replication issue tsm 6.3.0
Error during nodegroup replication, but I cant see any errors on the target server ANR1815W Check target server for storage problems during replication of node MINERVA, PERSEUS, SILVANUS, THESEUS, POKUCMS2, POKXPR1, POKSESAP1, POKOSVMS1, POKXPRSAT2, CRONUS, POKVERINTDB, POKVERINTREC, POKVERINTARC. (SESSION: 51623, PROCESS: 709) Rerun of replicate works Thanks, Tim Brown Supervisor Computer Operations Central Hudson Gas Electric 284 South Ave Poughkeepsie, NY 12601 Email: mailto:tbr...@cenhud.com tbr...@cenhud.com mailto:tbr...@cenhud.com mailto:tbr...@cenhud.com Phone: 845-486-5643 Fax: 845-486-5921 Cell: 845-235-4255 This message contains confidential information and is only for the intended recipient. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this note and deleting all copies and attachments.
Re: replication issue tsm 6.3.0
Tim, I have been fighting this problem for several months now. IBM is looking at it, but haven't come up with a solution. Ray On May 2, 2012, at 10:39 AM, Tim Brown wrote: Error during nodegroup replication, but I cant see any errors on the target server ANR1815W Check target server for storage problems during replication of node MINERVA, PERSEUS, SILVANUS, THESEUS, POKUCMS2, POKXPR1, POKSESAP1, POKOSVMS1, POKXPRSAT2, CRONUS, POKVERINTDB, POKVERINTREC, POKVERINTARC. (SESSION: 51623, PROCESS: 709) Rerun of replicate works Thanks, Tim Brown Supervisor Computer Operations Central Hudson Gas Electric 284 South Ave Poughkeepsie, NY 12601 Email: mailto:tbr...@cenhud.com tbr...@cenhud.com mailto:tbr...@cenhud.com mailto:tbr...@cenhud.com Phone: 845-486-5643 Fax: 845-486-5921 Cell: 845-235-4255 This message contains confidential information and is only for the intended recipient. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this note and deleting all copies and attachments.
Re: replication issue tsm 6.3.0
Thanks!! Tim -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Ray Carlson Sent: Wednesday, 02 May, 2012 11:52 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: replication issue tsm 6.3.0 Tim, I have been fighting this problem for several months now. IBM is looking at it, but haven't come up with a solution. Ray On May 2, 2012, at 10:39 AM, Tim Brown wrote: Error during nodegroup replication, but I cant see any errors on the target server ANR1815W Check target server for storage problems during replication of node MINERVA, PERSEUS, SILVANUS, THESEUS, POKUCMS2, POKXPR1, POKSESAP1, POKOSVMS1, POKXPRSAT2, CRONUS, POKVERINTDB, POKVERINTREC, POKVERINTARC. (SESSION: 51623, PROCESS: 709) Rerun of replicate works Thanks, Tim Brown Supervisor Computer Operations Central Hudson Gas Electric 284 South Ave Poughkeepsie, NY 12601 Email: mailto:tbr...@cenhud.com tbr...@cenhud.com mailto:tbr...@cenhud.com mailto:tbr...@cenhud.com Phone: 845-486-5643 Fax: 845-486-5921 Cell: 845-235-4255 This message contains confidential information and is only for the intended recipient. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this note and deleting all copies and attachments.
Antwort: Re: [ADSM-L] replication issue tsm 6.3.0
Hi, same at my site... some nodes currently never finish (although they did in the past). I have a PMR open at IBM and it seems to have to do with invalid links in the storage pool on the target. I bet you're using dedupe pools, isn't it? in an second case I have the opposite situation. source has invalid links, so my replication fails, but without this error and no other messages... Regards, Alex Von:Ray Carlson rlcarl...@anl.gov An: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Datum: 02.05.2012 17:58 Betreff:Re: [ADSM-L] replication issue tsm 6.3.0 Gesendet von: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Tim, I have been fighting this problem for several months now. IBM is looking at it, but haven't come up with a solution. Ray On May 2, 2012, at 10:39 AM, Tim Brown wrote: Error during nodegroup replication, but I cant see any errors on the target server ANR1815W Check target server for storage problems during replication of node MINERVA, PERSEUS, SILVANUS, THESEUS, POKUCMS2, POKXPR1, POKSESAP1, POKOSVMS1, POKXPRSAT2, CRONUS, POKVERINTDB, POKVERINTREC, POKVERINTARC. (SESSION: 51623, PROCESS: 709) Rerun of replicate works Thanks, Tim Brown Supervisor Computer Operations Central Hudson Gas Electric 284 South Ave Poughkeepsie, NY 12601 Email: mailto:tbr...@cenhud.com tbr...@cenhud.com mailto:tbr...@cenhud.com mailto:tbr...@cenhud.com Phone: 845-486-5643 Fax: 845-486-5921 Cell: 845-235-4255 This message contains confidential information and is only for the intended recipient. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this note and deleting all copies and attachments. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: Tivoli Server Specs
I have about 500 nodes on my p5's running 5.4 and they are on the edge. The P7's running 6.2 have less than 250 nodes and are overpowered. Testing indicates that the upgrade of the p5's to p6's and 6.2 will leave room to grow. All 6.2 servers are 32GB. The p7's are 2 CPU and the p6's are 4 CPU. All are allowed to steal CPU (LPARs are great). The disks are SAN attached, I am using real and imagined tape and disk pools. I do not dedup with TSM. Things to consider: 1. if you can complete your backups in the window you have enough network bandwidth 2. if you can complete expiration in a reasonable time you have enough CPU 3. if you can complete reclamation in a reasonable time you have enough storage bandwidth The hard part is all three can be affected by slow disk, not enough RAM and a busy CPU. Profile the current server and see where it is no longer performing to expectations and make sure that the weak points are addressed with the new hardware. If an upgrade from 5 to 6 is also happening make sure the new system addresses the change in DB. In my case the p5's are losing the expiration battle, the test runs with 6.2 on the p6 show great improvement in run time (faster CPU and some 6.2 improvements). I also found my network was staying busy longer during the backup window, so I doubled the bandwidth. In 2 weeks theory becomes reality. I am sure your situation is different, but I hope this helps. Others may have additions or other ideas. Andy Huebner -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Ballenger, Craig Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 3:08 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Tivoli Server Specs Please see below... -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Huebner,Andy,FORT WORTH,IT Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 10:38 AM To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Tivoli Server Specs A few details would help. 1. How many nodes - 380 2. How much data (total daily) - not sure, but the DB is 256 GB on the largest TSM instance. 3. Deduplication - No dedup. I have a pair of P7s with 32GB RAM that are running great. I have 4 P5s that are a bit overloaded that will be upgraded to P6 with 32GB RAM. No dedup and about 4,000 nodes total. Andy Huebner -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Ballenger, Craig Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 9:15 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] Tivoli Server Specs All, I am attempting to spec out a server(s) for TSM 6 and were wondering what hardware you folks are running it on. We were looking at the Power Series from IBM (POWER6/POWER7). Any info will help. Thanks, Craig Ballenger This e-mail (including any attachments) is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not an intended recipient or an authorized representative of an intended recipient, you are prohibited from using, copying or distributing the information in this e-mail or its attachments. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete all copies of this message and any attachments. Thank you. This e-mail (including any attachments) is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not an intended recipient or an authorized representative of an intended recipient, you are prohibited from using, copying or distributing the information in this e-mail or its attachments. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete all copies of this message and any attachments. Thank you.
Re: Tivoli Server Specs
Thanks Andy! This helps. Craig -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Huebner,Andy,FORT WORTH,IT Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2012 12:34 PM To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Tivoli Server Specs I have about 500 nodes on my p5's running 5.4 and they are on the edge. The P7's running 6.2 have less than 250 nodes and are overpowered. Testing indicates that the upgrade of the p5's to p6's and 6.2 will leave room to grow. All 6.2 servers are 32GB. The p7's are 2 CPU and the p6's are 4 CPU. All are allowed to steal CPU (LPARs are great). The disks are SAN attached, I am using real and imagined tape and disk pools. I do not dedup with TSM. Things to consider: 1. if you can complete your backups in the window you have enough network bandwidth 2. if you can complete expiration in a reasonable time you have enough CPU 3. if you can complete reclamation in a reasonable time you have enough storage bandwidth The hard part is all three can be affected by slow disk, not enough RAM and a busy CPU. Profile the current server and see where it is no longer performing to expectations and make sure that the weak points are addressed with the new hardware. If an upgrade from 5 to 6 is also happening make sure the new system addresses the change in DB. In my case the p5's are losing the expiration battle, the test runs with 6.2 on the p6 show great improvement in run time (faster CPU and some 6.2 improvements). I also found my network was staying busy longer during the backup window, so I doubled the bandwidth. In 2 weeks theory becomes reality. I am sure your situation is different, but I hope this helps. Others may have additions or other ideas. Andy Huebner -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Ballenger, Craig Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 3:08 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Tivoli Server Specs Please see below... -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Huebner,Andy,FORT WORTH,IT Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 10:38 AM To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Tivoli Server Specs A few details would help. 1. How many nodes - 380 2. How much data (total daily) - not sure, but the DB is 256 GB on the largest TSM instance. 3. Deduplication - No dedup. I have a pair of P7s with 32GB RAM that are running great. I have 4 P5s that are a bit overloaded that will be upgraded to P6 with 32GB RAM. No dedup and about 4,000 nodes total. Andy Huebner -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Ballenger, Craig Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 9:15 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] Tivoli Server Specs All, I am attempting to spec out a server(s) for TSM 6 and were wondering what hardware you folks are running it on. We were looking at the Power Series from IBM (POWER6/POWER7). Any info will help. Thanks, Craig Ballenger This e-mail (including any attachments) is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not an intended recipient or an authorized representative of an intended recipient, you are prohibited from using, copying or distributing the information in this e-mail or its attachments. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete all copies of this message and any attachments. Thank you. This e-mail (including any attachments) is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not an intended recipient or an authorized representative of an intended recipient, you are prohibited from using, copying or distributing the information in this e-mail or its attachments. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete all copies of this message and any attachments. Thank you.
Re: server to server dbbackup
It is possible with server to server communication... It would be good if you set up additional tsm instance on targer server, that additional instance should be sleeping instance of source tsm On 30 Apr 2012 20:22, Tim Brown tbr...@cenhud.com wrote: Can tsm 6.3 be used to backup servera database to a location on another tsm server serverb Thanks, Tim Brown Supervisor Computer Operations Central Hudson Gas Electric 284 South Ave Poughkeepsie, NY 12601 Email: mailto:tbr...@cenhud.com tbr...@cenhud.com mailto: tbr...@cenhud.com mailto:tbr...@cenhud.com Phone: 845-486-5643 Fax: 845-486-5921 Cell: 845-235-4255 This message contains confidential information and is only for the intended recipient. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this note and deleting all copies and attachments.
