Re: Client/Server questions on Exchange 2007 TDP
I haven't rolled to v5.5.0 - yet... I have TSM v5.3.5 Server and on the Exchange 2007 x64 - TSM v5.4.1.3 and TDP v.5.4.1.0. But, it does Legacy-Backups only... We don't have the necessary components for the VSS-backups. You have to get the TDP v.5.4.1.0 from the Passport website... FYI, Troy Barnhart, Sr. Systems Programmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Regional Health, Inc. 353 Fairmont Boulevard Rapid City, South Dakota 57701 PH: 605-716-8352 / FAX: 605-716-8302 -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel Lane Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 12:09 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] Client/Server questions on Exchange 2007 TDP Hello Everyone, I want to upgrade our TSM server so that we can use TDP; the version compatible with Exchange 2007 x64 but it seems there is only a version 5.5.0. Do I have to upgrade to TSM server 5.5.0 to get Exchange 2007 TDP? Currently we are running 5.3.3 TDP for our Exchange Server 2003 and 5.3.6 for the TSM server. ftp://service.boulder.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management/maintenance/tivoli-data-protection/ntexch/ Thank You, Dan Lane ***Note: The information contained in this message, including any attachments, may be privileged, confidential, and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the Sender immediately by a reply to sender only message and destroy all electronic or paper copies of the communication, including any attachments.
Re: Client/Server questions on Exchange 2007 TDP
Sorry for the miscommunication... v.5.4.1 does support VSS-backups. I meant that my facility doesn't have the necessary components. Troy -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel Lane Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 1:15 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Client/Server questions on Exchange 2007 TDP Am I the only one who has difficulty finding the software you need on the Passport site? I can find version 5.5.0 and 5.3.3 among several older ones... http://www.ibm.com/products/finder/us/finders?lc=enC2=5000787C1=5000674tmpl=%2Fproducts%2Ffinder%2Fus%2Fen%2Ffindersibm-go.y=9ibm-go.x=20sid=881498821195500692825cc=usN=914+5000787+1000100+350oldC1=5000674collectionN=0cm_re=other-_-suprcn-_-downloadfinderN=1000100pg=ddfinder; Does anyone have a clue for me on where to find this client? So the newer 5.4.1 client works with the older server without issues? Does tsm server work with any client version or is there specific versions required to function correctly? VSS-backups will be able to be done via the new 5.5.0 version though; correct? |Dan -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Barnhart, Troy Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 2:15 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Client/Server questions on Exchange 2007 TDP I haven't rolled to v5.5.0 - yet... I have TSM v5.3.5 Server and on the Exchange 2007 x64 - TSM v5.4.1.3 and TDP v.5.4.1.0. But, it does Legacy-Backups only... We don't have the necessary components for the VSS-backups. You have to get the TDP v.5.4.1.0 from the Passport website... FYI, Troy Barnhart, Sr. Systems Programmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Regional Health, Inc. 353 Fairmont Boulevard Rapid City, South Dakota 57701 PH: 605-716-8352 / FAX: 605-716-8302 -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel Lane Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 12:09 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] Client/Server questions on Exchange 2007 TDP Hello Everyone, I want to upgrade our TSM server so that we can use TDP; the version compatible with Exchange 2007 x64 but it seems there is only a version 5.5.0. Do I have to upgrade to TSM server 5.5.0 to get Exchange 2007 TDP? Currently we are running 5.3.3 TDP for our Exchange Server 2003 and 5.3.6 for the TSM server. ftp://service.boulder.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management/maintenance/tivoli-data-protection/ntexch/ Thank You, Dan Lane ***Note: The information contained in this message, including any attachments, may be privileged, confidential, and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the Sender immediately by a reply to sender only message and destroy all electronic or paper copies of the communication, including any attachments.
Re: Scheduling a full archive of data once/month
84 Monthly Archives - be careful on how that will make your TSM-database grow... (Depending on how many nodes and how many objects backed up per node...) Our TSM database grew from 30GB to over 300GB in under two years and nearly cratered the Win2k server. We moved to 3 TSM servers (same versions as you have) - 2 beefy AIX servers for daily backups and 1 AIX server strictly for the monthly archive. The archive server backs up less than a dozen nodes (with detailed incl/excl) for the past 5 years we currently have about a TSM-database of around 150GB... Just a heads-up... Regards, Troy Barnhart, Sr. Systems Programmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Regional Health, Inc. 353 Fairmont Boulevard Rapid City, South Dakota 57701 PH: 605-716-8352 / FAX: 605-716-8302 -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joni Moyer Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 9:47 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Scheduling a full archive of data once/month Hello Larry, I was just wondering where you found this syntax? From the command line when I did a help define schedule it didn't give me all of these features. I just thought I would ask before I try this out. Thanks again! Joni Moyer Highmark Storage Systems, Storage Mngt Analyst III Phone Number: (717)302-9966 Fax: (717) 302-9826 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Larry Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU 10/22/2007 11:28 AM To ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc Subject Re: Scheduling a full archive of data once/month Something like: 1). def sched domain monthlyarch act=archive scheds=enhanced week=first day=saturday options='-subdir=yes -domain=all-local' expiration=10/30/2014 2). associate your clients with the schedule - Original Message - From: Joni Moyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 10:49 AM Subject: [ADSM-L] Scheduling a full archive of data once/month Hello everyone, I have just received the task of scheduling an archive of all data from several windows servers the first Saturday of every month for 7 years. What is the best method of accomplishing this? I would like to do this from the TSM server which is an AIX 5.3 TSM 5.3.5.2 server. Any suggestions are greatly appreciated! Joni Moyer Highmark Storage Systems, Storage Mngt Analyst III Phone Number: (717)302-9966 Fax: (717) 302-9826 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***Note: The information contained in this message, including any attachments, may be privileged, confidential, and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the Sender immediately by a reply to sender only message and destroy all electronic or paper copies of the communication, including any attachments.
Re: AW: [ADSM-L] RAC backups
We are building our first RAC. Due to the requirements of the vendor's product, we are building a 3-way RAC cluster (on Win2k3-64bit). We usually use BMC's SQLBacktrack for all of our databases, but BMC has released a client supporting RAC on Windows, yet. Right now we are using RMAN to output a flat-file and having TSM BAclient pick that up. I'd like to try TDP to a separate TSM node for the database filespace. I'd appreciate any advice, also... TIA, Troy Troy Barnhart, Sr. Systems Programmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Regional Health, Inc. 353 Fairmont Boulevard Rapid City, South Dakota 57701 PH: 605-716-8352 / FAX: 605-716-8302 -Original Message- From: Thomas Rupp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 3:35 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] AW: [ADSM-L] RAC backups We backup a 4-node Linux RAC 10G-R2 without any problems. TSM BA client and API as well as TDP for Oracle was installed on every node. Backups are triggered by RMAN and work fine. I would be glad to answer any further questions you have. Thomas Rupp On Monday 23 April 2007 16:18, Thomas, Matthew wrote: Guys, Does anyone have any guidance on using TSM scheduled TDP backups with Oracle RAC multi-node grids? We're due to implement a 4-way RAC cluster (on AIX) and ultimately we'll need the database(s) to be backed up and restored via any of the 4 nodes in the grid. Any advice would be appreciated. TIA Matt Thomas ***Note: The information contained in this message, including any attachments, may be privileged, confidential, and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the Sender immediately by a reply to sender only message and destroy all electronic or paper copies of the communication, including any attachments.
Re: Follow-up on: Problems with Imation ultrium-2 (LTO-2) tapes?
When we first install our first 3584 three years ago, we bought around 200 Imation LTO2 tapes. They lasted about a month and we also RMA'd them all... We've been on Maxell's for the last three years with maybe 10 tapes, at the most, that have been bad from hundreds of tapes. (And we're not sure it was the tape that was bad, but maybe a bad drive causing it to fail.) We have a volume of about 1.2TB/day. We've heard several similar stories as ours. But, another local company uses Imation in their 3584 (although 3494, not LTO2) with no problems. Troy Barnhart, Sr. Systems Programmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Regional Health, Inc. 353 Fairmont Boulevard Rapid City, South Dakota 57701 PH: 605-716-8352 / FAX: 605-716-8302 -Original Message- From: Kauffman, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 7:04 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ADSM-L] Follow-up on: Problems with Imation ultrium-2 (LTO-2) tapes? Just for what it's worth - an observation. I run about 2.4 TB of data through my 3584 on a daily process, between archives, backups, and off-site copies. I've had the same 4 cleaning tapes in place since my first 3584, with LTO-1 drives, just over 5 years now - and one tape has had a count of 11 uses. All from early days, using the tape to verify drives after maintenance. The count is now at 35; I've done 24 cleaning cycles this week on 16 drives. I have an RMA number. Tom - Is there any particular firmware I should be running in my IBM drives to work with Imation tapes? We've been running Fuji and IBM with no issues for years, but we put a group of new Imation tapes in Friday - and I've had write errors on 4 of them so far, and a read error on one that caused the drive to go not-ready to the point it won't soft-reset. I am back-level on drive firmware (I don't usually fix anything that's working) so I thought I'd check that before I get an RMA from the vendor for the tapes. TIA Tom Kauffman NIBCO Inc. ***Note: The information contained in this message, including any attachments, may be privileged, confidential, and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the Sender immediately by a reply to sender only message and destroy all electronic or paper copies of the communication, including any attachments.
Re: New personal best.
We're curious here in our shop... We are building a couple of servers for a new project that may do this also. How fast did this 1 TB backup? Is this with an AIX-TSM server? Diskpool Hardware? Tapepool Hardware? Thanks, Troy Barnhart, Sr. Systems Programmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Regional Health, Inc. 353 Fairmont Boulevard Rapid City, South Dakota 57701 -Original Message- From: Allen S. Rout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2007 5:04 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] New personal best. This is the first time I've seen one of these in the wild. tsm: EXT2q sess Sess Comm. Sess Wait Bytes Bytes Sess Platform Client Name Number Method StateTimeSent Recvd Type -- -- -- -- --- --- - 9,513 Tcp/Ip Run 0 S 212.6 K 1.0 T Node Linux86 CISE-RESEARCH53 - Allen S. Rout ***Note: The information contained in this message, including any attachments, may be privileged, confidential, and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the Sender immediately by a reply to sender only message and destroy all electronic or paper copies of the communication, including any attachments.
Re: IBM Tivoli Technical User Conference
Talk to your IBM sales rep. maybe they can get you to an Executive Briefing Center. Those are usually awesome... I've gotten numerous requests and suggestions solved at those... Troy Barnhart, Sr. Systems Programmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Regional Health, Inc. 353 Fairmont Boulevard Rapid City, South Dakota 57701 PH: 605-716-8352 / FAX: 605-716-8302 -Original Message- From: Bell, Charles (Chip) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 11:38 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] IBM Tivoli Technical User Conference From looking at the Tivoli conference agendas in the past, TSM plays a fractional part in the sessions provided. USERBlue (sometimes in conjunction with SHARE) seems to provide more for TSMers. I went to the one in NYC a couple years back, and it was great. Also, look for nearby Tivoli User Group Meetings and check their agenda. Just went to the one in Atlanta last week, and it was very informative. My rule of thumb is to keep current on events, and scour the sessions/agendas to see if it's worth the drive/plane ticket. A Tivoli conference not special to TSM is saturated with everything Tivoli, including pumping up the recently acquired products that are now under the Tivoli umbrella (i.e. NetCool, etc.) -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David E Ehresman Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 12:29 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] IBM Tivoli Technical User Conference How much of the Tivoli conference is TSM and how much is other Tivoli products? David Bell, Charles (Chip) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2/21/2007 1:08 PM 45-55, in the order you listed it. 45, useful...55, PR. It's worth it to attend these events. Hey if nothing else, get out of the office for a moment. :) -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Hatfield Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 11:31 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] IBM Tivoli Technical User Conference Hello Everyone, I got email to attend the IBM Tivoli Technical User Conference. Is this a really beneficial event for a busy Tivoli Admin who is interested in learning more about the Tivoli environment? Or is it more of a PR thing for Tivoli and IBM? I confess, from the website it appears more the latter... What do you guys think? Thank You, Jim Hatfield Kings Daughters Medical Center [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this e-mail and destroy any copies. Any dissemination or use of this information by a person other than the intended recipient is unauthorized and may be illegal. - Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information and intended only for the use of the individual or entity named in the address. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you received this information in error, please notify the sender and delete this information from your computer and retain no copies of any of this information. ***Note: The information contained in this message, including any attachments, may be privileged, confidential, and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the Sender immediately by a reply to sender only message and destroy all electronic or paper copies of the communication, including any attachments.
Re: RoadMap? (Offtopic: Executive Briefings)
Just to add a related, but off-topic, suggestion about TSM 5.4 and IBM... Last fall we (as technicians) were invited to an Executive Briefing at IBM-Tucson about our storage needs. We received a roadmap presentation on TSM 5.4 and other storage concepts. I've been to a couple of IBM's Executive Briefings now. And I want to really advise you all that if you ever get the chance for one of these: Take it... Troy Barnhart, Sr. Systems Programmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Regional Health, Inc. 353 Fairmont Boulevard Rapid City, South Dakota 57701 PH: 605-716-8352 / FAX: 605-716-8302 -Original Message- From: Leigh Reed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 3:53 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] RoadMap? I think that TSM 5.4 was due for release this month, however I don't know if it is on schedule. I think the reindeer struggled this year and Santa was late getting to the developers. (Sorry, couldn't resist a belated festive funny) A list of the new features/enhancements that were scheduled to be included follows below. Again, some might not have made the cut. I would imagine that some of the IBM'ers will give you a more detailed corporate line a little later in the day. Possible features; The ability to collocate active data on sequential media (typically sequential access disk for fast restores and reduced size disk pools). Integration of NDMP (Netapps/n-series) backups with TSM storage pools (allows filer-to-TSM-server backups). Support for NDMP v4. Backupset enhancements and improved flexibility (ability to produce point-intime backupsets using data in storage pools at any time). New Incremental backup method using a local disk cache to minimise memory utilisation (can now process an unbounded number of files). Vista Support (and Volume Shadow Copy Service integration). Support for Intel based Mac OS X (and standardised to use normal option file names). Support for hardware tape drive encryption. Various Admin Center updates. Note: Windows 2000 is not supported on ITSM 5.4. ***Note: The information contained in this message, including any attachments, may be privileged, confidential, and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the Sender immediately by a reply to sender only message and destroy all electronic or paper copies of the communication, including any attachments.
Re: RoadMap? (Offtopic: Executive Briefings)
Sorry, no. It was more of an off-the-cuff discussion with representatives from the development team. We were technicians there to learn, not the usual company executives or using it as a complaint session. So we asked to dig in with tivoli technicians on our needs. It was great. We've been able to really fix some past problems, suggest some ideas to the team, and get a better idea of where we want to go with IBM-Tivoli hardware/software. Troy Barnhart, Sr. Systems Programmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Regional Health, Inc. 353 Fairmont Boulevard Rapid City, South Dakota 57701 PH: 605-716-8352 / FAX: 605-716-8302 -Original Message- From: Timothy Hughes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 8:29 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] RoadMap? (Offtopic: Executive Briefings) Hi Troy, Can this presentation be viewed on-line? Thanks Barnhart, Troy wrote: Just to add a related, but off-topic, suggestion about TSM 5.4 and IBM... Last fall we (as technicians) were invited to an Executive Briefing at IBM-Tucson about our storage needs. We received a roadmap presentation on TSM 5.4 and other storage concepts. I've been to a couple of IBM's Executive Briefings now. And I want to really advise you all that if you ever get the chance for one of these: Take it... Troy Barnhart, Sr. Systems Programmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Regional Health, Inc. 353 Fairmont Boulevard Rapid City, South Dakota 57701 PH: 605-716-8352 / FAX: 605-716-8302 -Original Message- From: Leigh Reed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 3:53 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] RoadMap? I think that TSM 5.4 was due for release this month, however I don't know if it is on schedule. I think the reindeer struggled this year and Santa was late getting to the developers. (Sorry, couldn't resist a belated festive funny) A list of the new features/enhancements that were scheduled to be included follows below. Again, some might not have made the cut. I would imagine that some of the IBM'ers will give you a more detailed corporate line a little later in the day. Possible features; The ability to collocate active data on sequential media (typically sequential access disk for fast restores and reduced size disk pools). Integration of NDMP (Netapps/n-series) backups with TSM storage pools (allows filer-to-TSM-server backups). Support for NDMP v4. Backupset enhancements and improved flexibility (ability to produce point-intime backupsets using data in storage pools at any time). New Incremental backup method using a local disk cache to minimise memory utilisation (can now process an unbounded number of files). Vista Support (and Volume Shadow Copy Service integration). Support for Intel based Mac OS X (and standardised to use normal option file names). Support for hardware tape drive encryption. Various Admin Center updates. Note: Windows 2000 is not supported on ITSM 5.4. ***Note: The information contained in this message, including any attachments, may be privileged, confidential, and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the Sender immediately by a reply to sender only message and destroy all electronic or paper copies of the communication, including any attachments. ***Note: The information contained in this message, including any attachments, may be privileged, confidential, and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the Sender immediately by a reply to sender only message and destroy all electronic or paper copies of the communication, including any attachments.
Re: OT? TSM in a hospital environment
Been there done (and still doing) that... We have TSM and related products for our facilities. (We have standardized our database backups on BMC's SqlBackTrack.) We weigh the need of the app and usually strong-arm them back... If a vendor says that we can't touch their data, we DON'T touch their data. We put them on the hook for recovery. I think most healthcare-vendors are use to hospitals that simply write a check to the vendor for services. We are very hands-on with our own data... Usually, a vendor's South Dakota support resources are not too spectacular, and after a disaster or two, they come around to our way of thinking. Plus, Hospitals seem to have a bit different IT enviroment as shops in other industries. We have literally hundreds of applications from different vendors. We have different servers, facilities, operating systems, VENDOR's REQUIREMENTS, etc... Anything specific giving you problems? Regards, Troy Troy Barnhart, Sr. Systems Programmer, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rapid City Regional Hospital, Rapid City, South Dakota, 57701 ph: 605-719-8068 / fax: 605-719-4206 -Original Message- From: Tyree, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 11:29 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] OT? TSM in a hospital environment Are there any folks on the list that are using TSM in a hospital? Sometimes we have to battle with some of our software venders to allow us to backup their system using TSM. Sometimes they will tell us that the system is FDA approved as is and must be backed up using a built-in tape drive and we can't touch the system. Some times that might be believable but not always. It seems that GE appears to be especially hard headed in this regard. We bought into TSM because you back up anything (well most anything) and not have to worry about having assorted different tape drives scattered everywhere. I would like to compare notes with other TSM people if possible. thanks David Tyree Enterprise Backup Administrator South Georgia Medical Center 229.333.1155 text pager [EMAIL PROTECTED] Confidential Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
Re: Red Hat Enterprise V3
ftp://service.boulder.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management/maintenance/client/v5r3/Linux/ -Original Message- From: Gill, Geoffrey L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 3:10 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] Red Hat Enterprise V3 Does anyone know if there is tsm client software for Red Hat Enterprise V3 available for download? Thanks, Geoff Gill TSM Administrator SAIC M/S-G1b (858)826-4062 Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***Note: The information contained in this message, including any attachments, may be privileged, confidential, and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the Sender immediately by a reply to sender only message and destroy all electronic or paper copies of the communication, including any attachments.
Re: CBMR FOR LINUX
I have beta-tested and have 9 RedHat 2.1 boxes in production with it... Troy Barnhart, Sr. Systems Programmer, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rapid City Regional Hospital, Rapid City, South Dakota, 57701 ph: 605-719-8068 / fax: 605-719-4206 -Original Message- From: Sandeep Jain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 5:06 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] CBMR FOR LINUX Hi, has anyone tried with CBMR On Linux platform I am facing strange problem while restoring... With Best Regards, Sandeep Jain ***Note: The information contained in this message, including any attachments, may be privileged, confidential, and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the Sender immediately by a reply to sender only message and destroy all electronic or paper copies of the communication, including any attachments.
Re: TSM Bmr ??
I'm a big fan of the Cristie's BMR for Windows and RedHat Linux. They are pretty slick. I can restore a box from scratch in under 10 minutes. My only caveat for dislike hardware restores is using newer hardware. i.e. their driver support for older hardware. We had problems getting older drivers to work correctly - such as old HP LH3 Netservers. But, with our newer IBM xSeries - very smooth... Regards, Troy Troy Barnhart, Sr. Systems Programmer, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rapid City Regional Hospital, Rapid City, South Dakota, 57701 ph: 605-719-8068 / fax: 605-719-4206 - Original Message - From: Prather, Wanda [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Sent: Monday, November 28, 2005 4:02 PM Subject: Re: TSM Bmr ?? What I meant was, to a different TYPE machine, i.e., disklike hardware, not just a different machine. The Christie Bare Metal add-on product supports restoring Windows to unlike hardware. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Brown Sent: Monday, November 28, 2005 4:04 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: TSM Bmr ?? you said that windows does not support restoring a registry to a different machine, but isnt that what happens when i follow the instructions in the Disaster Recovery Strategies with TSM pdf. is tsm ever going to support restoring to dislike hardware ? tim - Original Message - From: Prather, Wanda [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Sent: Monday, November 28, 2005 3:40 PM Subject: Re: TSM Bmr ?? http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;249694 -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Brown Sent: Monday, November 28, 2005 3:37 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: TSM Bmr ?? is there documentation that describes the differences between the same machine after a hard drive failure and restoring to different hardware at a hot site i am attempting the later tim - Original Message - From: Prather, Wanda [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Sent: Monday, November 28, 2005 3:26 PM Subject: Re: TSM Bmr ?? IT's not a TSM issue, it's a Windows issue. Microsoft does not support restoring a registry to a different machine. That being said, they used to have a procedure in the knowledge base that you can try. Check there. How you test BMR, depends on what you are trying to do. You need different procedures for different possible disasters; Procedures needed to restore back to the same machine after a hard drive failure, are simpler than the case where you are restoring to different hardware at a hot site. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Brown Sent: Monday, November 28, 2005 3:25 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: TSM Bmr ?? Is there still a requirement to restore a TSM client to the same server hardware type. Can the restored server be somewhat different. How does everyone else test the TSM BMR procedures. Tm Brown Systems Specialist Central Hudson Gas Electric 284 South Ave Poughkeepsie, NY 12601 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: 845-486-5643 Fax: 845-486-5921 . ***Note: The information contained in this message, including any attachments, may be privileged, confidential, and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the Sender immediately by a reply to sender only message and destroy all electronic or paper copies of the communication, including any attachments.
Re: TSM Bmr ??
http://www.cristie.co.uk $995 per server - Retail. (You can get it a cheaper...) I also agree on the merits of the TSM+ASR Redbook... We've had success with both methods. Troy -Original Message- From: Tim Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 28, 2005 2:53 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM Bmr ?? do you have the link for cristies bmr, and how much is it tim - Original Message - From: Barnhart, Troy [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Sent: Monday, November 28, 2005 4:17 PM Subject: Re: TSM Bmr ?? I'm a big fan of the Cristie's BMR for Windows and RedHat Linux. They are pretty slick. I can restore a box from scratch in under 10 minutes. My only caveat for dislike hardware restores is using newer hardware. i.e. their driver support for older hardware. We had problems getting older drivers to work correctly - such as old HP LH3 Netservers. But, with our newer IBM xSeries - very smooth... Regards, Troy Troy Barnhart, Sr. Systems Programmer, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rapid City Regional Hospital, Rapid City, South Dakota, 57701 ph: 605-719-8068 / fax: 605-719-4206 - Original Message - From: Prather, Wanda [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Sent: Monday, November 28, 2005 4:02 PM Subject: Re: TSM Bmr ?? What I meant was, to a different TYPE machine, i.e., disklike hardware, not just a different machine. The Christie Bare Metal add-on product supports restoring Windows to unlike hardware. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Brown Sent: Monday, November 28, 2005 4:04 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: TSM Bmr ?? you said that windows does not support restoring a registry to a different machine, but isnt that what happens when i follow the instructions in the Disaster Recovery Strategies with TSM pdf. is tsm ever going to support restoring to dislike hardware ? tim - Original Message - From: Prather, Wanda [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Sent: Monday, November 28, 2005 3:40 PM Subject: Re: TSM Bmr ?? http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;249694 -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Brown Sent: Monday, November 28, 2005 3:37 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: TSM Bmr ?? is there documentation that describes the differences between the same machine after a hard drive failure and restoring to different hardware at a hot site i am attempting the later tim - Original Message - From: Prather, Wanda [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Sent: Monday, November 28, 2005 3:26 PM Subject: Re: TSM Bmr ?? IT's not a TSM issue, it's a Windows issue. Microsoft does not support restoring a registry to a different machine. That being said, they used to have a procedure in the knowledge base that you can try. Check there. How you test BMR, depends on what you are trying to do. You need different procedures for different possible disasters; Procedures needed to restore back to the same machine after a hard drive failure, are simpler than the case where you are restoring to different hardware at a hot site. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Brown Sent: Monday, November 28, 2005 3:25 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: TSM Bmr ?? Is there still a requirement to restore a TSM client to the same server hardware type. Can the restored server be somewhat different. How does everyone else test the TSM BMR procedures. Tm Brown Systems Specialist Central Hudson Gas Electric 284 South Ave Poughkeepsie, NY 12601 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: 845-486-5643 Fax: 845-486-5921 . ***Note: The information contained in this message, including any attachments, may be privileged, confidential, and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the Sender immediately by a reply to sender only message and destroy all electronic or paper copies of the communication, including any attachments. ***Note: The information contained in this message, including any attachments, may be privileged, confidential, and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the Sender immediately by a reply to sender only message and destroy all electronic or paper copies
Re: VTS or san disk storage
If it is the rumored OEM-version of FalconStor's VTL product, then it may not be bad. I've worked with that product and it appeared pretty decent. my 2 coppers... Troy Barnhart, Sr. Systems Programmer, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rapid City Regional Hospital, Rapid City, South Dakota, 57701 ph: 605-719-8068 / fax: 605-719-4206 -Original Message- From: Mark Stapleton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 11:32 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] VTS or san disk storage IBM has a new virtual tape library; it's either out now or will be very soon. The verdict on *that* is still out. -- (note my new address) [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***Note: The information contained in this message, including any attachments, may be privileged, confidential, and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the Sender immediately by a reply to sender only message and destroy all electronic or paper copies of the communication, including any attachments.
