Re: Activate SKLM on existing TS3500 partition

[J. Pohlmann]

Ben, most of my customer with LTO 4 or higher drives use TSM (application) 
managed encryption. It's simple to implement and there is no cost for licensing 
or additional software (ISKLM).
Regards,
Joerg Pohlmann

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of 
Alford, Ben
Sent: October 21, 2015 12:57
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Activate SKLM on existing TS3500 partition

ADSM folk - we have interested in tape encryption too but have not yet started. 
   Since our drives are only used by TSM, what are the pros/cons of using SKLM 
vs. the free TSM application support for encryption?

Ben Alford
University of Tennessee

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Plair, 
Ricky
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2015 3:45 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Activate SKLM on existing TS3500 partition

Hey Maurice,

Did anyone reply to your email?

We are performing about the same thing. We have the SKLM server built and we 
are migrating from EKM.

Rick

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of 
Maurice van 't Loo
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2015 8:29 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Activate SKLM on existing TS3500 partition

Friends,

We currently have TSM 7.1.1.3 with TS3500's and LTO6 drives in use.
SLKM server is build and tested successfully.

Now we want to activate tape encryption.

Can we just activate it on the library partition that is already in use?
Will it start using encryption when a new scratch tape is used? Or when we 
relabel a volumes?  (relabel scratch)

Thanks,
Maurice van 't Loo

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any attachments, is for 
the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and 
privileged information and/or Protected Health Information (PHI) subject to 
protection under the law, including the Health Insurance Portability and 
Accountability Act of 1996, as amended (HIPAA). If you are not the intended 
recipient or the person responsible for delivering the email to the intended 
recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and that any 
use, disclosure, distribution, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email 
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify 
the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the original message.

Re: Activate SKLM on existing TS3500 partition

[Kevin Boatright]

Once you enable encryption on the tape library, it will encrypt the data as it 
mounts the scratch tapes.

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Plair, 
Ricky
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2015 3:45 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Activate SKLM on existing TS3500 partition

Hey Maurice,

Did anyone reply to your email?

We are performing about the same thing. We have the SKLM server built and we 
are migrating from EKM.

Rick

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of 
Maurice van 't Loo
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2015 8:29 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Activate SKLM on existing TS3500 partition

Friends,

We currently have TSM 7.1.1.3 with TS3500's and LTO6 drives in use.
SLKM server is build and tested successfully.

Now we want to activate tape encryption.

Can we just activate it on the library partition that is already in use?
Will it start using encryption when a new scratch tape is used? Or when we 
relabel a volumes?  (relabel scratch)

Thanks,
Maurice van 't Loo

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any attachments, is for 
the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and 
privileged information and/or Protected Health Information (PHI) subject to 
protection under the law, including the Health Insurance Portability and 
Accountability Act of 1996, as amended (HIPAA). If you are not the intended 
recipient or the person responsible for delivering the email to the intended 
recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and that any 
use, disclosure, distribution, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email 
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify 
the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the original message.
"This electronic mail message contains information which may be confidential, 
privileged and protected from further disclosure. Such information relates to 
and is used for all purposes outlined in the statutes below, including Peer 
Review, Performance Improvement, Quality Assurance and Claims Management and 
Handling functions and/or Attorney-Client Communications. It is being produced 
within the scope of all Georgia and Federal laws governing record 
confidentiality, including (but not limited to) Official Code of Georgia 
Annotated Sections 31-7-15; 31-7-130; 31-7-131; 31-7-132; 31-7-133; 31-7-140; 
31-7-143. If you are not the intended recipient, please be aware that any 
disclosure, photocopying, distribution or use of the contents of the received 
information is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please 
reply to the sender immediately and permanently delete this message and all 
copies of it. Thank you. Communication of electronic protected health 
information (ePHI) is protected under the Health Insurance Portability and 
Accountability Act (HIPAA) Act of 1996. Electronic mail (e-mail) communication 
is not encrypted or secure. The HIPAA Security Rule allows for patients to 
initiate communication of personal health information over this medium and for 
providers to respond accordingly with the understanding that privacy of 
communication is not guaranteed."

Re: Activate SKLM on existing TS3500 partition

[Alford, Ben]

ADSM folk - we have interested in tape encryption too but have not yet started. 
   Since our drives are only used by TSM, what are the pros/cons of using SKLM 
vs. the free TSM application support for encryption?

Ben Alford
University of Tennessee

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Plair, 
Ricky
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2015 3:45 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Activate SKLM on existing TS3500 partition

Hey Maurice,

Did anyone reply to your email?

We are performing about the same thing. We have the SKLM server built and we 
are migrating from EKM.

Rick

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of 
Maurice van 't Loo
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2015 8:29 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Activate SKLM on existing TS3500 partition

Friends,

We currently have TSM 7.1.1.3 with TS3500's and LTO6 drives in use.
SLKM server is build and tested successfully.

Now we want to activate tape encryption.

Can we just activate it on the library partition that is already in use?
Will it start using encryption when a new scratch tape is used? Or when we 
relabel a volumes?  (relabel scratch)

Thanks,
Maurice van 't Loo

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any attachments, is for 
the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and 
privileged information and/or Protected Health Information (PHI) subject to 
protection under the law, including the Health Insurance Portability and 
Accountability Act of 1996, as amended (HIPAA). If you are not the intended 
recipient or the person responsible for delivering the email to the intended 
recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and that any 
use, disclosure, distribution, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email 
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify 
the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the original message.

Re: Activate SKLM on existing TS3500 partition

[Plair, Ricky]

Hey Maurice,

Did anyone reply to your email?

We are performing about the same thing. We have the SKLM server built and we 
are migrating from EKM.

Rick

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of 
Maurice van 't Loo
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2015 8:29 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Activate SKLM on existing TS3500 partition

Friends,

We currently have TSM 7.1.1.3 with TS3500's and LTO6 drives in use.
SLKM server is build and tested successfully.

Now we want to activate tape encryption.

Can we just activate it on the library partition that is already in use?
Will it start using encryption when a new scratch tape is used? Or when we 
relabel a volumes?  (relabel scratch)

Thanks,
Maurice van 't Loo

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any attachments, is for 
the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and 
privileged information and/or Protected Health Information (PHI) subject to 
protection under the law, including the Health Insurance Portability and 
Accountability Act of 1996, as amended (HIPAA). If you are not the intended 
recipient or the person responsible for delivering the email to the intended 
recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and that any 
use, disclosure, distribution, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email 
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify 
the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the original message.

Re: SRM and TDP/VE?

[Storer, Raymond]

Mike, I finally found the document referencing TSM/VE vCenter manual install 
and remove commands.  I hope you find it useful.

http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21609665

Ray

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Ryder, 
Michael S
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2015 9:48 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] SRM and TDP/VE?

Folks

We use VMware SRM (Site Recovery Manager), where we have 2 vCenters running
in an active-active failover scenario.

If I failover all my nodes from a source vCenter to another target vcenter,
now TDP for VE is "broken" because now the nodes are running under another
vCenter and the proxy relationships are not in place.

AND, even though I try to get a Datamover proxy relationship in place using
the source datamover and the target datacenter... the proxy relationship
won't stick even though the command doesn't return an error.

Has anyone got any tips & tricks for doing this?

Best regards,

Mike , x7942
RMD IT Client Services 



CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and any attachments are for the
exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
reliance upon this message. If you have received this in error, please
notify us immediately by return email and promptly delete this message
and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
message.

Re: exchange 2010 DAG

[Remco Post]

> Op 21 okt. 2015, om 04:47 heeft Tian Miao Liu  het 
> volgende geschreven:
> 
> Hi, Remco:
> 
>   The perform doesn't sounds right. What is your TSM server version?

Hi Tian,


we’re at 7.1.1.100 and about to upgrade to version 7.1.1.300 (due this Monday 
for this server). TDP is version 7.1.2.0, as is the BA client. 

> The issue you described is similiar to APAR IC86558, can you check if your
> TSM server has been updated with recent hotfix?
> 
> IC86558: TIVOLI STORAGE MANAGER SERVER NEEDS TO MUCH TIME TO RESPOND ON
> QUERIES FROM DATA PROTECTION FOR EXCHANGE.
> http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1IC86558
> 

which should not apply to us, given the version we’re at. Unless you have 
reasons to believe otherwise?

> 
> 
>   Regarding your question about multiple DAG NODE, Here are several
> suggestions that for your consideration:
> 
> 1. A single DAG node has the benefit to share backup data for all Exchange
> servers. For example, any Exchange server in the DAG can see backups from
> other servers, and it can perform restore operation using backups from
> other servers.
> 
> 2. A single DAG node can also share mailbox history information for all
> Exchange servers. In mailbox restore operations, user can operate on all
> the mailboxes in the DAG from any Exchange server in the DAG.
> 
> 3. If customer's Exchange servers are separated into different groups
> (e.g. some servers are in city_A, other servers are in city_B. DAG copies
> of the same database only reside in the same city. And city_A and city_B
> does not need to share backup data.), then it's ok to use different DAG
> nodes for the different groups of servers.
> 
> 4. After changing the DAG node, if you want to restore an old backup, you
> need to change back to the old DAG node to view the old backup and restore
> it.
> 

Thanks for your input.

> 
> Best regards.
> Tian Miao Liu

-- 

 Met vriendelijke groeten/Kind Regards,

Remco Post
r.p...@plcs.nl
+31 6 248 21 622