Re: getting the return code within a postschedcmd?

2020-07-14 Thread Eugene Klaus
Bjorn,

Yes, It is my opinion you are correct in your assumption.


On 7/14/20, Bjørn Nachtwey  wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> is there any way to get the return code of the backup using a postschedcmd?
>
> I would think there might be a environment variable that holds the RC,
> but i found no information on that. Maybe there's also a better way?
>
> if not i might take the fact the postschedcmd is run at all the RC of
> the backup itself must be 0 or 4  -- as otherwise the postschedcmd won't
> run. Any opionions on this approach?
>
> thanks & best
> Bjørn
>
> --
> --
> Bjørn Nachtwey
>
> Arbeitsgruppe "IT-Infrastruktur“
> Tel.: +49 551 201-2181, E-Mail: bjoern.nacht...@gwdg.de
> --
> Gesellschaft für wissenschaftliche Datenverarbeitung mbH Göttingen (GWDG)
> Am Faßberg 11, 37077 Göttingen, URL: https://www.gwdg.de
>
> Support: Tel.: +49 551 201-1523, URL: https://www.gwdg.de/support
> Sekretariat: Tel.: +49 551 201-1510, Fax: -2150, E-Mail: g...@gwdg.de
>
> Geschäftsführer: Prof. Dr. Ramin Yahyapour
> Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Prof. Dr. Christian Griesinger
> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Göttingen
> Registergericht: Göttingen, Handelsregister-Nr. B 598
>
> Zertifiziert nach ISO 9001
> --
>


-- 
Regards,

Eugene A. Klaus Jr.
genekl...@gmail.com / klaus.eu...@gmx.com
(586) 506-1910


Re: ADSM, throughput, and exchanging ATM for 100MB Ethernet.

2000-11-25 Thread Eugene Klaus

That depends on a number of factors. I have experienced doing backup with a
SP/widenode for 100 servers filling a 150 gig
disk pool and then migrating to tape. It was close and needed upgrade, however,
it worked. The main portion of the process to suffer was the admistrative
function that are necessary each day.+

Other possibilities are to bring up an additional server thereby doubling your
backup window.

If it is just speed your concerned with the 100mb ethernet will be running at
about 2/3 of the ATM but with the appropriate
adjustments to your schedules etc. it should work quite well.

Gene Klaus



Re: NIC Question

2000-11-21 Thread Eugene Klaus

At one historical point everyone had only one name!





Nicholas Cassimatis [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 11/20/2000 12:39:45 PM

Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: Eugene A Klaus/Flagstar_notes)
Subject:  Re: NIC Question



Not to be picky, but aren't saints known by their first name???

Nick Cassimatis
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

"I'm one cookie away from happy." - Snoopy (Charles Schulz)



Re: Administration GUI Client?

2000-11-20 Thread Eugene Klaus

Dave,

Yes there are. Pull down the client for Win32. It has both the client for backup
and an
administrative client.

Gene Klaus
UNIX Systems Administrator
Flagstar Bank
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 11/19/2000 05:43:18 PM

Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: Eugene A Klaus/Flagstar_notes)
Subject:  Administration GUI Client?



Hi, Folks.

Are there any GUI-based ADSM administration clients available for either
Windows NT or
OS/2? The ADSM server in question is ADSM V3.1, running on VM/ESA. Many
thanks.

Dave Jones
V/Soft Software
Houston, TX
(281) 578-7544 (v)
(281) 578-1899 (f)
www.vsoft-software.com



Re: NIC Question

2000-11-20 Thread Eugene Klaus

Terry,

That is the nature of ether net. All outgoing info is through your primary card.
You can receive on any of the three.

Gene Klaus





"Barth, Terry (MBS)" [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 11/20/2000 08:47:38 AM

Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: Eugene A Klaus/Flagstar_notes)
Subject:  NIC Question



Hello All -

I have a sun solaris ADSM server that has 3 NIC cards. We would like to
utilize all 3 NIC cards for backups and restores, independently.  We set up
the cards according to SUN and everything seems fine on that end. However,
when a backup starts off, it sends all data through the first NIC card and
then when it receives data, it spans through all 3 cards. Our switch
recognizes all 3 cards, but as soon as a backup begins on one of the other
NICS - say for instance, 48.22, the MAC disappears and the switch no longer
recognizes the card.  We feel that there is something on the ADSM server
side that we need to set up so that if we tell a client to do a backup and
designate that the server has an IP address of xx.xx.48.22, that all
communications will go through this NIC card and not touch the others.

xx.xx.48.20
xx.xx.48.21
xx.xx.48.22

My question is, what is it that I need to set up on the ADSM server side, so
that it uses each NIC card independently.

I have placed the IP address in the opt file on the client end. Is there
something that I need to do on the server end?

Any assistance will be appreciated.

Thanks

Terry



Re: NIC Question

2000-11-20 Thread Eugene Klaus

That is true. Direct the client to communuicate with the IP of an auxiliary
card. All large quantity data communication from the client to the server will
go to the auxiliary IP, however, the communication from the server will return
to the client via the primary NIC. This is not really a problem since it is
brief cammands for the most part. The  clinker is during restores.

Gene Klaus





"Barth, Terry (MBS)" [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 11/20/2000 10:37:40 AM

Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: Eugene A Klaus/Flagstar_notes)
Subject:  Re: NIC Question



But I have heard that you can set up the 3 NIC cards to be independent for
the backups.

My problem is, when we kick off a backup, since these 3 NIC cards on a the
same VLAN, the switch drops the MAC address of the other 2 and thus, floods
the VLAN.

Any suggestions?

-Original Message-
From: Eugene Klaus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2000 10:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: NIC Question


Terry,

That is the nature of ether net. All outgoing info is through your primary
card.
You can receive on any of the three.

Gene Klaus





"Barth, Terry (MBS)" [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 11/20/2000 08:47:38
AM

Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: Eugene A Klaus/Flagstar_notes)
Subject:  NIC Question



Hello All -

I have a sun solaris ADSM server that has 3 NIC cards. We would like to
utilize all 3 NIC cards for backups and restores, independently.  We set up
the cards according to SUN and everything seems fine on that end. However,
when a backup starts off, it sends all data through the first NIC card and
then when it receives data, it spans through all 3 cards. Our switch
recognizes all 3 cards, but as soon as a backup begins on one of the other
NICS - say for instance, 48.22, the MAC disappears and the switch no longer
recognizes the card.  We feel that there is something on the ADSM server
side that we need to set up so that if we tell a client to do a backup and
designate that the server has an IP address of xx.xx.48.22, that all
communications will go through this NIC card and not touch the others.

xx.xx.48.20
xx.xx.48.21
xx.xx.48.22

My question is, what is it that I need to set up on the ADSM server side, so
that it uses each NIC card independently.

I have placed the IP address in the opt file on the client end. Is there
something that I need to do on the server end?

Any assistance will be appreciated.

Thanks

Terry



Re: Windows NT Restore Performance

2000-11-16 Thread Eugene Klaus

Josh,

Are you the fellow formely with Dickens?

At any rate I have had this same problem.
To solve it we developed a plan using 2 (can be more than 2) clients. The
process was set up utilizing an exclusion listing based upon the alpha location.
Client-A backed up all directories starting with [a-j]* and excluded all
directories begining with
[k-z]*. Client-B reversed the roles. The major problem is to determine the data
load. It may require some digging to balance
where the load is. In our case it was noted that [a-j]* held little data while
[k-z]* had copious quantities. Tha answer was to adjust this number of clients
to reflect a reasonable level of data and to provide the maximum threads
possible for backup.

This means also, that the administrators must be aware of the root directories
for files requested for restore. This means they must come to work with there
brains engaged.

Respectfully,


Gene Klaus
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
248-709-2100




"Joshua S. Bassi" [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 11/16/2000 02:56:45 PM

Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: Eugene A Klaus/Flagstar_notes)
Subject:  Re: Windows NT Restore Performance



Unfortunately my customer has created one huge data partition with only
one main directory on it.  There are 2000 small directories under that
directory. So there is really no way to run multiple streams against
that.  And to top it off it is not only a compressed NTFS volume, but
a 3-4 disk RAID-5 set, so when I use the GUI for the restore, it only
fires off 2 streams (1 for send  1 for receive).

Thank you,

Josh

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Kelly J. Lipp
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2000 11:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Windows NT Restore Performance


About 10 GB/Hour is what I see with a single stream.  Get a couple of
streams working on the problem and you can saturate the network.  I assume a
100 MBit network.

Kelly J. Lipp
Storage Solutions Specialists, Inc.
PO Box 51313
Colorado Springs CO 80949-1313
(719) 531-5926
Fax: (719) 260-5991
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.storsol.com
www.storserver.com


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Joshua S. Bassi
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2000 12:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Windows NT Restore Performance


All,

What type of performance are you getting backing up Windows NT
servers to an RS6K ADSM server?  I have a customer who was
getting 650KBps on a restore from a disk storage pool.  After
I made some performance tuning changes (i.e. TCPWindowsize 32,
TCPBuffsize 32, upgrade the client to 4.1.1.16, Resource 10,
largecom yes, txnbytelimit 25600 etc.) our performance is up
to 1.29MBps.  That still seemed slow.  Then I found that my
customer is using NTFS compression for the entire data
partition.  When we turned compressed off and also uncompressed
the data before backup, our transfer rates got up to 3.1MBps
- that's 11GBph.

1) What type of rates are everybody seeing on NT file system
restores?

2) If we backup the data with the compressed attribute, and
then uncompress the entire volume including the data, then
restore the data from ADSM, the data comes back compressed
on the file system bringing my rate down to the 1.29MBps.
I would like it to come backup from ADSM on the NTFS file
system uncompressed so that the restore will be at the
3.1MBps rate, but I haven't found a way to do that. Is there?

AIX 4.2.1 ADSM 3.1.1.5 (upgrade plan in progress)
Windows NT SP5 TSM 4.1.1.16
Average file size 65KB
100 Ethernet fast-duplex hard-coded

We are not retrying to backup files and we are not using
client compression.


--
Joshua S. Bassi
IBM Certified- AIX Support, HACMP, SAN
Enterprise Disk(Shark) Tape Solutions
Tivoli Certified Consultant - ADSM/TSM
Cell (408) 332-4006
[EMAIL PROTECTED]