Local Drive F: Ignored

2001-07-30 Thread Jennifer I. Moore

Gentle Greetings,

We have a puzzling problem with one of our nodes...  any help/insight would
be appreciated.

OS: WinNT 4
Client:  3.7.2.17

Manual backups through the GUI run fine...  all drives are listed under the
Local tree.

However, during automatic backups, the F: drive is completely
ignored...  no mention of it whatsoever...  not even an error message in
the error log.

Any ideas?

Thanks in advance,

Jennifer



Re: cloptset broken for Windows 4.1.2.X client

2001-04-10 Thread Jennifer I. Moore

Greetings,

We are running a test of Client Option Sets from an AIX server running TSM
4.1.2 and an NT 4.0 Workstation running TSM 4.1.2.12.  Things *seem* to be
behaving as expected with includes/excludes.

One that exists only on the server side is working to exclude the entire
D:drive.  This is set to force=yes, and it does override an include on the
client sode.  Incl/excl rules that exist on both server and client are
giving the expected duplicate error messages in the dsmerror.log (and the
files are being excluded).

My understanding from documentation is that specifying force=yes on server
side inclexcl options will process those includes/excludes *before* the
ones in the client side dsm.opt file.  And force=no will process them
after.  In effect, force=yes puts the server side rules at the "bottom" of
the include/exclude list and force=no puts them at the "top".

We are new at this, so this may not be entirely accurate information.  Just
wanted to share our experiences so far.

Thanks,
Jennifer

At 09:18 AM 4/10/2001, you wrote:
What if one has all of inclexcl statements defined in the client option set
and none in the dsm.opt file?

-Original Message-
From: Richard Sims [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 9:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: cloptset broken for Windows 4.1.2.X client


 Suad, did you specify force=yes (to override the options in the dsm.opt
 file)?

Note that INCLEXCL and DOMAIN are additive options such that
Force has no effect.  That is, Force pertains only to
singular options.


---

The information contained in this e-mail message, and any attachment
thereto, is confidential and may not be disclosed without our express
permission.  If you are not the intended recipient or an employee or agent
responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any
review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message, or any
attachment thereto, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited.  If you
have received this message in error, please immediately notify us by
telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the message and all of its
attachments.  Thank you.

Every effort is made to keep our network free from viruses.  You should,
however, check this e-mail message, as well as any attachment thereto, for
viruses.  We take no responsibility and have no liability for any computer
virus which may be transferred via this e-mail message.



Hung Admin Sessions

2001-02-23 Thread Jennifer I. Moore

Gentle Greetings,

Has anyone noticed any situations where Admin sessions on the server get
hung and become "ghost" sessions that will not go away?  Cancelling has no
effect.  Opening a separate Admin session and cancelling from there has no
effect.  In some cases, subsequent sessions get hung and a reboot is
necessary.  And in other cases, there seems to be no adverse side effects.

In this case, I was doing some SQL queries on the database, and two user
Admin sessions hung and two Query Admin sessions hung.  (Fortunately,
everything else is continuing to run smoothly.)  Below is the output from
"show threads" related to these 4 sessions.

We are running 4.1.2 Server on an IBM M80 running AIX 4.3.3.

Thank you in advance for any help and/or suggestions.

Jennifer


Thread 68: SessionThread
tid=4437, ktid=34577, ptid=52, det=1, zomb=0, join=0, result=0, sess=31636
  Awaiting cond 5c355b04 (mutex 301a65b0) at 10009b38 (outGetNext)

Thread 101: SessionThread
  tid=653d, ktid=69811, ptid=52, det=1, zomb=0, join=0, result=0, sess=31768
   Awaiting cond 5c33a484 (mutex 301a65b0) at 10009b38 (outGetNext)

Thread 105: SessionThread
  tid=6963, ktid=72547, ptid=52, det=1, zomb=0, join=0, result=0, sess=30446
   Awaiting cond 5c286354 (mutex 301a65b0) at 10009b38 (outGetNext)

Thread 108: SessionThread
  tid=6acf, ktid=52079, ptid=52, det=1, zomb=0, join=0, result=0, sess=31704
   Awaiting cond 5c1c69d4 (mutex 301a65b0) at 10009b38 (outGetNext)



Re: Client v4.1.2 -- Uninstall on NT results in blank desktop?

2001-01-11 Thread Jennifer I. Moore

Hi Tim,

Yes, this is what we are seeing.  And, in fact, I read the whole
README...  and even remember now reading this part.  Guess it was a long
day.  My apologies to the list for sending unnecessary mail.  And thank you
Tim for bringing this back to my attention.

Do you know if it is targetted to be fixed in future patches or
releases?  The obvious concern is that it may cause confusion for our user
population.

Thanks!

Jennifer

At 06:27 PM 1/9/2001, you wrote:
The following is in the readme:

- IMPORTANT NOTE REGARDING A KNOWN UNINSTALL ISSUE:

 - Issue: Grey desktop on uninstall. There is an issue that has been
   seen on some systems with Active Desktop installed. The symptoms
   are that after an uninstall the desktop will turn grey and the
   desktop icons will not be visible.  The system will continue to work
   otherwise. The desktop is restored as soon as you log off and log
   back on.  The problem is that Installshield will attempt to remove
   the All Users desktop folder if the TSM desktop icons are the only
   items in the folder. The problem is that the desktop folder is a
   protected system folder and can't be removed.  This issue will be
   addressed in the future. For now, if you see this problem, simply
   log off and log back on to reset the desktop.

Is this what you are experiencing?

Tim Rushforth
City of Winnipeg
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Jennifer I. Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 4:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Client v4.1.2 -- Uninstall on NT results in blank desktop?


Gentle Greetings,

We've noticed a strange behavior when uninstalling TSM client v4.1.2 on an
NT 4.0 Workstation system (SP5).  When the Add/Remove Programs process
finishes, the desktop goes to a blank grey screen with only the Start menu
and Task Bar showing.  Right-clicking in the grey area results in a Desktop
message as follows:

C:\WINNT\Profiles\All Users\Desktop is not accessible.  Access is
denied.  Retry.  Cancel.

Retry results in the same message.  Cancel returns to the blank grey
screen.  The only way we've found to get out of this is to restart the
machine.  (Fortunately, the Start menu still works fine, so it's not
necessary to be brutal about the restart.)

Has anyone else noticed this behavior?

Thank you in advance for any help, information, and/or shared experiences.

Jennifer



Re: Custom dsm.opt in Client v4.1.2

2001-01-11 Thread Jennifer I. Moore

Hi Arthur,

Thanks for sharing your experiences with this.  It's good to know that
there's already a PMR open on it (or did they close it?).

We also tried downloading the files multiple times to clear any potential
for corruption.  But with no success.

Being able to include these custom pieces in previous versions has been a
fabulous help!  I hope it's possible to iron out the wrinkles that seem to
be popping up here and there (apparently not across the board though) in
the case of v4.1.2.

Thanks again!

Jennifer

At 10:27 AM 1/10/2001, you wrote:
Hi Tim,

We built an SMS package for the install. After we realized the the files
were not being copied over, we added an extra command to force this step.

As I mentioned, I called Tivoli (PMR 19101, 23e) but was told that their
testing didn't show any problems with this. AND, I was told that the client
files may have been corrupted while I was downloading them. I downloaded the
6 files again, but the problem remained.

Thanks.


-Original Message-
From: Rushforth, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 10:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Custom dsm.opt in Client v4.1.2


Hi Arthur:

Were you using Group Policy?
Did you open a problem with Tivoli?  If so is there an APAR on this?

I was not sure if Tivoli would treat this as a problem or a design request -
I was going to try as a problem but if you already have one open ...

Another feature we would like to see is the ability to install the Web
Client Service and Schedule Service via Group Policy Software Installation.
Then it would be a totally automated installation.


Thanks,

Tim Rushforth
City of Winnipeg
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: Kleynerman, Arthur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 8:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Custom dsm.opt in Client v4.1.2


We had the same problem. After calling Tivoli, I was told that I was the
only one who complained about this. Apparently no one else has.

Our workaround was to manually copy the predefined dsm.opt file into the
baclient directory during the installation.

Arthur.

-Original Message-
From: Rushforth, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 5:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Custom dsm.opt in Client v4.1.2


I have installed a predefined dsm.opt file, when installing TSM 4.1.2 on
Windows 2000 that has not had the client previously installed.  Placed
dsm.opt in the ..\config directory and ran setup.

If you are using W2K Group Policy to install the client (again on a "clean"
server), I have found that it does not use the custom dsm.opt file.  Ditto
if you just run "Tivoli Storage Manager Client.msi".

How were you installing the client?

Tim Rushforth
City of Winnipeg
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


---

The information contained in this e-mail message, and any attachment
thereto, is confidential and may not be disclosed without our express
permission.  If you are not the intended recipient or an employee or agent
responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any
review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message, or any
attachment thereto, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited.  If you
have received this message in error, please immediately notify us by
telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the message and all of its
attachments.  Thank you.

Every effort is made to keep our network free from viruses.  You should,
however, check this e-mail message, as well as any attachment thereto, for
viruses.  We take no responsibility and have no liability for any computer
virus which may be transferred via this e-mail message.



Custom dsm.opt in Client v4.1.2

2001-01-09 Thread Jennifer I. Moore

Gentle Greetings,

Has anyone yet succeeded in installing a predefined (custom) dsm.opt file
with TSM client version 4.1.2?  So far all of our attempts have
failed...  the installer seems to ignore anything I put in the ...\config
folder.

I have read and tried to follow the instructions in the README that came
with 4.1.2, though I have some concern that the path referenced there does
not reflect the path to the config folder after extracting the files from
the 4.1.2 installer exe.  It looks more like the path that was used in
previous versions.  So I wonder if this process works in this version.

Thank you in advance for any help, suggestions, and/or shared experiences.

Jennifer



Client v4.1.2 -- Uninstall on NT results in blank desktop?

2001-01-09 Thread Jennifer I. Moore

Gentle Greetings,

We've noticed a strange behavior when uninstalling TSM client v4.1.2 on an
NT 4.0 Workstation system (SP5).  When the Add/Remove Programs process
finishes, the desktop goes to a blank grey screen with only the Start menu
and Task Bar showing.  Right-clicking in the grey area results in a Desktop
message as follows:

C:\WINNT\Profiles\All Users\Desktop is not accessible.  Access is
denied.  Retry.  Cancel.

Retry results in the same message.  Cancel returns to the blank grey
screen.  The only way we've found to get out of this is to restart the
machine.  (Fortunately, the Start menu still works fine, so it's not
necessary to be brutal about the restart.)

Has anyone else noticed this behavior?

Thank you in advance for any help, information, and/or shared experiences.

Jennifer