Policy Domain ...
Hi, please check the policy domain that we have configured in TSM5.5.0. Let me know is it a valid configuration? PolicyPolicyMgmt Copy Versions Versions Retain Retain DomainSet Name Class Group Data DataExtraOnly NameName NameExists Deleted Versions Version - - - - --- HUBDOMAIN ACTIVESTANDARD STANDARD 31 90 30 HUBDOMAIN STANDARD STANDARD STANDARD 31 90 30 Regards, Kiran. Disclaimer: This email message (including attachments if any) may contain privileged, proprietary, confidential information, which may be exempt from any kind of disclosure whatsoever and is intended solely for the use of addressee (s). If you are not the intended recipient, kindly inform us by return e-mail and also kindly disregard the contents of the e-mail, delete the original message and destroy any copies thereof immediately. You are notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited unless approved by the sender. DQ Entertainment (DQE) has taken every reasonable precaution to minimize the risk of transmission of computer viruses with this e-mail; DQE is not liable for any damage you may sustain as a result of any virus in this e-mail. DQE shall not be liable for the views expressed in the e-mail. DQE reserves the right to monitor and review the content of all messages sent to or from this e-mail address
Re: Policy Domain ...
Valid for what exactly? What is it that you require it to do in terms of retaining your clients' data? Then we can tell you if it meets your requirements. ___ David Mc London On 29 Oct 2010, at 07:14, M KIRAN KUMAR ki...@dqentertainment.com wrote: Hi, please check the policy domain that we have configured in TSM5.5.0. Let me know is it a valid configuration? PolicyPolicyMgmt Copy Versions Versions Retain Retain DomainSet Name Class Group Data DataExtraOnly NameName NameExists Deleted Versions Version - - - - --- HUBDOMAIN ACTIVESTANDARD STANDARD 31 90 30 HUBDOMAIN STANDARD STANDARD STANDARD 31 90 30 Regards, Kiran. Disclaimer: This email message (including attachments if any) may contain privileged, proprietary, confidential information, which may be exempt from any kind of disclosure whatsoever and is intended solely for the use of addressee (s). If you are not the intended recipient, kindly inform us by return e-mail and also kindly disregard the contents of the e-mail, delete the original message and destroy any copies thereof immediately. You are notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited unless approved by the sender. DQ Entertainment (DQE) has taken every reasonable precaution to minimize the risk of transmission of computer viruses with this e-mail; DQE is not liable for any damage you may sustain as a result of any virus in this e-mail. DQE shall not be liable for the views expressed in the e-mail. DQE reserves the right to monitor and review the content of all messages sent to or from this e-mail address
SV: Linux ext4 filesystems - is anyone using them for devt=file storage?
Hi Colwell, I'm using EXT4 on 2 TSM Servers. One of them do I have full controll of and it works fine. The other Linux system to I only see twice a year. But the customer normally drop me emails if he got something wrong. But the same problem with EXT4 as with EXT3 is that you need to pre allocate all volumes before and not let TSM create them on-demand. Best Regards Christian Svensson Cell: +46-70-325 1577 E-mail: christian.svens...@cristie.se Skype: cristie.christian.svensson Supported Platform for CPU2TSM:: http://www.cristie.se/cpu2tsm-supported-platforms Från: Colwell, William F. [bcolw...@draper.com] Skickat: den 28 oktober 2010 22:08 Till: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Ämne: Linux ext4 filesystems - is anyone using them for devt=file storage? Hi, I am running 2 6.1 servers on rhel 5.5. I am doing a lot of doing dedup. All primary storagepools are devicetype file. Current I have 10 16TB ext3 filesystems on raid 6 Sata. All volumes are scratch allocations. I have another 96TB ready to go. I haven't made the filesystems yet. So my question is if anyone is using ext4 yet as the filesystem type for TSM storagepools. From my initial reading, I think the extent allocation feature would be very useful. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ext4 I opened a pmr today to ask if IBM would support servers using ext4, and they just called back! They will support servers using ext4 for file storage. (But not for client backups yet). Also, is anyone using ext4 for the database? Thanks, Bill Colwell Draper Lab
Need to perform simple restoration test from offsite tape
Hi Everyone, I have completed the restoration test. Thanks for your feedback. Chan +-- |This was sent by cc1702...@gmail.com via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com. +--
Re: Policy Domain ...
We read in some document that RETONLY should be greater than or equal to RETEXTRA (RETONLY=RETEXTRA) Regards, Kiran. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of ADSM-L Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 1:06 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Policy Domain ... Valid for what exactly? What is it that you require it to do in terms of retaining your clients' data? Then we can tell you if it meets your requirements. ___ David Mc London On 29 Oct 2010, at 07:14, M KIRAN KUMAR ki...@dqentertainment.com wrote: Hi, please check the policy domain that we have configured in TSM5.5.0. Let me know is it a valid configuration? PolicyPolicyMgmt Copy Versions Versions Retain Retain DomainSet Name Class Group Data DataExtraOnly NameName NameExists Deleted Versions Version - - - - --- HUBDOMAIN ACTIVESTANDARD STANDARD 31 90 30 HUBDOMAIN STANDARD STANDARD STANDARD 31 90 30 Regards, Kiran. Disclaimer: This email message (including attachments if any) may contain privileged, proprietary, confidential information, which may be exempt from any kind of disclosure whatsoever and is intended solely for the use of addressee (s). If you are not the intended recipient, kindly inform us by return e-mail and also kindly disregard the contents of the e-mail, delete the original message and destroy any copies thereof immediately. You are notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited unless approved by the sender. DQ Entertainment (DQE) has taken every reasonable precaution to minimize the risk of transmission of computer viruses with this e-mail; DQE is not liable for any damage you may sustain as a result of any virus in this e-mail. DQE shall not be liable for the views expressed in the e-mail. DQE reserves the right to monitor and review the content of all messages sent to or from this e-mail address Disclaimer: This email message (including attachments if any) may contain privileged, proprietary, confidential information, which may be exempt from any kind of disclosure whatsoever and is intended solely for the use of addressee (s). If you are not the intended recipient, kindly inform us by return e-mail and also kindly disregard the contents of the e-mail, delete the original message and destroy any copies thereof immediately. You are notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited unless approved by the sender. DQ Entertainment (DQE) has taken every reasonable precaution to minimize the risk of transmission of computer viruses with this e-mail; DQE is not liable for any damage you may sustain as a result of any virus in this e-mail. DQE shall not be liable for the views expressed in the e-mail. DQE reserves the right to monitor and review the content of all messages sent to or from this e-mail address
Re: TDP Exchange indiviual mailbox restore failure
We use a product from Quest Software, for our Exchange 2003. http://www.quest.com/recovery-manager-for-exchange/ they say it supports Exchange 2007 and 2010 as well. Our only experience has been with the 2003 version. And that experience has been great. We use to recover emails that users have accidently deleted. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Bjoern Rackoll Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 7:49 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TDP Exchange indiviual mailbox restore failure Hi Del, As Cory stated and is documented: For Exchange 2010, both the Client Access (CAS) role and the Mailbox role must be installed on the machine where the Data Protection for Exchange mailbox restore is being performed. yes, I've read that document. Since we cannot go that road, I'm looking for alternatives. Is there any other (probably even third-party) tool that can be used to extract one user's mailbox from a complete Exchange database restore? This is a current limitation that will require a fix from Microsoft and possibly some updates to Data Protection for Exchange to resolve completely. IBM is working with Microsoft to resolve this limitation. Is there any timeframe for that? Any technote by Microsoft? Until a fix is available, the only workaround is to perform the IMR restore on a machine that has the CAS role installed. The machine that has the CAS role installed has no mailbox role, and no access to storage. That will stay that way. I'm sorry to say that IMR with CAS and mailbox roles separated are an absolute requirement in our setup, so if there's no solution in a not-too-long timeframe (and be it with some third-party tool), we have to look for a completely different backup solution for Exchange. Regards, -- Bjoern Rackoll University of Hamburg Regionales Rechenzentrum Zentrale Dienste Schlueterstr. 70 D-20146 Hamburg Tel.: +49 (0)40 42838 - 63 11 Fax: +49 (0)40 42838 - 62 70 Mobil: +49 (0)172 427 0301 E-Mail: bac...@rrz.uni-hamburg.de
Re: Linux ext4 filesystems - is anyone using them for devt=file storage?
They will support servers using ext4 for file storage. (But not for client backups yet). Huh? What do you mean by client backups? Do you mean as in file device class? We did not realize the filesystem type would be such an issue. We just built 2-systems using SAN storage and were wondering why one took almost 2x-longer wallclock time to format the storage volumes than the other. The person who installed the OS realize the slow system was ext2 while the faster one is ext4 so he reformatted the slow one to be ext4. Originally I had planned to use the SAN space as file dev class but have switched to 200GB formatted volumes (for 5TB space). However, we have noticed the system that was originally ext2, is generating these strange errors when formatting the SAN space, that we have not been able to identify nor resolve. If anyone else has seen these or can offer some suggestions, it would be greatly appreciated! Oct 29 10:56:23 moon kernel: qla2xxx :83:00.0: scsi(7:0:0): Abort command issued -- 1 9e1649 2002. Oct 29 11:42:57 moon kernel: qla2xxx :83:00.0: scsi(7:0:0): Abort command issued -- 1 a2cdc8 2002. Zoltan Forray TSM Software Hardware Administrator Virginia Commonwealth University UCC/Office of Technology Services zfor...@vcu.edu - 804-828-4807 Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will never use email to request that you reply with your password, social security number or confidential personal information. For more details visit http://infosecurity.vcu.edu/phishing.html From: Colwell, William F. bcolw...@draper.com To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Date: 10/28/2010 04:08 PM Subject: [ADSM-L] Linux ext4 filesystems - is anyone using them for devt=file storage? Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Hi, I am running 2 6.1 servers on rhel 5.5. I am doing a lot of doing dedup. All primary storagepools are devicetype file. Current I have 10 16TB ext3 filesystems on raid 6 Sata. All volumes are scratch allocations. I have another 96TB ready to go. I haven't made the filesystems yet. So my question is if anyone is using ext4 yet as the filesystem type for TSM storagepools. From my initial reading, I think the extent allocation feature would be very useful. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ext4 I opened a pmr today to ask if IBM would support servers using ext4, and they just called back! They will support servers using ext4 for file storage. (But not for client backups yet). Also, is anyone using ext4 for the database? Thanks, Bill Colwell Draper Lab
Re: Linux ext4 filesystems - is anyone using them for devt=file storage?
Hi Christian, thanks for the reply, I am glad to hear that someone else is using it. I haven't had a problem using scratch volumes. Could things be faster? Sure, but all the work is getting done. And I am expecting ext4 to improve things with extent allocation. I am also changing the hardware for the db which should speed things up too. Thanks again, - bill -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Christian Svensson Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 3:49 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: SV: Linux ext4 filesystems - is anyone using them for devt=file storage? Hi Colwell, I'm using EXT4 on 2 TSM Servers. One of them do I have full controll of and it works fine. The other Linux system to I only see twice a year. But the customer normally drop me emails if he got something wrong. But the same problem with EXT4 as with EXT3 is that you need to pre allocate all volumes before and not let TSM create them on-demand. Best Regards Christian Svensson Cell: +46-70-325 1577 E-mail: christian.svens...@cristie.se Skype: cristie.christian.svensson Supported Platform for CPU2TSM:: http://www.cristie.se/cpu2tsm-supported-platforms Från: Colwell, William F. [bcolw...@draper.com] Skickat: den 28 oktober 2010 22:08 Till: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Ämne: Linux ext4 filesystems - is anyone using them for devt=file storage? Hi, I am running 2 6.1 servers on rhel 5.5. I am doing a lot of doing dedup. All primary storagepools are devicetype file. Current I have 10 16TB ext3 filesystems on raid 6 Sata. All volumes are scratch allocations. I have another 96TB ready to go. I haven't made the filesystems yet. So my question is if anyone is using ext4 yet as the filesystem type for TSM storagepools. From my initial reading, I think the extent allocation feature would be very useful. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ext4 I opened a pmr today to ask if IBM would support servers using ext4, and they just called back! They will support servers using ext4 for file storage. (But not for client backups yet). Also, is anyone using ext4 for the database? Thanks, Bill Colwell Draper Lab
Re: Linux ext4 filesystems - is anyone using them for devt=file storage?
Hi, On 29 okt 2010, at 18:02, Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU wrote: They will support servers using ext4 for file storage. (But not for client backups yet). Huh? What do you mean by client backups? no, as a filesystem supported and recognized by dsmc. To fully support all features of the filesystem, like extended attributes, the client must know how to access those. Also, the client must be able to recognize sparse files and backup and restore those correctly. -- Met vriendelijke groeten/Kind Regards, Remco Post r.p...@plcs.nl +31 6 248 21 622
Re: Linux ext4 filesystems - is anyone using them for devt=file storage?
AHA..now I understand.and assume IBM is working towards resolving this issue! From: Remco Post r.p...@plcs.nl To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Date: 10/29/2010 01:01 PM Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Linux ext4 filesystems - is anyone using them for devt=file storage? Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Hi, On 29 okt 2010, at 18:02, Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU wrote: They will support servers using ext4 for file storage. (But not for client backups yet). Huh? What do you mean by client backups? no, as a filesystem supported and recognized by dsmc. To fully support all features of the filesystem, like extended attributes, the client must know how to access those. Also, the client must be able to recognize sparse files and backup and restore those correctly. -- Met vriendelijke groeten/Kind Regards, Remco Post r.p...@plcs.nl +31 6 248 21 622
Client support for VxFS on SLES 11?
Has anyone heard anything about when support for VxFS on SLES 11 is forthcoming? Thanks, [RC]
? how to change TSM V6 UID ?
I want to change/rename the user that owns a TSM v6 service. Is there an easy way to do that, or do we need to (unre)install? -- jim.o...@yale.edu (w#203.432.6693, c#203.494.9201, h#203.387.3030)
Compatibilities between V6 and V5 servers
A few questions about compatibility between sever version. I know that you can't directly export from a V6.2 server and import to V5.x server. Can you do this via tape or does the same rule apply? How about between a 6.2 and 6.1 server? Library managers and library clients? I know the docs say the highest version server should/must be the library manager as far as documented support/compatibility. However, I have been running my 6.1.x server as a library client to the 5.5 library managers without any problems. Now with 2-new 6.2 servers looming, I am working towards shifting library manager functionality to the 6.2 servers. But I want a safety net in case a library manager server fails/is unavailable (currently one server manages the TS1120 drives and another the TS1130 drives but all servers are cross-defined to each library manager server). Has anyone tested/configured a 6.2 server as a library client to a 5.5 server? Zoltan Forray TSM Software Hardware Administrator Virginia Commonwealth University UCC/Office of Technology Services zfor...@vcu.edu - 804-828-4807 Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will never use email to request that you reply with your password, social security number or confidential personal information. For more details visit http://infosecurity.vcu.edu/phishing.html
Tools for troubleshooting lin_tape and atape.
I'm looking for resources to use while troubleshooting reserve issues between lin_tape (on Linux), atape (on AIX), and an EDL pretending to be a 3584. I have the device driver IUG, and a few books on Fibre Channel. I've checked the RHEL and Emulex information, and am not finding any specifics. Any pointers would be appreciated. Thanks, [RC]
