TDP DOMINO for E-mail missing backup

2007-07-12 Thread Frank Tsao, email is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We are experiencing missing backup for TDP DOMINO on Lotus notes E-mail.
Does anyone had similar experiences/fixes?

We are running DOMINO 6.5.5, TDP for DOMINO 5.3.0.0 and with NT 2000
operating system.

Thanks.

Frank Tsao
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PAX 25803, 626-302-5803
FAX 626-302-7131


LAN free TSM set up in Gresham environment

2007-06-26 Thread Frank Tsao, email is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We are in the process of doing proof of concept of LAN free under Gresham
environment. I like to know for whoever uses this type of structure how
many LAN free client do you have? Also, I like to find out are you using
TSM domain or management class to control the client?
How many domain do you have for LAN free client?


Thanks.


Frank Tsao
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PAX 25803, 626-302-5803
FAX 626-302-7131


Re: TSM 5.3.3 loaddb and audit problem

2006-05-17 Thread Frank Tsao, email is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Richard,

Is there any way can minimize the fragmentation? For example, like how
much maximum reduction size should have before the database reach a point
of no response.

Frank Tsao
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PAX 25803, 626-302-5803
FAX 626-302-7131



Richard Sims [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
05/17/2006 05:09 AM
Please respond to
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU


To
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc

Subject
Re: TSM 5.3.3 loaddb and audit problem






Hi, Kelly -

I was appalled when I first saw TSM manuals blithely enticing
customers to reorganize their TSM databases as though it were some
kind of risk-free, trivial undertaking. Nowhere in the documentation
for this procedure are there the strong advisories which should be
there regarding the prolonged unavailability which your site's data
recovery facility will experience during the procedure, full
perspective on why it might ever be warranted, the risks involved,
what messages to expect, how to know whether or not the operation has
succeeded, or what to do in case of a problem. Conspicuously missing
is any mention that the utilities involved are not mainstream TSM
software, but rather salvage utilities - which get little developer
attention or testing (as is evident in the frightening APARs I've
read on these utilities).

To my experienced eye, this was an extraordinarily irresponsible
thing for IBM to do, and a recipe for disaster. TSM novices in
particular will see this in the manual, think it harmless because IBM
offers it, and launch right into it. Unfortunately, the disaster
potential has been borne out by customers writing to ADSM-L for help
upon discovering the hard way that their TSM database is no longer
viable after the operation. (And we don't know how many more
customers have suffered silently.)

It is high risk stuff, and almost always unwarranted, as customers
are typically trying it expecting it to be some panacea for their
system. Without an understanding of databases in general and the TSM
db specifically, a customer is wandering through an unfamiliar house
in the dark in such an undertaking, where the risk of getting hurt is
high.

The fact is that IBM *DOES NOT* have suitable software for its TSM
customers to use to reorganize the TSM database. Salvage utilities,
by their nature, are VERY physical in their orientation and
operation, with no customer-meaningful feedback during execution and
no customer-oriented assurance summary at conclusion.  (I speak from
experience in having run these utilities - and having seen no
enduring performance or space benefit.)  And, again, these utilities
are not part of the main product and, as tributary software,
receive little developmental attention. Such software is wholly
unsuitable for this purported usage. And the encouraging but
unadvising documentation only makes the situation worse.

I can't imagine who, at what level in IBM, thought it was a good idea
to suggest that salvage utilities be promoted as a means for
accomplishing vaguely described goals.  It boggles my mind that IBM
would encourage their enterprise customers to blindly risk their
corporate recovery vehicles, to no well-defined end.  I simply do not
understand how a technical organization could have decided upon such
an ill-conceived and irresponsible course of action.

I strongly believe that all documentation for the use of these
utilities for TSM db reorganization should be removed from the TSM
manuals.  If at some time in the future, IBM can provide a true,
customer-suitable TSM database reorganization function - AND a full
rationale for engaging in such an undertaking - then such may be
reintroduced to the documentation set.

Thankfully, we have this forum to try to keep customers from getting
into trouble when someone suggests actions which we experienced
technicians know are just plain bad.

To all the novice customers:  Get the whole story on a major
procedure before considering undertaking it.

 Richard Sims

On May 17, 2006, at 7:08 AM, Kelly Lipp wrote:

 Richard,

 I could not agree more on your stance regarding Dump/Load.
 However, I'm
 in Holland teaching a Level 2 class and have been surprised to learn
 that a lot of my students perform this action as a matter of course on
 their servers.  The objective is to reduce the size of aged TSM
 databases.  In TSM 5.3 we have new functionality to determine if a db
 reorg would reclaim a significant amount of space.  Then the Dump/load
 is executed to get this space.  Do you suppose this new command is
 encouraging us to do something that is high risk?  Alternatives?

 I guess they've decided the risk is worth the potential gain.

 I personally have not experience the problem so have not attempted
 this
 solution.


How do TSM decide need to copy tape

2006-04-03 Thread Frank Tsao, email is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I had an interesting situation: A volume in primary pool had a read error.
I used q vol f=d and found the last date of data written is around
January. Since then, I had several good backup on this tape. However, I
found on March 26, it had requested to make copy of this tape. Since this
tape is in error condition, the copy failed.

Do I have good data on the copy tape?

How do TSM decide need to copy tape?

How reliable I can trust the last read or written date?

Thanks for your help.

Frank Tsao
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PAX 25803, 626-302-5803
FAX 626-302-7131


Control of data flow in collocation group environment

2005-06-07 Thread Frank Tsao, email is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can I have the control of the data flow in the collocation group set up
environment? For example, I like to have collocation group A moving their
data through migration to storage pool A.

If the answer is yes, where is the control? I do not find in the def
collocgroup or def stg help menu.

Thanks for the response.

Frank Tsao
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PAX 25803, 626-302-5803
FAX 626-302-7131


Re: How to find out all drives in NT2000 using command line? Thanks

2005-04-26 Thread Frank Tsao, email is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I had talked to several people and found that dumpcfg utility would
generate the data I am looking for.

Thanks for all your help and effort.

Frank Tsao
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PAX 25803, 626-302-5803
FAX 626-302-7131



 Andrew Raibeck
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 OMTo
 Sent by: ADSM:   ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Dist Stor  cc
 Manager
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject
 .EDU Re: How to find out all drives in
   NT2000 using command line? Thanks

 04/25/2005 09:16
 AM


 Please respond to
 ADSM: Dist Stor
 Manager
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   .EDU







Hi Frank,

There is no command that I can think of that does this; you'd have to write
a program or script to do it. Here are sample script and C++ program (they
both do the same thing). If these are useful, tailor as you wish.

Regards,

Andy


WMI SCRIPT

' ListDrives.vbs
' Invoke by running
'
'cscript ListDrives.vbs
'
' from an OS command prompt.
strComputer = .

set objWMIService = GetObject(winmgmts: _
 {impersonationLevel=impersonate}!\\ _
 strComputer  \root\cimv2)

set disks = objWMIService.ExecQuery (select * from Win32_LogicalDisk)

for each objDisk in disks
   select case objDisk.DriveType
  case 0
 ' I would not normally expect to see this.
 Wscript.Echo objDisk.DeviceID   Unknown
  case 1
 Wscript.Echo objDisk.DeviceID   Invalid root path
  case 2
 Wscript.Echo objDisk.DeviceID   Removable
  case 3
 Wscript.Echo objDisk.DeviceID   Fixed
  case 4
 Wscript.Echo objDisk.DeviceID   Remote
  case 5
 Wscript.Echo objDisk.DeviceID   CD-ROM
  case 6
 Wscript.Echo objDisk.DeviceID   RAM disk
  case Else
 ' I would not normally expect to see this.
 Wscript.Echo objDisk.DeviceID   ??
   end select
next




C++ PROGRAM

/*
 ListDrive.cpp

 Compiled with Visual Studio .Net 2003 from an OS prompt as follows:

   cl /GX /Zi /O1 ListDrives.cpp /link /debug
*/
#include windows.h
#include cstdio
#include cmath
#include iostream

using namespace std;

int main()
{
   char  driveLetter[] = *:\\;
   DWORD drives= GetLogicalDrives();
   DWORD bit   = 0;

   if (!drives)
   {
  cout  ERROR: GetLogicalDrives() failed with rc 
GetLastError()  endl;
  return -1;
   }

   for (int i = 0, bit = 1; i != 26; i++, bit *= 2)
   {
  if (drives  bit)
  {
 cout  char('A' + i)  : ;
 driveLetter[0] = 'A' + i;

 switch (GetDriveType(driveLetter))
 {
case DRIVE_UNKNOWN:
   // I would not normally expect to see this.
   cout  Unknown;
   break;
case DRIVE_NO_ROOT_DIR:
   cout  Invalid root path;
   break;
case DRIVE_REMOVABLE:
   cout  Removable;
   break;
case DRIVE_FIXED:
   cout  Fixed;
   break;
case DRIVE_REMOTE:
   cout  Remote;
   break;
case DRIVE_CDROM:
   cout  CD-ROM;
   break;
case DRIVE_RAMDISK:
   cout  RAM disk;
   break;
default:
   // I would not normally expect to see this.
   cout  ??;
   break;
 }   // switch (...)

 cout  endl;
  }   // if (drives  bit)
   }   // for (...)

   cout  endl;

   return 0;
}


Regards,

Andy

Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The command line is your friend.
Good enough is the enemy of excellence.

ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 2005-04-22
14:05:23:

 Frank Tsao
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 PAX 25803, 626-302-5803
 FAX 626-302-7131[attachment ListDrives.cpp deleted by Frank
Tsao/SCE/EIX]

Attachment ListDrives.vbs contains a potentially harmful file type
extension and was removed in accordance with IBM IT content security
practices.


Re: How to find out all drives in NT2000 using command line? Thanks

2005-04-25 Thread Frank Tsao, email is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks, Richards.

It is close but that is not what I am looking for.

I want to find drive letter installed on a NT2000 system.

For example, issue find_drive_of_all_systems will return results as

C:
E:
F:
J:
K:


Frank Tsao
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PAX 25803, 626-302-5803
FAX 626-302-7131



 Richard Sims
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent by: ADSM:To
 Dist Stor ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Manager   cc
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 .EDU Subject
   Re: How to find out all drives in
   NT2000 using command line? Thanks
 04/24/2005 04:27
 AM


 Please respond to
 ADSM: Dist Stor
 Manager
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   .EDU






Frank -

You may find the DevCon utility useful for Windows command line work:

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/q311272/

and  www.robvanderwoude.com/devcon.html

  Richard Sims


How to find out all drives in NT2000 using command line? Thanks

2005-04-22 Thread Frank Tsao, email is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Frank Tsao
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PAX 25803, 626-302-5803
FAX 626-302-7131


STK drives go off line after upgraded to TSM 5.2.3

2004-12-07 Thread Frank Tsao, email is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We are running 5.2.1 and suffered core dump every ten days. So, I upgraded
the system to 5.2.3. Now we had a problem STK drives 9940B, one by one goes
off-line until there is no drive is on line.

We are running

AIX 5.2-ML3, STK 7.0.0.2 EDT 6.4 with SAN switch connected between P60 and
STK Silo.

Any clues or similar experience.

Thanks.

Frank Tsao
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PAX 25803, 626-302-5803
FAX 626-302-7131


Re: Node very very slow for incremental backup

2003-06-04 Thread Frank Tsao, email is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What is your AIX version? If it is AIX 5.1 it should be at ML4.

Frank Tsao
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PAX 25803, 626-302-5803
FAX 626-302-7131



  Dave Canan
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  L.NET   cc:
  Sent by: ADSM:  Subject:  Re: Node very very slow for 
incremental backup
  Dist Stor
  Manager
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  .EDU


  06/03/2003 12:21
  PM
  Please respond to
  ADSM: Dist Stor
  Manager






I would not change the TCPWINDOWSIZE for this client - 63 is what we
recommend for this platform.

The trace you sent indicates a large percentage of time being spent (97%)
in the process dirs category. This category represents the amount of time
spent inspecting directories and files before any backups occur. Journaling
in this case definitely would help reduce the maount of time for the
backup. Additional questions:

 1. Are there any deep directory structures that have recently
been introduced on the system?
 2. Have there recently been any new applications added to the box
that have added substantially to the number of files on the box?

Look into journaling - it will definitely help.


At 08:43 PM 6/3/2003 +0200, you wrote:
You may want to change your TCPWindowSize   from 63 to 1024

- Original Message -
From: David Rigaudiere [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 26, 2003 3:36 PM
Subject: Node very very slow for incremental backup


Hi *SMers,
I have a probleme whit a node.

Client 4.2.1.15 WinNT
Server 5.1.6.3  AIX

This node is very very slow to backups.
14H for less 6GB !! (1H is a normal backup time)

The sysadmins said no change on this node

I can't find where is the probleme, the node
spent a lot of time to browse files and directories.

A performance analyse when node is backuping does not
show a bottleneck (memory, CPU, I/O ...)
I tested a selective or big restore, without problem.
(Data transfer rate: 10,000 to 12,000 KB/sec)

Maybee I must install journal based backup but yesterday
it worked perfectly without it...

you're my only hope, do you have an idea ?


dsm.opt :
=

TCPWindowSize63
TCPBuffSize  31
TCPNodelay   YES
SubDir   YES
Compression  YES
CompressAlways   NO
SchedModePolling  * (behind Firewall)




It is a session report :


Total number of objects inspected:  192,386
Total number of objects backed up:2,221
Total number of objects updated:  8
Total number of objects rebound:  0
Total number of objects deleted:  0
Total number of objects expired:523
Total number of objects failed:   0
Total number of bytes transferred: 5.89 GB
Data transfer time:1,416.29 sec
Network data transfer rate:4,362.30 KB/sec
Aggregate data transfer rate:119.69 KB/sec
Objects compressed by:   15%
Elapsed processing time:14:20:17




and a trace report :


Section TotalTime(sec)Average Time(msec)Frequency used
==
Client Setup 0.344344.0  1
Process Dirs 50292.881   2250.6  22346
Solve Tree   0.000  0.0  0
Compute  2.677  0.0 304175
Transaction 46.145  0.0 938009
BeginTxn Verb0.047  0.1508
File I/O   164.261  0.7 241799
Compression372.440  2.3 164443
Encryption   0.000  0.0  0
Delta0.000  0.0  0
Data Verb0.297  8.3 36
Confirm Verb 0.297  8.3 36
EndTxn Verb541.249   1065.5508
Client Cleanup   2.735   2735.0  1




--
David  Rigaudiere  -+-  Administration  TSM  -+-
Paris -+- 40, rue de Courcelles -+- 4e itage -+-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -+- 01.5621.7802


---
This message (including any attachments) is confidential and may be
privileged. If you have received it by mistake please notify the sender by
return e-mail and delete this message from your system. Any unauthorised
use or dissemination of this message in whole or in part is strictly
prohibited. Please note that e-mails are susceptible to change.
ABN AMRO Bank N.V. (including its group companies) shall not be liable for
the improper or incomplete

Re: Version 4.2.1.7

2001-11-15 Thread Frank Tsao, email is [EMAIL PROTECTED]

We will need 4.2.1.7 because it fixes license registration problem. In
4.2.1.6, you can only register a license file once. So, total of license
could register is 66.  We would have problems when the clients exceed 66.
And the noncompliant message would flood our activity log.

Frank Tsao
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PAX 25803, 626-302-5803
FAX 626-302-7131



Wouter V
wouter-v@EASTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
YNET.BE cc:
Sent by: Subject: Re: Version 4.2.1.7
ADSM: Dist
Stor Manager
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RIST.EDU


11/15/2001
08:35 AM
Please
respond to
ADSM: Dist
Stor Manager






What problems did you have on 4.2.1.6 (because I'm also using this level
and
don't have a problem).

Regards,

Wouter.


-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Namens Rafael
Mendez
Verzonden: donderdag 15 november 2001 16:36
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: Version 4.2.1.7


Hi all,
Does anyone have installed the 4.2.1.7 patch for TSM server?
We are planning to install this patch but we want to know if the problems
on
4.2.1.6 version are fixed.
Any comments?
TIA
Rafael Mindez
Prosol Ingenierma
Madrid-Spain




--

Obtin gratis tu cuenta de correo en StarMedia Email.
!Regmstrate hoy mismo!. http://www.starmedia.com/email



--



Re: TSM Bare Restore AIX Different Arch

2001-08-22 Thread Frank Tsao, email is [EMAIL PROTECTED]

We had used SYSBACK to perform three functions in addition to TSM:

Copy rootvg to a SYSBACK server on a monthly basis. Total of 200+ systems.
Cut a tape remotely for all systems on a semiannual basis.
Create a network boot option and refreshed all the bootp servers and boot
client roles on a quarterly basis.

You can see SYSBACK features in the following URL:

http://sysback.services.ibm.com/sysback.nsf/en/features

Frank Tsao
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PAX 25803, 626-302-5803
FAX 626-302-7131



Kauffman,
Tom To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
KauffmanT@NIcc:
BCO.COM Subject: Re: TSM Bare Restore AIX 
Different Arch
Sent by:
ADSM: Dist
Stor Manager
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RIST.EDU


08/22/2001
08:50 AM
Please
respond to
ADSM: Dist
Stor Manager






Dave, we use much the same approach as your current one, with similar
problems on the mksysb. We try to run a mksysb at least monthly, or after
maintenance is applied to AIX.

The difference is that our mksysb tapes go off-site after we cut them.

Is there any reason you can't do this?

If you really can't off-site the mksysb tapes, I'd seriously look at
setting
up one system as a network install master with just AIX and TSM on it. Back
when we had the SP frames this was our Control Workstation. It had one
current mksysb image file, for the TSM server.

Get this box up, network install the TSM server, use TSM to restore the
filesystem of current (weekly, in our case) mksysb images for the other
systems, and network install them.

You still have the problem of getting an off-site non-tsm backup of this
system though -- unless your D/R window is long enough to allow building
the
TSM server with a 'vanilla' AIX image, followed by restoring the filesystem
of images, followed by re-booting the TSM server again from the archived
image.

Tom Kauffman
NIBCO, Inc

 -Original Message-
 From: Dave Z [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 9:42 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: TSM Bare Restore AIX Different Arch


 Folks,

 I apologize if this is a FAQ

 (I cannot find a complete documented procedure)

 :0(


 Currently, we use the following procedure to restore systems:

 1) Restore the OS using the cloaner method as published by IBM:
a) Boot off of the AIX installation media
b) Restore system from tape (mksysb)
   (This allows you to recover the OS to dissimilar hardware)
 2) Reconstruct the network (including the TSM backup network).
 3) Restore all application data (and system data if needed) via TSM.

 This methodology does not support a true DR test as our
 mksysb tapes are
 not cut regularly or vaulted.

 Unfortunately we do not have a solution that allows us to cut
 bootable AIX
 tapes on a regular basis.  (Not all of the systems have local
 tape drives.
 The procedure can not be automated. etc.)

 In the future we must restore all RS/6000s with only our vaulted
 installation media (OS and TSM) as well as our vaulted TSM
 tapes.  Due to
 this we must develop procedures for a total bare metal restore of an
 RS/6000 using only the OS installation media, TSM backup
 tapes, and any
 relevant TSM disaster recovery reports.

 We would like to develop a procedure that details the
 recovery of a generic
 RS/6000 using only installation media, TSM backup, and
 disaster recovery
 reports.

 Ideas/Things to consider:

 We can not assume that we will recover systems to identical
 hardware.  As
 such we can not simply install a base OS and restore.
  What system files (/etc/passwd, /etc/hosts, etc...) are
 relevant to the
 recovery of the system.
  What system files should not be recovered?  (I.e. kernel,
 driver specific,
 etc.)


 Can anyone help with any existing procedures or point me in the proper
 direction?

 Thanks!


 DaveZ