EOS for TSM 5.4 and 5.5 (AIX)
Hi, Sorry if I ask a previously asked question, Google couldn't find the info I wanted. I am looking at the IBM End-of-Support page (http://www.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support/eos.html) and can not understand what is the EOS date for TSM 5.4 and 5.5, can somebody help me ? I assumed that they are not EOS now because they are fresh End-of-Marketing (July 16, 2010), so the big question is why Passport Advantage (show previous versions checked) shows only 6.1 and 6.2 binaries ? Regards, Tuncel Mutlu Bu e-posta ve muhtemel eklerinde verilen bilgiler kişiye özel ve gizli olup, yalnızca mesajda belirlenen alıcı ile ilgilidir.Size yanlışlıkla ulaşmışsa lütfen göndericiye bilgi veriniz, mesajı siliniz ve içeriğini başka bir kişiye açıklamayınız, herhangi bir ortama kopyalamayınız. Bu mesaj aksi sözleşme ile belirtilmedikçe herhangi bir finansal işlem teklifi, alımı, satımı veya herhangi bir havalenin teyidi gibi bankacılık işlemi yapılması amacını taşımamaktadır.Verilen tüm bilgilerin doğruluğu ve bütünlüğünün garantisi verilmemekte olup, önceden bildirilmeksizin değiştirilebilecektir.Bu mesajın içeriği Bankamızın resmi görüşlerini yansıtmayabileceğinden Akbank T.A.Ş. hiçbir hukuki sorumluluğu kabul etmez.
Re: EOS for TSM 5.4 and 5.5 (AIX)
Hello, I can see both 5.4 and 5.5 TSM binaries in the View all my downloads link. (Not download finder) Regards, Alper -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of tuncel.mu...@akbank.com Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 2:32 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] EOS for TSM 5.4 and 5.5 (AIX) Hi, Sorry if I ask a previously asked question, Google couldn't find the info I wanted. I am looking at the IBM End-of-Support page (http://www.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support/eos.html) and can not understand what is the EOS date for TSM 5.4 and 5.5, can somebody help me ? I assumed that they are not EOS now because they are fresh End-of-Marketing (July 16, 2010), so the big question is why Passport Advantage (show previous versions checked) shows only 6.1 and 6.2 binaries ? Regards, Tuncel Mutlu Bu e-posta ve muhtemel eklerinde verilen bilgiler kişiye özel ve gizli olup, yalnızca mesajda belirlenen alıcı ile ilgilidir.Size yanlışlıkla ulaşmışsa lütfen göndericiye bilgi veriniz, mesajı siliniz ve içeriğini başka bir kişiye açıklamayınız, herhangi bir ortama kopyalamayınız. Bu mesaj aksi sözleşme ile belirtilmedikçe herhangi bir finansal işlem teklifi, alımı, satımı veya herhangi bir havalenin teyidi gibi bankacılık işlemi yapılması amacını taşımamaktadır.Verilen tüm bilgilerin doğruluğu ve bütünlüğünün garantisi verilmemekte olup, önceden bildirilmeksizin değiştirilebilecektir.Bu mesajın içeriği Bankamızın resmi görüşlerini yansıtmayabileceğinden Akbank T.A.Ş. hiçbir hukuki sorumluluğu kabul etmez. Dikkat: Bu elektronik posta mesaji kisisel ve ozeldir. Eger size gonderilmediyse lutfen gondericiyi bilgilendirip mesaji siliniz.Firmamiza gelen ve giden mesajlar virus taramasindan gecirilmektedir. Mesajdaki gorusler gondericiye ait olup HAVELSAN A.S. resmi gorusu olmak zorunda degildir. Attention: This e-mail message is private and privileged.If you are not the recipient for whom this e-mail message is intended, please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail message from your system.All sent and received e-mail messages go through a virus scan. Any opinions presented in this e-mail message are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent HAVELSAN A.S.`s formal and authorized views.
Re: Database audit performance
Hi Keith! Been there, done that! During that run the auditdb finds errors and fixes them, but as soon as you start a second run, the audit finds the exact same errors. So although TSM says it fixes the errors, it doesn't. When I run a full audit and a second run afterwards, the second one no longer reports errors. So a partial audit won't work for us... Kind regards, Eric van Loon KLM Royal Dutch Airlines -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Keith Arbogast Sent: maandag 29 november 2010 16:12 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Database audit performance Eric, This may not apply to your case, but in hopes that it does... We had orphan entries in our database that were confined to storage records. I believe TSM Support was able to discern that from the error messages we were seeing in the Activity Log. That allowed us to do the audit on the storage records only, (auditdb diskstorage fix=yes) and that ran much faster than a full audit. In addition, we cleaned all data from the disk pools before starting the audit, and that accelerated the audit by a factor of 10 to 1. Best wishes, Keith For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 33014286
Re: Database audit performance
Hi Paul! Yes, I meant AIX LVM mirroring. The biggest improvement however was achieved by the unload/load. You should test this in your case too. Kind regards, Eric van Loon KLM Royal Dutch Airlines -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Paul Zarnowski Sent: maandag 29 november 2010 16:14 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Database audit performance Eric, Thank you for sharing your findings. When you say you turned off LV mirroring, are you referring to something like AIX LVM mirroring? Or perhaps to TSM dbvol mirroring? Not sure if you are using AIX or something else. Thanks. ..Paul At 05:00 AM 11/29/2010, Loon, EJ van - SPLXO wrote: Hi TSM-ers! Just to let you all know, I have found several things to speed up the auditdb. We have turned of logical volume mirroring on the LV containing the database volumes and I have tried the unload/load before starting the audit. Database audit used to take around 17 hours, turning off LV mirroring saved us another hour and after a unload/load (thank you very much Mark Haye from Development for the tip) the audit ran for 12 hours! Deleting all diskpool volumes before the audit saves me another 30 minutes. I will plan the audit in two separate steps: one downtime for the unload/load on day one and the auditdb on day two. Kind regards, Eric van Loon KLM Royal Dutch Airlines -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Loon, EJ van - SPLXO Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 5:44 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] Database audit performance Hi TSM-ers! We're having orphaned database entries, caused by a very old bug, fixed some server releases ago, but only recently discovered. I'm currently trying to find a way to speed-up the auditdb performance. What I'm planning to do is this: 1) backup the database on our production server 2) stop the production server 3) restore the production database on our test server which already used new disks, allocated on our new Vmax. 4) perform an audit fix=yes on this database 5) backup the fixed database and restore it on the production server I already tested the scenario above and it works, but the audit takes too long to finish (17 hours). Since we're backing up a lot of Oracle databases, TSM downtime will be too long, the Oracle recovery logs will fill up and the databases will stop. We are running an AIX TSM server with plenty of memory and multiple HBA to the SAN. Restoring the database runs ok, Topas is showing around 25 Mb/sec disk write speed. I have seen better performance on Vmax disks, but I can live with this. When I start the audit Topas shows a disk read and write speed average less than 1 Mb./sec. CPU average is around 50% and vmstat shows no page in and out. I tried everything: mounting the filespace with cio, dio, using RAW logical volumes, tuning read ahead through ioo, it doesn't make any difference or even gets worse (when using RAW for instance). I'm really out of options here. Something is holding back the audit, but I can't find what! Does anybody have some tips for me? Thank you VERY much in advance! Kind regards, Eric van Loon KLM Royal Dutch Airlines /prebrFor information, services and offers, please visit our web site: http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message.brbrKoninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.brKoninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 33014286 brpre For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its
What is Days between backups field in Admin Center/ISC/TIP
Hello All, Thanks for your help. I have never used the Days between backups parameter in the menu for configuring management classes. I have been asked what is for and do not know as I have never used it. I cannot seem to find anything in the TSM documentation for it either. Thanks Nicholas
Re: What is Days between backups field in Admin Center/ISC/TIP
It is a parameter the restricts how frequently backups of a client can occur. Say it is set to 1 day then those cients cannot perform backups more than once a day. I have used it to control a few backup happy admins here that like to perform a backup after each step of a project which at times equated up to 35 times in a 24 hour period. ~Rick -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Nicholas Rodolfich Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 4:02 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] What is Days between backups field in Admin Center/ISC/TIP Hello All, Thanks for your help. I have never used the Days between backups parameter in the menu for configuring management classes. I have been asked what is for and do not know as I have never used it. I cannot seem to find anything in the TSM documentation for it either. Thanks Nicholas
Re: What is Days between backups field in Admin Center/ISC/TIP
Thanks for you help Rick, I normally see this set to 0. So does 0 mean no restrictions? (i.e - it can be backup up as many times in a day as wanted) You said Say it is set to 1 day then those clients cannot perform backups more than once a day. This seems strange to me since this parameter refers to a management class, and a management class does not refer to clients, it refers to a specific file space or directory or file(s). How can it prevent a backup from occurring on a client? Maybe, the files that the management class binding calls out can only be backed up once a day? Thanks Again Rick! Regards, Nicholas ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 12/02/2010 03:15:35 PM: [image removed] Re: [ADSM-L] What is Days between backups field in Admin Center/ISC/TIP Rick Adamson to: ADSM-L 12/02/2010 03:16 PM Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager It is a parameter the restricts how frequently backups of a client can occur. Say it is set to 1 day then those cients cannot perform backups more than once a day. I have used it to control a few backup happy admins here that like to perform a backup after each step of a project which at times equated up to 35 times in a 24 hour period. ~Rick -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Nicholas Rodolfich Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 4:02 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] What is Days between backups field in Admin Center/ISC/TIP Hello All, Thanks for your help. I have never used the Days between backups parameter in the menu for configuring management classes. I have been asked what is for and do not know as I have never used it. I cannot seem to find anything in the TSM documentation for it either. Thanks Nicholas
Re: VMware backup questions
Doesn't appear to be out there anymore. [RC] On Nov 10, 2010, at 2:57 AM, Maurice van 't Loo wrote: Just found a usefull PDF: ftp://service.boulder.ibm.com/software/pwuploads/TSMRoadmap- VirtualEnvironmentsV310-05-10.pdf Regards, Maurice 2010/11/10 Maurice van 't Loo maur...@backitup.nu: In the very near future or just released, a TDP for VM's should be on the market. This was planned for ITSM 6.2.x Regards, Maurice 2010/11/8 TSM User user@gmail.com: I've been searching online, including a number of listserv posts, and what I'm finding is that the information I'm looking for seems pretty fragmented. I'm trying to figure out what the options are for backing up a VMware version 4 implementation in an all-Linux environment. I've determined that a proxy server is needed still for VADP/vStorage, just as for VCB. It appears that the proxy server must be run on Windows. I'm a bit confused about what's supported, though. So my questions are: --In one place in the client manual, it says that file-level backups are only supported for Windows VMs. I read on another website that TSM only works with VADP for file-level backups as of now, and for full VM backups, VCB is still required. Does this mean that VCB must be present in order to back up Linux guests, and that only full VM backups are available? That doesn't seem right to me, but that's where the bits of information I've run across leads me. --If the answer to the above is yes, does anyone know if there will be more options for Linux VMs any time soon, and what it's likely to be? --Has anyone been able to locate a single, comprehensive resource describing what functions are available in what circumstances and what's required for TSM with VADP? Someone please tell me I'm missing something Thanks!
Re: What is Days between backups field in Admin Center/ISC/TIP
This maps to the FREQUENCY setting that goes in the management class's backup copy group definition. If effectively adds another criterion to incremental backup: that is, the file must have changed AND the file must not have been backed up within the past n days (where n is the frequency setting). For example, assume the file was backed up on Dec 1. Even if the file changes every day, it will not be eligible for incremental backup again until Dec 8, no matter how many times it changes between those dates. The default value is 0 which means that the number of days since the last backup is not a factor. Frequency does not prevent a file from being selectively backed up. Best regards, Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Product Development Level 3 Team Lead Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Hartford/i...@ibmus Internet e-mail: stor...@us.ibm.com IBM Tivoli Storage Manager support web page: http://www.ibm.com/support/entry/portal/Overview/Software/Tivoli/Tivoli_Storage_Manager ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu wrote on 2010-12-02 16:52:13: From: Nicholas Rodolfich nrodolf...@cmaontheweb.com To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu Date: 2010-12-02 16:54 Subject: Re: What is Days between backups field in Admin Center/ISC/TIP Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu Thanks for you help Rick, I normally see this set to 0. So does 0 mean no restrictions? (i.e - it can be backup up as many times in a day as wanted) You said Say it is set to 1 day then those clients cannot perform backups more than once a day. This seems strange to me since this parameter refers to a management class, and a management class does not refer to clients, it refers to a specific file space or directory or file(s). How can it prevent a backup from occurring on a client? Maybe, the files that the management class binding calls out can only be backed up once a day? Thanks Again Rick! Regards, Nicholas ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 12/02/2010 03:15:35 PM: [image removed] Re: [ADSM-L] What is Days between backups field in Admin Center/ISC/TIP Rick Adamson to: ADSM-L 12/02/2010 03:16 PM Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager It is a parameter the restricts how frequently backups of a client can occur. Say it is set to 1 day then those cients cannot perform backups more than once a day. I have used it to control a few backup happy admins here that like to perform a backup after each step of a project which at times equated up to 35 times in a 24 hour period. ~Rick -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Nicholas Rodolfich Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 4:02 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] What is Days between backups field in Admin Center/ISC/TIP Hello All, Thanks for your help. I have never used the Days between backups parameter in the menu for configuring management classes. I have been asked what is for and do not know as I have never used it. I cannot seem to find anything in the TSM documentation for it either. Thanks Nicholas
? minimal workable TSMv6.2 Library Manager space allocations ?
Are you running a simple TSMv6 Library Manager (LM) service? I am trying to configure a minimal TSMv6.2 LM service and wondering, what are minimal workable TSMv6.2 DB, Log, and Archlog allocations? We're running an active TSMv5.5 LM service under AIX6.1 for some years now using 1GB each for DB and Log space! [See further below, if interested] I thought these allocations were reasonably generous for TSMv6.2 migration: DB01= 2GB DB02= 2GB Log = 4GB [Active Log] Archlog = 8GB [Archive Log] but apparently Active Log space is insufficient; DSMSERV LOADFORMAT fails w/ ANR0370E rdbicbck.c(772) During the format operation, the server cannot create files in one or more directories that you specified for ACTIVELOGDIR. Ensure that the file system where the directory is located has sufficient space. TSMv6.2: Planning to install server: Capacity planning: Active log space: http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/tsminfo/v6r2/topic/com.ibm.itsm.srv.install.doc/c_srv_inst_active_log_space.html says: ... The default size of the active log is 16,384 MB (16 GB). Under normal server operations, you are likely to need an active log that is larger than the default. The maximum size of the active log is 131,072 MB (128 GB). The minimum size of the active log is 2048 MB (2 GB). ... But, that 2GB minimum size seems to be unworkable w/ TSMv6.2: TSMv6.2: ANR Messages: Help for ANR0370E: http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/tsminfo/v6r2/topic/com.ibm.itsm.msgs.server.doc/msgs_server336.html says: ... * Check that space is available to the directories that you specified for ACTIVELOGDIR,ARCHIVELOGDIR, and ARCHFAILOVERLOGDIR. Ensure that the amount of space meets requirements. For example, the directory for ACTIVELOGDIR must have at least 8 GB space available. ... Increasing Active Log allocation 8GB, the error goes away, so the ANR0370E message advice is apparently correct! So... How would you configure DB, Log, ArchLog space for this TSMv6.2 LM service? Here's what our TSMv5.5.5 LM Service looks like: [Our LM TSM shares 3 tape libraries w/ 16*LTO2 + 60*LTO3 + 16*LTO5 drives w/ seven active Library Client TSM Backup/Recovery services, and also runs a gaggle of weeknightly differential NDMP backups and weekend DR+full NDMP backups for Oracle DBs and VMware guests on NetApps.] tsm: MGRq db Session established with server MGR: AIX-RS/6000 Server Version 5, Release 5, Level 5.0 Server date/time: 12/02/2010 21:42:31 Last access: 12/02/2010 14:52:13 Available Assigned Maximum MaximumPage Total Used Pct Max. Space Capacity Extension ReductionSizeUsable Pages Util Pct (MB) (MB) (MB) (MB) (bytes) Pages Util - - - --- - - - - 1,0201,020 0 288 4,096 261,120 186,853 71.6 71.6 tsm: MGRq log Available Assigned Maximum MaximumPage Total Used Pct Max. Space Capacity Extension ReductionSizeUsable Pages Util Pct (MB) (MB) (MB) (MB) (bytes) Pages Util - - - --- - - - - 1,016 764 252 544 4,096 195,07255,255 28.3 69.7 tsm: MGRq stg Storage Device EstimatedPctPct High Low Next Stora- Pool NameClass NameCapacity Util Migr Mig Mig ge Pool Pct Pct --- -- -- - - --- --- ARCHIVEPOOL DISK 0.0 M0.00.090 70 BACKUPL3NLTO3N 64,810 G 34.8 BACKUPL3NDR LTO3NDR 31,804 G9.3 BACKUPL3NDX LTO3NDR 155,767 G 73.3 BACKUPPOOL DISK 0.0 M0.00.090 70 SPACEMGPOOL DISK 0.0 M0.00.090 70 tsm: MGR Thanks for any advice you care to share. -- jim.o...@yale.edu (w#203.432.6693, c#203.494.9201, h#203.387.3030)
Re: ? minimal workable TSMv6.2 Library Manager space allocations ?
dsmserv format activelogsize=2048 On 3 dec 2010, at 06:21, James R Owen wrote: Are you running a simple TSMv6 Library Manager (LM) service? I am trying to configure a minimal TSMv6.2 LM service and wondering, what are minimal workable TSMv6.2 DB, Log, and Archlog allocations? We're running an active TSMv5.5 LM service under AIX6.1 for some years now using 1GB each for DB and Log space! [See further below, if interested] I thought these allocations were reasonably generous for TSMv6.2 migration: DB01= 2GB DB02= 2GB Log = 4GB [Active Log] Archlog = 8GB [Archive Log] but apparently Active Log space is insufficient; DSMSERV LOADFORMAT fails w/ ANR0370E rdbicbck.c(772) During the format operation, the server cannot create files in one or more directories that you specified for ACTIVELOGDIR. Ensure that the file system where the directory is located has sufficient space. TSMv6.2: Planning to install server: Capacity planning: Active log space: http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/tsminfo/v6r2/topic/com.ibm.itsm.srv.install.doc/c_srv_inst_active_log_space.html says: ... The default size of the active log is 16,384 MB (16 GB). Under normal server operations, you are likely to need an active log that is larger than the default. The maximum size of the active log is 131,072 MB (128 GB). The minimum size of the active log is 2048 MB (2 GB). ... But, that 2GB minimum size seems to be unworkable w/ TSMv6.2: TSMv6.2: ANR Messages: Help for ANR0370E: http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/tsminfo/v6r2/topic/com.ibm.itsm.msgs.server.doc/msgs_server336.html says: ... * Check that space is available to the directories that you specified for ACTIVELOGDIR,ARCHIVELOGDIR, and ARCHFAILOVERLOGDIR. Ensure that the amount of space meets requirements. For example, the directory for ACTIVELOGDIR must have at least 8 GB space available. ... Increasing Active Log allocation 8GB, the error goes away, so the ANR0370E message advice is apparently correct! So... How would you configure DB, Log, ArchLog space for this TSMv6.2 LM service? Here's what our TSMv5.5.5 LM Service looks like: [Our LM TSM shares 3 tape libraries w/ 16*LTO2 + 60*LTO3 + 16*LTO5 drives w/ seven active Library Client TSM Backup/Recovery services, and also runs a gaggle of weeknightly differential NDMP backups and weekend DR+full NDMP backups for Oracle DBs and VMware guests on NetApps.] tsm: MGRq db Session established with server MGR: AIX-RS/6000 Server Version 5, Release 5, Level 5.0 Server date/time: 12/02/2010 21:42:31 Last access: 12/02/2010 14:52:13 Available Assigned Maximum MaximumPage Total Used Pct Max. Space Capacity Extension ReductionSizeUsable Pages Util Pct (MB) (MB) (MB) (MB) (bytes) Pages Util - - - --- - - - - 1,0201,020 0 288 4,096 261,120 186,853 71.6 71.6 tsm: MGRq log Available Assigned Maximum MaximumPage Total Used Pct Max. Space Capacity Extension ReductionSizeUsable Pages Util Pct (MB) (MB) (MB) (MB) (bytes) Pages Util - - - --- - - - - 1,016 764 252 544 4,096 195,07255,255 28.3 69.7 tsm: MGRq stg Storage Device EstimatedPctPct High Low Next Stora- Pool NameClass NameCapacity Util Migr Mig Mig ge Pool Pct Pct --- -- -- - - --- --- ARCHIVEPOOL DISK 0.0 M0.00.090 70 BACKUPL3NLTO3N 64,810 G 34.8 BACKUPL3NDR LTO3NDR 31,804 G9.3 BACKUPL3NDX LTO3NDR 155,767 G 73.3 BACKUPPOOL DISK 0.0 M0.00.090 70 SPACEMGPOOL DISK 0.0 M0.00.090 70 tsm: MGR Thanks for any advice you care to share. -- jim.o...@yale.edu (w#203.432.6693, c#203.494.9201, h#203.387.3030)
