Re: I need some clarification

2006-06-08 Thread Henrik Wahlstedt
 
Hi,

Look at this one: http://msgs.adsm.org/cgi-bin/get/adsm0202/289.html


//Henrik


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Andrew Raibeck
Sent: den 8 juni 2006 01:49
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: I need some clarification

Hi James,

What specifically were you told, and what specifically was unclear?

You can search the ADSM-L archives (try search.adsm.org or
www.mail-archive.com/adsm-l@vm.marist.edu/) at , which contains a large
number of posts related to your type of question. Specifically, try
searching on keywords RETONLY, RETEXTRA, VEREXISTS, VERDELETED, plus add
my last name to the list, and I know that should cough up some prior
posts that will help shed light on your questions. You might look at one
thread in particular, Confusion with retention values.

Regards,

Andy

Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew
Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

IBM Tivoli Storage Manager support web page:
http://www-306.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support/IBMTivoliStorag
eManager.html

The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The command line is your friend.
Good enough is the enemy of excellence.

ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 06/07/2006
03:17:44 PM:

 Hello Everyone,



  I need some clarifications.



 What do the following parameters mean, in basic terms..I need to
be
 able to recover for instance from today 45 days ago, so how would I 
 set up these parameters



 I have ask tsm support and I cannot get a clear answer, so hopefully 
 someone can help me.



 Versions Data Exists

 Versions Data Deleted

 Retain Extra Versions

 Retain Only Version



 Thank you in advance



 James




 ---
 Confidentiality Notice: The information in this e-mail and any 
 attachments thereto is intended for the named recipient(s) only.
 This e-mail, including any attachments, may contain information that 
 is privileged and confidential  and subject to legal restrictions and 
 penalties regarding its unauthorized disclosure or other use.
 If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that 
 any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action or 
 inaction in reliance on the contents of this e-mail and any of its 
 attachments is STRICTLY PROHIBITED.  If you have received this e-mail 
 in error, please immediately notify the sender via return e- mail; 
 delete this e-mail and all attachments from your e-mail system and 
 your computer system and network; and destroy any paper copies you may

 have in your possession. Thank you for your cooperation.


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.


Re: I need some clarification

2006-06-08 Thread Bernaldo de Quiros, Iban 1
Hi,

I will try to help you...

Versions Data Exists: the maximun number of versions that you are going to 
retain.

Versions Data Deleted: the maximun number of versions that you are going to 
retain after a file was deleted from the client.

Retain Extra Versions: This parameter specifies the number of days that an 
inactive version is retained. The file exists physically on the client. (45)

Retain Only Version: This parameter specifies the number of days that a file 
must be retained after it was deleted from the client. (45)

One example:

Versions Data Exists: 5
Versions Data Deleted: 2
Retain Extra Versions: 45
Retain Only Version: 45

Hope this could helps

Regards,

Ibán Bernaldo de Quirós Márquez 
Technical Specialist 
cell: + 34 659 01 91 12 
Sun Microsystems Iberia



-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager on behalf of Lepre, James
Sent: Thu 08/06/2006 0:17
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] I need some clarification
 
Hello Everyone,

 

 I need some clarifications.

 

What do the following parameters mean, in basic terms..I need to be
able to recover for instance from today 45 days ago, so how would I set
up these parameters

 

I have ask tsm support and I cannot get a clear answer, so hopefully
someone can help me.

 

Versions Data Exists

Versions Data Deleted

Retain Extra Versions

Retain Only Version

 

Thank you in advance

 

James 


  
  
---
Confidentiality Notice: The information in this e-mail and any attachments 
thereto is intended for the named recipient(s) only.  This e-mail, including 
any attachments, may contain information that is privileged and confidential  
and subject to legal restrictions and penalties regarding its unauthorized 
disclosure or other use.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby 
notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any 
action or inaction in reliance on the contents of this e-mail and any of its 
attachments is STRICTLY PROHIBITED.  If you have received this e-mail in error, 
please immediately notify the sender via return e-mail; delete this e-mail and 
all attachments from your e-mail  system and your computer system and network; 
and destroy any paper copies you may have in your possession. Thank you for 
your cooperation.


Retention Query

2006-06-08 Thread Matthews, Gary
 Hi,

Am a complete newbie when it  comes to TSM and have just been handed a
W2K3 system to look after with TSM 5.3. The system hasn't gone live yet
and I'm trying to work out how many tapes I'm going to need for
offsiting. We have four pools for onsite with the following setup


Vers Data  exits28
Retain extra(days)  31
Vers Deleted2
Retain Vers (days)  60

Do the copypools have the same characteristics?  If I'm sending four
tapes off a day how may tapes do I need for an offsite cycle ?? It's
just that the company that set things up have said that 30 LTO-3s should
be enough for onsite and offsite and I can't see how.

TIA

Gary (confused!) 


This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended 
recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential 
information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, 
disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended 
recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all 
copies and inform the sender. Thank you.


Missing dsmj + dsmj.jar in TSM534C.tivoli.tsm.client. for AIX

2006-06-08 Thread Peter Duempert
Hi TSM'ers,

Current status:
AIX 5.3 ML4
TSM-client 5.3.2 ( no dsmj script )


Having downloaded into /tmp the
TSM534C.tivoli.tsm.client.ba.tar.Z
followed by
cd /tmp; mkdir tsm324; cd tsm534;
gtar zxvf ../TSM534C.tivoli.tsm.client.ba.tar.Z
inutoc `pwd`

producing the following files:

# ls -al /tmp/tsm534
total 99168
drwxr-xr-x   2 root system 4096 Jun 08 10:34 .
drwxrwxrwt  23 bin  bin   24576 Jun 08 12:00 ..
-rw-r--r--   1 root system 4837 Jun 08 10:34 .toc
-rwxr-xr-x   1 root system 2731 Apr 20 02:20 README.NAS
-rw-r--r--   1 root system23404 Apr 20 02:20
README_api_enu.htm
-rw-r--r--   1 root system85143 Apr 20 02:20 README_enu.htm
-rw-rw-r--   1 root system  7389184 Apr 20 02:16
tivoli.tsm.books.en_US.client
-rw-rw-r--   1 root system 10816512 Apr 20 02:18
tivoli.tsm.client.api.32bit
-rw-rw-r--   1 root system  6294528 Apr 20 02:20
tivoli.tsm.client.api.64bit
-rw-rw-r--   1 root system 23524352 Apr 20 02:17
tivoli.tsm.client.ba
-rw-rw-r--   1 root system  2587648 Apr 20 02:18
tivoli.tsm.client.jbb


Finally I ran a
smitty update_all
using the above extracted filesets in /tmp/tsm534 and having
installed/updated the following:

# lslpp -l tivoli.tsm*
  Fileset  Level  State  Description


Path: /usr/lib/objrepos
  tivoli.tsm.books.en_US.client.pdf
 5.3.4.0  COMMITTED  TSM BOOKS - Using UNIX
Clients
 - PDF Format
  tivoli.tsm.client.api.32bit
 5.3.4.0  COMMITTED  TSM Client - Application
 Programming Interface
32bit
  tivoli.tsm.client.ba.32bit.base
 5.3.4.0  COMMITTED  TSM Client -
Backup/Archive
 Base Files
  tivoli.tsm.client.ba.32bit.common
 5.3.4.0  COMMITTED  TSM Client -
Backup/Archive
 Common Files
  tivoli.tsm.client.ba.32bit.image
 5.3.4.0  COMMITTED  TSM Client - IMAGE Backup
 Client


Trying to run dsmj produced:

# dsmj
ksh: command not found: dsmj


Further investigation for the missing file(s):

bib2lp2# find /usr/tivoli -name *.jar
/usr/tivoli/tsm/client/lang/en_US/tsmhelp.jar
/usr/tivoli/tsm/client/lang/en_US/uil_nls.jar
bib2lp2# find /usr/tivoli -name dsmj

E.g. on a LINUX-box I find that dsmj is located in the TIVsm-BA rpm
but on AIX dsmj is neither in
lslpp -f tivoli.tsm.client.ba.32bit.common|grep -i dsmj
nor in
lslpp -f tivoli.tsm.client.ba.32bit.base|grep -i dsmj

Running
restore -Tvf /tmp/tsm534/tivoli.tsm.client.ba|grep dsmj
produces
# restore -Tvf tivoli.tsm.client.ba|grep dsmj
Please mount volume 1 on tivoli.tsm.client.ba.
Press the Enter key to continue.

New volume on tivoli.tsm.client.ba:
Cluster size is 51200 bytes (100 blocks).
The volume number is 1.
The backup date is: Thu Apr 20 02:14:00 DFT 2006
Files are backed up by name.
The user is BUILD.
The number of archived files is 40.
 971 ./usr/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/dsm.sys.smp
 782 ./usr/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/dsm.opt.smp
 2430533 ./usr/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/dsmtca
 5464097 ./usr/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/dsmc
 2619114 ./usr/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/dsmadmc
   27093 ./usr/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/dsmswitch
   24403 ./usr/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/dsmgpfs.drv
  456036 ./usr/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/dsmtrace
 2063542 ./usr/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/dsm.jar
  612302 ./usr/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/dsm_pref.jar
5119 ./usr/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/dsmj
 2683100 ./usr/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/dsmcad
 6368267 ./usr/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/dsmagent

i.e. the dsmj-related files are there !!!


QUESTION:
Is there some trick telling smitty to install dsmj?

Hope I've given enough evidence for my problem and look forward for
some explanation.

Thanks, Peter

-- 
MfG / Ciao - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Peter Dümpert   Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rechenzentrum der Technischen Universität   Fax  : ++49/531/391-5549
D 38092 BraunschweigTel  : ++49/531/391-5535


Re: Retention Query

2006-06-08 Thread Bill Dourado
Gary,

Do the copypools have the same characteristics?   The answer is YES...if
for example you have
 20 backup versions of a file on your ONLINE poolthere should be 20 on
the COPYPOOL.

You don't have to send off 4 copypool tapes each  day,  one will do.

We have six online diskpools   six corresponding online tapepools but the
data is backed up
 to one COPYPOOL tape which is sent off site on a daily basis.

Regards

Bill








Matthews, Gary [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
08/06/2006 11:00
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager

To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc:
Subject:[ADSM-L] Retention Query


 Hi,

Am a complete newbie when it  comes to TSM and have just been handed a
W2K3 system to look after with TSM 5.3. The system hasn't gone live yet
and I'm trying to work out how many tapes I'm going to need for
offsiting. We have four pools for onsite with the following setup


Vers Data  exits 28
Retain extra(days)   31
Vers Deleted 2
Retain Vers (days)   60

Do the copypools have the same characteristics?  If I'm sending four
tapes off a day how may tapes do I need for an offsite cycle ?? It's
just that the company that set things up have said that 30 LTO-3s should
be enough for onsite and offsite and I can't see how.

TIA

Gary (confused!)


This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended
recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential
information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied,
disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an
intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any
attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you.



*** Disclaimer ***
This email and any files transmitted with it contains privileged and
confidential information and is intended for the addressee only. If you
are not the intended recipient you must not disseminate, distribute or
copy this email. Please notify the sender at once that you have received
it by mistake and then delete it from your system.

Any views expressed in this email are those of the sender and not
necessarily those of ALSTEC or its associated companies.

Whereas ALSTEC takes reasonable precautions to ensure this email is virus
free, no responsibility will be accepted by it for any loss or damage
whether direct or indirect which results from the contents of this email
or its attachments.

ALSTEC Group Limited - Registered in England No.3939840 - www.alstec.com
Registered office: Cambridge Road, Whetstone, Leicester. LE8 6LH. England.
Telephone: +44 (0)116 275 0750


Re: I need some clarification

2006-06-08 Thread Lepre, James
So you are saying that if I have the need to restore from today, 45 days ago, 
then each parameter should be 45

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bernaldo 
de Quiros, Iban 1
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 4:27 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] I need some clarification

Hi,

I will try to help you...

Versions Data Exists: the maximun number of versions that you are going to 
retain.

Versions Data Deleted: the maximun number of versions that you are going to 
retain after a file was deleted from the client.

Retain Extra Versions: This parameter specifies the number of days that an 
inactive version is retained. The file exists physically on the client. (45)

Retain Only Version: This parameter specifies the number of days that a file 
must be retained after it was deleted from the client. (45)

One example:

Versions Data Exists: 5
Versions Data Deleted: 2
Retain Extra Versions: 45
Retain Only Version: 45

Hope this could helps

Regards,

Ibán Bernaldo de Quirós Márquez 
Technical Specialist 
cell: + 34 659 01 91 12 
Sun Microsystems Iberia



-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager on behalf of Lepre, James
Sent: Thu 08/06/2006 0:17
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] I need some clarification
 
Hello Everyone,

 

 I need some clarifications.

 

What do the following parameters mean, in basic terms..I need to be
able to recover for instance from today 45 days ago, so how would I set
up these parameters

 

I have ask tsm support and I cannot get a clear answer, so hopefully
someone can help me.

 

Versions Data Exists

Versions Data Deleted

Retain Extra Versions

Retain Only Version

 

Thank you in advance

 

James 


  
  
---
Confidentiality Notice: The information in this e-mail and any attachments 
thereto is intended for the named recipient(s) only.  This e-mail, including 
any attachments, may contain information that is privileged and confidential  
and subject to legal restrictions and penalties regarding its unauthorized 
disclosure or other use.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby 
notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any 
action or inaction in reliance on the contents of this e-mail and any of its 
attachments is STRICTLY PROHIBITED.  If you have received this e-mail in error, 
please immediately notify the sender via return e-mail; delete this e-mail and 
all attachments from your e-mail  system and your computer system and network; 
and destroy any paper copies you may have in your possession. Thank you for 
your cooperation.


Re: I need some clarification

2006-06-08 Thread Smith, I (Ian)
 
Versions Data Exists: NOLIMIT
Versions Data Deleted: NOLIMIT
Retain Extra Versions: 45
Retain Only Version: 90

_
Ian Smith
SAN/TSM Specialist
Hitachi Data Systems Certified Professional



-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lepre, 
James
Sent: 08 June 2006 14:52
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] I need some clarification

So you are saying that if I have the need to restore from today, 45 days ago, 
then each parameter should be 45

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bernaldo 
de Quiros, Iban 1
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 4:27 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] I need some clarification

Hi,

I will try to help you...

Versions Data Exists: the maximun number of versions that you are going to 
retain.

Versions Data Deleted: the maximun number of versions that you are going to 
retain after a file was deleted from the client.

Retain Extra Versions: This parameter specifies the number of days that an 
inactive version is retained. The file exists physically on the client. (45)

Retain Only Version: This parameter specifies the number of days that a file 
must be retained after it was deleted from the client. (45)

One example:

Versions Data Exists: 5
Versions Data Deleted: 2
Retain Extra Versions: 45
Retain Only Version: 45

Hope this could helps

Regards,

Ibán Bernaldo de Quirós Márquez
Technical Specialist
cell: + 34 659 01 91 12
Sun Microsystems Iberia



-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager on behalf of Lepre, James
Sent: Thu 08/06/2006 0:17
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] I need some clarification
 
Hello Everyone,

 

 I need some clarifications.

 

What do the following parameters mean, in basic terms..I need to be
able to recover for instance from today 45 days ago, so how would I set up 
these parameters

 

I have ask tsm support and I cannot get a clear answer, so hopefully someone 
can help me.

 

Versions Data Exists

Versions Data Deleted

Retain Extra Versions

Retain Only Version

 

Thank you in advance

 

James 


  
  
---
Confidentiality Notice: The information in this e-mail and any attachments 
thereto is intended for the named recipient(s) only.  This e-mail, including 
any attachments, may contain information that is privileged and confidential  
and subject to legal restrictions and penalties regarding its unauthorized 
disclosure or other use.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby 
notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any 
action or inaction in reliance on the contents of this e-mail and any of its 
attachments is STRICTLY PROHIBITED.  If you have received this e-mail in error, 
please immediately notify the sender via return e-mail; delete this e-mail and 
all attachments from your e-mail  system and your computer system and network; 
and destroy any paper copies you may have in your possession. Thank you for 
your cooperation.
_

This email (including any attachments to it) is confidential, legally 
privileged, subject to copyright and is sent for the personal attention of the 
intended recipient only. If you have received this email in error, please 
advise us immediately and delete it. You are notified that disclosing, copying, 
distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this 
information is strictly prohibited. Although we have taken reasonable 
precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this email, we cannot accept 
responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the viruses in this email or 
attachments. We exclude any liability for the content of this email, or for the 
consequences of any actions taken on the basis of the information provided in 
this email or its attachments, unless that information is subsequently 
confirmed in writing. If this email contains an offer, that should be 
considered as an invitation to treat.
_


Re: I need some clarification

2006-06-08 Thread Lepre, James
Ok that makes sense, thank you 

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Smith, I 
(Ian)
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 9:52 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] I need some clarification

 
Versions Data Exists: NOLIMIT
Versions Data Deleted: NOLIMIT
Retain Extra Versions: 45
Retain Only Version: 90

_
Ian Smith
SAN/TSM Specialist
Hitachi Data Systems Certified Professional



-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lepre, 
James
Sent: 08 June 2006 14:52
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] I need some clarification

So you are saying that if I have the need to restore from today, 45 days ago, 
then each parameter should be 45

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bernaldo 
de Quiros, Iban 1
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 4:27 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] I need some clarification

Hi,

I will try to help you...

Versions Data Exists: the maximun number of versions that you are going to 
retain.

Versions Data Deleted: the maximun number of versions that you are going to 
retain after a file was deleted from the client.

Retain Extra Versions: This parameter specifies the number of days that an 
inactive version is retained. The file exists physically on the client. (45)

Retain Only Version: This parameter specifies the number of days that a file 
must be retained after it was deleted from the client. (45)

One example:

Versions Data Exists: 5
Versions Data Deleted: 2
Retain Extra Versions: 45
Retain Only Version: 45

Hope this could helps

Regards,

Ibán Bernaldo de Quirós Márquez
Technical Specialist
cell: + 34 659 01 91 12
Sun Microsystems Iberia



-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager on behalf of Lepre, James
Sent: Thu 08/06/2006 0:17
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] I need some clarification
 
Hello Everyone,

 

 I need some clarifications.

 

What do the following parameters mean, in basic terms..I need to be
able to recover for instance from today 45 days ago, so how would I set up 
these parameters

 

I have ask tsm support and I cannot get a clear answer, so hopefully someone 
can help me.

 

Versions Data Exists

Versions Data Deleted

Retain Extra Versions

Retain Only Version

 

Thank you in advance

 

James 


  
  
---
Confidentiality Notice: The information in this e-mail and any attachments 
thereto is intended for the named recipient(s) only.  This e-mail, including 
any attachments, may contain information that is privileged and confidential  
and subject to legal restrictions and penalties regarding its unauthorized 
disclosure or other use.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby 
notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any 
action or inaction in reliance on the contents of this e-mail and any of its 
attachments is STRICTLY PROHIBITED.  If you have received this e-mail in error, 
please immediately notify the sender via return e-mail; delete this e-mail and 
all attachments from your e-mail  system and your computer system and network; 
and destroy any paper copies you may have in your possession. Thank you for 
your cooperation.
_

This email (including any attachments to it) is confidential, legally 
privileged, subject to copyright and is sent for the personal attention of the 
intended recipient only. If you have received this email in error, please 
advise us immediately and delete it. You are notified that disclosing, copying, 
distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this 
information is strictly prohibited. Although we have taken reasonable 
precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this email, we cannot accept 
responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the viruses in this email or 
attachments. We exclude any liability for the content of this email, or for the 
consequences of any actions taken on the basis of the information provided in 
this email or its attachments, unless that information is subsequently 
confirmed in writing. If this email contains an offer, that should be 
considered as an invitation to treat.
_


Re: I need some clarification

2006-06-08 Thread Robin Sharpe
If you need to GUARANTEE data retention for 45 days, set the parameters as
follows:

Versions Data Exists = NOLIMIT
Versions Data Deleted = NOLIMIT
Retain Extra Versions = 45
Retain Only Version = 45

Why?

The Version Data Exists and Deleted parameters specify a number of
versions.  If you, or someone else, runs more than one selective or
absolute mode  backup per day, you may not get as many days retained as
you intended.  The Retain parameters specify the number of days to keep
inactive versions.

Robin Sharpe
Berlex Labs


   
 Lepre, James
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 COM   To 
 Sent by: ADSM:   ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Dist Stor  cc 
 Manager  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject 
 .EDU Re: I need some clarification   
   
   
 06/07/2006 06:17  
 PM
   
   
 Please respond to 
 ADSM: Dist Stor  
 Manager  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   .EDU   
   
   




Hello Everyone,



 I need some clarifications.



What do the following parameters mean, in basic terms..I need to be
able to recover for instance from today 45 days ago, so how would I set
up these parameters



I have ask tsm support and I cannot get a clear answer, so hopefully
someone can help me.



Versions Data Exists

Versions Data Deleted

Retain Extra Versions

Retain Only Version



Thank you in advance



James




---
Confidentiality Notice: The information in this e-mail and any attachments
thereto is intended for the named recipient(s) only.  This e-mail,
including any attachments, may contain information that is privileged and
confidential  and subject to legal restrictions and penalties regarding its
unauthorized disclosure or other use.  If you are not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying,
distribution, or the taking of any action or inaction in reliance on the
contents of this e-mail and any of its attachments is STRICTLY PROHIBITED.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the
sender via return e-mail; delete this e-mail and all attachments from your
e-mail  system and your computer system and network; and destroy any paper
copies you may have in your possession. Thank you for your cooperation.




ANS4028E

2006-06-08 Thread Murray, Jim
ANS4028E Error processing 'C:': cannot create file/directory entry

Any ideas as to why I would be getting the above error on a backup.
Everything I can find talks about checking permissions for a restore
nothing about this error and backups.

TSM ver 5.1.7 windows2003

Jim Murray
Senior Systems Engineer
Liberty Bank
860.638.2919
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

The Hurrier I go
The Behinder I get



**
Unless you have received this email through the Liberty Bank secure email 
system, before you respond, please consider that any unencrypted e-mail that is 
sent to us is not secure.  If you send regular e-mail to Liberty Bank, please 
do not include any private or confidential information such as social security 
numbers, unlisted telephone numbers, bank account numbers, personal income 
information, user names, passwords, etc.  If you need to provide us with such 
information, please telephone us at (888)570-0773 during business hours or 
write to us at 315 Main St. Middletown, CT 06457.

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which 
it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you 
are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any 
use, review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, reproduction or any 
action taken in reliance upon this message is prohibited and may be unlawful. 
If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the 
material from any computer without disclosing it. Any views expressed in this 
message are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the 
views of the Bank.   Thank you. 
**


Re: ANS4028E

2006-06-08 Thread Mark Stapleton
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 06/08/2006
09:04:08 AM:
 ANS4028E Error processing 'C:': cannot create file/directory entry

 Any ideas as to why I would be getting the above error on a backup.
 Everything I can find talks about checking permissions for a restore
 nothing about this error and backups.

 TSM ver 5.1.7 windows2003

Three suggestions:

1. The C: drive is full (or nearly).
2. Funky permissions mismatch between the login that the scheduler service
uses and the client.
3. Update your (out-of-support) version of the client, particularly in
light of the OS level. To fully support all client functionality for
Win2003, version 5.3.3.0 is the minimum required.

--
Mark Stapleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
US Bank MR Backup and Recovery Management
Office 262.790.3190
--
Electronic Privacy Notice. This e-mail, and any attachments, contains 
information that is, or may be, covered by electronic communications privacy 
laws, and is also confidential and proprietary in nature. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please be advised that you are legally prohibited from 
retaining, using, copying, distributing, or otherwise disclosing this 
information in any manner. Instead, please reply to the sender that you have 
received this communication in error, and then immediately delete it. Thank you 
in advance for your cooperation.
==


ANS2609S TCP/IP communications failure between the browser and the client machine

2006-06-08 Thread Schaub, Steve
server 5.2.2.0
client 5.3.2.0  5.3.0.5 on Win2003
 
The web gui on our 3 main fileservers seems to keep going unavailable
with this message: 
ANS2609S TCP/IP communications failure between the browser and the
client machine
 
since this is the only access our helpdesk is allowed on these servers
to do file restores, it is quite frustrating for them.
anyone seen this and have a solution?
 
sometimes I can get it back by recycling the CAD  remote agent
services, but often it requires a reboot (something not easy to get
permission for)
 
Steve Schaub
Systems Engineer, WNI
BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee
423-752-6574 (desk)
423-785-7347 (cell)
 
Please see the following link for the BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee E-mail
disclaimer:  http://www.bcbst.com/email_disclaimer.shtm


3584 Library

2006-06-08 Thread Gill, Geoffrey L.
I'm bringing up a remote AIX system with a 3584. Seems as though IBM left it
in an unusable state and I'm trying to figure out why. What I originally saw
was the below output minus the 3584 info. I ran cfgmgr and now have the
below output. What is odd to me is that there are 3 3584's showing up.



On the system I have here I only have the one. The defined drives I've seen
before too. In fact on the system I have here, if I reboot it a few of the
drives show up as defined instead of available. That doesn't happen with the
3490's on the other system. I still have one in that state and haven't been
able to bring it back as of yet. These 3 are similar and I'm at a loss as to
why IBM would leave an installation in a state like this.



Can anyone shed some light on the library or tape drive issue?



# lsdev -Cc tape

rmt0 Available 40-60-00-5,0 SCSI 4mm Tape Drive

rmt1 Available 14-08-02 Other FC SCSI Tape Drive

rmt2 Available 17-08-01 Other FC SCSI Tape Drive

rmt3 Available 54-08-01 Other FC SCSI Tape Drive

rmt4 Defined   1A-08-02 Other FC SCSI Tape Drive

rmt5 Defined   21-08-01 Other FC SCSI Tape Drive

rmt6 Defined   5A-08-01 Other FC SCSI Tape Drive

smc0 Available 14-08-02 IBM 3584 Library Medium Changer (FCP)

smc1 Available 17-08-01 IBM 3584 Library Medium Changer (FCP)

smc2 Available 54-08-01 IBM 3584 Library Medium Changer (FCP)





Thanks,



Geoff Gill

TSM Administrator

PeopleSoft Sr. Systems Administrator

SAIC M/S-G1b

(858)826-4062

Email:  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: 3584 Library

2006-06-08 Thread Dan Foster
Hot Diggety! Gill, Geoffrey L. was rumored to have written:
 I'm bringing up a remote AIX system with a 3584. Seems as though IBM
 left it in an unusable state and I'm trying to figure out why. What I
 originally saw was the below output minus the 3584 info. I ran cfgmgr
 and now have the below output. What is odd to me is that there are 3
 3584's showing up.

 Can anyone shed some light on the library or tape drive issue?

 # lsdev -Cc tape

 rmt0 Available 40-60-00-5,0 SCSI 4mm Tape Drive

 rmt1 Available 14-08-02 Other FC SCSI Tape Drive
 rmt2 Available 17-08-01 Other FC SCSI Tape Drive
 rmt3 Available 54-08-01 Other FC SCSI Tape Drive
 rmt4 Defined   1A-08-02 Other FC SCSI Tape Drive
 rmt5 Defined   21-08-01 Other FC SCSI Tape Drive
 rmt6 Defined   5A-08-01 Other FC SCSI Tape Drive
 smc0 Available 14-08-02 IBM 3584 Library Medium Changer (FCP)
 smc1 Available 17-08-01 IBM 3584 Library Medium Changer (FCP)
 smc2 Available 54-08-01 IBM 3584 Library Medium Changer (FCP)

A possibility is that there were multiple control paths defined in the
3584 library.

This can be adjusted via the 3584 front panel LCD, or I think, also the
web interface (though I never used it much due to the infamous 3584
ethernet issues).

The 'Other FC SCSI...' looks odd, though. Does the system have Atape
installed? And the drives are IBM LTO drives?

Could be that rmt4-6 was seen before additional control paths were
defined, because once you have additional CPs, your view of the drives
contained in them can be blocked.

Ultimately, I think you want to determine if the 3 CPs is what you want.
If not, needs to be set back to the default one CP for entire library.

You'll also want to figure out why the LTO tape drives aren't showing up
right if they're IBM LTO tape drives.

Another thing to triple check with the 3584, in my experience, is to
ensure the drives, library, and FC adapter microcode are all at the
latest available and stable revision.

If you're still stuck, even after adjusting all these as desired, then
please describe the 3584 setup (1 L32 and how many D32s, how many
drives, what type of drives and their mfr, microcode revs for library,
drives, and FC adapter, what FC adapter, what host type/model, what host
OS and version is running, level of Atape installed, etc.

-Dan


Re: ANS4028E

2006-06-08 Thread Richard Sims

Jim -

I would add to Mark's suggestions, one more possibility:
Look for a directory with garbage characters in its name; or, more
generally, execute a file system integrity and validity utility on
the file system. A message like this usually comes out when there's
something wacky with a file system.

   Richard Sims


Re: 3584 Library

2006-06-08 Thread James Choate
Geoff,

I would rmdev the smc devices and the rmt devices that are showing up as
Other SCSI devices.

Install the Atape driver.
ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/storage/devdrvr/AIX/

Then for your multiple smcs, if you don't have multiple paths defined,
you could have a zoning issue.

 

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Gill, Geoffrey L.
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 10:54 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: 3584 Library

I'm bringing up a remote AIX system with a 3584. Seems as though IBM
left it in an unusable state and I'm trying to figure out why. What I
originally saw was the below output minus the 3584 info. I ran cfgmgr
and now have the below output. What is odd to me is that there are 3
3584's showing up.



On the system I have here I only have the one. The defined drives I've
seen before too. In fact on the system I have here, if I reboot it a few
of the drives show up as defined instead of available. That doesn't
happen with the 3490's on the other system. I still have one in that
state and haven't been able to bring it back as of yet. These 3 are
similar and I'm at a loss as to why IBM would leave an installation in a
state like this.



Can anyone shed some light on the library or tape drive issue?



# lsdev -Cc tape

rmt0 Available 40-60-00-5,0 SCSI 4mm Tape Drive

rmt1 Available 14-08-02 Other FC SCSI Tape Drive

rmt2 Available 17-08-01 Other FC SCSI Tape Drive

rmt3 Available 54-08-01 Other FC SCSI Tape Drive

rmt4 Defined   1A-08-02 Other FC SCSI Tape Drive

rmt5 Defined   21-08-01 Other FC SCSI Tape Drive

rmt6 Defined   5A-08-01 Other FC SCSI Tape Drive

smc0 Available 14-08-02 IBM 3584 Library Medium Changer (FCP)

smc1 Available 17-08-01 IBM 3584 Library Medium Changer (FCP)

smc2 Available 54-08-01 IBM 3584 Library Medium Changer (FCP)





Thanks,



Geoff Gill

TSM Administrator

PeopleSoft Sr. Systems Administrator

SAIC M/S-G1b

(858)826-4062

Email:  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: 3584 Library

2006-06-08 Thread Jim Zajkowski

On Thu, 8 Jun 2006, Dan Foster wrote:


This can be adjusted via the 3584 front panel LCD, or I think, also the
web interface (though I never used it much due to the infamous 3584
ethernet issues).


Since I upgraded to firmware 5770 I haven't had trouble with the library
vanishing like I used to.  Has anyone else had trouble?

--Jim


Re: 3584 Library

2006-06-08 Thread Aaron Durkee
Hi,
  As said before hand they are control paths on the drives in the library.  
You'll need the atape driver and drivers for the lto drives themselves (i 
remember clearly installing new drivers when we went to lto2).  should have 
come on a cd with the library / drives.  or you can down load them from ibm.
  If you look over the atape manual you can set up failover for the smc devices 
which is one reason to set up multple control paths ..


 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/08/06 12:54PM 
I'm bringing up a remote AIX system with a 3584. Seems as though IBM left it
in an unusable state and I'm trying to figure out why. What I originally saw
was the below output minus the 3584 info. I ran cfgmgr and now have the
below output. What is odd to me is that there are 3 3584's showing up.



On the system I have here I only have the one. The defined drives I've seen
before too. In fact on the system I have here, if I reboot it a few of the
drives show up as defined instead of available. That doesn't happen with the
3490's on the other system. I still have one in that state and haven't been
able to bring it back as of yet. These 3 are similar and I'm at a loss as to
why IBM would leave an installation in a state like this.



Can anyone shed some light on the library or tape drive issue?



# lsdev -Cc tape

rmt0 Available 40-60-00-5,0 SCSI 4mm Tape Drive

rmt1 Available 14-08-02 Other FC SCSI Tape Drive

rmt2 Available 17-08-01 Other FC SCSI Tape Drive

rmt3 Available 54-08-01 Other FC SCSI Tape Drive

rmt4 Defined   1A-08-02 Other FC SCSI Tape Drive

rmt5 Defined   21-08-01 Other FC SCSI Tape Drive

rmt6 Defined   5A-08-01 Other FC SCSI Tape Drive

smc0 Available 14-08-02 IBM 3584 Library Medium Changer (FCP)

smc1 Available 17-08-01 IBM 3584 Library Medium Changer (FCP)

smc2 Available 54-08-01 IBM 3584 Library Medium Changer (FCP)





Thanks,



Geoff Gill

TSM Administrator

PeopleSoft Sr. Systems Administrator

SAIC M/S-G1b

(858)826-4062

Email:  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message is confidential, intended only for the 
named recipient(s) and may contain information that is privileged, or exempt 
from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient(s), 
you are notified that the dissemination, distribution or copying of this 
message is strictly prohibited. If you receive this message in error, or are 
not the named recipient(s), please notify the sender by reply e-mail, delete 
this e-mail from your computer, and destroy any copies in any form immediately. 
Receipt by anyone other than the named recipient(s) is not a waiver of any 
attorney-client, work product, or other applicable privilege.  This message and 
all contents may be reviewed by authorized parties of the Catholic Health 
System other than those named in the message header.

The contents of this message do not bind the Catholic Health System to any 
contract, position, or course of action unless the sender is specifically 
authorized to enter into contracts on behalf of the Catholic Health System. The 
contents of this message do not necessarily constitute an official 
representation of the Catholic Health System.


Re: 3584 Library

2006-06-08 Thread Gill, Geoffrey L.
The atape drivers are the latest on the download site and those I had
installed previously.

I did see the library was configured differently than the one here so I
changed those settings. I also removed the devices and re-ran cfgmgr. That
ended up showing just 3 tape drives. I enabled the control path for a second
drive and cfgmgr brought back smc0. Unfortunately just the 3 drives show up
though.

The fibre channel summary shows that first drive as being not available, no
link status, along with 2 others, which to me is why the library came back
once I enabled a working drive.

Looks like I still need IBM to get back out there and fix what they didn't
check when the system was initially installed.

By the way, has anyone else had this issue with IBM? Installing hardware and
not checking the system to make sure everything is available and online? The
put it on maintenance and we can fix it response to me is BS. Make sure it
is in working condition when you leave or stay until it is. Then I'll put it
on maintenance.

Thanks,

Geoff Gill
TSM Administrator
PeopleSoft Sr. Systems Administrator
SAIC M/S-G1b
(858)826-4062
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
James Choate
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 10:22 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: 3584 Library

Geoff,

I would rmdev the smc devices and the rmt devices that are showing up as
Other SCSI devices.

Install the Atape driver.
ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/storage/devdrvr/AIX/

Then for your multiple smcs, if you don't have multiple paths defined,
you could have a zoning issue.



-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Gill, Geoffrey L.
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 10:54 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: 3584 Library

I'm bringing up a remote AIX system with a 3584. Seems as though IBM
left it in an unusable state and I'm trying to figure out why. What I
originally saw was the below output minus the 3584 info. I ran cfgmgr
and now have the below output. What is odd to me is that there are 3
3584's showing up.



On the system I have here I only have the one. The defined drives I've
seen before too. In fact on the system I have here, if I reboot it a few
of the drives show up as defined instead of available. That doesn't
happen with the 3490's on the other system. I still have one in that
state and haven't been able to bring it back as of yet. These 3 are
similar and I'm at a loss as to why IBM would leave an installation in a
state like this.



Can anyone shed some light on the library or tape drive issue?



# lsdev -Cc tape

rmt0 Available 40-60-00-5,0 SCSI 4mm Tape Drive

rmt1 Available 14-08-02 Other FC SCSI Tape Drive

rmt2 Available 17-08-01 Other FC SCSI Tape Drive

rmt3 Available 54-08-01 Other FC SCSI Tape Drive

rmt4 Defined   1A-08-02 Other FC SCSI Tape Drive

rmt5 Defined   21-08-01 Other FC SCSI Tape Drive

rmt6 Defined   5A-08-01 Other FC SCSI Tape Drive

smc0 Available 14-08-02 IBM 3584 Library Medium Changer (FCP)

smc1 Available 17-08-01 IBM 3584 Library Medium Changer (FCP)

smc2 Available 54-08-01 IBM 3584 Library Medium Changer (FCP)





Thanks,



Geoff Gill

TSM Administrator

PeopleSoft Sr. Systems Administrator

SAIC M/S-G1b

(858)826-4062

Email:  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]


How to get rid of old TDP backups

2006-06-08 Thread fred johanson

We had an old NT cluster running MSSQL.  At the time it was decommissioned
it had several hundred Gb of backups on tape.  Naturally, after getting rid
of the machine, the owners decided they wanted to keep the active version
of each SQL db backup and I can have the storage back from all the deleted
inactive copies.  How can I do that?  Can I change the name in the options
file of an existing TDP agent to the departed and do a dlete backup from there?



Fred Johanson
ITSM Administrator
University of Chicago
773-702-8464


Re: How to get rid of old TDP backups

2006-06-08 Thread David Longo
Basically your answer is yes.  However one thing that has to be right is
the version of TDP on the client.  Was this old client a TDP version prior to 2?

If so, then you need a version 1.1 or whatever as the file nameing structure
changed at version 2.  They ARE NOT Compatible.

I think that if original version was 2.x then any version after that is 
compatible.

Just double check everything and remember to put things back afterwards
if you change anything on existing client.


David B. Longo
System Administrator
Health First, Inc.
3300 Fiske Blvd.
Rockledge, FL 32955-4305
PH  321.434.5536
Pager  321.634.8230
Fax:321.434.5509
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/08/06 4:04 PM 
We had an old NT cluster running MSSQL.  At the time it was decommissioned
it had several hundred Gb of backups on tape.  Naturally, after getting rid
of the machine, the owners decided they wanted to keep the active version
of each SQL db backup and I can have the storage back from all the deleted
inactive copies.  How can I do that?  Can I change the name in the options
file of an existing TDP agent to the departed and do a dlete backup from there?



Fred Johanson
ITSM Administrator
University of Chicago
773-702-8464

##
This message is for the named person's use only.  It may 
contain confidential, proprietary, or legally privileged 
information.  No confidentiality or privilege is waived or 
lost by any mistransmission.  If you receive this message 
in error, please immediately delete it and all copies of it 
from your system, destroy any hard copies of it, and notify 
the sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, 
disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message
if you are not the intended recipient.  Health First reserves
the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its
networks.  Any views or opinions expressed in this message
are solely those of the individual sender, except (1) where
the message states such views or opinions are on behalf of 
a particular entity;  and (2) the sender is authorized by 
the entity to give such views or opinions.
##


Re: How to get rid of old TDP backups

2006-06-08 Thread fred johanson

I checked with the machine admin.  The machine was at 3.1.7.2 and the TDP
at 1.1.  So if I can find an old agent, the delete is possible.



At 04:22 PM 6/8/2006 -0400, you wrote:

Basically your answer is yes.  However one thing that has to be right is
the version of TDP on the client.  Was this old client a TDP version prior
to 2?

If so, then you need a version 1.1 or whatever as the file nameing structure
changed at version 2.  They ARE NOT Compatible.

I think that if original version was 2.x then any version after that is
compatible.

Just double check everything and remember to put things back afterwards
if you change anything on existing client.


David B. Longo
System Administrator
Health First, Inc.
3300 Fiske Blvd.
Rockledge, FL 32955-4305
PH  321.434.5536
Pager  321.634.8230
Fax:321.434.5509
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/08/06 4:04 PM 
We had an old NT cluster running MSSQL.  At the time it was decommissioned
it had several hundred Gb of backups on tape.  Naturally, after getting rid
of the machine, the owners decided they wanted to keep the active version
of each SQL db backup and I can have the storage back from all the deleted
inactive copies.  How can I do that?  Can I change the name in the options
file of an existing TDP agent to the departed and do a dlete backup from
there?



Fred Johanson
ITSM Administrator
University of Chicago
773-702-8464

##
This message is for the named person's use only.  It may
contain confidential, proprietary, or legally privileged
information.  No confidentiality or privilege is waived or
lost by any mistransmission.  If you receive this message
in error, please immediately delete it and all copies of it
from your system, destroy any hard copies of it, and notify
the sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use,
disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message
if you are not the intended recipient.  Health First reserves
the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its
networks.  Any views or opinions expressed in this message
are solely those of the individual sender, except (1) where
the message states such views or opinions are on behalf of
a particular entity;  and (2) the sender is authorized by
the entity to give such views or opinions.
##


Fred Johanson
ITSM Administrator
University of Chicago
773-702-8464