collocated storage pool issue
Hi guys, I have uncollocated storage pool that stores all the client data in 3494 tape library and I created a new collocated storage pool and redirected all new client data to be stored on it. Each tape in the collocated storage pool is supposed to have one node data (if the pool has empty tapes as I know) but what I foud in the new storage pool is different I found that some of the nodes data are stored in one tape. Could any one tell me if this is normal? and if it is not how can I force each tape to have one client data? I have TSM 5.1.5 on AIX 4.3.3 Regards, Abdulaziz
Error backuping Certificate Server Database on win2k client
Hi list, W have a problem here, while trying to backup a win2k system (v 5.00.2195 SP 3) using a TSM client version 5.1.5.15 : the backup consistently finishes with status failed, and following message can be found in dsmerror.log : 07/16/2003 00:50:49 ANS1183E An unknown error occurred while processing system object 'Certificate Server Database': MS API function 'CertSrvBackupRead' failed with error 6 (0x0006) 07/16/2003 00:50:53 ANS4034E Error processing '': unknown system error 07/16/2003 00:50:53 ANS1512E Scheduled event 'BACKUP_NT' failed. Return code = 12. In dsmsched log, everything looks fine, until the end of the backup where those entries arise : 07/16/2003 00:50:53 --- SCHEDULEREC STATUS BEGIN 07/16/2003 00:50:53 Total number of objects inspected: 47,188 07/16/2003 00:50:53 Total number of objects backed up: 59 07/16/2003 00:50:53 Total number of objects updated: 0 07/16/2003 00:50:53 Total number of objects rebound: 0 07/16/2003 00:50:53 Total number of objects deleted: 0 07/16/2003 00:50:53 Total number of objects expired: 1 07/16/2003 00:50:53 Total number of objects failed: 0 07/16/2003 00:50:53 Total number of bytes transferred: 9.15 MB 07/16/2003 00:50:53 Data transfer time:0.75 sec 07/16/2003 00:50:53 Network data transfer rate:12,494.63 KB/sec 07/16/2003 00:50:53 Aggregate data transfer rate: 7.52 KB/sec 07/16/2003 00:50:53 Objects compressed by: 57% 07/16/2003 00:50:53 Elapsed processing time: 00:20:46 07/16/2003 00:50:53 --- SCHEDULEREC STATUS END 07/16/2003 00:50:53 ANS4034E Error processing '': unknown system error 07/16/2003 00:50:53 --- SCHEDULEREC OBJECT END BACKUP_NT 07/16/2003 00:30:00 07/16/2003 00:50:53 ANS1512E Scheduled event 'BACKUP_NT' failed. Return code = 12. 07/16/2003 00:50:53 Sending results for scheduled event 'BACKUP_NT'. 07/16/2003 00:50:53 Results sent to server for scheduled event 'BACKUP_NT'. Anyone having seen such a strange behavior, or knowing what could be happening ? TIA. Arnaud =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= | Arnaud Brion, Panalpina Management Ltd., IT Group | | Viaduktstrasse 42, P.O. Box, 4002 Basel - Switzerland | | Phone: +41 61 226 19 78 / Fax: +41 61 226 17 01 | =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Re: collocated storage pool issue
Increase the value of Maximum Scratch Volumes Allowed in new storage pool. You can reorganize client data into new collacted storage pool by moving node data. Regards, Zosi Noriega -Original Message- From: Abdulaziz Almuammar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 9:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: collocated storage pool issue Hi guys, I have uncollocated storage pool that stores all the client data in 3494 tape library and I created a new collocated storage pool and redirected all new client data to be stored on it. Each tape in the collocated storage pool is supposed to have one node data (if the pool has empty tapes as I know) but what I foud in the new storage pool is different I found that some of the nodes data are stored in one tape. Could any one tell me if this is normal? and if it is not how can I force each tape to have one client data? I have TSM 5.1.5 on AIX 4.3.3 Regards, Abdulaziz This e-mail may contain confidential and/or priviledged information. If you are not the intended recepient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail.
Re: q drive = status unknown
Thanks Kenny, that did it. Still trying to figure out what caused it. -Original Message- From: Barnes, Kenny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 3:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: q drive = status unknown You might want to check the defined path as well. They have to be defined as on-line there as well. -Original Message- From: Mark Bertrand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 4:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: q drive = status unknown We have two drives that show state unknown when queried with f=d. According to TSM: Unknown The drive begins in drive state unknown as a result of being defined, as a result of server initialization, or as a result of having its status updated to online. We have had to update the status of these two drives to online after some tapes had knocked them offline. The drives are now online but TSM is not using them. Is there a way to change the drive state to empty or ready for operation? Storage Management Server for Windows 2000- Version 5, Release 1, Level 6.3 Thanks, Mark Bertrand -- Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you. --
Re: q drive = status unknown
I was having this problem with IBM Ultrium LTO drives in an IBM 3583 library until I upgraded the firmware for the drives and the library itself. And the RMU for good measure. I didn't find out what the original problem was. Regards, Steve Rivers -Original Message- From: Mark Bertrand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 15 July 2003 22:04 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: q drive = status unknown Thanks Kenny, that did it. Still trying to figure out what caused it. -Original Message- From: Barnes, Kenny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 3:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: q drive = status unknown You might want to check the defined path as well. They have to be defined as on-line there as well. -Original Message- From: Mark Bertrand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 4:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: q drive = status unknown We have two drives that show state unknown when queried with f=d. According to TSM: Unknown The drive begins in drive state unknown as a result of being defined, as a result of server initialization, or as a result of having its status updated to online. We have had to update the status of these two drives to online after some tapes had knocked them offline. The drives are now online but TSM is not using them. Is there a way to change the drive state to empty or ready for operation? Storage Management Server for Windows 2000- Version 5, Release 1, Level 6.3 Thanks, Mark Bertrand -- Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you. --
Re: q drive = status unknown
Mark, We had a similar issue with our W2K Library clients. The way around it is to either reboot the server or use NTUTIL to close the drives. the issue is a scsi reserve has been set on these drives therefore now they are back online they have the reserve still in place which will not allow the drives to be used. Mike Regards, Michael Swinhoe Storage Management Group Zurich Financial Services E-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Stephen Rivers [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] URTON.COMcc: Sent by: ADSM: Dist Subject: Re: q drive = status unknown Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 16/07/2003 09:19 Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager I was having this problem with IBM Ultrium LTO drives in an IBM 3583 library until I upgraded the firmware for the drives and the library itself. And the RMU for good measure. I didn't find out what the original problem was. Regards, Steve Rivers -Original Message- From: Mark Bertrand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 15 July 2003 22:04 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: q drive = status unknown Thanks Kenny, that did it. Still trying to figure out what caused it. -Original Message- From: Barnes, Kenny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 3:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: q drive = status unknown You might want to check the defined path as well. They have to be defined as on-line there as well. -Original Message- From: Mark Bertrand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 4:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: q drive = status unknown We have two drives that show state unknown when queried with f=d. According to TSM: Unknown The drive begins in drive state unknown as a result of being defined, as a result of server initialization, or as a result of having its status updated to online. We have had to update the status of these two drives to online after some tapes had knocked them offline. The drives are now online but TSM is not using them. Is there a way to change the drive state to empty or ready for operation? Storage Management Server for Windows 2000- Version 5, Release 1, Level 6.3 Thanks, Mark Bertrand -- Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you. -- - The information contained in this message is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy or otherwise use it and do not disclose it to anyone else. Please notify the sender of the delivery error and then delete the message from your system. Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author only. Communications will be monitored regularly to improve our service and for security and regulatory purposes. Thank you for your assistance. -
Antwort: Exclude issue
Hi, try exclude.dir *:\documents* Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards Markus Veit An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kopie: Thema: Exclude issue [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received : 16.07.2003 00:21 Bitte antworten an ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [Whoops, retry] Hi *SMers, I just did a q act and saw that TSM (4.2) tried to backup files in the Documents and Settings folder (W2k), even though I have this exclude in my clientoption settings: Option: INCLEXCL Sequence number: 26 Override: No Option Value: exclude.dir *:\documents? Why doesn't this seem to work while other exclude.dir options do work? Is there a problem with the wildcards?? Kind regards, Rick Harderwijk Systems Administrator Factotum Media BV Oosterengweg 44 1212 CN Hilversum P.O. Box 335 1200 AH Hilversum The Netherlands Tel: +31-35-6881166 Fax: +31-35-6881199 E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SV: Tivoli and GWTSA.NLM
Hi Lee I have been asking the same question, and here what's come up: There is no roadmap since we have no plans at this time to implement this. I would recommend that you or any other customers interested in TSM support for Novell GroupWise (or for any new feature, for that matter) open a requirement through their IBM representative or SHARE. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (change eye to i to reply) The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. Good enough is the enemy of excellence. So for the time being, there are a couple of ways to do a backup of GroupWise while it's open: * You could use a Open File Manager (I've used OFM from StBernard - works fine!)... * Or you could use the Stand-by-server product... * or you could wait for NetWare 6.5, which will come with the ability to make a snap-shot mirroring of an volume as a built in feature. ... as a final remark, I can tell you that I have been having contact to a guy named Richard Bliss who have been with GroupWise since the days of WordPerfect... He has gone solo these days, but has promised me to see if he could make a contact between IBM and Novell... The funny thing is, that if IBM was interested they most certain would get the API from Novell (they are especially open for that in the GroupWise division!) - but it seems that IBM don't want to support this feature... to bad, cause it would add some benefit to TSM as a backupproduct! Regards Flemming -Oprindelig meddelelse- Fra: Lee Wilson [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 15. juli 2003 19:27 Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Emne: Tivoli and GWTSA.NLM I was wondering if anyone has any experience with using Tivoli to backup their Group Wise 6.0 system. From what I understand Tivoli does not support the GWTSA.NLM. Are there any plans to include this or has someone devised a work around for this? Thanks in advance for any replies. Lee Wilson CNA Network Server Support Specialist Computing and Network Services Grant MacEwan College Phone(780)497-5591 Cell (780)982-2114 or Fax (780)497-5595 http://www.MacEwan.ca http://www.MacEwan.ca
Restore of a NetWare Cluster... what's happening?
Hi all I've been restoring some data on a NetWare Cluster... and I have had several problems doing this: The TSM Server is a 5.1.6.2 on a AIX 4.3.3. Client software, NetWare 6, SP3 and TSM Client 5.1.6.0. Problem: Every time I tried to start a restore on the cluster, the following happened: - Client went to MediaWait (but no media was mounted) - Client went to Run (still no media mounted) - Client went to Receivewait, and after 600 sec. the server disconnects the server: Logs: On server: ANR0481W Session 49492 for node NODENAME (NetWare)terminated - client did not respond within 300 seconds. On Client: ANS1005E TCP/IP read error on socket = 11, errno = 54, reason : 'Connection reset by peer'. The scary thing is, if I made a restore of a filespace from the SYS: volume (not backed up as a cluster), then it all worked fine!! Solution: Stop all migration and databasebackups - and all works fine!!! What's happening?? is it a designfailure... or is it working as planned? It cannot be true you can't make a restore on a NetWare Cluster, and a migration and/or a databasebackup at the same time. I have tried to reproduce the failure... and everytime I start to migrate or make a databasebackup - the restore fails!! What's happening??? Regards Flemming
Re: Error backuping Certificate Server Database on win2k client
W have a problem here, while trying to backup a win2k system (v 5.00.2195 SP 3) using a TSM client version 5.1.5.15 : the backup consistently finishes with status failed, and following message can be found in dsmerror.log : 07/16/2003 00:50:49 ANS1183E An unknown error occurred while processing system object 'Certificate Server Database': MS API function 'CertSrvBackupRead' failed with error 6 (0x0006) ... I wonder if that system's Certificate Server Database is intact and viable? It's suspicious that CertSrvBackupOpenFile obviously worked but the subsequent CertSrvBackupRead failed, which would indicate a problem with contents. That would be worth checking out. First, though, I would proceed to apply SP 4 to that W2000 system, to fully bring it up to current level, and try the backup again. Richard Sims, BU
Re: Restore of a NetWare Cluster... what's happening?
... On server: ANR0481W Session 49492 for node NODENAME (NetWare)terminated - client did not respond within 300 seconds. ... Sounds like your server COMMTimeout value is unrealistically low for major client operations. Richard Sims, BU
SV: Restore of a NetWare Cluster... what's happening?
Hi Richard Note that the problem only occurs while restoring a NetWare Cluster!!! And in a situation in which there are no processes occuring... the restores works fine... So I don't believe it has anything to do with the COMMTimeout... in that case the problem should be more persistent! Regards Flemming -Oprindelig meddelelse- Fra: Richard Sims [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 16. juli 2003 13:54 Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Emne: Re: Restore of a NetWare Cluster... what's happening? ... On server: ANR0481W Session 49492 for node NODENAME (NetWare)terminated - client did not respond within 300 seconds. ... Sounds like your server COMMTimeout value is unrealistically low for major client operations. Richard Sims, BU
Re: TSM SYSBACK
Yes, you can convert-- they migrate it to the Passport Advantage program (which has it's own section just to migrate folks) and you provide them with the number of processors that you had it running on when it was sold as a services offering, and then they whip up an offer on maintenance of ITSM-System Backup Recovery. This was done for us (MoDOT). I am trying to get to the point where I can play with it-- I've been swamped in other things TSM. good luck! Lawrence Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] WAY.STATE.NY.US To Sent by: ADSM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dist Stor cc Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject .EDU TSM SYSBACK 07/15/2003 03:03 PM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] .EDU TSM V 5 SYSBACK and IBM V 5 SYSBACK In the past year we had to upgrade (pay) to get our SYSBACK licenses to V 5. Since then Tivoli began marketing SYSBACK that integrates with TSM. We were told you can't convert from IBM to Tivoli SYSBACK licenses. Has anyone else had this experience. Our new licenses will be Tivoli SYSBACK and presumable will allow us to do a SYSBACK right to a cartridge based storage pool. For our regular SYSBACKS we back up to disk, then archive the files using Tivoli. Has anyone used the Tivoli SYSBACK?
lan-free tape dismount retention
Hello! I'm working on the TPOC right now and I have the mount retention set to minutes, but as you can see below the volumes is being dismounted seconds after the archive session to the tape drive has completed for the storage agent. Is there a parameter that must be set on the storage agent? Or do I need to change something under the TSM server configuration. Thanks! 07/16/03 08:45:02 ANR0403I Session 421 ended for node PGSU017 (SUN SOLARIS). 07/16/03 08:46:00 ANR8325I (Session: 249, Origin: STORAGENT) Dismounting volume 331ABJ - 1 minute mount retention expired. 07/16/03 08:46:05 ANR8336I (Session: 249, Origin: STORAGENT) Verifying label of LTO volume 331ABJ in drive LTO2_DRIVE-1 (/dev/rmt/2st). 07/16/03 08:47:17 ANR0408I Session 427 started for server STORAGENT (Solaris 2.6/7/8 ) (Tcp/Ip) for library sharing. 07/16/03 08:47:17 ANR8336I Verifying label of LTO volume 331ABJ in drive LTO2_DRIVE-1 (/dev/rmt/3st). 07/16/03 08:47:17 ANR8468I (Session: 249, Origin: STORAGENT) LTO volume 331ABJ dismounted from drive LTO2_DRIVE-1 (/dev/rmt/2st) in library 3584_LTO2. Here is the device class that the data was going to: Device Class Name: DEVCLASS_LTO2 Device Access Strategy: Sequential Storage Pool Count: 1 Device Type: LTO Format: ULTRIUM2 Est/Max Capacity (MB): 409,600.0 Mount Limit: 2 Mount Wait (min): 60 Mount Retention (min): 9,999 Label Prefix: ADSM Library: 3584_LTO2 Directory: Server Name: Retry Period: Retry Interval: Shared: Joni Moyer Systems Programmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] (717)975-8338
RES: lan-free tape dismount retention
Hi Joni, You it restarted the TSM Server after modifying the Mount Retention (min): 9,999? Att, Elenara -Mensagem original- De: Joni Moyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviada em: quarta-feira, 16 de julho de 2003 10:08 Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Assunto: lan-free tape dismount retention Hello! I'm working on the TPOC right now and I have the mount retention set to minutes, but as you can see below the volumes is being dismounted seconds after the archive session to the tape drive has completed for the storage agent. Is there a parameter that must be set on the storage agent? Or do I need to change something under the TSM server configuration. Thanks! 07/16/03 08:45:02 ANR0403I Session 421 ended for node PGSU017 (SUN SOLARIS). 07/16/03 08:46:00 ANR8325I (Session: 249, Origin: STORAGENT) Dismounting volume 331ABJ - 1 minute mount retention expired. 07/16/03 08:46:05 ANR8336I (Session: 249, Origin: STORAGENT) Verifying label of LTO volume 331ABJ in drive LTO2_DRIVE-1 (/dev/rmt/2st). 07/16/03 08:47:17 ANR0408I Session 427 started for server STORAGENT (Solaris 2.6/7/8 ) (Tcp/Ip) for library sharing. 07/16/03 08:47:17 ANR8336I Verifying label of LTO volume 331ABJ in drive LTO2_DRIVE-1 (/dev/rmt/3st). 07/16/03 08:47:17 ANR8468I (Session: 249, Origin: STORAGENT) LTO volume 331ABJ dismounted from drive LTO2_DRIVE-1 (/dev/rmt/2st) in library 3584_LTO2. Here is the device class that the data was going to: Device Class Name: DEVCLASS_LTO2 Device Access Strategy: Sequential Storage Pool Count: 1 Device Type: LTO Format: ULTRIUM2 Est/Max Capacity (MB): 409,600.0 Mount Limit: 2 Mount Wait (min): 60 Mount Retention (min): 9,999 Label Prefix: ADSM Library: 3584_LTO2 Directory: Server Name: Retry Period: Retry Interval: Shared: Joni Moyer Systems Programmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] (717)975-8338
Re: collocated storage pool issue
I also had an issue with collocation before where the tape volumes do not go back to scratch after reclaimation ran. By querying the library volumes it does not say that these tapes contains data but they are still private. Querying the volumes shows that the tapes are empty. They are however not automatically deleted from the pool they belong to. Did anyone else get this? On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 12:05:24 +0400 Zosimo Noriega [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Increase the value of Maximum Scratch Volumes Allowed in new storage pool. You can reorganize client data into new collacted storage pool by moving node data. Regards, Zosi Noriega -Original Message- From: Abdulaziz Almuammar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 9:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: collocated storage pool issue Hi guys, I have uncollocated storage pool that stores all the client data in 3494 tape library and I created a new collocated storage pool and redirected all new client data to be stored on it. Each tape in the collocated storage pool is supposed to have one node data (if the pool has empty tapes as I know) but what I foud in the new storage pool is different I found that some of the nodes data are stored in one tape. Could any one tell me if this is normal? and if it is not how can I force each tape to have one client data? I have TSM 5.1.5 on AIX 4.3.3 Regards, Abdulaziz Jacques Butcher TCM (Technology Corporate Management) Software Engineer Cell: +27 (0)84 676 0329 Tell: +27 (0)11 483-2000 Fax: +27 (0)11 728-3656 Nat. IT Diploma, MCSE, IBM Tivoli Storage Manager 5.1 Certified, NetVault Certified, IPSTor Certified, IBM Certified Specialist - Enterprise Tape Solutions Version 2 == Download ringtones, logos and picture messages at Ananzi Mobile Fun. http://www.ananzi.co.za/cgi-bin/goto.pl?mobile
Re: collocated storage pool issue
Hi, Issue a q vol volumename and see if the output has Scratch Volume?: Yes in it. If this is set to NO the volume remains in the storage pool it was defined to. If it is set to YES, you have to do an audit vol volumename fix=yes. Regard. Karel -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Jacques Butcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: woensdag 16 juli 2003 14:50 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: Re: collocated storage pool issue I also had an issue with collocation before where the tape volumes do not go back to scratch after reclaimation ran. By querying the library volumes it does not say that these tapes contains data but they are still private. Querying the volumes shows that the tapes are empty. They are however not automatically deleted from the pool they belong to. Did anyone else get this? On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 12:05:24 +0400 Zosimo Noriega [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Increase the value of Maximum Scratch Volumes Allowed in new storage pool. You can reorganize client data into new collacted storage pool by moving node data. Regards, Zosi Noriega -Original Message- From: Abdulaziz Almuammar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 9:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: collocated storage pool issue Hi guys, I have uncollocated storage pool that stores all the client data in 3494 tape library and I created a new collocated storage pool and redirected all new client data to be stored on it. Each tape in the collocated storage pool is supposed to have one node data (if the pool has empty tapes as I know) but what I foud in the new storage pool is different I found that some of the nodes data are stored in one tape. Could any one tell me if this is normal? and if it is not how can I force each tape to have one client data? I have TSM 5.1.5 on AIX 4.3.3 Regards, Abdulaziz Jacques Butcher TCM (Technology Corporate Management) Software Engineer Cell: +27 (0)84 676 0329 Tell: +27 (0)11 483-2000 Fax: +27 (0)11 728-3656 Nat. IT Diploma, MCSE, IBM Tivoli Storage Manager 5.1 Certified, NetVault Certified, IPSTor Certified, IBM Certified Specialist - Enterprise Tape Solutions Version 2 == Download ringtones, logos and picture messages at Ananzi Mobile Fun. http://www.ananzi.co.za/cgi-bin/goto.pl?mobile
checkin of volume
Here is a new one. The system had problems mounting volume 000551. -I reset it offsite -took it out of the library ( it said it wasn't present in the lib when i tried doing a checkout) -tried checking it in and got: 07/16/03 09:40:17 ANR8422I CHECKIN LIBVOLUME: Operation for library IBM3494A started as process 118. 07/16/03 09:40:17 ANR8319I 006: Insert volume 000551 R/W into library IBM3494A within 60 minute(s). 07/16/03 09:40:18 ANR8846E Volume 000551 is assigned to a category that does not belong to library IBM3494A. 07/16/03 09:40:18 ANR8426E CHECKIN LIBVOLUME for volume 000551 in library IBM3494A failed. any suggestions?
Re: collocated storage pool issue
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 14:50:08 +0200 Jacques Butcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I also had an issue with collocation before where the tape volumes do not go back to scratch after reclaimation ran. By querying the library volumes it does not say that these tapes contains data but they are still private. Querying the volumes shows that the tapes are empty. They are however not automatically deleted from the pool they belong to. Did anyone else get this? Empty volumes do not go to scratch immedeately, this only happens when a storagepool request a scratch-volume On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 12:05:24 +0400 Zosimo Noriega [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Increase the value of Maximum Scratch Volumes Allowed in new storage pool. You can reorganize client data into new collacted storage pool by moving node data. Regards, Zosi Noriega -Original Message- From: Abdulaziz Almuammar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 9:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: collocated storage pool issue Hi guys, I have uncollocated storage pool that stores all the client data in 3494 tape library and I created a new collocated storage pool and redirected all new client data to be stored on it. Each tape in the collocated storage pool is supposed to have one node data (if the pool has empty tapes as I know) but what I foud in the new storage pool is different I found that some of the nodes data are stored in one tape. Could any one tell me if this is normal? and if it is not how can I force each tape to have one client data? I have TSM 5.1.5 on AIX 4.3.3 Regards, Abdulaziz Jacques Butcher TCM (Technology Corporate Management) Software Engineer Cell: +27 (0)84 676 0329 Tell: +27 (0)11 483-2000 Fax: +27 (0)11 728-3656 Nat. IT Diploma, MCSE, IBM Tivoli Storage Manager 5.1 Certified, NetVault Certified, IPSTor Certified, IBM Certified Specialist - Enterprise Tape Solutions Version 2 == Download ringtones, logos and picture messages at Ananzi Mobile Fun. http://www.ananzi.co.za/cgi-bin/goto.pl?mobile -- Met vriendelijke groeten, Remco Post SARA - Stichting Academisch Rekencentrum Amsterdamhttp://www.sara.nl High Performance Computing Tel. +31 20 592 8008Fax. +31 20 668 3167 I really didn't foresee the Internet. But then, neither did the computer industry. Not that that tells us very much of course - the computer industry didn't even foresee that the century was going to end. -- Douglas Adams
RMAN-06003
Hi, I want to do a restore procedure of a database Oracle 8i runnig over Sun Solaris. I tried to restore this database in other server that have a different file system ( AIX 4.3.3 ) and I had the following message error: RMAN alter database mount; RMAN-03022: compiling command: alter db RMAN-03026: error recovery releasing channel resources RMAN-00571: === RMAN-00569: === ERROR MESSAGE STACK FOLLOWS === RMAN-00571: === RMAN-10039: error encountered while polling for RPC completion on channel default RMAN-10006: error running sql statement: select act from x$ksusex where sid=:1 and serial=:2 RMAN-10002: ORACLE error: ORA-12571: TNS:packet writer failure RMAN-03002: failure during compilation of command RMAN-03013: command type: alter db RMAN-06003: ORACLE error from target database: ORA-03113: end-of-file on communication channel RMAN-06097: text of failing SQL statement: alter database mount RMAN-06099: error occurred in source file: krmk.pc, line: 22028 Somebody knows how can I do this? is it possible? Thanks for your help. Best regards, Josi Antonio Atala Olaechea _ Charla con tus amigos en lmnea mediante MSN Messenger: http://messenger.yupimsn.com/
Open file support
Hi all, a collegue just installed the TSM 5.2 client and required add-ons to be able to properly back-up open files. After some fooling around with the settings, we still got no further than: 07/16/2003 16:30:24 ANS1327E The snapshot operation for 'C:\*' failed. Error code: 673. 07/16/2003 16:30:24 ANS1375E The snapshot operation failed. 07/16/2003 16:30:24 ANS1376E Unable to perform operation using a point-in-time copy of the filesystem. The backup/archive operation will continue without snapshot support. has anybody been successfull in using this feature, and more important, how should it be configured? We read the windows help on configuring open file support, still... -- Met vriendelijke groeten, Remco Post SARA - Stichting Academisch Rekencentrum Amsterdamhttp://www.sara.nl High Performance Computing Tel. +31 20 592 8008Fax. +31 20 668 3167 I really didn't foresee the Internet. But then, neither did the computer industry. Not that that tells us very much of course - the computer industry didn't even foresee that the century was going to end. -- Douglas Adams
Re: collocated storage pool issue
Hi Remco! Actually, an empty volume becomes scratch as soon as the Delay Period For Volume Reuse (part of the storage pool definition) is reached... Kindest regards, Eric van Loon KLM Royal Dutch Airlines -Original Message- From: Remco Post [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 16:19 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: collocated storage pool issue On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 14:50:08 +0200 Jacques Butcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I also had an issue with collocation before where the tape volumes do not go back to scratch after reclaimation ran. By querying the library volumes it does not say that these tapes contains data but they are still private. Querying the volumes shows that the tapes are empty. They are however not automatically deleted from the pool they belong to. Did anyone else get this? Empty volumes do not go to scratch immedeately, this only happens when a storagepool request a scratch-volume On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 12:05:24 +0400 Zosimo Noriega [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Increase the value of Maximum Scratch Volumes Allowed in new storage pool. You can reorganize client data into new collacted storage pool by moving node data. Regards, Zosi Noriega -Original Message- From: Abdulaziz Almuammar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 9:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: collocated storage pool issue Hi guys, I have uncollocated storage pool that stores all the client data in 3494 tape library and I created a new collocated storage pool and redirected all new client data to be stored on it. Each tape in the collocated storage pool is supposed to have one node data (if the pool has empty tapes as I know) but what I foud in the new storage pool is different I found that some of the nodes data are stored in one tape. Could any one tell me if this is normal? and if it is not how can I force each tape to have one client data? I have TSM 5.1.5 on AIX 4.3.3 Regards, Abdulaziz Jacques Butcher TCM (Technology Corporate Management) Software Engineer Cell: +27 (0)84 676 0329 Tell: +27 (0)11 483-2000 Fax: +27 (0)11 728-3656 Nat. IT Diploma, MCSE, IBM Tivoli Storage Manager 5.1 Certified, NetVault Certified, IPSTor Certified, IBM Certified Specialist - Enterprise Tape Solutions Version 2 == Download ringtones, logos and picture messages at Ananzi Mobile Fun. http://www.ananzi.co.za/cgi-bin/goto.pl?mobile -- Met vriendelijke groeten, Remco Post SARA - Stichting Academisch Rekencentrum Amsterdamhttp://www.sara.nl High Performance Computing Tel. +31 20 592 8008Fax. +31 20 668 3167 I really didn't foresee the Internet. But then, neither did the computer industry. Not that that tells us very much of course - the computer industry didn't even foresee that the century was going to end. -- Douglas Adams ** For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. **
Re: collocated storage pool issue
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 16:48:58 +0200 Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Remco! Actually, an empty volume becomes scratch as soon as the Delay Period For Volume Reuse (part of the storage pool definition) is reached... Kindest regards, Eric van Loon KLM Royal Dutch Airlines Hoi Eric, nope, that is when pending volumes become empty :) -Original Message- From: Remco Post [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 16:19 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: collocated storage pool issue On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 14:50:08 +0200 Jacques Butcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I also had an issue with collocation before where the tape volumes do not go back to scratch after reclaimation ran. By querying the library volumes it does not say that these tapes contains data but they are still private. Querying the volumes shows that the tapes are empty. They are however not automatically deleted from the pool they belong to. Did anyone else get this? Empty volumes do not go to scratch immedeately, this only happens when a storagepool request a scratch-volume On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 12:05:24 +0400 Zosimo Noriega [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Increase the value of Maximum Scratch Volumes Allowed in new storage pool. You can reorganize client data into new collacted storage pool by moving node data. Regards, Zosi Noriega -Original Message- From: Abdulaziz Almuammar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 9:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: collocated storage pool issue Hi guys, I have uncollocated storage pool that stores all the client data in 3494 tape library and I created a new collocated storage pool and redirected all new client data to be stored on it. Each tape in the collocated storage pool is supposed to have one node data (if the pool has empty tapes as I know) but what I foud in the new storage pool is different I found that some of the nodes data are stored in one tape. Could any one tell me if this is normal? and if it is not how can I force each tape to have one client data? I have TSM 5.1.5 on AIX 4.3.3 Regards, Abdulaziz Jacques Butcher TCM (Technology Corporate Management) Software Engineer Cell: +27 (0)84 676 0329 Tell: +27 (0)11 483-2000 Fax: +27 (0)11 728-3656 Nat. IT Diploma, MCSE, IBM Tivoli Storage Manager 5.1 Certified, NetVault Certified, IPSTor Certified, IBM Certified Specialist - Enterprise Tape Solutions Version 2 == Download ringtones, logos and picture messages at Ananzi Mobile Fun. http://www.ananzi.co.za/cgi-bin/goto.pl?mobile -- Met vriendelijke groeten, Remco Post SARA - Stichting Academisch Rekencentrum Amsterdamhttp://www.sara.nl High Performance Computing Tel. +31 20 592 8008Fax. +31 20 668 3167 I really didn't foresee the Internet. But then, neither did the computer industry. Not that that tells us very much of course - the computer industry didn't even foresee that the century was going to end. -- Douglas Adams ** For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. ** -- Met vriendelijke groeten, Remco Post SARA - Stichting Academisch Rekencentrum Amsterdamhttp://www.sara.nl High Performance Computing Tel. +31 20 592 8008Fax. +31 20 668 3167 I really didn't foresee the Internet. But then, neither did the computer industry. Not that that tells us very much of course - the computer industry didn't even foresee that the century was going to end. -- Douglas Adams
Re: Exclude issue
The '?' character matches exactly one character. Examples of matches for your *:\documents? pattern: c:\documents1 f:\documents$ Examples that do NOT match: c:\Documents and Settings t:\documents If you are interested in excluding all directories whose names begin with documents, then a better pattern would be: *:\documents* However, if you are truly only interested in excluding C:\Documents and Settings, then you should specify that explicit name: exclude.dir c:\documents and settings (the casing is insignificant) Please see http://msgs.adsm.org/cgi-bin/get/adsm0210/693.html for an example of how to properly code the DEFINE CLIENTOPT command when the pattern contains blank spaces. Hope this helps. Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. Good enough is the enemy of excellence. Rick Harderwijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/15/2003 13:40 Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Exclude issue [Whoops, retry] Hi *SMers, I just did a q act and saw that TSM (4.2) tried to backup files in the Documents and Settings folder (W2k), even though I have this exclude in my clientoption settings: Option: INCLEXCL Sequence number: 26 Override: No Option Value: exclude.dir *:\documents? Why doesn't this seem to work while other exclude.dir options do work? Is there a problem with the wildcards?? Kind regards, Rick Harderwijk Systems Administrator Factotum Media BV Oosterengweg 44 1212 CN Hilversum P.O. Box 335 1200 AH Hilversum The Netherlands Tel: +31-35-6881166 Fax: +31-35-6881199 E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: collocated storage pool issue
Hi Remco! You are right, but aren't empty volumes always in a pending or scratch state? Kindest regards, Eric van Loon KLM Royal Dutch Airlines -Original Message- From: Remco Post [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 16:58 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: collocated storage pool issue On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 16:48:58 +0200 Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Remco! Actually, an empty volume becomes scratch as soon as the Delay Period For Volume Reuse (part of the storage pool definition) is reached... Kindest regards, Eric van Loon KLM Royal Dutch Airlines Hoi Eric, nope, that is when pending volumes become empty :) -Original Message- From: Remco Post [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 16:19 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: collocated storage pool issue On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 14:50:08 +0200 Jacques Butcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I also had an issue with collocation before where the tape volumes do not go back to scratch after reclaimation ran. By querying the library volumes it does not say that these tapes contains data but they are still private. Querying the volumes shows that the tapes are empty. They are however not automatically deleted from the pool they belong to. Did anyone else get this? Empty volumes do not go to scratch immedeately, this only happens when a storagepool request a scratch-volume On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 12:05:24 +0400 Zosimo Noriega [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Increase the value of Maximum Scratch Volumes Allowed in new storage pool. You can reorganize client data into new collacted storage pool by moving node data. Regards, Zosi Noriega -Original Message- From: Abdulaziz Almuammar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 9:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: collocated storage pool issue Hi guys, I have uncollocated storage pool that stores all the client data in 3494 tape library and I created a new collocated storage pool and redirected all new client data to be stored on it. Each tape in the collocated storage pool is supposed to have one node data (if the pool has empty tapes as I know) but what I foud in the new storage pool is different I found that some of the nodes data are stored in one tape. Could any one tell me if this is normal? and if it is not how can I force each tape to have one client data? I have TSM 5.1.5 on AIX 4.3.3 Regards, Abdulaziz Jacques Butcher TCM (Technology Corporate Management) Software Engineer Cell: +27 (0)84 676 0329 Tell: +27 (0)11 483-2000 Fax: +27 (0)11 728-3656 Nat. IT Diploma, MCSE, IBM Tivoli Storage Manager 5.1 Certified, NetVault Certified, IPSTor Certified, IBM Certified Specialist - Enterprise Tape Solutions Version 2 == Download ringtones, logos and picture messages at Ananzi Mobile Fun. http://www.ananzi.co.za/cgi-bin/goto.pl?mobile -- Met vriendelijke groeten, Remco Post SARA - Stichting Academisch Rekencentrum Amsterdamhttp://www.sara.nl High Performance Computing Tel. +31 20 592 8008Fax. +31 20 668 3167 I really didn't foresee the Internet. But then, neither did the computer industry. Not that that tells us very much of course - the computer industry didn't even foresee that the century was going to end. -- Douglas Adams ** For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. ** -- Met vriendelijke groeten, Remco Post SARA - Stichting Academisch Rekencentrum Amsterdamhttp://www.sara.nl High Performance Computing Tel. +31 20 592 8008Fax. +31 20 668 3167 I really didn't foresee the Internet. But then, neither did the computer industry. Not that that tells us very much of course - the computer industry didn't even foresee that the century was going to end. -- Douglas Adams ** For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any
Re: TDP Oracle config question
Steve, Can you answer me this? Does your backup actually fail, or is this just something that shows up during a successful backup? The /adsmorc filespace is a TSM Server filespace and is the default for TDP Oracle and will get created during the backup, if it doesn't already exist. Unless of course, you are specifying something other than the default (the option is TDPO_FS). -- Date:Tue, 15 Jul 2003 13:42:36 -0600 From:Conko, Steven [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: TDP Oracle config question TSM Server: AIX 4.3.3, TSM 5.1.5.4 RMAN Server: AIX4.3.3, TDP 5.2 RMAN Client: AIX 4.3.3, TSM 5.1.5, TDP5.2 The installation guide seems to be a little fuzzy on this topic... At some point during the backup process we get this error in our tdpoerror.log file: 23:28:55 ANS4994S TDP Oracle AIX ANU0599 ANU2602E The object /adsmorc//c-3756527612-20030714-03 was not found on the TSM Server After doing some of my own research I realize its telling me that the /adsmorc file space does not exist. My question is where is is supposed to exist? Am I supposed to create an adsmorc file system or directory on the TSM server, on the TDP/RMAN server, or the client? Is anything ever going to get put there? Does it need to be its own mount point? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance Steve Regards, Neil Rasmussen Software Development TDP for Oracle
Re: TDP Oracle config question
Neil, Im still waiting to find out from the DBA running it if he thinks it is succeeding or failing. Right now we dont have TDPO_FS defined so it is defaulting to adsmorc. My question is: is this only a filespace created within TSM Server storage or does there need to be an actual directory/mount point on a server somewhere? The documents mention including this filespace in the include/exclude list which leads me to believe I need to create the directory somewhere. Is that so? Thanks Steve -Original Message- From: Neil Rasmussen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 11:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TDP Oracle config question Steve, Can you answer me this? Does your backup actually fail, or is this just something that shows up during a successful backup? The /adsmorc filespace is a TSM Server filespace and is the default for TDP Oracle and will get created during the backup, if it doesn't already exist. Unless of course, you are specifying something other than the default (the option is TDPO_FS). -- Date:Tue, 15 Jul 2003 13:42:36 -0600 From:Conko, Steven [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: TDP Oracle config question TSM Server: AIX 4.3.3, TSM 5.1.5.4 RMAN Server: AIX4.3.3, TDP 5.2 RMAN Client: AIX 4.3.3, TSM 5.1.5, TDP5.2 The installation guide seems to be a little fuzzy on this topic... At some point during the backup process we get this error in our tdpoerror.log file: 23:28:55 ANS4994S TDP Oracle AIX ANU0599 ANU2602E The object /adsmorc//c-3756527612-20030714-03 was not found on the TSM Server After doing some of my own research I realize its telling me that the /adsmorc file space does not exist. My question is where is is supposed to exist? Am I supposed to create an adsmorc file system or directory on the TSM server, on the TDP/RMAN server, or the client? Is anything ever going to get put there? Does it need to be its own mount point? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance Steve Regards, Neil Rasmussen Software Development TDP for Oracle
Help Q auditocc or other query
The information in q auditocc tells me a lot but I wonder if there is a way to get the same information and order it by megabytes/gigabytes/terabytes from the heaviest hitter to the least. I would also like to have a column that includes the number of files each of the nodes TSM is tracking. This is something I would like to have for a meeting to explain: 1. What it is costing the company to keep this data on tape. I might also use a moc bill and send it to those people and see their reaction. 2. What kind of a hit the TSM database takes for nodes it has to track millions of files. 3. General reasons to keep our number of versions to what are necessary, not what someone feels like they need. 4. Growth expectations and what it will do to our current setup and for budget considerations next year. I know I am not kept informed of growth expectations by any of these groups yet I'm always expected to keep this thing going for nothing. If anyone has a query that can provide these things could you please share it? You could say I am the worst at sql statements and I would not argue one bit. I'm sure others in the group could also benefit by it. Thanks for the help, And if you can think of something else I might include that would be helpful please feel free. Geoff Gill TSM Administrator NT Systems Support Engineer SAIC E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (858) 826-4062 Pager: (877) 905-7154
Re: Help Q auditocc or other query
select * from auditocc order by total_mb asc ;-) Gill, Geoffrey L. To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GEOFFREY.L.GILL@cc: SAIC.COMSubject: Help Q auditocc or other query Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] .EDU 07/16/2003 11:39 AM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager The information in q auditocc tells me a lot but I wonder if there is a way to get the same information and order it by megabytes/gigabytes/terabytes from the heaviest hitter to the least. I would also like to have a column that includes the number of files each of the nodes TSM is tracking. This is something I would like to have for a meeting to explain: 1. What it is costing the company to keep this data on tape. I might also use a moc bill and send it to those people and see their reaction. 2. What kind of a hit the TSM database takes for nodes it has to track millions of files. 3. General reasons to keep our number of versions to what are necessary, not what someone feels like they need. 4. Growth expectations and what it will do to our current setup and for budget considerations next year. I know I am not kept informed of growth expectations by any of these groups yet I'm always expected to keep this thing going for nothing. If anyone has a query that can provide these things could you please share it? You could say I am the worst at sql statements and I would not argue one bit. I'm sure others in the group could also benefit by it. Thanks for the help, And if you can think of something else I might include that would be helpful please feel free. Geoff Gill TSM Administrator NT Systems Support Engineer SAIC E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (858) 826-4062 Pager: (877) 905-7154
Re: Help Q auditocc or other query
sorry, one of these days I'll learn to read... here is more along the lines of what you are looking for... (not much data here because this is the test serve tsm: TSMSRV08select auditocc.node_name,auditocc.total_mb,sum(occupancy.num_files) as file_cnt from auditocc,occupancy where auditocc.node_name=occupancy.node_name group by auditocc.node_name,auditocc.total_mb order by total_mb desc NODE_NAME TOTAL_MBFILE_CNT -- --- --- TSMSRV01 975 63983 TSMSRV08 71517 TSMUTL01 3 717 tsm: TSMSRV08 Gill, Geoffrey L. To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GEOFFREY.L.GILL@cc: SAIC.COMSubject: Help Q auditocc or other query Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] .EDU 07/16/2003 11:39 AM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager The information in q auditocc tells me a lot but I wonder if there is a way to get the same information and order it by megabytes/gigabytes/terabytes from the heaviest hitter to the least. I would also like to have a column that includes the number of files each of the nodes TSM is tracking. This is something I would like to have for a meeting to explain: 1. What it is costing the company to keep this data on tape. I might also use a moc bill and send it to those people and see their reaction. 2. What kind of a hit the TSM database takes for nodes it has to track millions of files. 3. General reasons to keep our number of versions to what are necessary, not what someone feels like they need. 4. Growth expectations and what it will do to our current setup and for budget considerations next year. I know I am not kept informed of growth expectations by any of these groups yet I'm always expected to keep this thing going for nothing. If anyone has a query that can provide these things could you please share it? You could say I am the worst at sql statements and I would not argue one bit. I'm sure others in the group could also benefit by it. Thanks for the help, And if you can think of something else I might include that would be helpful please feel free. Geoff Gill TSM Administrator NT Systems Support Engineer SAIC E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (858) 826-4062 Pager: (877) 905-7154
? Oracle TDP needs RMAN??
Hello all, I am working with a some Oracle people to define a backup solution. I suggested using the Oracle TDP for doing HOT backups. They said that the TDP does nothing for them because they do NOT use RMAN. They write their own scripts to freeze/release the table spaces and do backups. Does this sound correct? Oracle TDP works directly with RMAN? Thanks Matt
Re: ? Oracle TDP needs RMAN??
Yes, Same reason our DBAs did not want to use it. They didn't want to deal with learning RMAN. SQL-BACKTRACK apparantly generates the RMAN scripts and so we use that. But there, they claim they need full backups because thuer is no difference in size/ length of time between an incrmental and a full. I suspect that is because they have thier dtabase files installed under JFS instead of RAW. I would think Tivoli would follow SQL-BACKTRACKS lead if they wanted people to use thier TDP. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/16/03 02:14PM Hello all, I am working with a some Oracle people to define a backup solution. I suggested using the Oracle TDP for doing HOT backups. They said that the TDP does nothing for them because they do NOT use RMAN. They write their own scripts to freeze/release the table spaces and do backups. Does this sound correct? Oracle TDP works directly with RMAN? Thanks Matt
Re: TDP Oracle config question
You should NOT create a /adsmorc filesystem or mount point. The docs are correct, this is just the filespace name used on the server for this node name. You could change it to something else if you want with the TDPO_FS env variable. The message you are getting tells you that that particular object name does not exist on the server. Do a q filespace blah for the node name you are using and you should see /adsmorc. Is this happening when the RMAN scripts try to delete an object? David B. Longo System Administrator Health First, Inc. 3300 Fiske Blvd. Rockledge, FL 32955-4305 PH 321.434.5536 Pager 321.634.8230 Fax:321.434.5509 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/15/03 03:42PM TSM Server: AIX 4.3.3, TSM 5.1.5.4 RMAN Server: AIX4.3.3, TDP 5.2 RMAN Client: AIX 4.3.3, TSM 5.1.5, TDP5.2 The installation guide seems to be a little fuzzy on this topic... At some point during the backup process we get this error in our tdpoerror.log file: 23:28:55 ANS4994S TDP Oracle AIX ANU0599 ANU2602E The object /adsmorc//c-3756527612-20030714-03 was not found on the TSM Server After doing some of my own research I realize its telling me that the /adsmorc file space does not exist. My question is where is is supposed to exist? Am I supposed to create an adsmorc file system or directory on the TSM server, on the TDP/RMAN server, or the client? Is anything ever going to get put there? Does it need to be its own mount point? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance Steve ## This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary, or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it, and notify the sender. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. Health First reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks. Any views or opinions expressed in this message are solely those of the individual sender, except (1) where the message states such views or opinions are on behalf of a particular entity; and (2) the sender is authorized by the entity to give such views or opinions. ##
Re: collocated storage pool issue
Hi, Eric. Actually, no. An offsite volume will be in Pending, then when reuse delay is up, the volume goes to status=Empty and drm status=vaultretrieve. A volume can also be status=empty from the time it's defined in a stgpool until the time of the first file write commit onto that volume. Alex Paschal Freightliner, LLC (503) 745-6850 phone/vmail -Original Message- From: Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 8:10 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: collocated storage pool issue Hi Remco! You are right, but aren't empty volumes always in a pending or scratch state? Kindest regards, Eric van Loon KLM Royal Dutch Airlines -Original Message- From: Remco Post [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 16:58 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: collocated storage pool issue On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 16:48:58 +0200 Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Remco! Actually, an empty volume becomes scratch as soon as the Delay Period For Volume Reuse (part of the storage pool definition) is reached... Kindest regards, Eric van Loon KLM Royal Dutch Airlines Hoi Eric, nope, that is when pending volumes become empty :)
Re: INACTIVE - ACTIVE FILE VERSION
Elenara, It actually looks like you're selecting from the backups table here. When you do your restore, try displaying active and inactive versions (green diamond button, or view menu). That should show the file. If not, please describe more closely exactly what you do when you attempt the restore, because from your description I'm not certain exactly what you might be experiencing. Alex Paschal Freightliner, LLC (503) 745-6850 phone/vmail -Original Message- From: T_MML [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 12:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: INACTIVE - ACTIVE FILE VERSION Importance: High Hi all, The TSM modified the state of the archive that necessary for restoration, state: inactive_version and does not show to the archives in client TSM. Existe a form to bring these data in return? The data continue in ribbons. NODE_NAME: SERVER1 FILESPACE_NAME: \\SERVER1\c$ FILESPACE_ID: 8 STATE: INACTIVE_VERSION TYPE: FILE HL_NAME: \FOLDER1\MY DOCUMENTS\DOCS\ LL_NAME: TRAINEE (VERSION 1).XLS OBJECT_ID: 39898187 BACKUP_DATE: 2002-11-13 11:07:02.00 DEACTIVATE_DATE: 2003-05-20 08:37:48.00 OWNER: CLASS_NAME: DEFAULT VOLUME_NAME: AA0004L1 NODE_NAME: SERVER1 TYPE: Bkup FILESPACE_NAME: \\SERVER1\c$ FILE_NAME: \FOLDER1\MY DOCUMENTS\DOCS\TRAINEE (VERSION 1).XLS AGGREGATED: 12/16 FILE_SIZE: 1137850 SEGMENT: 1/1 CACHED: No FILESPACE_ID: 7 FILESPACE_HEXNAME: 5c5c67616c62655c7824 FILE_HEXNAME: 5c424b5058505c5445434e4f53554c5c4d415243454c4f205f20434f4e5- 3554c544f525c4d5920444f43554d454e54535c475241564152204e4f2- 04344204f53204152515549564f532044455354412050415354415c434- 420315c20545245494e414d454e544f202856455253494f4e2031292e5- 84c53 King Regards, Elenara Geraldo Senior TSM Administrator MML Systems Phone : 55 41 342 7864 Cellular: 55 41 91035796
RES: INACTIVE - ACTIVE FILE VERSION
Thank you Alex, My problem was solved yesterday by our friend Andrew Raibeck. Att, Elenara -Mensagem original- De: Alex Paschal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviada em: quarta-feira, 16 de julho de 2003 15:46 Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Assunto: Re: INACTIVE - ACTIVE FILE VERSION Elenara, It actually looks like you're selecting from the backups table here. When you do your restore, try displaying active and inactive versions (green diamond button, or view menu). That should show the file. If not, please describe more closely exactly what you do when you attempt the restore, because from your description I'm not certain exactly what you might be experiencing. Alex Paschal Freightliner, LLC (503) 745-6850 phone/vmail -Original Message- From: T_MML [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 12:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: INACTIVE - ACTIVE FILE VERSION Importance: High Hi all, The TSM modified the state of the archive that necessary for restoration, state: inactive_version and does not show to the archives in client TSM. Existe a form to bring these data in return? The data continue in ribbons. NODE_NAME: SERVER1 FILESPACE_NAME: \\SERVER1\c$ FILESPACE_ID: 8 STATE: INACTIVE_VERSION TYPE: FILE HL_NAME: \FOLDER1\MY DOCUMENTS\DOCS\ LL_NAME: TRAINEE (VERSION 1).XLS OBJECT_ID: 39898187 BACKUP_DATE: 2002-11-13 11:07:02.00 DEACTIVATE_DATE: 2003-05-20 08:37:48.00 OWNER: CLASS_NAME: DEFAULT VOLUME_NAME: AA0004L1 NODE_NAME: SERVER1 TYPE: Bkup FILESPACE_NAME: \\SERVER1\c$ FILE_NAME: \FOLDER1\MY DOCUMENTS\DOCS\TRAINEE (VERSION 1).XLS AGGREGATED: 12/16 FILE_SIZE: 1137850 SEGMENT: 1/1 CACHED: No FILESPACE_ID: 7 FILESPACE_HEXNAME: 5c5c67616c62655c7824 FILE_HEXNAME: 5c424b5058505c5445434e4f53554c5c4d415243454c4f205f20434f4e5- 3554c544f525c4d5920444f43554d454e54535c475241564152204e4f2- 04344204f53204152515549564f532044455354412050415354415c434- 420315c20545245494e414d454e544f202856455253494f4e2031292e5- 84c53 King Regards, Elenara Geraldo Senior TSM Administrator MML Systems Phone : 55 41 342 7864 Cellular: 55 41 91035796
backup of volhist and devconfig files
I am currently trying to backup devconfig and volhist to a networked drive under windows Here is the command I use Backup volhist filenames=f:\test\volhist.out Backup devconfig filenames=f:\test\devonfig.out I always get the error ANR2391E BACKUP DEVCONFIG: Server could not write device configuration information to f:\test\devonfig.out. Are we not allowed to backup the volhist and devconfig to a networked drive? TIA Tae
Fw: ? Oracle TDP needs RMAN??
That's correct! It's true that work with RMAN is a little bit hard, but if use LTO2 you will see the advantage of using TDP for Oracle. There's no disk subsystem so fast as LTO2. Those drive units can transfer at 70MB/s compressed. So to utilize the LTO2 drives with it's full capacity you have to multiplex your database backups. And you can only do that through TDP for Oracle. Multiplexing means that you read from several datafiles in parallel and send them in one stream or session to TSM Server. SQL-BackTrack, can't do it. Regards, Anderson - Original Message - From: MC Matt Cooper (2838) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 3:14 PM Subject: ? Oracle TDP needs RMAN?? Hello all, I am working with a some Oracle people to define a backup solution. I suggested using the Oracle TDP for doing HOT backups. They said that the TDP does nothing for them because they do NOT use RMAN. They write their own scripts to freeze/release the table spaces and do backups. Does this sound correct? Oracle TDP works directly with RMAN? Thanks Matt
Re: TDP Oracle config question
Thanks for that bit of information... it definitely clears some things up. According to the docs, we should be using unique TDPO_FS names for each node we are backing up using TDP, correct? After doing the query and some further investigation into the BACKUPS table, it appears we are getting this message because of a missing - When I do a select in the BACKUPS table, the LL_NAME shows up as: c-3756527612-2003-0714-02 However, in the error we are getting, the name of the object is: c-3756527612-20030714-02 Any idea why this is?? Steve -Original Message- From: David Longo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 2:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TDP Oracle config question You should NOT create a /adsmorc filesystem or mount point. The docs are correct, this is just the filespace name used on the server for this node name. You could change it to something else if you want with the TDPO_FS env variable. The message you are getting tells you that that particular object name does not exist on the server. Do a q filespace blah for the node name you are using and you should see /adsmorc. Is this happening when the RMAN scripts try to delete an object? David B. Longo System Administrator Health First, Inc. 3300 Fiske Blvd. Rockledge, FL 32955-4305 PH 321.434.5536 Pager 321.634.8230 Fax:321.434.5509 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/15/03 03:42PM TSM Server: AIX 4.3.3, TSM 5.1.5.4 RMAN Server: AIX4.3.3, TDP 5.2 RMAN Client: AIX 4.3.3, TSM 5.1.5, TDP5.2 The installation guide seems to be a little fuzzy on this topic... At some point during the backup process we get this error in our tdpoerror.log file: 23:28:55 ANS4994S TDP Oracle AIX ANU0599 ANU2602E The object /adsmorc//c-3756527612-20030714-03 was not found on the TSM Server After doing some of my own research I realize its telling me that the /adsmorc file space does not exist. My question is where is is supposed to exist? Am I supposed to create an adsmorc file system or directory on the TSM server, on the TDP/RMAN server, or the client? Is anything ever going to get put there? Does it need to be its own mount point? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance Steve ## This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary, or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it, and notify the sender. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. Health First reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks. Any views or opinions expressed in this message are solely those of the individual sender, except (1) where the message states such views or opinions are on behalf of a particular entity; and (2) the sender is authorized by the entity to give such views or opinions. ##
Re: TDP Oracle config question
No idea about the missing -. I believe the long name is built by Oracle/RMAN and not TSM. So need to look there. I don't know how that is put together, need to get with your DBA or Oracle on that. (I just looked at mine and all my RMAN backups use _ as separators and have different numbering format, but still a long name.) We have unique names for each node with TDPO_FS, it's not really required though, you could use /adsmorc for each one. I think a good naming standard for your environment is best. David Longo [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/16/03 03:13PM Thanks for that bit of information... it definitely clears some things up. According to the docs, we should be using unique TDPO_FS names for each node we are backing up using TDP, correct? After doing the query and some further investigation into the BACKUPS table, it appears we are getting this message because of a missing - When I do a select in the BACKUPS table, the LL_NAME shows up as: c-3756527612-2003-0714-02 However, in the error we are getting, the name of the object is: c-3756527612-20030714-02 Any idea why this is?? Steve -Original Message- From: David Longo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 2:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TDP Oracle config question You should NOT create a /adsmorc filesystem or mount point. The docs are correct, this is just the filespace name used on the server for this node name. You could change it to something else if you want with the TDPO_FS env variable. The message you are getting tells you that that particular object name does not exist on the server. Do a q filespace blah for the node name you are using and you should see /adsmorc. Is this happening when the RMAN scripts try to delete an object? David B. Longo System Administrator Health First, Inc. 3300 Fiske Blvd. Rockledge, FL 32955-4305 PH 321.434.5536 Pager 321.634.8230 Fax:321.434.5509 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/15/03 03:42PM TSM Server: AIX 4.3.3, TSM 5.1.5.4 RMAN Server: AIX4.3.3, TDP 5.2 RMAN Client: AIX 4.3.3, TSM 5.1.5, TDP5.2 The installation guide seems to be a little fuzzy on this topic... At some point during the backup process we get this error in our tdpoerror.log file: 23:28:55 ANS4994S TDP Oracle AIX ANU0599 ANU2602E The object /adsmorc//c-3756527612-20030714-03 was not found on the TSM Server After doing some of my own research I realize its telling me that the /adsmorc file space does not exist. My question is where is is supposed to exist? Am I supposed to create an adsmorc file system or directory on the TSM server, on the TDP/RMAN server, or the client? Is anything ever going to get put there? Does it need to be its own mount point? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance Steve ## This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary, or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it, and notify the sender. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. Health First reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks. Any views or opinions expressed in this message are solely those of the individual sender, except (1) where the message states such views or opinions are on behalf of a particular entity; and (2) the sender is authorized by the entity to give such views or opinions. ## ## This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary, or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it, and notify the sender. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. Health First reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks. Any views or opinions expressed in this message are solely those of the individual sender, except (1) where the message states such views or opinions are on behalf of a particular entity; and (2) the sender is authorized by the entity to give such views or opinions. ##
Re: backup of volhist and devconfig files
Have you checked the access permissions to F: ? Doug Thorneycroft County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County (562) 699-7411 Ext. 1058 FAX (562) 699-6756 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tae Kim Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 11:55 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: backup of volhist and devconfig files I am currently trying to backup devconfig and volhist to a networked drive under windows Here is the command I use Backup volhist filenames=f:\test\volhist.out Backup devconfig filenames=f:\test\devonfig.out I always get the error ANR2391E BACKUP DEVCONFIG: Server could not write device configuration information to f:\test\devonfig.out. Are we not allowed to backup the volhist and devconfig to a networked drive? TIA Tae
Re: TDP Oracle config question
Thanks again. One more quick question... does the filespace name, such as /adsmorc need to be included in the include/exclude list as the docs state? I suppose if so it would be on the TDP client? -Original Message- From: David Longo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 3:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TDP Oracle config question No idea about the missing -. I believe the long name is built by Oracle/RMAN and not TSM. So need to look there. I don't know how that is put together, need to get with your DBA or Oracle on that. (I just looked at mine and all my RMAN backups use _ as separators and have different numbering format, but still a long name.) We have unique names for each node with TDPO_FS, it's not really required though, you could use /adsmorc for each one. I think a good naming standard for your environment is best. David Longo [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/16/03 03:13PM Thanks for that bit of information... it definitely clears some things up. According to the docs, we should be using unique TDPO_FS names for each node we are backing up using TDP, correct? After doing the query and some further investigation into the BACKUPS table, it appears we are getting this message because of a missing - When I do a select in the BACKUPS table, the LL_NAME shows up as: c-3756527612-2003-0714-02 However, in the error we are getting, the name of the object is: c-3756527612-20030714-02 Any idea why this is?? Steve -Original Message- From: David Longo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 2:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TDP Oracle config question You should NOT create a /adsmorc filesystem or mount point. The docs are correct, this is just the filespace name used on the server for this node name. You could change it to something else if you want with the TDPO_FS env variable. The message you are getting tells you that that particular object name does not exist on the server. Do a q filespace blah for the node name you are using and you should see /adsmorc. Is this happening when the RMAN scripts try to delete an object? David B. Longo System Administrator Health First, Inc. 3300 Fiske Blvd. Rockledge, FL 32955-4305 PH 321.434.5536 Pager 321.634.8230 Fax:321.434.5509 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/15/03 03:42PM TSM Server: AIX 4.3.3, TSM 5.1.5.4 RMAN Server: AIX4.3.3, TDP 5.2 RMAN Client: AIX 4.3.3, TSM 5.1.5, TDP5.2 The installation guide seems to be a little fuzzy on this topic... At some point during the backup process we get this error in our tdpoerror.log file: 23:28:55 ANS4994S TDP Oracle AIX ANU0599 ANU2602E The object /adsmorc//c-3756527612-20030714-03 was not found on the TSM Server After doing some of my own research I realize its telling me that the /adsmorc file space does not exist. My question is where is is supposed to exist? Am I supposed to create an adsmorc file system or directory on the TSM server, on the TDP/RMAN server, or the client? Is anything ever going to get put there? Does it need to be its own mount point? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance Steve ## This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary, or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it, and notify the sender. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. Health First reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks. Any views or opinions expressed in this message are solely those of the individual sender, except (1) where the message states such views or opinions are on behalf of a particular entity; and (2) the sender is authorized by the entity to give such views or opinions. ## ## This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary, or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it, and notify the sender. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. Health First reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks. Any views or opinions expressed in this message are solely those of the individual sender, except (1) where the message states such views or opinions are on
Re: lan-free tape dismount retention
in dsmserv.opt of Library Client: SHAREDLIBIDLE YES -Original Message- From: Joni Moyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 9:08 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: lan-free tape dismount retention Hello! I'm working on the TPOC right now and I have the mount retention set to minutes, but as you can see below the volumes is being dismounted seconds after the archive session to the tape drive has completed for the storage agent. Is there a parameter that must be set on the storage agent? Or do I need to change something under the TSM server configuration. Thanks!
Re: TDP Oracle config question
We use it here, well sort of. We have a separate node name for the RMAN backups on each client, that is one node name for B/A on this machine and a separate node name for the RMAN/TDPO client. Therefore we have two stanzas each in dsm.sys and dsm.opt and have separate backup.excl files. For the one for TDPO/RMAN, we have one line: include * oracleclass If you had one backup.excl, then I think you would have: include /adsmorc oracleclass plus whatever other includes/excludes you use. Haven't used it that way as ours was setup with separate files and I continued that format as it works o.k. for us. David Longo [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/16/03 03:47PM Thanks again. One more quick question... does the filespace name, such as /adsmorc need to be included in the include/exclude list as the docs state? I suppose if so it would be on the TDP client? -Original Message- From: David Longo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 3:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TDP Oracle config question No idea about the missing -. I believe the long name is built by Oracle/RMAN and not TSM. So need to look there. I don't know how that is put together, need to get with your DBA or Oracle on that. (I just looked at mine and all my RMAN backups use _ as separators and have different numbering format, but still a long name.) We have unique names for each node with TDPO_FS, it's not really required though, you could use /adsmorc for each one. I think a good naming standard for your environment is best. David Longo [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/16/03 03:13PM Thanks for that bit of information... it definitely clears some things up. According to the docs, we should be using unique TDPO_FS names for each node we are backing up using TDP, correct? After doing the query and some further investigation into the BACKUPS table, it appears we are getting this message because of a missing - When I do a select in the BACKUPS table, the LL_NAME shows up as: c-3756527612-2003-0714-02 However, in the error we are getting, the name of the object is: c-3756527612-20030714-02 Any idea why this is?? Steve -Original Message- From: David Longo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 2:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TDP Oracle config question You should NOT create a /adsmorc filesystem or mount point. The docs are correct, this is just the filespace name used on the server for this node name. You could change it to something else if you want with the TDPO_FS env variable. The message you are getting tells you that that particular object name does not exist on the server. Do a q filespace blah for the node name you are using and you should see /adsmorc. Is this happening when the RMAN scripts try to delete an object? David B. Longo System Administrator Health First, Inc. 3300 Fiske Blvd. Rockledge, FL 32955-4305 PH 321.434.5536 Pager 321.634.8230 Fax:321.434.5509 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/15/03 03:42PM TSM Server: AIX 4.3.3, TSM 5.1.5.4 RMAN Server: AIX4.3.3, TDP 5.2 RMAN Client: AIX 4.3.3, TSM 5.1.5, TDP5.2 The installation guide seems to be a little fuzzy on this topic... At some point during the backup process we get this error in our tdpoerror.log file: 23:28:55 ANS4994S TDP Oracle AIX ANU0599 ANU2602E The object /adsmorc//c-3756527612-20030714-03 was not found on the TSM Server After doing some of my own research I realize its telling me that the /adsmorc file space does not exist. My question is where is is supposed to exist? Am I supposed to create an adsmorc file system or directory on the TSM server, on the TDP/RMAN server, or the client? Is anything ever going to get put there? Does it need to be its own mount point? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance Steve ## This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary, or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it, and notify the sender. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. Health First reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks. Any views or opinions expressed in this message are solely those of the individual sender, except (1) where the message states such views or opinions are on behalf of a particular entity; and (2) the sender is authorized by the entity to give such views or opinions. ## ## This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary,
Version 4.1.0.0 to 5.x. upgrade procedure ?
Hi, I need a little help to upgrade the TSM Server from version 4.1.0.0 to 5.x. So far I installed a test server running a 4.1.0.0 a I am following the steps of Quick Start book (TSM 5.1 for Windows pag. 31) but the DB was not upgraded. What is the exactly procedure ? I´m running W2K. Thanks in advanced Luciano Ariceto Analista de Suporte Técnico (19) 3861 8379 International Paper do Brasil Ltda.
Re: backup of volhist and devconfig files
If I remember correctly the TSM service process, which runs under a service context has no visability to networked drives. This is a Microsoft issue (I've had that problem with other products being run as a service). Drives are networked and visable in a user context. To demonstrate, if you stop TSM and start it in CMD prompt (with the drive mapped), it will see all local mapped drives, and your backup will probably work. This is one example where TSM would be better on Linux :-) ...deon --- Have you looked at the A/NZ Tivoli User Group website? http://www.tuganz.org Deon George, Customer Support Account Engineer, IBM Australia Office: +61 3 9626 6058, Fax: +61 3 9626 6622, Mobile: +61 412 366 816, IVPN +70 66058 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.ibm.com/tivoli ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 17/07/2003 05:30:59 AM: Have you checked the access permissions to F: ? -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tae Kim Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 11:55 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: backup of volhist and devconfig files I am currently trying to backup devconfig and volhist to a networked drive under windows Here is the command I use Backup volhist filenames=f:\test\volhist.out Backup devconfig filenames=f:\test\devonfig.out I always get the error ANR2391E BACKUP DEVCONFIG: Server could not write device configuration information to f:\test\devonfig.out. Are we not allowed to backup the volhist and devconfig to a networked drive? TIA Tae
