Re: AW: [ADSM-L] Migration Speed Has Plummeted
FYI, per the TSM manual, raw filesystems should *not* be used in a file-based disk pool. At this time, file-based disk pools are the way to go with SATA disks (performance-wise). -- Mark Stapleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) IBM Certified Advanced Deployment Professional Tivoli Storage Management Solutions 2005 IBM Certified Advanced Technical Expert (CATE) AIX Office 262.521.5627 >-Original Message- >From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >Behalf Of Leigh Reed >Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 5:16 PM >To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU >Subject: Re: AW: [ADSM-L] Migration Speed Has Plummeted > >Joni, > >If you read Ben Bullock's recent posting, I agree with >everything he has >said. I would definitely use raw disk volumes (in a Unix world). > > >Leigh > >-Original Message- >From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >Behalf Of >Joni Moyer >Sent: 17 August 2005 20:31 >To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU >Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] AW: [ADSM-L] Migration Speed Has Plummeted > >Hi Leigh, > >I have just added EMC fibre channel disk from a CX700 in the following >pieces of physical disk under the filesystem /tsmdev/stgpool1 > >CHRS044 /tsmdev/stgpool1 > >lun 175 100 GB >lun 178 100 GB >lun 181 100 GB >lun 184 100 GB >lun 187 100 GB >lun 190 100 GB >lun 193 100 GB >lun 199 100 GB >lun 204 100 GB >lun 210 100 GB > >Total 1000 GB > >When you stated using many small TSM disk storage pool volumes, would >anyone happen to know what a good, acceptable size TSM volume would be? >Thanks! > > >Joni Moyer >Highmark >Storage Systems >Work:(717)302-6603 >Fax:(717)302-5974 >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > "Leigh Reed" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >To > Sent by: "ADSM: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Dist Stor >cc > Manager" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject > .EDU> Re: AW: [ADSM-L] Migration Speed > Has Plummeted > > 08/17/2005 10:39 > AM > > > Please respond to > "ADSM: Dist Stor > Manager" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > .EDU> > > > > > > >Joni > >The following URL is to the TSM V5.3 Technical Guide Redbook. > >If you go to section 3.4.6, it discusses some changes in TSM 5.3 that >lend themselves to 'disk only backups' >Obviously, if you're not at 5.3 yet, then they may not be of >use to you. > >I personally would consider SATA disk as a possible replacement to >sequential tape, but I would still use good quality fast disk as >traditional 'random' disk pool to stage the nightly backups. I think >that it is widely recognised that significantly 'slicing up' the >diskpool into a large number of smallish volumes, greatly improves >performance (certainly on the backup). I believe that this is >because of >the 'multi-threaded' nature of TSM. > >I would imagine that the config for the best performance of >SATA disk as >random TSM backuppool, would be to configure each SATA disk as a single >TSM volume within the backuppool and ensure that you have enough SATA >disks/backuppool volumes as you have sessions in at the same time. > >However, with SATA disk capacity increasing rapidly, it's not efficient >to have a 100 x 250GB SATA disks (100 TSM volumes) sitting in your >backuppool, that only ever get 10% utilised. > >I must state that this is just my opinion, I have no direct experience >with SATA disks. > >Leigh >
Re: MS SQL partial log restore with TDP
Kyle,
Once you choose to run recovery ("Recovery" checkbox on GUI,
"/RECOVERY=YES" on CLI)... the SQL Server will no longer be able
to apply more logs to the database. You will need to run the
entire restore and recovery over again if you want to bring
the database back to a different point in time.
Thanks,
Del
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 08/18/2005
07:32:03 PM:
> Recently a customer of mine pointed out the fact that you could use
> the TDP for SQL to restore to a point in time which means replaying
> part but not all of a log. I actually didn't know you could do
> this. For all of the DR tests I've been involved with we've wanted
> to get all the data in the logs.
>
> Finding out they could do this brought up the following question. If
> you first choose to reply to a certain point in time say today at
> 15:00 and then after the restore you find that you really needed to
> replay the logs up to 16:00 can you go back in through the TDP or by
> any other means and choose to reply another hour of the log? Or, do
> you have to perform the entire restore over again stating this time
> with a point in time of 16:00.
>
> Del?, Anyone?
>
> Kyle
MS SQL partial log restore with TDP
Recently a customer of mine pointed out the fact that you could use the TDP for SQL to restore to a point in time which means replaying part but not all of a log. I actually didn't know you could do this. For all of the DR tests I've been involved with we've wanted to get all the data in the logs. Finding out they could do this brought up the following question. If you first choose to reply to a certain point in time say today at 15:00 and then after the restore you find that you really needed to replay the logs up to 16:00 can you go back in through the TDP or by any other means and choose to reply another hour of the log? Or, do you have to perform the entire restore over again stating this time with a point in time of 16:00. Del?, Anyone? Kyle - Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
Re: Destroyed Tape
Hi Laura, It is more helpful when making technical inquiries to include all the specific information about your problem, including the full text of the message you are receiving. :-) In this case, I am guessing that you are receiving message ANR1425W. If so, the information for this message that already is supplied with TSM should be of help. From the Admin command line interface, you can issue this command: HELP Where is the message you are receiving. More specifically: HELP ANR1425W That will give you further information about this message, including: message text, message explanation, system action, and user response. The "user response" part often contains suggestions for how to proceed. In the case of ANR1425W, it does give specific commands you can try. See if that helps. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. "Good enough" is the enemy of excellence. "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 2005-08-18 08:30:38: > Hi All! > > I have a tape marked "Destroyed" but can'not delete it because it is > "mountablenotinlib". The tape is > > long gone, but I would like to delete it. > > Many Thanks, > > Laura
Re: Destroyed Tape
I'm assuming this is a copypool tape as it is "mountablenotinlib"? If so does a q vol show the tape as empty? If the tape shows empty, then update the vol to readwrite and it will automagically disappear. If the tape shows full/filling, you should do a "delete vol discardd=yes" and then change it to readwrite. Ben -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Laura Lantz Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 9:31 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Destroyed Tape Hi All! I have a tape marked "Destroyed" but can'not delete it because it is "mountablenotinlib". The tape is long gone, but I would like to delete it. Many Thanks, Laura
Re: Solution to RE: Error starting TSM server after upgrade
It was me that expressed an interest in the answer. However if the answer is to audit the DB, it's not going to work for me. I'm not sure how long it will take to audit a 100GB DB, but we are a 24x7 manufacturing site, so downtimes on the TSM server typically have to be kept to less than a couple hours or it starts to impact production (i.e. Oracle DB archlog space fill up because it can't push to TSM and the Oracle server screeches to a halt. Large archive areas are not cleaned up by TSM and their processing stop, etc). Ya, ya, putting the backup solution in a situation where it could bring down production is a bad idea, but what can you do when you are generating about 14TB of data a day to be backed up/archived? Nobody wants to have to buy a new SAN/NAS/DAS every month to keep it all on-line, so we make the TSM server clean up the data (archive & delete) and keep it around. Just as a note, here is the command I use to see how much data has flowed through the TSM server in the last 24 hours. I likely gleaned it off this listsrv, so I ~believe~ it's correct. select cast((cast(sum(summary.bytes) as float) / 1024 / 1024 /1024) as decimal(10,2)) as Gigabytes from summary where start_time >current_timestamp - 1 day Anyways, as I mentioned, that error is only seen on the startup of the TSM server and doesn't seem to cause errors, but if I ever get a window to do an auditdb, I will keep this in mind. Thanks, Ben From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shannon Bach Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 9:01 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Solution to RE: Error starting TSM server after upgrade Yesterday I posted to the list about an error message that was generating when our TSM Server came back on-line after an upgrade to 5.2.2. Those error messages were causing other error messages during the Expiration process and seemed to be slowing down the Expiration process (my hope is that getting rid of these errors will solve the slow-down problem of the Expiration process...I won't be sure however until I get rid of the messages :~) We opened an ETR with IBM yesterday afternoon and there was already a response when I came in this morning. Someone expressed interest in the solution if we found one so I will post an edited version of IBM's response. Because our TSM Server is on an MVS/ZOS mainframe, some things are done differently than other platforms but the gist of it is the same. The error messages are the result of a corrupt entry in the TSM Server database. The ANRD's callchain indicates that the TSM server's migration thread is working to try and calculate space in the tapepool to run a disk to tape migration. In that process, the TSM server must access the AF.Custers table. It is in this table that there is an orphaned entry causing the error messages to be logged in the activity log. To fix the problem, you will have to remove the orphaned entry. The way to do this is with audit of the TSM server's database. This is an off-line process, during which the TSM server is down. In short run an AUDITDB ARCHSTORAGE FIX=NO Once the process is complete, restart the server normally. I'm scheduling time to do this today, I have a regularly scheduled Expiration process done on Fridays... before each weekend. I will post the results on the list and if it really was affecting the Expiration process time. As always, Thank You Shannon Madison Gas & Electric Co Operations Analyst -Data Center Services Information Management Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Solution to RE: Error starting TSM server after upgrade
We've been waiting for a reply as I too questioned this :~) Shannon Andrew Raibeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 08/18/2005 10:16 AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc: Subject: Re: Solution to RE: Error starting TSM server after upgrade Hmmm... I have to question the FIX=NO part, as that will only search for inconsistencies; it won't fix them. You should clarify with the engineer who answered your question, as there might be a typo. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. "Good enough" is the enemy of excellence. "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 2005-08-18 08:01:22: > > Yesterday I posted to the list about an error message that was > generating when our TSM Server came back on-line after an upgrade to > 5.2.2. Those error messages were causing other error messages > during the Expiration process and seemed to be slowing down the > Expiration process (my hope is that getting rid of these errors will > solve the slow-down problem of the Expiration process...I won't be > sure however until I get rid of the messages :~) > We opened an ETR with IBM yesterday afternoon and there was > already a response when I came in this morning. Someone expressed > interest in the solution if we found one so I will post an edited > version of IBM's response. Because our TSM Server is on an MVS/ZOS > mainframe, some things are done differently than other platforms but > the gist of it is the same. > > The error messages are the result of a corrupt entry in the TSM > Server database. The ANRD's callchain indicates that the TSM > server's migration thread is working to try and calculate space in > the tapepool to run a disk to tape migration. In that process, the > TSM server must access the AF.Custers table. It is in this table > that there is an orphaned entry causing the error messages to be > logged in the activity log. > > To fix the problem, you will have to remove the orphaned entry. The > way to do this is with audit of the TSM server's database. This is > an off-line process, during which the TSM server is down. > > In short run an > > AUDITDB ARCHSTORAGE FIX=NO > > Once the process is complete, restart the server normally. > > I'm scheduling time to do this today, I have a regularly scheduled > Expiration process done on Fridays? before each weekend. I will > post the results on the list?. and if it really was affecting the > Expiration process time. > > As always, > Thank You > Shannon > > > > > > > Madison Gas & Electric Co > Operations Analyst -Data Center Services > Information Management Systems > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Destroyed Tape
Hi All! I have a tape marked "Destroyed" but can'not delete it because it is "mountablenotinlib". The tape is long gone, but I would like to delete it. Many Thanks, Laura
[no subject]
Matthew, The "Platform" is set to whatever client-type connected last using that NODENAME. In this case, it was probably the BA client scheduler, this "WinNT". Thanks, Del "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 08/18/2005 11:05:25 AM: > Hi SMers, > > Perhaps I'm being a little silly, but I cannot understand these filespaces > and platforms results. > > > tsm: TSML003A>q fi not* > > Node Name Filespace FSIDPlatformFilespace >Name Type > > ------- > NOTL001M COMail1.DO- 1TDP Dom-API:Domi- > MDBS ino noData > NOTL001M COMail1.DO- 2TDP Dom-API:Domi- > MLOGS ino noData > NOTL001M_INFRA \\notl001m- 1WinNT NTFS > \c$ > NOTL001M_MONTH-COMail1.DO- 1WinNT API:Domi- > LY MDBS noData > NOTL002M COMail2.DO- 1TDP Dom-API:Domi- > MDBS ino noData > NOTL002M COMail2.DO- 2TDP Dom-API:Domi- > MLOGS ino noData > NOTL002M_INFRA \\notl002m- 1WinNT NTFS > > > I can appreciate that the API filespaces are sent data by the TDP > platform, but the one server NOTL001M_MONTHLY seems to have a platform of > WinNT and I cannot for the life of me figure out why. > Can anyone shed any light on this? perhaps I'm just looking through the > wrong lens.
Re: Solution to RE: Error starting TSM server after upgrade
Hmmm... I have to question the FIX=NO part, as that will only search for inconsistencies; it won't fix them. You should clarify with the engineer who answered your question, as there might be a typo. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. "Good enough" is the enemy of excellence. "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 2005-08-18 08:01:22: > > Yesterday I posted to the list about an error message that was > generating when our TSM Server came back on-line after an upgrade to > 5.2.2. Those error messages were causing other error messages > during the Expiration process and seemed to be slowing down the > Expiration process (my hope is that getting rid of these errors will > solve the slow-down problem of the Expiration process...I won't be > sure however until I get rid of the messages :~) > We opened an ETR with IBM yesterday afternoon and there was > already a response when I came in this morning. Someone expressed > interest in the solution if we found one so I will post an edited > version of IBM's response. Because our TSM Server is on an MVS/ZOS > mainframe, some things are done differently than other platforms but > the gist of it is the same. > > The error messages are the result of a corrupt entry in the TSM > Server database. The ANRD's callchain indicates that the TSM > server's migration thread is working to try and calculate space in > the tapepool to run a disk to tape migration. In that process, the > TSM server must access the AF.Custers table. It is in this table > that there is an orphaned entry causing the error messages to be > logged in the activity log. > > To fix the problem, you will have to remove the orphaned entry. The > way to do this is with audit of the TSM server's database. This is > an off-line process, during which the TSM server is down. > > In short run an > > AUDITDB ARCHSTORAGE FIX=NO > > Once the process is complete, restart the server normally. > > I'm scheduling time to do this today, I have a regularly scheduled > Expiration process done on Fridays? before each weekend. I will > post the results on the list?. and if it really was affecting the > Expiration process time. > > As always, > Thank You > Shannon > > > > > > > Madison Gas & Electric Co > Operations Analyst -Data Center Services > Information Management Systems > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[no subject]
Hi SMers, Perhaps I'm being a little silly, but I cannot understand these filespaces and platforms results. tsm: TSML003A>q fi not* Node Name Filespace FSIDPlatformFilespace Name Type ------- NOTL001M COMail1.DO- 1TDP Dom-API:Domi- MDBS ino noData NOTL001M COMail1.DO- 2TDP Dom-API:Domi- MLOGS ino noData NOTL001M_INFRA \\notl001m- 1WinNT NTFS \c$ NOTL001M_MONTH-COMail1.DO- 1WinNT API:Domi- LY MDBS noData NOTL002M COMail2.DO- 1TDP Dom-API:Domi- MDBS ino noData NOTL002M COMail2.DO- 2TDP Dom-API:Domi- MLOGS ino noData NOTL002M_INFRA \\notl002m- 1WinNT NTFS I can appreciate that the API filespaces are sent data by the TDP platform, but the one server NOTL001M_MONTHLY seems to have a platform of WinNT and I cannot for the life of me figure out why. Can anyone shed any light on this? perhaps I'm just looking through the wrong lens. Thanks, Regards, Matthew Aviva plc Registered Office: St. Helen's, 1 Undershaft, London EC3P 3DQ Registered in England Number 02468686 www.aviva.com This message and any attachments are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please telephone or e-mail the sender and delete this message and any attachment from your system. Also, if you are not the intended recipient you must not copy this message or attachment or disclose the contents to any other person.
Solution to RE: Error starting TSM server after upgrade
Yesterday I posted to the list about an error message that was generating when our TSM Server came back on-line after an upgrade to 5.2.2. Those error messages were causing other error messages during the Expiration process and seemed to be slowing down the Expiration process (my hope is that getting rid of these errors will solve the slow-down problem of the Expiration process...I won't be sure however until I get rid of the messages :~) We opened an ETR with IBM yesterday afternoon and there was already a response when I came in this morning. Someone expressed interest in the solution if we found one so I will post an edited version of IBM's response. Because our TSM Server is on an MVS/ZOS mainframe, some things are done differently than other platforms but the gist of it is the same. The error messages are the result of a corrupt entry in the TSM Server database. The ANRD's callchain indicates that the TSM server's migration thread is working to try and calculate space in the tapepool to run a disk to tape migration. In that process, the TSM server must access the AF.Custers table. It is in this table that there is an orphaned entry causing the error messages to be logged in the activity log. To fix the problem, you will have to remove the orphaned entry. The way to do this is with audit of the TSM server's database. This is an off-line process, during which the TSM server is down. In short run an AUDITDB ARCHSTORAGE FIX=NO Once the process is complete, restart the server normally. I'm scheduling time to do this today, I have a regularly scheduled Expiration process done on Fridays… before each weekend. I will post the results on the list…. and if it really was affecting the Expiration process time. As always, Thank You Shannon Madison Gas & Electric Co Operations Analyst -Data Center Services Information Management Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problems with BMR on W2K (missing DLL's after restore)
The restore should work. Make sure you are following the procedures outlined in article http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21164812 I also recommend bringing your client maintenance up the the most current 5.2 or 5.3 levels. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. "Good enough" is the enemy of excellence. "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 2005-08-18 02:54:56: > Hello, > > We did some testing the last days, because we were afraid that our current > DR-procedure didn't work anymore on W2K-servers were IIS is running. > > Restore with TSM 5.2.2.0 client, without first restoring Catroot: > OK, but WFP restores a lot of old protected files > > Restore with TSM 5.2.2.0 client, first restoring Catroot: > OK, but WFP restores only inseng.dll and mshtml.dll (just 2 old files) > > Restore with TSM 5.3.0.15 client, without first restoring Catroot: > OK, but WFP restores still 66 old protected files > > Restore with TSM 5.3.0.15 client, first restoring Catroot: > OK, but WFP restore only inseng.dll > > Conclusion: we are now investigating what the impact is of the restored > dll's on the operating system. > > We are going to add the restore of the Catroot in our DR-procedure, but > without the Catroot it is still working. > > It's only a problem with the 5.2 client on W2K-systems with IIS and > Exchange. Systems with only IIS and 5.2 clients we have no problems. > > Regards, > > Mike > > _ > Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! > http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
ISC question
hi all, can someone tell me which applications can be installed on ISC except admin center ? does DS4100 console can also be installed on ISC as part of it ? thanks
Re: How to delete copystg data for a single node?
On Aug 18, 2005, at 8:51 AM, Barnes, Kenny wrote: Wouldn't "Del vol discard=yes" delete all data for all nodes found on the volume? Would work if you were using collocation. Quite so. Here are my notes on an approach, culled from prior postings: Copy Storage Pool, delete node data You cannot directly delete a node's data from a copy storage pool; but you can circuitously effect it by using MOVe NODEdata to shift the node's data to separate tapes in the copy stgpool (temporarily changing the stgpool to COLlocate=Yes), and then doing DELete Volume on the newly written volumes. Richard Sims
Re: How to delete copystg data for a single node?
move the data and colocate it to one volume or to one place where you can delete it without deleteing any other information. Kær kveðja / Best regards, Pétur Eyþórsson · Tæknilegur ráðgjafi eServer & Storage · Tivoli Advanced Storage Solutons Techical Expert · MCSE · SNIA Professional · SNIA FC-SAN Practitioner · IBM C AIX S · TSM CP · TSRM CP · TASS DP · IBM SAN P Sími/tel: +354 569-7700 · GSM: +354 863-0560 www.nyherji.is "Barnes, Kenny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 18.08.2005 12:51 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc Subject Re: [ADSM-L] How to delete copystg data for a single node? Wouldn't "Del vol discard=yes" delete all data for all nodes found on the volume? Would work if you were using collocation. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Schaub Joachim Paul ABX-SECE-ZH Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 8:41 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: AW: How to delete copystg data for a single node? Delete volume discardd=yes Read the help first under help del vol Regards joachim -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Niklas LundströM Gesendet: Donnerstag, 18. August 2005 13:45 An: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Betreff: How to delete copystg data for a single node? Hello I have move the data for a node from 3590 to our VTS, The VTS is running PPRC so the data is automaticly copied betwen two VTS's. That means that I don't need to backup the data in the primary storagepool for that node, but how do I delete the data that is already copied to the copypool? tsm: SPADAB-PROD>q occu spnt85 Node Name Type Filespace FSID Storage Number of Physical Logical Name Pool Name Files Space Space Occupied Occupied (MB) (MB) -- -- - -- - - - SPNT85 Bkup \\spnt85\- 1 BUNKERCOPY 6 84.92 84.92 e$ SPNT85 Bkup \\spnt85\- 1 COPYPOOL 28,134 2,005.95 1,992.37 e$ SPNT85 Bkup \\spnt85\- 1 DIRPOOL 3,197 4.63 4.63 e$ SPNT85 Bkup \\spnt85\- 1 VTSPOOL 28,134 1,992.37 1,992.37 e$ SPNT85 Bkup \\spnt85\- 2 BUNKERCOPY 22 5.62 4.58 c$ SPNT85 Bkup \\spnt85\- 2 COPYPOOL 11,072 1,050.12 1,019.06 c$ SPNT85 Bkup \\spnt85\- 2 DIRPOOL 1,897 2.85 2.58 c$ SPNT85 Bkup \\spnt85\- 2 VTSPOOL 11,072 1,019.05 1,019.05 c$ SPNT85 Bkup SYSTEM 3 BUNKERCOPY 5,349 427.33 427.33 OBJECT SPNT85 Bkup SYSTEM 3 COPYPOOL 5,349 427.33 427.33 OBJECT SPNT85 Bkup SYSTEM 3 VTSPOOL 5,349 427.33 427.33 OBJECT What I want to do is to delete the data in the BUNKERCOPY and COPYPOOL for the node spnt85 Regards Niklas Lundström Swedbank -- Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you. --
Re: How to delete copystg data for a single node?
Wouldn't "Del vol discard=yes" delete all data for all nodes found on the volume? Would work if you were using collocation. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Schaub Joachim Paul ABX-SECE-ZH Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 8:41 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: AW: How to delete copystg data for a single node? Delete volume discardd=yes Read the help first under help del vol Regards joachim -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Niklas LundströM Gesendet: Donnerstag, 18. August 2005 13:45 An: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Betreff: How to delete copystg data for a single node? Hello I have move the data for a node from 3590 to our VTS, The VTS is running PPRC so the data is automaticly copied betwen two VTS's. That means that I don't need to backup the data in the primary storagepool for that node, but how do I delete the data that is already copied to the copypool? tsm: SPADAB-PROD>q occu spnt85 Node Name Type Filespace FSID StorageNumber of Physical Logical Name Pool Name Files Space Space Occupied Occupied (MB) (MB) -- -- - -- - - - SPNT85 Bkup \\spnt85\- 1 BUNKERCOPY 6 84.92 84.92 e$ SPNT85 Bkup \\spnt85\- 1 COPYPOOL 28,134 2,005.95 1,992.37 e$ SPNT85 Bkup \\spnt85\- 1 DIRPOOL3,197 4.63 4.63 e$ SPNT85 Bkup \\spnt85\- 1 VTSPOOL 28,134 1,992.37 1,992.37 e$ SPNT85 Bkup \\spnt85\- 2 BUNKERCOPY22 5.62 4.58 c$ SPNT85 Bkup \\spnt85\- 2 COPYPOOL 11,072 1,050.12 1,019.06 c$ SPNT85 Bkup \\spnt85\- 2 DIRPOOL1,897 2.85 2.58 c$ SPNT85 Bkup \\spnt85\- 2 VTSPOOL 11,072 1,019.05 1,019.05 c$ SPNT85 Bkup SYSTEM 3 BUNKERCOPY 5,349427.33427.33 OBJECT SPNT85 Bkup SYSTEM 3 COPYPOOL 5,349427.33427.33 OBJECT SPNT85 Bkup SYSTEM 3 VTSPOOL5,349427.33427.33 OBJECT What I want to do is to delete the data in the BUNKERCOPY and COPYPOOL for the node spnt85 Regards Niklas Lundström Swedbank -- Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you. --
AW: How to delete copystg data for a single node?
Delete volume discardd=yes Read the help first under help del vol Regards joachim -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Niklas LundströM Gesendet: Donnerstag, 18. August 2005 13:45 An: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Betreff: How to delete copystg data for a single node? Hello I have move the data for a node from 3590 to our VTS, The VTS is running PPRC so the data is automaticly copied betwen two VTS's. That means that I don't need to backup the data in the primary storagepool for that node, but how do I delete the data that is already copied to the copypool? tsm: SPADAB-PROD>q occu spnt85 Node Name Type Filespace FSID StorageNumber of Physical Logical Name Pool Name Files Space Space Occupied Occupied (MB) (MB) -- -- - -- - - - SPNT85 Bkup \\spnt85\- 1 BUNKERCOPY 6 84.92 84.92 e$ SPNT85 Bkup \\spnt85\- 1 COPYPOOL 28,134 2,005.95 1,992.37 e$ SPNT85 Bkup \\spnt85\- 1 DIRPOOL3,197 4.63 4.63 e$ SPNT85 Bkup \\spnt85\- 1 VTSPOOL 28,134 1,992.37 1,992.37 e$ SPNT85 Bkup \\spnt85\- 2 BUNKERCOPY22 5.62 4.58 c$ SPNT85 Bkup \\spnt85\- 2 COPYPOOL 11,072 1,050.12 1,019.06 c$ SPNT85 Bkup \\spnt85\- 2 DIRPOOL1,897 2.85 2.58 c$ SPNT85 Bkup \\spnt85\- 2 VTSPOOL 11,072 1,019.05 1,019.05 c$ SPNT85 Bkup SYSTEM 3 BUNKERCOPY 5,349427.33427.33 OBJECT SPNT85 Bkup SYSTEM 3 COPYPOOL 5,349427.33427.33 OBJECT SPNT85 Bkup SYSTEM 3 VTSPOOL5,349427.33427.33 OBJECT What I want to do is to delete the data in the BUNKERCOPY and COPYPOOL for the node spnt85 Regards Niklas Lundström Swedbank
Re: preschedulecmd questions
The preschedulecmd can be an os script or program. So if you can identify your conditions from an OS program, you can certainly program it to do different things. david >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/17/05 3:16 PM >>> Hi, Is there a way to run different commands before and after different schedules on the same client? Also, it is possible for the commands to be conditionally based on certain criteria ? Rich
How to delete copystg data for a single node?
Hello I have move the data for a node from 3590 to our VTS, The VTS is running PPRC so the data is automaticly copied betwen two VTS's. That means that I don't need to backup the data in the primary storagepool for that node, but how do I delete the data that is already copied to the copypool? tsm: SPADAB-PROD>q occu spnt85 Node Name Type Filespace FSID StorageNumber of Physical Logical Name Pool Name Files Space Space Occupied Occupied (MB) (MB) -- -- - -- - - - SPNT85 Bkup \\spnt85\- 1 BUNKERCOPY 6 84.92 84.92 e$ SPNT85 Bkup \\spnt85\- 1 COPYPOOL 28,134 2,005.95 1,992.37 e$ SPNT85 Bkup \\spnt85\- 1 DIRPOOL3,197 4.63 4.63 e$ SPNT85 Bkup \\spnt85\- 1 VTSPOOL 28,134 1,992.37 1,992.37 e$ SPNT85 Bkup \\spnt85\- 2 BUNKERCOPY22 5.62 4.58 c$ SPNT85 Bkup \\spnt85\- 2 COPYPOOL 11,072 1,050.12 1,019.06 c$ SPNT85 Bkup \\spnt85\- 2 DIRPOOL1,897 2.85 2.58 c$ SPNT85 Bkup \\spnt85\- 2 VTSPOOL 11,072 1,019.05 1,019.05 c$ SPNT85 Bkup SYSTEM 3 BUNKERCOPY 5,349427.33427.33 OBJECT SPNT85 Bkup SYSTEM 3 COPYPOOL 5,349427.33427.33 OBJECT SPNT85 Bkup SYSTEM 3 VTSPOOL5,349427.33427.33 OBJECT What I want to do is to delete the data in the BUNKERCOPY and COPYPOOL for the node spnt85 Regards Niklas Lundström Swedbank
Re: LTO2 device class with LTO1 tapes!
Use the chcekout libvolume command to checkout the generation 2 tapes then check them back in with status=pri, then use the define volumes command to define them into the storage pool, just be carefull to use the exact name that shows up in the libvolume command. then you need to update the storage pool to max scrach to 0 make the gen 1 tapes in the gen 2 storagepool readonly and move the data to the same pool with move data command. Kær kveðja / Best regards, Pétur Eyþórsson · Tæknilegur ráðgjafi eServer & Storage · Tivoli Advanced Storage Solutons Techical Expert · MCSE · SNIA Professional · SNIA FC-SAN Practitioner · IBM C AIX S · TSM CP · TSRM CP · TASS DP · IBM SAN P Sími/tel: +354 569-7700 · GSM: +354 863-0560 www.nyherji.is Mladen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 18.08.2005 09:27 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc Subject Re: [ADSM-L] LTO2 device class with LTO1 tapes! Thank You Pétur for your fast answer and I want clear some things! If I do: tsm: HRATSM>q vol stg=offsitecopy Volume Name Storage Device Estimated Pct Volume Pool Name Class Name Capacity Util Status (MB) --- -- - - A00168 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 335,080.2 61.1 Full A00170 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 370,381.8 79.3 Full A00182 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 195,877.9 63.9 Full A00200 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 438,362.8 89.1 Full A00203 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 423,769.0 62.3 Filling A00204 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 409,600.0 39.5 Filling A00215 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 428,231.9 44.0 Filling A00217 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 535,332.8 33.9 Filling A00219 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 522,171.3 98.3 Full A00223 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 698,584.8 100.0 Full A00230 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 692,005.1 60.5 Full A00232 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 542,604.6 100.0 Full A00233 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 475,414.4 99.4 Full A00234 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 434,935.7 62.2 Full A00236 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 670,827.9 78.6 Full A00237 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 281,078.9 84.6 Full A00238 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 348,872.4 91.6 Full A00240 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 368,151.0 94.9 Full A00241 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 564,432.6 100.0 Full A00242 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 722,145.8 14.9 Full A00244 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 566,354.5 0.8 Full A00245 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 569,942.7 84.0 Full A00246 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 469,257.2 99.5 Full A00247 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 742,283.8 45.0 Full A00248 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 505,558.0 99.7 Full A00249 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 472,326.0 7.4 Full A00252 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 537,003.9 79.1 Full A00253 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 290,660.4 100.0 Full A00254 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 534,801.8 100.0 Full A00255 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 661,804.7 92.8 Full A00256 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 648,037.3 63.5 Full A00257 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 728,838.6 86.1 Full A00258 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 625,057.7 98.6 Full A00259 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 413,407.0 100.0 Full This labels with A001* are LTO1 tapes! How can I assign LTO2 tapes to a specific StoragePoll? I have lot of Scratch volumes! If you could explain me in a short how to do that! Thank You in advance! Mladen Portak -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pétur Eyţórsson Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 10:44 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] LTO2 device class with LTO
Re: Problems with BMR on W2K (missing DLL's after restore)
Hello, We did some testing the last days, because we were afraid that our current DR-procedure didn't work anymore on W2K-servers were IIS is running. Restore with TSM 5.2.2.0 client, without first restoring Catroot: OK, but WFP restores a lot of old protected files Restore with TSM 5.2.2.0 client, first restoring Catroot: OK, but WFP restores only inseng.dll and mshtml.dll (just 2 old files) Restore with TSM 5.3.0.15 client, without first restoring Catroot: OK, but WFP restores still 66 old protected files Restore with TSM 5.3.0.15 client, first restoring Catroot: OK, but WFP restore only inseng.dll Conclusion: we are now investigating what the impact is of the restored dll's on the operating system. We are going to add the restore of the Catroot in our DR-procedure, but without the Catroot it is still working. It's only a problem with the 5.2 client on W2K-systems with IIS and Exchange. Systems with only IIS and 5.2 clients we have no problems. Regards, Mike _ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
Re: LTO2 device class with LTO1 tapes!
Thank You Pétur for your fast answer and I want clear some things! If I do: tsm: HRATSM>q vol stg=offsitecopy Volume Name Storage Device Estimated Pct Volume Pool Name Class Name Capacity Util Status (MB) --- -- - - A00168 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 335,080.2 61.1 Full A00170 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 370,381.8 79.3 Full A00182 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 195,877.9 63.9 Full A00200 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 438,362.8 89.1 Full A00203 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 423,769.0 62.3 Filling A00204 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 409,600.0 39.5 Filling A00215 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 428,231.9 44.0 Filling A00217 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 535,332.8 33.9 Filling A00219 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 522,171.3 98.3 Full A00223 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 698,584.8 100.0 Full A00230 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 692,005.1 60.5 Full A00232 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 542,604.6 100.0 Full A00233 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 475,414.4 99.4 Full A00234 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 434,935.7 62.2 Full A00236 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 670,827.9 78.6 Full A00237 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 281,078.9 84.6 Full A00238 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 348,872.4 91.6 Full A00240 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 368,151.0 94.9 Full A00241 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 564,432.6 100.0 Full A00242 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 722,145.8 14.9 Full A00244 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 566,354.5 0.8 Full A00245 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 569,942.7 84.0 Full A00246 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 469,257.2 99.5 Full A00247 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 742,283.8 45.0 Full A00248 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 505,558.0 99.7 Full A00249 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 472,326.0 7.4 Full A00252 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 537,003.9 79.1 Full A00253 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 290,660.4 100.0 Full A00254 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 534,801.8 100.0 Full A00255 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 661,804.7 92.8 Full A00256 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 648,037.3 63.5 Full A00257 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 728,838.6 86.1 Full A00258 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 625,057.7 98.6 Full A00259 OFFSITECOPY LTO2 413,407.0 100.0 Full This labels with A001* are LTO1 tapes! How can I assign LTO2 tapes to a specific StoragePoll? I have lot of Scratch volumes! If you could explain me in a short how to do that! Thank You in advance! Mladen Portak -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pétur Eyţórsson Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 10:44 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] LTO2 device class with LTO1 tapes! Mladen how do you look at the volumes, if you see them in q libvol, that is to bee expected, as this shows you all volumes that tsm has access in the library regardless of there storagepool. but if you see them in your q vol command then you might have a problem, one solution to this is to define the LTO gen 2 volumes manually to the storage pool and not have it take scratch volumes (chance Maximum Scratch Volumes Allowed to 0 instead of 50), if you do that you can bee 100% sure that tsm wont take generation 1 tapes to that pool. Kær kveðja / Best regards, Pétur Eyþórsson · Tæknilegur ráðgjafi eServer & Storage · Tivoli Advanced Storage Solutons Techical Expert · MCSE · SNIA Professional · SNIA FC-SAN Practitioner · IBM C AIX S · TSM CP · TSRM CP · TASS DP · IBM SAN P Sími/tel: +354 569-7700 · GSM: +354 863-0560 www.nyherji.is Mladen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 18.08.2005 07:40
Re: Domino 6.5.4 w/ TDP 5.1.5
Yes your TDP 5.1.5 will work at TSM level 4.2. and later. here you can find the client with the latest patch, you only need the licence file in order to make it work (domino.lic or somehting) ftp://service.boulder.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management/patches/tivoli-data-protection/domino/win32/v5151/ "It´s better to aim at perfection and miss than it is to aim at imperfection and hit it" Founder Thomas J. Watson Kær kveðja / Best regards, Pétur Eyþórsson · Tæknilegur ráðgjafi eServer & Storage · Tivoli Advanced Storage Solutons Techical Expert · MCSE · SNIA Professional · SNIA FC-SAN Practitioner · IBM C AIX S · TSM CP · TSRM CP · TASS DP · IBM SAN P Sími/tel: +354 569-7700 · GSM: +354 863-0560 www.nyherji.is Matthew Large <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 18.08.2005 09:06 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc Subject [ADSM-L] Domino 6.5.4 w/ TDP 5.1.5 Hi SMers, I'm looking for a statement which proves to my superiors that TSM will comfortably backup Domino 6.5.4, through the 5.1.5 TDP, after the migration to new W2K3 servers. All I've found is a few statements on the IBM Domino forum which state that problems were experienced with the 5.1.5 on W2K3 and that the recommendation is to upgrade to the 5.3.1 TDP. http://www-10.lotus.com/ldd/nd6forum.nsf/55c38d716d632d9b8525689b005ba1c0/560bdd283da2e7938525700e006c8b43?OpenDocument Will the TDP 5.3.1 work with our 5.2.1 server? I'm sure I've read that later clients cannot be used with earlier server versions, but I'm not sure if it applies to TDP's aswell.. Many Thanks, Matthew Aviva plc Registered Office: St. Helen's, 1 Undershaft, London EC3P 3DQ Registered in England Number 02468686 www.aviva.com This message and any attachments are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please telephone or e-mail the sender and delete this message and any attachment from your system. Also, if you are not the intended recipient you must not copy this message or attachment or disclose the contents to any other person.
Domino 6.5.4 w/ TDP 5.1.5
Hi SMers, I'm looking for a statement which proves to my superiors that TSM will comfortably backup Domino 6.5.4, through the 5.1.5 TDP, after the migration to new W2K3 servers. All I've found is a few statements on the IBM Domino forum which state that problems were experienced with the 5.1.5 on W2K3 and that the recommendation is to upgrade to the 5.3.1 TDP. http://www-10.lotus.com/ldd/nd6forum.nsf/55c38d716d632d9b8525689b005ba1c0/560bdd283da2e7938525700e006c8b43?OpenDocument Will the TDP 5.3.1 work with our 5.2.1 server? I'm sure I've read that later clients cannot be used with earlier server versions, but I'm not sure if it applies to TDP's aswell.. Many Thanks, Matthew Aviva plc Registered Office: St. Helen's, 1 Undershaft, London EC3P 3DQ Registered in England Number 02468686 www.aviva.com This message and any attachments are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please telephone or e-mail the sender and delete this message and any attachment from your system. Also, if you are not the intended recipient you must not copy this message or attachment or disclose the contents to any other person.
Re: LTO2 device class with LTO1 tapes!
Mladen how do you look at the volumes, if you see them in q libvol, that is to bee expected, as this shows you all volumes that tsm has access in the library regardless of there storagepool. but if you see them in your q vol command then you might have a problem, one solution to this is to define the LTO gen 2 volumes manually to the storage pool and not have it take scratch volumes (chance Maximum Scratch Volumes Allowed to 0 instead of 50), if you do that you can bee 100% sure that tsm wont take generation 1 tapes to that pool. Kær kveðja / Best regards, Pétur Eyþórsson · Tæknilegur ráðgjafi eServer & Storage · Tivoli Advanced Storage Solutons Techical Expert · MCSE · SNIA Professional · SNIA FC-SAN Practitioner · IBM C AIX S · TSM CP · TSRM CP · TASS DP · IBM SAN P Sími/tel: +354 569-7700 · GSM: +354 863-0560 www.nyherji.is Mladen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 18.08.2005 07:40 Please respond to "ADSM: nager" To ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc Subject [ADSM-L] LTO2 device class with LTO1 tapes! Hi there, I have 3584 library with mixed drives (4xLTO1 and 2xLTO2) and mixed tapes. Recently I was created copy pool based on LTO2 tapes. > Storage Pool Name: OFFSITECOPY Storage Pool Type: Copy Device Class Name: LTO2 Estimated Capacity (MB): 25,328,227.2 Pct Util: 49.7 Pct Migr: Pct Logical: 99.9 High Mig Pct: Low Mig Pct: Migration Delay: Migration Continue: Migration Processes: Next Storage Pool: Reclaim Storage Pool: Maximum Size Threshold: Access: Read/Write Description: Copy OffsiteCopy Overflow Location: Cache Migrated Files?: Collocate?: No Reclamation Threshold: 50 Maximum Scratch Volumes Allowed: 50 Delay Period for Volume Reuse: 0 Day(s) Migration in Progress?: Amount Migrated (MB): Elapsed Migration Time (seconds): Reclamation in Progress?: No Volume Being Migrated/Reclaimed: Last Update by (administrator): ADMIN Last Update Date/Time: 08/17/05 20:00:06 Storage Pool Data Format: Native Copy Storage Pool(s): Continue Copy on Error?: CRC Data: No Device Class Name: LTO2 Device Access Strategy: Sequential Storage Pool Count: 4 Device Type: LTO Format: ULTRIUM2C Est/Max Capacity (MB): 409,600.0 Mount Limit: DRIVES Mount Wait (min): 60 Mount Retention (min): 0 Label Prefix: ADSM Library: 3584LIB Directory: Server Name: Retry Period: Retry Interval: Shared: High-level Address: Minimum Capacity: WORM: No Scaled Capacity: Last Update by (administrator): ADMIN Last Update Date/Time: 02/22/05 10:05:52 Everything working fine but if I look at volumes I can see that I have mixed LTO1 and LTO2 tapes. So my question is what I did wrong? Please if somebody can answer me I would be very thankful! Thank's in advance Mladen Portak
LTO2 device class with LTO1 tapes!
Hi there, I have 3584 library with mixed drives (4xLTO1 and 2xLTO2) and mixed tapes. Recently I was created copy pool based on LTO2 tapes. > Storage Pool Name: OFFSITECOPY Storage Pool Type: Copy Device Class Name: LTO2 Estimated Capacity (MB): 25,328,227.2 Pct Util: 49.7 Pct Migr: Pct Logical: 99.9 High Mig Pct: Low Mig Pct: Migration Delay: Migration Continue: Migration Processes: Next Storage Pool: Reclaim Storage Pool: Maximum Size Threshold: Access: Read/Write Description: Copy OffsiteCopy Overflow Location: Cache Migrated Files?: Collocate?: No Reclamation Threshold: 50 Maximum Scratch Volumes Allowed: 50 Delay Period for Volume Reuse: 0 Day(s) Migration in Progress?: Amount Migrated (MB): Elapsed Migration Time (seconds): Reclamation in Progress?: No Volume Being Migrated/Reclaimed: Last Update by (administrator): ADMIN Last Update Date/Time: 08/17/05 20:00:06 Storage Pool Data Format: Native Copy Storage Pool(s): Continue Copy on Error?: CRC Data: No Device Class Name: LTO2 Device Access Strategy: Sequential Storage Pool Count: 4 Device Type: LTO Format: ULTRIUM2C Est/Max Capacity (MB): 409,600.0 Mount Limit: DRIVES Mount Wait (min): 60 Mount Retention (min): 0 Label Prefix: ADSM Library: 3584LIB Directory: Server Name: Retry Period: Retry Interval: Shared: High-level Address: Minimum Capacity: WORM: No Scaled Capacity: Last Update by (administrator): ADMIN Last Update Date/Time: 02/22/05 10:05:52 Everything working fine but if I look at volumes I can see that I have mixed LTO1 and LTO2 tapes. So my question is what I did wrong? Please if somebody can answer me I would be very thankful! Thank's in advance Mladen Portak
