Running makedamaged on an object when the storagepool doesn'texist??
Hello I've got some objects in my database that points to a volume that does not exist anymore but TSM still think it does and that gives me a lot of errors when I'm running expiration An audit of the DB would solve these problem but the db is too big to do that in a reasonable time. An example: tsm: PROD-ADSM3show bfo 0 10554579 Bitfile Object: 0.10554579 Active **Archival Bitfile Entry Bitfile Type: PRIMARY Storage Format: 9 Bitfile Size: 0.46143257 Number of Segments: 1 Storage Pool ID: 12 Volume ID: 88522 Volume Name: 007667 **Archival Bitfile Entry Bitfile Type: COPY Storage Format: 9 Bitfile Size: 0.46143257 Number of Segments: 1 Storage Pool ID: -3 Volume ID: 38548 Volume Name: *unknown* **Archival Bitfile Entry Bitfile Type: COPY Storage Format: 9 Bitfile Size: 0.46143257 Number of Segments: 1 Storage Pool ID: -4 Volume ID: 75933 Volume Name: 006267 The pool -3 is an old copypool (bunkercopy), which doesn't exist anymore. Trying to run makedamaged: tsm: PROD-ADSM3makedamaged 0 10554579 ANR2022E MAKEDAMAGED: One or more parameters are missing. ANS8001I Return code 3. tsm: PROD-ADSM3makedamaged -3 0 10554579 Pool -3 is not Defined. ANS8001I Return code 11. tsm: PROD-ADSM3makedamaged bunkercopy 0 10554579 Pool BUNKERCOPY is not Defined. ANS8001I Return code 11. Makedamaged command wants you to specify the storagepool for the object, does anyone know another way to mark the object damaged? There's not so much documentation about makedamaged Med vänlig hälsning Niklas Lundström Niklas Lundström Storage Administrator Swedbank AB (publ) 105 34 Stockholm Telefon: +46 (0)8 5859 5164 Mobil: +46 (0)70 24 76 345 Vi ber dig lägga märke till att detta e-postmeddelande kan innehålla konfidentiell information. Om du felaktigt blivit mottagare av detta meddelande ber vi dig informera avsändaren om felet genom att använda svara-funktionen. Vi ber dig också att radera e-postmeddelandet utan att skicka det vidare eller kopiera det. Trots att vi intygar att e-postmeddelandet och eventuella bilagor inte innehåller virus och andra fel som kan påverka datorn eller IT-systemet där det mottages och läses, öppnas det på mottagarens eget ansvar. Vi tar inte på oss något ansvar för förlust eller skada, som har uppstått i samband med att e-postmeddelandet mottagits och använts. _ Please note that this message may contain confidential information. If you have received this message by mistake, please inform the sender of the mistake by sending a reply, then delete the message from your system without making, distributing or retaining any copies of it. Although we believe that the message and any attachment are free from viruses and other errors that might affect the computer or IT system where it is received and read, the recipient opens the message at his or her own risk. We assume no responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the receipt or use of this message.
TSM administration difference between z/OS and open systems
Hi, How much mainframe knowledge is necessary for an experienced TSM admin for open systems to maintain TSM server for z/OS? I mean using Unix System Services (USS) and the web-based administration center. thanks so much
SV: Running makedamaged on an object when the storagepool doesn'texist??
Hi Niklas, What's happening if you put the tape as destroyed? and do a restore media to reproduce that data so you can expire the information as normal? Best Regards Christian Svensson Cell: +46-70-325 1577 E-mail: christian.svens...@cristie.se Skype: cristie.christian.svensson Supported Platform for CPU2TSM:: http://www.cristie.se/cpu2tsm-supported-platforms Från: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [ads...@vm.marist.edu] f#246;r Niklas Lundström [niklas.lundst...@swedbank.se] Skickat: den 1 februari 2010 09:33 Till: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Ämne: Running makedamaged on an object when the storagepool doesn'texist?? Hello I've got some objects in my database that points to a volume that does not exist anymore but TSM still think it does and that gives me a lot of errors when I'm running expiration An audit of the DB would solve these problem but the db is too big to do that in a reasonable time. An example: tsm: PROD-ADSM3show bfo 0 10554579 Bitfile Object: 0.10554579 Active **Archival Bitfile Entry Bitfile Type: PRIMARY Storage Format: 9 Bitfile Size: 0.46143257 Number of Segments: 1 Storage Pool ID: 12 Volume ID: 88522 Volume Name: 007667 **Archival Bitfile Entry Bitfile Type: COPY Storage Format: 9 Bitfile Size: 0.46143257 Number of Segments: 1 Storage Pool ID: -3 Volume ID: 38548 Volume Name: *unknown* **Archival Bitfile Entry Bitfile Type: COPY Storage Format: 9 Bitfile Size: 0.46143257 Number of Segments: 1 Storage Pool ID: -4 Volume ID: 75933 Volume Name: 006267 The pool -3 is an old copypool (bunkercopy), which doesn't exist anymore. Trying to run makedamaged: tsm: PROD-ADSM3makedamaged 0 10554579 ANR2022E MAKEDAMAGED: One or more parameters are missing. ANS8001I Return code 3. tsm: PROD-ADSM3makedamaged -3 0 10554579 Pool -3 is not Defined. ANS8001I Return code 11. tsm: PROD-ADSM3makedamaged bunkercopy 0 10554579 Pool BUNKERCOPY is not Defined. ANS8001I Return code 11. Makedamaged command wants you to specify the storagepool for the object, does anyone know another way to mark the object damaged? There's not so much documentation about makedamaged Med vänlig hälsning Niklas Lundström Niklas Lundström Storage Administrator Swedbank AB (publ) 105 34 Stockholm Telefon: +46 (0)8 5859 5164 Mobil: +46 (0)70 24 76 345 Vi ber dig lägga märke till att detta e-postmeddelande kan innehålla konfidentiell information. Om du felaktigt blivit mottagare av detta meddelande ber vi dig informera avsändaren om felet genom att använda svara-funktionen. Vi ber dig också att radera e-postmeddelandet utan att skicka det vidare eller kopiera det. Trots att vi intygar att e-postmeddelandet och eventuella bilagor inte innehåller virus och andra fel som kan påverka datorn eller IT-systemet där det mottages och läses, öppnas det på mottagarens eget ansvar. Vi tar inte på oss något ansvar för förlust eller skada, som har uppstått i samband med att e-postmeddelandet mottagits och använts. _ Please note that this message may contain confidential information. If you have received this message by mistake, please inform the sender of the mistake by sending a reply, then delete the message from your system without making, distributing or retaining any copies of it. Although we believe that the message and any attachment are free from viruses and other errors that might affect the computer or IT system where it is received and read, the recipient opens the message at his or her own risk. We assume no responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the receipt or use of this message.
SV: [ADSM-L] TSM administration difference between z/OS and open systems
Hello TSM 5.5 was the last version for MVS. Are you meaning that you are running a TSM server in USS? Is that even possible, I thought that the only way to run TSM 6.1 on a mainframe was to use a Linux LPAR and use z-Linux Regards Niklas -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] För Mehdi Salehi Skickat: den 1 februari 2010 10:49 Till: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Ämne: [ADSM-L] TSM administration difference between z/OS and open systems Hi, How much mainframe knowledge is necessary for an experienced TSM admin for open systems to maintain TSM server for z/OS? I mean using Unix System Services (USS) and the web-based administration center. thanks so much
Re: SV: [ADSM-L] TSM administration difference between z/OS and open systems
I mean TSM 5.5 for z/OS
SV: [ADSM-L] SV: [ADSM-L] TSM administration difference between z/OS and open systems
7cfcaf1d35809d4491c6bc48615ced2c2827612...@fspas01ev012.fspa.myntet.se7 2de89f41002010244v30bda147g958e690f99414...@mail.gmail.com In-Reply-To: 72de89f41002010244v30bda147g958e690f99414...@mail.gmail.com Accept-Language: sv-SE Content-Language: sv-SE X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: sv-SE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-imss-version: 2.035 X-imss-result: Passed X-imss-scores: Clean:99.9 C:2 M:3 S:5 R:5 X-imss-settings: Baseline:1 C:2 M:1 S:1 R:1 (0. 0.) X-Barracuda-Connect: mail2.swedbank.se[164.10.46.102] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265022709 X-Barracuda-Encrypted: RC4-SHA X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam Virus Firewall at marist.edu We run TSM 5.5 on MVS, USS has nothing to do with it. When I started working with TSM I had no knowledge about z/OS and you reall= y don't need it. Just learn how to create and format the data sets that TSM is using, so you= don't have to go to the system programmer=20 everytime you need a new db volume. But since the MVS version will be unsupported in 2012, everyone who's using= it should be planning for a migration -Ursprungligt meddelande- Fr=E5n: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] F=F6r Mehdi S= alehi Skickat: den 1 februari 2010 11:44 Till: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU =C4mne: Re: [ADSM-L] SV: [ADSM-L] TSM administration difference between z/O= S and open systems I mean TSM 5.5 for z/OS
Re: Running makedamaged on an object when the storagepool doesn'texist??
On Feb 1, 2010, at 3:33 AM, Niklas Lundström wrote: I've got some objects in my database that points to a volume that does not exist anymore but TSM still think it does... The obvious question: What happened when you attempted Delete Volume Discarddata=yes ?
SV: [ADSM-L] SV: Running makedamaged on an object when thestoragepool doesn'texist??
All the volumes from the original copypool are already deleted and the pool is removed , but TSM still have references to it. Storage Pool ID: -3 Volume ID: 38548 Volume Name: *unknown* The volume_id is the internal volumename in TSM, it has nothing to to with the tape-label. So since the Volume Name is *unknown* I can't do anything with it.. That's why I want to mark the object as damaged, but themakedamaged command requires the storagepool-name, and that name doesn't exist anymore. The best thing would be if there were a deleteobject command in which you could enter the pool-id -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] För Christian Svensson Skickat: den 1 februari 2010 11:06 Till: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Ämne: [ADSM-L] SV: Running makedamaged on an object when the storagepool doesn'texist?? Hi Niklas, What's happening if you put the tape as destroyed? and do a restore media to reproduce that data so you can expire the information as normal? Best Regards Christian Svensson Cell: +46-70-325 1577 E-mail: christian.svens...@cristie.se Skype: cristie.christian.svensson Supported Platform for CPU2TSM:: http://www.cristie.se/cpu2tsm-supported-platforms Från: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [ads...@vm.marist.edu] f#246;r Niklas Lundström [niklas.lundst...@swedbank.se] Skickat: den 1 februari 2010 09:33 Till: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Ämne: Running makedamaged on an object when the storagepool doesn'texist?? Hello I've got some objects in my database that points to a volume that does not exist anymore but TSM still think it does and that gives me a lot of errors when I'm running expiration An audit of the DB would solve these problem but the db is too big to do that in a reasonable time. An example: tsm: PROD-ADSM3show bfo 0 10554579 Bitfile Object: 0.10554579 Active **Archival Bitfile Entry Bitfile Type: PRIMARY Storage Format: 9 Bitfile Size: 0.46143257 Number of Segments: 1 Storage Pool ID: 12 Volume ID: 88522 Volume Name: 007667 **Archival Bitfile Entry Bitfile Type: COPY Storage Format: 9 Bitfile Size: 0.46143257 Number of Segments: 1 Storage Pool ID: -3 Volume ID: 38548 Volume Name: *unknown* **Archival Bitfile Entry Bitfile Type: COPY Storage Format: 9 Bitfile Size: 0.46143257 Number of Segments: 1 Storage Pool ID: -4 Volume ID: 75933 Volume Name: 006267 The pool -3 is an old copypool (bunkercopy), which doesn't exist anymore. Trying to run makedamaged: tsm: PROD-ADSM3makedamaged 0 10554579 ANR2022E MAKEDAMAGED: One or more parameters are missing. ANS8001I Return code 3. tsm: PROD-ADSM3makedamaged -3 0 10554579 Pool -3 is not Defined. ANS8001I Return code 11. tsm: PROD-ADSM3makedamaged bunkercopy 0 10554579 Pool BUNKERCOPY is not Defined. ANS8001I Return code 11. Makedamaged command wants you to specify the storagepool for the object, does anyone know another way to mark the object damaged? There's not so much documentation about makedamaged Med vänlig hälsning Niklas Lundström Niklas Lundström Storage Administrator Swedbank AB (publ) 105 34 Stockholm Telefon: +46 (0)8 5859 5164 Mobil: +46 (0)70 24 76 345 Vi ber dig lägga märke till att detta e-postmeddelande kan innehålla konfidentiell information. Om du felaktigt blivit mottagare av detta meddelande ber vi dig informera avsändaren om felet genom att använda svara-funktionen. Vi ber dig också att radera e-postmeddelandet utan att skicka det vidare eller kopiera det. Trots att vi intygar att e-postmeddelandet och eventuella bilagor inte innehåller virus och andra fel som kan påverka datorn eller IT-systemet där det mottages och läses, öppnas det på mottagarens eget ansvar. Vi tar inte på oss något ansvar för förlust eller skada, som har uppstått i samband med att e-postmeddelandet mottagits och använts. _ Please note that this message may contain confidential information. If you have received this message by mistake, please inform the sender of the mistake by sending a reply, then delete the message from your system without making, distributing or retaining any copies of it. Although we believe that the message and any attachment are free from viruses and other errors that might affect the computer or IT system where it is received and read, the recipient opens the message at his or her own risk. We assume no responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the receipt or use of this message.
SV: [ADSM-L] Running makedamaged on an object when the storagepool doesn'texist??
I don't think there were any problems deleting the volume, I got rid of it and could remove the whole copypool. -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] För Richard Sims Skickat: den 1 februari 2010 13:28 Till: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Ämne: Re: [ADSM-L] Running makedamaged on an object when the storagepool doesn'texist?? On Feb 1, 2010, at 3:33 AM, Niklas Lundström wrote: I've got some objects in my database that points to a volume that does not exist anymore but TSM still think it does... The obvious question: What happened when you attempted Delete Volume Discarddata=yes ?
DSMADMC running from Target server?
Could someone tell me if I am using incorrect syntax. I am trying to run dsmadmc from my target server in order to query some volumes that may have potential problems. I was getting the error ANS8019E before I added the (-) in front of id and password. After adding (-) I dont get an error, but it does not establish a connection with the correct server. It establishes a connection with my source server. I am using the following and running from the baclient directory. dsmadmc -server=10.10.1.xxx -id=admin -password=admin 10.10.1.xxx is my target server. The command is being ran from this server as well. My output establishes a connection with the source. Anyone have any thoughts or ideas as to what I could be doing wrong? Eric Vaughn Technical Administrator Stevenson University Office (443)334-2301 evau...@stevenson.edu
ORACLE Encryption
We register the TDPO as a distinct client. Most are on various flavors of UNIX. So where do we put the include.encrypt. Does it go in the dsmi_opt file or an incleexcl file referenced in that file? The manual isn't very clear. Fred Johanson TSM Administrator University of Chicago 773-702-8464
Re: DSMADMC running from Target server?
Eric, The -server option is just a pointer to a TSM stanza instance in your DSM.SYS configuration file. It is there that you will have to provide the TCPSERVERADRESS for your target server ... Cheers. Arnaud ** Corporate IT Systems Datacenter Responsible Panalpina Management Ltd., Basle, Switzerland, CIT Department Viadukstrasse 42, P.O. Box 4002 Basel/CH Phone: +41 (61) 226 11 11, FAX: +41 (61) 226 17 01 Direct: +41 (61) 226 19 78 e-mail: arnaud.br...@panalpina.com ** -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Eric Vaughn Sent: lundi 1 février 2010 15:39 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: DSMADMC running from Target server? Could someone tell me if I am using incorrect syntax. I am trying to run dsmadmc from my target server in order to query some volumes that may have potential problems. I was getting the error ANS8019E before I added the (-) in front of id and password. After adding (-) I dont get an error, but it does not establish a connection with the correct server. It establishes a connection with my source server. I am using the following and running from the baclient directory. dsmadmc -server=10.10.1.xxx -id=admin -password=admin 10.10.1.xxx is my target server. The command is being ran from this server as well. My output establishes a connection with the source. Anyone have any thoughts or ideas as to what I could be doing wrong? Eric Vaughn Technical Administrator Stevenson University Office (443)334-2301 evau...@stevenson.edu
Re: DSMADMC running from Target server?
I figured out the issue instead of server used tcps and it worked. Thanks, Eric PAC Brion Arnaud arnaud.br...@panalpina.com 2/1/2010 9:47 AM Eric, The -server option is just a pointer to a TSM stanza instance in your DSM.SYS configuration file. It is there that you will have to provide the TCPSERVERADRESS for your target server ... Cheers. Arnaud ** Corporate IT Systems Datacenter Responsible Panalpina Management Ltd., Basle, Switzerland, CIT Department Viadukstrasse 42, P.O. Box 4002 Basel/CH Phone: +41 (61) 226 11 11, FAX: +41 (61) 226 17 01 Direct: +41 (61) 226 19 78 e-mail: arnaud.br...@panalpina.com ** -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Eric Vaughn Sent: lundi 1 février 2010 15:39 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: DSMADMC running from Target server? Could someone tell me if I am using incorrect syntax. I am trying to run dsmadmc from my target server in order to query some volumes that may have potential problems. I was getting the error ANS8019E before I added the (-) in front of id and password. After adding (-) I dont get an error, but it does not establish a connection with the correct server. It establishes a connection with my source server. I am using the following and running from the baclient directory. dsmadmc -server=10.10.1.xxx -id=admin -password=admin 10.10.1.xxx is my target server. The command is being ran from this server as well. My output establishes a connection with the source. Anyone have any thoughts or ideas as to what I could be doing wrong? Eric Vaughn Technical Administrator Stevenson University Office (443)334-2301 evau...@stevenson.edu
Re: TSM Clients on Red Hat Enterprise Linux
Hi Zoltan, No real issues to date yet. Most of our TSM problems have been due to lack of access to the clients or the firewall settings not being correct (both of these are the responsibilities other teams). I was really just looking for some suggestions for making sure the clients are running effectively and smootly. But Richard Sims pointed me in the direction of the ADSM-L archives (which I did not know about) and that's proven really helpful already (only had a browse through today.). Thanks, Werner Werner Korsten IS Graduate Trainee http://www.standardlife.com -- Date:Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:45:00 -0500 From:Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU zfor...@vcu.edu Subject: Re: TSM Clients on Red Hat Enterprise Linux What your issues/problems?. We backup hundreds of Linux, Solaris, Netware, Windows, IRIX and Mac clients daily. Our Linux of choice is exclusively RedHat with versions/kernels from 2.4.2-28 (client 5.2) up to 2.6.9-89 (client 6.1). Date:Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:23:18 + From:Werner Korsten werner_kors...@standardlife.com Subject: TSM Clients on Red Hat Enterprise Linux Hello all, The business is in the process of building a number of new Linux clients, and we will then need to back these up. We are new to Linux, most of the estate that we backup are Windows, AIX Netware clients. I've been able to install the TSM clients on the a few test servers and these have been backing up without many issues presenting themselves. We currently use TSM Server 5.5.2.1, and TSM client 5.5.1.4 installed on Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.3. Is anyone else running TSM Clients on Red Hat? I'm looking for suggestions so we can optimise the option files for these new servers. I've had a look at a performance redbook IBM have previously pointed me to, but it doesn't contain anything specific for Linux. IBM have advised there doesn't seem to be too many problems with performance on Linux, though I would still like to make sure we have it as streamlined as possible. Any ideas? Thanks, Werner Werner Korsten IS Graduate Trainee http://www.standardlife.com This e-mail is confidential and, if you are not the intended recipient, please return it to us and do not retain or disclose it. We filter and monitor e-mails in order to protect our system and the integrity, confidentiality and availability of e-mails. We cannot guarantee that e-mails are risk free and are not responsible for any related damage or unauthorised alteration of e-mails by third parties after sending. For more information on Standard Life group, visit our website http://www.standardlife.com/ Standard Life plc (SC286832), Standard Life Assurance Limited* (SC286833) and Standard Life Employee Services Limited (SC271355) are all registered in Scotland at Standard Life House, 30 Lothian Road, Edinburgh EH1 2DH. *Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. 0131 225 2552. Calls may be recorded/monitored. Standard Life group includes Standard Life plc and its subsidiaries. Please consider the environment. Think - before you print.
Re: ORACLE Encryption
Hi Fred, To encrypt all files, add the following options to dsm.sys ENABLECLIENTENCRYPTKEY YES include.encrypt /.../* Regards, Mark From: Fred Johanson f...@uchicago.edu To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu Date: 02/01/2010 06:42 AM Subject:[ADSM-L] ORACLE Encryption We register the TDPO as a distinct client. Most are on various flavors of UNIX. So where do we put the include.encrypt. Does it go in the dsmi_opt file or an incleexcl file referenced in that file? The manual isn't very clear. Fred Johanson TSM Administrator University of Chicago 773-702-8464
Re: ?anyone using TSM to backup Panasus PanFS?
You could attach the TSM server to the clustered filesystem and allow it to perform the backup from its own client. This might get you better bandwidth if it's done properly. MEMORYEFFICIENT YES will scan one directory at a time per producer thread. This keeps from eating up all system memory, at the expense of some scan speed. Memory usage is 400-1200 bytes per file in the list to be backed up. RESOURCEUTIL 10 is the limit and gets you only 4-6 producers. If you have good bandwidth, and a large number of execution threads, it may be beneficial to run parallel backups. Parallel backups can be used to spread the workload across more threads and/or more systems. virtualnodename or asnode can be used if necessary. VIRTUALMOUNTPOINT can be used to get around scanning areas which should not be backed up rather than excluding those areas. To prevent retransmits, you could perform backups of a replica or a snapshot. Incremental by Date is valuable for your busy days. It won't expire files, but it saves a bunch of time scanning. Limitations for path/filename depth: AIX HP-UX Solaris: File_space_name 1024 Path_name or directory_name 1023 File_name 256 Linux File_space_name 1024 Path_name or directory_name768 File_name 256 Windows XP/2000/2003 File_space_name 1024 Path_name or directory_name248 File_name 248 With friendly regards, Josh-D. S. Davis From: James R Owen jim.o...@yale.edu To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Sent: Tue, January 26, 2010 5:09:53 PM Subject: [ADSM-L] ?anyone using TSM to backup Panasus PanFS? Yale uses Panasus PanFS, a massive parallel storage system, to store research data generated from HPC clusters. In considering feasibility to backup PanFS using TSM, we are concerned about whether TSM is appropriate to backup and restore: 1. very large volumes, 2. deep subdirectory hierarchy with 100's to 1000's of sublevels, 3. large numbers of files within individual subdirectories, 4. much larger numbers of files within each directory hierarchy. Are there effective maximum limits for any of the above, beyond which TSM becomes inappropriate to effectively perform backups and restores? Please advise about the feasibility and any configuration recommendation(s) to maximize PanFS backup and restore efficiency using TSM. Thanks for your help. -- jim.o...@yale.edu (w#203.432.6693, c#203.494.9201, h#203.387.3030)
Re: TSM administration difference between z/OS and open systems
Learn JCL and batch scheduling. Create linear VSAM files for all TSM pools. Each TSM pool file will be limited to 4GB on a 3390 volume. Forget everything you learn about TSM library manager, most mainframes will have RMM or equivalent to manage the Tape library. Cannot use LTO or DLT tape drives. Can only use enterprise IBM or STK tape drives. Do not use VTS for tape pool. Use the message automation package to your advantage. TSM server does not use USS. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Mehdi Salehi Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 1:49 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: TSM administration difference between z/OS and open systems Hi, How much mainframe knowledge is necessary for an experienced TSM admin for open systems to maintain TSM server for z/OS? I mean using Unix System Services (USS) and the web-based administration center. thanks so much
Re: TSM Clients on Red Hat Enterprise Linux
Nothing specific to Linux or Redhat. General things: If your TSM server is *NIX, you can increase your TCPWINdowsize to 262144 on the server and use a TCPBUFfersize of 131072. Older Windows will have problems with anything over 63. Enabling jumbo frames also helps with CPU load from network transmission. TXNBytelimit and TXNGroupmax can be cranked up to improve the transmit performance. From: Werner Korsten werner_kors...@standardlife.com To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 10:23:18 AM Subject: [ADSM-L] TSM Clients on Red Hat Enterprise Linux Hello all, The business is in the process of building a number of new Linux clients, and we will then need to back these up. We are new to Linux, most of the estate that we backup are Windows, AIX Netware clients. I've been able to install the TSM clients on the a few test servers and these have been backing up without many issues presenting themselves. We currently use TSM Server 5.5.2.1, and TSM client 5.5.1.4 installed on Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.3. Is anyone else running TSM Clients on Red Hat? I'm looking for suggestions so we can optimise the option files for these new servers. I've had a look at a performance redbook IBM have previously pointed me to, but it doesn't contain anything specific for Linux. IBM have advised there doesn't seem to be too many problems with performance on Linux, though I would still like to make sure we have it as streamlined as possible. Any ideas? Thanks, Werner Werner Korsten IS Graduate Trainee http://www.standardlife.com This e-mail is confidential and, if you are not the intended recipient, please return it to us and do not retain or disclose it. We filter and monitor e-mails in order to protect our system and the integrity, confidentiality and availability of e-mails. We cannot guarantee that e-mails are risk free and are not responsible for any related damage or unauthorised alteration of e-mails by third parties after sending. For more information on Standard Life group, visit our website http://www.standardlife.com/ Standard Life plc (SC286832), Standard Life Assurance Limited* (SC286833) and Standard Life Employee Services Limited (SC271355) are all registered in Scotland at Standard Life House, 30 Lothian Road, Edinburgh EH1 2DH. *Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. 0131 225 2552. Calls may be recorded/monitored. Standard Life group includes Standard Life plc and its subsidiaries. Please consider the environment. Think - before you print.
Re: TSM administration difference between z/OS and open systems
Niklas, What will happen to TSM for MVS on 2012?
define drive without defining a library
Hi, Can a tape drive be defined in TSM while it is not controlled by a library? The syntax of define drive needs a library. Thanks
Re: BMR for Exchange server - Fastback
If TBMR is actually Fastback, that's interesting. Fastback is FilesX, a product and company that IBM purchased April 21, 2008. FilesX is a block level filesystem incremental backup product for MS Windows. They can use VSS for 2003 OS and 2005 Exchange/SQL. For older Exchange/SQL it will initiate a quiesce and will be filesystem aware and will manage the backups properly. Exchange individual mailbox restore is to mount up the backup over the network as a drive. The Exchange agent can access the exchange DB on disk and can pull out individual messages and save them to the running exchange server. For normal files, you can just copy them out of the mounted drive (looks like local, RW, NTFS but changes are lost on unmount). Full restore is to overmount the filesystem with the fastback server copy. At that point, it's similar to a mirror with one copy being the FB server and one copy being the local disk. You can mount/start your apps as soon as you initiate the restore. Any data overwritten will not be restored, and any data requested will be restored first in queue. No dismount is requred at the end of the restore. Bare Metal Recovery uses a PEmode CD to boot and initiate the beginning recovery. Fastback DR is formally through replication to a DR hub via FTP. Repository files are sequential access on disk. To integrate this with TSM, you use TSM to back up the Fastback repository, whether it's a local repository, or the repository of a DR hub. Fastback comes with scripts to integrate with TSM and a couple of other vendors' enterprise products. With friendly regards, Josh-Daniel S. Davis From: Johnny Lea j...@dis.umsmed.edu To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 1:20:50 PM Subject: [ADSM-L] BMR for Exchange server I'm lost trying to come up with a bare metal restore product for our Exchange servers. Cristie's CBMR says it treats Exchange data as plain files with nothing to handle the internal structure of Exchange. Not sure about Cristie's TBMR. (my IBM re-seller tells me he talked to Cristie and they told him that their TBMR is IBM Fastback BMR. That sounds strange. Did IBM buy them?) I haven't found anyone yet at IBM who can tell me how Fastback for Bare Metal Restore works with Exchange. Acronis...I know nothing about. I'd love something that would work with my TSM environment. Can anyone suggest anything? Thanks. Johnny Individuals who have received this information in error or are not authorized to receive it must promptly return or dispose of the information and notify the sender. Those individuals are hereby notified that they are strictly prohibited from reviewing, forwarding, printing, copying, distributing or using this information in any way.
Re: ORACLE Encryption
I am using InclExcl list for include.encrypt. For example: include * AIX include /.../* FSLPAR05 include /ifns_ifns/.../* DBLPAR05 include /patm_patm/.../* DBLPAR05 include /ptel_ptel/.../* DBLPAR05 exclude.dir /home/oracle/admin/ifns/adump exclude.dir /home/oracle/admin/patm/adump exclude.dir /home/oracle/admin/ptel/adump exclude.dir /home/oracle/product exclude.compression *.Z exclude.compression /backup05/ias/FS.* include.encrypt /ifns_ifns/.../* include.encrypt /patm_patm/.../* include.encrypt /ptel_ptel/.../* include.encrypt *.dmp.Z It means I have include.encrypt in include/exclude list for the both file systems and databases. Grigori G. Solonovitch Senior Technical Architect Information Technology Bank of Kuwait and Middle East http://www.bkme.com Phone: (+965) 2231-2274 Mobile: (+965) 99798073 E-Mail: g.solonovi...@bkme.com Please consider the environment before printing this Email -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Fred Johanson Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 5:41 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] ORACLE Encryption We register the TDPO as a distinct client. Most are on various flavors of UNIX. So where do we put the include.encrypt. Does it go in the dsmi_opt file or an incleexcl file referenced in that file? The manual isn't very clear. Fred Johanson TSM Administrator University of Chicago 773-702-8464 Please consider the environment before printing this Email. This email message and any attachments transmitted with it may contain confidential and proprietary information, intended only for the named recipient(s). If you have received this message in error, or if you are not the named recipient(s), please delete this email after notifying the sender immediately. BKME cannot guarantee the integrity of this communication and accepts no liability for any damage caused by this email or its attachments due to viruses, any other defects, interception or unauthorized modification. The information, views, opinions and comments of this message are those of the individual and not necessarily endorsed by BKME.
SV: [ADSM-L] define drive without defining a library
Can a tape drive be defined in TSM while it is not controlled by a library? The syntax of define drive needs a library. In TSM a drive is always in a library. You can however define a manual library in which you are the robotics DEFine LIBRary name LIBType=MANUAL Anders Räntilä
Re: SV: [ADSM-L] define drive without defining a library
the problem of a manual library is that there is no medium changer and so you cannot define a path to the library. correct me if I am mistaken: 1- define library 2- define path for library 3- define drive 4- define path for drive
SV: [ADSM-L] TSM administration difference between z/OS and open systems
b05e8e56c2f8aa4ba66a741904f362050790f...@legmsx06.calegis.net72de89f4100 2012227r3928b9a5o483dd4b925d2b...@mail.gmail.com In-Reply-To: 72de89f41002012227r3928b9a5o483dd4b925d2b...@mail.gmail.com Accept-Language: sv-SE Content-Language: sv-SE X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: sv-SE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-imss-version: 2.035 X-imss-result: Passed X-imss-scores: Clean:99.9 C:2 M:3 S:5 R:5 X-imss-settings: Baseline:1 C:2 M:1 S:1 R:1 (0. 0.) X-Barracuda-Connect: mail2.swedbank.se[164.10.46.102] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265097499 X-Barracuda-Encrypted: RC4-SHA X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam Virus Firewall at marist.edu IBM will stop supporting it, but I guess you could pay for longer support just as you can today with the older TSM Server versions /Niklas -Ursprungligt meddelande- Fr=E5n: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] F=F6r Mehdi S= alehi Skickat: den 2 februari 2010 07:27 Till: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU =C4mne: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM administration difference between z/OS and open sy= stems Niklas, What will happen to TSM for MVS on 2012?
