Re: Schedule Repeatation

2006-03-19 Thread Pranav Parikh
Thanks Jim,

I will do this and let you know.

Regards
Pranav



JN
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]   To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
.COM>cc:
Sent by: Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Schedule 
Repeatation
"ADSM: Dist
Stor Manager"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IST.EDU>


03/17/06 11:46
PM
Please respond
to "ADSM: Dist
Stor Manager"






Hi Pranav!

   If you really need to back up a client(s) that often with Tivoli, the
way
to do it is to create three separate schedules that run every hour and run
20 minutes apart.   Then assign the client to all three schedules. For
example:

   Start time Runs
   Schedule 1  09:00Hourly
   Schedule 2  09:20Hourly
   Schedule 3  09:40Hourly


   Please let me know if you need any additional info.


Jim Neal

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Pranav Parikh
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 4:10 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Schedule Repeatation

Thanks Richard, Requirement  is to backup incremental data contineously
every 15 to 20 mins.

Regards
Pranav




Richard Sims <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 
03/17/2006 05:35 PM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"


To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc:
Subject:Re: [ADSM-L] Schedule Repeatation


On Mar 17, 2006, at 5:38 AM, Pranav Parikh wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I had a requirement to backup client data every 15mins. Is it
> possible?
> can anyone help how to to do so in  ITSM 5.3 enviornment.

Given that client backups usually take substantially more than 15
minutes, that doesn't sound realistic with a "classic" backup product.

Your site needs to better define exactly what it is trying to
achieve. Your site may want a data protection product like Tivoli
Continuous Data Protection for Files (see http://www.ibm.com/software/
tivoli/products/continuous-data-protection/).

   Richard Sims


AW: Disaster recovery of Windows 2003 Server

2006-03-19 Thread Salak Juraj
Redpiece:
IBM Tivoli Storage Manager: Bare Machine Recovery for Microsoft Windows 2003 
and XP
 
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/redp3703.html?Open
 
regards
Juraj
 



Von: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager im Auftrag von Doyle, Patrick
Gesendet: Mo 13.03.2006 15:17
An: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Betreff: Disaster recovery of Windows 2003 Server



Has there been any updates to the disaster recovery documents for 2003
server?

The following refer to Windows 2000 only,

Disaster Recovery Strategies with Tivoli Storage Management
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/pdfs/sg246844.pdf

Summary BMR Procedures for Windows NT and Windows 2000 with ITSM
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/tips0102.html?Open


In particular, references to "dsmc restore systemobject" seem to be
obsolete. TSM Client 5.3.2.0 now sees "system services" and "system
state" as replacements for "systemobject".

Is anyone aware of an update?

Regatds,
Pat.


Zurich Insurance Ireland Limited t/a Eagle Star is regulated by the Financial 
Regulator
**
The contents of this e-mail and possible associated attachments
are for the addressee only. The integrity of this non-encrypted
message cannot be guaranteed on the internet.
Zurich Insurance Ireland Limited t/a Eagle Star is therefore
not responsible for the contents. If you are not the intended recipient,
please delete this e-mail and notify the sender
**


A 3494 foible, FYI

2006-03-19 Thread Richard Sims

This weekend we encountered a 3494 foible which 3494 customers should
be aware of...

The robotic actuator achieves vertical motion via a roughly 5' tall
steel helix. The helix is lubricated with a grease. Over time, the
grease dries out - and solidifies. The robot then strains to gain
elevation, which over-taxes the vertical drive motor and causes an
electrical Intervention Required. The associated panel message
specifies an IBM service call. They will respond by cleaning and re-
lubricating the shaft.

To prevent an outage of some hours, you may want to assure that your
CE is performing periodic re-lubrication of this assembly. One would
think that it would be on the list of PM tasks, but apparently it is
not.

Other robotic library types may have a similar vulnerability.

   Richard Sims