Re: Large disk concerns/alternatives ?

2009-08-25 Thread Gerald Michalak
My money is on the SATA disk pool.  I ran into something similar with many
spindles of SATA disk and was expecting it to fly. nope.

We found out that not only was the disk I/O not as expected but that device
the disks were in only had 2 I/O ports that were supposed to be in failover
mode. But we had both running at over 80% utilization !!!

Replaced that external box with some internal drives and controllers and
then the system starting moving data.


Gerald Michalak
TSM - Certified V5 Administrator






"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 08/24/2009
09:21:52 PM:

> Sumthin' wrong with those numbers.
>
> If you have a GigE pipe, you should be able to send 70-80 MB/sec.  thats
> 400+ MB/min, 240+ GB per hour, 4+ TB in 24 hours.
>
> So, either
> - your clients are having performance issues with their own disks
> - maybe you have compression or something else slowing down the client:?
> - maybe your client NIC isn't really set to GigE
> - You have a switch somewhere that is not pumping GigE...
> - Your NIC on the TSM SERVER is maxed out
>
> Or something like that.  I'd try some testing with FTP, to see where the
> bottleneck is, before deciding this isn't feasible.
>
> W
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Ochs, Duane  wrote:
>
> > Good day everyone,
> > I'm looking for some workable suggestions for larger lun backups.
> > I'm talking 1.5tb and larger lun sizes. I have a number of remote sites
> > that have large quantities of hi-res image files and they need an
offsite
> > backup solution. Usually we are notified before the disks go into
production
> > and the backups grow as the disk is populated.
> > Normally not a big deal. Now we are in the middle of a large conversion
for
> > many remote sites which will require a full backup for all of the
sites. And
> > each has in excess of 6 tb of images. In addition we are also migrating
a
> > number of rogue sites to TSM which also have in excess of 4tb locally.
> >
> > I tried a test and ran one disk as a full over a 1gb pipe to 2tb of TSM
> > diskpool on Sata disks. It has been running for 3 days. Not only is it
not
> > acceptable in a real DR scenario (Currently we restore to the same site
as
> > the TSM server then move data back in order of importance),but,  it
will
> > also take weeks before I can safely say we are back to being fully
backed
> > up.
> >
> > Other than local backups for each site... has anybody come across a
similar
> > scenario and care to offer some advice.
> >
> > Some specifics: I have 3 TSM servers (AIX) with either a L700 or a T950
> > library.  No data is backed up locally. All data is sent over the
network to
> > a remote TSM server.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Duane
> >


Re: server to server authentication

2009-07-31 Thread Gerald Michalak
You need to issue the"help def server"  command and look at the 2nd
syntax, for virtual volumes, it uses a different syntax for setting
passwords.

Gerald Michalak
TSM - Certified V5 Administrator


"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 07/31/2009
10:03:57 AM:

> I just tried, and it did not help - they are still experiencing
> authentication problems.
>
> Thanks though
>
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Tchuise, Bertaut <
> btchu...@lmus.leggmason.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello Matthew,
> >
> > Have you tried using the forcesync=yes parameter with the upd server
> > command?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > BERTAUT TCHUISE
> > Storage Support Administrator
> > Legg Mason Technology Services
> > *410-580-7032
> > btchu...@leggmason.com
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf
Of
> > Matthew Large
> > Sent: Friday, July 31, 2009 7:30 AM
> > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> > Subject: [ADSM-L] server to server authentication
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > W2k3 TSM 5.5.0.0 server * 2
> >
> > Copy storage pools of FILE deviceclasses with a devtype of SERVER, on
> > each server, using each other as a copy destination
> >
> > When I run space reclaim on one of these pools, hundreds of
> >
> > ANR4373E Session rejected by target server  reason:
> > Authentication Failure
> >
> > I have already reset the server password with SET SERVERPASSWORD and
> > updated the servers with the UPD SERVER SERVERPASSWORD command, but
> > still these messages appear?
> >
> > What else is there which might need authenticating?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Matthew
> >
> > IMPORTANT:  E-mail sent through the Internet is not secure. Legg Mason
> > therefore recommends that you do not send any confidential or sensitive
> > information to us via electronic mail, including social security
numbers,
> > account numbers, or personal identification numbers. Delivery, andor
timely
> > delivery of Internet mail is not guaranteed. Legg Mason therefore
recommends
> > that you do not send time sensitive
> > or action-oriented messages to us via electronic mail.
> >
> > This message is intended for the addressee only and may contain
privileged
> > or confidential information. Unless you are the intended recipient, you
may
> > not use, copy or disclose to anyone any information contained in this
> > message. If you have received this message in error, please notify the
> > author by replying to this message and then kindly delete the message.
Thank
> > you.
> >


Re: Changing volume status with active data to SCRATCH

2009-05-12 Thread Gerald Michalak
I would try to move the data that is on that tape to another tape first.

move data 

then if everything gets moved, you can change the status to scratch.


Gerald Michalak
Certified TSM V5 Administrator



"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 05/12/2009
04:55:02 PM:

> Hi list,
>
> How can I change the status of a particular tape in the LTO Library
> to SCRATCH considering that there is still not expired data on it?
>
> Is there any way to expire this data or tell TSM to ignore it and
> change the tape to SCRATCH?
>
> Thanks
>
> Mario


Re: New TSM Layout

2008-07-31 Thread Gerald Michalak
We had 4 TSM server sharing 4 raid groups in one Clariion.

Although we had plenty of LUNs and many spindles, our problem was that we
were flooding the 2 internal paths of the Clariion.

It really cut into our i/o rates.

Gerald Michalak
IBM





"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 07/31/2008
10:05:28 AM:

> I went through a number of different configurations on our Clariion.  The
> best ended up being to take only 1 LUN from each raid group.  As many
raid
> groups as possible.
> My main TSM server has 19 X 200gB raw volumes for its diskpool.  Each
> volume is from a different raidgroup.
>
> Just try not to use more than one lun from the same raid group.  That's
> when I ran into performance issues.
>
> Regards,
> Shawn
> 
> Shawn Drew
>
>
>
>
>
> Internet
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Sent by: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> 07/31/2008 10:15 AM
> Please respond to
> ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
>
>
> To
> ADSM-L
> cc
>
> Subject
> [ADSM-L] New TSM Layout
>
>
>
>
>
> We are in the process of designing our new TSM server. As part of this
> we are also going to give it new SAN drive space.
>
>
>
> Currently we have 661 Gig in our disk pool and we are upping that to 900
> Gig. What our questions is how should we partition that? Our current
> pool is in 7 partitions but I was thinking more like 3 or 4 partitions.
> Are there any pro's/con's with going with fewer disk partitions?
>
>
> This message and any attachments (the "message") is intended solely for
> the addressees and is confidential. If you receive this message in error,
> please delete it and immediately notify the sender. Any use not in accord
> with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole or
partial,
> is prohibited except formal approval. The internet can not guarantee the
> integrity of this message. BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall
(will)
> not therefore be liable for the message if modified. Please note that
certain
> functions and services for BNP Paribas may be performed by BNP
> Paribas RCC, Inc.


Re: Tapes appear not present in library, but are physically in the library ????

2008-06-06 Thread Gerald Michalak
The first thing I would check is that the tapes are not still in the drives
via ACSLS command 'q dr all' and 'q vol '.

The 'q vol' will give you the status and location of the volume.

When you say you ran an audit, was it an ACSLS audit or a TSM audit?

We've had problems where the drive never actually ejected the tape.



Gerald Michalak
Certified TSM V5 Administrator




   
 Joni Moyer
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 ARK.COM>   To
 Sent by: "ADSM:   ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Dist Stor  cc
 Manager"  
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject
 .EDU> Re: [ADSM-L] Tapes appear not   
   present in library, but are 
   physically in the library   
 06/06/2008 09:49  
 AM
   
   
 Please respond to 
 "ADSM: Dist Stor  
 Manager"  
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   .EDU>   
   
   




Hi Anil,

No, there were no checkouts being done against this tape or any of the
others that I have seen experience this error.  I have narrowed it down to
6 tape drives within the library, most of which are happening on 3.  As
you see below the tape is mounted/dismounted ok and then several hrs.
later it is requested to be mounted again and it says it's not present in
the library when in fact it is.  I have been looking at 25 tapes for this
past week which have experienced this issue and it is all the same.  The
tape is physically in the library (I have checked through ACSLS which is
the software that controls the SUN SL8500) and we also did an audit of the
library at the beginning of the week to resolve this issue, but that
doesn't appear to have helped.  I'm having the vendor of the tape drives
check out the 6 drives to see if it is a hardware issue with the drives or
a robot in the library or something...  but I can't pinpoint what is
causing this issue yet.

Thanks!


Joni Moyer
Highmark
Storage Systems, Storage Mngt Analyst III
Phone Number: (717)302-9966
Fax: (717) 302-9826
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




"Anil Maurya" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 
06/06/2008 10:41 AM
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 


To
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc

Subject
Re: Tapes appear not present in library, but are physically in the library







Looks like someting happened between 06/05/08 01:25:26 and 06/05/08
05:26:07. Did you checkout using option remove=no ?

Good luck


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Joni Moyer
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 8:40 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Tapes appear not present in library, but are
physically in the library 

Hi Everyone,

I have a TSM server 5.3.5.2 on AIX 5.3 with an external library which is
a SUN SL8500 and Gresham EDT manages the drive requests.  I have come
across an issue where the tape is physically in the library, but TSM
says that it is not present.  Any ideas/suggestions on what can be done?
Thanks in advance!

Date/Time Message

--
06/05/08 01:01:33 ANR8337I LTO volume T04269 mounted in drive SL8500

   (/dev/rmt5). (SESSION: 505692, PROCESS: 18285)
06/05/08 01:01:33 ANR0513I Process 18285 opened output volume
T04269.

   (SESSION: 505692, PROCESS: 18285)
06/05/08 01:23:36 ANR0514I Session 505692 closed volume T04269.
(SESSION:
   505692)
06/05/08 01:24:36 ANR8325I Dismounting volume T04269 - 1 minute
mount

   retention expired.
06/05/08 01:24:41 ANR8336I Verifying label of LTO volume T04269 in
drive
   SL

Re: TSM and ACSLS

2008-02-19 Thread Gerald Michalak
Check this site for a quick run down and sample script.

http://www.tsmexpert.org/search/label/ACSLS


Gerald Michalak



"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 02/19/2008
09:35:39 AM:

> Hi *,
>
> We are currently migrating from a 3494 library to an SL8500 library
> ( TSM Server 5.3.5.2 running on AIX 5.3 ML4 ) . Has anyone done this
> ? If so, how did you deal with the ejection of offsite tapes ? It
> appears there is a lot of manual work that needs to be done
> regarding tape handling that was not there when using the 3494 library.
>
> Rich
>
>
> Standard Life : 175 ans au coeur de nos vies
> Standard Life: Part of our lives for 175 years
>
>

Re: TSM ACSLS STK checkin tapes

2008-02-01 Thread Gerald Michalak




I created this script executed via cron at least 2 hours after they are
supposed to load the tapes.


#!/bin/ksh
## set -x

#   GET THE TAPES THAT TSM KNOWS ARE IN LIBRARY
#
dsmadmc -id=reports -pass= -se=librmgr "query libv " > libv.1
grep STK_LIB libv.1 | cut -c18-23 | sort > libv.2

#   GET THE TAPES THAT ARE IN THE LIBRARY
#   our volume labels are Ex
#
/usr/tivoli/tsm/devices/bin/lbtest -f /adsm_restore/libvol.in -o acsls.1
grep VOL=E acsls.1 | cut -c5-10 | sort > acsls.2

#   SEE IF WHAT WE'RE EXPECTING IS IN THE LIBRARY
#
join -v 2 libv.2 acsls.2 > scr.1

#   IF WE FOUND SOME, THEN CREATE COMMANDS TO CHECK THEM IN
#   scr.1 contains the tapes TSM doesn't know about
#
if [[ -s scr.1 ]]
then
dsmadmc -id=reports -pass= -se=librmgr "checkin libv
stk_lib search=yes status=scratch checkl=no
vollist=file:/adsm_restore/scr.1 "

fi

exit 0


Note that I have 4 TSM servers sharing this library hence the
"-se=librmgr".

Good Luck,


Gerald Michalak
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TSM - Certified V5 Administrator




"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 02/01/2008
05:06:04 AM:

> Hello,
>
>
>
> I’ve got a rather obvious question which is the following: how do
> you checkin tapes in a STK library that is controlled by ACSLS
> software?  So far I was mainly working with SCSI libraries in TSM,
> thus the ACSLS libraries are new to me.
>
>
>
> The environment is the following:
>
>
>
> TSM Server 5.4.1.2 on AIX 5.3TL5
>
> STK SL8500 tape library with ACSLS 7.1.0 (Solaris 9)
>
>
>
> The CAP in the STK library is set to manual mode. The CAP cannot be
> set to automatic mode, because other software that uses the STK
> library doesn’t like this.
>
>
>
> If I logon to the ACSLS server and open a ‘cmd_proc –ql’ window, I
> can open the CAP there by issuing the command ‘enter CAP_ID’. The
> CAP is now unlocked and can be opened. The tapes are then added into
> the library and a succesfull checkin message is written in the
> ‘cmd_proc –ql’ window. Which can be left again with a logoff
> command. And then a checkin in TSM with a search into the library
> can be started.
>
>
>
> The latter process should be automated in a script however so that
> the operators can simply enter tapes into the library. Are there
> scripts out there that can be shared for this purpose? Or can the
> enter command on the CAP be given in a oneliner command so that it
> is easily incorporated in a bash script?
>
>
>
> Any feedback and hints from other TSM users with ACSLS libraries is
> more then welcome!
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Kurt
>
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>
> *** Disclaimer ***
>
> Vlaamse Radio- en Televisieomroep
> Auguste Reyerslaan 52, 1043 Brussel
>
> nv van publiek recht
> BTW BE 0244.142.664
> RPR Brussel
> http://www.vrt.be/disclaimer

Re: SL500 LAN-free without ACSLS???

2007-12-12 Thread Gerald Michalak
If you are mounting/unmounting tapes from the current TSM server without
ACSLS then you don't need it for the Storage Agent/LAN-Free backup.

Just let the TSM manage the library.

I'm doing this currently with an STK-L700 library, 2 TSM servers and 10
STA's.


Gerald Michalak
IBM TSM Certified Administrator


AIX GPFS & Oracle RAC

2007-11-14 Thread Gerald Michalak
Does anyone have any suggestions on backing up 4 AIX systems clustered and
using GPFS file systems, supporting Oracle RAC?

I'm currently planning on using domain statements to manage who's backing
up what.


Gerald Michalak
TSM - Certified V5 Administrator

[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Storage Subsystem Failure

2007-07-21 Thread Gerald

I'm not really sure what to make of the failures i'm seeing when doing
an import. Specifically i'm not sure how to obtain more information
about the failure showing up in errpt. Appreciate any help/direction
on how to interpret the sense data.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/$ lsdev -C | grep mt
mt0Available 02-08-00-1,0  Tivoli Storage Manager Tape Drive
mt1Available 02-08-00-2,0  Tivoli Storage Manager Tape Drive
mt2Available 02-08-00-3,0  Tivoli Storage Manager Tape Drive
mt3Available 02-08-01-4,0  Tivoli Storage Manager Tape Drive
mt4Available 02-08-01-5,0  Tivoli Storage Manager Tape Drive
mt5Available 02-08-01-6,0  Tivoli Storage Manager Tape Drive
rmt0   Available 00-09-00-0,0  IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive
rmt1   Available 02-08-00-1,0  Other SCSI Tape Drive
rmt2   Available 02-08-00-2,0  Other SCSI Tape Drive
rmt3   Available 02-08-00-3,0  Other SCSI Tape Drive
rmt4   Available 02-08-01-4,0  Other SCSI Tape Drive
rmt5   Available 02-08-01-5,0  Other SCSI Tape Drive
rmt6   Available 02-08-01-6,0  Other SCSI Tape Drive
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/$ errpt | head
IDENTIFIER TIMESTAMP  T C RESOURCE_NAME  DESCRIPTION
5680E405   0721004607 P H mt5STORAGE SUBSYSTEM FAILURE
5680E405   0720193407 P H mt0STORAGE SUBSYSTEM FAILURE
5680E405   0717162007 P H mt0STORAGE SUBSYSTEM FAILURE
5680E405   0717144007 P H mt0STORAGE SUBSYSTEM FAILURE
5680E405   0716104507 P H mt0STORAGE SUBSYSTEM FAILURE
5680E405   0715114807 P H mt1STORAGE SUBSYSTEM FAILURE
4865FA9B   0714195507 P H rmt0   TAPE OPERATION ERROR
DE9A52D1   0714195507 I S rmt0   DEVICE DUMP RETRIEVED
0BA49C99   0714161107 T H scsi2  SCSI BUS ERROR
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/$
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/$ errpt -aj 5680E405 | more
---
LABEL:  ADSM_DD_LOG2
IDENTIFIER: 5680E405

Date/Time:   Sat Jul 21 00:46:53 PDT 2007
Sequence Number: 106
Machine Id:  00CB5C1E4C00
Node Id: bs-ip51a-23-030
Class:   H
Type:PERM
Resource Name:   mt5
Resource Class:  adsmtape
Resource Type:   ADSM-SCSI-MT
Location:U788C.001.AAA9117-P1-C13-C1-T2-L6-L0

Description
STORAGE SUBSYSTEM FAILURE

Probable Causes
ATTACHED SCSI TARGET DEVICE
SCSI ADAPTER

Failure Causes
ATTACHED SCSI TARGET DEVICE
SCSI ADAPTER

   Recommended Actions
   RUN DIAGNOSTICS AGAINST THE FAILING DEVICE
   CHECK PHYSICAL INSTALLATION
   CHECK FOR CORRECT MICROCODE FIX
   CONTACT APPROPRIATE SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE

Detail Data
COMMAND
0606  0800 007F F800   
STATUS CODE
 
SENSE DATA
0102  F000 0300 007F F81E   1100  009D     
               
               
               
ERROR CODE
  0
RETURN CODE
  0
REFERENCE CODE
               
               
    


Re: Slow TSM DB Performance?

2007-06-24 Thread Gerald

I don't think it's thrashing.. no pi's or po's really..2GB of ram in
the system. dual power4 processors. Internal storage is 150GB SCSI
drives. I believe 10k RPM.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/$ vmstat 5
System Configuration: lcpu=2 mem=2048MB
kthr memory page  faultscpu
- ---   ---
r  b   avm   fre  re  pi  po  fr   sr  cy  in   sy  cs us sy id wa
1  1 146332 81564   0   0   0 2329 2861   0 1737 4893 6316  8 11 74  8
1  0 146337 56087   0   0   0   00   0 2901 7624 8580 11 22 47 19
0  0 146337 56087   0   0   0   00   0 592 2402 1541  0  1 50 48
0  0 146337 56087   0   0   0   00   0 584 2273 1457  0  1 50 49

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/$ oslevel -r
5200-09


On 6/24/07, Bob Booth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On Sun, Jun 24, 2007 at 11:31:50AM -0700, Gerald wrote:
> Ultimately i'm trying to run an import on 23 LTO tapes which is going
> too slow and i'm trying to determine why. When it first started for
> the first 16 tapes or so, I was seeing 30MB/sec+ import speed. On
> Friday I noticed a lot of I/O activity on hdisk0 which is where the
> TSM DB is located and thought maybe i could achieve higher import
> speeds if I striped that JFS2 file system across both the internal
> hdisks. Thats where my troubles began..
>
> I managed to arrange this through a series of AIX commands creating a
> new striped fs and creating/deleting dbv's but when done, performance
> was worse. I put it back to how it was and performance has not
> recovered. I now tried putting the DB on a raw partition and still
> performance isn't any better.
>
> I'm not sure where to go from here. hdisk0 where the raw partition is
> located is still pegged (see below). A q stgpool takes quite a while
> to come back and ultimately i'm importing at a rate of about 6MB/sec
> now.
>
> The bad news is i'm on tape 17 of 23. Tapes were taking about 7 hours
> to import at 30MB/sec and i suspect we're now importing at a rate of
> 1/5 of that so lets call it 28 hours per tape. If true, the remaining
> tapes will take 7+ more days to import.
>
> My one idea is i could dump and load the DB to reorg it (perhaps thats
> causing the slowness?) but that would involve halting the import and
> starting it over - something that would also cost me 3-4 days or so.
> So it may be worth it but I don't even know if that's the root of the
> problem.
>
> Anyone have any ideas/suggestions?

what type of machine?  How many CPU's, how much memory.

OSlevel?  ML?

What about disk controllers, what type of disk is hdisk0?

Is your Log and DB on the same disk?

One thing I would do, is install 'nmon'.  Check to see if you are thrashing.

Are you seeing any disk errors?

Just some thoughts.

hth,

bob




--
-Gerald


Slow TSM DB Performance?

2007-06-24 Thread Gerald

Ultimately i'm trying to run an import on 23 LTO tapes which is going
too slow and i'm trying to determine why. When it first started for
the first 16 tapes or so, I was seeing 30MB/sec+ import speed. On
Friday I noticed a lot of I/O activity on hdisk0 which is where the
TSM DB is located and thought maybe i could achieve higher import
speeds if I striped that JFS2 file system across both the internal
hdisks. Thats where my troubles began..

I managed to arrange this through a series of AIX commands creating a
new striped fs and creating/deleting dbv's but when done, performance
was worse. I put it back to how it was and performance has not
recovered. I now tried putting the DB on a raw partition and still
performance isn't any better.

I'm not sure where to go from here. hdisk0 where the raw partition is
located is still pegged (see below). A q stgpool takes quite a while
to come back and ultimately i'm importing at a rate of about 6MB/sec
now.

The bad news is i'm on tape 17 of 23. Tapes were taking about 7 hours
to import at 30MB/sec and i suspect we're now importing at a rate of
1/5 of that so lets call it 28 hours per tape. If true, the remaining
tapes will take 7+ more days to import.

My one idea is i could dump and load the DB to reorg it (perhaps thats
causing the slowness?) but that would involve halting the import and
starting it over - something that would also cost me 3-4 days or so.
So it may be worth it but I don't even know if that's the root of the
problem.

Anyone have any ideas/suggestions?

Oh, this server has no data on it and does not do any
backups/restores. It was deployed soly for importing this set of
tapes.

tty:  tin tout   avg-cpu:  % user% sys % idle% iowait
 0.0 41.7   0.5  0.6   50.0  49.0

Disks:% tm_act Kbps  tpsKb_read   Kb_wrtn
hdisk0  98.9 978.0 244.5   9780 0
hdisk1   0.0   0.0   0.0  0 0
cd0  0.0   0.0   0.0  0 0


Re: Script to display DR Tape Usage

2007-05-02 Thread Gerald Michalak
You can get the list of tapes with

q drm copy=

and the list of tapes used by a given node by ( not quite what you asked
for )

q nodedata  stg=


and build a script around these commands.


Gerald Michalak
TSM - Certified V5 Administrator



"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 05/02/2007
06:57:11 AM:

> Hi All,
>
> I am looking for guidance on creating a script to show me the contents,
> Storagepool, and nodes per DR Tape that ejects each day.
>
> Q drmedia is fine to tell me what tapes, but I would like to see what
> tapes belong to what Storage pool when sent offsite, as I send them
> offsite for a month, week, year etc depending on my storage pool. i.e My
> 30, 90, 365, 2555 days retention periods tie up the my WEEKLY, TAPEPOOL,
> MONTHPOOL, YEARPOOL.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Thanks
> Adrian Compton


large files not restoring..

2007-02-07 Thread Gerald

I setup a new AIX 5.3 server and created a JFS2 file system of
substantial size. However, when I restore a directory of Notes NSF
files (TSM archive of a UNIX directory of NSF files), some files are
failing to restore with the message "file over user or system size
limit". I'm not sure what's causing this.

I suspect it's something incorrect in the file system creation? I
don't think there are any user quotas by default when you install AIX
5.3. Appreciate any help i'm sure i'm missing something silly.


Re: DB Recovery Problem

2007-02-06 Thread Gerald

Perfect! Thank-you that worked.. Interesting the comments are
required. I tried it without and dsmserv griped that it didn't
recognize the LIBRARYINVENTORY command.

On 2/6/07, Sean English <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

For the TS3500 (formally 3584) you have to put the following line in your
devconfig file so that TSM knows which slot the volume is in:


/* LIBRARYINVENTORY SCSI LIBRARYNAME VOLUMENAME SLOT# 101*/

Example:

/* LIBRARYINVENTORY SCSI LIBRARY01 SA 1185 101*/


If you already have this line in your devconfig, it could be that the slot
number in the above line is incorrect.



Thanks,

Sean English
Dist. Backup Tech Support








Gerald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 
02/05/2007 11:18 PM

Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 


To
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc

Subject
[ADSM-L] DB Recovery Problem






When doing a "./dsmserv restore db devc=ts1120 vol=MA0001 commit=yes"
I get the following error which seems as though TSM can't locate the
cartridge even though it's in the library.. I've even tried manually
putting it in the drive and kicking off the restore db command but it
simply ejects the cartridge and returns it to slot 1025 and still
errors with the following.. I have tried both "MA0001" and "MA0001JA"
but neither does it..

Any thoughts on whats wrong? I'm running out of ideas..

Tivoli Storage Manager for AIX-RS/6000
Version 5, Release 3, Level 4.0

Licensed Materials - Property of IBM

(C) Copyright IBM Corporation 1990, 2006.
All rights reserved.
U.S. Government Users Restricted Rights - Use, duplication or disclosure
restricted by GSA ADP Schedule Contract with IBM Corporation.

ANR0900I Processing options file dsmserv.opt.
ANR4726I The ICC support module has been loaded.
ANR8200I TCP/IP driver ready for connection with clients on port 1500.
ANR0200I Recovery log assigned capacity is 5120 megabytes.
ANR0201I Database assigned capacity is 102400 megabytes.
ANR4621I Database backup device class TS1120.
ANR4622I   Volume 1: MA0001.
ANR4630I Starting point-in-time database restore (commit).
ANR0300I Recovery log format started; assigned capacity 5120 megabytes.
ANR8312E Volume MA0001 could not be located in library TS3500.
ANR1402W Mount request denied for volume MA0001 - volume unavailable.
ANRD Mutex acquisition failure, errno=22; thread 1 (tid 0).
ANR7838S Server operation terminated.
  0x000100010538 pkAbort
  0x0001d4b4 TrapSyncError
  0x0001dec0 pkAcquireMutex
  0x0001006b0648 IcCopyEnd
  0x0001002d0920 IcRestoreDbData
  0x0001002cd37c icRestoreOneImageCopy
  0x0001007020dc AdmRestoreDb
  0x00010021847c admRestoreDatabase
  0x00015090 RestoreDb
  0x00012eb0 main
ANR7833S Server thread 1 terminated in response to program abort.
ANR7833S Server thread 2 terminated in response to program abort.
ANR7833S Server thread 3 terminated in response to program abort.
ANR7833S Server thread 4 terminated in response to program abort.
ANR7833S Server thread 5 terminated in response to program abort.
ANR7833S Server thread 6 terminated in response to program abort.
ANR7833S Server thread 7 terminated in response to program abort.
ANR7833S Server thread 8 terminated in response to program abort.
ANR7833S Server thread 9 terminated in response to program abort.
ANR7833S Server thread 10 terminated in response to program abort.
ANR7833S Server thread 11 terminated in response to program abort.
IOT/Abort trap (core dumped)

devconfig file (WWN and SERIAL #'s edited)..

DEFINE DEVCLASS TS1120 DEVTYPE=3592 FORMAT=DRIVE MOUNTLIMIT=DRIVES
MOUNTWAIT=60 MOUNTRETENTION=60 PREFIX=ADSM LIBRARY=TS3500 D
RIVEENCRYPTION=ALLOW SCALECAPACITY=100
SET SERVERNAME TSM
DEFINE LIBRARY TS3500 LIBTYPE=SCSI WWN="" SERIAL="-" SHARED=NO
AUTOLABEL=NO RESETDRIVE=NO
DEFINE PATH TSM TS3500 SRCTYPE=SERVER DESTTYPE=LIBRARY
DEVICE=/dev/smc0 ONLINE=YES
DEFINE DRIVE TS3500 DRIVE0 ELEMENT=257 ONLINE=Yes WWN="" SERIAL=""
DEFINE PATH TSM DRIVE0 SRCTYPE=SERVER DESTTYPE=DRIVE LIBRARY=TS3500
DEVICE=/dev/rmt0 ONLINE=YES

as you can see via tapeutil it's in a slot:

Slot Address 1025
  Slot State . Normal
  ASC/ASCQ ... 
  Media Present .. Yes
  Robot Access Allowed ... Yes
  Source Element Address Valid ... No
  Media Inverted . No
  Volume Tag . MA0001JA

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/tivoli/tsm/server/bin$ lslpp -L | grep Atape
  Atape.driver  10.3.9.0C FIBM AIX Enhanced Tape
and
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/tivoli/tsm/server/bin$ lsdev -Cc tape
rmt0 Available 1H-08-01 IBM 3592 Tape Drive (FCP)
rmt1 Available 1H-08-01 IBM 3592 Tape Drive (FCP)
rmt2 Available 1H-08-01 IBM 3592 Tape Drive (FCP)
smc0 Available 1H-08-01 IBM 3584 Library Medium Changer (FCP)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/tivoli/

DB Recovery Problem

2007-02-05 Thread Gerald

When doing a "./dsmserv restore db devc=ts1120 vol=MA0001 commit=yes"
I get the following error which seems as though TSM can't locate the
cartridge even though it's in the library.. I've even tried manually
putting it in the drive and kicking off the restore db command but it
simply ejects the cartridge and returns it to slot 1025 and still
errors with the following.. I have tried both "MA0001" and "MA0001JA"
but neither does it..

Any thoughts on whats wrong? I'm running out of ideas..

Tivoli Storage Manager for AIX-RS/6000
Version 5, Release 3, Level 4.0

Licensed Materials - Property of IBM

(C) Copyright IBM Corporation 1990, 2006.
All rights reserved.
U.S. Government Users Restricted Rights - Use, duplication or disclosure
restricted by GSA ADP Schedule Contract with IBM Corporation.

ANR0900I Processing options file dsmserv.opt.
ANR4726I The ICC support module has been loaded.
ANR8200I TCP/IP driver ready for connection with clients on port 1500.
ANR0200I Recovery log assigned capacity is 5120 megabytes.
ANR0201I Database assigned capacity is 102400 megabytes.
ANR4621I Database backup device class TS1120.
ANR4622I   Volume 1: MA0001.
ANR4630I Starting point-in-time database restore (commit).
ANR0300I Recovery log format started; assigned capacity 5120 megabytes.
ANR8312E Volume MA0001 could not be located in library TS3500.
ANR1402W Mount request denied for volume MA0001 - volume unavailable.
ANRD Mutex acquisition failure, errno=22; thread 1 (tid 0).
ANR7838S Server operation terminated.
 0x000100010538 pkAbort
 0x0001d4b4 TrapSyncError
 0x0001dec0 pkAcquireMutex
 0x0001006b0648 IcCopyEnd
 0x0001002d0920 IcRestoreDbData
 0x0001002cd37c icRestoreOneImageCopy
 0x0001007020dc AdmRestoreDb
 0x00010021847c admRestoreDatabase
 0x00015090 RestoreDb
 0x00012eb0 main
ANR7833S Server thread 1 terminated in response to program abort.
ANR7833S Server thread 2 terminated in response to program abort.
ANR7833S Server thread 3 terminated in response to program abort.
ANR7833S Server thread 4 terminated in response to program abort.
ANR7833S Server thread 5 terminated in response to program abort.
ANR7833S Server thread 6 terminated in response to program abort.
ANR7833S Server thread 7 terminated in response to program abort.
ANR7833S Server thread 8 terminated in response to program abort.
ANR7833S Server thread 9 terminated in response to program abort.
ANR7833S Server thread 10 terminated in response to program abort.
ANR7833S Server thread 11 terminated in response to program abort.
IOT/Abort trap (core dumped)

devconfig file (WWN and SERIAL #'s edited)..

DEFINE DEVCLASS TS1120 DEVTYPE=3592 FORMAT=DRIVE MOUNTLIMIT=DRIVES
MOUNTWAIT=60 MOUNTRETENTION=60 PREFIX=ADSM LIBRARY=TS3500 D
RIVEENCRYPTION=ALLOW SCALECAPACITY=100
SET SERVERNAME TSM
DEFINE LIBRARY TS3500 LIBTYPE=SCSI WWN="" SERIAL="-" SHARED=NO
AUTOLABEL=NO RESETDRIVE=NO
DEFINE PATH TSM TS3500 SRCTYPE=SERVER DESTTYPE=LIBRARY
DEVICE=/dev/smc0 ONLINE=YES
DEFINE DRIVE TS3500 DRIVE0 ELEMENT=257 ONLINE=Yes WWN="" SERIAL=""
DEFINE PATH TSM DRIVE0 SRCTYPE=SERVER DESTTYPE=DRIVE LIBRARY=TS3500
DEVICE=/dev/rmt0 ONLINE=YES

as you can see via tapeutil it's in a slot:

Slot Address 1025
 Slot State . Normal
 ASC/ASCQ ... 
 Media Present .. Yes
 Robot Access Allowed ... Yes
 Source Element Address Valid ... No
 Media Inverted . No
 Volume Tag . MA0001JA

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/tivoli/tsm/server/bin$ lslpp -L | grep Atape
 Atape.driver  10.3.9.0C FIBM AIX Enhanced Tape and
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/tivoli/tsm/server/bin$ lsdev -Cc tape
rmt0 Available 1H-08-01 IBM 3592 Tape Drive (FCP)
rmt1 Available 1H-08-01 IBM 3592 Tape Drive (FCP)
rmt2 Available 1H-08-01 IBM 3592 Tape Drive (FCP)
smc0 Available 1H-08-01 IBM 3584 Library Medium Changer (FCP)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/tivoli/tsm/server/bin$ lsdev -C | grep scsi
fscsi0 Available 1H-08-01  FC SCSI I/O Controller Protocol Device
fscsi1 Available 1V-08-01  FC SCSI I/O Controller Protocol Device


Microsoft Virtual Servers

2007-01-10 Thread Gerald Michalak
Ladies and Gentlemen,

I'm looking for a good method to backup the host system and virtual servers
on a system running Microsoft Windows 2003 server hosting about 6 virtual
servers.

1) I guess I can install a TSM client on each virtual server and on the
host use the exclude command to skip their HD files.

2) I would prefer to only backup the host system using Open File Support.
Does it work in this environment?

3) Are there any other options I'm not dreaming of ?

Thanks for any and all responses.


Gerald Michalak
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RoadMap?

2007-01-03 Thread Gerald

Is there a TSM roadmap posted someplace? Having trouble finding it..
i.e. whats the next version, when is it coming out, what features will
it have?

Thanks!


Re: OFF CONTENT - Are my messages getting through?

2006-11-01 Thread Gerald Michalak
Yes.



"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 10/31/2006
09:03:37 PM:

> Just trying to find if my email is getting through to thr group
>
> Thanks!
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Which copy to restore?

2006-10-23 Thread Gerald Michalak
We just finished a DR drill and ran into an interesting issue.

We are running TSM V5.2 on AIX 5.2.

The primary TSM server is creating 2 copies of  data in copy storage pools.
One copy is on tape and going to offsite storage, the other copy is being
stored on another TSM server in another office 30 miles away.  I am using
the backup storage pool command to send the data to the 2nd site.

During the drill, we restored the primary server at an out of state site.
But we still had network access to the rest of the corporate network back
home including the 2nd copy of the data. During the client restores the
recovered TSM server repeatedly tried to restore from the 2nd site instead
of using the recalled tapes in the local library. The restores were PIT
restores and when I made the 2nd site volumes unavailable the data was
recovered from the tapes.

So, how does the TSM server decide which copy of data to restore when there
are 2 copies???


Gerald Michalak
TSM - Certified V5 Administrator

Highest session number

2006-10-10 Thread Gerald Michalak
I've had a TSM server running for a while, the last session number I saw
was:

1,385,881

What's the highest this will go before crashing the server?


Gerald Michalak
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


How to determine primary pool volumes required for a copy pool volume?

2006-09-15 Thread Gerald

The scenario is I have a copy pool tape that was accidently damaged. I
would like to know which primary pool tapes I would need to recreate
this copypool tape. The first obvious way is to run a backup stgpool
preview=yes command however that will ALSO show other volumes out of
sync and doesn't really give me the mapping directly to the 1 volume.

Is there a select query I can run where the input is the copypool
volume and it returns the primary pool volumes? I am pretty sure I
used to have this query and can't located it now that I need it.

Appreciate the help!


Re: TSM Database Reorg

2006-08-31 Thread Gerald

Actually I believe it's so in the event of a system crash, the
contents of memory can be dumped to swap space for debug/analysis.

On 8/31/06, Terry McColgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Actually, the "paging space needs to be 2 times as large as your RAM"-argument 
was to get PhotoShop to run. This was seven years ago but it worked.

Terry McColgan


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Jurjen Oskam
Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 2:46 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: TSM Database Reorg


On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 03:32:44PM -0500, Whitlock, Brett wrote:

[TSM database reorganization]
> recommended.  Problem is there is another dba up there, who has some TSM
> experience, who says she used to do it painlessly.  Anyone want to weigh
> in?

Again: *why* did the DBA reorg the database? The fact she used to do it
frequently is not really relevant. In our case, I could run EXPIRE
INVENTORY three times a day rather painlessly, but that doesn't make it
*useful*.

As someone once said: "Profile, don't speculate."


(It's starting to remind me of the "paging space needs to be 2 times as
large as your RAM"-argument. You hear it all the time, and when someone
asks why, all you get is: "eeehm, because everybody does it")
--
Jurjen Oskam




--
-Gerald


Re: Problem deleting disk pool volume.

2006-08-29 Thread Gerald Michalak
With disk volumes I usually have to vary the volume offline first.

Syntax


.-Wait--=--No--.
>>-VARy--+-ONline--+--volume_name--+--+><
 '-OFfline-'
'-Wait--=--+-No--+-'
'-Yes-'

Gerald Michalak
TSM - Certified V5 Administrator



"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 08/28/2006
02:19:22 PM:

> Well maybe this method will work.
>
> Larry McNutt
> The Timken Company
>
>
>
> -
> This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or
> entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please
> do not forward, copy, print, use or disclose this communication to
> others; also please notify the sender by replying to this message,
> and then delete it from your system. The Timken Company / The
> Timken Corporation
>
> - Message from "Mcnutt, Larry E." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on
> Mon, 28 Aug 2006 13:32:26 -0400 -
>
> To:
>
> "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 
>
> Subject:
>
> Problem deleting disk pool volume.
>
> TSM Server 5.3.3.0
> AIX 5.3 ML4
>
> Hello list,
>
> I have a disk pool volume that I cannot seem to delete.  I have used
> "move data" to empty the volume, but when I try a "delete volume", it
> says the volume contains data.  However, "audit volume fix=yes" says
> there is no data in the volume.  Any help is appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
> Larry McNutt
> The Timken Company
>
>
> tsm: FSPHTSM2>q vol stg=workstn
>
>
>
> Volume Name   Storage  Device  EstimatedPct
> Volume
>   Pool NameClass Name   Capacity   Util
> Status
>   ---  --  -  -
> 
> /tsm1stg1/tsm2disk03.dsm  WORKSTN  DISK 25,600.00.5
> On-Line
> /tsm1stg2/tsm2disk02.dsm  WORKSTN  DISK 25,600.06.4
> On-Line
> /tsm1stg2/tsm2disk05.dsm  WORKSTN  DISK 25,000.05.5
> On-Line
> /tsm1stg3/tsm2disk05.dsm  WORKSTN  DISK 12,500.06.7
> On-Line
> /tsm1stg4/tsm2disk05.dsm  WORKSTN  DISK 12,500.0   16.1
> On-Line
> /tsm2stg1/tsm2disk03.dsm  WORKSTN  DISK 10,240.01.9
> On-Line
> /tsm2stg2/tsm2disk03.dsm  WORKSTN  DISK 10,240.00.7
> On-Line
> /tsm5stg1/tsm2disk03.dsm  WORKSTN  DISK 50,000.01.8
> On-Line
> /tsmstg2/disk01.dsm   WORKSTN  DISK 50,000.0   -1.1
> On-Line <= This is the volume
>
>
> tsm: FSPHTSM2>q vol /tsmstg2/disk01.dsm f=d
>
>Volume Name: /tsmstg2/disk01.dsm
>  Storage Pool Name: WORKSTN
>  Device Class Name: DISK
> Estimated Capacity: 50,000.0
>Scaled Capacity Applied:
>   Pct Util: -1.1
>  Volume Status: On-Line
> Access: Read-Only
> Pct. Reclaimable Space:
>Scratch Volume?:
>In Error State?:
>   Number of Writable Sides:
>Number of Times Mounted:
>  Write Pass Number:
>  Approx. Date Last Written:
> Approx. Date Last Read:
>Date Became Pending:
> Number of Write Errors:
>  Number of Read Errors:
>Volume Location:
> Volume is MVS Lanfree Capable :
> Last Update by (administrator): MCNUTT
>  Last Update Date/Time: 08/22/06   17:31:36
>   Begin Reclaim Period:
> End Reclaim Period:
>
> tsm: FSPHTSM2>audit volume /tsmstg2/disk01.dsm fix=yes
>
> ANR2311W This command will discard any inventory references to volume
>
> /tsmstg2/disk01.dsm associated with missing or inconsistent stored data,
>
> thereby rendering the data unrecoverable; the valid data on the volume
> will be
> inaccessible to users until the operation completes.
>
>
>
> Do you wish to proceed? (Yes (Y)/No (N)) y
>
> ANR2209W Volume /tsmstg2/disk01.dsm contains no data.
>
>
>
>
> ANR2017I Administrator MCNUTT issued command: AUDIT VOLUME
> /tsmstg2/disk01.dsm
> fix=yes
> ANR2311W This command will discard any inventory references to volume
> /tsmstg2/disk01.dsm associated with missing or inconsistent stored data,
> thereby rendering the data unrecoverable; the valid data on the volume
> will be
> inaccessible to users until the operation completes.
> ANR2017I Administrator MCNUTT issued command: AUDIT VOLUME
> /tsmstg2/disk01.dsm
> fix=yes
> ANRD dsaudit.c(1097): ThreadId<80> Erroneous information for volume
> /tsmstg2/disk01.dsm was removed from the

Re: Detect whether L700 tape library unavailable

2006-08-17 Thread Gerald Michalak
The L700 does have an optional "personality" module which allows the
library to be connected to the network. You can then open a browser to this
address and see the whole library, slots, drives, i/o ports, errors.

We have it on all our L700 libraries.

Also, I've created a Perl script which uses the lbtest command to get the
list of tapes in the i/o slots. ( see below )  It may not be pretty but it
works.


I use this list in scripts to checkin offsite tapes and load/label new
scratch tapes.



Gerald Michalak
TSM - Certified V5 Administrator

==


lib_cap_inv.pl
==
#!/usr/bin/perl
#   lib_cap_inv.pl
#

open (LIBV, "/usr/tivoli/tsm/devices/bin/lbtest -f lbtest.in -d /dev/lb0 -o
/tmp/lbinv.out |") || die(" * * * Library Busy  ");

close (LIBV);

`rm -f /adsm_restore/lib_cap_inv`;

open (INV,"/tmp/lbinv.out");
open (CAPINV,">>/adsm_restore/lib_cap_inv");

while ()
{
$line=$_;
chop($line);

($type,$dummy,$dummy,$dummy,$slot,$stat ) = split(" ",$line);

if ( $type eq "Import" and $stat eq "FULL)" )
{
$line=;
$line=;
$line=;
chop($line);
($dummy,$dummy,$f1,$f2,$f3 ) = split(" ",$line);
print CAPINV "$f1 \n";
print " slot=".$slot." f1=".$f1." f2=".$f2." f3=".$f3."\n"
;
}
}

close (INV);
close (CAPINV);

exit;

==

lbtest.in
==
command open $D
command return_elem_count
command return_lib_inventory_all
command close


Re: 3494 Library Sharing

2006-05-11 Thread Gerald Michalak
Just setup the Storage Agents as you normally would. The only exception is
that you create the paths on the TSM Library Manager. Then the TSM Library
Client will pass the mount requests to the Library Manager without any
special configuration.


Gerald Michalak
Certified TSM V5.3 Admin.


"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 05/11/2006
08:59:22 AM:

> I am trying to share a 3494 tape library between two TSM servers.  The
> TSM Library Manager server has storage agents defined to it but I would
> like to define storage agents on the TSM Library Client server.  With no
> drives defined on the TSM Library Client server is it possible to define
> storage agents and how would you do that?
>
>
>
> 
>
> Ellen Deschenes
>
> UITS Server Support
>
> 486-8341
>
>


Re: Loaded client/server question

2006-04-06 Thread Gerald Michalak
You might try backing up each mount point as a separate client. You'll need
several dsm.opt files with the proper include and clientname options.

We do this on some of our large Novell clusters treating each volume as a
distinct client.


Gerald Michalak
630-691-4819
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 04/06/2006
09:26:09 AM:

> You're right! Started out at v5.3.0 on Win 2003. Have upgraded to
> v5.3.2.2, v5.3.3, and downgraded back down to 5.3.0 to work through
> various issues (win error 1450, insufficient resources). Journaling may
> not be answer either, though I would love for it to be, because there is
> a high degree of file movement on this client (can you say buffer
> overflow?). And oh yes, it is taking its sweet time in file inspection.
> But there has to be way to handle this...
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Prather, Wanda
> Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 9:08 AM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Loaded client/server question
>
> You don't mention what client this is - but the newly released ones
> (5.3.3) support journaling for AIX as well as Windows.
> That might help with the incremental backup issue.  Could be a lot of
> the time is just in navigating the file tree.
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Bell, Charles (Chip)
> Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 5:26 PM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Loaded client/server question
>
>
> I've posed the sob story on here before, but I have a client that has 39
> NTFS mounts with millions of files on each. When backing this up on an
> incremental basis, it takes multiple days now. Also, the TSM database
> grows at a rapid rate, and I have PMRs open on both issues.
>
>
>
> Now...my question is should I have a separate TSM server serving this
> client or should I have 2 instances? I can't back up this client to the
> current TSM server because we can't continue to feed the Enterprise DB
> for this one client. I seriously need some suggestions and how-to's
> because I've never experienced client behavior such as this.  :-(
>
>
>
> Feel free to email me directly if you have any ideas...
>
>
>
> God bless you!!!
>
> Chip Bell
> Network Engineer I
> IBM Tivoli Certified Deployment Professional (ITSM 5.2)
> Baptist Health System
> Birmingham, AL
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -
> Confidentiality Notice:
> The information contained in this email message is privileged and
> confidential information and intended only for the use of the
> individual or entity named in the address. If you are not the
> intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
> distribution, or copying of this information is strictly
> prohibited. If you received this information in error, please
> notify the sender and delete this information from your computer
> and retain no copies of any of this information.


Import Node

2006-03-09 Thread Gerald
I've been given a large number of tapes to import that are TSM
exports. I notice the import process requires you to import them in
the order they were exported. The problem is I don't know what that
order is. I tried my first tape and it was sequence 4 when it wanted
sequence 1.

Apparently I need to figure out the order. Is there some way to do
this soley from the tapes?

I attempted to run an import command with preview=yes against each
tape since it gripes and tells me the sequence when it fails. I was
hoping it would become clear on what the order is. Unfortunately there
are multiple occurances of sequences.. more then one sequence 2, 3, 4,
etc.. So i'm not sure this strategy is paying off.

If anyone has done this before and has an easy way to identify what
import order to use please let me know.

Thanks!


Re: tsm

2006-02-22 Thread Gerald Michalak
Chances are it's not a TSM issue at this point but a network issue.

Usually speeds this slow on a GB infrastructure indicate that
"auto-negotiation" is not working. ( never does ).

Make sure all NIC's and switch ports are locked down to 1GB at full duplex.

Gerald Michalak
TSM - Certified V5 Administrator




"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 02/22/2006
01:15:04 PM:

> Hello,
>
> First of all, I know almost nothing about Tivoli so bear with me :)
> Now, do you have any idea what's the maximum throughput between a TSM
client
> and server, during a backup? Let's assume that we have a GB
infrastructure
> connecting them. I'm experiencing really low speeds (3-4MBps) and
> unfortunately it's impossible to try some other kind of data transfer
(via
> ftp for ex.) between the same peers.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Octavian


Re: LIBRARY MANAGER

2006-02-08 Thread Gerald Michalak
I don't see a problem with this. I have 4 TSM servers and 7 storage agents
for LAN-Free backups sharing 30 drives.

I have 1 instance of TSM running as a library manager only, no clients. The
'q path' command runs for pages and pages.

My library is an STK Powderhorn silo with an ACSLS controller.


Jerry Michalak
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TSM certified administrator


"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 02/07/2006
04:50:35 PM:

> Hello All,
>
>
>
>   I have a question.  I have two aix servers(5.2) running Tivoli 5.2.3.5
> and between them I am using library management.  I would like to setup a
> third server running windows, and put it into this scenario.  Is this a
> possibility?
>
>
>
> Thank you in Advance
>
>
>
> James
>
>
>
>


Re: query libv confusion

2006-01-26 Thread Gerald Michalak
You will need to do 2 audits, 1 within the ACSLS software and 1 from TSM.

The rule of thumb I have is that the ACSLS audit will take about 5 seconds
per tape.

( 12 tapes per minute,  800 / 12 = 66.67 minutes ) just over an hour.

Then the TSM audit library should simply exchange data with the ACSLS
server, a few minutes I would guess.


Gerald Michalak
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 01/26/2006
12:48:31 PM:

> Thanks Wanda!
>
> BTWHow long do you think it would take to audit the library (through
> TSM)
> It has 800 tapes
> It is an ACSLS StorageTek library. 9840C
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> Dave Zarnoch
> Nationwide Provident
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>   "Prather, Wanda"
>   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]To:
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
>   UAPL.EDU>cc:
>   Sent by: "ADSM:  Subject:  Re: [ADSM-
> L] query libv confusion
>   Dist Stor
>   Manager"
>   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   .EDU>
>
>
>   01/26/2006 12:56
>   PM
>   Please respond to
>   "ADSM: Dist Stor
>   Manager"
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yep.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Dave Zarnoch
> Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 12:54 PM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: query libv confusion
>
>
> I have some tapes that show up when I do a "q libv" as "private"
>
> However. they are not physically present in the silo and
> show up  as "full offsite Vault" when I do a "q vol"
> I have also confirmed that they are off-site.
>
> Can I just do a "checkout libv   checkl=no rem=no?
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
>
> Dave Zarnoch
> Nationwide Provident
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> W 302-452-4197
> C  302-462-8703


Re: acsls library client query path etc ...

2006-01-18 Thread Gerald Michalak
I'm have a similar setup and it's true, the library client has no paths and
no drives. So, q libv won't work either, only the library manager sees
these volumes.


Gerald Michalak
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 01/18/2006
02:12:42 PM:

> Just trying out library sharing, following documentation in the admin
guide
>
> Configuring ACSLS-Managed Libraries
> http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/tivihelp/v1r1/index.jsp?
> topic=/com.ibm.itsmaixn.doc/anragd53147.htm
>
> Apparently working fine, as library client mounts/reads/writes tapes as
> expected. My question: is it expected behavior that 'query path' info is
> not available from the library client? For test purposes we've shared
> three drives here:
>
> from library manager server ADSM:
>
> tsm: ADSM>query path
> Source Name Source Type Destination Destination On-Line
> NameType
> --- --- --- --- ---
> ADSMSERVER  A1F0MT04DRIVE   Yes
> ADSMSERVER  A1F0MT05DRIVE   Yes
> ADSMSERVER  A1F1MT09DRIVE   Yes
> ADSMSERVER  A0F0MT00DRIVE   Yes
> ADSMSERVER  A0F0MT01DRIVE   Yes
> ADSMSERVER  A0F0MT02DRIVE   Yes
> ADSMSERVER  A0F0MT03DRIVE   Yes
> ADSMSERVER  A0F1MT06DRIVE   Yes
> ADSMSERVER  A0F1MT07DRIVE   Yes
> ADSMSERVER  A0F1MT08DRIVE   Yes
> TSM SERVER  A1F0MT04DRIVE   Yes
> TSM SERVER  A1F0MT05DRIVE   Yes
> TSM SERVER  A1F1MT09DRIVE   Yes
>
> from library client server TSM:
>
> tsm: TSM>query path
> ANR2034E QUERY PATH: No match found using this criteria.
> ANS8001I Return code 11.
>
> thanks,
> -Robert


Re: 3590 Drive Problem

2005-11-30 Thread Gerald
Bingo!

I thought i'd checked all the ends but when I went to remove the short
cable daisy-chaining the one good drive to the one bad drive, I found
a bent pin on the end of the cable I had not previously checked. I was
removing it because the first device was working in the chain and the
second was not. Perhaps the cable itself was bad I thought. Turns out
it was just a bent pin..

Gerald

On 11/29/05, Bob Booth - UIUC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 05:27:10PM -0800, Gerald wrote:
> > I have a drive that from AIX lists as available. In TSM when i try to
> >
> > define a path to the drive I get an "ANR8420E DEFINE PATH: An I/O
> >
> > error occured while accessing drive DRIVE1." and a "ANS8001I Return
> >
> > code 15.". Then below is what appears in the AIX error report.
>
> Has this drive ever worked?  If it has been de-cabled, or the lead drive
> has been removed, check the cables again.  Make very sure that NONE of the
> pins are crossed over.  If any of the ground lines are crossed, or not
> making contact, the drive may register (become available), but you won't be
> able to do anything with it.  Check the terminators as well, and any place
> where the cable may have been disconnected.  Those cables are very easy to
> bend pins on!
>
> If it was functioning and quit, and has not been disconnected, you may have
> a problem in the interface card pack on the drive.  Also make sure that
> the interface you are connected to on the drive says it is online on the
> front panel.  You can also rmdev the drive and do a mkdev on it to see if
> it comes back.
>
> If all else fails, have your CE run a SCSI wrap test after running card
> diags on the drive.
>
> just some thoughts.
>
> bob
>


--
-Gerald


3590 Drive Problem

2005-11-29 Thread Gerald
I have a drive that from AIX lists as available. In TSM when i try to
define a path to the drive I get an "ANR8420E DEFINE PATH: An I/O
error occured while accessing drive DRIVE1." and a "ANS8001I Return
code 15.". Then below is what appears in the AIX error report.

I've doublechecked that the cabling and terminator looks ok and it
does. There is another 3590-H drive daisy-chained to this problem one
that is operating properly. The problem drive has been power cycled
and comes up fine (3590-H drive) but the described problem is still
repeatable.

Appreciate any ideas on how to proceed to troubleshoot this problem.
I'm thinking a service call for the drive is next..?

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/tivoli/tsm/server/bin$ errpt IDENTIFIER
TIMESTAMP  T C RESOURCE_NAME  DESCRIPTION
5537AC5F   1129170905 P H rmt1   TAPE DRIVE FAILURE
0BA49C99   1129170905 T H scsi3  SCSI BUS ERROR
5537AC5F   1129170805 P H rmt1   TAPE DRIVE FAILURE
0BA49C99   1129170805 T H scsi3  SCSI BUS ERROR
5537AC5F   1129170805 P H rmt1   TAPE DRIVE FAILURE
0BA49C99   1129170805 T H scsi3  SCSI BUS ERROR
5537AC5F   1129170805 P H rmt1   TAPE DRIVE FAILURE
0BA49C99   1129170805 T H scsi3  SCSI BUS ERROR
5537AC5F   1129170805 P H rmt1   TAPE DRIVE FAILURE
0BA49C99   1129170805 T H scsi3  SCSI BUS ERROR
5537AC5F   1129170805 P H rmt1   TAPE DRIVE FAILURE
0BA49C99   1129170805 T H scsi3  SCSI BUS ERROR
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/tivoli/tsm/server/bin$ errpt -aj 5537AC5F | more
---
LABEL:  TAPE_ERR4
IDENTIFIER: 5537AC5F

Date/Time:   Tue Nov 29 17:09:00 PST
Sequence Number: 51356
Machine Id:  000C057A4C00
Node Id: ps-bs-p610-01
Class:   H
Type:PERM
Resource Name:   rmt1
Resource Class:  tape
Resource Type:   3590
Location:P1-I4/Z1-A3
VPD:
ManufacturerIBM
Machine Type and Model..03590H1A
Serial Number...000D5111
Device Specific.(FW)F2C5
Loadable Microcode LevelA0B00E26

Description
TAPE DRIVE FAILURE

Probable Causes
ADAPTER
TAPE DRIVE

Failure Causes
ADAPTER
TAPE DRIVE

Recommended Actions
PERFORM PROBLEM DETERMINATION PROCEDURES

Detail Data
SENSE DATA
0A03  5A00 3F00  0004   0200 0200    
             
             
             
             
       
---


Re: Run out of scratch tapes

2005-11-29 Thread Gerald Michalak
You have a catch-22 here. You need at least 1 scratch tape to run
reclamation. If you don't have any, then you have to create one.

Find your least used tape and issue a "move data  stgpool=" to move the data to disk.

When that's done, delete the volume, " del vol  ", that should make
it a scratch tape.

Then set reclamation value on the tape pool to 90 or lower. "upd stg
 recl=90".


Gerald Michalak









"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 11/29/2005
06:57:29 AM:

> Hi, I´m new in TSM, I´ve 29 tapes and 2 drives, all of my tapes are
> in private state, some are in filling status and others in full, if
> I execute the sentence:
>
> select volume_name, pct_utilized, status, pct_reclaim from volumes
> where pct_utilized < 20
>
> I get
>
> VOLUME_NAMEPCT_UTILIZED STATUS
PCT_RECLAIM
> --  --
---
> DYI502  0.0 FILLING
0.0
> DYI508  4.7 FILLING
38.5
> DYI511 12.0 FILLING
33.0
> DYI513  9.1 FILLING
34.4
> DYI515  9.9 FILLING
26.7
> FZW939  6.7 FILLING
36.8
> FZW941  2.4 FULL
97.5
> FZW943  0.7 FULL
99.2
> FZW945 16.2 FULL
89.1
> FZW947 14.7 FULL
89.4
>
>  I need to make some space but the reclamation process didn´t free
> some space, I´ve executed move data command but one of the drives shows
>
> ANR8376I Mount point reserved in device class DC-SUNL1000, status:
RESERVED
>
> When I execute q mount command.
>
> How could I get some scratch tapes as soon as possible?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
> Marcelo.

Re: Log pinned, filled, almost crashed

2005-11-08 Thread Gerald Michalak
Here's the technote.

Problem Long-running sessions with poor throughput or hung sessions can
cause the recovery log to become pinned. This can ultimately result in the
TSM Server abending due to an over-committed recovery log.   Cause
Solution The THROUGHPUTDATATHRESHOLD and THROUGHPUTTIMETHRESHOLD options
were introduced to help prevent hung sessions or long-running sessions from
pinning the recovery log for any extended period of time. When the
THROUGHPUTDATATHRESHOLD and THROUGHPUTTIMETHRESHOLD options are specified
in the dsmserv.opt file, the TSM Server will check the status of a client
session after the session has been running for X amount of time, where X is
the time specified for the THROUGHPUTTIMETHRESHOLD. If the average
throughput for this session does not meet or exceed the value specified for
THROUGHPUTDATATHRESHOLD, then the session will be cancelled by the TSM
Server, thus preventing the recovery log from becoming over-committed.



"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 11/08/2005
11:47:45 AM:

> Have you looked into approaches suggested by IBM Technote 1084167?
>
>Richard Sims

Re: Missed schedules

2005-11-03 Thread Gerald Michalak
I would first check the number of available sessions on the server. You may
be running out of sessions and it's first come first served.


Gerald Michalak



"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 11/03/2005
08:19:00 AM:

> Hi Everybody,
>
> Has anyone ran into problems with missed scheduled ? I know that a
> few missed schedules a night may be normal, but we are getting
> several , more than 20,  a night . Most of the missed schedules are
> Oracle related backups  i.e. archives and hot backups missing their
> schedules . We have a paging system that pages us if a schedule is
> missed, Needless to say, it's been going off more than we would like
> to. Does anyone have any ideas on minimzing the missed schedules ?
> Unfortunately, it's not the case that is is the same 20 schedules
> being missed. It varies from night to night. Any input would be
> greatly appreciated.
>
> Rich


BA Client - Restoring with an exclusion list?

2005-10-27 Thread Gerald
I believe the answer is no, but can anyone think of a way to restore all
files of a particular extension by using a wildcard in conjunction with the
cmdline *except* certain files?

e.g. I want to restore all NSF (lotus notes database) files backed up on a
shares file system. Normally i'd specify something akin to "\...\*.nsf" but
I know certain NSF files i don't care about.. for instance, I don't want any
"names.nsf" files.

Is there any way to restore all NSF's except "names.nsf" and others if i had
a list of files i didn't want to restore?
--
-Gerald


Re: Audit Vol not working

2005-10-25 Thread Gerald Michalak
Do a "q libv" on this volume and verify it's in the correct slot. Or just
run an "audit libr  checkl=barcode" and see what happens.

The tape may not be in the correct slot or heaven forbid, on the floor of
the library.

Gerald Michalak
630-691-4819
pager 800-759-8352 # 1076423
AIX - Certified Support Technician


"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 10/24/2005
05:11:42 PM:

> Has anyone ever had a problem where a tape has been marked unavailable,
> will accept an update to readw or reado, but when attempting to mount
> generates errors and goes back to unav? I am doing some cleaning up with
> some of the tapes in the library (reado/unav tapes), and this one is a
> booger. Please help!
>
>
>
> Attempted 'audit vol a00328 fix=y'
>
>
>
> 10/24/05   16:36:37  ANR2312I Audit Volume (Repair) process started for
> volume A00328 (process ID 1806). (SESSION: 117836, PROCESS: 1806)
>
> 10/24/05   16:36:57  ANR8355E I/O error reading label for volume A00328
> in drive 3580_5 (/dev/rmt3). (SESSION: 117836, PROCESS: 1806)
>
> 10/24/05   16:37:16  ANR8381E LTO volume A00328 could not be mounted in
> drive 3580_5 (/dev/rmt3). (SESSION: 117836, PROCESS: 1806)
>
> 10/24/05   16:37:16  ANR1402W Mount request denied for volume A00328 -
> volume unavailable. (SESSION: 117836, PROCESS: 1806)
>
> 10/24/05   16:37:16  ANR1410W Access mode for volume A00328 now set to
> "unavailable". (SESSION: 117836, PROCESS: 1806)
>
> 10/24/05   16:37:16  ANR2321W Audit volume process terminated for volume
> A00328 - storage media inaccessible. (SESSION: 117836, PROCESS: 1806)
>
> 10/24/05   16:37:16  ANR0985I Process 1806 for AUDIT VOLUME (REPAIR)
> running in the BACKGROUND completed with completion state FAILURE at
> 16:37:16. (SESSION: 117836, PROCESS: 1806)
>
>
>
> Other notes, 3584 library, server AIX 5.1, TSM 5.3.1.2
>
> Also attempted move data to no avail
>
> God bless you!!!
>
> Chip Bell
> Network Engineer I
> IBM Tivoli Certified Deployment Professional (ITSM 5.2)
> Baptist Health Systems
> Birmingham, AL
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Confidentiality Notice:
> The information contained in this email message is privileged and
> confidential information and intended only for the use of the
> individual or entity named in the address.  If you are not the
> intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
> distribution, or copying of this information is strictly prohibited.
> If you received this information in error, please notify the sender
> and delete this information from your computer and retain no copies
> of any of this information.


Re: DR tapes not changing states

2005-10-19 Thread Gerald Michalak
I've seen this before with ACSLS, and TSM doesn't finish the move, and
change the status, until the tapes are removed from the CAP slots on the
library.



Gerald Michalak
630-691-4819
pager 800-759-8352 # 1076423
AIX - Certified Support Technician


"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 10/19/2005
09:13:23 AM:

> Folks,
>
> We are in the process of moving from a l700 StorageTek lib
> to a l8500 lib using ACSLS and doing some testing.
>
> When we issue the following command:
>
> MOVE DRMEDIA  * wherest=mo tost=va cmd=&VOL w=n rem=Untileefull cap=0,1,0
>
> The system responds:
>
> 10/19/05   05:50:37  ANR6696I MOVE DRMEDIA: CHECKOUT LIBVOLUME for volume
>   309069 in library 8500 starting. (SESSION: 1923,
> PROCESS:
>   41)
>
> The tape is ejected into the cap but the state stays as "MountableinLib"
> and doesn't change to vault
>
> Anyone see this before?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Dave Zarnoch
> Nationwide Provident
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> W 302-452-4197
> C  302-462-8703


Re: Include/exclude issue ?

2005-09-19 Thread Gerald Michalak
Here's what I use and it's working fine. I removed the exclude.dir that was
there. Client is Solaris 8 with TSM client 5.1.5.2.


EXCLUDE /oradata[1-9]/.../*
*
include /oradata9/backup1/.../*
include /oradata9/backup2/.../*


Gerald Michalak


"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 09/19/2005
01:38:13 PM:

> I need to exclude oradata files from the OS incremental backup
"exclude.dir
> /exlibris1/oradat*" where they lice but I need
> to backup (include some *.archive files in same path but in
subdirectories)
>
> I have included the archive path /exlibris2/oradata/aleph1/arch/ but it
> still thinks that they are excluded with the inclexcl statements I have
> listed below,
> Does any one see what would help us to exclude what we need to but
include
> what we need to backup in the sub-path ?
>
>
> INCLEXCL file
> exclude.dir /exlibris1/oradat*
> exclude.dir /exlibris2/oradat*
> include /exlibris2/oradata/aleph1/arch/
> exclude.dir /var/run
> exclude.dir /etc/mnttab
> exclude.dir /proc
> exclude.dir /backup
>
>
> I am not seeing something
> Thanks for any help.
>
> Justin


Re: Trouble initializing a new TSM Server

2005-09-12 Thread Gerald Michalak
You need to back to your TSM media and install the dsmserv.cat file.  Make
sure you pick the correct locale and that the environment pararmeter LANG
is set correctly.


Gerald Michalak
630-691-4819
pager 800-759-8352 # 1076423
AIX - Certified Support Technician


"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 09/11/2005
07:57:40 AM:

> Am trying to get my new tsm server on unix initialized and get this
> error message:  Never had a problem before with this.anyone seen
> this before??
> Aix 5.3.0
> TSM Server 5.2.4.0
>
>
>
> (C) Copyright IBM Corporation 1999,2003. All rights reserved.
> U.S. Government Users Restricted Rights - Use, duplication or disclosure
> restricted by GSA ADP Schedule Contract with IBM Corporation.
>
> ANR0900I Processing options file dsmserv.opt.
> ANRW Unable to open locale message catalog,
> /usr/lib/nls/msg/en_US/dsmserv.c
> at.
> ANR7811I Direct I/O will be used for all eligible disk files.
> ANR0990I Server restart-recovery in progress.
> ANR0212E Unable to read disk definition file dsmserv.dsk.


Re: Help - TSM Logs deleted

2005-09-01 Thread Gerald Michalak
Chances are the file   dsmserv.dsk is/was missing or was rebuilt. It's in
the server/bin directory, it's a text file, make sure it has the full path
to each log and db file.

Then start the TSM server.


Gerald Michalak
630-691-4819
pager 800-759-8352 # 1076423
AIX - Certified Support Technician


"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 09/01/2005
03:29:07 PM:

> I shut my TSM Server down in order to take a backup of it.
> When bringing it back up I noted that the log files had been deleted (jr
> sys admin)
> I recreated the log files with dsmfmt and dsmserv format and am now
> trying to get tsm to run again and it says no checkpoint information can
> be found. The Database files are all there and intact and log mode was
> not set to roll forward.
> Has anyone experienced this and what is the likeliness that I will have
> to restore my Database (backup DB) to get back up and running?
> TSM Server version 5.3.1.1
> OS AIX 5.1
> 
> This message is intended only for the use of the Addressee and
> may contain information that is PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL.
>
> If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
> that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited.
>
> If you have received this communication in error, please erase
> all copies of the message and its attachments and notify us
> immediately.
>
> Thank you.
> 


Re: Multiple option file in unix environment

2005-08-05 Thread Gerald Michalak
We do it by setting up stanzas in the dsm.sys file.

servername  tsma
  tcpserveraddresstsma.x.com
  nodename  client1

servername  tsmb
  tcpserveraddresstsmb.x.com
  nodename  client1



Then at startup of client,   dsmc -se=


Gerald Michalak
630-691-4819
pager 800-759-8352 # 1076423
AIX - Certified Support Technician


"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 08/05/2005
04:40:22 PM:

> How to use multiple option file in unix TSM client like in Windows world?
>
> Like in Windows world,
>   we use 'dsmc -optfile=dsm1.opt' file with different tsm server
> in this new
> option file.
>
> How do I do this in unix world?.
>
> My objective is --> I backup my unix machine (Node1) to a TSM
> Server1. I want to
> restore from another TSM Server2 of another node (Node2). (I issued set
access
> on Node2 to Node1)
>
>
> Regards
> Muthu
> 202-458-8340 - Work


Re: SQL and delimiting fields

2005-08-04 Thread Gerald Michalak
basically it's a startup option to the dsmadmc command.. i.e.

dsmadmc -comma "selct xxx  > flatfile "

Gerald Michalak
630-691-4819
pager 800-759-8352 # 1076423
AIX - Certified Support Technician


"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 08/04/2005
09:18:23 AM:

> Hi *,
>
> I need to audit some backups we have on our TSM server running 5.1.6
> and AIX 4.3.3. I have a flat file and I run an SQL to query the TSM
> database for a specific node's archive and redirect output to a
> file. I've read up on the Administrator's Reference quide and see
> that I can use the -COMMADELIMITED parameter to output the SQL
> output. How do I incorporate this parameter as I can't find any
> reference to how to actually use it, only that it can be used.
>
> Rich


Re: Restoring Netware File System Data to Windows 2000?

2005-05-12 Thread Gerald
Thats only partially true. Restoring Unix file system data to another
flavor of unix works. Restoring different flavors of windows to one
another typically works too.

On 5/11/05, Stapleton, Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As is stated in the list's FAQ, you cannot restore one OS's files onto
> another OS.
> 
> --
> Mark Stapleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> IBM Certified Advanced Deployment Professional
> Tivoli Storage Management Solutions 2005
> Office 262.521.5627
> 
> >-Original Message-
> >From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> >Behalf Of Gerald
> >Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 5:11 PM
> >To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> >Subject: Restoring Netware File System Data to Windows 2000?
> >
> >Is it possible?
> >
> >My initial attempt says no.. I tried running the BA client 5.2.4,
> >configured it to a node that was a backup of a netware file server,
> >and couldn't get it to display any files such that i could select and
> >restore them.
> >
> >That surprises me a bit since I figured both OS's are essentially DOS
> >based - though I didn't try configuring a FAT32 file system.
> >
> >Thanks!
> >
> 


-- 
-Gerald


Restoring Netware File System Data to Windows 2000?

2005-05-11 Thread Gerald
Is it possible?

My initial attempt says no.. I tried running the BA client 5.2.4,
configured it to a node that was a backup of a netware file server,
and couldn't get it to display any files such that i could select and
restore them.

That surprises me a bit since I figured both OS's are essentially DOS
based - though I didn't try configuring a FAT32 file system.

Thanks!


Re: Restore Requesting Copypool tape first?

2005-04-19 Thread Gerald
> > If you delete the primary volume, doesn't the copy pool data get
> > released also?
> 
> Right you are, Andy. That is indeed what should happen.

This is TSM 5.2.x btw. Interesting.. if the primary pool volume is
deleted, would it remove references to the files on the copypool
volume such that a restore wouldn't restore those files by asking for
the copypool volume? Or does that depend on before/after expiration or
before/after reclamation of the copypool volume?

in other words, when do you actually lose access to those files if you
delete the primary pool volume?

Gerald


Restore Requesting Copypool tape first?

2005-04-15 Thread Gerald
I have a restore thats asking for the copypool tape first. Tape
0261DC. I'm a bit surprised by this since i'd think that there would
be some mention in the acitivty log of it asking for a primary pool
tape first before defering to a copypool tape. In this case it
doesn't. What i'm normally used to seeing is some mention of a request
of a primary pool tape, but that it can't mount it due to it's status
being "unavailable" before requesting the copy pool tape. The below
shows how a restore seems to go right for the copypool tape.

Can anyone think of a scenario where if all primary pool tapes were
marked "unavailable" that it would still ask for a copypool tape
without first asking for a primary pool tape?

03/15/05   08:09:06   ANR0406I Session 3445 started for node  FWAMEML114_EXCH 
   (TDP MSExchg) (Tcp/Ip 10.1.83.194(3682)).
(SESSION:  3445)
03/15/05   08:09:07   ANE4991I (Session: 3445, Node: FWAMEML114_EXCH)   TDP 
   MSExchg ACN3504 Data Protection for Exchange:  Starting 
   restore for server PS-PS-POGO-94. (SESSION: 3445) 
03/15/05   08:09:07   ANE4991I (Session: 3445, Node: FWAMEML114_EXCH)   TDP 
   MSExchg ACN3506 Data Protection for Exchange:  Starting 
   full restore of storage group Information Store
to  server
   PS-PS-POGO-94. (SESSION: 3445) 
03/15/05   08:09:07   ANR8326I 122: Mount LTO volume 0479BB R/O in
drive  DRIVE11
   (/dev/rmt0) of library LIB within  minutes.
 (SESSION:
   3445) 
03/15/05   08:18:18   ANR8335I 122: Verifying label of LTO volume 0479BB  in 
   drive DRIVE11 (/dev/rmt0). (SESSION: 3445) 
03/15/05   08:18:21   ANR8328I 122: LTO volume 0479BB mounted in drive  DRIVE11 
   (/dev/rmt0). (SESSION: 3445) 
03/15/05   08:18:21   ANR0510I Session 3445 opened input volume 0479BB. 
   (SESSION: 3445) 
03/15/05   08:19:52   ANR0514I Session 3445 closed volume 0479BB.  (SESSION: 
   3445) 
more...( to continue, 'C' to cancel) 
03/15/05   08:19:52   ANR1422W Read access denied for volume 0261DC -  volume 
   access mode="offsite". (SESSION: 3445) 
03/15/05   08:19:52   ANR1422W Read access denied for volume 0261DC -  volume 
   access mode="offsite". (SESSION: 3445) 
03/15/05   08:19:52   ANR0565W Retrieve or restore failed for session 3445  for 
   node FWAMEML114_EXCH (TDP MSExchg) - storage volume 
   0261DC inaccessible. (SESSION: 3445) 
03/15/05   08:19:52   ANR0403I Session 3445 ended for node
FWAMEML114_EXCH  (TDP
   MSExchg). (SESSION: 3445) 
03/15/05   08:19:52   ANR2812W License Audit completed - ATTENTION: Server  is 
   NOT in compliance with license terms. (SESSION:  3445) 
03/15/05   08:22:30   ANR8468I LTO volume 0479BB dismounted from drive  DRIVE11 
   (/dev/rmt0) in library LIB. (SESSION: 3445)


Re: 5.3.1.0 server available

2005-04-04 Thread Gerald Michalak
I installed this on my "test" server and now it can't find any of my
scratch tapes for db backups nor migrations.

If  I specify a tape for the db backup it works.


Gerald Michalak
630-691-4819
pager 800-759-8352 # 1076423
AIX - Certified Support Technician

"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 04/01/2005
10:57:17 AM:

> Hi *SM-ers!
> For those of you that haven't noticed it yet: the TSM 5.3.1.0 server code
is
> available for download:
>
ftp://service.boulder.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management/maintenance/

> server/v5r3/
> At this moment only for AIX and Linux, I think.
> Kindest regards,
> Eric van Loon
> KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
>
>
> **
> For information, services and offers, please visit our web site:
> http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain
> confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee
> only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of
> the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or
> distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or
> attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have
> received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately
> by return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart
> Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall
> not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this
> e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
> **


Re: Novell output redirection

2005-03-11 Thread Gerald Michalak
I'm told that the sample shown below elicits a message like " Excessive
command line arguments ".

Gerald Michalak
630-691-4819
pager 800-759-8352 # 1076423
AIX - Certified Support Technician

"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 03/11/2005
01:39:54 PM:

> only had to this once, think i remember but ...
>
>   load sys:tivoli\tsm\client\ba\dsmc q backup > sys:etc/out.log
>
> Maybe rabbit maybe ...
>
> Aaron
>
> Aaron Durkee
> Infrastructure Analyst
> Networking and Technical Group
> Catholic Health Systems, Inc.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> phone: (716) 862-1713
> fax: (716) 862-1717
>
> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/11/05 02:30PM >>>
> My Novell admins are try to figure out how to redirect the output of the
'q
> backup' command to a text file. I don't see any options in the user
guide.
>
> Any help would be appreciated.
>
> Novell Version5.01f
> TSM Client V  5.1.6.6
>
>
> Gerald Michalak
> 630-691-4819
> pager 800-759-8352 # 1076423
> AIX - Certified Support Technician


Novell output redirection

2005-03-11 Thread Gerald Michalak
My Novell admins are try to figure out how to redirect the output of the 'q
backup' command to a text file. I don't see any options in the user guide.

Any help would be appreciated.

Novell Version5.01f
TSM Client V  5.1.6.6


Gerald Michalak
630-691-4819
pager 800-759-8352 # 1076423
AIX - Certified Support Technician


Re: STK 9940B Tape Drive Exp with TSM?

2005-03-01 Thread Gerald Michalak
We are using the 9940B drives in a STK Powderhorn silo. We have 20 drives
shared between 2 TSM servers using the Gresham software.

As to the reliability, I've seen the same problems quoted by others.
However, these seem to dissipate with use, like a long painful burn in
period.

Right now we still average 2 stuck tapes per month in these drives. These
require a service call to have a tech come out and remove the tape.

The Gresham software seems solid with some nice utilities to help manage
the drives. You'll learn to love/hate the qlock_drive utility, as it shows
which drives are locked to which server. If the process that locked the
drive, expires ??, then you will have to manually issue unlock and dismount
commands.

Some additional maintenance but we have monitoring scripts that page us
when something happens.

Good Luck.

Gerald Michalak
630-691-4819
pager 800-759-8352 # 1076423
AIX - Certified Support Technician

"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 03/01/2005
10:07:29 AM:

> Our management is asking us to look at converting our IBM 3592J to
> 9940B. (no comment)...  Most of our remote sites use 9940B drives
> with Netbackup, and in the past year we have seen many 9940b drives
> replaced (10 out of 40) in the past year, many tapes getting stuck
> etc...  I have heard from other people who use 9940b's and have good
> luck with them so I'm not sure if our 9940B issues are hdw or
> netbackup related.
>
> With that said I have a couple questions for those of you using
9940B's
>
> 1) 9940B Drives using ACLS / Gersham Reliable?
>
> 2) Can we share a STK Silo with TSM and NBU. (Some of the thinking
> is to do DR for some remote sites that have 9940B's)
>
>
> Appreciate your input!
>
> Regards,
>
> Charles

Notes TDP 5.1.5

2004-10-28 Thread Gerald
A question regarding TDP if anyone knows for sure..

The way the Notes TDP replays incremental logs is it pulls down a
single 64MB TXN file at a time, replays those transactions, then pulls
the next one down (restores). It's a pretty slow process that spends
most of the restore time actually replaying the transactions. The
restore of those single TXN files is quick and dirty. If a restore
takes 12 hours to do the incremental portion, most of those 20 hours
isn't restoring the actual TXN files but rather replaying the data
between each TXN file.

Does anyone know if theres a quicker way? Perhaps i can selectively
restore all TXN files and dump them to disk someplace, then initiate a
Notes command to replay them straight off disk, taking TSM out of the
equation and more importantly, freeing up the drive for another job?


TDP for Notes Restore Problem

2004-10-25 Thread Gerald Wichmann
We have Lotus Notes backups done with the TDP 5.1.5 (Notes v5.x). Back
in January the server name was called "TEST". In March, the server was
renamed to "TEST-OLD" and we continued to do backups by creating a new
node "TEST". So now we have data from Jan through March under
"TEST-OLD" and from March on called "TEST"...

We have not expired any data since since January..

Our normal rotation is to do a weekly full and daily incrementals.
There is a problem though that i'm finding. The first full backup for
TEST was done March 15th. The server rename was done on March 7th. Now
when I look back i see:

March 1st - Full taken now under TEST-OLD
March 2-7 - Incrementals now under TEST-OLD
March 8-14 - Incrementals now under TEST
March 15 - Full taken now under TEST

So the question is whether or not March 8-14 can be restored? It seems
not unless someone has any ideas. TSM thinks there is no full for TEST
prior to the 15th so how can it? Have we lost access to the data on
these dates?


Querying What tapes you need for a restore?

2004-02-19 Thread Gerald Wichmann
Is there a way to query a list of tapes needed for a given restore prior to
doing the restore such that you can ensure all those tapes are in your
library prior to kicking off the restore? I think the normal mode of
operation is if you were to do a restore that involved several tapes and
some tapes were in your library and some were not, it would move along fine
with those tapes it has but the restore would halt and issue a mount request
for those that aren't in the library. I'd like to avoid that mount request
and just ensure all the tapes are in the library beforehand.

Gerald



This e-mail has been captured and archived by the ZANTAZ Digital Safe(tm)
service.  For more information, visit us at www.zantaz.com.
IMPORTANT: This electronic mail message is intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information
that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received
this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by
telephone or directly reply to the original message(s) sent.  Thank you.


Lotus Notes TDP Question

2004-01-26 Thread Gerald Wichmann
When restoring with the Notes TDP, I notice the files according to the GUI
will have one date (e.g. 1/2/02) but when I restore them, they end up with
today's date/time. I.e. the modification date/time is not preserved through
the course of the restore. Is this the normal behavior? I am a bit surprised
by it and wondering if there's some way to preserve it.

Thanks,
Gerald



This e-mail has been captured and archived by the ZANTAZ Digital Safe(tm)
service.  For more information, visit us at www.zantaz.com.
IMPORTANT: This electronic mail message is intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information
that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received
this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by
telephone or directly reply to the original message(s) sent.  Thank you.


Tape Volumes Needed for a Restore

2003-12-01 Thread Gerald Wichmann
If I load the TSM GUI and select a few directories to restore, is there some
way to determine which tapes will be required to satisfy that restore? A
sort of preview=yes option for restores? Or how would you determine which
tapes you need given a point in time restore of an entire server?

Thanks,
Gerald



This e-mail has been captured and archived by the ZANTAZ Digital Safe(tm)
service.  For more information, visit us at www.zantaz.com.
IMPORTANT: This electronic mail message is intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information
that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received
this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by
telephone or directly reply to the original message(s) sent.  Thank you.


ANR0548W Retrieve or restore failed

2003-11-24 Thread Gerald Wichmann
Thanks.. Turns out I figured out what that error meant in my case. I was
doing a wildcard restore which is considered a "no query restore" since I'm
using a wildcard instead of specifying the actual file names. TSM is simply
telling me which files were unavailable. So I used the GUI to restore the
actual files in that directory using a point in time and I get a different
error, ANR0548W.

Now I did a quick "q vol" on these volumes and they are all a part of my
onsite backup pool. The tapes that I have are offsite copypool tapes.
According to the below help on ANR0548W if I retry the operation it should
ask for the copypool tape. It doesn't.. it just spits out the same below
errors again. I'm guessing that either I have a problem with my DB or tape
(less likely), the data isn't in a copy pool at all (equally unlikely) or
the offsite copypool volume it wants is status unavailable and perhaps TSM
just doesn't tell me that's the root of the problem?

I would really like to make it so it requests the copypool tape first and
not my primary pool's tapes. Is there someway of doing this?

My database is huge (100GB). I set my primary pool volumes all to access
destroyed. I set those tapes that I do have (some offsite ocpypool tapes
that I care about) to acc=reado. Just seem to be having trouble getting the
data to restore now.

ANR1424W Read access denied for volume A00773 - volume access
mode="destroyed".
ANR0548W Retrieve or restore failed for session 107 for node MDCTXUDSE261
(WinNT) processing file space \\mdctxudse261\d$ 2 for file \LOTUS\ DOMINO
stored as
Backup - data integrity error detected.
ANR1424W Read access denied for volume A02539 - volume access
mode="destroyed".
ANR0548W Retrieve or restore failed for session 107 for node MDCTXUDSE261
(WinNT) processing file space \\mdctxudse261\d$ 2 for file \LOTUS\DOMINO\
DATA
stored as Backup - data integrity error detected.
ANR1424W Read access denied for volume A00773 - volume access
mode="destroyed".
ANR0548W Retrieve or restore failed for session 107 for node MDCTXUDSE261
(WinNT) processing file space \\mdctxudse261\d$ 2 for file \LOTUS\ DOMINO
stored as
Backup - data integrity error detected.
ANR1424W Read access denied for volume A02539 - volume access
mode="destroyed".
ANR0548W Retrieve or restore failed for session 107 for node MDCTXUDSE261
(WinNT) processing file space \\mdctxudse261\d$ 2 for file \LOTUS\DOMINO\
DATA
stored as Backup - data integrity error detected.
ANR1424W Read access denied for volume A02033 - volume access
mode="destroyed".
ANR0548W Retrieve or restore failed for session 107 for node MDCTXUDSE261
(WinNT) processing file space \\mdctxudse261\d$ 2 for file
\LOTUS\DOMINO\DATA\
NAMES.NSF stored as Backup - data integrity error detected.
ANR1424W Read access denied for volume A00773 - volume access
mode="destroyed".
ANR0548W Retrieve or restore failed for session 107 for node MDCTXUDSE261
(WinNT) processing file space \\mdctxudse261\d$ 2 for file \ LOTUS stored as
Backup
- data integrity error detected.


tsm: MDCTXUTSM03>help anr0548w

---

ANR0548W Retrieve or restore failed for session session number for node node
name (client platform) processing file space filespace filespace id for file
file name stored as storage repository - data integrity error detected.

Explanation: The server ends a file retrieval operation for the specified
session because an internal database integrity error has been encountered on
the server.

System Action: The server ends the specified session and continues
operation.

User Response: Re-try the restore or retrieve operation and if the file is
also backed up in a copy storage pool, the operation will attempt to read
the file from the alternate location.



Gerald Wichmann
Manager, Systems Engineering
Data Restoration
ZANTAZ, Inc.
925.598.3099 (w)

-Original Message-
From: Richard Sims [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 3:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ANR0836W No query restore

>When attempting to do a restore I'm getting the messages below.. There is
no
>other accompanying information. Anyone know what it means? There is nothing
>in the messages guide that sheds any light as to this ANR..
...

Gerald - I have real-world notes on a variety of messages in
 http://people.bu.edu/rbs/ADSM.QuickFacts
including that one.  May help. Richard Sims, BU


This e-mail has been captured and archived by the ZANTAZ Digital Safe(tm)
service.  For more information, visit us at www.zantaz.com.
IMPORTANT: This electronic mail message is intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information
that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If the reader of this message is no

ANR0836W No query restore

2003-11-24 Thread Gerald Wichmann
When attempting to do a restore I'm getting the messages below.. There is no
other accompanying information. Anyone know what it means? There is nothing
in the messages guide that sheds any light as to this ANR..



ANR0836W No query restore processing session 93 for node MDCTXUDSE261 and
\\mdctxudse261\d$ failed to retrieve file \LOTUS\DOMINO\DATA\W32\CCMAIL.BMP
- file
being skipped.
ANR0836W No query restore processing session 93 for node MDCTXUDSE261 and
\\mdctxudse261\d$ failed to retrieve file \LOTUS\DOMINO\DATA\W32\AUTORUN.BMP
- file
being skipped.
ANR0836W No query restore processing session 93 for node MDCTXUDSE261 and
\\mdctxudse261\d$ failed to retrieve file \LOTUS\DOMINO\DATA\W32\AMIPRO.MAC
- file
being skipped.
ANR0836W No query restore processing session 93 for node MDCTXUDSE261 and
\\mdctxudse261\d$ failed to retrieve file \LOTUS\DOMINO\DATA\W32\AMIPRO.BMP
- file
being skipped.
ANR0836W No query restore processing session 93 for node MDCTXUDSE261 and
\\mdctxudse261\d$ failed to retrieve file
\LOTUS\DOMINO\DATA\W32\AMIMENUS.BMP - file
being skipped.
ANR0836W No query restore processing session 93 for node MDCTXUDSE261 and
\\mdctxudse261\d$ failed to retrieve file \LOTUS\DOMINO\DATA\W32\123W.MAC -
file
being skipped.



Gerald Wichmann
Manager, Systems Engineering
Data Restoration
ZANTAZ, Inc.
925.598.3099 (w)



This e-mail has been captured and archived by the ZANTAZ Digital Safe(tm)
service.  For more information, visit us at www.zantaz.com.
IMPORTANT: This electronic mail message is intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information
that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received
this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by
telephone or directly reply to the original message(s) sent.  Thank you.


Offsite Volume?

2003-11-24 Thread Gerald Wichmann
I have a TSM 5.1.x server where I have a handful of tapes. They are a part
of an offsite storage pool. I do not have the onsite storage pool tapes. If
I try to do a restore of this data, TSM tries to mount the onsite tapes.
What should I do to get TSM to ask for the offsite ones? Don't I just set
the onsite ones to acc=destroyed and the offsite ones to acc=reado and
voila, TSM should ask for the right tape?


This e-mail has been captured and archived by the ZANTAZ Digital Safe(tm)
service.  For more information, visit us at www.zantaz.com.
IMPORTANT: This electronic mail message is intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information
that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received
this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by
telephone or directly reply to the original message(s) sent.  Thank you.


Querying the date a file was backed up

2003-11-21 Thread Gerald Wichmann
I've got a volume that I've done a query content on. I can't tell what date
the files were backed up that are on that volume though. A Q content gives
me the node name, type, filespace name, fsid, and client's name for file.
I'm thinking I have to do a select query to pull this off but somehow I need
a method to figure out what date the objects in a query content for a volume
were backed up. Any suggestions?  The closest I've come is I got a ballpark
date by doing a select * from volumes for the volume which tells me when it
was last written to. It doesn't give me the date of an individual item
though. I need a finer level of granularity.

Appreciate the help!

Gerald


Gerald Wichmann
Manager, Systems Engineering
Data Restoration
ZANTAZ, Inc.
925.598.3099 (w)



This e-mail has been captured and archived by the ZANTAZ Digital Safe(tm)
service.  For more information, visit us at www.zantaz.com.
IMPORTANT: This electronic mail message is intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information
that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received
this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by
telephone or directly reply to the original message(s) sent.  Thank you.


Querying the data a file was backed up on a volume

2003-11-06 Thread Gerald Wichmann
I've got a volume that I've don't a query content on. I can't tell what date
the files were backed up that are on that volume though. I'm thinking I have
to do a select query to pull this off but somehow I need a method to figure
out what date the objects in a query content for a volume were backed up.
Any suggestions?  The closest I've come is I got a ballpark date by doing a
select * from volumes for the volume which tells me when it was last written
to. It doesn't give me the date of an individual item though. I need a finer
level of granularity.

Appreciate the help!

Gerald



This e-mail has been captured and archived by the ZANTAZ Digital Safe(tm)
service.  For more information, visit us at www.zantaz.com.
IMPORTANT: This electronic mail message is intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information
that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received
this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by
telephone or directly reply to the original message(s) sent.  Thank you.


TSM TDP for Notes Experts?

2003-11-05 Thread Gerald Wichmann
I wanted to ask something more specific as I'm not very strong in regards to
Lotus Notes and their backups/restores.

I have old backups of a Notes 5.x server that were supposedly taken with a
TDP for Notes v1.1.x..

1.  Is it possible to restore those restores with the latest TDP for
Notes (5.1.x)?
2.  Is it possible to restore those restores with the latest TDP for
Notes (5.1.x) to Notes 6.x?

Thanks,
Gerald


This e-mail has been captured and archived by the ZANTAZ Digital Safe(tm)
service.  For more information, visit us at www.zantaz.com.
IMPORTANT: This electronic mail message is intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information
that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received
this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by
telephone or directly reply to the original message(s) sent.  Thank you.


Data Protection Agent for Notes

2003-11-05 Thread Gerald Wichmann
Does anyone have a good understanding of the Lotus Notes Data Protection
Agents and their history? From what I can gather there are/were 3 versions..

1.1.x
2.1.x
5.1.x

Similarly there are different versions of notes - 4.x, 5.x, 6.x..

What is restore-compatible with what in this matrix? If I have backups of a
Notes 5.x server that were originally taken with 1.1, can I restore with 2.1
or 5.1 as well?
Gerald Wichmann



This e-mail has been captured and archived by the ZANTAZ Digital Safe(tm)
service.  For more information, visit us at www.zantaz.com.
IMPORTANT: This electronic mail message is intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information
that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received
this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by
telephone or directly reply to the original message(s) sent.  Thank you.


dsmserv loadformat failure

2003-10-22 Thread Gerald Wichmann
Anyone know what errno=2 means below? The /tsm partition exists and has 777
permissions so I'm thinking it's not a permissions problem. Does it expect
those files to already have been created via dsmfmt? Currently the files do
not exist.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/tivoli/tsm/server/bin# dsmserv loadformat 1
/tsm/tsmlog.001 5000 3 /tsm/tsmdb.001 3 /tsm/tsmdb.002 3
/tsm/tsmdb.003 3
ANR7800I DSMSERV generated at 12:37:06 on Aug 21 2002.

Tivoli Storage Manager for AIX-RS/6000
Version 5, Release 1, Level 5.0

Licensed Materials - Property of IBM

5698-ISE (C) Copyright IBM Corporation 1999,2002. All rights reserved.
U.S. Government Users Restricted Rights - Use, duplication or disclosure
restricted by GSA ADP Schedule Contract with IBM Corporation.

ANR0900I Processing options file dsmserv.opt.
ANR0921I Tracing is now active to file /tsm/trace.out.
ANR7811I Direct I/O will be used for all eligible disk files.
Error opening file /tsm/tsmlog.001, errno = 2



Thanks,
Gerald




This e-mail has been captured and archived by the ZANTAZ Digital Safe(tm)
service.  For more information, visit us at www.zantaz.com.
IMPORTANT: This electronic mail message is intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information
that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received
this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by
telephone or directly reply to the original message(s) sent.  Thank you.


Automatically setting a volume to "unavailable"

2003-10-10 Thread Gerald Wichmann
Is there a way to make TSM *not* mark a volume unavailable when there's a
problem reading it?

Gerald Wichmann
Manager, Systems Engineering
ZANTAZ, Inc.
925.598.3099 (w)



This e-mail has been captured and archived by the ZANTAZ Digital Safe(tm)
service.  For more information, visit us at www.zantaz.com.
IMPORTANT: This electronic mail message is intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information
that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received
this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by
telephone or directly reply to the original message(s) sent.  Thank you.


TSM Query to determine what is on a single tape

2003-10-06 Thread Gerald Wichmann
Given a tape, is there a select query that will tell me what servers have
data on that particular tape? It'd be nice to know what file systems as well
but that level of granularity isn't necessary. I.e. I have tape XYZ, I run
query and find out CLIENTA, CLIENTB, and CLIENTC have data on it.


Gerald Wichmann
Manager, Systems Engineering
ZANTAZ, Inc.
925.598.3099 (w)



This e-mail has been captured and archived by the ZANTAZ Digital Safe(tm)
service.  For more information, visit us at www.zantaz.com.
IMPORTANT: This electronic mail message is intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information
that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received
this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by
telephone or directly reply to the original message(s) sent.  Thank you.


Exchange TDP Query Question

2003-10-03 Thread Gerald Wichmann
TSM TDP for Exchange v5.2.1

I'm running the following query using the TDP's cmdline executable ->
tdpexcc q tsm * /AL /FROMEXCSERV="*"

Would that in theory show me ALL exchange server backups that the TSM
database knows about for ALL exchange servers?

I realize if there are v1.1.1 backups, this 5.2.1 client would not show
those and I'd need to do a similar query with v1.1.1 to see those. But 5.x
is backwards compatible with 2.x so minimum I'm trying to query a complete
and comprehensive list of what backups TSM has for all exchange servers..

Thanks,

Gerald Wichmann
Manager, Systems Engineering
ZANTAZ, Inc.
925.598.3099 (w)



This e-mail has been captured and archived by the ZANTAZ Digital Safe(tm)
service.  For more information, visit us at www.zantaz.com.
IMPORTANT: This electronic mail message is intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information
that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received
this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by
telephone or directly reply to the original message(s) sent.  Thank you.


TSM TDP for MS Exchange

2003-10-02 Thread Gerald Wichmann
I'm trying to find out what the history of versions are for this TDP..

I currently have an old CD with 1.1.1 on it. I know the current version is
5.2.1 according to passport advantage and that I can also get 5.1.5 from
there. Is there anything between those version? I understand there is a 2.x?

Thanks,

Gerald Wichmann
Manager, Systems Engineering
ZANTAZ, Inc.
925.598.3099 (w)



This e-mail has been captured and archived by the ZANTAZ Digital Safe(tm)
service.  For more information, visit us at www.zantaz.com.
IMPORTANT: This electronic mail message is intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information
that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received
this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by
telephone or directly reply to the original message(s) sent.  Thank you.


Moving TSM from one platform to another

2003-10-01 Thread Gerald Wichmann
Is it possible to move from MVS to AIX without having to export all client
node data so long are your storage device is the same on both environments?

i.e. if my current environment has 2000 tapes full of client data, and I
want to move my environment from MVS to AIX, do I essentially have to export
2000 tapes, create 2000 new tapes, and import those 2000 new tapes to my AIX
environment to read the client data (thus creating another 2000 tapes)? Or
would the present 2000 tapes be readable from the AIX environment as long as
I export the server without the filedata and import it into the AIX
environment (and have the same type of device connected to the AIX server of
course)? In other words I'm trying to gauge how much work it is to move TSM
from one platform to another..

If I remember correctly it's ugly and you do have to export all the client
data as well..



This e-mail has been captured and archived by the ZANTAZ Digital Safe(tm)
service.  For more information, visit us at www.zantaz.com.
IMPORTANT: This electronic mail message is intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information
that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received
this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by
telephone or directly reply to the original message(s) sent.  Thank you.


Exporting a TSM Server Across Platforms

2003-09-26 Thread Gerald Wichmann
If I have a TSM server on an MVS environment backing up Lotus Notes servers
running AIX, and I'd like to migrate my TSM server environment to an AIX
platform, if I recall the steps are fairly straight forward and this is not
a difficult task. Put simply it's:

1.  Do an export of the TSM Server on the MVS environment to tape.
2.  Move the library to the new AIX server
3.  Do an import of the previously made export on the new AIX server
4.  voila.. done.. all Notes/AIX restores/tapes are now restorable.

Specifically I don't believe it's necessary to export all the client data
but you only need to export the TSM server itself right? In other words you
cannot restore a TSM DB tape created from the MVS environment to an AIX
environment. You actually have to export the server to move between
environments in this manner. And you don't need to do it for all the client
data, though I suppose you could.. Is that correct?


This e-mail has been captured and archived by the ZANTAZ Digital Safe(tm)
service.  For more information, visit us at www.zantaz.com.
IMPORTANT: This electronic mail message is intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information
that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received
this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by
telephone or directly reply to the original message(s) sent.  Thank you.


Re: TSM and DR

2003-09-19 Thread Gerald Wichmann
You guys are reading into the question WAY more then need be =). It was a
scenario question and all time lines were made up to drive home the point of
what I was trying to get at, and that's the potential for expire inventory
to expire data you maybe don't want expired. Even if your turn around for a
true disaster is supposedly 48 hours, I would imagine you'd still be
interested in what the question was getting at (if nothing else, just to be
aware of how TSM works if it was a concern).

Also it's a good point that you'd probably only be interested in ACTIVE
files when recovering your environment but none the less, humor me and
assume you're also interested in ensuring no INACTIVE version is lost. In
that case what can one do to ensure no data is expired AT ALL? The only
thing I can think of is to ensure expire inventory never runs. The
dsmserv.opt entry would help prevent that prior to recovering the database
but what about any admin schedules that might've been defined? Is it
possible to disable client and admin scheduling without first starting TSM?

Gerald

-Original Message-
From: Prather, Wanda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 10:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM and DR

I agree with prior comments that you should have tapes available for DR that
are more current than 3 months back.

However, in MOST cases, even if expiration runs it probably won't cause
problems; TSM is NEVER going to be expiring the ACTIVE files associated with
a node.  And in MOST cases for DR, you are trying to get your client
machines restored to the latest possible level.

Now where you get in trouble, is if you let the client run a new BACKUP,
before you have restored everything you need.  When the client runs, it will
flag any files not on the hard drive as being expired, and that may have
side effects you don't want.

So I would say in a DR situation you should turn off your client schedules.




-Original Message-
From: Gerald Wichmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 1:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TSM and DR


Say for a moment you're faced with recovering a TSM server in a DR
situation. You have your DB backup and copypool tapes and perform a database
recovery. If that DB was created back in January and it's now March, isn't
there a potential for objects getting expired the first time you start the
TSM server? E.g. when the TSM server is started it typically performs an
expire inventory as part of that sequence. I would imagine that now that
it's 2 months later, would it therefore start expiring objects that you
probably don't want to have expired?

If not, why not?
If so, whats the appropriate step to take before starting the TSM server (or
perhaps even before recovering the DB) to ensure expire inventory doesn't
ruin your recovery? I recall there being an option in dsmserv.opt that
allows you to turn off automatic expire inventory. That seems like a good
idea.. but what if there was an admin schedule that runs expire inventory
back then and you happen to start the recovery while in the schedule's
window?

I think you can see what I'm getting at with all this. I want to make sure
all my bases are covered..


This e-mail has been captured and archived by the ZANTAZ Digital Safe(tm)
service.  For more information, visit us at www.zantaz.com.
IMPORTANT: This electronic mail message is intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information
that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received
this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by
telephone or directly reply to the original message(s) sent.  Thank you.


This e-mail has been captured and archived by the ZANTAZ Digital Safe(tm)
service.  For more information, visit us at www.zantaz.com.
IMPORTANT: This electronic mail message is intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information
that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received
this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by
telephone or directly reply to the original message(s) sent.  Thank you.


TSM and DR

2003-09-19 Thread Gerald Wichmann
Say for a moment you're faced with recovering a TSM server in a DR
situation. You have your DB backup and copypool tapes and perform a database
recovery. If that DB was created back in January and it's now March, isn't
there a potential for objects getting expired the first time you start the
TSM server? E.g. when the TSM server is started it typically performs an
expire inventory as part of that sequence. I would imagine that now that
it's 2 months later, would it therefore start expiring objects that you
probably don't want to have expired?

If not, why not?
If so, whats the appropriate step to take before starting the TSM server (or
perhaps even before recovering the DB) to ensure expire inventory doesn't
ruin your recovery? I recall there being an option in dsmserv.opt that
allows you to turn off automatic expire inventory. That seems like a good
idea.. but what if there was an admin schedule that runs expire inventory
back then and you happen to start the recovery while in the schedule's
window?

I think you can see what I'm getting at with all this. I want to make sure
all my bases are covered..


This e-mail has been captured and archived by the ZANTAZ Digital Safe(tm)
service.  For more information, visit us at www.zantaz.com.
IMPORTANT: This electronic mail message is intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information
that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received
this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by
telephone or directly reply to the original message(s) sent.  Thank you.


TSM Client Query

2003-09-12 Thread Gerald Wichmann
We frequently get tapes from other sources and are expected to restore them.
The problem I'm finding is the original environment sends me their TSM
database and it may have restores for a given server (say SERVERA) going
back a year (so lets say 365 backups that the TSM DB is aware of). Now they
only send me 200 tapes and I'm faced with figuring out which of those
backups that the DB knows about for SERVERA do I *actually have*? I realize
this is probably a perfect candidate for a select query or macro where I
pass in a list of volumes and it spits out what backup dates it knows about.
Something I'll have to figure out how to determine.

Similarly I'm curious though whether this is doable with Agent backups
(specifically Exchange)..

Anyone develop something like this so I don't have to reinvent the wheel?
Any thoughts? Appreciate the help lately.

Thanks!
Gerald



This e-mail has been captured and archived by the ZANTAZ Digital Safe(tm)
service.  For more information, visit us at www.zantaz.com.
IMPORTANT: This electronic mail message is intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information
that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received
this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by
telephone or directly reply to the original message(s) sent.  Thank you.


TSM 4.2 and Exchange TDP 1.1.1

2003-09-11 Thread Gerald Wichmann
I was just looking at my Exchange TDP output and have it showing all
exchange backups ever created. It shows directory backups and information
store backups (full and incremental. exchange 5.5). Is there someway I can
query our output this list of backups to a text file? On the TDP side I
don't see anything in the GUI. I'm guessing I need to do something with the
TDP cmdline to query a list of this (with dates) so I can hand this to
someone and get an idea of what to restore. Time to read some notes but if
someone knows off the top of their head how to do this I'd appreciate the
info.

Gerald



This e-mail has been captured and archived by the ZANTAZ Digital Safe(tm)
service.  For more information, visit us at www.zantaz.com.
IMPORTANT: This electronic mail message is intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information
that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received
this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by
telephone or directly reply to the original message(s) sent.  Thank you.


TSM Coredumps when started..

2003-09-10 Thread Gerald Wichmann
TSM is core dumping on my test server. It looks to me like it ran out of log
space but just wanted to confirm that as it's been a while since I've had
this happen. How do I proceed to restart my TSM server at this point?

Tivoli Storage Manager for AIX-RS/6000
Version 4, Release 2, Level 4.0

Licensed Materials - Property of IBM

5698-TSM (C) Copyright IBM Corporation 1999,2001. All rights reserved.
U.S. Government Users Restricted Rights - Use, duplication or disclosure
restricted by GSA ADP Schedule Contract with IBM Corporation.

ANR0900I Processing options file dsmserv.opt.
ANR0921I Tracing is now active to file /tsm/trace.out.
ANR0990I Server restart-recovery in progress.
ANR0200I Recovery log assigned capacity is 5120 megabytes.
ANR0201I Database assigned capacity is 2 megabytes.
ANR0306I Recovery log volume mount in progress.
ANR0353I Recovery log analysis pass in progress.
ANR0354I Recovery log redo pass in progress.
ANR0355I Recovery log undo pass in progress.
ANRD logseg.c(498): ThreadId<4> Log space has been overcommitted (no
empty segment found) - base LSN = 525679.0.0.
ANR7838S Server operation terminated.
ANR7837S Internal error LOGSEG871 detected.
  0x1008E48C LogAllocSegment
  0x1008B2E0 ForceLogPages
  0x1008BCE4 LogWriterThread
  0x10006DC4 StartThread
  0xD00080CC _pthread_body
ANR7833S Server thread 1 terminated in response to program abort.
ANR7833S Server thread 2 terminated in response to program abort.
ANR7833S Server thread 3 terminated in response to program abort.
ANR7833S Server thread 4 terminated in response to program abort.
ANR7833S Server thread 5 terminated in response to program abort.
ANR7833S Server thread 6 terminated in response to program abort.
ANR7833S Server thread 7 terminated in response to program abort.
ANR7833S Server thread 8 terminated in response to program abort.
IOT/Abort trap(coredump)



This e-mail has been captured and archived by the ZANTAZ Digital Safe(tm)
service.  For more information, visit us at www.zantaz.com.
IMPORTANT: This electronic mail message is intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information
that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received
this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by
telephone or directly reply to the original message(s) sent.  Thank you.


LTO throughput - real world experiences

2003-07-08 Thread Gerald Wichmann
I'm curious as to what kind of MB/sec throughput people are seeing with TSM
and LTO drives. I realize your mileage may vary and that it depends on your
configuration but lets face it most of us have somewhat similar
environments. A disk pool and tape pool. A mixture of file system data as
well as database data. How many MB/sec does a migration process produce in
your environment? Does anyone have any DB's streaming directly to LTO and
some figures? Appreciate any feedback

Gerald Wichmann
Senior Systems Development Engineer
ZANTAZ, Inc.
925.598.3099 (w)



This e-mail has been captured and archived by the ZANTAZ Digital Safe(tm)
service.  For more information, visit us at www.zantaz.com.
IMPORTANT: This electronic mail message is intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information
that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received
this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by
telephone or directly reply to the original message(s) sent.  Thank you.


Recovering TSM 4.2.0 Server

2003-07-07 Thread Gerald Wichmann
AIX 4.3.3, TSM 4.2.1 installed and running. DB backup tape is supposedly
4.2.0. Finally made some progress and the DB recovery started to work and
then failed. I'm not sure what to make of it.. Anyone have any suggestions?

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/tivoli/tsm/server/bin# dsmserv restore db
volumenames=SU3689 devclass=tapeclass
ANR7800I DSMSERV generated at 12:27:22 on Aug 29 2001.

Tivoli Storage Manager for AIX-RS/6000
Version 4, Release 2, Level 1.0

Licensed Materials - Property of IBM

5698-TSM (C) Copyright IBM Corporation 1999,2001. All rights reserved.
U.S. Government Users Restricted Rights - Use, duplication or disclosure
restricted by GSA ADP Schedule Contract with IBM Corporation.

ANR0900I Processing options file dsmserv.opt.
ANR8200I TCP/IP driver ready for connection with clients on port 1500.
ANR0200I Recovery log assigned capacity is 5120 megabytes.
ANR0201I Database assigned capacity is 4 megabytes.
ANR4621I Database backup device class TAPECLASS.
ANR4622I   Volume 1: SU3689.
ANR4632I Starting point-in-time database restore (no commit).
ANR8326I 001: Mount GENERICTAPE volume SU3689 R/O in drive LTO1 (/dev/rmt0)
of
library MANUAL within 60 minutes.
ANR8335I 001: Verifying label of GENERICTAPE volume SU3689 in drive LTO1
(/dev/rmt0).
ANR8328I 001: GENERICTAPE volume SU3689 mounted in drive LTO1 (/dev/rmt0).
ANRD pvrgts.c(4059): ThreadId<9> Invalid block header read from volume
SU3689.
(magic=5A4D, ver=20048, Hdr blk=5 , db=0
<262144,262144,0>)ANRD icrest.c(2076): ThreadId<0> Rc=30 reading header
record.
ANR2032E RESTORE DB: Command failed - internal server error detected.
ANR8468I GENERICTAPE volume SU3689 dismounted from drive LTO1 (/dev/rmt0) in
library MANUAL.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/tivoli/tsm/server/bin#



Gerald Wichmann
Senior Systems Development Engineer
ZANTAZ, Inc.
925.598.3099 (w)



This e-mail has been captured and archived by the ZANTAZ Digital Safe(tm)
service.  For more information, visit us at www.zantaz.com.
IMPORTANT: This electronic mail message is intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information
that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received
this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by
telephone or directly reply to the original message(s) sent.  Thank you.


TSM 4.2.1 and a Manual drive

2003-07-03 Thread Gerald Wichmann
I've been playing with my single external LTO drive and having problems with
the good ole "insufficient mount points available" error. I know getting TSM
to work with a manual drive is quirky and am probably missing something but
I'm able to label a cartridge fine using label libv so I assume the drive is
defined properly and working. However whenever I try a migration or run a
backup that forces a migration I get the insufficient mount points error.

My devclass has DRIVES for mount limit.. I've also tried "1" there but it
didn't help. My node in question has maxnump set to 1 which should be fine
too. Looking for other suggestions if anyone has any.. I searched the adsm
list archive and someone had mentioned doing a "reply" and that I had to
mount the tape but that doesn't seem to be the case here. It never puts for
a request for me to reply to. I've tried it both with the tape in the drive
and without it in the drive. The tape has been labeled successfully but
nothing shows up under "query libv" or "query vol". Far as I know you don't
have to check in a manual tape do you? Maybe that's my problem..

Gerald Wichmann
Senior Systems Development Engineer
ZANTAZ, Inc.
925.598.3099 (w)



This e-mail has been captured and archived by the ZANTAZ Digital Safe(tm)
service.  For more information, visit us at www.zantaz.com.
IMPORTANT: This electronic mail message is intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information
that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received
this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by
telephone or directly reply to the original message(s) sent.  Thank you.


Recovering a TSM 4.2.1 server

2003-07-03 Thread Gerald Wichmann
I've been given an LTO tape that is supposedly a TSM DB backup. The external
barcode label reads SU3689L1, which I assume is also the volume name as TSM
would see it. My intention is to recover the TSM database by doing a dsmserv
restore db. I do not have the volume history file or anything else from the
original server, so I created my own devconfig file and have a single LTO
tape drive connected and defined. Judging by the admin guide, the next step
I need to do is a dsmserv display dbbackupvolume devclass=tapeclass
vol=SU3689L1, however it comes back and errors out..

ANRD assd.c(1040): ThreadId<0> Unexpected result code (15) from
pvrAcquireMountPoint.
ANRD icstream.c(1606): ThreadId<0> Error 87 opening input stream.
ANR2032E DISPLAY DBBACKUPVOLUMES: Command failed - internal server error
detected.

I guess my primary question is whether some of my assumptions and techniques
are correct or not? Particularly on the volume name as I realize the barcode
doesn't necessarily equal the digital tape volume name stored on the tape.
Still is that a good assumption? Is it case sensitive? Am I doing something
obviously wrong?

For now I'm going to verify the tape drive works by putting in a blank tape
and attempting to write some data to it using TSM. If that works I'll return
to trying to recover the DB. Appreciate any help/feedback.

Gerald Wichmann
Senior Systems Development Engineer
ZANTAZ, Inc.
925.598.3099 (w)



This e-mail has been captured and archived by the ZANTAZ Digital Safe(tm)
service.  For more information, visit us at www.zantaz.com.
IMPORTANT: This electronic mail message is intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information
that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received
this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by
telephone or directly reply to the original message(s) sent.  Thank you.


Re: TSM & AIX compatibility

2003-06-05 Thread Gerald Wichmann
True perhaps I could but you must see what I'm getting at.. would I want to?
At that point I'd personally prefer to buy a pSeries based on the power4
architecture over power3 if I'm only looking at new servers. They're
significantly more powerful and yet similar in price (sometimes cheaper).

I must admit I have an ulterior motive to asking the question. I am
anticipating having the need to recover customer data in the future, based
on obtaining a copy of their TSM database and tapes. If I purchase a server
for this purpose and it utilizes the power4 architecture, I'm not going to
be able to process any customer's data based on TSM 4.2 on AIX 4.3. Probably
in my case it makes more sense to buy a power3 architecture server to be
more versatile.

Gerald Wichmann
Senior Systems Development Engineer
Zantaz, Inc.
925.598.3099 (w)

-Original Message-
From: Ochs, Duane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 9:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM & AIX compatibility

Realistically you would be able to find a machine that could run 4.3.3 and
you would be able to find TSM 4.2.

But to answer your questions:

1) Can I restore an older version DB snapshot to TSM 5.1.
 No you can not.

Duane

-Original Message-
From: Gerald Wichmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 11:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TSM & AIX compatibility


I'm just looking at some of the new IBM pSeries servers based on the power4
architecture. It's my understanding that they only run AIX 5L and not AIX
4.3.. That has me wondering about potential DR related problems with TSM.
Say my environment is currently TSM 4.2 on AIX 4.3.3 and I lose everything
in a disaster except my offsite tapes. Lets say the only replacement server
I can acquire is a new pSeries that only runs AIX 5L. Perhaps I even can
only get a newer version of TSM (5.1 or 5.2). Are there any compatibility
issues in recovering a TSM DB snapshot backup to a newer version of TSM
running on a newer version of AIX?

Gerald Wichmann
Senior Systems Development Engineer
Zantaz, Inc.
925.598.3099 (w)


.  Thank you.


This e-mail has been captured and archived by the ZANTAZ Digital Safe(tm)
service.  For more information, visit us at www.zantaz.com.
IMPORTANT: This electronic mail message is intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information
that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received
this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by
telephone or directly reply to the original message(s) sent.  Thank you.


TSM & AIX compatibility

2003-06-05 Thread Gerald Wichmann
I'm just looking at some of the new IBM pSeries servers based on the power4
architecture. It's my understanding that they only run AIX 5L and not AIX
4.3.. That has me wondering about potential DR related problems with TSM.
Say my environment is currently TSM 4.2 on AIX 4.3.3 and I lose everything
in a disaster except my offsite tapes. Lets say the only replacement server
I can acquire is a new pSeries that only runs AIX 5L. Perhaps I even can
only get a newer version of TSM (5.1 or 5.2). Are there any compatibility
issues in recovering a TSM DB snapshot backup to a newer version of TSM
running on a newer version of AIX?

Gerald Wichmann
Senior Systems Development Engineer
Zantaz, Inc.
925.598.3099 (w)



This e-mail has been captured and archived by the ZANTAZ Digital Safe(tm)
service.  For more information, visit us at www.zantaz.com.
IMPORTANT: This electronic mail message is intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information
that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received
this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by
telephone or directly reply to the original message(s) sent.  Thank you.


recovring a TSM server

2003-06-04 Thread Gerald Wichmann
Is it necessary to know the size of the original database and log for your
TSM server when doing a recovery or is it sufficient to just make it as big
or larger then the original before issuing the dsmserv recover db command?

Gerald Wichmann
Senior Systems Development Engineer
Zantaz, Inc.
925.598.3099 (w)



This e-mail has been captured and archived by the ZANTAZ Digital Safe(tm)
service.  For more information, visit us at www.zantaz.com.
IMPORTANT: This electronic mail message is intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information
that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received
this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by
telephone or directly reply to the original message(s) sent.  Thank you.


Restoring Domino Agent data to a different platform

2003-05-30 Thread Gerald Wichmann
Assuming someone were to give me tapes created using TDP for Lotus Domino
v1.1.1.0. Notes was running on AIX 4.3.3 being backed up to TSM 4.2.0
running on AIX 4.3.3.. I also get a copy of the TSM DB and recover from it.
When it comes time to restore that data would I need the target machine to
be a duplicate of the original (i.e. must be notes on AIX) or could it be an
alternative platform like Notes on Win2k (still using the TDP notes agent)?

Gerald Wichmann
Senior Systems Development Engineer
Zantaz, Inc.
925.598.3099 (w)



This e-mail has been captured and archived by the ZANTAZ Digital Safe(tm)
service.  For more information, visit us at www.zantaz.com.
IMPORTANT: This electronic mail message is intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information
that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received
this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by
telephone or directly reply to the original message(s) sent.  Thank you.


TSM vs Veritas?

2003-03-04 Thread Gerald Wichmann
I'm looking for a good recent comparison of TSM vs Veritas Netbackup...
Appreciate any links/suggestions on where to find a comparison.

Thanks,

Gerald Wichmann
Senior Systems Development Engineer
Zantaz, Inc.
925.598.3099 (w)



This e-mail has been captured and archived by the ZANTAZ Digital Safe(tm)
service.  For more information, visit us at www.zantaz.com.
IMPORTANT: This electronic mail message is intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information
that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received
this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by
telephone or directly reply to the original message(s) sent.  Thank you.


HSM

2002-12-11 Thread Gerald Wichmann
Anyone have a particularly large HSM environment and been using it a while?
I'm curious on any experiences with the product, good or bad. I would
imagine there must be some people out there who need long term storage of
infrequently accessed files and have considered it as a solution for that.

Gerald Wichmann
Senior Systems Development Engineer
Zantaz, Inc.
925.598.3099 (w)



This e-mail has been captured and archived by the ZANTAZ Digital Safe(tm)
service.  For more information, visit us at www.zantaz.com.
IMPORTANT: This electronic mail message is intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information
that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received
this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by
telephone or directly reply to the original message(s) sent.  Thank you.



TSM Client Software Fixes URL/FTP site

2002-12-05 Thread Gerald Wichmann
Whats the URL or FTP site these days to download client fixes? I've been
jumping around the new ibm site and it made me register, but hasn't provided
me with a password (says within 3 days). So I'm curious if theres a direct
URL I can get to it with.

Gerald Wichmann
Senior Systems Development Engineer
Zantaz, Inc.
925.598.3099 (w)



This e-mail has been captured and archived by the ZANTAZ Digital Safe(tm)
service.  For more information, visit us at www.zantaz.com.
IMPORTANT: This electronic mail message is intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information
that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received
this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by
telephone or directly reply to the original message(s) sent.  Thank you.



How to tell which tapes a restore requires?

2002-11-26 Thread Gerald Wichmann
Let me ask my question a different way. If I do a restore, the server
requests certain tapes to be mounted if they are offline and not physically
in the library. Is there any way to determine ahead of time what those tapes
are and put them in the library via a preview or something or do I always
have to run the restore and wait to see what tapes it wants?


This e-mail has been captured and archived by the ZANTAZ Digital Safe(tm)
service.  For more information, visit us at www.zantaz.com.
IMPORTANT: This electronic mail message is intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information
that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received
this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by
telephone or directly reply to the original message(s) sent.  Thank you.



Re: Querying which volumes have a particular file or node

2002-11-26 Thread Gerald Wichmann
Not exactly the answer I was looking for..

Gerald Wichmann
Senior Systems Development Engineer
Zantaz, Inc.
925.598.3099 (w)

-Original Message-
From: Raghu S [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 9:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Querying which volumes have a particular file or node

in Tivoli Storage Resource Manager all these are addressed

raghu.



Gerald
Wichmann To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Querying which volumes
have a
Sent by: particular file or node
"ADSM: Dist
Stor Manager"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RIST.EDU>


11/26/2002
03:25 AM
Please
respond to
"ADSM: Dist
Stor Manager"





Given a file with some filenames in it, does someone have a macro/command I
can run against the filenames in that file to determine what volumes those
files are on? I.e. so I can identify which offline volumes I need to put in
my library for a restore before actually running the restore command.

Similarly, given a node, how do I determine what volumes the node has data
backed up to.

I believe both these questions involve a select statement and have been
discussed before so someone should have them handy.

Thanks,
Gerald


This e-mail has been captured and archived by the ZANTAZ Digital Safe(tm)
service.  For more information, visit us at www.zantaz.com.
IMPORTANT: This electronic mail message is intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information
that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received
this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by
telephone or directly reply to the original message(s) sent.  Thank you.


This e-mail has been captured and archived by the ZANTAZ Digital Safe(tm)
service.  For more information, visit us at www.zantaz.com.
IMPORTANT: This electronic mail message is intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information
that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received
this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by
telephone or directly reply to the original message(s) sent.  Thank you.



Querying which volumes have a particular file or node

2002-11-25 Thread Gerald Wichmann
Given a file with some filenames in it, does someone have a macro/command I
can run against the filenames in that file to determine what volumes those
files are on? I.e. so I can identify which offline volumes I need to put in
my library for a restore before actually running the restore command.

Similarly, given a node, how do I determine what volumes the node has data
backed up to.

I believe both these questions involve a select statement and have been
discussed before so someone should have them handy.

Thanks,
Gerald


This e-mail has been captured and archived by the ZANTAZ Digital Safe(tm)
service.  For more information, visit us at www.zantaz.com.
IMPORTANT: This electronic mail message is intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information
that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received
this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by
telephone or directly reply to the original message(s) sent.  Thank you.



DB2 Backups on Solaris 8 Wrong documentation?

2002-11-11 Thread Gerald Wichmann
According to the Backing up DB2 PDF for backing up DB2 on Solaris, on page
92 step 2 it says:

2. The /etc/system must have, as a minimum, the following values. Modify
them as necessary, then reboot.
set lwp_default_stksize = 0x4000
set rpcmod:svc_run_stksize = 0x4000
set semsys:seminfo_semmap = 50
set semsys:seminfo_semmni = 50
set semsys:seminfo_semmns = 300
set semsys:seminfo_semmnu = 150
set semsys:seminfo_semopm = 50
set semsys:seminfo_semume = 50
set semsys:seminfo_semmsl = 125

The above svc_run_stksize parameter throws an error during Solaris boot that
says something to the effect of it being an invalid parameter. Is this a
typo in the book? Should it actually be svc_default_stksize?

Looking at -> http://docs.sun.com/db/doc/806-6779/6jfmsfr7h?q=set+rpcmod
<http://docs.sun.com/db/doc/806-6779/6jfmsfr7h?q=set+rpcmod&a=view> &a=view

I don't see an svc_run_stksize

Anyone?  IBM??

Gerald Wichmann
Senior Systems Development Engineer
Zantaz, Inc.
925.598.3099 (w)



This e-mail has been captured and archived by the ZANTAZ Digital Safe(tm)
service.  For more information, visit us at www.zantaz.com.
IMPORTANT: This electronic mail message is intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information
that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received
this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by
telephone or directly reply to the original message(s) sent.  Thank you.



Macros

2002-10-10 Thread Gerald Wichmann

Why would one use macros instead of a server script?

Gerald Wichmann
Senior Systems Development Engineer
Zantaz, Inc.
925.598.3099 (w)



This e-mail has been captured and archived by the ZANTAZ Digital Safe(tm)
service.  For more information, visit us at www.zantaz.com.
IMPORTANT: This electronic mail message is intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information
that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received
this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by
telephone or directly reply to the original message(s) sent.  Thank you.



Image Backups

2002-09-27 Thread Gerald Wichmann

-How does an "online" image backup work exactly in regards to open files?
According to the docs, "Corruption of the backup may occur if applications
write to the volume while the backup is in progress. In this case, run fsck
after a restore." So say this occurs.. What do you end up with backed up in
the case of that file that was written during the backup? The before version
or the after version? Or some hybrid fuzzy file after the restore? I don't
entirely see what good running fsck is going to be on a file that the bytes
changed in the middle of backing it up. Isn't the image just backing up at
the bit level and doesn't really pay attention to open files or changing
bytes? I guess I'd just like to hear more info on how an "online" image
backup would work.

-under "offline and online image backup" it also says "For linux86 only: TSM
performs an online image backup of file systems residing on a logical volume
created by the linux logical volume manager during which the volume is
available to other system applications". Can I infer that if I am just using
reiserfs that I cannot then do an online image backup - only an offline via
the device itself?

-I find it interesting that you can do an incremental image backup and not
entirely sure how that works either. Isn't an image backup just backing up
the filesystem bit by bit? How does it know which bits changed or which
files? If I read this correctly, it only works with lvm's. It says "Two
types of backup only apply to logical volumes: mode=selective (the default)
and mode=incremental.". So in the case of linux, if you're using reiserfs
I'm guessing you can't do an incremental image backup. You'd have to use
ext3 or something similar.

Gerald Wichmann
Senior Systems Development Engineer
Zantaz, Inc.
925.598.3099 (w)



This e-mail has been captured and archived by the ZANTAZ Digital Safe(tm)
service.  For more information, visit us at www.zantaz.com.
IMPORTANT: This electronic mail message is intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information
that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received
this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by
telephone or directly reply to the original message(s) sent.  Thank you.



Re: TSM with library & 1 drive

2002-09-25 Thread Gerald Wichmann

1. Nothing wrong with it per say.. It works great. You'll have to allocate
some disk space for your reclamation pool but in my experience it works
well. Also there are the obvious limitations that having only 1 drive
presents such as when someone requests a restore, if their data is on tape
and another user is already doing a restore they'll have to wait for that
drive to free up. Also similar potential limitations in backup or migration
of data. No redundancy so if the drive dies you're out of luck until it's
fixed or replaced (can't backup or restore any data to/from tape). The same
things you'd bring up if you were considering 2 drives vs 3.. or 4.. The
NEED for 2 drives over one is mostly a throughput, redundancy, and
availability issue.
2. nothing wrong with an autoloader.. works just like a tape library more or
less.

Gerald Wichmann
Senior Systems Development Engineer
Zantaz, Inc.
925.598.3099 (w)

-Original Message-
From: Ofer vaknin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 6:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TSM with library & 1 drive
Importance: High

Hi all

1. do anybody know of any problems that TSM can not be install with IBM
library with 1 drive only, and must need 2 drives ?
2. is TSM can be install with IBM autoloader ,and how will it function ?

Thanks In Advance
Ofer Vaknin


**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.mimesweeper.com
**


This e-mail has been captured and archived by the ZANTAZ Digital Safe(tm)
service.  For more information, visit us at www.zantaz.com.
IMPORTANT: This electronic mail message is intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information
that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received
this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by
telephone or directly reply to the original message(s) sent.  Thank you.



Re: Temporary Backup

2002-07-17 Thread Gerald Wichmann

By creating a new management class with the appropriate retention settings
for the domain that node is assigned to, then on that node add an include
statement appropriately pointing to that managementclass..

e.g.

include /somefilesystem/.../* newmanagementclassname
include /somefilesystem/* newmanagementclassname

everything for that filesystem will use the retention settings of the new
mgmtclass.
Everything else will use the default management class.

Gerald Wichmann
Senior Systems Development Engineer
Zantaz, Inc.
925.598.3099 (w)

-Original Message-
From: Coats, Jack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 12:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Temporary Backup

I have one server that I need to backup everything except on file system on
like I do all my others.

Then I need to backup this ONE file system with a different retention than
everything else.
(like 10 days, where everything else is kept for 60 after it is deleted).

How should I set this up?

... TIA ... Jack


This e-mail has been captured and archived by the ZANTAZ Digital Safe(tm).
For more information, visit us at www.zantaz.com.
IMPORTANT: This electronic mail message is intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information
that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received
this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by
telephone or directly reply to the original message(s) sent.  Thank you.



Re: 15 domains into 3.

2002-07-17 Thread Gerald Wichmann

Nope.. whats the actual question though? Assigning your nodes to a different
domain isn't a big deal but you've got a lot of legwork to do to figure out
what each of your node's uses as management classes, what domains they are
assigned to, what all the in-use management classes are (and their
respecting copygroup settings), and then recreate that all in the new 3
domains such that when you DO reassign the node, it simply rebinds the data
and doesn't expire anything. Of course doing this is going to affect
EVERYTHING including schedules, option sets, etc etc.. so the main work is
just taking a comprehensive inventory of your server and planning it all out
beforehand.

Gerald Wichmann
Senior Systems Development Engineer
Zantaz, Inc.
925.598.3099 (w)

-Original Message-
From: Robert Molerio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 11:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 15 domains into 3.

Hi ADSM'ers,

Has anyone had to collapse 15 domains into a smaller number preserving the
attributes of the domains policy sets and mgmntclasses? I'm stucjk here and
need help.

Bob M.



solaris expert needed

2002-07-11 Thread Gerald Wichmann

Well I'm making progress but something is clearly still wrong. I started a
call with Tivoli but I'm waiting to hear back from them. If anyone see's
anything obvious that I'm doing wrong let me know as I'm not very good with
solaris specific device driver configuration:


bash-2.03# cat lb.conf | grep -v "#"
name="lb" class="scsi"
target=0 lun=0;
name="lb" class="scsi"
target=6 lun=1;
bash-2.03# cat mt.conf | grep -v "#"
   name="mt" class="scsi"
   target=1 lun=0;
   name="mt" class="scsi"
   target=2 lun=0;
bash-2.03# cat op.conf | grep -v "#"
name="op" class="scsi"
target=1 lun=0;
name="op" class="scsi"
target=2 lun=0;
name="op" class="scsi"
target=3 lun=0;
name="op" class="scsi"
target=4 lun=0;
name="op" class="scsi"
target=5 lun=0;
name="op" class="scsi"
target=6 lun=0;

name="op" class="scsi"
target=2 lun=1;
name="op" class="scsi"
target=3 lun=1;
name="op" class="scsi"
target=4 lun=1;
name="op" class="scsi"
target=5 lun=1;
bash-2.03# /usr/sbin/add_drv lb
devfsadm: driver failed to attach: lb
Warning: Driver (lb) successfully added to system but failed to attach
bash-2.03# /usr/sbin/add_drv mt
devfsadm: driver failed to attach: mt
Warning: Driver (mt) successfully added to system but failed to attach
bash-2.03# /usr/sbin/add_drv op
bash-2.03# ls /dev/rmt
0op   0opt  1op   1opt  2op   2opt  3op   3opt  4op   4opt  5op   5opt  6op
6opt  7op   7opt  8op   8opt  9op   9opt
bash-2.03#



Gerald Wichmann
Senior Systems Development Engineer
Zantaz, Inc.
925.598.3099 (w)



Re: solaris experts plz help

2002-07-11 Thread Gerald Wichmann

Yes that's actually a typo (the "lb" in places where it should be "op" or
"mt"). My conf files are correct in that sense (i.e. I wasn't
cutting/pasting them). The problem I'm having is I'm not sure how to
interpret what LUN a device is on or what the TARGET is by looking at the
output from probe-scsi-all..

Gerald Wichmann
Senior Systems Development Engineer
Zantaz, Inc.
925.598.3099 (w)

-Original Message-
From: Jozef Zatko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 1:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: solaris experts plz help

Hello Gerald,
you have to change your conf files like this:

lb.conf
if the scsi target and luns for your libraries are OK, you do not have to
change this file.

op.conf
replace all "lb" with "op" (in this file you define only optical drives,
not changer). For each optical drive create one stanza with correct target
and lun of each drive (so you will have 10 stanzas in your conf file).

Example

Name="op" class="scsi"
 Target=X lun=Y;

X is SCSI target ID of optical drive and Y is LUN of that drive

mt.conf
here replace "lb" with "mt" (in this file you define only tape drives, not
changer). For each tape drive create one stanza with correct target and
lun of each drive (so you will have 4 stanzas in your conf file).

Example

Name="mt" class="scsi"
 Target=X lun=Y;

X is SCSI target ID of tape drive and Y is LUN of that drive

Ing. Jozef Zatko
Login a.s.
Dlha 2, Stupava
tel.: (421) (2) 60252618




Gerald Wichmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
11.07.2002 01:14
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"


To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:solaris experts plz help


Below is the output of my server's probe-scsi-all.. I have 2 ATL M1500 LTO
libraries with 2 drives each, and one HP 1200ex optical library with 10
optical drives. I need to populate the "mt.conf", "lb.conf", and "op.conf"
files accordingly but what I've done doesn't seem to be working. When
doing
the add_drv command, it loads the device driver but then fails to attach.
When I do add_drv for "op" it works but I only get a "0op" and "1op" so
I'm
not sure why it didn't pick up 10 drives.

So my first question is, what do I put in the various conf files? I'm not
as
familiar with solaris so could use some help. Currently my files look like
this:

Lb.conf

  Name="lb" class="scsi"
Target=5 lun=0;
  Name="lb" class="scsi"
Target=4 lun=0;
  Name="lb" class="scsi"
Target=4 lun=1;

Op.conf

  Name="lb" class="scsi"
Target=4 lun=0;
  Name="lb" class="scsi"
Target=4 lun=1;

Mt.conf

  Name="lb" class="scsi"
Target=5 lun=0;
  Name="lb" class="scsi"
Target=4 lun=0;

Probe-scsi-all:

/pci@1f,2000/pci@1/scsi@5
Target 0
  Unit 0   Removable Medium changerM4 DATA MagFile 2.10
Target 1
  Unit 0   Removable Tape HP  Ultrium 1-SCSI  E15V
Target 2
  Unit 0   Removable Tape HP  Ultrium 1-SCSI  E15V

/pci@1f,2000/pci@1/scsi@4
Target 0
  Unit 0   Removable Medium changerM4 DATA MagFile 2.10
Target 1
  Unit 0   Removable Tape HP  Ultrium 1-SCSI  E15V
Target 2
  Unit 0   Removable Tape HP  Ultrium 1-SCSI  E15V

/pci@1f,4000/scsi@4,1
Target 2
  Unit 0   Removable Device type 7 HP  C1113J  1.10
Target 3
  Unit 0   Removable Device type 7 HP  C1113J  1.10
Target 4
  Unit 0   Removable Device type 7 HP  C1113J  1.10
Target 5
  Unit 0   Removable Device type 7 HP  C1113J  1.10
Target 6
  Unit 0   Removable Device type 8 HP  C1107J  1.40

/pci@1f,4000/scsi@4
Target 1
  Unit 0   Removable Device type 7 HP  C1113J  1.10
Target 2
  Unit 0   Removable Device type 7 HP  C1113J  1.10
Target 3
  Unit 0   Removable Device type 7 HP  C1113J  1.10
Target 4
  Unit 0   Removable Device type 7 HP  C1113J  1.10
Target 5
  Unit 0   Removable Device type 7 HP  C1113J  1.10
Target 6
  Unit 0   Removable Device type 7 HP  C1113J  1.10



Gerald Wichmann
Senior Systems Development Engineer
Zantaz, Inc.
925.598.3099 (w)



Re: TSM storage problem

2002-07-10 Thread Gerald Wichmann

I would imagine it should be fine installing it afterwards.. It should just
dump various "*.lic" files into the TSM server directory. The license files
are only available off the base cd.. i.e. 5.1.0, or 4.2.0, or whichever
version you have. If you download an update like 5.1.1, it doesn't include
the license files. That's why when you do a fresh install you always start
with the base level off the cd, then upgrade it with the update. So you get
the license files installed.

I'd first check if there are *.lic files in the directory and try licensing
it with the command below. If that doesn't work it probably wasn't
installed. If that doesn't work then next I would halt the TSM server (type
halt at TSM admin prompt or if you're using windows, stop the TSM server
service), install the license files, and then start the TSM server again (in
windows, the TSM server service). Then try registering it as below.

IF you're uncomfortable doing it you could always call Tivoli support and
have them walk you through it but it's pretty painless. Doubt you'd hurt
anything as TSM is pretty resilient.

Gerald Wichmann
Senior Systems Development Engineer
Zantaz, Inc.
925.598.3099 (w)

-Original Message-
From: Simeon Johnston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 2:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM storage problem

That's what I had thought also.  The people who set it up (set it up for
us while training us etc) said it didn't matter either.
If the licensing package was not installed can it be installed
afterwards?  There is an option to install the licensing package
(something like that.  It's not too clear on exactly what it's for) but
I don't want to screw up what I already have setup.

Even the sales rep that sold it to us said the licensing wasn't necessary.
Funky...

sim

Gerald Wichmann wrote:

>To my knowledge, licensing doesn't matter. I have had many servers in the
>past run for quite some time before I bothered licensing them and a server
>here that continues to run without registering the licenses. It gripes
about
>being uncompliant in the activity log however no functionality has been
>disabled. It will be interesting if indeed that's the problem as either I
>was wrong or Tivoli changed it and made licensing matter. The thing with
>licensing is all the license files are on the base cd so it doesn't really
>know whether you paid for them or not. It would be easy for you to check if
>this is your problem assuming you installed the license package/lpp's
simply
>by doing a "reg lic file=mgsyslan.lic number=1"  or however many you want
to
>license for the number parameter. Then do a "q lic" to see if it's
>compliant.
>
>But it does indeed look like that's your problem based on the definition of
>that ANR.. looks like you found your problem.
>
>



  1   2   3   >