tuning mount retension

2005-04-25 Thread Richard Rhodes
I'm trying to tune our mount retension settings on our device classes.
Currently, we have it set to 3 min for our 3590 drives.  I'm not
finding much info on how to tell if our 3 min period is too long or too
short.

1st try . . . .

I sorted the mount messages (anr8337i)in a actlog listing of 24 hours
by volume/date/time and looked for multiple mounts of the same volume that
were  real close together in time and on the same drive.

I found just a couple.

2nd try . . .

I counted the number of the following messages in a actlog listing for 24
hours:
   anr8337i - mounted vol msgs = 415
   anr8325i - dismounting with expired mount retension = 230
   anr8468i - dismounted vol msgs = 415

This might indicate we had 185 instances of mount retension being useful.

But . . .

I'm not sure of is whether  a mount satisfied by a already mounted tape
even has a
mount msg in the log

I'm also not sure whether a tape always waits for the mount retension
period to
be dismounted, or, whether it can be immediately dismounted if there are
pending mount requests for other volumes.

I looked in the manuals and online but didn't find much that helped.

Any thoughts on how to tune mount retension are appreciated

Rick



-
The information contained in this message is intended only for the personal
and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this
message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for
delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you
have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately,
and delete the original message.


FW: TSM 5.3, AES-128 encryption and API/TDP backups

2005-04-25 Thread David McClelland
An update, as I've sorted it for now - it is kinda buried away, but
searching on 'transparent encryption' in the TSM 5.3 API manual reaps
dividends:

http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/tivihelp/index.jsp?topic=/com.i
bm.itsmc.doc/ansa77.htm

I've got this working for TDPSQL on Win32 now (although the only simple
way I could think of verifying it was working was to enable tracing on
traceflags encrypt and encryptdetail and checking for AES128 comms), and
will take a look at the Solaris TDPO as soon as I can.

The storage of the encryption key within the TSM server database (i.e.
not on the client itself as with the 'traditional' TSM encryption) is
interesting, and does make me think about the possibility of managing
offsite TSM DB backups separately (i.e. different physical location)
from our offsite data tapes... At least, that's what I think security
might pick up on when we run this past them...

Rgds,

David McClelland
Reuters
-Original Message-
From: David McClelland 
Sent: 22 April 2005 14:38
To: 'ADSM: Dist Stor Manager'
Subject: TSM 5.3, AES-128 encryption and API/TDP backups

 Hi Guys,

Just a quicky - is anyone out here using the 128-bit AES encryption
capabilities of the 5.3 API to encrypt TDPOracle on Solaris or TDPSQL
backup? I believed this was possible in 5.3, but I'm not having many (or
in fact any) hits in the online docs (or IBM.com or ADSM.org) trying to
find out how to get this working, only how to get the BA client to
encrypt via encryptiontype, include.encrypt etc.

As ever, any help or pointers gratefully received.

Many thanks,

David McClelland
IBM Certified Deployment Professional TSM 5.2 Tivoli Storage Manager
Certified Consultant Infrastructure Backup and Recovery Development
Shared Infrastructure Development Reuters
85 Fleet Street
London EC4P 4AJ


-
Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com

To find out more about Reuters Products and Services visit 
http://www.reuters.com/productinfo 

Any views expressed in this message are those of  the  individual
sender,  except  where  the sender specifically states them to be
the views of Reuters Ltd.


Re: How to find out all drives in NT2000 using command line? Thanks

2005-04-25 Thread Frank Tsao, email is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks, Richards.

It is close but that is not what I am looking for.

I want to find drive letter installed on a NT2000 system.

For example, issue find_drive_of_all_systems will return results as

C:
E:
F:
J:
K:


Frank Tsao
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PAX 25803, 626-302-5803
FAX 626-302-7131



 Richard Sims
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent by: ADSM:To
 Dist Stor ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Manager   cc
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 .EDU Subject
   Re: How to find out all drives in
   NT2000 using command line? Thanks
 04/24/2005 04:27
 AM


 Please respond to
 ADSM: Dist Stor
 Manager
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   .EDU






Frank -

You may find the DevCon utility useful for Windows command line work:

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/q311272/

and  www.robvanderwoude.com/devcon.html

  Richard Sims


Re: How to find out all drives in NT2000 using command line? Thanks

2005-04-25 Thread Andrew Raibeck

Hi Frank,

There is no command that I can think
of that does this; you'd have to write a program or script to do it. Here
are sample script and C++ program (they both do the same thing). If these
are useful, tailor as you wish.

Regards,

Andy


WMI SCRIPT

' ListDrives.vbs
' Invoke by running
'
'  cscript ListDrives.vbs
'
' from an OS command prompt.
strComputer = .

set objWMIService = GetObject(winmgmts:
_
   {impersonationLevel=impersonate}!\\
_
   strComputer 
\root\cimv2)

set disks = objWMIService.ExecQuery
(select * from Win32_LogicalDisk)

for each objDisk in disks
 select case objDisk.DriveType
   case 0
'
I would not normally expect to see this.
Wscript.Echo
objDisk.DeviceID   Unknown
   case 1
Wscript.Echo
objDisk.DeviceID   Invalid root path
   case 2
Wscript.Echo
objDisk.DeviceID   Removable
   case 3
Wscript.Echo
objDisk.DeviceID   Fixed
   case 4
Wscript.Echo
objDisk.DeviceID   Remote
   case 5
Wscript.Echo
objDisk.DeviceID   CD-ROM
   case 6
Wscript.Echo
objDisk.DeviceID   RAM disk
   case Else
'
I would not normally expect to see this.
Wscript.Echo
objDisk.DeviceID   ??
 end select
next




C++ PROGRAM

/*
ListDrive.cpp

Compiled with Visual Studio .Net
2003 from an OS prompt as follows:

 cl /GX /Zi /O1 ListDrives.cpp
/link /debug
*/
#include windows.h
#include cstdio
#include cmath
#include iostream

using namespace std;

int main()
{
 char driveLetter[]
= *:\\;
 DWORD drives  
 = GetLogicalDrives();
 DWORD bit  
   = 0;

 if (!drives)
 {
   cout  ERROR:
GetLogicalDrives() failed with rc 
 
GetLastError()  endl;
   return -1;
 }

 for (int i = 0, bit = 1;
i != 26; i++, bit *= 2)
 {
   if (drives 
bit)
   {
cout
 char('A' + i)  : ;
driveLetter[0]
= 'A' + i;

switch
(GetDriveType(driveLetter))
{
 
case DRIVE_UNKNOWN:
 
 // I would not normally expect to see this.
 
 cout  Unknown;
 
 break;
 
case DRIVE_NO_ROOT_DIR:
 
 cout  Invalid root path;
 
 break;
 
case DRIVE_REMOVABLE:
 
 cout  Removable;
 
 break;
 
case DRIVE_FIXED:
 
 cout  Fixed;
 
 break;
 
case DRIVE_REMOTE:
 
 cout  Remote;
 
 break;
 
case DRIVE_CDROM:
 
 cout  CD-ROM;
 
 break;
 
case DRIVE_RAMDISK:
 
 cout  RAM disk;
 
 break;
 
default:
 
 // I would not normally expect to see this.
 
 cout  ??;
 
 break;
}
 // switch (...)

cout
 endl;
   }  // if
(drives  bit)
 }  // for (...)

 cout  endl;

 return 0;
}


Regards,

Andy

Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The command line is your friend.
Good enough is the enemy of excellence.

ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
wrote on 2005-04-22 14:05:23:

 Frank Tsao
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 PAX 25803, 626-302-5803
 FAX 626-302-7131


ListDrives.cpp
Description: Binary data


Attachment ListDrives.vbs contains a potentially harmful file type extension 
and was removed in accordance with IBM IT content security practices.

Re: tuning mount retension

2005-04-25 Thread asr
== On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 11:08:04 -0400, Richard Rhodes [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:


 I'm trying to tune our mount retension settings on our device classes.
 Currently, we have it set to 3 min for our 3590 drives.  I'm not finding
 much info on how to tell if our 3 min period is too long or too short.


You're probably not going to see behavior problems because of bad mount
retention settings except in relatively extreme cases. But for your questions:


 I'm not sure of is whether a mount satisfied by a already mounted tape even
 has a mount msg in the log

I don't think so.

 I'm also not sure whether a tape always waits for the mount retension period
 to be dismounted, or, whether it can be immediately dismounted if there are
 pending mount requests for other volumes.

Absolutely, yes.


In general, you'd want to increase your mount retention if you find that
you're dismounting and re-mounting the same volume many times in succession,
for no good reason.

Good reasons basically come down to needing that drive mount point for some
other tape.  Dismounting because you need the mountpoint is pretty much
reasonable. :)


You'd want to decrease your mount retention if you find all of:

+ You usually have the wrong thing mounted
+ You usually have had it sitting idle for a long time (locally defined)
+ You are sensitive to the additional mount delay occasioned by a dismount


Or, (as in my case) you're polling your 3494 for tape occupancy on a regular
basis, and you want to have things dismounted if they're not immediately in
use, otherwise your numbers go awry.



- Allen S. Rout


Mount retention, the extreme case.

2005-04-25 Thread asr
I did find a case in which I had difficulty getting a TSM library client to do
e.g. reclamation when I had mount retention set wrong:

If you've got a library client which you've set to have access to two drives,
and mount retention set to some normal value on the library manager (say, 5
minutes)  you can enter a state in which a reclamation process does:

- Mount source volume
- Mount destination volume

[ copy data, finish with dest. ]

- Make mount request for new volume
- Get refused:  too many mount points
- Process fails, TSM admin gets irritated.


What I eventually did was set the library manager to have zero mount
retention, which fixed this.

My drives stay busy, with a line queueing up, most of the day.  So I didn't
mind the more-or-less immediate dismount.



- Allen S. Rout


Documentation help!!

2005-04-25 Thread Lee, Gary D.
Just downloaded the v5.2.2 docs for sun solaris.
However, when I bring them into adobe acrobat 7.0a, I get one word per line.

I am totally blind, and this is how acrobat presents the text to the screen 
reader.
Please, any tivoli folk out there, this makes ift very hard to keep using your 
product.
I normally save the manuals as text, then format appropriately such that it 
makes sense when spoken aloud by the pc; or alternately small sections put into 
braille.

As the subject says, HELP!!

Gary Lee
Senior System Programmer
Ball State University
 

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.10.2 - Release Date: 4/21/2005
 


Re: Documentation help!!

2005-04-25 Thread Andrew Raibeck
Gary, we can look into this, but I would also strongly recommend that open
a PMR so that you can track the problem identification and resolution.

Best regards,

Andy

Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The command line is your friend.
Good enough is the enemy of excellence.



Lee, Gary D. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
2005-04-25 11:32
Please respond to
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager


To
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc

Subject
Documentation help!!






Just downloaded the v5.2.2 docs for sun solaris.
However, when I bring them into adobe acrobat 7.0a, I get one word per
line.

I am totally blind, and this is how acrobat presents the text to the
screen reader.
Please, any tivoli folk out there, this makes ift very hard to keep using
your product.
I normally save the manuals as text, then format appropriately such that
it makes sense when spoken aloud by the pc; or alternately small sections
put into braille.

As the subject says, HELP!!

Gary Lee
Senior System Programmer
Ball State University


--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.10.2 - Release Date: 4/21/2005


Re: Documentation help!!

2005-04-25 Thread Andrew Raibeck
I also forgot to mention... you did not make it clear for which TSM
component (e.g. server, client) you were having difficulty.

Andy

Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The command line is your friend.
Good enough is the enemy of excellence.

ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 2005-04-25
11:32:37:

 Just downloaded the v5.2.2 docs for sun solaris.
 However, when I bring them into adobe acrobat 7.0a, I get one word per
line.

 I am totally blind, and this is how acrobat presents the text to the
 screen reader.
 Please, any tivoli folk out there, this makes ift very hard to keep
 using your product.
 I normally save the manuals as text, then format appropriately such
 that it makes sense when spoken aloud by the pc; or alternately
 small sections put into braille.

 As the subject says, HELP!!

 Gary Lee
 Senior System Programmer
 Ball State University


 --
 No virus found in this outgoing message.
 Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
 Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.10.2 - Release Date: 4/21/2005



Solaris TSM Server 5.2.4.0 and the Query Libvolume command

2005-04-25 Thread Robert R Price
Can someone confirm this before I report it to IBM?

Seems to be a bug in this release of TSM (5.2.4.0) with the command, query
libvol, see below.  A query volume wn3006 shows the tape WN3006 as being
used by the ARCHTAPE storage pool.  A query libvolume wn3006 shows that
it is not in the library.  Yet, when I executed an audit volume, the tape
mounted and read without issue.  If I execute a query libvolume qualstar
WN3006, the tape shows up in the library.  Note the difference is
explicitly stating the library name, qualstar.  The help file indicates
that the default for the library name is all libraries.  This matches how
all TSM Servers worked at earlier levels.  Note also that if one executes
query libvolume (without any parameters) the tape in question DOES shows
up.




tsm: WINDSOR_TSMq v wn3006

Volume Name  Storage Device Estimated
Pct  Volume
 Pool Name   Class Name  Capacity
Util  Status
 (MB)
 --- -- -
- 
WN3006   ARCHTAPEAIT3   118,795.0
100.0 Filling


tsm: WINDSOR_TSMq libv wn3006
ANR2034E QUERY LIBVOLUME: No match found using this criteria. ANS8001I
Return code 11.


tsm: WINDSOR_TSMq libv qualstar wn3006

Library Name Volume Name Status Owner  Last Use
HomeDevice
Element Type
 --- -- -- -
--- --
QUALSTAR WN3006  Private   Data
54


tsm: WINDSOR_TSMhelp q libv
QUERY LIBVOLUME

QUERY LIBVOLUME (Query a Library Volume)

Use this command to display information about one or more volumes that are
checked into an automated library for use by the Tivoli Storage Manager
server.

Privilege Class

Any administrator can issue this command.

Syntax

.-*.  .-*---.
-Query LIBVolume--+--+--+-+--
'-library_name-'  '-volume_name-'



Parameters

library_name
 Specifies the name of the library. You can use wildcard characters to
 specify this name. This parameter is optional. The default is all
 libraries.
volume_name
 Specifies the volume name. You can use wildcard characters to specify
 this name. This parameter is optional. The default is all volumes. ...


tsm: WINDSOR_TSMq libv

Library Name Volume Name Status Owner  Last Use
HomeDevice
Element Type
 --- -- -- -
--- --
QUALSTAR CLN044  Cleaner
3
QUALSTAR CLN077  Cleaner
2
QUALSTAR CLN078  Cleaner
1
QUALSTAR CLN079  Cleaner
0
QUALSTAR WN3006  Private   Data
54
QUALSTAR WN3011  Private   Data
48
QUALSTAR WN3013  Private   Data
121

...


Robert R. Price
ADSM/TSM Administrator
Computer Sciences Corporation
Phone: 412-374-3247
Fax: 412-374-6371
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please
delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in
delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to
bind CSC to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written
agreement or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail
for such purpose.



Re: Solaris TSM Server 5.2.4.0 and the Query Libvolume command

2005-04-25 Thread Andrew Raibeck
I do not think the code should ever have worked in the manner you
described, since the library name and volume name are positional
parameters. Thus QUERY LIBVOLUME WN3006 implies that WN3006 is the library
name, and should always have indicated no match found. I am not aware of
it ever working otherwise.

I'd say that the doc could stand some clarification, to indicate that if
the volume name is specified, then library name is also required.

Regards,

Andy

Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The command line is your friend.
Good enough is the enemy of excellence.

ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 2005-04-25
11:56:26:

 Can someone confirm this before I report it to IBM?

 Seems to be a bug in this release of TSM (5.2.4.0) with the command,
query
 libvol, see below.  A query volume wn3006 shows the tape WN3006 as
being
 used by the ARCHTAPE storage pool.  A query libvolume wn3006 shows
that
 it is not in the library.  Yet, when I executed an audit volume, the
tape
 mounted and read without issue.  If I execute a query libvolume
qualstar
 WN3006, the tape shows up in the library.  Note the difference is
 explicitly stating the library name, qualstar.  The help file indicates
 that the default for the library name is all libraries.  This matches
how
 all TSM Servers worked at earlier levels.  Note also that if one
executes
 query libvolume (without any parameters) the tape in question DOES
shows
 up.





 tsm: WINDSOR_TSMq v wn3006

 Volume Name  Storage Device Estimated
 Pct  Volume
  Pool Name   Class Name  Capacity
 Util  Status
  (MB)
  --- -- -
 - 
 WN3006   ARCHTAPEAIT3   118,795.0
 100.0 Filling



 tsm: WINDSOR_TSMq libv wn3006
 ANR2034E QUERY LIBVOLUME: No match found using this criteria. ANS8001I
 Return code 11.



 tsm: WINDSOR_TSMq libv qualstar wn3006

 Library Name Volume Name Status Owner  Last Use
 HomeDevice
 Element Type
  --- -- -- -
 --- --
 QUALSTAR WN3006  Private   Data
 54



 tsm: WINDSOR_TSMhelp q libv
 QUERY LIBVOLUME

 QUERY LIBVOLUME (Query a Library Volume)

 Use this command to display information about one or more volumes that
are
 checked into an automated library for use by the Tivoli Storage Manager
 server.

 Privilege Class

 Any administrator can issue this command.

 Syntax

 .-*.  .-*---.
 -Query LIBVolume--+--+--+-+--
 '-library_name-'  '-volume_name-'



 Parameters

 library_name
  Specifies the name of the library. You can use wildcard characters
to
  specify this name. This parameter is optional. The default is all
  libraries.
 volume_name
  Specifies the volume name. You can use wildcard characters to
specify
  this name. This parameter is optional. The default is all volumes.
...



 tsm: WINDSOR_TSMq libv

 Library Name Volume Name Status Owner  Last Use
 HomeDevice
 Element Type
  --- -- -- -
 --- --
 QUALSTAR CLN044  Cleaner
 3
 QUALSTAR CLN077  Cleaner
 2
 QUALSTAR CLN078  Cleaner
 1
 QUALSTAR CLN079  Cleaner
 0
 QUALSTAR WN3006  Private   Data
 54
 QUALSTAR WN3011  Private   Data
 48
 QUALSTAR WN3013  Private   Data
 121

 ...


 Robert R. Price
 ADSM/TSM Administrator
 Computer Sciences Corporation
 Phone: 412-374-3247
 Fax: 412-374-6371
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]





 This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please
 delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in
 delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to
 bind CSC to any order or other contract unless 

Tape Drive Confusion

2005-04-25 Thread Meadows, Andrew
Configuration:
TSM V 5.2
OS = Aix 5.1
3584 Library (latest Firmware)
2 Fibre Switches (4 LTO GEN 1 Drives Each)
8 LTO GEN 1 Drives
2 Fibre Cards
Switch 1 (Drives 1234)
Switch 2 (Drives 5678)

I just recently Added 2 new LTO Tape Drives to my 3584 Library. In doing
this I had to add a new switch and decided to split the load on the
switches to help throughput. In doing this I had to delay my backup
stgpool jobs so that is currently running. In order to catch up on time
I thought why not use the new drives. 
I Issued the command backup stg (Onsite Tape Pool) (Offsite Tape Pool)
maxpr=3. 

Now the backup is running really slow if the process has tapes mounted
on switch 1 and 2. If they are on the same switch they run fine. 
Am I missing some type of configuration here or something? 
Please assist as I was sold this as being a faster solution and then
sold it to my Sup's as a faster solution.
If more info is needed please let me know.
Thanks in Advance,
Andrew

This message is intended only for the use of the Addressee and
may contain information that is PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL.

If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited.

If you have received this communication in error, please erase
all copies of the message and its attachments and notify us
immediately.

Thank you.



Re: Documentation help!!

2005-04-25 Thread Andrew Raibeck
Also, which screen reader are you using?

Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The command line is your friend.
Good enough is the enemy of excellence.

ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 2005-04-25
11:36:19:

 I also forgot to mention... you did not make it clear for which TSM
 component (e.g. server, client) you were having difficulty.

 Andy

 Andy Raibeck
 IBM Software Group
 Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
 Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
 The command line is your friend.
 Good enough is the enemy of excellence.

 ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 2005-04-25
 11:32:37:

  Just downloaded the v5.2.2 docs for sun solaris.
  However, when I bring them into adobe acrobat 7.0a, I get one word per
 line.
 
  I am totally blind, and this is how acrobat presents the text to the
  screen reader.
  Please, any tivoli folk out there, this makes ift very hard to keep
  using your product.
  I normally save the manuals as text, then format appropriately such
  that it makes sense when spoken aloud by the pc; or alternately
  small sections put into braille.
 
  As the subject says, HELP!!
 
  Gary Lee
  Senior System Programmer
  Ball State University
 
 
  --
  No virus found in this outgoing message.
  Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
  Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.10.2 - Release Date: 4/21/2005
 


TSM causing client disk contention

2005-04-25 Thread Paul Zarnowski
We have a couple of clients here (Sun, Windows) who have noticed dramatic
slowdowns on their application servers when TSM incremental backups
run.  Has anyone developed mechanisms to address this? TIA
..Paul
--
Paul Zarnowski Ph: 607-255-4757
719 Rhodes Hall, Cornell UniversityFx: 607-255-8521
Ithaca, NY 14853-3801  Em: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: TSM causing client disk contention

2005-04-25 Thread Stapleton, Mark
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
Behalf Of Paul Zarnowski
We have a couple of clients here (Sun, Windows) who have 
noticed dramatic
slowdowns on their application servers when TSM incremental backups
run.  Has anyone developed mechanisms to address this? TIA

Two possibilities:

1. Time your backups so that they don't run concurrently with peak app
times.
2. Increase RAM and processor power.

--
Mark Stapleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
IBM Certified Advanced Deployment Professional
Tivoli Storage Management Solutions 2005
Office 262.521.5627  


Exchange 2003 restore to another server. HELP!

2005-04-25 Thread Coats, Jack
I am using the TDP for Exchange GUI, and restoring to a similar leveled
version of Exchange on the same base OS.
I get the following manual from the client:

04/25/2005 17:57:03 ACN5798E MS Exchange API HRESERESTOREADDDATABASE()
failed with HRESULT: 0xc7fe1f42 - Database not found. 04/25/2005
17:57:03 Total backups inspected:   1

From the error logs on the Exchange server, I get the impression that I
am not restoring to the correct Exchange database.

How can I restore one exchange server (or portions) to another server?

If my answer is RTFM, that is OK, please let me know which Fine Manual
to read and where! 

... TIA Jack


Re: TSM causing client disk contention

2005-04-25 Thread Coats, Jack
Paul,

Yes, We've noticed this.  

Our solutions: 
* Start backups when users have supposedly gone home.  
* Don't do 'hot backups'.  Have the application export its own backup to
a flat file (preferably on another file system), then backup up the flat
file.
* Just backup what you MUST daily, then do another schedule to pick up
the 'other stuff' on weekends. (Like, pick up user home directories and
data directories daily, backup the OS and software weekly, since I
changes little.  This keeps down the time to query the database about
whether or not something has been backed up.
* Use journaling locally (we have issues with it, but when it works it
helps)
 
These hints don't make all problems disappear, but they help.

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Paul Zarnowski
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2005 3:37 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: TSM causing client disk contention

We have a couple of clients here (Sun, Windows) who have noticed
dramatic
slowdowns on their application servers when TSM incremental backups
run.  Has anyone developed mechanisms to address this? TIA