Problems recieving E-Mails.
I haven't recieved any e-mails from usergroup in two days. Is there a problem?. Jimmy Furlong
Re: Problems receiving E-Mails.
Yes, there is a problem, it's called an addiction to the ADSM-listserv. You should seek counseling ;-) Jk. It seems to be working for me, as I got your message. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Jimmy Furlong Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 8:23 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] Problems recieving E-Mails. I haven't recieved any e-mails from usergroup in two days. Is there a problem?. Jimmy Furlong The BCI Email Firewall made the following annotations - *Confidentiality Notice: This E-Mail is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this communication in error, please do not distribute, and delete the original message. Thank you for your compliance. You may contact us at: Blue Cross of Idaho 3000 E. Pine Ave. Meridian, Idaho 83642 1.208.345.4550 -
SV: Problems recieving E-Mails.
Hi Jimmy, TSM is working perfect for all over the world at the moment. ;) Best Regards Christian Svensson Cell: +46-70-325 1577 E-mail: christian.svens...@cristie.se Skype: cristie.christian.svensson Från: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [ads...@vm.marist.edu] f#246;r Jimmy Furlong [jfurl...@dunnes-stores.ie] Skickat: den 13 november 2009 16:22 Till: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Ämne: Problems recieving E-Mails. I haven't recieved any e-mails from usergroup in two days. Is there a problem?. Jimmy Furlong
Re: different cartridge sizes in one library
Yes, and remember to put the smaller drives at the head of the line in the library. That way the smaller tapes can move up to the smaller drives and the larger ones will stay at the bottom. I've noted over time that TSM will use the drives in order from 01 down, and if you have the larger ones at the top then the smaller tapes make take up the drive bays. We currently have a mix of LTO2 and LTO3 drives. See Ya' Howard -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of David McClelland Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 10:14 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] different cartridge sizes in one library There's a link for that: http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/tivihelp/v1r1/topic/com.ibm.it smaix n.doc/anragd55108.htm#mixdevtype In fact, there are a few links - another: http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/pdfs/sg246502.pdf (section 5.11 - Mixed Media Libraries). Briefly, yes, you can do it depending upon library type, media type and media generation backward and forward compatibility. /DMc -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Mehdi Salehi Sent: 11 November 2009 16:01 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] different cartridge sizes in one library Hi, What happens if I mix different generations of LTO cartridges in a tape library? Does it matter from TSM's point of view? Let say a library with LTO4 drives but LTO4 and LTO3 cartridges in a mixture. Thanks No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 9.0.698 / Virus Database: 270.14.55/2490 - Release Date: 11/08/09 19:39:00
TDP for Oracle in AIX - Problem
Dear All, I am trying to configure TDP for Oracle Client on Oracle 9i RAC Database. We have two nodes in the RAC. TSM Server Information OS : AIX V5.3 TSM : V5.5 TSM Client Information OS : AIX V5.3 TSM BA Client API Client : V5.5.0.0 TDP : V5.4.1.0 Oracle : 9i RAC(Two Active Nodes) --- In the RMAN prompt if I configure two channels try to backup. it throws error as Failed to load media management library. RMAN backup database; Starting backup at 13-NOV-09 RMAN-00571: === RMAN-00569: === ERROR MESSAGE STACK FOLLOWS === RMAN-00571: === RMAN-03002: failure of backup command at 11/13/2009 16:07:52 ORA-19554: error allocating device, device type: SBT_TAPE, device name: ORA-27211: Failed to load Media Management Library Additional information: 2 If I configure single channel for one node backup is happening successfully. Is there any specific setting needs to be done for Oracle 9i RAC backup? Best practice to backup the Oracle 9i RAC DB? Regards, Wellington Kirubhakaran M K Senior Engineer - Storage Management Wipro Infotech 88, MG Road, SB Towers, Bangalore - 560001, Karnataka, India Mob: +91 97400 68478 | Ph: +91 80 66292319 Email: wellington.kirubhaka...@wipro.com | Website: www.wipro.com Please do not print this email unless it is absolutely necessary. The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments. WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. www.wipro.com
Re: SV: Problem with Journaling
Hi Thanks for that, some product this TSM. I have an issue with journaling on our file server. Last Tuesday the file server backup started to take 16 hours to run. We have journaling setup on the server to prevent this. On investigation the server seems to be inspecting 1.2 million files and only backing up 5 to 6 thousand which would indicate some problem with journaling on one of the drives. How do I find what caused the journaling to end. 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4952I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Total number of objects inspected: 1,202,293 (SESSION: 197714) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4954I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Total number of objects backed up:6,626 (SESSION: 197714) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4958I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Total number of objects updated: 0 (SESSION: 197714) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4960I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Total number of objects rebound: 0 (SESSION: 197714) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4957I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Total number of objects deleted: 0 (SESSION: 197714) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4970I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Total number of objects expired: 2,785 (SESSION: 197714) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4959I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Total number of objects failed: 4 (SESSION: 197714) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4965I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Total number of subfile objects: 0 (SESSION: 197714) more... (ENTER to continue, 'C' to cancel) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4961I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Total number of bytes transferred: 25.34 GB (SESSION: 197714) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4963I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Data transfer time: 617.46 sec (SESSION: 197714) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4966I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Network data transfer rate:43,048.54 KB/sec (SESSION: 197714) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4967I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Aggregate data transfer rate:372.28 KB/sec (SESSION: 197714) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4968I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Objects compressed by:0% (SESSION: 197714) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4969I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Subfile objects reduced by: 0% (SESSION: 197714) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4964I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Elapsed processing time:19:49:59 (SESSION: 197714) Jimmy Furlong
Re: Problems recieving E-Mails.
Me either Buddy Howeth Computer Operations Specialist Information Systems Pacific Coast Producers Corporate Offices 631 N. Cluff Ave Lodi, CA 95240-0756 (209) 367-8800 - Main# (209) 367-6288 - Computer Room (209) 366-6240 - Alpha Pager Jimmy Furlong jfurl...@dunnes-stores.ie Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU 11/13/2009 07:22 AM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU To ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc Subject [ADSM-L] Problems recieving E-Mails. I haven't recieved any e-mails from usergroup in two days. Is there a problem?. Jimmy Furlong _ Scanned by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs. For more information please visit http://www.ers.ibm.com _
Re: Problems recieving E-Mails.
Hmm ... I just received 8 emails after your note ... See what you started? Many thanks! Bruce -- Bruce T. Harvey UNIX System Administrator, SAIC | DHS/ICE OCIO 1120 Vermont Ave, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20005 202.261.9589 (office) - 202.465.9537 (cell) | harv...@saic-dc.com | -Original Message- | From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] | On Behalf Of Jimmy Furlong | Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 10:23 AM | To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU | Subject: [ADSM-L] Problems recieving E-Mails. | | I haven't recieved any e-mails from usergroup in two days. Is | there a problem?. | | | Jimmy Furlong | This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law or may constitute as attorney work product. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, notify us immediately by telephone and (i) destroy this message if a facsimile or (ii) delete this message immediately if this is an electronic communication. Thank you.
Re: Problems recieving E-Mails.
Check your whitelist/blacklist and spam filtering, first. You can verify your subscription by sending email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with confirm adsm-l as the body of the message. You might be set up for digest form participation. Send the following: query adsm-l to get details on your subscription. See listserv commands on the web. Richard Sims
Re: TDP for Oracle in AIX - Problem
Hi Wellington, Is anything showing up on your TSM Server actlog at the same time? I'm wondering if you have enough mount points allocated for that client node (e.g. UPDATE NODE NODE_TDPO MAXNUMMP=4). Also, for RAC config best practices, check out this useful article from IBM.COM: http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21260228 I'm working on a similar config for a customer at the moment on Linux, works a treat using this method. Rgds, /David Mc London, UK -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Wellington KMK Sent: 13 November 2009 15:48 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] TDP for Oracle in AIX - Problem Dear All, I am trying to configure TDP for Oracle Client on Oracle 9i RAC Database. We have two nodes in the RAC. TSM Server Information OS : AIX V5.3 TSM : V5.5 TSM Client Information OS : AIX V5.3 TSM BA Client API Client : V5.5.0.0 TDP : V5.4.1.0 Oracle : 9i RAC(Two Active Nodes) --- In the RMAN prompt if I configure two channels try to backup. it throws error as Failed to load media management library. RMAN backup database; Starting backup at 13-NOV-09 RMAN-00571: === RMAN-00569: === ERROR MESSAGE STACK FOLLOWS === RMAN-00571: === RMAN-03002: failure of backup command at 11/13/2009 16:07:52 ORA-19554: error allocating device, device type: SBT_TAPE, device name: ORA-27211: Failed to load Media Management Library Additional information: 2 If I configure single channel for one node backup is happening successfully. Is there any specific setting needs to be done for Oracle 9i RAC backup? Best practice to backup the Oracle 9i RAC DB? Regards, Wellington Kirubhakaran M K Senior Engineer - Storage Management Wipro Infotech 88, MG Road, SB Towers, Bangalore - 560001, Karnataka, India Mob: +91 97400 68478 | Ph: +91 80 66292319 Email: wellington.kirubhaka...@wipro.com | Website: www.wipro.com Please do not print this email unless it is absolutely necessary. The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments. WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. www.wipro.com No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 9.0.707 / Virus Database: 270.14.62/2499 - Release Date: 11/12/09 14:33:00
Re: TDP for Oracle in AIX - Problem
It looks you have problem with backup destination (default is used). Have you configured Include/Exclude list for Oracle backups at client side? Management class and copy group at TSM Server site? From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Wellington KMK [wellington.kirubhaka...@wipro.com] Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 6:48 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] TDP for Oracle in AIX - Problem Dear All, I am trying to configure TDP for Oracle Client on Oracle 9i RAC Database. We have two nodes in the RAC. TSM Server Information OS : AIX V5.3 TSM : V5.5 TSM Client Information OS : AIX V5.3 TSM BA Client API Client : V5.5.0.0 TDP : V5.4.1.0 Oracle : 9i RAC(Two Active Nodes) --- In the RMAN prompt if I configure two channels try to backup. it throws error as Failed to load media management library. RMAN backup database; Starting backup at 13-NOV-09 RMAN-00571: === RMAN-00569: === ERROR MESSAGE STACK FOLLOWS === RMAN-00571: === RMAN-03002: failure of backup command at 11/13/2009 16:07:52 ORA-19554: error allocating device, device type: SBT_TAPE, device name: ORA-27211: Failed to load Media Management Library Additional information: 2 If I configure single channel for one node backup is happening successfully. Is there any specific setting needs to be done for Oracle 9i RAC backup? Best practice to backup the Oracle 9i RAC DB? Regards, Wellington Kirubhakaran M K Senior Engineer - Storage Management Wipro Infotech 88, MG Road, SB Towers, Bangalore - 560001, Karnataka, India Mob: +91 97400 68478 | Ph: +91 80 66292319 Email: wellington.kirubhaka...@wipro.com | Website: www.wipro.com Please do not print this email unless it is absolutely necessary. The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments. WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. www.wipro.com Please consider the environment before printing this Email. This email message and any attachments transmitted with it may contain confidential and proprietary information, intended only for the named recipient(s). If you have received this message in error, or if you are not the named recipient(s), please delete this email after notifying the sender immediately. BKME cannot guarantee the integrity of this communication and accepts no liability for any damage caused by this email or its attachments due to viruses, any other defects, interception or unauthorized modification. The information, views, opinions and comments of this message are those of the individual and not necessarily endorsed by BKME.
Re: SV: Problems recieving E-Mails.
Christian, That must be it. Suddenly and simultaneously, all over the world, nobody had any reason to post to ADSM-L. Bound to happen some time, and I am glad to have been here to see it. :-) Seriously, I saw the same thing. The last post from ADSM-L came on Wednesday afternoon, nothing all day Thursday, until Jimmy's post on Friday morning. Kind of odd, but isn't necessarily a problem unless the administrators of the listserv confess to something. Happy Friday, John D. Schneider The Computer Coaching Community, LLC Office: (314) 635-5424 / Toll Free: (866) 796-9226 Cell: (314) 750-8721 Original Message Subject: [ADSM-L] SV: Problems recieving E-Mails. From: Christian Svensson christian.svens...@cristie.se Date: Fri, November 13, 2009 9:26 am To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Hi Jimmy, TSM is working perfect for all over the world at the moment. ;) Best Regards Christian Svensson Cell: +46-70-325 1577 E-mail: christian.svens...@cristie.se Skype: cristie.christian.svensson Från: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [ads...@vm.marist.edu] f#246;r Jimmy Furlong [jfurl...@dunnes-stores.ie] Skickat: den 13 november 2009 16:22 Till: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Ämne: Problems recieving E-Mails. I haven't recieved any e-mails from usergroup in two days. Is there a problem?. Jimmy Furlong
Re: TDP for Oracle in AIX - Problem
I had put the below entry in my dsm.sys file.. INCLUDE /ICROPDB/.../* TKMLMC_ORACLE And also the Management Class and copy group in the TSM Server side also. I had set the maxnummp as 2 set the resourceutilization as 5 in dsm.sys file... If I allocate single channel backup is happening successfully. But, I need to allocate two channels coz it Oracle 9i RAC DB(2 nodes)... Regards, Wellington Kirubhakaran M K Senior Engineer - Storage Management Wipro Infotech 88, MG Road, SB Towers, Bangalore - 560001, Karnataka, India Mob: +91 97400 68478 | Ph: +91 80 66292319 Email: wellington.kirubhaka...@wipro.com | Website: www.wipro.com -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Grigori Solonovitch Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 10:05 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TDP for Oracle in AIX - Problem It looks you have problem with backup destination (default is used). Have you configured Include/Exclude list for Oracle backups at client side? Management class and copy group at TSM Server site? From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Wellington KMK [wellington.kirubhaka...@wipro.com] Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 6:48 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] TDP for Oracle in AIX - Problem Dear All, I am trying to configure TDP for Oracle Client on Oracle 9i RAC Database. We have two nodes in the RAC. TSM Server Information OS : AIX V5.3 TSM : V5.5 TSM Client Information OS : AIX V5.3 TSM BA Client API Client : V5.5.0.0 TDP : V5.4.1.0 Oracle : 9i RAC(Two Active Nodes) --- In the RMAN prompt if I configure two channels try to backup. it throws error as Failed to load media management library. RMAN backup database; Starting backup at 13-NOV-09 RMAN-00571: === RMAN-00569: === ERROR MESSAGE STACK FOLLOWS === RMAN-00571: === RMAN-03002: failure of backup command at 11/13/2009 16:07:52 ORA-19554: error allocating device, device type: SBT_TAPE, device name: ORA-27211: Failed to load Media Management Library Additional information: 2 If I configure single channel for one node backup is happening successfully. Is there any specific setting needs to be done for Oracle 9i RAC backup? Best practice to backup the Oracle 9i RAC DB? Regards, Wellington Kirubhakaran M K Senior Engineer - Storage Management Wipro Infotech 88, MG Road, SB Towers, Bangalore - 560001, Karnataka, India Mob: +91 97400 68478 | Ph: +91 80 66292319 Email: wellington.kirubhaka...@wipro.com | Website: www.wipro.com Please do not print this email unless it is absolutely necessary. The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments. WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. www.wipro.com Please consider the environment before printing this Email. This email message and any attachments transmitted with it may contain confidential and proprietary information, intended only for the named recipient(s). If you have received this message in error, or if you are not the named recipient(s), please delete this email after notifying the sender immediately. BKME cannot guarantee the integrity of this communication and accepts no liability for any damage caused by this email or its attachments due to viruses, any other defects, interception or unauthorized modification. The information, views, opinions and comments of this message are those of the individual and not necessarily endorsed by BKME. Please do not print this email unless it is absolutely necessary. The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments. WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via
Re: SV: Problems recieving E-Mails.
I normally have 10 to 20 each day and the last two days I have only seen 1 or 2 Buddy Howeth Computer Operations Specialist Information Systems Pacific Coast Producers Corporate Offices 631 N. Cluff Ave Lodi, CA 95240-0756 (209) 367-8800 - Main# (209) 367-6288 - Computer Room (209) 366-6240 - Alpha Pager John D. Schneider john.schnei...@computercoachingcommunity.com Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU 11/13/2009 08:45 AM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU To ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc Subject Re: [ADSM-L] SV: Problems recieving E-Mails. Christian, That must be it. Suddenly and simultaneously, all over the world, nobody had any reason to post to ADSM-L. Bound to happen some time, and I am glad to have been here to see it. :-) Seriously, I saw the same thing. The last post from ADSM-L came on Wednesday afternoon, nothing all day Thursday, until Jimmy's post on Friday morning. Kind of odd, but isn't necessarily a problem unless the administrators of the listserv confess to something. Happy Friday, John D. Schneider The Computer Coaching Community, LLC Office: (314) 635-5424 / Toll Free: (866) 796-9226 Cell: (314) 750-8721 Original Message Subject: [ADSM-L] SV: Problems recieving E-Mails. From: Christian Svensson christian.svens...@cristie.se Date: Fri, November 13, 2009 9:26 am To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Hi Jimmy, TSM is working perfect for all over the world at the moment. ;) Best Regards Christian Svensson Cell: +46-70-325 1577 E-mail: christian.svens...@cristie.se Skype: cristie.christian.svensson Från: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [ads...@vm.marist.edu] f#246;r Jimmy Furlong [jfurl...@dunnes-stores.ie] Skickat: den 13 november 2009 16:22 Till: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Ämne: Problems recieving E-Mails. I haven't recieved any e-mails from usergroup in two days. Is there a problem?. Jimmy Furlong _ Scanned by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs. For more information please visit http://www.ers.ibm.com _
Re: TDP for Oracle in AIX - Problem
But, I need to allocate two channels coz it Oracle 9i RAC DB(2 nodes)... That statement doesn't ring true with me - cards on the table, I'm not a DBA (so I may be missing a finer point of your Oracle config), but from working with quite a few RAC DB backups (and restores) using RMAN/TDPO over the years that's something that doesn't match my experiences. I perform a backup from one of the RAC nodes (any one in fact) allocating a single channel if that suits. I can perform a backup of the database from any node in the RAC, and restore it to any node in the RAC. Fundamentally, it's all the same database. I'd think about using two channels when backing up directly to tape (e.g. using the SAN Storage Agent) and wanted to maximise throughput. /David Mc London, UK -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Wellington KMK Sent: 13 November 2009 16:51 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TDP for Oracle in AIX - Problem I had put the below entry in my dsm.sys file.. INCLUDE /ICROPDB/.../* TKMLMC_ORACLE And also the Management Class and copy group in the TSM Server side also. I had set the maxnummp as 2 set the resourceutilization as 5 in dsm.sys file... If I allocate single channel backup is happening successfully. But, I need to allocate two channels coz it Oracle 9i RAC DB(2 nodes)... Regards, Wellington Kirubhakaran M K Senior Engineer - Storage Management Wipro Infotech 88, MG Road, SB Towers, Bangalore - 560001, Karnataka, India Mob: +91 97400 68478 | Ph: +91 80 66292319 Email: wellington.kirubhaka...@wipro.com | Website: www.wipro.com -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Grigori Solonovitch Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 10:05 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TDP for Oracle in AIX - Problem It looks you have problem with backup destination (default is used). Have you configured Include/Exclude list for Oracle backups at client side? Management class and copy group at TSM Server site? From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Wellington KMK [wellington.kirubhaka...@wipro.com] Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 6:48 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] TDP for Oracle in AIX - Problem Dear All, I am trying to configure TDP for Oracle Client on Oracle 9i RAC Database. We have two nodes in the RAC. TSM Server Information OS : AIX V5.3 TSM : V5.5 TSM Client Information OS : AIX V5.3 TSM BA Client API Client : V5.5.0.0 TDP : V5.4.1.0 Oracle : 9i RAC(Two Active Nodes) --- In the RMAN prompt if I configure two channels try to backup. it throws error as Failed to load media management library. RMAN backup database; Starting backup at 13-NOV-09 RMAN-00571: === RMAN-00569: === ERROR MESSAGE STACK FOLLOWS === RMAN-00571: === RMAN-03002: failure of backup command at 11/13/2009 16:07:52 ORA-19554: error allocating device, device type: SBT_TAPE, device name: ORA-27211: Failed to load Media Management Library Additional information: 2 If I configure single channel for one node backup is happening successfully. Is there any specific setting needs to be done for Oracle 9i RAC backup? Best practice to backup the Oracle 9i RAC DB? Regards, Wellington Kirubhakaran M K Senior Engineer - Storage Management Wipro Infotech 88, MG Road, SB Towers, Bangalore - 560001, Karnataka, India Mob: +91 97400 68478 | Ph: +91 80 66292319 Email: wellington.kirubhaka...@wipro.com | Website: www.wipro.com Please do not print this email unless it is absolutely necessary. The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments. WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. www.wipro.com Please consider the environment before printing this Email. This email message and any attachments transmitted with it may contain confidential and proprietary information, intended only for the named recipient(s). If you have received this message in
Problems with 6.1.2.0 on Windows servers
We started pushing out 6.1.2.0 since our security officer read about the security vulnerabilitys in 6.1.x Now we are starting to see rashes of problems on W2K3 (both regular and R2) servers. Yet we have plenty of servers that have upgraded with no issues. ALL of these servers were running just fine with 6.1.0.0 and older versions of the client. Most are manifesting as crashes in dsmagent and/or communications errors (which I know from previous issues I have seen with 6.x, is often a red herring). Yes, we have tried complete un/reinstalls, completely deleted the *:\program files\Tivoli\TSM\directory No luck googling for the obvious (dsmagent cXMLiterator) Anyone seeing similar problems? Excerpts from the various error logs: dsmj.log --- 11/13/2009 09:23:11: ANS2613S A communications protocol error occurred between the web browser and the client.Could not get JDOM tree !!! *** commOpen: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused: connect 11/13/2009 09:23:16: ANS2613S A communications protocol error occurred between the web browser and the client.Could not get JDOM tree !!! *** commOpen: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused: connect 11/13/2009 09:24:47: ANS2613S A communications protocol error occurred between the web browser and the client.Could not get JDOM tree !!! *** commOpen: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused: connect 11/13/2009 09:24:50: ANS2613S A communications protocol error occurred between the web browser and the client.Could not get JDOM tree !!! *** commFlush: java.net.SocketException: Connection reset by peer: socket write error *** commFlush: java.net.SocketException: Connection reset by peer: socket write error *** commOpen: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused: connect 11/13/2009 09:27:24: ANS2610S TCP/IP communications failure between the client and the server machine.*** commFlush: java.net.SocketException: Connection reset by peer: socket write error *** commOpen: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused: connect 11/13/2009 11:30:25: ANS2610S TCP/IP communications failure between the client and the server machine.*** commFlush: java.net.SocketException: Connection reset by peer: socket write error *** commOpen: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused: connect 11/13/2009 11:42:30: ANS2610S TCP/IP communications failure between the client and the server machine.*** commFlush: java.net.SocketException: Connection reset by peer: socket write error *** commOpen: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused: connect *** commFlush: java.net.SocketException: Connection reset by peer: socket write error *** commFlush: java.net.SocketException: Connection reset by peer: socket write error *** commOpen: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused: connect 11/13/2009 11:45:47: ANS2610S TCP/IP communications failure between the client and the server machine. dsmcrash.log --- 2009/11/13 11:43:03 IBM Tivoli Storage Manager Version: 6.1.2.00 Build date: Thu Oct 22 15:11:11 2009 dsmagent.exe caused exception C005 (EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION) at 001B:0053C4A4 Register dump: EAX=0013 EBX= ECX= EDX=009891BA ESI=0471FBB8 EDI=78552B7E EBP=009891CD ESP=0471FA1C EIP=0053C4A4 FLG=00010202 CS=001B DS=0023 SS=0023 ES=0023 FS=003B GS= Crash dump successfully written to file 'D:\Program Files\Tivoli\TSM\baclient\dsmcrash.dmp' Stack Trace: 001B:0053C4A4 (0x00393030 0x333A3531 0x32323A35 0x31003600) dsmagent.exe, cXMLiterator::cXMLiterator()+1234948 bytes tsmstats.ini --- [fileSystemStatistics.\\dominodc3\c$] maxPath=193 totalLocalFiles=30471 totalLocalDirs=3059 maxDirCount=5958 maxDirName=C:\I386 [fileSystemStatistics.\\dominodc3\e$] maxPath=68 totalLocalFiles=24 totalLocalDirs=10 maxDirCount=7 maxDirName=E:\8241623edffcba54df4fdc\amd64 [fileSystemStatistics.\\dominodc3\d$] maxPath=92 totalLocalFiles=423 totalLocalDirs=45 maxDirCount=211 maxDirName=D:\Program Files\Tivoli\TSM\baclient\jvm50\jre\bin dsm.opt -- PASSWORDACCESS GENERATE TCPSERVERADDRESStsmlinux4.ucc.vcu.edu SCHEDLOGR 30 D ERRORLOGR 30 D QUIET TCPClientAddress192.168.20.58
Re: SV: Problem with Journaling
Check how long the Journal service has been up or how big the JDB is. We have a server that needs Journaling restarted about every other month, so we restart it on the weekend about once a month. I am guessing you know that journaling is not active until a backup completes after a restart. Andy Huebner -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Jimmy Furlong Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 9:50 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] SV: Problem with Journaling Hi Thanks for that, some product this TSM. I have an issue with journaling on our file server. Last Tuesday the file server backup started to take 16 hours to run. We have journaling setup on the server to prevent this. On investigation the server seems to be inspecting 1.2 million files and only backing up 5 to 6 thousand which would indicate some problem with journaling on one of the drives. How do I find what caused the journaling to end. 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4952I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Total number of objects inspected: 1,202,293 (SESSION: 197714) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4954I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Total number of objects backed up:6,626 (SESSION: 197714) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4958I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Total number of objects updated: 0 (SESSION: 197714) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4960I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Total number of objects rebound: 0 (SESSION: 197714) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4957I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Total number of objects deleted: 0 (SESSION: 197714) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4970I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Total number of objects expired: 2,785 (SESSION: 197714) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4959I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Total number of objects failed: 4 (SESSION: 197714) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4965I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Total number of subfile objects: 0 (SESSION: 197714) more... (ENTER to continue, 'C' to cancel) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4961I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Total number of bytes transferred: 25.34 GB (SESSION: 197714) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4963I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Data transfer time: 617.46 sec (SESSION: 197714) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4966I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Network data transfer rate:43,048.54 KB/sec (SESSION: 197714) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4967I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Aggregate data transfer rate:372.28 KB/sec (SESSION: 197714) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4968I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Objects compressed by:0% (SESSION: 197714) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4969I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Subfile objects reduced by: 0% (SESSION: 197714) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4964I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Elapsed processing time:19:49:59 (SESSION: 197714) Jimmy Furlong This e-mail (including any attachments) is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not an intended recipient or an authorized representative of an intended recipient, you are prohibited from using, copying or distributing the information in this e-mail or its attachments. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete all copies of this message and any attachments. Thank you.
Re: Problems with 6.1.2.0 on Windows servers
Hello Zoltan, We have started upgrade process from 6.1.0.2 to 6.1.2.0. 5 or 6 servers Win2003R2 have been upgraded already. We faced similar problem on one of them. I have fixed it by: de-install client -- reboot server -- install client -- reboot server -- configure client services by setup wizard (existing dsm.opt). Ithink it is a little bit long process, but what to do? Regards, Grigori From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU [zfor...@vcu.edu] Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 8:19 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] Problems with 6.1.2.0 on Windows servers We started pushing out 6.1.2.0 since our security officer read about the security vulnerabilitys in 6.1.x Now we are starting to see rashes of problems on W2K3 (both regular and R2) servers. Yet we have plenty of servers that have upgraded with no issues. ALL of these servers were running just fine with 6.1.0.0 and older versions of the client. Most are manifesting as crashes in dsmagent and/or communications errors (which I know from previous issues I have seen with 6.x, is often a red herring). Yes, we have tried complete un/reinstalls, completely deleted the *:\program files\Tivoli\TSM\directory No luck googling for the obvious (dsmagent cXMLiterator) Anyone seeing similar problems? Excerpts from the various error logs: dsmj.log --- 11/13/2009 09:23:11: ANS2613S A communications protocol error occurred between the web browser and the client.Could not get JDOM tree !!! *** commOpen: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused: connect 11/13/2009 09:23:16: ANS2613S A communications protocol error occurred between the web browser and the client.Could not get JDOM tree !!! *** commOpen: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused: connect 11/13/2009 09:24:47: ANS2613S A communications protocol error occurred between the web browser and the client.Could not get JDOM tree !!! *** commOpen: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused: connect 11/13/2009 09:24:50: ANS2613S A communications protocol error occurred between the web browser and the client.Could not get JDOM tree !!! *** commFlush: java.net.SocketException: Connection reset by peer: socket write error *** commFlush: java.net.SocketException: Connection reset by peer: socket write error *** commOpen: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused: connect 11/13/2009 09:27:24: ANS2610S TCP/IP communications failure between the client and the server machine.*** commFlush: java.net.SocketException: Connection reset by peer: socket write error *** commOpen: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused: connect 11/13/2009 11:30:25: ANS2610S TCP/IP communications failure between the client and the server machine.*** commFlush: java.net.SocketException: Connection reset by peer: socket write error *** commOpen: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused: connect 11/13/2009 11:42:30: ANS2610S TCP/IP communications failure between the client and the server machine.*** commFlush: java.net.SocketException: Connection reset by peer: socket write error *** commOpen: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused: connect *** commFlush: java.net.SocketException: Connection reset by peer: socket write error *** commFlush: java.net.SocketException: Connection reset by peer: socket write error *** commOpen: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused: connect 11/13/2009 11:45:47: ANS2610S TCP/IP communications failure between the client and the server machine. dsmcrash.log --- 2009/11/13 11:43:03 IBM Tivoli Storage Manager Version: 6.1.2.00 Build date: Thu Oct 22 15:11:11 2009 dsmagent.exe caused exception C005 (EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION) at 001B:0053C4A4 Register dump: EAX=0013 EBX= ECX= EDX=009891BA ESI=0471FBB8 EDI=78552B7E EBP=009891CD ESP=0471FA1C EIP=0053C4A4 FLG=00010202 CS=001B DS=0023 SS=0023 ES=0023 FS=003B GS= Crash dump successfully written to file 'D:\Program Files\Tivoli\TSM\baclient\dsmcrash.dmp' Stack Trace: 001B:0053C4A4 (0x00393030 0x333A3531 0x32323A35 0x31003600) dsmagent.exe, cXMLiterator::cXMLiterator()+1234948 bytes tsmstats.ini --- [fileSystemStatistics.\\dominodc3\c$] maxPath=193 totalLocalFiles=30471 totalLocalDirs=3059 maxDirCount=5958 maxDirName=C:\I386 [fileSystemStatistics.\\dominodc3\e$] maxPath=68 totalLocalFiles=24 totalLocalDirs=10 maxDirCount=7 maxDirName=E:\8241623edffcba54df4fdc\amd64 [fileSystemStatistics.\\dominodc3\d$] maxPath=92 totalLocalFiles=423 totalLocalDirs=45 maxDirCount=211 maxDirName=D:\Program Files\Tivoli\TSM\baclient\jvm50\jre\bin dsm.opt -- PASSWORDACCESS GENERATE TCPSERVERADDRESStsmlinux4.ucc.vcu.edu SCHEDLOGR 30 D ERRORLOGR 30 D QUIET TCPClientAddress192.168.20.58 Please consider the environment before printing this Email. This email message and any attachments transmitted with it may contain confidential
Re: SV: Problem with Journaling
I had this same problem earlier this week. I restarted the journal service and it started journaling again. I'm still looking for the cause. Johnny Huebner,Andy,FORT WORTH,IT andy.hueb...@alconlabs.com 11/13/2009 11:29 AM Check how long the Journal service has been up or how big the JDB is. We have a server that needs Journaling restarted about every other month, so we restart it on the weekend about once a month. I am guessing you know that journaling is not active until a backup completes after a restart. Andy Huebner -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Jimmy Furlong Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 9:50 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] SV: Problem with Journaling Hi Thanks for that, some product this TSM. I have an issue with journaling on our file server. Last Tuesday the file server backup started to take 16 hours to run. We have journaling setup on the server to prevent this. On investigation the server seems to be inspecting 1.2 million files and only backing up 5 to 6 thousand which would indicate some problem with journaling on one of the drives. How do I find what caused the journaling to end. 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4952I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Total number of objects inspected: 1,202,293 (SESSION: 197714) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4954I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Total number of objects backed up:6,626 (SESSION: 197714) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4958I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Total number of objects updated: 0 (SESSION: 197714) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4960I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Total number of objects rebound: 0 (SESSION: 197714) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4957I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Total number of objects deleted: 0 (SESSION: 197714) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4970I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Total number of objects expired: 2,785 (SESSION: 197714) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4959I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Total number of objects failed: 4 (SESSION: 197714) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4965I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Total number of subfile objects: 0 (SESSION: 197714) more... (ENTER to continue, 'C' to cancel) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4961I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Total number of bytes transferred: 25.34 GB (SESSION: 197714) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4963I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Data transfer time: 617.46 sec (SESSION: 197714) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4966I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Network data transfer rate:43,048.54 KB/sec (SESSION: 197714) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4967I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Aggregate data transfer rate:372.28 KB/sec (SESSION: 197714) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4968I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Objects compressed by:0% (SESSION: 197714) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4969I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Subfile objects reduced by: 0% (SESSION: 197714) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4964I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Elapsed processing time:19:49:59 (SESSION: 197714) Jimmy Furlong This e-mail (including any attachments) is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not an intended recipient or an authorized representative of an intended recipient, you are prohibited from using, copying or distributing the information in this e-mail or its attachments. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete all copies of this message and any attachments. Thank you. Individuals who have received this information in error or are not authorized to receive it must promptly return or dispose of the information and notify the sender. Those individuals are hereby notified that they are strictly prohibited from reviewing, forwarding, printing, copying, distributing or using this information in any way.
Re: SV: Problem with Journaling
If it stopped due to an error, there will be entries in the jbberror.log file in the baclient subdirectory. W On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Huebner,Andy,FORT WORTH,IT andy.hueb...@alconlabs.com wrote: Check how long the Journal service has been up or how big the JDB is. We have a server that needs Journaling restarted about every other month, so we restart it on the weekend about once a month. I am guessing you know that journaling is not active until a backup completes after a restart. Andy Huebner -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Jimmy Furlong Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 9:50 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] SV: Problem with Journaling Hi Thanks for that, some product this TSM. I have an issue with journaling on our file server. Last Tuesday the file server backup started to take 16 hours to run. We have journaling setup on the server to prevent this. On investigation the server seems to be inspecting 1.2 million files and only backing up 5 to 6 thousand which would indicate some problem with journaling on one of the drives. How do I find what caused the journaling to end. 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4952I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Total number of objects inspected: 1,202,293 (SESSION: 197714) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4954I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Total number of objects backed up:6,626 (SESSION: 197714) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4958I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Total number of objects updated: 0 (SESSION: 197714) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4960I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Total number of objects rebound: 0 (SESSION: 197714) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4957I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Total number of objects deleted: 0 (SESSION: 197714) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4970I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Total number of objects expired: 2,785 (SESSION: 197714) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4959I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Total number of objects failed: 4 (SESSION: 197714) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4965I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Total number of subfile objects: 0 (SESSION: 197714) more... (ENTER to continue, 'C' to cancel) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4961I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Total number of bytes transferred: 25.34 GB (SESSION: 197714) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4963I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Data transfer time: 617.46 sec (SESSION: 197714) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4966I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Network data transfer rate:43,048.54 KB/sec (SESSION: 197714) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4967I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Aggregate data transfer rate:372.28 KB/sec (SESSION: 197714) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4968I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Objects compressed by:0% (SESSION: 197714) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4969I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Subfile objects reduced by: 0% (SESSION: 197714) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4964I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Elapsed processing time:19:49:59 (SESSION: 197714) Jimmy Furlong This e-mail (including any attachments) is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not an intended recipient or an authorized representative of an intended recipient, you are prohibited from using, copying or distributing the information in this e-mail or its attachments. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete all copies of this message and any attachments. Thank you.
Re: Problems with 6.1.2.0 on Windows servers
Thank you for the suggestion. However, it is ridiculous that this machination would be the answer. I am beginning to wonder if there really is a problem with the communications module/portion of the GUI client. I just did some testing with my workstation GUI and found that even when properly closing the 6.1.0.2 and 6.1.2.0 clients (i.e. FILE - EXIT), the server always registers a severed connection 11/13/2009 2:48:54 PM ANR0480W Session 8995 for node UCC-PC87 (WinNT) terminated - connection with client severed. What gives? From: Grigori Solonovitch g.solonovi...@bkme.com To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Date: 11/13/2009 01:30 PM Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Problems with 6.1.2.0 on Windows servers Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Hello Zoltan, We have started upgrade process from 6.1.0.2 to 6.1.2.0. 5 or 6 servers Win2003R2 have been upgraded already. We faced similar problem on one of them. I have fixed it by: de-install client -- reboot server -- install client -- reboot server -- configure client services by setup wizard (existing dsm.opt). Ithink it is a little bit long process, but what to do? Regards, Grigori From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU [zfor...@vcu.edu] Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 8:19 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] Problems with 6.1.2.0 on Windows servers We started pushing out 6.1.2.0 since our security officer read about the security vulnerabilitys in 6.1.x Now we are starting to see rashes of problems on W2K3 (both regular and R2) servers. Yet we have plenty of servers that have upgraded with no issues. ALL of these servers were running just fine with 6.1.0.0 and older versions of the client. Most are manifesting as crashes in dsmagent and/or communications errors (which I know from previous issues I have seen with 6.x, is often a red herring). Yes, we have tried complete un/reinstalls, completely deleted the *:\program files\Tivoli\TSM\directory No luck googling for the obvious (dsmagent cXMLiterator) Anyone seeing similar problems? Excerpts from the various error logs: dsmj.log --- 11/13/2009 09:23:11: ANS2613S A communications protocol error occurred between the web browser and the client.Could not get JDOM tree !!! *** commOpen: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused: connect 11/13/2009 09:23:16: ANS2613S A communications protocol error occurred between the web browser and the client.Could not get JDOM tree !!! *** commOpen: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused: connect 11/13/2009 09:24:47: ANS2613S A communications protocol error occurred between the web browser and the client.Could not get JDOM tree !!! *** commOpen: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused: connect 11/13/2009 09:24:50: ANS2613S A communications protocol error occurred between the web browser and the client.Could not get JDOM tree !!! *** commFlush: java.net.SocketException: Connection reset by peer: socket write error *** commFlush: java.net.SocketException: Connection reset by peer: socket write error *** commOpen: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused: connect 11/13/2009 09:27:24: ANS2610S TCP/IP communications failure between the client and the server machine.*** commFlush: java.net.SocketException: Connection reset by peer: socket write error *** commOpen: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused: connect 11/13/2009 11:30:25: ANS2610S TCP/IP communications failure between the client and the server machine.*** commFlush: java.net.SocketException: Connection reset by peer: socket write error *** commOpen: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused: connect 11/13/2009 11:42:30: ANS2610S TCP/IP communications failure between the client and the server machine.*** commFlush: java.net.SocketException: Connection reset by peer: socket write error *** commOpen: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused: connect *** commFlush: java.net.SocketException: Connection reset by peer: socket write error *** commFlush: java.net.SocketException: Connection reset by peer: socket write error *** commOpen: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused: connect 11/13/2009 11:45:47: ANS2610S TCP/IP communications failure between the client and the server machine. dsmcrash.log --- 2009/11/13 11:43:03 IBM Tivoli Storage Manager Version: 6.1.2.00 Build date: Thu Oct 22 15:11:11 2009 dsmagent.exe caused exception C005 (EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION) at 001B:0053C4A4 Register dump: EAX=0013 EBX= ECX= EDX=009891BA ESI=0471FBB8 EDI=78552B7E EBP=009891CD ESP=0471FA1C EIP=0053C4A4 FLG=00010202 CS=001B DS=0023 SS=0023 ES=0023 FS=003B GS= Crash dump successfully written to file 'D:\Program Files\Tivoli\TSM\baclient\dsmcrash.dmp' Stack Trace: 001B:0053C4A4 (0x00393030 0x333A3531 0x32323A35 0x31003600) dsmagent.exe, cXMLiterator::cXMLiterator()+1234948 bytes tsmstats.ini
Fw: SV: Problem with Journaling
In depth answers to most of these questions in the updated JBB FAQ tech note If the link below doesn't work for some reason a google search of JBB FAQ should find it. http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=203context=SWI00context=SWJ00context=SWK00q1=Journal+Based+Backupuid=swg21155524loc=en_UScs=utf-8lang=en+en Pete Tanenhaus Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development email: tanen...@us.ibm.com tieline: 320.8778, external: 607.754.4213 Those who refuse to challenge authority are condemned to conform to it -- Forwarded by Pete Tanenhaus/San Jose/IBM on 11/13/2009 03:01 PM --- Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Sent by:ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc: Subject:Re: SV: Problem with Journaling If it stopped due to an error, there will be entries in the jbberror.log file in the baclient subdirectory. W On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Huebner,Andy,FORT WORTH,IT andy.hueb...@alconlabs.com wrote: Check how long the Journal service has been up or how big the JDB is. We have a server that needs Journaling restarted about every other month, so we restart it on the weekend about once a month. I am guessing you know that journaling is not active until a backup completes after a restart. Andy Huebner -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Jimmy Furlong Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 9:50 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] SV: Problem with Journaling Hi Thanks for that, some product this TSM. I have an issue with journaling on our file server. Last Tuesday the file server backup started to take 16 hours to run. We have journaling setup on the server to prevent this. On investigation the server seems to be inspecting 1.2 million files and only backing up 5 to 6 thousand which would indicate some problem with journaling on one of the drives. How do I find what caused the journaling to end. 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4952I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Total number of objects inspected: 1,202,293 (SESSION: 197714) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4954I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Total number of objects backed up:6,626 (SESSION: 197714) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4958I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Total number of objects updated: 0 (SESSION: 197714) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4960I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Total number of objects rebound: 0 (SESSION: 197714) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4957I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Total number of objects deleted: 0 (SESSION: 197714) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4970I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Total number of objects expired: 2,785 (SESSION: 197714) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4959I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Total number of objects failed: 4 (SESSION: 197714) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4965I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Total number of subfile objects: 0 (SESSION: 197714) more... (ENTER to continue, 'C' to cancel) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4961I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Total number of bytes transferred: 25.34 GB (SESSION: 197714) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4963I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Data transfer time: 617.46 sec (SESSION: 197714) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4966I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Network data transfer rate:43,048.54 KB/sec (SESSION: 197714) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4967I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Aggregate data transfer rate:372.28 KB/sec (SESSION: 197714) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4968I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Objects compressed by:0% (SESSION: 197714) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4969I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Subfile objects reduced by: 0% (SESSION: 197714) 11/12/2009 15:52:46 ANE4964I (Session: 197714, Node: DSPRWC) Elapsed processing time:19:49:59 (SESSION: 197714) Jimmy Furlong This e-mail (including any attachments) is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not an intended recipient or an authorized representative of an intended recipient, you are prohibited from using, copying or distributing the information in this e-mail or its attachments. If you have
Re: TDP for Oracle in AIX - Problem
-Wellington Kirubhakaran M K wrote: - I had put the below entry in my dsm.sys file.. INCLUDE /ICROPDB/.../* TKMLMC_ORACLE And also the Management Class and copy group in the TSM Server side also. I had set the maxnummp as 2 set the resourceutilization as 5 in dsm.sys file... If I allocate single channel backup is happening successfully. But, I need to allocate two channels coz it Oracle 9i RAC DB(2 nodes)... My site has a number of HP-UX Oracle servers. We used to send incoming backups to storage pools composed of sequential disk volumes (which TSM treats like tape volumes with respect to mount points and mount point limits), and data for Oracle restores is almost always read from tape. We started off setting maxnummp equal to the number of backup or restore streams TDP was configured for, and got lots of sessions failing with messages indicating that the client was trying to use too many mount points. We eliminated the problem by setting maxnummp to twice the number of streams TDP was configured for. We have never figured out why the extra mount points are needed.
Re: different cartridge sizes in one library
I do not mean different drives, but different cartridges of different LTO generations. e.g a library has two LTO4 drives and mix of LTO4 and LTO3 cartridges.
tape library for TSM
What are the essentials of a tape library to fully work with TSM? - enough tape drives - barcode reader - cartridge barcode labels - FC connection for LAN-free ...?
