Re: volumes in a collocation group?

2009-03-15 Thread James R Owen

I believe Paul meant to say:
Nodes not assigned to a specific collocation group are treated as if *each*
is in *its* own private collocation group (i.e., collocation by node.)
--
jim.o...@yale.edu

Paul Zarnowski wrote:

Nodes not assigned to a specific collocation group are treated as if they
were in their own private collocation group.

At 12:15 AM 3/15/2009, Larry Clark wrote:

Paul,
A question occurred to me..
If you have a subset of nodes defined to collocation groups, but a
number of
nodes not defined to collocation groups, will TSM attempt to avoid
putting
files not in a collocation group on volumes that have collocation groups
nodes...as distinct from your explanation of filling volumes for
collocations group members?

Larry Clark


Re: volumes in a collocation group?

2009-03-15 Thread Nick Laflamme

On Mar 14, 2009, at 10:23 PM, Larry Clark wrote:


What you say is curious..only nodes that are in a
collocation
group should have data on the volumes in that collocation group. At
least
that is my understanding.

Your saying more than one collocation group can store data on the same
volume?

I know for collocation by node that would not be true


Paul already mentioned the scenario in which TSM has to put a a
collocation group member's data on a tape that has data from another
group on it, due to resource constraints. You can get similar results
if a node's collocation group membership changes from one group to
another. In that case, data stays where it is, meaning the tapes now
contain data from two groups on them, even though TSM behaved exactly
as predicted.

I keep wondering if there's a way to mix groups' data on a volume
using MOVE DATA or MOVE NODEDATA, but since neither lets you specify a
target more exactly than a storage group, I haven't seen how yet.


Larry Clark


Nick


Re: volumes in a collocation group?stg

2009-03-15 Thread Alex Paschal
Hi, All.

The critical piece that Larry mentioned is that he's interested in a
copypool.  If your primary pool is collocated by anything, but your
copypool is not collocated at all, then your copypool data will be mixed
up with no regard for collocation groups.

Nick, if you really want to mix data on tapes (I have no idea why you
would want to, but the beautiful thing about TSM is you can do nearly
anything you want), the first way I can think of is to temporarily
reduce MAXSCRATCH (or temporarily disable collocation), set to
Unavailable the volumes you do _not_ wish to write to, then issue move
[node]data.

Alex



Alex Paschal
Storage Solutions Engineer
MSI Systems Integrators


Your Business.  Better.



-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Nick Laflamme
Sent: Sunday, March 15, 2009 5:42 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] volumes in a collocation group?

On Mar 14, 2009, at 10:23 PM, Larry Clark wrote:

 What you say is curious..only nodes that are in a
 collocation
 group should have data on the volumes in that collocation group. At
 least
 that is my understanding.

 Your saying more than one collocation group can store data on the same
 volume?

 I know for collocation by node that would not be true

Paul already mentioned the scenario in which TSM has to put a a
collocation group member's data on a tape that has data from another
group on it, due to resource constraints. You can get similar results
if a node's collocation group membership changes from one group to
another. In that case, data stays where it is, meaning the tapes now
contain data from two groups on them, even though TSM behaved exactly
as predicted.

I keep wondering if there's a way to mix groups' data on a volume
using MOVE DATA or MOVE NODEDATA, but since neither lets you specify a
target more exactly than a storage group, I haven't seen how yet.

 Larry Clark

Nick


This message (including any attachments) is intended only for
the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and
may contain information that is non-public, proprietary,
privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under
applicable law or may constitute as attorney work product.
If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, notify us immediately by telephone and
(i) destroy this message if a facsimile or (ii) delete this message
immediately if this is an electronic communication.

Thank you.


Re: volumes in a collocation group?stg

2009-03-15 Thread Larry Clark

Hi Alex,
Yes, this is related to improving restore times in a DR senario...so these
are offsitevols from a copypool.

Larry Clark
(518) 712-5138 Home Office


- Original Message -
From: Alex Paschal apasc...@msiinet.com
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Sent: Sunday, March 15, 2009 2:37 PM
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] volumes in a collocation group?stg


Hi, All.

The critical piece that Larry mentioned is that he's interested in a
copypool.  If your primary pool is collocated by anything, but your
copypool is not collocated at all, then your copypool data will be mixed
up with no regard for collocation groups.

Nick, if you really want to mix data on tapes (I have no idea why you
would want to, but the beautiful thing about TSM is you can do nearly
anything you want), the first way I can think of is to temporarily
reduce MAXSCRATCH (or temporarily disable collocation), set to
Unavailable the volumes you do _not_ wish to write to, then issue move
[node]data.

Alex



Alex Paschal
Storage Solutions Engineer
MSI Systems Integrators


Your Business.  Better.



-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Nick Laflamme
Sent: Sunday, March 15, 2009 5:42 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] volumes in a collocation group?

On Mar 14, 2009, at 10:23 PM, Larry Clark wrote:


What you say is curious..only nodes that are in a
collocation
group should have data on the volumes in that collocation group. At
least
that is my understanding.

Your saying more than one collocation group can store data on the same
volume?

I know for collocation by node that would not be true


Paul already mentioned the scenario in which TSM has to put a a
collocation group member's data on a tape that has data from another
group on it, due to resource constraints. You can get similar results
if a node's collocation group membership changes from one group to
another. In that case, data stays where it is, meaning the tapes now
contain data from two groups on them, even though TSM behaved exactly
as predicted.

I keep wondering if there's a way to mix groups' data on a volume
using MOVE DATA or MOVE NODEDATA, but since neither lets you specify a
target more exactly than a storage group, I haven't seen how yet.


Larry Clark


Nick


This message (including any attachments) is intended only for
the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and
may contain information that is non-public, proprietary,
privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under
applicable law or may constitute as attorney work product.
If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, notify us immediately by telephone and
(i) destroy this message if a facsimile or (ii) delete this message
immediately if this is an electronic communication.

Thank you.


Re: volumes in a collocation group?stg

2009-03-15 Thread Nick Laflamme

On Mar 15, 2009, at 1:37 PM, Alex Paschal wrote:


Nick, if you really want to mix data on tapes (I have no idea why you
would want to, but the beautiful thing about TSM is you can do nearly
anything you want), the first way I can think of is to temporarily
reduce MAXSCRATCH (or temporarily disable collocation), set to
Unavailable the volumes you do _not_ wish to write to, then issue move
[node]data.


Gee, and I was just trying to warn Larry not to be too sure about
collocation groups never sharing tapes.

Kids these days


Alex


Nick


Sap r/3

2009-03-15 Thread TSTLTDTD
zone some drives to the SAP/R3 server, install tsm.  Make it a libclient of the 
libmgr if you have one.  that's what I see big pharma do.

+--
|This was sent by a579...@yahoo.com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com.
+--