Protocol error, Please help
All, I am trying to resolve this common error, whenever I do an install, the system gives me this, ad I have to go reset the password , though the install takes the password correctly. Please advise ANR0444W Protocol error on session 79236 for node A35676 (WinNT) - out-of-sequence verb (type SignOff) received. 01/05/2007 13:14:04 ANR0484W Session 79236 for node A35676 (WinNT) terminated - protocol violation detected. Jeremy Cloward Netbackup / Tivoli Storage Manager Support desk 614-677-0317 cell 614-374-4937 3-25-01
Re: Days Since Last Access
Yeah, I am in the same boat, I have too many nodes that do not backup, anbd no way to know unless I look in the failure report that gets e mailed out. Best thing to do is check the filesystem and see the last time It was accessed and backed up, the hitting the server info means meta data was sent and the system said yeah Im here, its the filesystem that tells you what is really going on. Jeremy Friday, November 10, 2006 1:32 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc: From: "Kauffman, Tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Days Since Last Access We had a system that was connecting to the server 4 times a day, so last access was always less than 1. I crashed and burned, got rebuilt -- and the most recent backup was 15 months old. And I *still* can't get the NT admins to check the logs on any regular basis. Tom Kauffman NIBCO, Inc -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Prather, Wanda Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 12:17 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Days Since Last Access "Days since last access" just tells you the last time there was communication between the client and the server. It doesn't tell you anything about whether the client was backed up, or not. The communication could have been a single restore; or it could be the client scheduler just checking for a backup time. Or you could have a client backup that started, but did not complete successfully. To verify whether the client has been successfully backed up, look at q filespace nodename f=d Look for the "last backup end" date for each client filesystem to see when it last backed up. Wanda Prather "I/O, I/O, It's all about I/O" -(me) -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Avy Wong Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 11:52 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Days Since Last Access hello, When I do a q node to find out what nodes are being backed up, I see that "<1" means it is being backed up properly. But at times I see "1" , "2", "3" .." some big number " without "<" attached to it , my question is what is the definitive number to say it is still being backed up without digging through the details I have been told that "1" .. up to "3" is still ok. Thank you for clarifying. Node Name Platform Policy Domain Days Since Days Since Locked? Name Last AccessPassword Set - -- --- --- DAT03TEST WinNTSTANDARD <1 235No EOSNOTE1WinNTSTANDARD1 240 No ESSMOC04 WinNTSTANDARD 653 855 No Avy Wong Business Continuity Administrator Mohegan Sun 1 Mohegan Sun Blvd Uncasville, CT 06382 ext 28164 ** The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copy of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. ** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance upon this message. If you have received this in error, please notify us immediately by return email and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message.
Re: tsm not recognizing tape unit
Mario, and Doug, This is almost identical to the AIX version of it all, though I dont use windows, I am not surprised to see that you have to do it the same way. TSM has to control EVERYTHING it touches. If you have it kick up the drivers on boot in AIX, then windows would be the same, IBM has said in training it will have all the same rules between windows and AIX. As far as win2k, or 2003 , you wont see much of a difference. That much I do know about windows. Let me know if it still does not work. Jeremy -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thorneycroft, Doug Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 4:10 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] tsm not recognizing tape unit Yes, it does, you also have to enable Windows 2000 and Optical Device Support. This is on a WIN2k Server, Running TSM ver. 5.2 I don't know if it is different on Win2003 or for TSM Ver 5.3, Check the admin guide. The following is copied from the 5.2 admin Guide. Under the heading: "Controlling All Devices with the IBM Tivoli Storage Manager Device Driver" >From the Tivoli Storage Manager Console: 1. From the Tivoli Storage Manager Console, expand the tree to Tivoli Storage Manager Device Driver for the machine that you are configuring. 2. Expand TSM Device Driver and Reports. 3. Click Service Information in the IBM Tivoli Storage Manager Console tree. The Service Information window appears in the right panel. 4. Right click IBM Tivoli Storage Manager Device Driver. A pop-up menu appears. 5. Click Properties in the pop-up menu. The Device Driver Options dialog appears. 6. Click to check the Enable Windows 2000 and Optical Device Support check box. The startup type is set to Boot as a default. 7. Click OK. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mario Behring Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 12:48 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: tsm not recognizing tape unit No. But, just out of curiosity, is there any difference if it is started at boot time or not ? Mario - Original Message From: "Thorneycroft, Doug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 4:38:52 PM Subject: Re: tsm not recognizing tape unit Do you have your TSM device driver set to start at boot? -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mario Behring Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 11:58 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: tsm not recognizing tape unit Richard, The device is connected to a SCSI 160 and is being recognized by the SCSI interface during the boot process. Windows 2000 also recognizes the unit. I am updating the firmware and returning the driver to the version you have pointed. The Windows RSM service is disabledbut, what about the TSM Device Driver component? Should I install it? I´ve tried with and without it.some notes at the Admin Guide are saying that I can do either way. Please advise. Mario - Original Message From: Richard van Denzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 4:17:14 AM Subject: Re: tsm not recognizing tape unit Hi Mario, Guessing from your notes, you have ran the install.exe that comes with the driver. The driver you are using is not the latest (6.1.3.8 is). Have you tried using an older driver like 6.0.8.2 (I can e-mail it if you don't have it)? What FW has the LTO3 drive, if not the latest have you tries upgrading the FW on the drive? Is the drive visible on the HBA (Fibre or SCSI) during the BIOS part of the boot process? Is the HBA at a supported FW level? If the HBA is a SCSI-320? If so, have you tried setting it to 160, there is an issue when the drive or library is on a 320 channel. Is the drive visible under W2K? Met vriendelijke groet, with kind regards, Richard van Denzel -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Mario Behring Verzonden: dinsdag 10 oktober 2006 22:45 Aan: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Onderwerp: [ADSM-L] tsm not recognizing tape unit Hi list, I have the following environment: TSM 5.3.2 Server running on a W2K box IBM ULTRIUM III LTO 3580 connected via SCSI I´ve installed the windows certified driver downloaded from the ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/storage/devdrvr/Windows/Win2000/Latest/ and ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/storage/devdrvr/Windows/Win2000/LTO_WHQL_Cert.. ...I´ve tried both versions...looks like that only the certified one works.the install output is below: Running installation application, version 6.1.3.5. Preparing system for driver installation... Uninstalling existing tape drives... Existing tape drives successfully uninstalled. Installing/updating the tape bus enumerator... Successfully installed/updated the tape bus enumerator. Installing driver for tape drives... Driv
Re: tsm not recognizing tape unit
Mario, I was just going to ask, Is the driver running. In unix (I dont know anything about windows, sorry) but it has to say, a driver is attached and running to a device, (even if its through an HBA or something) AIX is pretty tempermental about that, drivers need to be running and seen as attatched, or your not going to have anything work. I assume windows is similar, So yeah, Echo doug on this one, make sure its up and running b4 TSM itself tries to do anything. Jeremy -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thorneycroft, Doug Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 3:39 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] tsm not recognizing tape unit Do you have your TSM device driver set to start at boot? -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mario Behring Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 11:58 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: tsm not recognizing tape unit Richard, The device is connected to a SCSI 160 and is being recognized by the SCSI interface during the boot process. Windows 2000 also recognizes the unit. I am updating the firmware and returning the driver to the version you have pointed. The Windows RSM service is disabledbut, what about the TSM Device Driver component? Should I install it? I´ve tried with and without it.some notes at the Admin Guide are saying that I can do either way. Please advise. Mario - Original Message From: Richard van Denzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 4:17:14 AM Subject: Re: tsm not recognizing tape unit Hi Mario, Guessing from your notes, you have ran the install.exe that comes with the driver. The driver you are using is not the latest (6.1.3.8 is). Have you tried using an older driver like 6.0.8.2 (I can e-mail it if you don't have it)? What FW has the LTO3 drive, if not the latest have you tries upgrading the FW on the drive? Is the drive visible on the HBA (Fibre or SCSI) during the BIOS part of the boot process? Is the HBA at a supported FW level? If the HBA is a SCSI-320? If so, have you tried setting it to 160, there is an issue when the drive or library is on a 320 channel. Is the drive visible under W2K? Met vriendelijke groet, with kind regards, Richard van Denzel -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Mario Behring Verzonden: dinsdag 10 oktober 2006 22:45 Aan: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Onderwerp: [ADSM-L] tsm not recognizing tape unit Hi list, I have the following environment: TSM 5.3.2 Server running on a W2K box IBM ULTRIUM III LTO 3580 connected via SCSI I´ve installed the windows certified driver downloaded from the ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/storage/devdrvr/Windows/Win2000/Latest/ and ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/storage/devdrvr/Windows/Win2000/LTO_WHQL_Cert.. ...I´ve tried both versions...looks like that only the certified one works.the install output is below: Running installation application, version 6.1.3.5. Preparing system for driver installation... Uninstalling existing tape drives... Existing tape drives successfully uninstalled. Installing/updating the tape bus enumerator... Successfully installed/updated the tape bus enumerator. Installing driver for tape drives... Driver for tape drives installed. Program successful. I´ve also disabled the Windows Removable Storage service. Unfortunatelly TSM does not recognize the tape unit. I´ve tried this with and without the TSM Device Driver. Looks like TSM Device Driver does not support the IBM LTO Ultrium tape unitsThe output from the tsmdlst command is as follows: >tsmdlst Tivoli Storage Manager -- Device List Utility Licensed Materials - Property of IBM 5697-TSM (C) Copyright IBM Corporation 2000, 2005. All rights reserved. U.S. Government Users Restricted Rights - Use, duplication or disclosure restricted by GSA ADP Schedule Contract with IBM Corporation. Computer Name: TIVOLI OS Version: 5.0 OS Build #: 2195 TSM Device Driver: ADSMScsi - Not Running No HBAs were detected. Reason: Unable to load HBA vendor library. TSM Name ID LUN Bus Port SSNWWN TSM Type Device Identifier -- -- mt6.0.0.26002- - LTO IBM ULT3580-T D3 57F7 Completed in: 0 days, 0 hours, 0 minutes, 1 seconds. I am not sure about what´s going on..any help is appreciated. Thanks Mario
Re: tsm not recognizing tape unit
Mario, >From my experience, TSM is very uptight, it has to be in controll of every aspect of what it touches, otherwise it will sit and pout. I recommend you run it from the TSM device driver component, it at least provides consistancy with your environment, its a pain, but it works that way. Jeremy -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 2:58 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] tsm not recognizing tape unit Richard, The device is connected to a SCSI 160 and is being recognized by the SCSI interface during the boot process. Windows 2000 also recognizes the unit. I am updating the firmware and returning the driver to the version you have pointed. The Windows RSM service is disabledbut, what about the TSM Device Driver component? Should I install it? I´ve tried with and without it.some notes at the Admin Guide are saying that I can do either way. Please advise. Mario - Original Message From: Richard van Denzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 4:17:14 AM Subject: Re: tsm not recognizing tape unit Hi Mario, Guessing from your notes, you have ran the install.exe that comes with the driver. The driver you are using is not the latest (6.1.3.8 is). Have you tried using an older driver like 6.0.8.2 (I can e-mail it if you don't have it)? What FW has the LTO3 drive, if not the latest have you tries upgrading the FW on the drive? Is the drive visible on the HBA (Fibre or SCSI) during the BIOS part of the boot process? Is the HBA at a supported FW level? If the HBA is a SCSI-320? If so, have you tried setting it to 160, there is an issue when the drive or library is on a 320 channel. Is the drive visible under W2K? Met vriendelijke groet, with kind regards, Richard van Denzel -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Mario Behring Verzonden: dinsdag 10 oktober 2006 22:45 Aan: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Onderwerp: [ADSM-L] tsm not recognizing tape unit Hi list, I have the following environment: TSM 5.3.2 Server running on a W2K box IBM ULTRIUM III LTO 3580 connected via SCSI I´ve installed the windows certified driver downloaded from the ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/storage/devdrvr/Windows/Win2000/Latest/ and ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/storage/devdrvr/Windows/Win2000/LTO_WHQL_Cert.. ...I´ve tried both versions...looks like that only the certified one works.the install output is below: Running installation application, version 6.1.3.5. Preparing system for driver installation... Uninstalling existing tape drives... Existing tape drives successfully uninstalled. Installing/updating the tape bus enumerator... Successfully installed/updated the tape bus enumerator. Installing driver for tape drives... Driver for tape drives installed. Program successful. I´ve also disabled the Windows Removable Storage service. Unfortunatelly TSM does not recognize the tape unit. I´ve tried this with and without the TSM Device Driver. Looks like TSM Device Driver does not support the IBM LTO Ultrium tape unitsThe output from the tsmdlst command is as follows: >tsmdlst Tivoli Storage Manager -- Device List Utility Licensed Materials - Property of IBM 5697-TSM (C) Copyright IBM Corporation 2000, 2005. All rights reserved. U.S. Government Users Restricted Rights - Use, duplication or disclosure restricted by GSA ADP Schedule Contract with IBM Corporation. Computer Name: TIVOLI OS Version: 5.0 OS Build #: 2195 TSM Device Driver: ADSMScsi - Not Running No HBAs were detected. Reason: Unable to load HBA vendor library. TSM Name ID LUN Bus Port SSNWWN TSM Type Device Identifier -- -- mt6.0.0.26002- - LTO IBM ULT3580-T D3 57F7 Completed in: 0 days, 0 hours, 0 minutes, 1 seconds. I am not sure about what´s going on..any help is appreciated. Thanks Mario
Re: Going back to TSM V5.2 after attempting an upgrade to V5.3
Brenda, I have had nightmares in the switch over with 5.2, and 5.3 in the z/os. You can get both of them to backup, but you might have problems doing restores if you are on 5.3, and want to do a restore of a backup that was done in 5.2, why ? I have no idea, I have a strange configuration here in the support matrix. Just passing some info on . Jeremy -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 2:29 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] Going back to TSM V5.2 after attempting an upgrade to V5.3 We are in the process of preparing to upgrade our TSM V5.2.4 Server to a TSM V5.3.2 server on z/OS. I hopefully have the steps down to perform the upgrade. It looks to me like we just need to upgrade our DB. Has anyone had trouble with the DB upgrade and had to restore back to TSM V5.2.4? If so, what steps did you go through to get back to TSM V5.2.4? Sorry if this questions has been asked before, but I was recently given the assignment to manage our TSM environment. Regards, Brenda Stephenson
Re: TSM 5.3 with AIX 5.3 TCP/Ip Failure
Murgan, Start at the beginning, is there conectivity between them, 2nd is the ADSM client service runnung? -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 25, 2006 4:05 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] TSM 5.3 with AIX 5.3 TCP/Ip Failure Dear all, I configured the tsm client 5.3 on the Aix 5.3 machine, after I got the error messages as follows "ANS2610S TCP/IP communications failure between the client and the server machine" How can I resolve this problem, Can anyone help me out in this regard. Regards, Murugan DISCLAIMER: This email (including any attachments) is intended for the sole use of the intended recipient/s and may contain material that is CONFIDENTIAL AND PRIVATE COMPANY INFORMATION. Any review or reliance by others or copying or distribution or forwarding of any or all of the contents in this message is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email and delete all copies; your cooperation in this regard is appreciated.
Re: Migration TSM 5.1 at 5.3
Ive done it, Lay down 5.2 first, or you are in for a world of hurt. Jeremy Cloward "In this golden age of communication , means everyone talks at the same time" Justin Sullivan TSM User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 08/16/2006 01:38 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" From TSM User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc Subject [ADSM-L] Migration TSM 5.1 at 5.3 Good afternoon to all I need migrate a server TSM 5.1 at 5.3. Did somebody already make it? Some suggestion or indication? Thank you
Re: Réf. : Re: [ADSM-L] tape content with backup date
Salut Vincent, there is a way to access the SQL tables, you need the interface called ODBC, you can use that , with MS excell to go and poll the database for pretty much anything. I have to use it cause my Version of ADSM is on a VM server that has not been updated since 96, ODBC is a lifesaver. Au tous, Jeremy -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 11:13 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] Réf. : Re: [ADSM-L] tape content with backup date Thank's Alexander for your help Do you know a solution to have direct access to the TSM tables, or do I have to forget it ? Any IBM tech guy around here to confirm if it is or not possible to get the results ? Regards Vince Alexander Verkooijen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envoyé par : "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 26/06/06 16:02 Veuillez répondre à "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" Pour : ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc :(ccc : Vincent RATAJSZCZAK/INFOGER/GRT/FR) Objet : Re: [ADSM-L] tape content with backup date If you had access to the *real* tables that reside in the TSM databse then, yes, it would be possible. Since the SQL interface only provides access to *pseudo* tables I don't think it's possible. Please correct me if I'm wrong. In the past there have been times when I could have used a list like this. Regards, Alexander Alexander Verkooijen Senior Systems Programmer High Performance Computing SARA Computing & Networking Services > -Original Message- > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Vincent RATAJSZCZAK > Sent: donderdag 22 juni 2006 18:07 > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU > Subject: tape content with backup date > > Dear lovely TSM World, > > I have a special request for you... > > I would like to list the content of a specific tape (destroyed) with a > column with the backuped date of the objet. > > ==> "Q content XXX" is poor > > ==> "select * from contents where volume_name=" give me > Node_name/File_name, but no backuped date > > ==> "select * from backups" give me Node_name/File_name and backuped > date, but no tape affectation > > > Between the 2nd and 3rd, I can't find a common field to join the > tables > > > Anyone could help me please ? > > Do you think it's possible ? > > The restore GUI show you the file name and backuped date, so I think > YES, but > > Thank's > > Vince >
Database query
All, I am running the latest 3.4 on VM sitting on a mainframe. I need to run an all enclusive query, and I am not sure how far my skills will go with this. I tried the database interface through excell, and it is taking hours, and tying up all my resources. I want to be able to parse for a report that tells me from the command line to spit out to an excell spreadsheet the amount of data backed up in 3 months, how many nodes are in there, backing up and how much for each node. Any ideas will help, Jeremy Cloward Netbackup / Tivoli Storage Manager Support desk 614-677-0317 cell 614-374-4937 3-25-01
Re: Quantum DX30 virtual tape library - cartridge sizing
I did professional services for that library, the best practices I found that worked were 32 200GB tapes. Never had any problems at that level. Hope that helps. jeremy -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thorneycroft, Doug Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 3:49 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] Quantum DX30 virtual tape library - cartridge sizing I just had a Quantum DX30 VTL installed last week. the configured available storage is 5.11 TB. the installer set the cartridge size to 35 GB. which gave me 136 35 GB dlt carts for a total of 4.65 TB. meaning that almost 500GB of disk space is unused. Quantum support suggest using a larger cartridge size, but didn't give any suggestions for what would be optimal. Is anyone else using a DX30 (16X400 GB drives)? If so, what cartridge size are you using, and how many carts did the system give you? Doug Thorneycroft > Systems Analyst > County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County > 1955 Workman Mill Road > Whittier, CA 90601 > Tel: (562)699-7411, Ext. 1058 > Fax:(562)695-6756 > www.lacsd.org > > >
Re: TSM Server 5.2.3 (win 2003) service start problem
Szymon, This is a regular hex file output, its written assembler language, I ran it as far as I could, you are orking with libraries that I am not familiar with. basically, you need a good psychiatrist if you know what this stuff all means. You are having memory clashes with some other processes that TSM does not do well with running, and sharing memory with. I dont think this is a tsm problem, meaning you have something wrong in TSM, its crossing with something else running. Beyond that, GABBA GABBA HEY Friday, April 28, 2006 12:58 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc: From: Szymon Kacprzak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM Server 5.2.3 (win 2003) service start problem Wiadomosc przeskanowana programem antywirusowym. Nie znaleziono wirusow / This message was anti-virus scanned. No viruses were found. I'm not sure about the reason of error. I think it's a TSM crash, because OS is working without errors. I extended my recovery log and create additional, but it didn't help. This is a piece of dsmserv.err: Exception generated: 04/27/2006 16:33:05 Module name: Unavailable Current version: 5.2.3.0 Build date: Jun 21 2004 16:50:40 Build Type: 32Bit Exception generated: 04/27/2006 17:47:54 Module name: Unavailable Current version: 5.2.3.0 Build date: Jun 21 2004 16:50:40 Build Type: 32Bit Crash dump file: C:\Program Files\Tivoli\tsm\server\dsmserv.dmp Exception code: E001 (Unknown) at 001B:7C815DEA Registers: EAX=0012BFB4 EBX=0001 ECX=001A7498 EDX= ESI= EDI=003B EBP=0012C004 ESP=0012BFB0 EIP=7C815DEA FLG=0246 CS =001B DS =0023 SS =0023 ES =0023 FS =003B GS = Call stack: Address Parameters F()+Offset, File(Line#) 7C815DEA (0xE001 0x 0x 0x) RaiseException()+3C, Unavailable 1000665D (0x 0x 0x 0x) pkLogicAbort()+4D, Unavailable Exception handler complete. RC: 487 Exception generated: 04/28/2006 10:42:14 Module name: Unavailable Current version: 5 .2.3.0 Build date: Jun 21 2004 16:50:40 Build Type: 32Bit Crash dump file: C:\PROGRA~1\Tivoli\tsm\server\dsmserv.dmp Exception code: E001 (Unknown) at 001B:7C815DEA Registers: EAX=0012BFB4 EBX=0001 ECX=001A7398 EDX= ESI= EDI=003B EBP=0012C004 ESP=0012BFB0 EIP=7C815DEA FLG=0246 CS =001B DS =0023 SS =0023 ES =0023 FS =003B Regarding Szymon Kacprzak Richard Sims <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM:To Dist Stor ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Manager" cc <[EMAIL PROTECTED] .EDU> Subject Re: [ADSM-L] TSM Server 5.2.3 (win 2003) service start problem 2006-04-28 14:20 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] .EDU> Wiadomosc przeskanowana programem antywirusowym. Nie znaleziono wirusow / This message was anti-virus scanned. No viruses were found. On Apr 28, 2006, at 5:48 AM, Szymon Kacprzak wrote: > ... > ANRD pkthread.c(835): ThreadId<0> Run-time assertion failed: > "Cmp64( > scanLsn, LOGV->headLsn ) != GREATERTHAN", Thread 0, File logread.c, > Line > 395. ... Szymon - It appears that you have Log Sequence Number inconsistencies in your TSM Recovery Log which is thwarting the restart in roll-forward mode. You don't say why you're in this situation, or if you have TSM mirroring configured, but there may have been a TSM or OS crash which created a mess. If it was a TSM crash, see if there is a dsmserv.err file with info about the event. I don't think that extending the Recovery Log would serve as a remedy for this; and your log size is large already. I would recommend contacting TSM Support for guidance on resolving this. You may have to end up restarting without the Recovery Log data, and face losing some updates. Richard Sims
Schedules missed, no reason
All, I am running 3.4 on the VM mainframe . I dont know if that will be the issue here, but. I have multiple machines missing thier scheduled times , for no reason, they are associated with a schedule, they have a management class, everything , but they dont kick off or do anything. # hours later I will get a message saying that it missed its scheduled backup time ANR2578I Schedule 10AM_ANYDAY in domain WORKSTATION_2X30_2X90 for node NW637403 has missed its scheduled start up window. ANR2578I Schedule 10AM_ANYDAY in domain WORKSTATION_2X30_2X90 for node NW826260 has missed its scheduled start up window. ANR2578I Schedule 10AM_WEEKDAY in domain WORKSTATION_2X30_2X90 for node NW828435 has missed its scheduled start up window. ANR2578I Schedule 10AM_WEEKDAY in domain WORKSTATION_2X30_2X90 for node NW818789 has missed its scheduled start up window. Anyone have any ideas? ? ? Grazzi Jeremy Cloward "In this golden age of communication , means everyone talks at the same time" Justin Sullivan
Poll for error question
Good day All , I am using 3.4 on VM server , clients are about that old too. (I know, you all first advise to get something for the current millennium, Im working on that ) I am finding multiple instances where unregistered nodes contact the server and try to back up, I see them in console mode, but I don't know how many I am actually getting. Is there a command I can run where I poll the actlog for occurrences of this say for the last week? I just inherited this one, and I know some newer versions of TSM, but this one is beyond me. Any help is more than appreciated. Jeremy Cloward "In this golden age of communication , means everyone talks at the same time" Justin Sullivan
DSM.opt file issues
Hi all., I have this DSM opt issue, I edited this one to backup only the drives locally, and it still goes out and backs up the stuff on the mapped drives. This is getting expensive to the customer, and I need to figure out why it does not do as the file directs. here is the DSM.opt file I am working with. Any ideas would be helpful. Thanks ** * IBM Adstar Distributed Storage Manager * ** *NodeName * Windows NT clients: Remove the asterisk from column one of the BACKUPREG option * if the registry should be backedup during incremental backups. BACKUPREGISTRY NO SKIPNTPERMISSIONS YES * * tcp/ip * * TCPPort * * +--+--+ * | TCPPort | port_addr| * +--+--+ * Default: 1500 * * Option file example: * commmethod TCPIP * tcpserveraddress 165.77.100.3 tcpserveraddress ADSM01.ENT.NWIE.NET f * DOMain Domain ALL-LOCAL * EXclude and INclude * * +--+--+ * | EXclude | pattern | * +--+--+ * | INclude | pattern | * +--+--+ * *Include *:\...\*.* *Include *:\...\* * Default: BACKUP ONLY NEEDED FILES * * If you want to backup ALL DATA, do the following: *Remove the asterisk "*" in front of the previous 2 "Include" lines *Insert an asterisk "*" in front of the following "Include" and "Exclude" lines *Save the file Exclude *:\...\*.* Exclude *:\...\* Include "c:\Winnt\Profiles\...\Personal\*" Include "c:\Winnt\Profiles\...\Personal\*.*" Include "c:\Winnt\Profiles\...\Personal\...\*" Include "c:\Winnt\Profiles\...\Personal\...\*.*" Include "c:\Winnt\Documents and Settings\...\My Documents\*" Include "c:\Winnt\Documents and Settings\...\My Documents\*.*" Include "c:\Winnt\Documents and Settings\...\My Documents\...\*" Include "c:\Winnt\Documents and Settings\...\My Documents\...\*.*" Include "c:\Documents and Settings\...\My Documents\*" Include "c:\Documents and Settings\...\My Documents\*.*" Include "c:\Documents and Settings\...\My Documents\...\*" Include "c:\Documents and Settings\...\My Documents\...\*.*" Include "c:\Documents and Settings\...\Desktop\*" Include "c:\Documents and Settings\...\Desktop\*.*" Include "c:\Documents and Settings\...\Desktop\...\*" Include "c:\Documents and Settings\...\Desktop\...\*.*" Include "c:\Documents and Settings\...\Favorites\*" Include "c:\Documents and Settings\...\Favorites\*.*" Include "c:\Documents and Settings\...\Favorites\...\*" Include "c:\Documents and Settings\...\Favorites\...\*.*" Include "c:\My Documents\*" Include "c:\My Documents\*.*" Include "c:\My Documents\...\*" Include "c:\My Documents\...\*.*" Include "c:\My Files\*" Include "c:\My Files\*.*" Include "c:\My Files\...\*" Include "c:\My Files\...\*.*" Include c:\...\desktop*.dsk Include c:\...\notes*.ini Include c:\...\*.nsf Include "c:\...\notes\data\*" Include "c:\...\notes\data\*.*" Include c:\...\*.opt * REPlace * * +--+--+ * | REPlace | Yes|No|Prompt| * +--+--+ * System default: Prompt * * Option file example: * * REPlace N * REPlace Y * SUbdir SUBDIR YES * passwordaccess generate TAPEPROMPT NO SCHEDLOGRETENTION 10 D ERRORLOGRETENTION 10 D Jeremy Cloward "In this golden age of communication , means everyone talks at the same time" Justin Sullivan
Re: Library status Unknown
Gil, I think what the issue is, I have seen this b4 anyway, is that though the OS can see the device, if it wasn't configured through the TSM server, using the TSM version of the drivers, it is not going to play well with the other kids. It could be that the other 2 were not installed through the TSM interface using those drivers. Thats just my guess. Jeremy Cloward "In this golden age of communication , means everyone talks at the same time" Justin Sullivan "Gill, Geoffrey L." "Gill, Geoffrey L." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: To "ADSM: Dist ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Stor Manager"cc <[EMAIL PROTECTED] RIST.EDU> Subject [ADSM-L] Library status Unknown 04/18/2006 01:16 AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] RIST.EDU> Why would the library status show "Unknown" (blue) when there seems to be no issue with it on the control panel or through communications, at least as far as I can tell. Thanks, Geoff Gill TSM Administrator PeopleSoft Sr. Systems Administrator SAIC M/S-G1b (858)826-4062 Email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
