Re: Can't backup 6.2 server after library switch

2011-07-06 Thread Shawn Drew
The audit on the LM will wait until there is no library activity and there
are no pending tape mount requests and maybe even wait until all drives
are dismounted.  I found I need to have everything quiet in order for it
to run.
The alternative is to checkout everything with remove=no and check
everything back in.

and yes, only the LM should have "remote" volhist entries.The "remote"
entries on the new LM will be created when the library clients run their
individual audits.

I like to query everyone's volhist and q.vol output to make absolutely
sure there is no overlap.  That could get ugly if there is.

Regards,
Shawn

Shawn Drew





Internet
zfor...@vcu.edu

Sent by: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
07/06/2011 04:12 PM
Please respond to
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU


To
ADSM-L
cc

Subject
Re: [ADSM-L] Can't backup 6.2 server after library switch






Interesting read.  So basically, since almost everything mounted on a
server other than the old LM was "remote",  they all need to be removed
from the volhist on the old LM?

I have again tried running audits on the new LM but it always hangs.  I
ran a few on a couple of the LC servers and most ran - the other 6.2.2.2
server hung.  Plus it has other problem like 2-hung tape mounts.  I am
going to bounce it, soon.



From:
Shawn Drew 
To:
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Date:
07/06/2011 03:45 PM
Subject:
Re: [ADSM-L] Can't backup 6.2 server after library switch
Sent by:
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 



You will need to delete the volhist entries at the old library manager for
all the type "remote" tapes.

I did this recently and loosely based what I did on this:
http://www.tsmadmin.com/2006/03/how-to-setup-library-manager-instance.html

There is some good information on there, but it might not fit what you are
doing exactly.


Regards,
Shawn

Shawn Drew





Internet
zfor...@vcu.edu

Sent by: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
07/06/2011 03:05 PM
Please respond to
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU


To
ADSM-L
cc

Subject
Re: [ADSM-L] Can't backup 6.2 server after library switch






Thanks for the info.  I did not know that.

I will try to sneak one in.  These tape drives and library are busy,
ALL-THE-TIME.

Zoltan Forray
TSM Software & Hardware Administrator
Virginia Commonwealth University
UCC/Office of Technology Services
zfor...@vcu.edu - 804-828-4807
Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will
never use email to request that you reply with your password, social
security number or confidential personal information. For more details
visit http://infosecurity.vcu.edu/phishing.html



From:
David E Ehresman 
To:
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Date:
07/06/2011 02:41 PM
Subject:
Re: [ADSM-L] Can't backup 6.2 server after library switch
Sent by:
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 



An audit library run on a library client "claims" all the tapes that the
library manager has that belong to the client.  You'll want to use the
checklabel=barcode and run it at a time that tape volumes are not in
use.

David

>>> Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU  7/6/2011 2:32 PM >>>
Funny you should mention audit.

Why would I do an audit on a server that is a "library client"?  I
don't
think that is possible.

I tried to do an audit on the now library manager/6.1.4.3 server -
both
"checklabel=barcode" and just a simple "audit library".  After running
for
>1-hour (and hanging up all pending tape mounts), I killed it.



From:
David E Ehresman 
To:
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Date:
07/06/2011 02:19 PM
Subject:
Re: [ADSM-L] Can't backup 6.2 server after library switch
Sent by:
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 



Have you done an audit library on the 6.2 server? It almost sounds
like
it has a different view of your scratch tapes than the LM does.

David

>>> Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU  7/6/2011 12:17 PM >>>
Servers are RH Linux 6.2.2.2 and 6.1.4.3


Last week, we had some strange issues (don't ask - this one is for
Shark
Tank) with one of our 6.2.2.2 TSM servers, which is one of 2-Library
Managers for our 3494ATL.

So, in the interim we quickly moved the LM function to my 6.1.4.3
server,
shuffled all tape drives, paths and tapes, updated all server
devclasses,
etc.

Now, the 6.2 server that was the LM refuses to perform a DB backup to
the
6.1 LM server. Other tape processing (migrate, backup stgpool) seems
to
work just fine.

The error I get is:

7/6/2011 11:09:15 AM ANR8448E Scratch volume insert-volume-name-here
from
library IBM-TS1130 rejected - volume name is already in use.

which it repeats for 19-iterations and then fails with:

7/6/2011 11:24:00 AM ANR2971E Database backup/restore/rollforward
terminated - DB2 sqlcode -2025 error.

All the tapes it is given are scratch.

It proceeds to lock down all the tapes as if they were in use/private
and
I have to manually perform "delete volhist .. force=yes" on the 6.1 LM
server.

I have done a few Google searches and all I find are references to the
book on the ANR2971E error messages telling me to give it a scratc

Re: Can't backup 6.2 server after library switch

2011-07-06 Thread Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU
Interesting read.  So basically, since almost everything mounted on a
server other than the old LM was "remote",  they all need to be removed
from the volhist on the old LM?

I have again tried running audits on the new LM but it always hangs.  I
ran a few on a couple of the LC servers and most ran - the other 6.2.2.2
server hung.  Plus it has other problem like 2-hung tape mounts.  I am
going to bounce it, soon.



From:
Shawn Drew 
To:
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Date:
07/06/2011 03:45 PM
Subject:
Re: [ADSM-L] Can't backup 6.2 server after library switch
Sent by:
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 



You will need to delete the volhist entries at the old library manager for
all the type "remote" tapes.

I did this recently and loosely based what I did on this:
http://www.tsmadmin.com/2006/03/how-to-setup-library-manager-instance.html

There is some good information on there, but it might not fit what you are
doing exactly.


Regards,
Shawn

Shawn Drew





Internet
zfor...@vcu.edu

Sent by: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
07/06/2011 03:05 PM
Please respond to
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU


To
ADSM-L
cc

Subject
Re: [ADSM-L] Can't backup 6.2 server after library switch






Thanks for the info.  I did not know that.

I will try to sneak one in.  These tape drives and library are busy,
ALL-THE-TIME.

Zoltan Forray
TSM Software & Hardware Administrator
Virginia Commonwealth University
UCC/Office of Technology Services
zfor...@vcu.edu - 804-828-4807
Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will
never use email to request that you reply with your password, social
security number or confidential personal information. For more details
visit http://infosecurity.vcu.edu/phishing.html



From:
David E Ehresman 
To:
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Date:
07/06/2011 02:41 PM
Subject:
Re: [ADSM-L] Can't backup 6.2 server after library switch
Sent by:
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 



An audit library run on a library client "claims" all the tapes that the
library manager has that belong to the client.  You'll want to use the
checklabel=barcode and run it at a time that tape volumes are not in
use.

David

>>> Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU  7/6/2011 2:32 PM >>>
Funny you should mention audit.

Why would I do an audit on a server that is a "library client"?  I
don't
think that is possible.

I tried to do an audit on the now library manager/6.1.4.3 server -
both
"checklabel=barcode" and just a simple "audit library".  After running
for
>1-hour (and hanging up all pending tape mounts), I killed it.



From:
David E Ehresman 
To:
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Date:
07/06/2011 02:19 PM
Subject:
Re: [ADSM-L] Can't backup 6.2 server after library switch
Sent by:
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 



Have you done an audit library on the 6.2 server? It almost sounds
like
it has a different view of your scratch tapes than the LM does.

David

>>> Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU  7/6/2011 12:17 PM >>>
Servers are RH Linux 6.2.2.2 and 6.1.4.3


Last week, we had some strange issues (don't ask - this one is for
Shark
Tank) with one of our 6.2.2.2 TSM servers, which is one of 2-Library
Managers for our 3494ATL.

So, in the interim we quickly moved the LM function to my 6.1.4.3
server,
shuffled all tape drives, paths and tapes, updated all server
devclasses,
etc.

Now, the 6.2 server that was the LM refuses to perform a DB backup to
the
6.1 LM server. Other tape processing (migrate, backup stgpool) seems
to
work just fine.

The error I get is:

7/6/2011 11:09:15 AM ANR8448E Scratch volume insert-volume-name-here
from
library IBM-TS1130 rejected - volume name is already in use.

which it repeats for 19-iterations and then fails with:

7/6/2011 11:24:00 AM ANR2971E Database backup/restore/rollforward
terminated - DB2 sqlcode -2025 error.

All the tapes it is given are scratch.

It proceeds to lock down all the tapes as if they were in use/private
and
I have to manually perform "delete volhist .. force=yes" on the 6.1 LM
server.

I have done a few Google searches and all I find are references to the
book on the ANR2971E error messages telling me to give it a scratch
tape.

Any thoughts?

Zoltan Forray
TSM Software & Hardware Administrator
Virginia Commonwealth University
UCC/Office of Technology Services
zfor...@vcu.edu - 804-828-4807
Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations
will
never use email to request that you reply with your password, social
security number or confidential personal information. For more details
visit http://infosecurity.vcu.edu/phishing.html



This message and any attachments (the "message") is intended solely for
the addressees and is confidential. If you receive this message in error,
please delete it and immediately notify the sender. Any use not in accord
with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole or
partial,
is prohibited except formal approval. The internet can not guarantee the
integrity of this message. BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall (will)
not therefore be l

Re: Can't backup 6.2 server after library switch

2011-07-06 Thread Shawn Drew
You will need to delete the volhist entries at the old library manager for
all the type "remote" tapes.

I did this recently and loosely based what I did on this:
http://www.tsmadmin.com/2006/03/how-to-setup-library-manager-instance.html

There is some good information on there, but it might not fit what you are
doing exactly.


Regards,
Shawn

Shawn Drew





Internet
zfor...@vcu.edu

Sent by: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
07/06/2011 03:05 PM
Please respond to
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU


To
ADSM-L
cc

Subject
Re: [ADSM-L] Can't backup 6.2 server after library switch






Thanks for the info.  I did not know that.

I will try to sneak one in.  These tape drives and library are busy,
ALL-THE-TIME.

Zoltan Forray
TSM Software & Hardware Administrator
Virginia Commonwealth University
UCC/Office of Technology Services
zfor...@vcu.edu - 804-828-4807
Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will
never use email to request that you reply with your password, social
security number or confidential personal information. For more details
visit http://infosecurity.vcu.edu/phishing.html



From:
David E Ehresman 
To:
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Date:
07/06/2011 02:41 PM
Subject:
Re: [ADSM-L] Can't backup 6.2 server after library switch
Sent by:
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 



An audit library run on a library client "claims" all the tapes that the
library manager has that belong to the client.  You'll want to use the
checklabel=barcode and run it at a time that tape volumes are not in
use.

David

>>> Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU  7/6/2011 2:32 PM >>>
Funny you should mention audit.

Why would I do an audit on a server that is a "library client"?  I
don't
think that is possible.

I tried to do an audit on the now library manager/6.1.4.3 server -
both
"checklabel=barcode" and just a simple "audit library".  After running
for
>1-hour (and hanging up all pending tape mounts), I killed it.



From:
David E Ehresman 
To:
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Date:
07/06/2011 02:19 PM
Subject:
Re: [ADSM-L] Can't backup 6.2 server after library switch
Sent by:
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 



Have you done an audit library on the 6.2 server? It almost sounds
like
it has a different view of your scratch tapes than the LM does.

David

>>> Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU  7/6/2011 12:17 PM >>>
Servers are RH Linux 6.2.2.2 and 6.1.4.3


Last week, we had some strange issues (don't ask - this one is for
Shark
Tank) with one of our 6.2.2.2 TSM servers, which is one of 2-Library
Managers for our 3494ATL.

So, in the interim we quickly moved the LM function to my 6.1.4.3
server,
shuffled all tape drives, paths and tapes, updated all server
devclasses,
etc.

Now, the 6.2 server that was the LM refuses to perform a DB backup to
the
6.1 LM server. Other tape processing (migrate, backup stgpool) seems
to
work just fine.

The error I get is:

7/6/2011 11:09:15 AM ANR8448E Scratch volume insert-volume-name-here
from
library IBM-TS1130 rejected - volume name is already in use.

which it repeats for 19-iterations and then fails with:

7/6/2011 11:24:00 AM ANR2971E Database backup/restore/rollforward
terminated - DB2 sqlcode -2025 error.

All the tapes it is given are scratch.

It proceeds to lock down all the tapes as if they were in use/private
and
I have to manually perform "delete volhist .. force=yes" on the 6.1 LM
server.

I have done a few Google searches and all I find are references to the
book on the ANR2971E error messages telling me to give it a scratch
tape.

Any thoughts?

Zoltan Forray
TSM Software & Hardware Administrator
Virginia Commonwealth University
UCC/Office of Technology Services
zfor...@vcu.edu - 804-828-4807
Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations
will
never use email to request that you reply with your password, social
security number or confidential personal information. For more details
visit http://infosecurity.vcu.edu/phishing.html



This message and any attachments (the "message") is intended solely for
the addressees and is confidential. If you receive this message in error,
please delete it and immediately notify the sender. Any use not in accord
with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole or partial,
is prohibited except formal approval. The internet can not guarantee the
integrity of this message. BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall (will)
not therefore be liable for the message if modified. Please note that certain
functions and services for BNP Paribas may be performed by BNP Paribas RCC, Inc.


Re: Can't backup 6.2 server after library switch

2011-07-06 Thread Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU
Thanks for the info.  I did not know that.

I will try to sneak one in.  These tape drives and library are busy,
ALL-THE-TIME.

Zoltan Forray
TSM Software & Hardware Administrator
Virginia Commonwealth University
UCC/Office of Technology Services
zfor...@vcu.edu - 804-828-4807
Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will
never use email to request that you reply with your password, social
security number or confidential personal information. For more details
visit http://infosecurity.vcu.edu/phishing.html



From:
David E Ehresman 
To:
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Date:
07/06/2011 02:41 PM
Subject:
Re: [ADSM-L] Can't backup 6.2 server after library switch
Sent by:
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 



An audit library run on a library client "claims" all the tapes that the
library manager has that belong to the client.  You'll want to use the
checklabel=barcode and run it at a time that tape volumes are not in
use.

David

>>> Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU  7/6/2011 2:32 PM >>>
Funny you should mention audit.

Why would I do an audit on a server that is a "library client"?  I
don't
think that is possible.

I tried to do an audit on the now library manager/6.1.4.3 server -
both
"checklabel=barcode" and just a simple "audit library".  After running
for
>1-hour (and hanging up all pending tape mounts), I killed it.



From:
David E Ehresman 
To:
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Date:
07/06/2011 02:19 PM
Subject:
Re: [ADSM-L] Can't backup 6.2 server after library switch
Sent by:
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 



Have you done an audit library on the 6.2 server? It almost sounds
like
it has a different view of your scratch tapes than the LM does.

David

>>> Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU  7/6/2011 12:17 PM >>>
Servers are RH Linux 6.2.2.2 and 6.1.4.3


Last week, we had some strange issues (don't ask - this one is for
Shark
Tank) with one of our 6.2.2.2 TSM servers, which is one of 2-Library
Managers for our 3494ATL.

So, in the interim we quickly moved the LM function to my 6.1.4.3
server,
shuffled all tape drives, paths and tapes, updated all server
devclasses,
etc.

Now, the 6.2 server that was the LM refuses to perform a DB backup to
the
6.1 LM server. Other tape processing (migrate, backup stgpool) seems
to
work just fine.

The error I get is:

7/6/2011 11:09:15 AM ANR8448E Scratch volume insert-volume-name-here
from
library IBM-TS1130 rejected - volume name is already in use.

which it repeats for 19-iterations and then fails with:

7/6/2011 11:24:00 AM ANR2971E Database backup/restore/rollforward
terminated - DB2 sqlcode -2025 error.

All the tapes it is given are scratch.

It proceeds to lock down all the tapes as if they were in use/private
and
I have to manually perform "delete volhist .. force=yes" on the 6.1 LM
server.

I have done a few Google searches and all I find are references to the
book on the ANR2971E error messages telling me to give it a scratch
tape.

Any thoughts?

Zoltan Forray
TSM Software & Hardware Administrator
Virginia Commonwealth University
UCC/Office of Technology Services
zfor...@vcu.edu - 804-828-4807
Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations
will
never use email to request that you reply with your password, social
security number or confidential personal information. For more details
visit http://infosecurity.vcu.edu/phishing.html


Re: Can't backup 6.2 server after library switch

2011-07-06 Thread David E Ehresman
An audit library run on a library client "claims" all the tapes that the
library manager has that belong to the client.  You'll want to use the
checklabel=barcode and run it at a time that tape volumes are not in
use.

David

>>> Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU  7/6/2011 2:32 PM >>>
Funny you should mention audit.

Why would I do an audit on a server that is a "library client"?  I
don't
think that is possible.

I tried to do an audit on the now library manager/6.1.4.3 server -
both
"checklabel=barcode" and just a simple "audit library".  After running
for
>1-hour (and hanging up all pending tape mounts), I killed it.



From:
David E Ehresman 
To:
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Date:
07/06/2011 02:19 PM
Subject:
Re: [ADSM-L] Can't backup 6.2 server after library switch
Sent by:
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 



Have you done an audit library on the 6.2 server? It almost sounds
like
it has a different view of your scratch tapes than the LM does.

David

>>> Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU  7/6/2011 12:17 PM >>>
Servers are RH Linux 6.2.2.2 and 6.1.4.3


Last week, we had some strange issues (don't ask - this one is for
Shark
Tank) with one of our 6.2.2.2 TSM servers, which is one of 2-Library
Managers for our 3494ATL.

So, in the interim we quickly moved the LM function to my 6.1.4.3
server,
shuffled all tape drives, paths and tapes, updated all server
devclasses,
etc.

Now, the 6.2 server that was the LM refuses to perform a DB backup to
the
6.1 LM server. Other tape processing (migrate, backup stgpool) seems
to
work just fine.

The error I get is:

7/6/2011 11:09:15 AM ANR8448E Scratch volume insert-volume-name-here
from
library IBM-TS1130 rejected - volume name is already in use.

which it repeats for 19-iterations and then fails with:

7/6/2011 11:24:00 AM ANR2971E Database backup/restore/rollforward
terminated - DB2 sqlcode -2025 error.

All the tapes it is given are scratch.

It proceeds to lock down all the tapes as if they were in use/private
and
I have to manually perform "delete volhist .. force=yes" on the 6.1 LM
server.

I have done a few Google searches and all I find are references to the
book on the ANR2971E error messages telling me to give it a scratch
tape.

Any thoughts?

Zoltan Forray
TSM Software & Hardware Administrator
Virginia Commonwealth University
UCC/Office of Technology Services
zfor...@vcu.edu - 804-828-4807
Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations
will
never use email to request that you reply with your password, social
security number or confidential personal information. For more details
visit http://infosecurity.vcu.edu/phishing.html


Re: Can't backup 6.2 server after library switch

2011-07-06 Thread Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU
Funny you should mention audit.

Why would I do an audit on a server that is a "library client"?  I don't
think that is possible.

I tried to do an audit on the now library manager/6.1.4.3 server - both
"checklabel=barcode" and just a simple "audit library".  After running for
>1-hour (and hanging up all pending tape mounts), I killed it.



From:
David E Ehresman 
To:
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Date:
07/06/2011 02:19 PM
Subject:
Re: [ADSM-L] Can't backup 6.2 server after library switch
Sent by:
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 



Have you done an audit library on the 6.2 server? It almost sounds like
it has a different view of your scratch tapes than the LM does.

David

>>> Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU  7/6/2011 12:17 PM >>>
Servers are RH Linux 6.2.2.2 and 6.1.4.3


Last week, we had some strange issues (don't ask - this one is for
Shark
Tank) with one of our 6.2.2.2 TSM servers, which is one of 2-Library
Managers for our 3494ATL.

So, in the interim we quickly moved the LM function to my 6.1.4.3
server,
shuffled all tape drives, paths and tapes, updated all server
devclasses,
etc.

Now, the 6.2 server that was the LM refuses to perform a DB backup to
the
6.1 LM server. Other tape processing (migrate, backup stgpool) seems
to
work just fine.

The error I get is:

7/6/2011 11:09:15 AM ANR8448E Scratch volume insert-volume-name-here
from
library IBM-TS1130 rejected - volume name is already in use.

which it repeats for 19-iterations and then fails with:

7/6/2011 11:24:00 AM ANR2971E Database backup/restore/rollforward
terminated - DB2 sqlcode -2025 error.

All the tapes it is given are scratch.

It proceeds to lock down all the tapes as if they were in use/private
and
I have to manually perform "delete volhist .. force=yes" on the 6.1 LM
server.

I have done a few Google searches and all I find are references to the
book on the ANR2971E error messages telling me to give it a scratch
tape.

Any thoughts?

Zoltan Forray
TSM Software & Hardware Administrator
Virginia Commonwealth University
UCC/Office of Technology Services
zfor...@vcu.edu - 804-828-4807
Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations
will
never use email to request that you reply with your password, social
security number or confidential personal information. For more details
visit http://infosecurity.vcu.edu/phishing.html


Re: Can't backup 6.2 server after library switch

2011-07-06 Thread David E Ehresman
Have you done an audit library on the 6.2 server? It almost sounds like
it has a different view of your scratch tapes than the LM does.

David

>>> Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU  7/6/2011 12:17 PM >>>
Servers are RH Linux 6.2.2.2 and 6.1.4.3


Last week, we had some strange issues (don't ask - this one is for
Shark
Tank) with one of our 6.2.2.2 TSM servers, which is one of 2-Library
Managers for our 3494ATL.

So, in the interim we quickly moved the LM function to my 6.1.4.3
server,
shuffled all tape drives, paths and tapes, updated all server
devclasses,
etc.

Now, the 6.2 server that was the LM refuses to perform a DB backup to
the
6.1 LM server. Other tape processing (migrate, backup stgpool) seems
to
work just fine.

The error I get is:

7/6/2011 11:09:15 AM ANR8448E Scratch volume insert-volume-name-here
from
library IBM-TS1130 rejected - volume name is already in use.

which it repeats for 19-iterations and then fails with:

7/6/2011 11:24:00 AM ANR2971E Database backup/restore/rollforward
terminated - DB2 sqlcode -2025 error.

All the tapes it is given are scratch.

It proceeds to lock down all the tapes as if they were in use/private
and
I have to manually perform "delete volhist .. force=yes" on the 6.1 LM
server.

I have done a few Google searches and all I find are references to the
book on the ANR2971E error messages telling me to give it a scratch
tape.

Any thoughts?

Zoltan Forray
TSM Software & Hardware Administrator
Virginia Commonwealth University
UCC/Office of Technology Services
zfor...@vcu.edu - 804-828-4807
Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations
will
never use email to request that you reply with your password, social
security number or confidential personal information. For more details
visit http://infosecurity.vcu.edu/phishing.html


Re: TSM multi libraries in a single stgpool

2011-07-06 Thread Bob Levad
There is no reason a single library can't have multiple device classes.

If I thought I would ever need to run multiple libraries, I'd be tempted to 
create multiple device classes, one per tape storage pool.

Then if it ever became necessary to move a pool to another library, it would be 
a simple matter to update the device class to point to the new library and move 
the corresponding tapes.

Bob


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Remco 
Post
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2011 12:26 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM multi libraries in a single stgpool

On 6 jul 2011, at 14:09, Steven Langdale wrote:

>> Can TSM support having two libraries in a single stgpool?  Looking to add
>> another library but would to make sure it is used in tandem with our current
>> library and not just sit there.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Vince
>>
>
> Vince
>
> No you can't, it's one devclass in a stgpool and a devclass can only point
> to one library.
>
> Theres obviously nothing stopping you creating a new devclass and stgpool
> for this new library and pointing some servers at it to spread the workload.
>

or, use one library for the primary pools and another for the copy pools, or 
define one stgpool in the new library as the next for an existing pool in the 
existing lib.

> Steven

--
Met vriendelijke groeten/Kind Regards,

Remco Post
r.p...@plcs.nl
+31 6 248 21 622
This electronic transmission and any documents accompanying this electronic 
transmission contain confidential information belonging to the sender. This 
information may be legally privileged. The information is intended only for the 
use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended 
recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, 
or the taking of any action in reliance on or regarding the contents of this 
electronically transmitted information is strictly prohibited.


Re: TSM multi libraries in a single stgpool

2011-07-06 Thread J. Pohlmann
Or, if you want to go all-out, use eRMM - see

http://www-935.ibm.com/services/de/igs/pdf/br-stor-enterprise-remove-mm-en.p
df

that way, you can have many libraries managed by eRMM. TSM uses the external
library manager capability to have a storage pool cover many libraries.

Joerg Pohlmann

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
Remco Post
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2011 10:26
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM multi libraries in a single stgpool

On 6 jul 2011, at 14:09, Steven Langdale wrote:

>> Can TSM support having two libraries in a single stgpool?  Looking to
>> add another library but would to make sure it is used in tandem with
>> our current library and not just sit there.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Vince
>>
>
> Vince
>
> No you can't, it's one devclass in a stgpool and a devclass can only
> point to one library.
>
> Theres obviously nothing stopping you creating a new devclass and
> stgpool for this new library and pointing some servers at it to spread the
workload.
>

or, use one library for the primary pools and another for the copy pools, or
define one stgpool in the new library as the next for an existing pool in
the existing lib.

> Steven

--
Met vriendelijke groeten/Kind Regards,

Remco Post
r.p...@plcs.nl
+31 6 248 21 622


Re: TSM multi libraries in a single stgpool

2011-07-06 Thread Remco Post
On 6 jul 2011, at 14:09, Steven Langdale wrote:

>> Can TSM support having two libraries in a single stgpool?  Looking to add
>> another library but would to make sure it is used in tandem with our current
>> library and not just sit there.
>> 
>> Thank you,
>> Vince
>> 
> 
> Vince
> 
> No you can't, it's one devclass in a stgpool and a devclass can only point
> to one library.
> 
> Theres obviously nothing stopping you creating a new devclass and stgpool
> for this new library and pointing some servers at it to spread the workload.
> 

or, use one library for the primary pools and another for the copy pools, or 
define one stgpool in the new library as the next for an existing pool in the 
existing lib.

> Steven

-- 
Met vriendelijke groeten/Kind Regards,

Remco Post
r.p...@plcs.nl
+31 6 248 21 622


Re: TSM 6.2.2 client install disables 5.5 server

2011-07-06 Thread Storer, Raymond
Wanda, what happens if you perform a "Repair" install of the server software 
after the client upgrade? Is that even an option? ( Sorry, I don't run TSM 
server on Windows. )

Ray

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of 
Prather, Wanda
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2011 1:08 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] TSM 6.2.2 client install disables 5.5 server

Oh, this is too weird.
TSM 5.5.4.2 server on Win2k3.
Just upgraded the client on the same box from 5.5 to 6.2.2 so we can use 
SNAPDIFF to back up a Netapp.

Installing the 6.2.2 CLIENT disables the SERVER.
Yep. Didn't think it was possible.
DSMSERV message is ANR8591, "IBM GSKIT V7 must be installed".
Here's the link I found to the hit:
https://www-304.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21442260

But the link it gives for the GSKIT patch doesn't' have an option for a Win2K3 
version.

Commenting COMMETHOD HTTP out in the dsmserv.opt didn't help.
Uninstalling 6.2.2 client reenables the server.
Repeatable.

Anybody else run into this? What was the fix?

wanda, slinking off into stunned silence


CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  This email and any attachments are for the
exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient.  If you are not
the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
reliance upon this message. If you have received this in error, please
notify us immediately by return email and promptly delete this message
and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
message.


Re: TSM 6.2.2 client install disables 5.5 server

2011-07-06 Thread Remco Post
HI Wanda,

apparently the gskit version that comes with the 6.2 client is to new for the 
5.5 server. I guess you have two options: run the snapdiff on a different host, 
or upgrade the TSM server to 6.2

Be aware that the 6.2 server comes with a 6.1 API, and you must not upgrade 
that API

On 6 jul 2011, at 19:07, Prather, Wanda wrote:

> Oh, this is too weird.
> TSM 5.5.4.2 server on Win2k3.
> Just upgraded the client on the same box from 5.5 to 6.2.2 so we can use 
> SNAPDIFF to back up a Netapp.
> 
> Installing the 6.2.2 CLIENT disables the SERVER.
> Yep. Didn't think it was possible.
> DSMSERV message is ANR8591, "IBM GSKIT V7 must be installed".
> Here's the link I found to the hit:
> https://www-304.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21442260
> 
> But the link it gives for the GSKIT patch doesn't' have an option for a 
> Win2K3 version.
> 
> Commenting COMMETHOD HTTP out in the dsmserv.opt didn't help.
> Uninstalling 6.2.2 client reenables the server.
> Repeatable.
> 
> Anybody else run into this? What was the fix?
> 
> wanda, slinking off into stunned silence

-- 
Met vriendelijke groeten/Kind Regards,

Remco Post
r.p...@plcs.nl
+31 6 248 21 622


TSM 6.2.2 client install disables 5.5 server

2011-07-06 Thread Prather, Wanda
Oh, this is too weird.
TSM 5.5.4.2 server on Win2k3.
Just upgraded the client on the same box from 5.5 to 6.2.2 so we can use 
SNAPDIFF to back up a Netapp.

Installing the 6.2.2 CLIENT disables the SERVER.
Yep. Didn't think it was possible.
DSMSERV message is ANR8591, "IBM GSKIT V7 must be installed".
Here's the link I found to the hit:
https://www-304.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21442260

But the link it gives for the GSKIT patch doesn't' have an option for a Win2K3 
version.

Commenting COMMETHOD HTTP out in the dsmserv.opt didn't help.
Uninstalling 6.2.2 client reenables the server.
Repeatable.

Anybody else run into this? What was the fix?

wanda, slinking off into stunned silence


Can't backup 6.2 server after library switch

2011-07-06 Thread Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU
Servers are RH Linux 6.2.2.2 and 6.1.4.3


Last week, we had some strange issues (don't ask - this one is for Shark
Tank) with one of our 6.2.2.2 TSM servers, which is one of 2-Library
Managers for our 3494ATL.

So, in the interim we quickly moved the LM function to my 6.1.4.3 server,
shuffled all tape drives, paths and tapes, updated all server devclasses,
etc.

Now, the 6.2 server that was the LM refuses to perform a DB backup to the
6.1 LM server. Other tape processing (migrate, backup stgpool) seems to
work just fine.

The error I get is:

7/6/2011 11:09:15 AM ANR8448E Scratch volume insert-volume-name-here from
library IBM-TS1130 rejected - volume name is already in use.

which it repeats for 19-iterations and then fails with:

7/6/2011 11:24:00 AM ANR2971E Database backup/restore/rollforward
terminated - DB2 sqlcode -2025 error.

All the tapes it is given are scratch.

It proceeds to lock down all the tapes as if they were in use/private and
I have to manually perform "delete volhist .. force=yes" on the 6.1 LM
server.

I have done a few Google searches and all I find are references to the
book on the ANR2971E error messages telling me to give it a scratch tape.

Any thoughts?

Zoltan Forray
TSM Software & Hardware Administrator
Virginia Commonwealth University
UCC/Office of Technology Services
zfor...@vcu.edu - 804-828-4807
Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will
never use email to request that you reply with your password, social
security number or confidential personal information. For more details
visit http://infosecurity.vcu.edu/phishing.html


SV: How to remove scratch tapes from stgpool

2011-07-06 Thread Christian Svensson
If the tapes are listed as scratch they are not dedicated to a storage pool 
anymore.
But if you want to delete a tape or volume from a storage pool you just tape 
"del vol VOLUMENAME"

If you mean it still in Volhistory you can type del volhist type= 
volume=x tod=+0 force=yes 

Best Regards
Christian Svensson

Cell: +46-70-325 1577
E-mail: christian.svens...@cristie.se
Supported Platform for CPU2TSM:: 
http://www.cristie.se/cpu2tsm-supported-platforms


Från: D'Antonio III, Vincent E (N-Aerotek) [vincent.e.d'antonio@lmco.com]
Skickat: den 6 juli 2011 15:51
Till: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Ämne: How to remove scratch tapes from stgpool

Good morning,
Is there a way to remove tapes from an stgpool after you have deleted the 
stgpool?  The tapes are listed as scratch.

Thanks
Vince


Re: TSM multi libraries in a single stgpool

2011-07-06 Thread Steven Langdale
> Can TSM support having two libraries in a single stgpool?  Looking to add
> another library but would to make sure it is used in tandem with our current
> library and not just sit there.
>
> Thank you,
> Vince
>

Vince

No you can't, it's one devclass in a stgpool and a devclass can only point
to one library.

Theres obviously nothing stopping you creating a new devclass and stgpool
for this new library and pointing some servers at it to spread the workload.

Steven


TSM multi libraries in a single stgpool

2011-07-06 Thread D'Antonio III, Vincent E (N-Aerotek)
Good morning,

Can TSM support having two libraries in a single stgpool?  Looking to add 
another library but would to make sure it is used in tandem with our current 
library and not just sit there.

Thank you,
Vince


FCM (Flashcopy Manger) - Snapshot name + Policy ?

2011-07-06 Thread Tpm73
hello,

i use TSM Flashcopy manager 6.2 for backuping (create snapshot on a storage 
XIV) ms exchange 2010.

basically it works fine, but i have two questions:

1) the name of the FCM created snapshot on the xiv is a random "name"
is it possible to "create/define" a "fix" name (eg: SNAPShot_Month_Year) for 
the snapshot?
instead of VSS-12345678----123456789012

2) in the FCM exchange GUI there can be defined a POLICAY
a) how many number of snapshots to keep - default 2 versions
b) days to keep a snapshot - default 30 days

i have changed a) to 6 versions

but now i had the problem that last week before the 3rd snapshot was created
the first was DELETED!!! ???

why?
an error, anyhting else i must configure?
or is the problem that b) is 30 days and the first snapshot is older than 30 
days??

thanks!

+--
|This was sent by martin.p...@kt-net.at via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com.
+--