Re: LTO1 tapes in LTO2 drives

2004-06-10 Thread Cynthia Leon
I am also getting ready to add 2 LTO2 drives to a library that has 10 LTO1
drives.  I have been told by IBM that I must partition my 3584 and define 2
libraries.  Is this true?

Thanks,
Cynthia

-Original Message-
From: Warren, Matthew (Retail) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 7:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: LTO1 tapes in LTO2 drives


Hallo TSM'ers

I understand that LTO2 drives can read and write LTO1 tapes.

We have 12 LTO1 and 12 LTO2 drives in a library.

2 device classes, ultrium1 and ultrium2, each with a mount limit of 12.

During the course of the day, all LTO1 drives could be utilised while
LTO2 drives are empty and available for use.

Is it possible to instruct TSM to utilise the free LTO2 drives should
more requests for LTO1 mounts occur than there are LTO1 drives
available?

I have been thinking of setting the ultrium2 devclass to a format of
ultrium,ultriumc,ultrium2,ultrium2c and ultrium1 to a mountlimit of
drives and wondering if that would let TSM mount LTO1's in LTO2 drives
if needed, but I am having no joy in getting the devclasses configured
this way.

Thanks,

Matt.



___ Disclaimer Notice __
This message and any attachments are confidential and should only be read by
those to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient,
please contact us, delete the message from your computer and destroy any
copies. Any distribution or copying without our prior permission is
prohibited.

Internet communications are not always secure and therefore the Powergen
Group does not accept legal responsibility for this message. The recipient
is responsible for verifying its authenticity before acting on the contents.
Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily represent those of the Powergen Group.

Registered addresses:

Powergen UK plc, Westwood Way, Westwood Business Park,
Coventry CV4 8LG.
Registered in England & Wales No. 2366970

Powergen Retail Limited,  Westwood Way, Westwood Business Park,
Coventry CV4 8LG.
Registered in England and Wales No: 3407430

Telephone +44 (0) 2476 42 4000
Fax+44 (0) 2476 42 5432

==
--- PRESBYTERIAN HEALTHCARE SERVICES DISCLAIMER ---

This message originates from Presbyterian Healthcare Services or one of its
affiliated organizations. It contains information, which may be confidential
or privileged, and is intended only for the individual or entity named above.
It is prohibited for anyone else to disclose, copy, distribute or use the
contents of this message. All personal messages express views solely of the
sender, which are not to be attributed to Presbyterian Healthcare Services or
any of its affiliated organizations, and may not be distributed without this
disclaimer. If you received this message in error, please notify us
immediately at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
==


Re: Access to archived files from a different node

2004-02-04 Thread Cynthia Leon
Try using the -virtualnode option.

Cynthia

-Original Message-
From: Dan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 10:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Access to archived files from a different node


We want to be able to retrieve archived files to a different system for
cases in which the original system is no longer available (crash, DR,
etc.).  I tested doing a retrieve from a different system using the
-fromnode option, but it worked only after I did a 'set access' for the
new node from the original system.  In a real situation, I wouldn't be
able to go back to the original system to do a 'set access'.  Is there
any way to handle this scenario other than doing a preemptive 'set
access' from all systems allowing retrieves anywhere?

Thanks,

Dan Sidorick

==
--- PRESBYTERIAN HEALTHCARE SERVICES DISCLAIMER ---

This message originates from Presbyterian Healthcare Services or one of its
affiliated organizations. It contains information, which may be confidential
or privileged, and is intended only for the individual or entity named above.
It is prohibited for anyone else to disclose, copy, distribute or use the
contents of this message. All personal messages express views solely of the
sender, which are not to be attributed to Presbyterian Healthcare Services or
any of its affiliated organizations, and may not be distributed without this
disclaimer. If you received this message in error, please notify us
immediately at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
==


TSM etherchannel adapter

2004-01-13 Thread Cynthia Leon
We are running TSM 5.1.7 on a AIX 5.1 box.  We are converting are network
adapter to an etherchannel.   Has anyone done this with success?  Do you
have any suggestions or known issues?

Thanks,
Cynthia Leon


Re: Novell 4.11 clients

2004-01-09 Thread Cynthia Leon
Thanks for responding Flemming.  I just wanted to make sure that this TSM
client could run with a TSM 5.2 server.  Have you had any problems?

Cynthia

-Original Message-
From: Hougaard.Flemming FHG [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 1:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SV: Novell 4.11 clients


Hi Cynthia

I have been... whats your question?

Flemming

-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Cynthia Leon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 7. januar 2004 16:06
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Novell 4.11 clients


Is anyone running the TSM 4.2.1.29 client on Novell 4.11 servers and using a
TSM V5.2 server?

Thanks,
Cynthia Leon



==
--- PRESBYTERIAN HEALTHCARE SERVICES DISCLAIMER ---

This message originates from Presbyterian Healthcare Services or one of its
affiliated organizations. It contains information, which may be confidential
or privileged, and is intended only for the individual or entity named
above.
It is prohibited for anyone else to disclose, copy, distribute or use the
contents of this message. All personal messages express views solely of the
sender, which are not to be attributed to Presbyterian Healthcare Services
or
any of its affiliated organizations, and may not be distributed without this
disclaimer. If you received this message in error, please notify us
immediately at [EMAIL PROTECTED]

==


Novell 4.11 clients

2004-01-07 Thread Cynthia Leon
Is anyone running the TSM 4.2.1.29 client on Novell 4.11 servers and using a
TSM V5.2 server?

Thanks,
Cynthia Leon


==
--- PRESBYTERIAN HEALTHCARE SERVICES DISCLAIMER ---

This message originates from Presbyterian Healthcare Services or one of its
affiliated organizations. It contains information, which may be confidential
or privileged, and is intended only for the individual or entity named above.
It is prohibited for anyone else to disclose, copy, distribute or use the
contents of this message. All personal messages express views solely of the
sender, which are not to be attributed to Presbyterian Healthcare Services or
any of its affiliated organizations, and may not be distributed without this
disclaimer. If you received this message in error, please notify us
immediately at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
==


Re: PLs help

2003-11-20 Thread Cynthia Leon
Increase MAXNUMMP to 999 for the node.

-Original Message-
From: Hart, Charles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 12:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PLs help


That too

-Original Message-
From: Damron, Nancy E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 1:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PLs help


Sounds like you dont have enough tape devices to satify your request

-Original Message-
From: Geetha Thanu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 11:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PLs help


Hi all,

I lost all my users data in the RAID box and I am dependent on TIVOLI
backup.
But when i try to restore it creates the directories and just
say backup complete and the error reported is
"Data unavailable on server" and when i see the error
log it says

ANR0567W - insufficient mount points available to satisfy the requsst

very urgent. pls help

Thyanks


Geetha Thanu
Bioinformatics
CDFD,Hyderabad.









-



Important Warning: This message is intended for the use of the person or
entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is
privileged and confidential, the disclosure of which is governed by
applicable law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this information is STRICTLY PROHIBITED.

If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by
calling (310) 423-6428 -- and destroy the related message.  Thank you for
your cooperation.

==
--- PRESBYTERIAN HEALTHCARE SERVICES DISCLAIMER ---

This message originates from Presbyterian Healthcare Services or one of its
affiliated organizations. It contains information, which may be confidential
or privileged, and is intended only for the individual or entity named above.
It is prohibited for anyone else to disclose, copy, distribute or use the
contents of this message. All personal messages express views solely of the
sender, which are not to be attributed to Presbyterian Healthcare Services or
any of its affiliated organizations, and may not be distributed without this
disclaimer. If you received this message in error, please notify us
immediately at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
==


Re: ANS1312E Server Media Mount Not Possible

2003-10-15 Thread Cynthia Leon
The same problem occured for me when I went to release 5.1.7.  It is a known
problem.  You have to increase the Maximum Mount Points Allowed to 999.  A
fix is in the works, but not yet available.  With release 5.1.7, the mount
points are not being released.  Please refer to IC37274.

Thanks,
Cynthia Leon
Systems Programmer

Presbyterian Healthcare Services
2501 Buena Vista SE
Albuquerque, NM 87106
505-923-6903

-Original Message-
From: Thach, Kevin G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 7:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ANS1312E Server Media Mount Not Possible


I have some large servers that have their data bound to a management class
which directs the data directly to a primary tape pool.  This pool has a
copystgpool defined.  Therefore, when these clients backup at night, their
data is simultaneously written to the onsite and offsite tape copy.

My library is a 3584 with 12 LTO1 drives.

Everything has been working just great for many months, but on Monday I
upgraded the version and the OS on my TSM server.  I went from 5.1.6.2 to
5.1.7.3 and from AIX 4.3.3ML9 to AIX 5.1.0ML3.

All clients are running the 5.1.5 AIX TSM client.  They have been for many
months.

Since the upgrade, I have started getting the "ANS1312E Server Media Mount
Not Possible".

The RESOURCEUTILIZATION parameter was set to 4 on a few of the clients, but
was not set on others.
The MAXNUMMP for all the clients was set at the default of 2.

As I mentioned, it worked just fine this way before the server upgrade.

This morning, I read some other emails of people with a similar problem and
one said to raise the MAXNUMMP to 4.

I did this, and it started working again.

Could someone please explain to me why I needed to do this?  Each client is
still only mounting two tapes (one for onsite and one for offsite).

Was it broken before and now it's fixed, or vice-versa?

Thanks!

This E-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION intended only
for the use of the Individual(s) named above.  If you are not the intended
recipient of this E-mail, or the employee or agent responsible for
delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination or copying of this E-mail is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this E-mail in error, please immediately notify us at (865)
374-4900 or notify us by E-mail at [EMAIL PROTECTED]

==
--- PRESBYTERIAN HEALTHCARE SERVICES DISCLAIMER ---

This message originates from Presbyterian Healthcare Services or one of its
affiliated organizations. It contains information, which may be confidential
or privileged, and is intended only for the individual or entity named above.
It is prohibited for anyone else to disclose, copy, distribute or use the
contents of this message. All personal messages express views solely of the
sender, which are not to be attributed to Presbyterian Healthcare Services or
any of its affiliated organizations, and may not be distributed without this
disclaimer. If you received this message in error, please notify us
immediately at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
==


Re: ANS1312E Server Media Mount Not Possible

2003-10-15 Thread Cynthia Leon
The same problem occured for me when I went to release 5.1.7.  It is a known
problem.  You have to increase the Maximum Mount Points Allowed to 999.  A
fix is in the works, but not yet available.  With release 5.1.7, the mount
points are not being released.  Please refer to IC37274.

Thanks,
Cynthia Leon
Systems Programmer

Presbyterian Healthcare Services
2501 Buena Vista SE
Albuquerque, NM 87106
505-923-6903


-Original Message-
From: Thach, Kevin G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 7:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ANS1312E Server Media Mount Not Possible


I have some large servers that have their data bound to a management class
which directs the data directly to a primary tape pool.  This pool has a
copystgpool defined.  Therefore, when these clients backup at night, their
data is simultaneously written to the onsite and offsite tape copy.

My library is a 3584 with 12 LTO1 drives.

Everything has been working just great for many months, but on Monday I
upgraded the version and the OS on my TSM server.  I went from 5.1.6.2 to
5.1.7.3 and from AIX 4.3.3ML9 to AIX 5.1.0ML3.

All clients are running the 5.1.5 AIX TSM client.  They have been for many
months.

Since the upgrade, I have started getting the "ANS1312E Server Media Mount
Not Possible".

The RESOURCEUTILIZATION parameter was set to 4 on a few of the clients, but
was not set on others.
The MAXNUMMP for all the clients was set at the default of 2.

As I mentioned, it worked just fine this way before the server upgrade.

This morning, I read some other emails of people with a similar problem and
one said to raise the MAXNUMMP to 4.

I did this, and it started working again.

Could someone please explain to me why I needed to do this?  Each client is
still only mounting two tapes (one for onsite and one for offsite).

Was it broken before and now it's fixed, or vice-versa?

Thanks!

This E-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION intended only
for the use of the Individual(s) named above.  If you are not the intended
recipient of this E-mail, or the employee or agent responsible for
delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination or copying of this E-mail is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this E-mail in error, please immediately notify us at (865)
374-4900 or notify us by E-mail at [EMAIL PROTECTED]

==
--- PRESBYTERIAN HEALTHCARE SERVICES DISCLAIMER ---

This message originates from Presbyterian Healthcare Services or one of its
affiliated organizations. It contains information, which may be confidential
or privileged, and is intended only for the individual or entity named above.
It is prohibited for anyone else to disclose, copy, distribute or use the
contents of this message. All personal messages express views solely of the
sender, which are not to be attributed to Presbyterian Healthcare Services or
any of its affiliated organizations, and may not be distributed without this
disclaimer. If you received this message in error, please notify us
immediately at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
==