Re: integration TSM with Openstack

[Remco Post]

Hi,

you will only need TSM B/A. TSM4VE provides nothing useful in a (KVM based) 
openstack environment.

> On 10 Jan 2017, at 13:12, Anderson Douglas  wrote:
> 
> Hello
> 
> 
> We will start inititial configurations to integration TSM with Openstack
> I want to know if i must have TDP for VE to realize this integration???
> 
> In this link its seens to simple, need only BA Client
> 
> http://docs.openstack.org/liberty/config-reference/content/tsm-backup-driver.html
> 
> --
> -
> Anderson

-- 

 Met vriendelijke groeten/Kind Regards,

Remco Post
r.p...@plcs.nl
+31 6 248 21 622

integration TSM with Openstack

[Anderson Douglas]

Hello


We will start inititial configurations to integration TSM with Openstack
I want to know if i must have TDP for VE to realize this integration???

In this link its seens to simple, need only BA Client

http://docs.openstack.org/liberty/config-reference/content/tsm-backup-driver.html

--
-
Anderson

Re: 8.1 Linux client and IT13701 causing heartburn

[Heinz Flemming]

According to Zoltan Forray
> Thanks you for confirming this and opening the PMR.
>
> I have passed the "workaround" to the user who first discovered the "issue"
> to see if it fixes his problem.  I hope a patch comes out soon that allows
> us to choose this upper-limit.
>
> Can you post the PMR number so we can follow it?

PMR 63214,073,724

IBM will open an APAR.


Greetings, Heinz

--
Karlsruher Institut fuer Technologie (KIT)
Steinbuch Centre for Computing (SCC)

Heinz Flemming
Scientific Data Management (SDM)

76131 Karlsruhe
E-Mail: heinz.flemm...@kit.edu
www.scc.kit.edu
--

Re: Spectrum Protect for Virtual Environments version 8.1.0 sets speed records

[Stefan Folkerts]

Alex, I think it's not possible to reply to your mail to the list, I can
reply to others but when I reply to you it gets rejected due to images with
just plain text in the mail. Maybe you want to change your signature for
mails towards this list and see if that fixes it.

On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 11:08 AM, Stefan Folkerts  wrote:

> Okay, it rejected my first and second reply to Alex due to images. (did
> not have an image in my mail)
> No idea why but here is my third attempt, a reply to an earlier post.
>
> So here are some more specs Alex.
>
> Compute is somewhat based on the M model (16 cores, 192GB memory) you will
> find in the Linux 2.3 blueprints, but with internal read intensive SSD's in
> the server on a very fast internal controller for DB & active log.
> OS is SLES12 build with filesystem layout and types according to the
> blueprints.
> Spectrum Protect storage is an IBM V3700 (non turbo) with 36 nearline
> drives.
> Spectrum Protect server version 7.1.7 with containerpools (compression
> enabled)
> No collocation in use of course.
> And a bit of tuning of the Linux server and Linux datamovers for the IP
> stack and memory usage.
>
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 8:18 PM, Stefan Folkerts  > wrote:
>
>> Running 6.0u2 without further updates for testing.
>>
>> On Mon, 9 Jan 2017 at 20:13, Alex Jaimes  wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Stefan, what version of ESXi host are you running?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Alex
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 12:34 PM, Stefan Folkerts <
>>> stefan.folke...@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> > Server still on 7.1.7
>>>
>>> >
>>>
>>> > On Mon, 9 Jan 2017 at 19:33, David Ehresman <
>>> david.ehres...@louisville.edu
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>> >
>>>
>>> > > Did you upgrade your server to TSM 8.1 when you upgraded VME to
>>> 8.1?  Or
>>>
>>> > > is the server still running 7.1?
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > > David
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > > -Original Message-
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On
>>> Behalf Of
>>>
>>> > > Stefan Folkerts
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > > Sent: Monday, January 09, 2017 1:01 PM
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > > Subject: [ADSM-L] Spectrum Protect for Virtual Environments version
>>> 8.1.0
>>>
>>> > > sets speed records
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > > Hi guy's,
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > > I don't know if all of you realise what kind of gigantic performance
>>> step
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > > IBM has made with the new version of Spectrum Protect for Virtual
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > > Environments for VMware but I think it's pretty incredible.
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > > The magic parameter is VMMAXRESTORESESSION.
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > > See the results below, 1 session was the max that 7.x could do, see
>>> the
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > > speeds below when I crank up the sessions.
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > > Remember, this is restoring a single VM on a single datamover using
>>>
>>> > HOTADD.
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > > 10 is the max setting for this value, i'm interested to know if you
>>> guy's
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > > are seeing the same kind of results.
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > > Oh, and the upgrade was a breeze, if you aren't using the tagging
>>>
>>> > features
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > > it's just next next finish and the restores go so much faster.
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > > =
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > > 1 session
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > > =
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > > Total number of objects restored: 1
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > > Total number of objects failed:   0
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > > Total number of bytes transferred:   104.23 GB
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > > Data transfer time:1,926.99 sec
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > > Network data transfer rate:   56,714.31 KB/sec
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > > Aggregate data transfer rate: 47,888.47 KB/sec
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > > Elapsed processing time:   00:38:02
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > > real38m4.098s
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > > user1m14.476s
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > > sys 5m59.144s
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > > =
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > > 

Re: Spectrum Protect for Virtual Environments version 8.1.0 sets speed records

[Stefan Folkerts]

Okay, it rejected my first and second reply to Alex due to images. (did not
have an image in my mail)
No idea why but here is my third attempt, a reply to an earlier post.

So here are some more specs Alex.

Compute is somewhat based on the M model (16 cores, 192GB memory) you will
find in the Linux 2.3 blueprints, but with internal read intensive SSD's in
the server on a very fast internal controller for DB & active log.
OS is SLES12 build with filesystem layout and types according to the
blueprints.
Spectrum Protect storage is an IBM V3700 (non turbo) with 36 nearline
drives.
Spectrum Protect server version 7.1.7 with containerpools (compression
enabled)
No collocation in use of course.
And a bit of tuning of the Linux server and Linux datamovers for the IP
stack and memory usage.

On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 8:18 PM, Stefan Folkerts 
wrote:

> Running 6.0u2 without further updates for testing.
>
> On Mon, 9 Jan 2017 at 20:13, Alex Jaimes  wrote:
>
>> Hello Stefan, what version of ESXi host are you running?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>>
>> Alex
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 12:34 PM, Stefan Folkerts <
>> stefan.folke...@gmail.com>
>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > Server still on 7.1.7
>>
>> >
>>
>> > On Mon, 9 Jan 2017 at 19:33, David Ehresman <
>> david.ehres...@louisville.edu
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >
>>
>> > > Did you upgrade your server to TSM 8.1 when you upgraded VME to 8.1?
>> Or
>>
>> > > is the server still running 7.1?
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > > David
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > > -Original Message-
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On
>> Behalf Of
>>
>> > > Stefan Folkerts
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > > Sent: Monday, January 09, 2017 1:01 PM
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > > Subject: [ADSM-L] Spectrum Protect for Virtual Environments version
>> 8.1.0
>>
>> > > sets speed records
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > > Hi guy's,
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > > I don't know if all of you realise what kind of gigantic performance
>> step
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > > IBM has made with the new version of Spectrum Protect for Virtual
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > > Environments for VMware but I think it's pretty incredible.
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > > The magic parameter is VMMAXRESTORESESSION.
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > > See the results below, 1 session was the max that 7.x could do, see
>> the
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > > speeds below when I crank up the sessions.
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > > Remember, this is restoring a single VM on a single datamover using
>>
>> > HOTADD.
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > > 10 is the max setting for this value, i'm interested to know if you
>> guy's
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > > are seeing the same kind of results.
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > > Oh, and the upgrade was a breeze, if you aren't using the tagging
>>
>> > features
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > > it's just next next finish and the restores go so much faster.
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > > =
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > > 1 session
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > > =
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > > Total number of objects restored: 1
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > > Total number of objects failed:   0
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > > Total number of bytes transferred:   104.23 GB
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > > Data transfer time:1,926.99 sec
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > > Network data transfer rate:   56,714.31 KB/sec
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > > Aggregate data transfer rate: 47,888.47 KB/sec
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > > Elapsed processing time:   00:38:02
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > > real38m4.098s
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > > user1m14.476s
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > > sys 5m59.144s
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > > =
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > > 2 sessions
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > > =
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > > Total number of objects restored: 1
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > > Total number of objects failed:   0
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > > Total number of bytes transferred:   104.23 GB
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > > Data transfer time:2,070.76 sec
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > > Network data transfer rate:   52,776.80 KB/sec
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > >
>>
>> > > Aggregate 

Re: Spectrum Protect for Virtual Environments version 8.1.0 sets speed records

[Jacques Van Den Ende]

Hi,

Can you details your back-end storage pool : VTL - TAPES - DISK ?
What about your collocation settings ?
What about your performance parameters ?



Regards,

Jacques Van den Ende
Advisory IT Specialist


Phone: 352-360-385 x322 | Mobile: 32-475 29 43 87
E-mail: jacques_van_den_e...@be.ibm.com


89c rue pafenbruch
Capellen, 8308
Luxembourg



Tenzij hierboven anders aangegeven: / Sauf indication contraire ci-dessus: 
/ Unless otherwise stated above:

International Business Machines of Belgium sprl / bvba
Siège social / Maatschappelijke zetel: Avenue du Bourget 42 Bourgetlaan, 
B-1130 Bruxelles/Brussel
N° d'entreprise / Ondernemingsnr: TVA / BTW BE 0405 912 336
RPM Bruxelles / RPR Brussel