Re: snapdiff advice
I add my voice to this question. We would really like to see this. At 11:31 AM 9/22/2011, Shawn Drew wrote: >I'd like to add a question to the FAQ if possible. I'll ask it frequently >if it helps getting it added! > >The documentation explicitly states that vfiler support (Multistore) is >not supported. Is support for this somewhere on the roadmap? or is there >something on the Netapp side that prevents this? > >Regards, >Shawn > >Shawn Drew > > > > > >Internet >ra...@us.ibm.com > >Sent by: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU >09/22/2011 09:07 AM >Please respond to >ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > > >To >ADSM-L >cc > >Subject >Re: [ADSM-L] snapdiff advice > > > > > > >Hello Paul and David, > >A frequently asked questions website has been created for snapshot >differencing. >We have attempted to answer the questions you have recently raised. > >https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/wikis/display/tivolistoragemanager/Snapshot > >+Differencing+FAQ > > > >This message and any attachments (the "message") is intended solely for >the addressees and is confidential. If you receive this message in error, >please delete it and immediately notify the sender. Any use not in accord >with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole or partial, >is prohibited except formal approval. The internet can not guarantee the >integrity of this message. BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall (will) >not therefore be liable for the message if modified. Please note that certain >functions and services for BNP Paribas may be performed by BNP Paribas RCC, >Inc. -- Paul ZarnowskiPh: 607-255-4757 Manager, Storage Services Fx: 607-255-8521 719 Rhodes Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853-3801Em: p...@cornell.edu
Re: snapdiff advice
We had to set the virus scanner to ignore the ~snapshot directory to get rid of the bulk of our access denied problems. We still have an ongoing problem with wide UTF characters (tickets open with IBM to resolve it), despite OnTap 7.3.4 and TSM 6.2.3.1. If I recall correctly, we were seeing those invalid file handle messages related to this, as well. We're also getting a fair number of "ANS1304W: An active backup version could not be found", which I haven't been able to figure why. To the original poster's question, we're running snapdiff from a 6.2 client to a 5.4 server. IBM will tell you to piss off if you have any problems, though, unless you can reproduce it against a 6.1 or 6.2 server. - Cameron Hanover chano...@umich.edu Fill with mingled cream and amber, I will drain that glass again. Such hilarious visions clamber Through the chamber of my brain — Quaintest thoughts — queerest fancies Come to life and fade away; What care I how time advances? I am drinking ale today. —-Edgar Allan Poe On Sep 22, 2011, at 3:44 PM, Huebschman, George J. wrote: > I have the same issue...at least it sounds the same, with messages like > this > (Paraphrased) > ANS4013E Invalid File Handle, and ANS4007E Access to the object denied > > I have been manually toggling virus scanning off and triggering manual > backups of the errant files. That gets them backed up. > Size of the file seems to be a factor...but not always. > > George Huebschman > Storage Support Administrator > Legg Mason, LMTS > > When you have a choice, spend your money where you would want to work if > it was your only choice, because soon it might be. > > -Original Message- > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of > Remco Post > Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 3:30 PM > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] snapdiff advice > > good to hear. We have major issues with a windows client for CIFS > shares. The client keeps on complaining about the right to backup the > file permissions without any clear indication of what is wrong. We even > tried runninf the client as a domain admin with full access rights to > everything and still no go > > On 22 sep. 2011, at 20:57, Shawn Drew wrote: > >> I did have this working on TSM 5.5 with a TSM 6.2 AIX client (nfs > shares). >> >> >> We just have a subset of volumes that are on vfilers that is > preventing >> me from adopting this solution "whole-hog" >> >> >> Regards, >> Shawn >> >> Shawn Drew >> >> >> >> >> >> Internet >> r.p...@plcs.nl >> >> Sent by: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU >> 09/22/2011 01:25 PM >> Please respond to >> ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU >> >> >> To >> ADSM-L >> cc >> >> Subject >> Re: [ADSM-L] snapdiff advice >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Hi All, >> >> I've got another question, maybe not for the FAQ ;-) >> >> Has anybody got this working? >> >> And maybe for the FAQ: >> >> Are there TSM server requirements? Does SnapDiff require the TSM > server to >> be at version 6, or is a 5.5 server supported? >> >> >> On 22 sep. 2011, at 17:31, Shawn Drew wrote: >> >>> I'd like to add a question to the FAQ if possible. I'll ask it >> frequently >>> if it helps getting it added! >>> >>> The documentation explicitly states that vfiler support (Multistore) > is >>> not supported. Is support for this somewhere on the roadmap? or is >> there >>> something on the Netapp side that prevents this? >>> >>> Regards, >>> Shawn >>> >>> Shawn Drew >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Internet >>> ra...@us.ibm.com >>> >>> Sent by: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU >>> 09/22/2011 09:07 AM >>> Please respond to >>> ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU >>> >>> >>> To >>> ADSM-L >>> cc >>> >>> Subject >>> Re: [ADSM-L] snapdiff advice >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Hello Paul and David, >>> >>> A frequently asked questions website has been created for snapshot >>> differencing. >>> We have attempted to answer the questions you have recently raised. >>> >>> >> > https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/wikis/display/tivolistoragemanager/Sn > apshot >> >>> >>> +Differencing+FAQ >>> >>> >>> >>> This message and any attachments (the "message") is intended solely > for >>> the addressees and is confidential. If you receive this message in >> error, >>> please delete it and immediately notify the sender. Any use not in >> accord >>> with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole or >> partial, >>> is prohibited except formal approval. The internet can not guarantee > the >>> integrity of this message. BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall >> (will) >>> not therefore be liable for the message if modified. Please note that >> certain >>> functions and services for BNP Paribas may be performed by BNP > Paribas >> RCC, Inc. >> >> -- >> Met vriendelijke groeten/Kind Regards, >> >> Remco Post >> r.p...@plcs.nl >> +31 6 248 21 622 >> >> >> >> This message
Re: TSM 6.2.2 unrecoverable DB backup
Richard, We use a Data Domain 880 for constant replication. The database backup, devconfig, volhist, and prepare file time stamps matched the source. The DD880 file system is mounted as read-only on the server performing recovery. I have not used snapshots for access database and storage pool data. NB: After a successful recovery I update TSM volume access to read-only. If this is not done then I cannot recovery from any filling volumes. Jim -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Cowen, Richard Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 3:07 PM To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM 6.2.2 unrecoverable DB backup Jim, What method/appliance for replication are you using? Did the datetime stamp for all 3 files (dbbackup, devconfig, volhist) match up with the source system? Did you snap the replicated side to make it read only before attempting the restore? Richard Cowen -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Schneider, Jim Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 3:06 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] TSM 6.2.2 unrecoverable DB backup Hello TSMers AIX 6.1 TSM 6.2.2.0 I have been testing DR recovery using replicated DB backups and storage pools, recovering to a second TSM instance on a remote server. I have found that I cannot restore from every database backup. I ran successful restores on Monday and Wednesday but today's restore attempt failed. db2diag messages include 2011-09-22-09.24.36.455938-300 I1562137A367 LEVEL: Warning PID : 17105122 TID : 2111PROC : db2sysc 0 INSTANCE: tsminst1 NODE : 000 EDUID : 2111 EDUNAME: db2logmgr (TSMDB1) 0 FUNCTION: DB2 UDB, data protection services, sqlpgRetrieveLogFile, probe:4130 MESSAGE : Started retrieve for log file S223.LOG. 2011-09-22-09.24.36.456575-300 E1562505A576 LEVEL: Error PID : 17105122 TID : 2111PROC : db2sysc 0 INSTANCE: tsminst1 NODE : 000 EDUID : 2111 EDUNAME: db2logmgr (TSMDB1) 0 FUNCTION: DB2 UDB, data protection services, sqlpgRetrieveLogDisk, probe:3500 MESSAGE : ZRC=0x860F000A=-2045837302=SQLO_FNEX "File not found." DIA8411C A file "S223.LOG" could not be found. DATA #1 : String, 110 bytes This might mean that end-of-logs has been reached. Check for other errors to verify whether this is the case. 2011-09-22-09.24.36.457229-300 E1563082A434 LEVEL: Warning PID : 17105122 TID : 2111PROC : db2sysc 0 INSTANCE: tsminst1 NODE : 000 EDUID : 2111 EDUNAME: db2logmgr (TSMDB1) 0 FUNCTION: DB2 UDB, data protection services, sqlpgRetrieveLogFile, probe:4165 MESSAGE : ADM1847W Failed to retrieve log file "S223.LOG" on chain "12" to "/arclog/recovery/RstDbLog/". 2011-09-22-09.24.36.657930-300 I1563517A561 LEVEL: Error PID : 17105122 TID : 10078 PROC : db2sysc 0 INSTANCE: tsminst1 NODE : 000 DB : TSMDB1 APPHDL : 0-37 APPID: *LOCAL.tsminst1.110922142314 AUTHID : TSMINST1 EDUID : 10078EDUNAME: db2redom (TSMDB1) 0 FUNCTION: DB2 UDB, recovery manager, sqlpPRecReadLog, probe:1275 RETCODE : ZRC=0x071000D7=118489303=SQLP_EXT_NOT_IN_CHAIN "This extent is not a successor of the previous extent. Fwd Recovery can not continue." I ran another DB backup, backed up devconfig, volhist, and ran prepare. After waiting for the data to replicate to the remote site my restore test was successful. The error messages I listed did not occur during the successful restore attempt. There were no activity log messages indicating an error during the first (unusable) DB backup. It appears that I cannot recover from all of my DB backups and wonder if anybody else has run across the same situation. I'm trying to determine if the problem is mine or ours. With confused and gracious desperation, Jim Schneider United Stationers The information contained in this transmission may contain privileged and confidential information. It is intended only for the use of the person(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. To reply to our email administrator directly, please send an email to postmas...@sbsplanet.com.
Re: TSM 6.2.2 unrecoverable DB backup
Jim, What method/appliance for replication are you using? Did the datetime stamp for all 3 files (dbbackup, devconfig, volhist) match up with the source system? Did you snap the replicated side to make it read only before attempting the restore? Richard Cowen -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Schneider, Jim Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 3:06 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] TSM 6.2.2 unrecoverable DB backup Hello TSMers AIX 6.1 TSM 6.2.2.0 I have been testing DR recovery using replicated DB backups and storage pools, recovering to a second TSM instance on a remote server. I have found that I cannot restore from every database backup. I ran successful restores on Monday and Wednesday but today's restore attempt failed. db2diag messages include 2011-09-22-09.24.36.455938-300 I1562137A367 LEVEL: Warning PID : 17105122 TID : 2111PROC : db2sysc 0 INSTANCE: tsminst1 NODE : 000 EDUID : 2111 EDUNAME: db2logmgr (TSMDB1) 0 FUNCTION: DB2 UDB, data protection services, sqlpgRetrieveLogFile, probe:4130 MESSAGE : Started retrieve for log file S223.LOG. 2011-09-22-09.24.36.456575-300 E1562505A576 LEVEL: Error PID : 17105122 TID : 2111PROC : db2sysc 0 INSTANCE: tsminst1 NODE : 000 EDUID : 2111 EDUNAME: db2logmgr (TSMDB1) 0 FUNCTION: DB2 UDB, data protection services, sqlpgRetrieveLogDisk, probe:3500 MESSAGE : ZRC=0x860F000A=-2045837302=SQLO_FNEX "File not found." DIA8411C A file "S223.LOG" could not be found. DATA #1 : String, 110 bytes This might mean that end-of-logs has been reached. Check for other errors to verify whether this is the case. 2011-09-22-09.24.36.457229-300 E1563082A434 LEVEL: Warning PID : 17105122 TID : 2111PROC : db2sysc 0 INSTANCE: tsminst1 NODE : 000 EDUID : 2111 EDUNAME: db2logmgr (TSMDB1) 0 FUNCTION: DB2 UDB, data protection services, sqlpgRetrieveLogFile, probe:4165 MESSAGE : ADM1847W Failed to retrieve log file "S223.LOG" on chain "12" to "/arclog/recovery/RstDbLog/". 2011-09-22-09.24.36.657930-300 I1563517A561 LEVEL: Error PID : 17105122 TID : 10078 PROC : db2sysc 0 INSTANCE: tsminst1 NODE : 000 DB : TSMDB1 APPHDL : 0-37 APPID: *LOCAL.tsminst1.110922142314 AUTHID : TSMINST1 EDUID : 10078EDUNAME: db2redom (TSMDB1) 0 FUNCTION: DB2 UDB, recovery manager, sqlpPRecReadLog, probe:1275 RETCODE : ZRC=0x071000D7=118489303=SQLP_EXT_NOT_IN_CHAIN "This extent is not a successor of the previous extent. Fwd Recovery can not continue." I ran another DB backup, backed up devconfig, volhist, and ran prepare. After waiting for the data to replicate to the remote site my restore test was successful. The error messages I listed did not occur during the successful restore attempt. There were no activity log messages indicating an error during the first (unusable) DB backup. It appears that I cannot recover from all of my DB backups and wonder if anybody else has run across the same situation. I'm trying to determine if the problem is mine or ours. With confused and gracious desperation, Jim Schneider United Stationers The information contained in this transmission may contain privileged and confidential information. It is intended only for the use of the person(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. To reply to our email administrator directly, please send an email to postmas...@sbsplanet.com.
Re: snapdiff advice
I have the same issue...at least it sounds the same, with messages like this (Paraphrased) ANS4013E Invalid File Handle, and ANS4007E Access to the object denied I have been manually toggling virus scanning off and triggering manual backups of the errant files. That gets them backed up. Size of the file seems to be a factor...but not always. George Huebschman Storage Support Administrator Legg Mason, LMTS When you have a choice, spend your money where you would want to work if it was your only choice, because soon it might be. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Remco Post Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 3:30 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] snapdiff advice good to hear. We have major issues with a windows client for CIFS shares. The client keeps on complaining about the right to backup the file permissions without any clear indication of what is wrong. We even tried runninf the client as a domain admin with full access rights to everything and still no go On 22 sep. 2011, at 20:57, Shawn Drew wrote: > I did have this working on TSM 5.5 with a TSM 6.2 AIX client (nfs shares). > > > We just have a subset of volumes that are on vfilers that is preventing > me from adopting this solution "whole-hog" > > > Regards, > Shawn > > Shawn Drew > > > > > > Internet > r.p...@plcs.nl > > Sent by: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > 09/22/2011 01:25 PM > Please respond to > ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > > > To > ADSM-L > cc > > Subject > Re: [ADSM-L] snapdiff advice > > > > > > > Hi All, > > I've got another question, maybe not for the FAQ ;-) > > Has anybody got this working? > > And maybe for the FAQ: > > Are there TSM server requirements? Does SnapDiff require the TSM server to > be at version 6, or is a 5.5 server supported? > > > On 22 sep. 2011, at 17:31, Shawn Drew wrote: > >> I'd like to add a question to the FAQ if possible. I'll ask it > frequently >> if it helps getting it added! >> >> The documentation explicitly states that vfiler support (Multistore) is >> not supported. Is support for this somewhere on the roadmap? or is > there >> something on the Netapp side that prevents this? >> >> Regards, >> Shawn >> >> Shawn Drew >> >> >> >> >> >> Internet >> ra...@us.ibm.com >> >> Sent by: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU >> 09/22/2011 09:07 AM >> Please respond to >> ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU >> >> >> To >> ADSM-L >> cc >> >> Subject >> Re: [ADSM-L] snapdiff advice >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Hello Paul and David, >> >> A frequently asked questions website has been created for snapshot >> differencing. >> We have attempted to answer the questions you have recently raised. >> >> > https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/wikis/display/tivolistoragemanager/Sn apshot > >> >> +Differencing+FAQ >> >> >> >> This message and any attachments (the "message") is intended solely for >> the addressees and is confidential. If you receive this message in > error, >> please delete it and immediately notify the sender. Any use not in > accord >> with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole or > partial, >> is prohibited except formal approval. The internet can not guarantee the >> integrity of this message. BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall > (will) >> not therefore be liable for the message if modified. Please note that > certain >> functions and services for BNP Paribas may be performed by BNP Paribas > RCC, Inc. > > -- > Met vriendelijke groeten/Kind Regards, > > Remco Post > r.p...@plcs.nl > +31 6 248 21 622 > > > > This message and any attachments (the "message") is intended solely for > the addressees and is confidential. If you receive this message in error, > please delete it and immediately notify the sender. Any use not in accord > with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole or partial, > is prohibited except formal approval. The internet can not guarantee the > integrity of this message. BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall (will) > not therefore be liable for the message if modified. Please note that certain > functions and services for BNP Paribas may be performed by BNP Paribas RCC, Inc. -- Met vriendelijke groeten/Kind Regards, Remco Post r.p...@plcs.nl +31 6 248 21 622 IMPORTANT: E-mail sent through the Internet is not secure. Legg Mason therefore recommends that you do not send any confidential or sensitive information to us via electronic mail, including social security numbers, account numbers, or personal identification numbers. Delivery, and or timely delivery of Internet mail is not guaranteed. Legg Mason therefore recommends that you do not send time sensitive or action-oriented messages to us via electronic mail. This message is intended for the addressee only and may contain privileged or confidential information. Unless you are the intended recipient, you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone any
Re: snapdiff advice
good to hear. We have major issues with a windows client for CIFS shares. The client keeps on complaining about the right to backup the file permissions without any clear indication of what is wrong. We even tried runninf the client as a domain admin with full access rights to everything and still no go On 22 sep. 2011, at 20:57, Shawn Drew wrote: > I did have this working on TSM 5.5 with a TSM 6.2 AIX client (nfs shares). > > > We just have a subset of volumes that are on vfilers that is preventing > me from adopting this solution "whole-hog" > > > Regards, > Shawn > > Shawn Drew > > > > > > Internet > r.p...@plcs.nl > > Sent by: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > 09/22/2011 01:25 PM > Please respond to > ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > > > To > ADSM-L > cc > > Subject > Re: [ADSM-L] snapdiff advice > > > > > > > Hi All, > > I've got another question, maybe not for the FAQ ;-) > > Has anybody got this working? > > And maybe for the FAQ: > > Are there TSM server requirements? Does SnapDiff require the TSM server to > be at version 6, or is a 5.5 server supported? > > > On 22 sep. 2011, at 17:31, Shawn Drew wrote: > >> I'd like to add a question to the FAQ if possible. I'll ask it > frequently >> if it helps getting it added! >> >> The documentation explicitly states that vfiler support (Multistore) is >> not supported. Is support for this somewhere on the roadmap? or is > there >> something on the Netapp side that prevents this? >> >> Regards, >> Shawn >> >> Shawn Drew >> >> >> >> >> >> Internet >> ra...@us.ibm.com >> >> Sent by: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU >> 09/22/2011 09:07 AM >> Please respond to >> ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU >> >> >> To >> ADSM-L >> cc >> >> Subject >> Re: [ADSM-L] snapdiff advice >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Hello Paul and David, >> >> A frequently asked questions website has been created for snapshot >> differencing. >> We have attempted to answer the questions you have recently raised. >> >> > https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/wikis/display/tivolistoragemanager/Snapshot > >> >> +Differencing+FAQ >> >> >> >> This message and any attachments (the "message") is intended solely for >> the addressees and is confidential. If you receive this message in > error, >> please delete it and immediately notify the sender. Any use not in > accord >> with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole or > partial, >> is prohibited except formal approval. The internet can not guarantee the >> integrity of this message. BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall > (will) >> not therefore be liable for the message if modified. Please note that > certain >> functions and services for BNP Paribas may be performed by BNP Paribas > RCC, Inc. > > -- > Met vriendelijke groeten/Kind Regards, > > Remco Post > r.p...@plcs.nl > +31 6 248 21 622 > > > > This message and any attachments (the "message") is intended solely for > the addressees and is confidential. If you receive this message in error, > please delete it and immediately notify the sender. Any use not in accord > with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole or partial, > is prohibited except formal approval. The internet can not guarantee the > integrity of this message. BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall (will) > not therefore be liable for the message if modified. Please note that certain > functions and services for BNP Paribas may be performed by BNP Paribas RCC, > Inc. -- Met vriendelijke groeten/Kind Regards, Remco Post r.p...@plcs.nl +31 6 248 21 622
Sql assistance in tsm 6.2.2
Trying to convert the following script from tsm 5.5.4 to 6.2.2. Want to check exipiration performance and then bakcup performance (another script). Script follows: select activity, cast ((end_time) as date) as "Date", - (examined/cast ((end_time-start_time) seconds as decimal (18,13)) *3600) - "Objects Examined Up/Hr" from summary where - activity='EXPIRATION' and days (end_time) -days (start_time)=0 Thanks for any help. Gary Lee Senior System Programmer Ball State University phone: 765-285-1310
Re: snapdiff advice
I did have this working on TSM 5.5 with a TSM 6.2 AIX client (nfs shares). We just have a subset of volumes that are on vfilers that is preventing me from adopting this solution "whole-hog" Regards, Shawn Shawn Drew Internet r.p...@plcs.nl Sent by: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU 09/22/2011 01:25 PM Please respond to ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU To ADSM-L cc Subject Re: [ADSM-L] snapdiff advice Hi All, I've got another question, maybe not for the FAQ ;-) Has anybody got this working? And maybe for the FAQ: Are there TSM server requirements? Does SnapDiff require the TSM server to be at version 6, or is a 5.5 server supported? On 22 sep. 2011, at 17:31, Shawn Drew wrote: > I'd like to add a question to the FAQ if possible. I'll ask it frequently > if it helps getting it added! > > The documentation explicitly states that vfiler support (Multistore) is > not supported. Is support for this somewhere on the roadmap? or is there > something on the Netapp side that prevents this? > > Regards, > Shawn > > Shawn Drew > > > > > > Internet > ra...@us.ibm.com > > Sent by: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > 09/22/2011 09:07 AM > Please respond to > ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > > > To > ADSM-L > cc > > Subject > Re: [ADSM-L] snapdiff advice > > > > > > > Hello Paul and David, > > A frequently asked questions website has been created for snapshot > differencing. > We have attempted to answer the questions you have recently raised. > > https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/wikis/display/tivolistoragemanager/Snapshot > > +Differencing+FAQ > > > > This message and any attachments (the "message") is intended solely for > the addressees and is confidential. If you receive this message in error, > please delete it and immediately notify the sender. Any use not in accord > with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole or partial, > is prohibited except formal approval. The internet can not guarantee the > integrity of this message. BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall (will) > not therefore be liable for the message if modified. Please note that certain > functions and services for BNP Paribas may be performed by BNP Paribas RCC, Inc. -- Met vriendelijke groeten/Kind Regards, Remco Post r.p...@plcs.nl +31 6 248 21 622 This message and any attachments (the "message") is intended solely for the addressees and is confidential. If you receive this message in error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender. Any use not in accord with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited except formal approval. The internet can not guarantee the integrity of this message. BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall (will) not therefore be liable for the message if modified. Please note that certain functions and services for BNP Paribas may be performed by BNP Paribas RCC, Inc.
TSM 6.2.2 unrecoverable DB backup
Hello TSMers AIX 6.1 TSM 6.2.2.0 I have been testing DR recovery using replicated DB backups and storage pools, recovering to a second TSM instance on a remote server. I have found that I cannot restore from every database backup. I ran successful restores on Monday and Wednesday but today's restore attempt failed. db2diag messages include 2011-09-22-09.24.36.455938-300 I1562137A367 LEVEL: Warning PID : 17105122 TID : 2111PROC : db2sysc 0 INSTANCE: tsminst1 NODE : 000 EDUID : 2111 EDUNAME: db2logmgr (TSMDB1) 0 FUNCTION: DB2 UDB, data protection services, sqlpgRetrieveLogFile, probe:4130 MESSAGE : Started retrieve for log file S223.LOG. 2011-09-22-09.24.36.456575-300 E1562505A576 LEVEL: Error PID : 17105122 TID : 2111PROC : db2sysc 0 INSTANCE: tsminst1 NODE : 000 EDUID : 2111 EDUNAME: db2logmgr (TSMDB1) 0 FUNCTION: DB2 UDB, data protection services, sqlpgRetrieveLogDisk, probe:3500 MESSAGE : ZRC=0x860F000A=-2045837302=SQLO_FNEX "File not found." DIA8411C A file "S223.LOG" could not be found. DATA #1 : String, 110 bytes This might mean that end-of-logs has been reached. Check for other errors to verify whether this is the case. 2011-09-22-09.24.36.457229-300 E1563082A434 LEVEL: Warning PID : 17105122 TID : 2111PROC : db2sysc 0 INSTANCE: tsminst1 NODE : 000 EDUID : 2111 EDUNAME: db2logmgr (TSMDB1) 0 FUNCTION: DB2 UDB, data protection services, sqlpgRetrieveLogFile, probe:4165 MESSAGE : ADM1847W Failed to retrieve log file "S223.LOG" on chain "12" to "/arclog/recovery/RstDbLog/". 2011-09-22-09.24.36.657930-300 I1563517A561 LEVEL: Error PID : 17105122 TID : 10078 PROC : db2sysc 0 INSTANCE: tsminst1 NODE : 000 DB : TSMDB1 APPHDL : 0-37 APPID: *LOCAL.tsminst1.110922142314 AUTHID : TSMINST1 EDUID : 10078EDUNAME: db2redom (TSMDB1) 0 FUNCTION: DB2 UDB, recovery manager, sqlpPRecReadLog, probe:1275 RETCODE : ZRC=0x071000D7=118489303=SQLP_EXT_NOT_IN_CHAIN "This extent is not a successor of the previous extent. Fwd Recovery can not continue." I ran another DB backup, backed up devconfig, volhist, and ran prepare. After waiting for the data to replicate to the remote site my restore test was successful. The error messages I listed did not occur during the successful restore attempt. There were no activity log messages indicating an error during the first (unusable) DB backup. It appears that I cannot recover from all of my DB backups and wonder if anybody else has run across the same situation. I'm trying to determine if the problem is mine or ours. With confused and gracious desperation, Jim Schneider United Stationers
TSM-DB2 Restore to another DB2 server?
Hi all, Wondering if anyone can help me out here as my DB2 knowledge is lacking to say the least. My DBA has come to me and asked if TSM has the ability to restore a DB2 database backup to another DB2 server? Our TSM servers are 5.5.5.2 (Win) and the backup client/API is level 5.5.1.10 (AIX). Any help or references to information is greatly appreciated. TIA, ~Rick Adamson Jax, FL.
Re: snapdiff advice
Hi All, I've got another question, maybe not for the FAQ ;-) Has anybody got this working? And maybe for the FAQ: Are there TSM server requirements? Does SnapDiff require the TSM server to be at version 6, or is a 5.5 server supported? On 22 sep. 2011, at 17:31, Shawn Drew wrote: > I'd like to add a question to the FAQ if possible. I'll ask it frequently > if it helps getting it added! > > The documentation explicitly states that vfiler support (Multistore) is > not supported. Is support for this somewhere on the roadmap? or is there > something on the Netapp side that prevents this? > > Regards, > Shawn > > Shawn Drew > > > > > > Internet > ra...@us.ibm.com > > Sent by: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > 09/22/2011 09:07 AM > Please respond to > ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > > > To > ADSM-L > cc > > Subject > Re: [ADSM-L] snapdiff advice > > > > > > > Hello Paul and David, > > A frequently asked questions website has been created for snapshot > differencing. > We have attempted to answer the questions you have recently raised. > > https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/wikis/display/tivolistoragemanager/Snapshot > > +Differencing+FAQ > > > > This message and any attachments (the "message") is intended solely for > the addressees and is confidential. If you receive this message in error, > please delete it and immediately notify the sender. Any use not in accord > with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole or partial, > is prohibited except formal approval. The internet can not guarantee the > integrity of this message. BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall (will) > not therefore be liable for the message if modified. Please note that certain > functions and services for BNP Paribas may be performed by BNP Paribas RCC, > Inc. -- Met vriendelijke groeten/Kind Regards, Remco Post r.p...@plcs.nl +31 6 248 21 622
help
HELP
Re: snapdiff advice
I'd like to add a question to the FAQ if possible. I'll ask it frequently if it helps getting it added! The documentation explicitly states that vfiler support (Multistore) is not supported. Is support for this somewhere on the roadmap? or is there something on the Netapp side that prevents this? Regards, Shawn Shawn Drew Internet ra...@us.ibm.com Sent by: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU 09/22/2011 09:07 AM Please respond to ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU To ADSM-L cc Subject Re: [ADSM-L] snapdiff advice Hello Paul and David, A frequently asked questions website has been created for snapshot differencing. We have attempted to answer the questions you have recently raised. https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/wikis/display/tivolistoragemanager/Snapshot +Differencing+FAQ This message and any attachments (the "message") is intended solely for the addressees and is confidential. If you receive this message in error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender. Any use not in accord with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited except formal approval. The internet can not guarantee the integrity of this message. BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall (will) not therefore be liable for the message if modified. Please note that certain functions and services for BNP Paribas may be performed by BNP Paribas RCC, Inc.
HSM + Windows 2008 DFS
Hi TSMers, has anybody tried this before? We are breaking a Windows 2003 File Server Cluster and migrating the data to a Windows 2008 R2 DFS environment with two hosts. Today this cluster has TSM 5.5 + HSM 5.5. Approximately, the HSM is handling 2 TB of data. By the nature of the DFS environment, it will constantly check and validate the data replication between the hosts. So the Windows HSM concept does not apply to this scenario, since the stub files left in the file system will be accessed "constantly" and then retrieved from the TSM Server. Is it correct? My best regards, Bruno Melo
Re: snapdiff advice
Hello Paul and David, A frequently asked questions website has been created for snapshot differencing. We have attempted to answer the questions you have recently raised. https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/wikis/display/tivolistoragemanager/Snapshot +Differencing+FAQ
Re: dsmserv.err not being written to
Ah ok, thanks Richard Farren -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Richard Sims Sent: 22 September 2011 12:41 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] dsmserv.err not being written to It's not an issue: the server error log is for recording thread and process termination events. The Activity Log records hardware events, which supplements your operating system error logging and any product-specific SNMP monitoring that's occurring. Richard Sims John Wiley & Sons Limited is a private limited company registered in England with registered number 641132. Registered office address: The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, United Kingdom. PO19 8SQ.
Re: dsmserv.err not being written to
It's not an issue: the server error log is for recording thread and process termination events. The Activity Log records hardware events, which supplements your operating system error logging and any product-specific SNMP monitoring that's occurring. Richard Sims
dsmserv.err not being written to
Hi all I am still trying to figure out why I'm seeing intermittent drive faults, but have noticed that the dsmserv.err log is not getting written to (and hasn't been for a long time). TSM 5.5.2.0 on Solaris 2.9 Has anyone else had a similar issue? Any ideas why the log isn't being written to? Regards Farren John Wiley & Sons Limited is a private limited company registered in England with registered number 641132. Registered office address: The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, United Kingdom. PO19 8SQ.
