Re: behavior of existing data when excluding a vm
I usually do a Backup Set of the node. https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSGSG7_7.1.0/com.ibm.itsm.srv.doc/c_mngdata_mkclibckupsets.html I do this for all legal holds. And it's a standalone set of tape or some other media type. JoeA Joseph Abbott, Tivoli Storage Manager Architect CDP Partners Healthcare AR- 12W60.03 ITS Server & Storage Engineering Office: 857 -282-3681| Cell:617-633-8471 | Pager: 36364 Need assistance for a non-urgent issue? Open a Service Desk ticket online. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Schneider, Jim Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2018 10:24 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] behavior of existing data when excluding a vm External Email - Use Caution I don't know how to freeze existing backups. I rename the server in vCenter and run a backup using the new name. Rename to original after the backup. This will preserve the new backup. Jim Schneider -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Lee, Gary Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2018 9:01 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] behavior of existing data when excluding a vm Tsm server v7.1.7.1, client 7.1.6.4. Unsure of TSM for VE version. I need to freeze the backups of a VM in their current state as of today. I can exclude the vm from backup. However, will this act like an exclude and cause all backups to become inactive? If so, how to stop backing up a VM but leave its existing backups alone. ** Information contained in this e-mail message and in any attachments thereto is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy this message, delete any copies held on your systems, notify the sender immediately, and refrain from using or disclosing all or any part of its content to any other person. The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Re: How to backup ISILON storage
I agree with Remco 100%. If you can stay away from NDMP. We have a large Isilon environment which we backup with TSM/NDMP. It run very long, is absolutely horrific for restores. We are making the switch over to Isilon snapshots and replication both native to the Isilon. These solutions outperform TSM/NDMP tenfold. JoeA Joseph Abbott, Tivoli Storage Manager Architect CDP Partners Healthcare AR- 12W60.03 ITS Server & Storage Engineering Office: 857 -282-3681| Cell:617-633-8471 | Pager: 36364 Need assistance for a non-urgent issue? Open a Service Desk ticket online. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Remco Post Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2018 4:17 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] How to backup ISILON storage > On 7 Feb 2018, at 21:26, Zoltan Forraywrote: > > As you recall, we have been trying to figure out an alternative method > to backing up DFS mounted ISILON storage since the current method of > 80+ separate nodes accessed via the Web interface of the BA client is > going away. Plus the backups are taking soo long, we have to > determine a better way. > > So, doing some digging, one solution that seems to be touted is using > NDMP. > > We have absolutely zero experience with NDMP and are looking for some > guidance / cookbook / real-world experiences on how we would use NDMP > to backup ISILON storage (>400TB and hundreds of millions of files) > and make it accessible so someone from a help-desk like environment > could handle file-level restores! I don’t like TSM NDMP one bit, and I guess it’s no worse than any of the other backup vendors’ implementations, because NDMP is just what it is, and that is not much. I would seriously look into some form of async replication native to ISILON, something like netapp's snapvault, first. Yes that requires a a huge pile of disk just for backup, but it will probably be worth it. Even if the investment is quite high. Don’t forget with TSM terabyte licenses you’ll be paying a lot (a huge lot!) to IBM for your NDMP backups. You can basically NDMP via LAN and via SAN. The latter has the disadvantage that the TSM server running the backups must be the library manager for those tape drives. I would have loved to see that IBM would make NDMP and Library Managers play nice, but alas… NDMP via LAN allows you to use normal disk and tape based storage pools, via SAN you’ll need to create a separate tape pool in the right format (ndmpdump). Also, you can’t run copy storage pool on those is you use SAN. On 8.1.2 and higher (if you dare go there) you could even use directory containers. The current customer has NAS systems which share directories (called virtual volumes) rather than separate file systems. To be able to make a more granular backup/restore they use virtualfsmappings in TSM. This works surprisingly well. Now a huge NAS file system becomes (usually) a far more manageable directory. So not 200 TB in one huge lump to backup, but mostly directories of under 1 TB. The backups are slow, but on average manageable. We have a few exceptions that we backup via the share because they are just too big to manage via NDMP. Problem with NDMP is that if (with TSM 8.1) a single transaction spans more than 90% of the active log, the transaction gets killed by TSM. This is on average a good thing, but that makes the combination of a busy TSM server with loads of files and NDMP not a happy one, at least not for those few huge virtual volumes. So basically: - look at other solutions (snapvault or whatever it’s called for your NAS) - then again look at those solutions - virtualfsmappings might make things more manageable if you decide to go with TSM anyway - SAN and LAN both have disadvantages, neither one is perfect - maybe a dedicated TSM instance to avoid issues with long running ndmp dumps > > Or if NDMP is the wrong direction, please tell us so. > -- > *Zoltan Forray* > Spectrum Protect (p.k.a. TSM) Software & Hardware Administrator Xymon > Monitor Administrator VMware Administrator Virginia Commonwealth > University UCC/Office of Technology Services www.ucc.vcu.edu > zfor...@vcu.edu - 804-828-4807 Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and > other reputable organizations will never use email to request that you > reply with your password, social security number or confidential > personal information. For more details visit http://phishing.vcu.edu/ -- Met vriendelijke groeten/Kind Regards, Remco Post r.p...@plcs.nl +31 6 248 21 622 The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
Re: dsm.opt file being corrupted/blanked
We did not test replication with this round of clients. I agree only replication would need to touch the OPT files. JoeA Joseph Abbott, Tivoli Storage Manager Architect CDP Partners Healthcare AR- 12W60.03 ITS Server & Storage Engineering Office: 857 -282-3681| Cell:617-633-8471 | Pager: 36364 Need assistance for a non-urgent issue? Open a Service Desk ticket online. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Zoltan Forray Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2018 12:17 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] dsm.opt file being corrupted/blanked Did your testing involve replication? AFAIK nothing should be changing/updating the dsm.opt file except for replication so that is my only clue. Since we first started trying to use replication with 6.3.5, there have been many fixes to numerous problems with replication - many of which we experienced to the point we gave up on replication until we upgraded everything to 7.1.x On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 10:51 AM, Abbott, Joseph <jabb...@partners.org> wrote: > We ran extensive testing on the 7.1.0 code and never saw this issue. > Not saying the 0 base is not your issue but just haven't seen it. > > We have 7.1.6 out in the wild now and also have not seen this issue. > > JoeA > > Joseph Abbott, Tivoli Storage Manager Architect CDP Partners > Healthcare AR- 12W60.03 ITS Server & Storage Engineering > Office: 857 -282-3681| Cell:617-633-8471 | Pager: 36364 Need > assistance for a non-urgent issue? Open a Service Desk ticket online. > > -Original Message- > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf > Of Zoltan Forray > Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2018 10:05 AM > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Subject: [ADSM-L] dsm.opt file being corrupted/blanked > > Folks, > > Wondering if anyone has seen this issue. The first time I saw it a few > months back, I ignored it as a one-time issue. But it just happened > again so I am digging deeper. > > This time (don't recall what the OS/client version was for the first > incident) it is a Windows 2008 R2 server with BA 7.1.0.0 (yes I know - > 0-releases are always problematic). > > OS tech noticed the backups failing and went to investigate. Trying > to start the CLI - it hung. Checked the dsm.opt file and found it > blank/empty? It has been backing up for a long, long time with no > reason to make any changes to the dsm.opt file. > > AFAIK, the only thing that should be mucking with the dsm.opt file, > aside from manually editing it, is replication. So, is this > replication related or a client bug? Did some quick Googling without > any luck on a known problem/fix. > > -- > *Zoltan Forray* > Spectrum Protect (p.k.a. TSM) Software & Hardware Administrator Xymon > Monitor Administrator VMware Administrator Virginia Commonwealth > University UCC/Office of Technology Services www.ucc.vcu.edu > zfor...@vcu.edu - > 804-828-4807 Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable > organizations will never use email to request that you reply with your > password, social security number or confidential personal information. > For more details visit http://phishing.vcu.edu/ > > > The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom > it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error > and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the > Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline > . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient > information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the > e-mail. > -- *Zoltan Forray* Spectrum Protect (p.k.a. TSM) Software & Hardware Administrator Xymon Monitor Administrator VMware Administrator Virginia Commonwealth University UCC/Office of Technology Services www.ucc.vcu.edu zfor...@vcu.edu - 804-828-4807 Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will never use email to request that you reply with your password, social security number or confidential personal information. For more details visit http://phishing.vcu.edu/
Re: dsm.opt file being corrupted/blanked
We ran extensive testing on the 7.1.0 code and never saw this issue. Not saying the 0 base is not your issue but just haven't seen it. We have 7.1.6 out in the wild now and also have not seen this issue. JoeA Joseph Abbott, Tivoli Storage Manager Architect CDP Partners Healthcare AR- 12W60.03 ITS Server & Storage Engineering Office: 857 -282-3681| Cell:617-633-8471 | Pager: 36364 Need assistance for a non-urgent issue? Open a Service Desk ticket online. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Zoltan Forray Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2018 10:05 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] dsm.opt file being corrupted/blanked Folks, Wondering if anyone has seen this issue. The first time I saw it a few months back, I ignored it as a one-time issue. But it just happened again so I am digging deeper. This time (don't recall what the OS/client version was for the first incident) it is a Windows 2008 R2 server with BA 7.1.0.0 (yes I know - 0-releases are always problematic). OS tech noticed the backups failing and went to investigate. Trying to start the CLI - it hung. Checked the dsm.opt file and found it blank/empty? It has been backing up for a long, long time with no reason to make any changes to the dsm.opt file. AFAIK, the only thing that should be mucking with the dsm.opt file, aside from manually editing it, is replication. So, is this replication related or a client bug? Did some quick Googling without any luck on a known problem/fix. -- *Zoltan Forray* Spectrum Protect (p.k.a. TSM) Software & Hardware Administrator Xymon Monitor Administrator VMware Administrator Virginia Commonwealth University UCC/Office of Technology Services www.ucc.vcu.edu zfor...@vcu.edu - 804-828-4807 Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will never use email to request that you reply with your password, social security number or confidential personal information. For more details visit http://phishing.vcu.edu/ The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Re: How to setup dedicated tape drives for storage agent
Yes this will work and we use it now with our LanFree client. My suggestion would be to create two libraries rather than splitting the drives in half. Each library with 32 drives would work. Ron is correct in suggesting the use of a library manager configuration. This works best for us. I would also ask the same question as Ron. Why so many drives for the LAN free client? We move 25TB per night with 15 drives on a data domain 890. JoeA Joseph A Abbott MCSE/MCTS 2003/2008R2, MCSA/MCTS 2003/2008R2 Tivoli Storage Manager Architect CDP jabb...@partners.org Cell-617-633-8471 Desk-617-724-4929 Page-# 36364 The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Re: NAS Restore failure, any thoughts?
You'll need to look at the NDMP logs on you NAS device. Normally when I see this type of message it's a NAS issue. Sent from my iPad On Aug 24, 2012, at 8:59 AM, Moyer, Joni M joni.mo...@highmark.com wrote: Hi Jeff, Here is the everything associated with that process. Any ideas? Thanks again! Date/Time Message -- 08/23/12 13:55:54 ANR0984I Process 23348 for RESTORE NAS (SELECTIVE) started in the BACKGROUND at 13:55:54. (SESSION: 55984, PROCESS: 23348) 08/23/12 13:55:54 ANR1059I Selective restore of NAS node VNX5481_NAS_3, file system /root_vdm_12/HMCH1026_I_bkup, started as process 23348 by administrator LIDZR8V. Specified files and/or directory trees will be restored to destination /temp_3. (SESSION: 55984, PROCESS: 23348) 08/23/12 13:55:54 ANR0403I Session 55984 ended for node VNX5481_NAS_3 (TSMNAS). (SESSION: 55984, PROCESS: 23348) 08/23/12 13:56:22 ANR8337I NAS volume QA0258 mounted in drive LTO5_5 (c256t0l0). (SESSION: 55984, PROCESS: 23348) 08/23/12 13:56:22 ANR0512I Process 23348 opened input volume QA0258. (SESSION: 55984, PROCESS: 23348) 08/23/12 13:57:16 ANR0515I Process 23348 closed volume QA0258. (SESSION: 55984, PROCESS: 23348) 08/23/12 13:58:18 ANR8468I NAS volume QA0258 dismounted from drive LTO5_5 (c256t0l0) in library NAS_QI6000_ONSITE. (SESSION: 55984, PROCESS: 23348) 08/23/12 13:58:44 ANR8337I NAS volume QA0265 mounted in drive LTO5_4 (c272t0l0). (SESSION: 55984, PROCESS: 23348) 08/23/12 13:58:44 ANR0512I Process 23348 opened input volume QA0265. (SESSION: 55984, PROCESS: 23348) 08/23/12 14:01:28 ANRD_3279216401 ssRtrvRemote(ssremote.c:1811) Thread175705: Invalid offset 755.1600443456 for image restore(SESSION: 55984, PROCESS: 23348) 08/23/12 14:01:28 ANRD Thread175705 issued message from: (SESSION: 55984, PROCESS: 23348) 08/23/12 14:01:28 ANRD Thread175705 0001c7e8 StdPutText (SESSION: 55984, PROCESS: 23348) 08/23/12 14:01:28 ANRD Thread175705 0001fb90 OutDiagToCons (SESSION: 55984, PROCESS: 23348) 08/23/12 14:01:28 ANRD Thread175705 0001a2d0 outDiagfExt (SESSION: 55984, PROCESS: 23348) 08/23/12 14:01:28 ANRD Thread175705 0001004f8ab8 ssRtrvRemote (SESSION: 55984, PROCESS: 23348) 08/23/12 14:01:28 ANRD Thread175705 0001007f9838 AfRtrvRemoteThr- ead (SESSION: 55984, PROCESS: 23348) 08/23/12 14:01:28 ANRD Thread175705 00010001509c StartThread (SESSION: 55984, PROCESS: 23348) 08/23/12 14:01:28 ANR1078E NAS Restore process 23348 terminated - internal server error detected. (SESSION: 55984, PROCESS: 23348) 08/23/12 14:01:28 ANRD Thread175705 issued message 1078 from: (SESSION: 55984, PROCESS: 23348) 08/23/12 14:01:28 ANRD Thread175705 0001e138 StdPutMsg (SESSION: 55984, PROCESS: 23348) 08/23/12 14:01:28 ANRD Thread175705 000100013cd8 outRptf (SESSION: 55984, PROCESS: 23348) 08/23/12 14:01:28 ANRD Thread175705 0001007f81e4 EndRemoteProc (SESSION: 55984, PROCESS: 23348) 08/23/12 14:01:28 ANRD Thread175705 0001007f98f0 AfRtrvRemoteThr- ead (SESSION: 55984, PROCESS: 23348) 08/23/12 14:01:28 ANRD Thread175705 00010001509c StartThread (SESSION: 55984, PROCESS: 23348) 08/23/12 14:01:28 ANR0988I Process
Re: multi-threaded Exchange backups
Having the same issue. Would be great to get a look at your script. JoeA Joseph A Abbott MCSE/MCTS 2003/2008R2, MCSA/MCTS 2003/2008R2 Tivoli Storage Manager Architect CDP jabb...@partners.org Cell-617-633-8471 Desk-617-724-4929 Page-# (617) 362-6341 - 36364 6173391...@usamobility.net Be who you are and say what you feel because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Schaub, Steve Sent: Monday, November 28, 2011 9:00 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] multi-threaded Exchange backups In case anyone is interested, I modified our Powershell script for full backup of our Exchange databases so that it now backs up multiple concurrent Storage Groups in a single script (because I'm too darn lazy to deal with multiple node names, schedules, etc). In our case, it dropped elapsed times from 36hr to 11hr, running 4 concurrent threads. If anyone would like a copy, just contact me. Steve Schaub Systems Engineer II, Windows Backup/Recovery BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee steve_schaub at bcbst.com - Please see the following link for the BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee E-mail disclaimer: http://www.bcbst.com/email_disclaimer.shtm The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Re: Slow client backup
The only thing that has worked for us in these types of cases is to run a selective backup rather than an incremental. This way TSM just backs up every file rather than going through the examination process. This may or may not help you as I don't know the specifics of your systems. JoeA Joseph A Abbott MCSE 2003/2000, MCSA2003 Tivoli Storage Manager Architect jabb...@partners.org Cell-617-633-8471 Desk-617-724-4929 Page-# (617) 362-6341 6173391...@usamobility.net Be who you are and say what you feel because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Moyer, Joni M Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 2:50 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] Slow client backup Hi Everyone, I am looking for suggestions on how to improve the backup of an AIX TSM client: Node Name: CHRS141 Platform: AIX Client OS Level: 5.3 Client Version: Version 5, release 5, level 2.0 Policy Domain Name: AIX To a TSM AIX server at the 5.5.5.0 release. It appears that it is examining over 15 million files which to me is most likely the root cause of the backup taking so long. Is there anything that can be done to make this backup run faster/more efficiently? Please let me know. Any suggestions are greatly appreciated! Thanks! 12/14/10 14:33:37 ANE4952I (Session: 12522, Node: CHRS141) Total number of objects inspected: 15,779,764(SESSION: 12522) 12/14/10 14:33:37 ANE4954I (Session: 12522, Node: CHRS141) Total number of objects backed up: 365,295(SESSION: 12522) 12/14/10 14:33:37 ANE4958I (Session: 12522, Node: CHRS141) Total number of objects updated: 0(SESSION: 12522) 12/14/10 14:33:37 ANE4960I (Session: 12522, Node: CHRS141) Total number of objects rebound: 0(SESSION: 12522) 12/14/10 14:33:37 ANE4957I (Session: 12522, Node: CHRS141) Total number of objects deleted: 0(SESSION: 12522) 12/14/10 14:33:37 ANE4970I (Session: 12522, Node: CHRS141) Total number of objects expired: 68,914(SESSION: 12522) 12/14/10 14:33:37 ANE4959I (Session: 12522, Node: CHRS141) Total number of objects failed: 0(SESSION: 12522) 12/14/10 14:33:37 ANE4961I (Session: 12522, Node: CHRS141) Total number of bytes transferred: 24.77 GB(SESSION: 12522) 12/14/10 14:33:37 ANE4963I (Session: 12522, Node: CHRS141) Data transfer time:16,311.37 sec(SESSION: 12522) 12/14/10 14:33:37 ANE4966I (Session: 12522, Node: CHRS141) Network data transfer rate:1,592.35 KB/sec(SESSION: 12522) 12/14/10 14:33:37 ANE4967I (Session: 12522, Node: CHRS141) Aggregate data transfer rate:415.37 KB/sec(SESSION: 12522) 12/14/10 14:33:37 ANE4968I (Session: 12522, Node: CHRS141) Objects compressed by:0%(SESSION: 12522) 12/14/10 14:33:37 ANE4964I (Session: 12522, Node: CHRS141) Elapsed processing time:17:22:09(SESSION: 12522) This e-mail and any attachments to it are confidential and are intended solely for use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and then delete it. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not keep, use, disclose, copy or distribute this e-mail without the author's prior permission. The views expressed in this e-mail message do not necessarily represent the views of Highmark Inc., its subsidiaries, or affiliates. The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Re: PVU
Yep. The free ILMT. JoeA Joseph A Abbott MCSE 2003/2000, MCSA2003 Tivoli Storage Manager Architect jabb...@partners.org Cell-617-633-8471 Desk-617-724-4929 Page-# (617) 362-6341 6173391...@usamobility.net Be who you are and say what you feel because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Avy Wong Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 2:46 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] PVU Hello, It is too good to be true... but I am going to ask anyway. Is there a way to find out the pvu of each client node being backed up on tivoli without going to each individual box/server to look it up? Avy Wong Business Continuity Administrator Mohegan Sun 1 Mohegan Sun Blvd Uncasville, CT 06382 (860)862-8164 (cell) (860)961-6976 The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copy of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Re: PVU
ILMT can be configured without going out to each box. You just have to know how to script. We did 1800 clients in a day. JoeA Joseph A Abbott MCSE 2003/2000, MCSA2003 Tivoli Storage Manager Architect jabb...@partners.org Cell-617-633-8471 Desk-617-724-4929 Page-# (617) 362-6341 6173391...@usamobility.net Be who you are and say what you feel because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Lindsay Morris Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 3:34 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] PVU Well ... you have to install the free ILMT on each node. Right? So it costs no dollars - but a couple of weeks of time... Lindsay Morris CEO, TSMworks Tel. 1-859-539-9900 lind...@tsmworks.com On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Abbott, Joseph jabb...@partners.orgwrote: Yep. The free ILMT. JoeA Joseph A Abbott MCSE 2003/2000, MCSA2003 Tivoli Storage Manager Architect jabb...@partners.org Cell-617-633-8471 Desk-617-724-4929 Page-# (617) 362-6341 6173391...@usamobility.net Be who you are and say what you feel because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Avy Wong Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 2:46 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] PVU Hello, It is too good to be true... but I am going to ask anyway. Is there a way to find out the pvu of each client node being backed up on tivoli without going to each individual box/server to look it up? Avy Wong Business Continuity Administrator Mohegan Sun 1 Mohegan Sun Blvd Uncasville, CT 06382 (860)862-8164 (cell) (860)961-6976 The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copy of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Re: MS Exchange 2010
Currently there is no official TDP version available to the public. Contact your IBM rep and ask about the limited availability TDP. You will need to be running B/A client 6.1.3 for the TDP to work properly. JoeA From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager on behalf of Dave Frost Sent: Wed 1/13/2010 6:11 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] MS Exchange 2010 Hi, Is anyone backing up exchange 2010? If so, which tdp ver, and which tsm server ver are you using? regards dave The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Re: Per terabyte licensing
Once you go that route you'll also need to keep copies of the reports that agent will kick out for 2 years. The agent is also only for Windows and AIX clients as of today. Joseph A Abbott MCSE 2003/2000, MCSA2003 Tivoli Storage Manager Architect jabb...@partners.org Cell-617-633-8471 Desk-617-724-4929 Page-# (617) 362-6341 6173391...@usamobility.net Be who you are and say what you feel because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Richard Rhodes Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 11:42 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Per terabyte licensing We have sub-capacity licenses for TSM for some of our servers. We had to agree to install some kind of IBM licensing system. We haven't done it yet - but it's coming. It will require installing an agent on every server that has tsm clients. Rick John D. Schneider john.schnei...@c To OMPUTERCOACHINGCO ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU MMUNITY.COM cc Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Subject Manager Re: Per terabyte licensing ads...@vm.marist .EDU 09/29/2009 10:44 AM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ads...@vm.marist .EDU You are right, we eventually got an agreement for a sub-processor license for Oracle, but IBM didn't volunteer that. We insisted, and eventually won the concession after much negotiating. And I am sure part of the reason we got the concession is because of the size customer we are; a smaller customer has no leverage for expecting special pricing. Best Regards, John D. Schneider The Computer Coaching Community, LLC Office: (314) 635-5424 / Toll Free: (866) 796-9226 Cell: (314) 750-8721 Original Message Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Per terabyte licensing From: Mark Blunden m...@au1.ibm.com Date: Mon, September 28, 2009 7:04 pm To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU IBM does have a sub-capacity license process. You need to talk to your sales rep to find out the details. Basically, if you are only using 2 cpus for Oracle out of 128 total cpus available, then you only have to pay for 2 DB licenses. Obvioulsy other LPARs are probably servicing other data requirements which will need backing up, but you don't have to pay for the lot if you don't use the lot. regards, Mark Kelly Lipp l...@storserver. COM To Sent by: ADSM: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Dist Stor cc Manager ads...@vm.marist Subject .EDU Re: Per terabyte licensing 29/09/2009 09:48 AM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ads...@vm.marist .EDU And remember, too, that the PVU thing contemplated something like a DB2 license. Perhaps you had two or three systems that would run DB2. It did not contemplate something like TSM where EVERY system in the environment would have the software running. Keeping track of a couple of systems and their various processor/core/PVU stuff is relatively simple. Keeping track of that same thing across several hundred (never mind your case!) is very difficult. The one size fits all mentality of Tivoli software clearly missed the mark with TSM. Kelly Lipp Chief Technical Officer www.storserver.com 719-266-8777 x7105 STORServer solves your data backup challenges. Once and for all. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of John D. Schneider Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 4:47 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Per terabyte
Re: windows client 5.5.2.2 schedules using dsmcad and prompt do not start
What are the failure messages? Does the job just show as missed? Joseph A Abbott MCSE 2003/2000, MCSA2003 Partners Healthcare Systems Development Team Tivoli Storage Manager jabb...@partners.org Cell-617-633-8471 Desk-617-724-4929 Page-# (617) 362-6341 jabb...@usamobility.net Be who you are and say what you feel because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of TSM Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 1:17 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] windows client 5.5.2.2 schedules using dsmcad and prompt do not start Hello, windows client-schedules do not start. We use dsmcad and schedmode=prompt. There is no special error message. With client version 5.5.2.1 the schedules are working succesfull. I'm wondering, if there is a problem with the tsm client 5.5.2.2 ? Has anybody else the same problem? with best regards andreas The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Re: TDP for Exchnage 6.1 mailbox restore
What version of TDP and TSM server are you using? You should be able to do a mail box restore with the 5.5 TDP and TSM server 5.5 JoeA From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager on behalf of Nicholas Rodolfich Sent: Wed 6/3/2009 6:18 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] TDP for Exchnage 6.1 mailbox restore Hello All, Thanks for your help. I am implementing the TDP for Exchange. We have it installed and did a manual backup successfully. When we try to reetore a mailbox, it forces us to use a Recovery Storage Group in Exchange as the target. We chose a specific email in the filter section and were expecting a restre of what we were searching for. Instead, the restore seems to be building a whole new database, It wa sup to 14GB when we stopped it. It seem like nonsense to restore the whole storage group just to restore a single mail box. Is this required. Nicholas The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Re: Backup files to empty tape
If tape is your chosen media then you could do a backup set of the data. Backup sets are readable to anyone with a matching tape drive to your media and are not encrypted and don't require access to the original TSM DB. Joseph A Abbott MCSE 2003/2000, MCSA2003 Partners Healthcare Systems Development Team Tivoli Storage Manager jabb...@partners.org Cell-617-633-8471 Desk-617-724-4929 Page-# (617) 362-6341 jabb...@usamobility.net The pursuit of perfection is costly and adversley affects productivity. At some point you get what you get and work with that and you move on. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Kauffman, Tom Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 10:45 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Backup files to empty tape -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Mario Behring Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 4:15 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Backup files to empty tape That´s right...but, how can I assure that this data will be readable somewhere else, without TSM? Mario TSM is not a good choice for this. Your best bet is to burn the files to a CD or DVD, or us tar to build a tape OUTSIDE of TSM. And even then, if there is any binary data and the two systems are different platforms the results will be unpredictable (but usually not good). Tom CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance upon this message. If you have received this in error, please notify us immediately by return email and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message. The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Re: TSM v6 -announcement
Personal experience with a 80GB database was 33minutes when going from 5.5.1.6 to 6.1 Beta. JoeA Joseph A Abbott MCSE 2003/2000, MCSA2003 Partners Healthcare Systems Development Team Tivoli Storage Manager jabb...@partners.org Cell-617-633-8471 Desk-617-724-4929 Page-# (617) 362-6341 jabb...@usamobility.net I can't tell you how much I wish we could just shut up and smile. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Rainer Tammer Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 10:58 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM v6 -announcement Hello, Hart, Charles A wrote: Couple folks just came back from pulse and one of the Labs was the TSM Upgrade, apparently some Beta testers are seeing a 40GB upgrade DB taking 28Hrs on avg hdw is this is true than this would be a nightmare. Can anyone comment on that ?? Bye Rainer -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Andrew Raibeck Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 7:19 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM v6 -announcement Actually 6.1 has not been released yet; it has only been *announced*. Electronic availability date is March 27, 2009, and media availability date is April 24, 2009. Best regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Product Development Level 3 Team Lead Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/i...@ibmus Internet e-mail: stor...@us.ibm.com IBM Tivoli Storage Manager support web page: http://www.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support/IBMTivoliStorageMan ager.html The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. Good enough is the enemy of excellence. ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 02/12/2009 10:02:20 PM: [image removed] Re: TSM v6 -announcement Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU to: ADSM-L 02/12/2009 10:07 PM Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager Having been a V6.1 beta tester (now that it has been released I guess I can speak about it), I can confirm that as of the last update I have not seen anything for zOS other than s390 Linux. Also, they will not be supporting Linux NON-x64, which causes me issues since 2 of my RH Linux server are not x64 capable and will require replacing/upgrading/merging with another server. Gee, Norman norman@lc.ca.gov Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU 02/12/2009 07:23 PM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU To ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc Subject Re: [ADSM-L] TSM v6 -announcement I have read announcement letter 209-004 multiple times and was looking at the server documentation that was available and there were no mention of TSM version 6 for z/OS server. There were documentation for z/OS BA client and API. Is this a subtle hint that TSM version 6 for z/OS server is not available or is it being drop? Is it being delay? This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by replying to this message and delete this e-mail immediately. The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Re: 3584 web interface
Hello Steve. We also have a 3584 and are having the same issue. We had to call IBM hardware out to fix ours the last time this occurred. From what I understand there is no way to remotely address this issue and that the IP port needs to be turned off and then turned on again. I wish I could give you more information but that's al I can remember. JoeA From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager on behalf of Steven Harris Sent: Thu 10/23/2008 1:06 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] 3584 web interface Hi All I have a 3584 library that I was using the web interface to communicate with. The web interface has stopped responding although the library itslef continues to work. Is there a way to restart the web server from the front panel? Can it be done remotely? Thanks Steve. Steven Harris, TSM admin Sydney Australia The information transmitted in this electronic communication is intended only for the person or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this information in error, please contact the Compliance HelpLine at 800-856-1983 and properly dispose of this information.
Re: Library manager/library conundrum
I think that's your problem right there. The element and path have to match on all of your systems. The element/serial number and paths have to be the same for drive1 on all three systems. JoeA Joseph A Abbott MCSE/MCSD Partners Healthcare Systems Development Team Tivoli Storage Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cell-617-633-8471 Desk-617-724-4929 Page-# (617) 362-6341 [EMAIL PROTECTED] What fits your schedule better, exercising one hour a day or being dead 24 hours a day. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Zarnowski Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 12:33 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Library manager/library conundrum I'm guessing this is because the library put the tape in the wrong drive, or a different drive than the client-server is looking at. Check your element addresses in Q DRIVE and the device names in your paths on the library-manager-server. At 12:27 PM 10/2/2008, Mark Stapleton wrote: As I said, the client's request for a tape mount is honored by the manager, and it appears that the client gets an acknowledgement that the tape is mounted, because it tries to talk to the tape volume. That's when we get the ANR8779E Unable to open drive \\.\tape4, error number=123 error. -- Paul ZarnowskiPh: 607-255-4757 Manager, Storage Services Fx: 607-255-8521 719 Rhodes Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853-3801Em: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The information transmitted in this electronic communication is intended only for the person or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this information in error, please contact the Compliance HelpLine at 800-856-1983 and properly dispose of this information.
Re: Library manager/library conundrum
Correct and there shouldn't be any paths on the client systems. Only the library manager needs the paths. You need to setup paths from the library manager to itself and then to the other library clients. We are using this setup with 19 TSM instances accessing a TS3500 library and two library managers. JoeA Joseph A Abbott MCSE/MCSD Partners Healthcare Systems Development Team Tivoli Storage Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cell-617-633-8471 Desk-617-724-4929 Page-# (617) 362-6341 [EMAIL PROTECTED] What fits your schedule better, exercising one hour a day or being dead 24 hours a day. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Stapleton Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 12:33 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Library manager/library conundrum From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Zarnowski Double check your element numbers and paths to the drives. Make sure you have a path defined for each drive to each library-client server. There are no drive definitions for the remote library in the library client, and therefore no element numbers or paths to check. There is a path in the library manager that connects each of the tape drives to the library client, and as I mentioned there is obviously some communication going on. Here's another question that has been asked... When a library client sends migrated data from disk to a tape drive managed by a library manager, does the data flow on fiber from the client to the tape drive directly, or does it flow across the LAN from the client to the manager, and then on fiber from the manager to the tape drive? -- Mark Stapleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) CDW Berbee System engineer 7145 Boone Avenue North, Suite 140 Brooklyn Park MN 55428-1511 763-592-5963 www.berbee.com The information transmitted in this electronic communication is intended only for the person or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this information in error, please contact the Compliance HelpLine at 800-856-1983 and properly dispose of this information.
Re: Library manager/library conundrum
You hit it right on the head. The library manager has to be the higher of the software code levels. JoeA Joseph A Abbott MCSE/MCSD Partners Healthcare Systems Development Team Tivoli Storage Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cell-617-633-8471 Desk-617-724-4929 Page-# (617) 362-6341 [EMAIL PROTECTED] What fits your schedule better, exercising one hour a day or being dead 24 hours a day. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Stapleton Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 2:59 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Library manager/library conundrum Here's the deal... The physical device tape0, as seen by the library manager, has the devicename mt1.0.0.3. The same tape drive on the client, however, sees the tape drive as devicename mt3.0.0.5. (We can tell this by the tape drive serial numbers being reported.) We've deleted all but one library manager-defined path from the library client to the tape drive, and we've tried both mt definitions in the library manager's path statements--the one from the library manager and the one from the library client. In both cases, the manager changes ownership of the library volume, mounts the volume in the drive, and then the client waits and waits, and finally times out with the ANR8779E error message. We're stumped. The only thing that I can think is that the library client is at 5.4.2 and the library server is at 5.4.1. -- Mark Stapleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) CDW Berbee System engineer 7145 Boone Avenue North, Suite 140 Brooklyn Park MN 55428-1511 763-592-5963 www.berbee.com -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fred Johanson Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 12:22 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Library manager/library conundrum If you're SAN connected, Q SAN on the client supplies the device name for each path. Fred Johanson TSM Administrator University of Chicago 773-702-8464 -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Remco Post Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 12:04 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Library manager/library conundrum On Oct 2, 2008, at 18:33 , Mark Stapleton wrote: From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Zarnowski Double check your element numbers and paths to the drives. Make sure you have a path defined for each drive to each library-client server. There are no drive definitions for the remote library in the library client, and therefore no element numbers or paths to check. There is a path in the library manager that connects each of the tape drives to the library client, and as I mentioned there is obviously some communication going on. Here's another question that has been asked... When a library client sends migrated data from disk to a tape drive managed by a library manager, does the data flow on fiber from the client to the tape drive directly, or does it flow across the LAN from the client to the manager, and then on fiber from the manager to the tape drive? This may be a clue, the drive is accessed directly by the library client. All the library server does is verify the label. After that, the device is opened by the client. This is the reason the paths (defined on the library server) must be correct for the library client. So if a drive called drive4 is \\.\tape4 on the server and \\. \tape1 on the client, there must be a path, defined on the server, from your client to drive4 via device \\.\tape1 -- Mark Stapleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) CDW Berbee System engineer 7145 Boone Avenue North, Suite 140 Brooklyn Park MN 55428-1511 763-592-5963 www.berbee.com -- Met vriendelijke groeten, Remco Post [EMAIL PROTECTED] The information transmitted in this electronic communication is intended only for the person or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this information in error, please contact the Compliance HelpLine at 800-856-1983 and properly dispose of this information.