:11 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: Re: unable to move empty volumes to scratch Can you give us a q vol vol109 f=d? It seems that this volume hasn't been checked in the library correctly. The volume state says mountable but NOT in library. -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Kempadasiah, Umesh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Verzonden: dinsdag 11 februari 2003 15:53 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: unable to move empty volumes to scratch Hi all, I am having difculty in moving empty volumes to scratch pool 1. I tried del volume command i am getting the following error ANR1425W Scratch volume VOL109 is empty but will not be deleted - volume state is mountablenotinlib How can i move the empty volumes to scratch? regards Umesh K
Re: journal errors - return code 121 \\.\pipe\jnl
Np errors in the backup client errorlog indicate the opposite condition, that is the backup client is trying to read a response sent from the journal daemon which isn't available at the moment the read is being done. This error can happen if the journal daemon ends (obviously a problem) or (I believe) if the response the backup client is looking for from the journal daemon is still in progress, meaning that the journal daemon hasn't finished processing/sending it. In most cases the response is ready when the backup client goes to read it, but if it isn't the backup client will keep trying to read the response until it either arrives or a timeout occurs (don't know the exact wait time of the top of my head). That being said, I think development (myself) needs to look at the np error logging on both sides and try to eliminate logging messages which aren't really errors, but in some situations it's difficult to determine if an error condition is legitimate and should be logged or if it is innocuous and can be ignored. Hope this helps .. Pete Tanenhaus Tivoli Storage Solutions Software Development email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] tieline: 320.8778, external: 607.754.4213 Those who refuse to challenge authority are condemned to conform to it -- Forwarded by Pete Tanenhaus/San Jose/IBM on 02/11/2003 10:13 AM --- Magura, Curtis [EMAIL PROTECTED]@VM.MARIST.EDU on 02/11/2003 09:27:26 AM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by:ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: journal errors - return code 121 \\.\pipe\jnl Pete, What about the message - 02/11/2003 04:02:14 NpPeek: No data. ? We are also seeing this daily in dsmserror on the same clients. Is there a connection? Curt Magura Lockheed Martin EIS Orlando, Fla. 321-235-1203 -Original Message- From: Pete Tanenhaus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 9:18 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: journal errors - return code 121 \\.\pipe\jnl This error occurs when the journal daemon process attempts to send a response on a named pipe provided by a backup client process and the pipe no longer exists or isn't valid. This can happen if the backup process/session ends or closes the pipe before the journal daemon sends or is finished sending the response or in some cases when the journal daemon is shutting down and cleaning up resources. By itself the error is innocuous but I understand it is annoying to see error messages in the log which can't be explained. Hope this helps Pete Tanenhaus Tivoli Storage Solutions Software Development email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] tieline: 320.8778, external: 607.754.4213 Those who refuse to challenge authority are condemned to conform to it -- Forwarded by Pete Tanenhaus/San Jose/IBM on 02/11/2003 09:14 AM --- Magura, Curtis [EMAIL PROTECTED]@VM.MARIST.EDU on 02/11/2003 06:49:34 AM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by:ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: journal errors - return code 121 \\.\pipe\jnl Don't have good news other to say that I still see the message at 5.1.5.9 of the client talking to 5.1.5.4 server. Haven't had time to call the support center yet. Working a different call with the support center related to cleanup backupgroups on one of the servers that just went to 5.1.5.4! Curt Magura Lockheed Martin EIS Orlando, Fla. 321-235-1203 -Original Message- From: chris rees [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 3:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: journal errors - return code 121 \\.\pipe\jnl Hi All I'm getting the following from a new client that is running journaling. TSM Client is 5.1.5.2, server is 5.1.5.4. 10-02-2002 09:20:05 NpOpen : Named pipe error connecting to server WaitOnPipe failed. NpOpen: call failed with return code:121 pipe name \\.\pipe\jnl I see there was a similar thread last week ( G.Gill and C.Magura )and wondered if you guys got any further with it. We have a few clients at the above levels using journaling but only 1 seems to be giving the pipe problem. TIA Chris _ Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
Re: unable to move empty volumes to scratch
Reuse delay is set to 0 -Original Message- From: Hart, Charles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tue 2/11/2003 9:58 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: Re: unable to move empty volumes to scratch Is there a Resuse Delay -Original Message- From: Kempadasiah, Umesh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 8:53 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: unable to move empty volumes to scratch Hi all, I am having difculty in moving empty volumes to scratch pool 1. I tried del volume command i am getting the following error ANR1425W Scratch volume VOL109 is empty but will not be deleted - volume state is mountablenotinlib How can i move the empty volumes to scratch? regards Umesh K
Re: unable to move empty volumes to scratch
ANR1425W Scratch volume VOL109 is empty but will not be deleted - volume state is mountablenotinlib You may have DRM procedures, or have done a Move Media, to manage the volume in a special way. Your site procedures should prescribe the manner in which the volume returns to the library, and your Activity Log should obviously show how it was put into its current state. Richard Sims, BU How many people bought Dell Systems as recommended by their marijuana smoker?
Re: unable to move empty volumes to scratch
Hi Umesh, Taken from TSM help : ANR1425W Scratch volume volume name is empty but will not be deleted - volume state is mountablenotinlib. Explanation: The named scratch volume is empty but will not be deleted at this time because the state of the volume is MOUNTABLENOTINLIB. System Action: The volume is not deleted. User Response: When the volume is moved by MOVE MEDIA WHERESTATE=MOUNTABLENOTINLIB, the scratch empty volume is deleted. Give a try to move media ! (If in doubt about syntax, issue h move media in TSM command line) Hope it helped ! Arnaud =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= | Arnaud Brion, Panalpina Management Ltd., IT Group | | Viaduktstrasse 42, P.O. Box, 4002 Basel - Switzerland | | Phone: +41 61 226 19 78 / Fax: +41 61 226 17 01 | =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= -Original Message- From: Kempadasiah, Umesh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 11 February, 2003 16:30 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: unable to move empty volumes to scratch Reuse delay is set to 0 -Original Message- From: Hart, Charles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tue 2/11/2003 9:58 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: Re: unable to move empty volumes to scratch Is there a Resuse Delay -Original Message- From: Kempadasiah, Umesh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 8:53 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: unable to move empty volumes to scratch Hi all, I am having difculty in moving empty volumes to scratch pool 1. I tried del volume command i am getting the following error ANR1425W Scratch volume VOL109 is empty but will not be deleted - volume state is mountablenotinlib How can i move the empty volumes to scratch? regards Umesh K
Re: unable to move empty volumes to scratch
Hi, try move media vol109 stgpool=storage_pool_name wherestate=mountablenotinlib You can obtain more info about the command by typing 'help move media' into an admin command line. Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Met vriendelijke groeten, With best regards, Bien amicalement, CU/2, Dirk Billerbeck Dirk Billerbeck GE CompuNet Kiel Enterprise Computing Solutions Am Jaegersberg 20, 24161 Altenholz (Kiel), Germany Phone: +49 (0) 431 / 3609 - 117, Fax: +49 (0) 431 / 3609 - 190, Internet: dirk.billerbeck @ gecits-eu.com This email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not disclose or use the information contained in it. If you have received this mail in error, please tell us immediately by return email and delete the document. [EMAIL PROTECTED]@VM.MARIST.EDU on 11.02.2003 16:29:49 Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: unable to move empty volumes to scratch -- Reuse delay is set to 0 -Original Message- From: Hart, Charles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tue 2/11/2003 9:58 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: Re: unable to move empty volumes to scratch Is there a Resuse Delay -Original Message- From: Kempadasiah, Umesh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 8:53 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: unable to move empty volumes to scratch Hi all, I am having difculty in moving empty volumes to scratch pool 1. I tried del volume command i am getting the following error ANR1425W Scratch volume VOL109 is empty but will not be deleted - volume state is mountablenotinlib How can i move the empty volumes to scratch? regards Umesh K
Re: how to expire only version?
Tony, Are you talking about Retain Only Version that is in the copygroup setting? You can change that by issuing: update copygroup domain name policy set name class name RETOnly=# this is days I think that you can skip this step. I always activate the policy when I make changes in the policy or copygroup. This burned me one before. activate policy set domain name policy set name Then issue your expire inventory command. Sias Get your own 800 number Voicemail, fax, email, and a lot more http://www.ureach.com/reg/tag On, Tony W ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Hello All: Our TSM Server Policy domain set Backup only version = 60 (Default),but i try reset server time to ten year after restart TSM server and run accept date and expire inventory,then check the client only version data exists!! why not? how to expire only version data. Thanks Tony W
Re: unable to move empty volumes to scratch
I tried the move media command , but it says 0 volume found Here is the list of volumes in the stgpool and in the library .. let me know where the problem lies q vol stgpool=arch-pool Volume Name Storage Device EstimatedPct Volume Pool NameClass Name Capacity Util Status (MB) --- -- - - VOL014ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT120,392.2 100.0Full VOL109ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT 0.00.0 Empty VOL116ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT 0.00.0 Empty VOL118ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT 0.00.0 Empty VOL137ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT 0.00.0 Empty VOL138ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT118,390.0 100.0Full VOL143ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT125,231.53.2Full VOL152ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT 0.00.0 Empty VOL155ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT113,164.9 100.0Full VOL156ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT 0.00.0 Empty VOL157ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT126,953.1 100.0Full VOL160ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT 0.00.0 Empty VOL162ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT122,849.83.3Full VOL163ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT102,684.6 56.3Full VOL164ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT126,151.3 100.0Full VOL165ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT124,667.2 41.4Full VOL169ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT130,155.2 100.0Full more... (ENTER to continue, 'C' to cancel) VOL171ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT125,481.1 100.0Full VOL173ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT120,430.8 100.0Full VOL175ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT 70,000.00.5 Filling VOL177ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT123,900.5 100.0Full VOL179ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT119,443.8 100.0Full VOL182ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT114,166.6 100.0 Filling q Libvol Library Name Volume Name Status OwnerLast UseHome Element --- -- -- - IBM-7337 VOL109Private 11 IBM-7337 VOL116Private 14 IBM-7337 VOL118Private 10 IBM-7337 VOL126Scratch 3 IBM-7337 VOL137Private 8 IBM-7337 VOL145Private DbBackup5 IBM-7337 VOL152Private 2 IBM-7337 VOL156Private 7 IBM-7337 VOL160Private 4 IBM-7337 VOL170Scratch 9 IBM-7337 VOL172Private Data0 IBM-7337 VOL174Scratch 6 IBM-7337 VOL175Private Data13 IBM-7337 VOL176Scratch 1 IBM-7337 VOL182Private Data12 Activity log output 02/11/03 11:07:14 ANR2017I Administrator UKEMPADA issued command: MOVE MEDIA * stgpool=arch-pool wherestate=mountablenotinlib 02/11/03 11:07:14 ANR0984I Process 47 for MOVE MEDIA started in the BACKGROUND at 11:07:14. 02/11/03 11:07:14 ANR0609I MOVE MEDIA started as process 47. 02/11/03 11:07:14 ANR0610I MOVE MEDIA started by UKEMPADA as process 47. 02/11/03 11:07:14 ANR6682I MOVE MEDIA command ended: 0 volumes processed. 02/11/03 11:07:14 ANR6691E MOVE MEDIA: No match is found for this move. 02/11/03 11:07:14 ANR0611I MOVE MEDIA started by UKEMPADA as process 47 has ended. 02/11/03 11:07:14 ANR0985I Process 47 for MOVE MEDIA running in the BACKGROUND completed with completion state SUCCESS at 11:07:14. Thanks and regards Umesh K -Original Message- From: Dirk Billerbeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tue 2/11/2003 10:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: Re: unable to move empty volumes to scratch Hi, try move media vol109 stgpool=storage_pool_name wherestate=mountablenotinlib You can obtain more info about the command by typing 'help move media' into an admin command line. Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Met vriendelijke groeten, With best regards,
Re: LTO 3583 drive problem.
Hi, I have exactly the same problem except that I have TSM server on AIX 5.1. It is very strange, because it happens randomly always during unmounting the tape. It is always the same drive - /dev/rmt0. Tape remains in the drive. I can unload tape using operator panel without any problem. But if I want to use tapeutil utility I get following error when I try to open device /dev/rmt0 Operation failed with errno 79: Connection refused I have to reset SAN Data Gateway and then the drive is again accesible with tapeutil and also from TSM server. Does somebody know, what does error message : Operation failed with errno 79: Connection refused mean? Where I can find information about this error number. I was looking in Atape driver doc but there is no mention about this message. In output from errpt there is no error from fibre adapter nor from tape drive. Here is copy of Event log from SAN DAta Gateway: SequenceTime CodeDescription 0031 FEB 11 2003 08:03:45 110 Health Check 1: Link Status Has Changed on FCAL 2: linkFail: 0/0, syncLost: 0/0, sigLost: 0/0, primSpErr: 0/0, invWord: 12/0, invCrc: 0/0 0029 FEB 11 2003 08:03:03 70 NOTICE: Reboot Complete 0028 FEB 11 2003 08:02:59 29 Mapping 1: Target Device Added: index 3, handle 0x091ac308 0027 FEB 11 2003 08:02:59 29 Mapping 1: Target Device Added: index 2, handle 0x09e68408 0023 FEB 11 2003 08:02:57 29 Mapping 1: Target Device Added: index 1, handle 0x09ffbe08 0022 FEB 11 2003 08:02:54 28 USCSI 3: Bus RESET 0021 FEB 11 2003 08:02:53 28 USCSI 2: Bus RESET 0016 FEB 11 2003 08:02:52 28 USCSI 1: Bus RESET 0014 FEB 11 2003 08:02:51 29 Mapping 1: Target Device Added: index 0, handle 0x091b8700 0011 FEB 11 2003 08:02:51 28 USCSI 4: Bus RESET 0010 FEB 11 2003 08:02:51 28 USCSI 3: Bus RESET 0009 FEB 11 2003 08:02:51 28 USCSI 2: Bus RESET 0008 FEB 11 2003 08:02:51 28 USCSI 1: Bus RESET 0057 FEB 11 2003 08:02:20 13 NOTICE: System Shutting Down 0031 FEB 10 2003 03:22:02 110 Health Check 1: Link Status Has Changed on FCAL 2: linkFail: 0/0, syncLost: 0/0, sigLost: 0/0, primSpErr: 0/0, invWord: 12/0, invCrc: 0/0 0029 FEB 10 2003 03:21:20 70 NOTICE: Reboot Complete 0028 FEB 10 2003 03:21:16 29 Mapping 1: Target Device Added: index 3, handle 0x091ac408 0027 FEB 10 2003 03:21:16 29 Mapping 1: Target Device Added: index 2, handle 0x09e68408 0023 FEB 10 2003 03:21:14 29 Mapping 1: Target Device Added: index 1, handle 0x09ffbe08 0022 FEB 10 2003 03:21:11 28 USCSI 3: Bus RESET I am not specialist, but in my opinion there is only messages generated during device rebooting. Any help appreciated Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618 Humberto Gomez Lopez To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] hugomez@UCABcc: .EDU.VE Subject: LTO 3583 drive problem. Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] RIST.EDU 11.02.2003 14:54 Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager Hi, I have installed TSM 5.1.6 Server on W2k, and after configuring the library and the drives and after checking in some tapes succesfully, Submitting an audit library command I keep getting this error: 02/11/2003 09:37:08 ANR8304E Time out error on drive MT0.12.0.3 (mt0.12.0.3) in library LB0.7.0.3. 02/11/2003 09:37:08 ANR8912E Unable to verify the label of volume from slot-element 16 in drive MT0.12.0.3 (mt0.12.0.3) in library LB0.7.0.3. 02/11/2003 09:37:08 ANR8302E I/O error on drive MT0.12.0.3 (mt0.12.0.3) (OP=OFFL, Error Number=21, CC=0, KEY=02, ASC=3A, ASCQ=00, SENSE=70.00.02.00.00.00.00.1C.00.00.00.00.3A.00.00.00.10- .13.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.04.0- 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.- 00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00- .00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0- 0.00.00.00.00, Description=An undetermined error has occurred). Refer to Appendix D in the 'Messages' manual for recommended action. 02/11/2003 09:37:10 ANR8942E Could not move volume NOT KNOWN from slot-element 256 to slot-element 16. 02/11/2003 09:37:10 ANRD mmsscsi.c(9702): ThreadId34 Volume may still be in the drive MT0.12.0.3 (mt0.12.0.3). 02/11/2003 09:37:10 ANR8446I Manual intervention required for library
Re: LTO 3583 drive problem.
Does somebody know, what does error message : Operation failed with errno 79: Connection refused mean? Where I can find information about this error number. ... Know thy operating system. errno is the Unix standard error number, as enumerated in header file /usr/include/sys/errno.h and described in the operating system documentation. From my AIX notes: ECONNREFUSED79 Connection refused. No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. (That system is up, and its TCP/IP is operating, but not the service.) This usually results from trying to connect to a service that is inactive on the foreign host. Richard Sims, BU
Re: unable to move empty volumes to scratch
Umesh, Just try to checkout the volumes out of the library with option force=yes. Then audit the library and checkin as scratch. I did this on my Library too. Balanand Pinni -Original Message- From: Kempadasiah, Umesh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 10:09 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: unable to move empty volumes to scratch I tried the move media command , but it says 0 volume found Here is the list of volumes in the stgpool and in the library .. let me know where the problem lies q vol stgpool=arch-pool Volume Name Storage Device EstimatedPct Volume Pool NameClass Name Capacity Util Status (MB) --- -- - - VOL014ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT120,392.2 100.0Full VOL109ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT 0.00.0 Empty VOL116ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT 0.00.0 Empty VOL118ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT 0.00.0 Empty VOL137ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT 0.00.0 Empty VOL138ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT118,390.0 100.0Full VOL143ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT125,231.53.2Full VOL152ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT 0.00.0 Empty VOL155ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT113,164.9 100.0Full VOL156ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT 0.00.0 Empty VOL157ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT126,953.1 100.0Full VOL160ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT 0.00.0 Empty VOL162ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT122,849.83.3Full VOL163ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT102,684.6 56.3Full VOL164ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT126,151.3 100.0Full VOL165ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT124,667.2 41.4Full VOL169ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT130,155.2 100.0Full more... (ENTER to continue, 'C' to cancel) VOL171ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT125,481.1 100.0Full VOL173ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT120,430.8 100.0Full VOL175ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT 70,000.00.5 Filling VOL177ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT123,900.5 100.0Full VOL179ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT119,443.8 100.0Full VOL182ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT114,166.6 100.0 Filling q Libvol Library Name Volume Name Status OwnerLast UseHome Element --- -- -- - IBM-7337 VOL109Private 11 IBM-7337 VOL116Private 14 IBM-7337 VOL118Private 10 IBM-7337 VOL126Scratch 3 IBM-7337 VOL137Private 8 IBM-7337 VOL145Private DbBackup5 IBM-7337 VOL152Private 2 IBM-7337 VOL156Private 7 IBM-7337 VOL160Private 4 IBM-7337 VOL170Scratch 9 IBM-7337 VOL172Private Data0 IBM-7337 VOL174Scratch 6 IBM-7337 VOL175Private Data13 IBM-7337 VOL176Scratch 1 IBM-7337 VOL182Private Data12 Activity log output 02/11/03 11:07:14 ANR2017I Administrator UKEMPADA issued command: MOVE MEDIA * stgpool=arch-pool wherestate=mountablenotinlib 02/11/03 11:07:14 ANR0984I Process 47 for MOVE MEDIA started in the BACKGROUND at 11:07:14. 02/11/03 11:07:14 ANR0609I MOVE MEDIA started as process 47. 02/11/03 11:07:14 ANR0610I MOVE MEDIA started by UKEMPADA as process 47. 02/11/03 11:07:14 ANR6682I MOVE MEDIA command ended: 0 volumes processed. 02/11/03 11:07:14 ANR6691E MOVE MEDIA: No match is found for this move. 02/11/03 11:07:14 ANR0611I MOVE MEDIA started by UKEMPADA as process 47 has ended. 02/11/03 11:07:14 ANR0985I Process 47 for MOVE MEDIA running in the BACKGROUND completed with completion state SUCCESS at 11:07:14. Thanks and regards Umesh K -Original Message- From: Dirk Billerbeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tue 2/11/2003 10:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: Re: unable to move empty volumes to scratch
Re: journal errors - return code 121 \\.\pipe\jnl
Pete, think you said it all with the statement below! Very confusing in the current state to decide if there is a problem or not. That being said, I think development (myself) needs to look at the np error logging on both sides and try to eliminate logging messages which aren't really errors, but in some situations it's difficult to determine if an error condition is legitimate and should be logged or if it is innocuous and can be ignored. Curt Magura Lockheed Martin EIS Orlando, Fla. 321-235-1203 -Original Message- From: Pete Tanenhaus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 10:27 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: journal errors - return code 121 \\.\pipe\jnl Np errors in the backup client errorlog indicate the opposite condition, that is the backup client is trying to read a response sent from the journal daemon which isn't available at the moment the read is being done. This error can happen if the journal daemon ends (obviously a problem) or (I believe) if the response the backup client is looking for from the journal daemon is still in progress, meaning that the journal daemon hasn't finished processing/sending it. In most cases the response is ready when the backup client goes to read it, but if it isn't the backup client will keep trying to read the response until it either arrives or a timeout occurs (don't know the exact wait time of the top of my head). That being said, I think development (myself) needs to look at the np error logging on both sides and try to eliminate logging messages which aren't really errors, but in some situations it's difficult to determine if an error condition is legitimate and should be logged or if it is innocuous and can be ignored. Hope this helps .. Pete Tanenhaus Tivoli Storage Solutions Software Development email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] tieline: 320.8778, external: 607.754.4213
archive failure
Someone here has gone off and created their own cmd file that TSM launches to do an archive. I can't seem to find anything in the help file on these variables. Maybe someone more familiar with variables can please tell me if this will work. From what I can tell looking at the return codes it looks like it is saying it found nothing to backup and reports a failure. I'm told if they run this cmd file manually from the server it works. Why then would TSM have a problem with it when all it's doing is calling the same file? MonthArchive.cmd chdir /D %ARCHIVE_DIR% dsmc.exe archive -subdir=yes -archmc=month-mgt %ARCHIVE_INCLUDES% System Variables ARCHIVE_DIR=E:\Tivoli\TSM\baclient ARCHIVE_INCLUDES=C:\SAIC\*.* E:\NOTES\*.* dsmerror.log excerpt 02/01/2003 17:59:14 ANS1079E No file specification entered 02/01/2003 17:59:15 ANS1909E The scheduled command failed. 02/01/2003 17:59:15 ANS1512E Scheduled event 'NOTES-MONTH' failed. Return code = 12 dsmsched.log excerpt 01/31/2003 19:26:20 --- SCHEDULEREC QUERY BEGIN 01/31/2003 19:26:20 --- SCHEDULEREC QUERY END 01/31/2003 19:26:20 Next operation scheduled: 01/31/2003 19:26:20 01/31/2003 19:26:20 Schedule Name: NOTES-MONTH 01/31/2003 19:26:20 Action:Command 01/31/2003 19:26:20 Objects: c:\commands\MonthArchive.cmd 01/31/2003 19:26:20 Options: 01/31/2003 19:26:20 Server Window Start: 18:00:00 on 02/01/2003 01/31/2003 19:26:20 01/31/2003 19:26:20 Waiting to be contacted by the server. 02/01/2003 17:59:12 TCP/IP accepted connection from server. 02/01/2003 17:59:12 Querying server for next scheduled event. 02/01/2003 17:59:12 Node Name: CP-ITS-NOTESMTA 02/01/2003 17:59:12 Session established with server ADSM: AIX-RS/6000 02/01/2003 17:59:12 Server Version 5, Release 1, Level 5.2 02/01/2003 17:59:12 Server date/time: 02/01/2003 18:00:24 Last access: 01/31/2003 19:27:32 02/01/2003 17:59:12 --- SCHEDULEREC QUERY BEGIN 02/01/2003 17:59:12 --- SCHEDULEREC QUERY END 02/01/2003 17:59:12 Next operation scheduled: 02/01/2003 17:59:12 02/01/2003 17:59:12 Schedule Name: NOTES-MONTH 02/01/2003 17:59:12 Action:Command 02/01/2003 17:59:12 Objects: c:\commands\MonthArchive.cmd 02/01/2003 17:59:12 Options: 02/01/2003 17:59:12 Server Window Start: 18:00:00 on 02/01/2003 02/01/2003 17:59:12 02/01/2003 17:59:12 Executing scheduled command now. 02/01/2003 17:59:12 Executing Operating System command or script: c:\commands\MonthArchive.cmd 02/01/2003 17:59:15 Finished command. Return code is: 12 02/01/2003 17:59:15 ANS1909E The scheduled command failed. Geoff Gill TSM Administrator NT Systems Support Engineer SAIC E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (858) 826-4062 Pager: (877) 905-7154
Re: unable to move empty volumes to scratch
Hello, do you use the Disaster Recovery Manager? And what do the q vol vol109 f=d and q media commands give as output? Did you try the delete vol vol109 command with the discarddata=yes parameter? Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Met vriendelijke groeten, With best regards, Bien amicalement, CU/2, Dirk Billerbeck Dirk Billerbeck GE CompuNet Kiel Enterprise Computing Solutions Am Jaegersberg 20, 24161 Altenholz (Kiel), Germany Phone: +49 (0) 431 / 3609 - 117, Fax: +49 (0) 431 / 3609 - 190, Internet: dirk.billerbeck @ gecits-eu.com This email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not disclose or use the information contained in it. If you have received this mail in error, please tell us immediately by return email and delete the document. [EMAIL PROTECTED]@VM.MARIST.EDU on 11.02.2003 17:09:00 Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: mailbox.dekelnsm cc: Subject: unable to move empty volumes to scratch -- I tried the move media command , but it says 0 volume found Here is the list of volumes in the stgpool and in the library .. let me know where the problem lies q vol stgpool=arch-pool Volume Name Storage Device EstimatedPct Volume Pool NameClass Name Capacity Util Status (MB) --- -- - - VOL014ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT120,392.2 100.0Full VOL109ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT 0.00.0 Empty VOL116ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT 0.00.0 Empty VOL118ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT 0.00.0 Empty VOL137ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT 0.00.0 Empty VOL138ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT118,390.0 100.0Full VOL143ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT125,231.53.2Full VOL152ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT 0.00.0 Empty VOL155ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT113,164.9 100.0Full VOL156ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT 0.00.0 Empty VOL157ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT126,953.1 100.0Full VOL160ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT 0.00.0 Empty VOL162ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT122,849.83.3Full VOL163ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT102,684.6 56.3Full VOL164ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT126,151.3 100.0Full VOL165ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT124,667.2 41.4Full VOL169ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT130,155.2 100.0Full more... (ENTER to continue, 'C' to cancel) VOL171ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT125,481.1 100.0Full VOL173ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT120,430.8 100.0Full VOL175ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT 70,000.00.5 Filling VOL177ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT123,900.5 100.0Full VOL179ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT119,443.8 100.0Full VOL182ARCH-POOLAUTO-DLT114,166.6 100.0 Filling q Libvol Library Name Volume Name Status OwnerLast UseHome Element --- -- -- - IBM-7337 VOL109Private 11 IBM-7337 VOL116Private 14 IBM-7337 VOL118Private 10 IBM-7337 VOL126Scratch 3 IBM-7337 VOL137Private 8 IBM-7337 VOL145Private DbBackup5 IBM-7337 VOL152Private 2 IBM-7337 VOL156Private 7 IBM-7337 VOL160Private 4 IBM-7337 VOL170Scratch 9 IBM-7337 VOL172Private Data0 IBM-7337 VOL174Scratch 6 IBM-7337 VOL175Private Data13 IBM-7337 VOL176Scratch 1 IBM-7337 VOL182Private Data12 Activity log output 02/11/03 11:07:14 ANR2017I Administrator UKEMPADA issued command: MOVE MEDIA * stgpool=arch-pool wherestate=mountablenotinlib 02/11/03 11:07:14 ANR0984I Process 47
Re: archive failure
If you are referring to the ARCHIVE_DIR and ARCHIVE_INCLUDES variables, you won't find anything in the TSM doc about these. These are arbitrary environment variables created by your user. After the environment variables were created, was the scheduler restarted so that it would pick them up? Also, have you confirmed that these are indeed system (and not user) variables? If they are user variables, then unless the scheduler is using the same account, the scheduler's environment won't have these defined. If none of the above addresses the issue, then you can modify the script to include some diagnostics. My suggestion: @echo off set diagfile=c:\diagfile.txt REM *** Confirm environment variables echo *** ENVIRONMENT VARIABLES *** %diagfile% set %diagfile% REM *** Confirm current directory echo *** CURRENT DIRECTORY *** %diagfile% cd %diagfile% cd /d %ARCHIVE_DIR% REM *** Confirm current directory echo *** TSM DIRECTORY *** %diagfile% cd %diagfile% REM *** Run the archive echo *** RUNNING ARCHIVE COMMAND NOW *** %diagfile% dsmc archive %ARCHIVE_INCLUDES% -subdir=yes -archmc=month-mgt %diagfile% 21 set tsmrc=%errorlevel% echo *** ARCHIVE COMPLETE RC = %tsmrc% *** %diagfile% Let the scheduler run the command, then check c:\diagfile.txt to see what it shows. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/IBM@IBMUS Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (change eye to i to reply) The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. Good enough is the enemy of excellence. Someone here has gone off and created their own cmd file that TSM launches to do an archive. I can't seem to find anything in the help file on these variables. Maybe someone more familiar with variables can please tell me if this will work. From what I can tell looking at the return codes it looks like it is saying it found nothing to backup and reports a failure. I'm told if they run this cmd file manually from the server it works. Why then would TSM have a problem with it when all it's doing is calling the same file? MonthArchive.cmd chdir /D %ARCHIVE_DIR% dsmc.exe archive -subdir=yes -archmc=month-mgt %ARCHIVE_INCLUDES% System Variables ARCHIVE_DIR=E:\Tivoli\TSM\baclient ARCHIVE_INCLUDES=C:\SAIC\*.* E:\NOTES\*.* dsmerror.log excerpt 02/01/2003 17:59:14 ANS1079E No file specification entered 02/01/2003 17:59:15 ANS1909E The scheduled command failed. 02/01/2003 17:59:15 ANS1512E Scheduled event 'NOTES-MONTH' failed. Return code = 12 dsmsched.log excerpt 01/31/2003 19:26:20 --- SCHEDULEREC QUERY BEGIN 01/31/2003 19:26:20 --- SCHEDULEREC QUERY END 01/31/2003 19:26:20 Next operation scheduled: 01/31/2003 19:26:20 01/31/2003 19:26:20 Schedule Name: NOTES-MONTH 01/31/2003 19:26:20 Action:Command 01/31/2003 19:26:20 Objects: c:\commands\MonthArchive.cmd 01/31/2003 19:26:20 Options: 01/31/2003 19:26:20 Server Window Start: 18:00:00 on 02/01/2003 01/31/2003 19:26:20 01/31/2003 19:26:20 Waiting to be contacted by the server. 02/01/2003 17:59:12 TCP/IP accepted connection from server. 02/01/2003 17:59:12 Querying server for next scheduled event. 02/01/2003 17:59:12 Node Name: CP-ITS-NOTESMTA 02/01/2003 17:59:12 Session established with server ADSM: AIX-RS/6000 02/01/2003 17:59:12 Server Version 5, Release 1, Level 5.2 02/01/2003 17:59:12 Server date/time: 02/01/2003 18:00:24 Last access: 01/31/2003 19:27:32 02/01/2003 17:59:12 --- SCHEDULEREC QUERY BEGIN 02/01/2003 17:59:12 --- SCHEDULEREC QUERY END 02/01/2003 17:59:12 Next operation scheduled: 02/01/2003 17:59:12 02/01/2003 17:59:12 Schedule Name: NOTES-MONTH 02/01/2003 17:59:12 Action:Command 02/01/2003 17:59:12 Objects: c:\commands\MonthArchive.cmd 02/01/2003 17:59:12 Options: 02/01/2003 17:59:12 Server Window Start: 18:00:00 on 02/01/2003 02/01/2003 17:59:12 02/01/2003 17:59:12 Executing scheduled command now. 02/01/2003 17:59:12 Executing Operating System command or script: c:\commands\MonthArchive.cmd 02/01/2003 17:59:15 Finished command. Return code is: 12 02/01/2003 17:59:15 ANS1909E The scheduled command failed. Geoff Gill TSM Administrator NT Systems Support Engineer SAIC E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (858) 826-4062 Pager: (877) 905-7154
Tape question
I know this has been covered before but I can't find it. Does anyone have a sql query that will tell me what tapes a particular nodes particular archive is on? Thanks in advance, Mark Remeta Confidentiality Note: The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to whom or which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you receive this in error, please delete this material immediately.
Re: Tape question
-Original Message- From: Remeta, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 9:14 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Tape question I know this has been covered before but I can't find it. Does anyone have a sql query that will tell me what tapes a particular nodes particular archive is on? select volume_name,filespace_name from volumeusage where node_name='NODE NAME' Throwing in the file space name allows you to see what specific file space is stored on each tape. Hope this helps. Peter Peter Ford System Engineer Stentor, Inc. 5000 Marina Blvd, Brisbane, CA 94005-1811 Main Phone: 650-228- Fax: 650 228-5566 http://www.stentor.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tape question
Mark Try this one name of script vol_node: run vol_node 'SYSTEM_1' 'SCA_PC' select volume_name, stgpool_name, filespace_name from volumeusage where node_name='$1' and stgpool_name='$2' Regards Robert Ouzen Haifa University Israel -Original Message- From: Remeta, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 7:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Tape question I know this has been covered before but I can't find it. Does anyone have a sql query that will tell me what tapes a particular nodes particular archive is on? Thanks in advance, Mark Remeta Confidentiality Note: The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to whom or which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you receive this in error, please delete this material immediately.
Re: Diskpool error
Mark, Thanks for the reply. I was talking with the DBA for the client in question. It looks like he requires 130gb and the diskpool's estimated capacity in MB's is 107668.0 It sounds like we are going to have to buy more disk. Tommy - Original Message - From: Darby, Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 5:53 PM Subject: Re: Diskpool error Tommy, the following must be true for the situation in question: 1. the disk storage pool in question has CACHE turned on 2. COMPRESSION=YES is in effect for the client in question 3. COMPRESSALWAYS=NO is NOT in effect for the client in question 4. the file being backed up at the time of the error was growing as a result of compression The reason it is happening is because the above are all in effect and is explained by the following partial description of the backup process: 1. when a file is to be backed up by the client, it provides the server with an estimate of the amount of space required to store the file 2. when, because of compression, a file grows during the backup, the client revises its estimate with the server and, when COMPRESSALWAYS=YES (the default) is in effect, continues sending the file, still compressing it 3. when CACHE is turned on for the storage pool in question, the server does not check the CACHEd file space for room based on the revised estimate (even though it does so at the beginning - in step 1 above) 4. if the server does not find actual free space (not including cached file space that COULD be freed to make room to store the file), the server responds as indicated in your problem situation. There are lots of ways to solve this problem, including using COMPRESSALWAYS=NO or turning off COMPRESSION altogether (e.g., COMPRESSION=NO), or (just for the file in question) using (if supported by the client platform/level) exclude.compression. You can also turn off caching for the storage pool in question - does it actually provide you any real benefit, anyway? Regards, Mark -Original Message- From: Tommy Templeton To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 2/10/03 5:38 PM Subject: Diskpool error I got this error during one of my weekend backups. Is anyone else familiar with diskpool errors like this? Thanks. 02/09/03 03:44:25 ANR0534W Transaction failed for session 184 for node SP2MN5F0 (DB2/6000) - size estimate exceeded and server is unable to obtain additional space in storage pool DISKPOOL. Tommy Templeton Senior System Administrator DFA-MMRS 601-359-3106 e-mail - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tape question
Hi, i tried a variation of your SQL, viz. select node_name, filespace_name from volumeusage where volume_name='' - i ran this query on a volume containing objects from a remote server. it worked fine, but before giving the result, it came back with a TSM prompt saying : This SQL query might generate a big table, or take a long time. Do you wish to continue ? Y/N i want to run this SQL in a batch file for many similar volumes, is there any way i can suppress the above-mentioned TSM prompt ? -Original Message- From: Peter Ford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tue, February 11, 2003 8:20 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Tape question -Original Message- From: Remeta, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 9:14 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Tape question I know this has been covered before but I can't find it. Does anyone have a sql query that will tell me what tapes a particular nodes particular archive is on? select volume_name,filespace_name from volumeusage where node_name='NODE NAME' Throwing in the file space name allows you to see what specific file space is stored on each tape. Hope this helps. Peter Peter Ford System Engineer Stentor, Inc. 5000 Marina Blvd, Brisbane, CA 94005-1811 Main Phone: 650-228- Fax: 650 228-5566 http://www.stentor.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tape question
This works good however I only want the tapes from the last archive I ran which was the first of January. This query gives me all the volumes from the beginning of time that have that nodes filespace in it.. clear as mud? -Original Message- From: Peter Ford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 12:20 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Tape question -Original Message- From: Remeta, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 9:14 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Tape question I know this has been covered before but I can't find it. Does anyone have a sql query that will tell me what tapes a particular nodes particular archive is on? select volume_name,filespace_name from volumeusage where node_name='NODE NAME' Throwing in the file space name allows you to see what specific file space is stored on each tape. Hope this helps. Peter Peter Ford System Engineer Stentor, Inc. 5000 Marina Blvd, Brisbane, CA 94005-1811 Main Phone: 650-228- Fax: 650 228-5566 http://www.stentor.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Confidentiality Note: The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to whom or which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you receive this in error, please delete this material immediately.
Once Last Journal Question to Pete
Pete, Since we've been trading notes on the Journal Service this morning once last question please. Is there a documented limit to the number of drives that can added to the Journal service? I can't seem to get more than 10-11 drives configured. After that the Journal service will fail to start. I've poked around in the manuals a bit but haven't found anything that states there is a limit. We've got a couple of fileservers pushing 20 drives. Can you help clear this last question up? Client 5.1.5.9 on both NT 4 and Win2K. Server 5.1.5.4 on AIX. Curt Magura Lockheed Martin EIS Orlando, Fla. 321-235-1203
Once Last Journal Question to Pete
The limit is 255 but apar IC35394 was opened against a problem which causes the journal daemon to crash when configured with more than 15 drives (15 is ok, 16 or more crashes). The fix for this should be included in the next ptf but you might want to check with support to be sure. Hope this helps Pete Tanenhaus Tivoli Storage Solutions Software Development email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] tieline: 320.8778, external: 607.754.4213 Those who refuse to challenge authority are condemned to conform to it -- Forwarded by Pete Tanenhaus/San Jose/IBM on 02/11/2003 01:13 PM --- Magura, Curtis [EMAIL PROTECTED]@VM.MARIST.EDU on 02/11/2003 12:59:55 PM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by:ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Once Last Journal Question to Pete Pete, Since we've been trading notes on the Journal Service this morning once last question please. Is there a documented limit to the number of drives that can added to the Journal service? I can't seem to get more than 10-11 drives configured. After that the Journal service will fail to start. I've poked around in the manuals a bit but haven't found anything that states there is a limit. We've got a couple of fileservers pushing 20 drives. Can you help clear this last question up? Client 5.1.5.9 on both NT 4 and Win2K. Server 5.1.5.4 on AIX. Curt Magura Lockheed Martin EIS Orlando, Fla. 321-235-1203
Re: Once Last Journal Question to Pete
Thank you sirgood info! I wish I could get all of the drives but I'll take 15 drivesI'll give support a call sometime in the next few days. Curt Magura Lockheed Martin EIS Orlando, Fla. 321-235-1203 -Original Message- From: Pete Tanenhaus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 1:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Once Last Journal Question to Pete The limit is 255 but apar IC35394 was opened against a problem which causes the journal daemon to crash when configured with more than 15 drives (15 is ok, 16 or more crashes). The fix for this should be included in the next ptf but you might want to check with support to be sure. Hope this helps Pete Tanenhaus Tivoli Storage Solutions Software Development email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] tieline: 320.8778, external: 607.754.4213 Those who refuse to challenge authority are condemned to conform to it -- Forwarded by Pete Tanenhaus/San Jose/IBM on 02/11/2003 01:13 PM --- Magura, Curtis [EMAIL PROTECTED]@VM.MARIST.EDU on 02/11/2003 12:59:55 PM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by:ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Once Last Journal Question to Pete Pete, Since we've been trading notes on the Journal Service this morning once last question please. Is there a documented limit to the number of drives that can added to the Journal service? I can't seem to get more than 10-11 drives configured. After that the Journal service will fail to start. I've poked around in the manuals a bit but haven't found anything that states there is a limit. We've got a couple of fileservers pushing 20 drives. Can you help clear this last question up? Client 5.1.5.9 on both NT 4 and Win2K. Server 5.1.5.4 on AIX. Curt Magura Lockheed Martin EIS Orlando, Fla. 321-235-1203
Re: journal errors - return code 121 \\.\pipe\jnl
I understand the concern, the point I was trying to make was that in some cases it's difficult to determine if particular return codes merit something being written to the errorlog. In the case of a named pipe error (on either the journal daemon or the backup client) it isn't easy to determine if the error occurs because the other process has terminated (or timed out) either normally or abnormally. All that having been said, the error messages in question really provide diagnostic information that probably isn't all that useful to the end user and is really is only useful to development or support when attempting to track down problems in the field. So I agree that the messages should either be more meaningful or shouldn't be in the errorlog at all (probably more appropriate for the client tracing facility). By the way, I tracked down the specific message in this thread ( return code 121 \\.\pipe\jnl). There are two types of named pipes used to communicate between the two processes (journal daemin and b/a client). One named pipe (\\.\pipe\jnl) name is created by the journal daemon during startup and is used to receive inbound requests from the b/a client. The b/a client determines if the journal daemon is running by attempting to connect to this pipe. Return code 121 indicates that the b/a client timed out attempting to connect to the pipe, which most likely means that the journal daemon isn't running. I think a more accurate message in the errorlog would be something like Connection to Journal Daemon timed out (and the specific return code could be documented with tracing on). The other type(s) of named pipes are created by the b/a client and used to receive responses from the journal daemon. There is at least one response pipe created by the b/a client for each backup session (and with multi-threaded backup possible more since there can be multiple backup sessions). Any request sent to the journal daemon which requires a response includes this response pipe name. When the journal daemon processes the response, it connects to the supplied response pipe and sends response data on it as needed. The b/a client backup session waits for data to arrive on the response pipe and the reads it. An example of this would be a request from the b/a client to query all of the objects in the journal for a particular file system. The b/a client creates a pipe for the journal daemon to send the list of matching objects on, and supplies the name of this pipe to the journal daemon in the query request. The journal daemon processes the query request, connects to the supplied pipe, performs the query, and sends the responses on the pipe.. The b/a client expects to look (peeks) at the request pipe to determine if there is any response data to read and continues to read until it is empty. Usually data will be available on the response pipe as soon as the b/a client requests it, but in some cases (as with very long running queries) the journal daemon doesn't post the data on the response pipe in time and the b/a client must continue to look (peek) at the pipe until it arrives. I believe the above condition is the source of the NpPeek: No data message in the errorlog. Since the b/a client will eventually timeout the session if the data isn't received on the response pipe in a reasonable amount of time, I don't see any use of logging the above message, so I will remove it in a future release/ptf. Anyway, I hope this helps . Pete Tanenhaus Tivoli Storage Solutions Software Development email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] tieline: 320.8778, external: 607.754.4213 Those who refuse to challenge authority are condemned to conform to it -- Forwarded by Pete Tanenhaus/San Jose/IBM on 02/11/2003 11:58 AM --- Magura, Curtis [EMAIL PROTECTED]@VM.MARIST.EDU on 02/11/2003 11:32:26 AM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by:ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: journal errors - return code 121 \\.\pipe\jnl Pete, think you said it all with the statement below! Very confusing in the current state to decide if there is a problem or not. That being said, I think development (myself) needs to look at the np error logging on both sides and try to eliminate logging messages which aren't really errors, but in some situations it's difficult to determine if an error condition is legitimate and should be logged or if it is innocuous and can be ignored. Curt Magura Lockheed Martin EIS Orlando, Fla. 321-235-1203 -Original Message- From: Pete Tanenhaus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 10:27 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: journal errors - return code 121 \\.\pipe\jnl Np errors in the backup client errorlog indicate the opposite condition, that is the backup client is trying to read a response sent from the journal daemon which isn't available at the
Vedr.: Re: Tape question
Hi, Yes, you can suppress the prompt. Just do: dsmadmc -noconfirm Allan Hansen Munk IT A/S Egelundsvej 18 5260 Odense S Denmark Ubhaykar, Nitin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt af: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11-02-2003 18:43 Besvar venligst til ADSM: Dist Stor Manager Til:[EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Vedr.: Re: Tape question Hi, i tried a variation of your SQL, viz. select node_name, filespace_name from volumeusage where volume_name='' - i ran this query on a volume containing objects from a remote server. it worked fine, but before giving the result, it came back with a TSM prompt saying : This SQL query might generate a big table, or take a long time. Do you wish to continue ? Y/N i want to run this SQL in a batch file for many similar volumes, is there any way i can suppress the above-mentioned TSM prompt ? -Original Message- From: Peter Ford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tue, February 11, 2003 8:20 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Tape question -Original Message- From: Remeta, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 9:14 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Tape question I know this has been covered before but I can't find it. Does anyone have a sql query that will tell me what tapes a particular nodes particular archive is on? select volume_name,filespace_name from volumeusage where node_name='NODE NAME' Throwing in the file space name allows you to see what specific file space is stored on each tape. Hope this helps. Peter Peter Ford System Engineer Stentor, Inc. 5000 Marina Blvd, Brisbane, CA 94005-1811 Main Phone: 650-228- Fax: 650 228-5566 http://www.stentor.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tape question
ok I think I have it figured out... here's what I got select volumeusage.volume_name from volumeusage,volumes where volumeusage.node_name='nodename' and volumeusage.filespace_name='filespacename' and volumeusage.stgpool_name='stgpoolname' and volumes.last_write_date'-mm-dd' and volumeusage.volume_name=volumes.volume_name This will list the volumes that nodename/filespacename is on in storage pool stgpoolname that was written after a certain date(-mm-dd). Cheers! -Original Message- From: Peter Ford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 12:20 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Tape question -Original Message- From: Remeta, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 9:14 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Tape question I know this has been covered before but I can't find it. Does anyone have a sql query that will tell me what tapes a particular nodes particular archive is on? select volume_name,filespace_name from volumeusage where node_name='NODE NAME' Throwing in the file space name allows you to see what specific file space is stored on each tape. Hope this helps. Peter Peter Ford System Engineer Stentor, Inc. 5000 Marina Blvd, Brisbane, CA 94005-1811 Main Phone: 650-228- Fax: 650 228-5566 http://www.stentor.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Confidentiality Note: The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to whom or which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you receive this in error, please delete this material immediately.
ITSM For Mail - Domino problems
Hi All First off : TSM Server 5.1.5.4 on solaris TSM Client on Windows 2000 5.1.5.9 ITSM for mail 5.1.5.0 I installed tsm client and Mail client and everything went fine. Registered both the OS client and the Mail client. When I run domdsmc q adsmserv I get a response from my tsm server. when I run domdsmc q domino, thew command just hangs there and I get no response. When I first run the command I get a C++ error (don't have it in front of me and do not have access to it at the moment). There are no errors in any .log file and in the event log. Any help would be appreciated Thanks Guillaume Gilbert Conseiller - Gestion du stockage CGI - Gestion intégré des technologies TEL. : (514) 281-7000 ext 3642 Pager : (514) 957-2615 Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ITSM For Mail - Domino problems
I had this same problem it turned out to be McAfee Groupshield keeping TDP from connecting to Domino. We are using Groupshield 5.2 and we had to add DOMDSMC and DOMDSM to the application exclusion list in the server settings database for Groupshield Greg Redell Great-West Life Annuity Insurance Co. Phone: 314-525-5877 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Don't try to fix it, unless you understand it. |-+-- | | Guillaume Gilbert | | | guillaume.gilbert@DESJ| | | ARDINS.COM| | | Sent by: ADSM: Dist | | | Stor Manager | | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | | | | | | | | 02/11/2003 02:33 PM| | | Please respond to | | | ADSM: Dist Stor | | | Manager | |-+-- --| | | | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: ITSM For Mail - Domino problems | --| Hi All First off : TSM Server 5.1.5.4 on solaris TSM Client on Windows 2000 5.1.5.9 ITSM for mail 5.1.5.0 I installed tsm client and Mail client and everything went fine. Registered both the OS client and the Mail client. When I run domdsmc q adsmserv I get a response from my tsm server. when I run domdsmc q domino, thew command just hangs there and I get no response. When I first run the command I get a C++ error (don't have it in front of me and do not have access to it at the moment). There are no errors in any .log file and in the event log. Any help would be appreciated Thanks Guillaume Gilbert Conseiller - Gestion du stockage CGI - Gestion intégré des technologies TEL. : (514) 281-7000 ext 3642 Pager : (514) 957-2615 Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
q stg shows pct util 100%
Hi All, Problem is like this,I dont know whether it is a problem or a bug,specially when TSM installed on solaris machine,library is 3583. Problem 1) I have one node register in one tsm server and its data is in two volume, T00032 and T00044. but, when I did q vol, it shows est. capacity(MB) 0.0 and pct util 0.0 and volume status as filling. When I do q content T00032, output show there is a data in the volume. Problem 2) when I do q stg, it shows (Tapepool)est. capacity(MB) 0.0 and pct util 100 q devc 3583 f=d shows: Est/Max Max Capacity(MB): (Blank) So, my problem is to know the total stgpool capacity,and pct util in the volume. Backup is going well, client schedule is completed daily,that means backup is there in the two volume. Can anyone give solution. Thanks, Viv
Missing files
I have a client with a missing files problem. Around midnight Jan 25/26, TSM did an incremental on a WinNT box. All three file systems show as completed in q fi f=d. Some time thereafter, but before 1/28, the harddrive went south. On 1/29 directories from c$ were restored on a new machine. Thousands of ifles are missing. Where did they go? Select on ll_name for the appropriate hl_name and node_name from backups finds nothing. Select on hl_name for the appropriate ll_name and node_name from backups finds nothing. Combine these queries with the completed backup from 1/26 and what can we believe but that the files were not there to backup. Moreover, the sysadmin says there were file-shares on another machine(s), which have yet to be identified. However, the owner says the missing files were on his harddrive before and after the last sucessful backup. As he is adamant that the missing files cannot be on a share somewhere, I have suggested that his hardware problem crept up on him, making the directory gradually and increasingly unreliable during backup. I know this is clutching at straws, but in almost a decade, this is the first instance of missing files. Can anyone suggest a better explanation, or ste of possible explanations, than I have offered? Fred Johanson
Re: LTO 3583 drive problem.
I have seen some messages here recently about 3583 drive errors. I have a 3584 with (8) Fibre drives going through McData switches. with TSM Server 4.2.2.10 on AIX 4.3.3 ML 10 and Atape sdriver 7.1.1.0. 3584 library code 2460 and drive code 25D4. Have had 3584 about a year. Have had intermittant errors maybe 2-3 times a month, but noticed that were only happening on DRIVE1 which has control path. Moved Control path to DRIVE5 and sure enough the errors were then happening on that drive. Working with our IBM CE on this for several months, IBM Tucson initially was saying that the errors we were getting were media errors. But I could reuse tha same tape and it would have no more problems. On some instances, the tape would not be dismounted from drive but have to have drive reset for eject. Finally in late December my IBM CE called and said that IBM Tucson had seen this problem all over and it was happeing on the Fibre Drives, the drive that the Control Path was on and going through either IBM 2109 or McData switches. These were the common factors. IBM is working on a code fix (I assume for drives and/or library). I suspect problem could be happening on 3583 also. David Longo [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/11/03 11:10AM Hi, I have exactly the same problem except that I have TSM server on AIX 5.1. It is very strange, because it happens randomly always during unmounting the tape. It is always the same drive - /dev/rmt0. Tape remains in the drive. I can unload tape using operator panel without any problem. But if I want to use tapeutil utility I get following error when I try to open device /dev/rmt0 Operation failed with errno 79: Connection refused I have to reset SAN Data Gateway and then the drive is again accesible with tapeutil and also from TSM server. Does somebody know, what does error message : Operation failed with errno 79: Connection refused mean? Where I can find information about this error number. I was looking in Atape driver doc but there is no mention about this message. In output from errpt there is no error from fibre adapter nor from tape drive. Here is copy of Event log from SAN DAta Gateway: SequenceTime CodeDescription 0031 FEB 11 2003 08:03:45 110 Health Check 1: Link Status Has Changed on FCAL 2: linkFail: 0/0, syncLost: 0/0, sigLost: 0/0, primSpErr: 0/0, invWord: 12/0, invCrc: 0/0 0029 FEB 11 2003 08:03:03 70 NOTICE: Reboot Complete 0028 FEB 11 2003 08:02:59 29 Mapping 1: Target Device Added: index 3, handle 0x091ac308 0027 FEB 11 2003 08:02:59 29 Mapping 1: Target Device Added: index 2, handle 0x09e68408 0023 FEB 11 2003 08:02:57 29 Mapping 1: Target Device Added: index 1, handle 0x09ffbe08 0022 FEB 11 2003 08:02:54 28 USCSI 3: Bus RESET 0021 FEB 11 2003 08:02:53 28 USCSI 2: Bus RESET 0016 FEB 11 2003 08:02:52 28 USCSI 1: Bus RESET 0014 FEB 11 2003 08:02:51 29 Mapping 1: Target Device Added: index 0, handle 0x091b8700 0011 FEB 11 2003 08:02:51 28 USCSI 4: Bus RESET 0010 FEB 11 2003 08:02:51 28 USCSI 3: Bus RESET 0009 FEB 11 2003 08:02:51 28 USCSI 2: Bus RESET 0008 FEB 11 2003 08:02:51 28 USCSI 1: Bus RESET 0057 FEB 11 2003 08:02:20 13 NOTICE: System Shutting Down 0031 FEB 10 2003 03:22:02 110 Health Check 1: Link Status Has Changed on FCAL 2: linkFail: 0/0, syncLost: 0/0, sigLost: 0/0, primSpErr: 0/0, invWord: 12/0, invCrc: 0/0 0029 FEB 10 2003 03:21:20 70 NOTICE: Reboot Complete 0028 FEB 10 2003 03:21:16 29 Mapping 1: Target Device Added: index 3, handle 0x091ac408 0027 FEB 10 2003 03:21:16 29 Mapping 1: Target Device Added: index 2, handle 0x09e68408 0023 FEB 10 2003 03:21:14 29 Mapping 1: Target Device Added: index 1, handle 0x09ffbe08 0022 FEB 10 2003 03:21:11 28 USCSI 3: Bus RESET I am not specialist, but in my opinion there is only messages generated during device rebooting. Any help appreciated Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618 Humberto Gomez Lopez To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] hugomez@UCABcc: .EDU.VE Subject: LTO 3583 drive problem. Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] RIST.EDU 11.02.2003 14:54 Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager Hi, I have installed TSM 5.1.6 Server on W2k, and after configuring the library and the drives and after checking in some tapes succesfully, Submitting an audit library command I keep getting this error: 02/11/2003 09:37:08 ANR8304E Time out error on drive MT0.12.0.3 (mt0.12.0.3)
api and backupset
hello everyone! I'm using TSM API to write a program, but after I make a backupset(the files in TSM was archived by using APIs and the backupset was generated by using TSM server command gene backupset), I found it can not be restored by TSM Client. And I found TSM client help '57' said: Note: There is no support in the API for the backup set format. Therefore, backup set data that was backed up via the API cannot be restored or used. Is it means that I CAN NOT USE BACKUPSET function in my application? Can anyone enlight me?
