Re: 6.3.3.000 server wont HALT
As I mentioned, initial startup showed messages about schema updates but the server itself doesn't become available/accessible until after that is completed. During my many test startup/shutdowns after Andy's initial response, I did see various messages about DB reorgs kicking in at various times but all were finished/idle when I do the halt. I have my "DR" server I am going to upgrade to 6.3.3.000 and I will do the first startup interactively to monitor what happens and see if it exhibits the same behaviour (and activate tracing, of course). On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Paul Zarnowski wrote: > Just a thought... Is it possible that immediately after you upgrade a TSM > server that there is some database conversion or reorganization that is > getting done, that takes some time, and which cannot be interrupted? And > that this could delay a HALT until the HALT thread can acquire locks? Just > a wild-ass guess... > > At 11:16 AM 12/4/2012, Andrew Raibeck wrote: > >Hi Zoltan, > > > >> It is now shutting down normally. > > > >This includes when you start the server normally, as a background process? > >Interesting... at this point I don't have anything more I can offer. If > you > >encounter this again, I would say to go ahead and open a PMR. It is > >possible that collecting the stack traces for one (next) occurrence will > be > >sufficient. We can better facilitate information exchange through the > >formal support process. > > > >Meanwhile, if I hear anything more (such as a confirmed APAR number), I'll > >post here. > > > >Best regards, > > > >Andy Raibeck > >IBM Software Group > >Tivoli Storage Manager Client Product Development > >Level 3 Team Lead > >Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Hartford/IBM@IBMUS > >Internet e-mail: stor...@us.ibm.com > > > >IBM Tivoli Storage Manager support web page: > > > http://www.ibm.com/support/entry/portal/Overview/Software/Tivoli/Tivoli_Storage_Manager > > > >"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 2012-12-04 > >10:58:29: > > > >> From: Zoltan Forray > >> To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu, > >> Date: 2012-12-04 11:03 > >> Subject: Re: 6.3.3.000 server wont HALT > >> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" > >> > >> Well, I don't get it. It is now shutting down normally. I have stopped > >> and restarted it 10-times (this is a test server) with no issues. The > >CPU > >> usage never spikes above 100% after I enter HALT. Then it is stopped > >> within 1-minute. > >> > >> I have another server I am going to upgrade from 6.2.3.0 to 6.3.3.000. > I > >> will be sure to perform the first startup manually and capture the logs > >and > >> start tracing as soon as I can, just in case it hangs like this one did. > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Schneider, Jim > >wrote: > >> > >> > I meant 'dsmadmc -id= -pass= -console' from a telnet/ssh > >session. > >> > It displays all console messages as they are generated. I use it to > >> > monitor the progress of long-running processes (deletion of > filespaces, > >> > macros that update volume access, etc.). > >> > > >> > Jim > >> > > >> > -Original Message- > >> > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf > >Of > >> > Zoltan Forray > >> > Sent: Monday, December 03, 2012 8:12 AM > >> > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > >> > Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] 6.3.3.000 server wont HALT > >> > > >> > Not sure what you mean by "console session". I use TSMManager and > >issue > >> > the halt via it's console/monitor window, if that is what you are > >referring > >> > to - and yes, it shows the halt is issued and then the server goes > >> > non-responsive, as suspected. Then from ssh/Linux the process dsmserv > >> > never halts/stops. > >> > > >> > > >> > On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Schneider, Jim > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > Have you tried a -console session prior to issuing halt? > >> > > > >> > > Jim Schneider > >> > > > >> > > -Original Message- > >> > > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On > Behalf > >> > > Of Zoltan Forray > >> > > Sent: Monday, December 03, 2012 7:45 AM > >> > > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > >> > > Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] 6.3.3.000 server wont HALT > >> > > > >> > > This is now becoming a consistent / persistent problem. I had to > >kill > >> > > -9 to stop the dsmserv process. I restarted the server (via > >service .. > >> > > start) and there didn't seem to be any damage done. > >> > > > >> > > However, attempting to stop/halt it, again, produced the same result > >- > >> > > dsmserv using 200% CPU and after 2-hours I had to kill -9. > >> > > > >> > > So, obviously there are big enough changes in 6.3.3 vs 6.3.2, to > >cause > >> > > problems like this, since none of my 6.3.x or 6.2.x servers exhibit > >> > > this behavior. > >> > > > >> > > Any suggestions on how to diagnose this "issue" before I contact IBM > >> > > and open a PMR? > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Zoltan Forray > >wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > Just did m
Re: issue with offsite reclamation
I run "reclaim stg offsitecopy thre=60 du=600" to kick off the process. Sometime I vary the duration or threshold but I still get this error every time and I get it almost continuously: ANRD Thread<32> issued message from: ANRD Thread<32> 07FEF7A56A99 OutDiagToCons()+159 ANRD Thread<32> 07FEF7A504EC outDiagfExt()+fc ANRD Thread<32> 07FEF74D63DC AfRclmOnsiteVols()+20fc ANRD Thread<32> 07FEF74D6B5F AfRclmVolumeThread()+1bf ANRD Thread<32> 07FEF72782A4 startThread()+124 ANRD Thread<32> 73211D9F endthreadex()+43 ANRD Thread<32> 73211E3B endthreadex()+df ANRD Thread<32> 76D5652D BaseThreadInitThunk()+d ANRD Thread<32> 76E8C521 RtlUserThreadStart()+21 ANRD_1147918115 RclmOffsiteVols(afrclm.c:2975) Thread<32>: Error 3051 queuing storage pool volumes for offsite reclamation. Offsite reclamation processing may be incomplete. Out of about 175 offsite tapes I have about 30-40 below the 55% mark. David Tyree Interface Analyst South Georgia Medical Center 229.333.1155 -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of James Choate Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 10:35 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] issue with offsite reclamation Hi David. When you run reclamation on your offsite volumes, what is the command you run? You also said you get a few tapes back, but that you get error. What error message are you constantly getting? And, last but not least, you mention that a lot of the offsite volumes have a percent utilization of less than 25%. I usually run the following query to show me what is reclaimable. select volume_name,stgpool_name,pct_utilized,PCT_RECLAIM from volumes where pct_reclaim>55 I usually reclaim tapes that have min of 55% - 60% reclaimable space. ~james -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Tyree, David Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 7:52 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: issue with offsite reclamation Sorry might be a misunderstanding here. I don't have an offsite server. I trying to do reclamation on offsite volumes or trying too. I get a few tapes back sometimes but I'm constantly getting that error message. A lot of the offsite volumes have a percent utilization of less than 25% that should be reclaiming. David Tyree Interface Analyst South Georgia Medical Center 229.333.1155 -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Arbogast, Warren K Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 9:34 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] issue with offsite reclamation David, If cartridges aren't coming back, you may need to run 'reconcile volumes' . Don't combine 'reconcile volumes' of a virtual-volume based copypool on the on-site server with reclamation of the primary target pool on the offsite server. tsm:> reconcile volumes fix=yes Keith Arbogast Indiana University
Re: issue with offsite reclamation
I just started a reclamation process to make sure but all I get is a message saying that the reclamation process started then the errors show up. Looks like call to IBM is next... David Tyree Interface Analyst South Georgia Medical Center 229.333.1155 -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Steven Langdale Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2012 9:15 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] issue with offsite reclamation David Absolutely no other messages jsut before the ANRD's? Either way, I think your looking at logging a call with IBM (if you've not already). Steven On 5 December 2012 13:22, Tyree, David wrote: > I run "reclaim stg offsitecopy thre=60 du=600" to kick off the process. > Sometime I vary the duration or threshold but I still get this error > every time and I get it almost continuously: > > ANRD Thread<32> issued message from: > ANRD Thread<32> 07FEF7A56A99 OutDiagToCons()+159 ANRD > Thread<32> 07FEF7A504EC outDiagfExt()+fc ANRD Thread<32> > 07FEF74D63DC AfRclmOnsiteVols()+20fc ANRD Thread<32> > 07FEF74D6B5F AfRclmVolumeThread()+1bf ANRD Thread<32> > 07FEF72782A4 startThread()+124 ANRD Thread<32> > 73211D9F endthreadex()+43 ANRD Thread<32> > 73211E3B endthreadex()+df ANRD Thread<32> > 76D5652D BaseThreadInitThunk()+d ANRD Thread<32> > 76E8C521 RtlUserThreadStart()+21 > ANRD_1147918115 RclmOffsiteVols(afrclm.c:2975) Thread<32>: Error > 3051 queuing storage pool volumes for offsite reclamation. Offsite > reclamation processing may be incomplete. > > Out of about 175 offsite tapes I have about 30-40 below the 55% mark. > > > > > David Tyree > Interface Analyst > South Georgia Medical Center > 229.333.1155 > > > -Original Message- > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf > Of James Choate > Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 10:35 AM > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] issue with offsite reclamation > > Hi David. > > When you run reclamation on your offsite volumes, what is the command > you run? > > You also said you get a few tapes back, but that you get error. > What error message are you constantly getting? > > And, last but not least, you mention that a lot of the offsite volumes > have a percent utilization of less than 25%. > I usually run the following query to show me what is reclaimable. > > select volume_name,stgpool_name,pct_utilized,PCT_RECLAIM from volumes > where pct_reclaim>55 > > I usually reclaim tapes that have min of 55% - 60% reclaimable space. > > ~james > > -Original Message- > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf > Of Tyree, David > Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 7:52 AM > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Subject: Re: issue with offsite reclamation > > Sorry might be a misunderstanding here. > I don't have an offsite server. I trying to do reclamation on offsite > volumes or trying too. > > I get a few tapes back sometimes but I'm constantly getting that error > message. A lot of the offsite volumes have a percent utilization of > less than 25% that should be reclaiming. > > > David Tyree > Interface Analyst > South Georgia Medical Center > 229.333.1155 > > > -Original Message- > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf > Of Arbogast, Warren K > Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 9:34 AM > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] issue with offsite reclamation > > David, > If cartridges aren't coming back, you may need to run 'reconcile volumes' > . Don't combine 'reconcile volumes' of a virtual-volume based copypool > on the on-site server with reclamation of the primary target pool on > the offsite server. > > tsm:> reconcile volumes fix=yes > > Keith Arbogast > Indiana University >
Re: issue with offsite reclamation
David Absolutely no other messages jsut before the ANRD's? Either way, I think your looking at logging a call with IBM (if you've not already). Steven On 5 December 2012 13:22, Tyree, David wrote: > I run "reclaim stg offsitecopy thre=60 du=600" to kick off the process. > Sometime I vary the duration or threshold but I still get this error every > time and I get it almost continuously: > > ANRD Thread<32> issued message from: > ANRD Thread<32> 07FEF7A56A99 OutDiagToCons()+159 > ANRD Thread<32> 07FEF7A504EC outDiagfExt()+fc > ANRD Thread<32> 07FEF74D63DC AfRclmOnsiteVols()+20fc > ANRD Thread<32> 07FEF74D6B5F AfRclmVolumeThread()+1bf > ANRD Thread<32> 07FEF72782A4 startThread()+124 > ANRD Thread<32> 73211D9F endthreadex()+43 > ANRD Thread<32> 73211E3B endthreadex()+df > ANRD Thread<32> 76D5652D BaseThreadInitThunk()+d > ANRD Thread<32> 76E8C521 RtlUserThreadStart()+21 > ANRD_1147918115 RclmOffsiteVols(afrclm.c:2975) Thread<32>: Error 3051 > queuing > storage pool volumes for offsite reclamation. Offsite reclamation > processing may be > incomplete. > > Out of about 175 offsite tapes I have about 30-40 below the 55% mark. > > > > > David Tyree > Interface Analyst > South Georgia Medical Center > 229.333.1155 > > > -Original Message- > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of > James Choate > Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 10:35 AM > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] issue with offsite reclamation > > Hi David. > > When you run reclamation on your offsite volumes, what is the command you > run? > > You also said you get a few tapes back, but that you get error. > What error message are you constantly getting? > > And, last but not least, you mention that a lot of the offsite volumes > have a percent utilization of less than 25%. > I usually run the following query to show me what is reclaimable. > > select volume_name,stgpool_name,pct_utilized,PCT_RECLAIM from volumes > where pct_reclaim>55 > > I usually reclaim tapes that have min of 55% - 60% reclaimable space. > > ~james > > -Original Message- > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of > Tyree, David > Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 7:52 AM > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Subject: Re: issue with offsite reclamation > > Sorry might be a misunderstanding here. > I don't have an offsite server. I trying to do reclamation on offsite > volumes or trying too. > > I get a few tapes back sometimes but I'm constantly getting that error > message. A lot of the offsite volumes have a percent utilization of less > than 25% that should be reclaiming. > > > David Tyree > Interface Analyst > South Georgia Medical Center > 229.333.1155 > > > -Original Message- > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of > Arbogast, Warren K > Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 9:34 AM > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] issue with offsite reclamation > > David, > If cartridges aren't coming back, you may need to run 'reconcile volumes' > . Don't combine 'reconcile volumes' of a virtual-volume based copypool on > the on-site server with reclamation of the primary target pool on the > offsite server. > > tsm:> reconcile volumes fix=yes > > Keith Arbogast > Indiana University >
Re: Monitor open volumes for a file deviceclass session
Keith, To do this accurately, it is necessary to build a kind of state map of sessions and processes and file/tape opens and closes. In the actlog, file/tape opens and closes are recorded with the volume name and linked to the session/process number that originated the request. (This session/process number can be tricky to trace back to a common node or process command. Proxies, LanFree, NDMP, etc. all add complexity.) Look for ANR0510I and ANR0511I, ANR0513I and ANR0514I messages, selecting an appropriate period (24 hours?) Keep the records sorted by session/process number and date and time. Every time a session/process has a volume open, increment the open count- check for new high point. Every time a session/process has a volume close, decrement the open count. I suggest Perl and csv formatted actlog selects. Richard -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Arbogast, Warren K Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 11:28 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] Monitor open volumes for a file deviceclass session To estimate the needed value for the 'numopenvolumesallowed' option for a deduplicated file deviceclass pool, the 6.3 Server Admin Reference Guide says to, " Monitor client sessions and server processes. Note the highest number of volumes open for a single session or process. Increase the setting of NUMOPENVOLSALLOWED if the highest number of open volumes is equal to the value specified by NUMOPENVOLSALLOWED." (page 1388) How does one see and correlate open volumes with sessions or processes on such a pool from within TSM? We're at server version 6.3.2 running on RHEL 5. Thank you, Keith Arbogast
Backupsets and deleted objects
Due to a discovery request, a department has come to us to retain all their backups, including any DELETE objects. They requests for us to create a backupset. But from what I have ready, this wont work since one an object has been deleted and RETO kicks in, it is no longer active. Is this understanding correct? So, if this is the case, do I understand correctly the only way to capture deleted objects is via an EXPORT? Thoughts? Suggestions? -- *Zoltan Forray* TSM Software & Hardware Administrator Virginia Commonwealth University UCC/Office of Technology Services zfor...@vcu.edu - 804-828-4807 Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will never use email to request that you reply with your password, social security number or confidential personal information. For more details visit http://infosecurity.vcu.edu/phishing.html
Re: Backupsets and deleted objects
You may generate backupset from point in time, so the older version of file will be placed on the tape, but still it will be one version only. Regards, Tomasz Hubicki Zoltan Forray pisze: Due to a discovery request, a department has come to us to retain all their backups, including any DELETE objects. They requests for us to create a backupset. But from what I have ready, this wont work since one an object has been deleted and RETO kicks in, it is no longer active. Is this understanding correct? So, if this is the case, do I understand correctly the only way to capture deleted objects is via an EXPORT? Thoughts? Suggestions? -- *Zoltan Forray* TSM Software & Hardware Administrator Virginia Commonwealth University UCC/Office of Technology Services zfor...@vcu.edu - 804-828-4807 Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will never use email to request that you reply with your password, social security number or confidential personal information. For more details visit http://infosecurity.vcu.edu/phishing.html
Re: Monitor open volumes for a file deviceclass session
Richard, Thank you for that detailed answer. It sounds difficult to track and map, and possibly difficult to correlate increases and decreses of numopenvolumesallowed with system throughput. TSM likes no easy answers. Best wishes, Keith
Re: Monitor open volumes for a file deviceclass session
How about just pick big (ish) number and keep an eye out for mount waits/failed jobs (i'm assuming you'll get a mount wait if the number isn't big enough - that may not be correct) Not scientific I know - but much easier :) Steven On 5 December 2012 19:09, Arbogast, Warren K wrote: > Richard, > Thank you for that detailed answer. It sounds difficult to track and map, > and possibly difficult to correlate increases and decreses of > numopenvolumesallowed with system throughput. TSM likes no easy answers. > > Best wishes, > Keith >
More files in copy pool than primary pool?
I'm running TSM 6.2.4.0 on AIX. How can a node have more files in the copy storagepool (nr-ofl) then in the primary storagepool (nr-pvl)? tsm: ULTSM>q occ idmtest5 Node Name Type Filespace FSID StorageNumber of Physical Logical Name Pool Name Files Space Space Occupied Occupied (MB) (MB) -- -- - -- - - - IDMTEST5 Bkup / 3 NR-OFL 141,877 7,498.54 6,189.31 IDMTEST5 Bkup / 3 NR-PVL 141,877 7,498.54 6,187.91 IDMTEST5 Bkup /boot 4 NR-OFL70 84.64 80.92 IDMTEST5 Bkup /boot 4 NR-PVL70 84.64 80.91 IDMTEST5 Bkup /u02 11 NR-OFL45,576 7,317.32 6,744.50 IDMTEST5 Bkup /u02 11 NR-PVL45,575 7,315.12 6,741.28 IDMTEST5 Bkup /u03 10 NR-OFL 8,003 1,082.73938.76 IDMTEST5 Bkup /u03 10 NR-PVL 8,001 1,082.20937.93 IDMTEST5 Bkup /u04 9 NR-OFL55,928 38,242.34 37,251.88 IDMTEST5 Bkup /u04 9 NR-PVL55,865 38,242.29 37,250.60
Re: More files in copy pool than primary pool?
how many pri stg pools do you have and what is hierarchy (next stg) the other thing is check expire inventory process for errors Chavdar On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 9:20 PM, Ehresman,David E. wrote: > I'm running TSM 6.2.4.0 on AIX. > > How can a node have more files in the copy storagepool (nr-ofl) then in the > primary storagepool (nr-pvl)? > > tsm: ULTSM>q occ idmtest5 > > Node Name Type Filespace FSID StorageNumber of Physical Logical > Name Pool Name Files Space Space >Occupied Occupied >(MB) (MB) > -- -- - -- - - - > IDMTEST5 Bkup / 3 NR-OFL 141,877 7,498.54 6,189.31 > IDMTEST5 Bkup / 3 NR-PVL 141,877 7,498.54 6,187.91 > IDMTEST5 Bkup /boot 4 NR-OFL70 84.64 80.92 > IDMTEST5 Bkup /boot 4 NR-PVL70 84.64 80.91 > IDMTEST5 Bkup /u02 11 NR-OFL45,576 7,317.32 6,744.50 > IDMTEST5 Bkup /u02 11 NR-PVL45,575 7,315.12 6,741.28 > IDMTEST5 Bkup /u03 10 NR-OFL 8,003 1,082.73938.76 > IDMTEST5 Bkup /u03 10 NR-PVL 8,001 1,082.20937.93 > IDMTEST5 Bkup /u04 9 NR-OFL55,928 38,242.34 37,251.88 > IDMTEST5 Bkup /u04 9 NR-PVL55,865 38,242.29 37,250.60
HSM 6.3 problem
Hi All, I am looking for opinion about HSM 6.3.0.1. After upgrade to HSM 6.3.0.1 form 6.1.4 and after that it stops to recall files. The configuration is two node cluster running on windows 2008 r2 Best regards Chavdar
Re: More files in copy pool than primary pool?
I think if you do a MOVE NODEDATA to migrate data from one primary pool to another, the data in the copy pool stays intact. I don't think there is a way to expire it other than through the normal node-prompted expiration. On 12/05/2012 11:20 AM, Ehresman,David E. wrote: > I'm running TSM 6.2.4.0 on AIX. > > How can a node have more files in the copy storagepool (nr-ofl) then in the > primary storagepool (nr-pvl)? > > tsm: ULTSM>q occ idmtest5 > > Node Name Type Filespace FSID StorageNumber of Physical Logical > Name Pool Name Files Space Space >Occupied Occupied >(MB) (MB) > -- -- - -- - - - > IDMTEST5 Bkup / 3 NR-OFL 141,877 7,498.54 6,189.31 > IDMTEST5 Bkup / 3 NR-PVL 141,877 7,498.54 6,187.91 > IDMTEST5 Bkup /boot 4 NR-OFL70 84.64 80.92 > IDMTEST5 Bkup /boot 4 NR-PVL70 84.64 80.91 > IDMTEST5 Bkup /u02 11 NR-OFL45,576 7,317.32 6,744.50 > IDMTEST5 Bkup /u02 11 NR-PVL45,575 7,315.12 6,741.28 > IDMTEST5 Bkup /u03 10 NR-OFL 8,003 1,082.73938.76 > IDMTEST5 Bkup /u03 10 NR-PVL 8,001 1,082.20937.93 > IDMTEST5 Bkup /u04 9 NR-OFL55,928 38,242.34 37,251.88 > IDMTEST5 Bkup /u04 9 NR-PVL55,865 38,242.29 37,250.60 > -- -- Skylar Thompson (skyl...@u.washington.edu) -- Genome Sciences Department, System Administrator -- Foege Building S048, (206)-685-7354 -- University of Washington School of Medicine
Re: -snapdiff incremental backups on Windows and include/exclude
Thanks very much! -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Clark, Margaret Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 3:15 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] -snapdiff incremental backups on Windows and include/exclude We run snapdiff backups using 6.2.4 client, 6.2.3.1 server, Ontap 7.3.3, and exclude and exclude.dir work as expected. - Margaret -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Prather, Wanda Sent: Monday, December 03, 2012 10:38 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] -snapdiff incremental backups on Windows and include/exclude Do: include exclude exclude.dir Work when you are doing an incremental with -snapdiff ? (Netapp Vfiler, TSM 6.4 client on Win2K8, Ontap 8.1, TSM 6.3.0 server on Win2K8) Thanks! Wanda Prather | Senior Technical Specialist | wanda.prat...@icfi.com | www.icfi.com ICF International | 401 E. Pratt St, Suite 2214, Baltimore, MD 21202 | 410.539.1135 (o)
SV: HSM 6.3 problem
Hi Chavdar, If you have any issues with the HSM then should you probably send more information. I have a GPFS/HSM issue with 6.4.0.0 where it calls back to much information. Best Regards Christian Svensson Cell: +46-70-325 1577 E-mail: christian.svens...@cristie.se Säkra återläsningar. -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: Chavdar Cholev [mailto:chavdar.cho...@gmail.com] Skickat: den 5 december 2012 23:14 Till: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Ämne: HSM 6.3 problem Hi All, I am looking for opinion about HSM 6.3.0.1. After upgrade to HSM 6.3.0.1 form 6.1.4 and after that it stops to recall files. The configuration is two node cluster running on windows 2008 r2 Best regards Chavdar
