Unity Storage

[Kamp, Bruce (Ext)]

Is anyone doing NDMP backups of Unity storage?



Thanks,
Bruce Kamp
Source One Technical
Providing services for Novartis Backup & Recovery
T +18175687331
bruce.k...@novartis.com

US Fort  Worth (USFW)
7001 Calmont Ave.
Fort Worth, TX  76244
USA

Occupancy Report

[Kamp, Bruce (Ext)]

I have been asked to come up with a report to show the occupancy by node & by 
retention time.

Region

Site

TSM Server

Hostname/
NodeName

Total Occupancy all Retention Schedules (MB)

Capacity by retention < 12 Months

Capacity by retention
> 12 Months < 24 Months

Capacity retention
36 Months

Capacity Retention
48 Months

Capacity Retention
60 Months

Capacity Retention
72 Months

Capacity Retention
84 Months

Capacity Retention
96 Months

Capacity Retention
108 Months

Capacity Retention
120 Months

Capacity Retention
>120 Months

Capacity Retention
No Expiry


The part I really can't figure out is how would I identify or break out the 
occupancy by retention.

Has anyone done this before?



Thanks,
Bruce Kamp
Source One Technical
Providing services for Novartis Backup & Recovery
T +18175687331
bruce.k...@novartis.com

US Fort  Worth (USFW)
7001 Calmont Ave.
Fort Worth, TX  76244
USA

Re: HPUX Old Client

[Kamp, Bruce (Ext)]

We use the 5.4.2.7 client on ours.



Bruce Kamp
Source One Technical
Providing services for Novartis Backup & Recovery
T +18175687331
bruce.k...@novartis.com

US Fort  Worth (USFW)
7001 Calmont Ave.
Fort Worth, TX  76244
USA

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Bill 
Boyer
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 7:24 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] HPUX Old Client

That was the oldest client requirement page online I could find. I'll try 
looking at the readme's for some of the 5.4 versions.

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Zoltan 
Forray
Sent: Tuesday, June 6, 2017 8:11 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] HPUX Old Client

Out of curiosity, I went down the "rabbit hole" and even at the 5.5 client 
level, it lists 11i V2 so my guess would be older than 5.5

http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21700848

On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 5:24 PM, Bill Boyer  wrote:

> does someone know what the lastest TSM client version for HP-UX 11i 
> V1? I know it's old, but this is an old system moving over from CommVault to 
> TSM.
>
>
>
> Bill Boyer
>
> "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems." -??
>



--
*Zoltan Forray*
Spectrum Protect (p.k.a. TSM) Software & Hardware Administrator Xymon Monitor 
Administrator VMware Administrator Virginia Commonwealth University UCC/Office 
of Technology Services www.ucc.vcu.edu zfor...@vcu.edu - 804-828-4807 Don't be 
a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will never use email 
to request that you reply with your password, social security number or 
confidential personal information. For more details visit 
http://infosecurity.vcu.edu/phishing.html

SQL Instance Name

[Kamp, Bruce (Ext)]

Is there a way to report on the success/failure on an SQL server that has 
multiple instances on it & display each instance name?
I can't seem to find the instance name stored in the TSM DB.


Thanks,
Bruce Kamp
Source One Technical
Providing services for Novartis Backup & Recovery
T +18175687331
bruce.k...@novartis.com

US Fort  Worth (USFW)
7001 Calmont Ave.
Fort Worth, TX  76244
USA

Re: Windows Client Upgrades

[Kamp, Bruce (Ext)]

If all prerequisites are already installed & all TSM processes are stopped you 
shouldn't need to.

>From what I have seen even if it asks to reboot basic functionality remains.



Bruce Kamp
GIS Backup & Recovery
(817) 568-7331
e-mail: mailto:bruce.k...@novartis.com

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of David 
Ehresman
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 9:31 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Windows Client Upgrades

Can one upgrade a Windows 7.1.x client to a 7.1.somethinghigher client without 
a reboot or do all Windows 7.1 upgrades require a reboot?

David

Re: Restore TSM data with no TSM database.

[Kamp, Bruce (Ext)]

Create a VTL on the DD to back up the TSM DB & have the VTL replicate also.




Bruce Kamp
GIS Backup & Recovery
(817) 568-7331
e-mail: mailto:bruce.k...@novartis.com
Out of Office:  8/4/16-8/9/16

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Plair, 
Ricky
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 10:39 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Restore TSM data with no TSM database.

All,

I'm currently in a DR test,  and the following scenario has raised an ugly 
question.

We have a production Data Domain replicating to a DR DD.

All the data is backed up to the production DD using TSM.

The question is, can  we restore the TSM data at the DR location from the DD if 
we don't have a TSM database.

In other word,  if we lost the TSM database,  but had the data that was backed 
up by a TSM server, is there any way to build a new TSM server and retrieve the 
data.

I appreciate any help.






_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any attachments, is for 
the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and 
privileged information and/or Protected Health Information (PHI) subject to 
protection under the law, including the Health Insurance Portability and 
Accountability Act of 1996, as amended (HIPAA). If you are not the intended 
recipient or the person responsible for delivering the email to the intended 
recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and that any 
use, disclosure, distribution, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email 
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify 
the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the original message.

Managed servers out of sync

[Kamp, Bruce (Ext)]

I have 4 TSM servers running on AIX the library manager/configuration manger is 
now 7.1.4.100 (upgraded from 7.1.0) the other 3 are 7.1.0.
About a month ago the server to server communications stopped working because 
of authentication failure.  In working with IBM it was decided that I need to 
upgrade all my servers to a higher version of TSM.  With all the changes going 
on at the moment it will take a while for me to upgrade the rest of the servers.
I have figured out a temporary work around to get the communications working 
until I can upgrade.  What I found out when I "fixed" the first server is that 
domains have become out of synch.

ANR3350W Locally defined domain FS_PROD_DOMAIN_04 contains
at least one node and cannot be replaced with a
definition from the configuration manager. (SESSION: 4)

When I asked IBM how to figure out which nodes are causing this problem I was 
told I had to move all nodes to a temp domain delete the domain run notify 
subscribers & than move the nodes back into the domain.

What I am wondering is if anyone knows how I can identify what nodes are 
causing this so I only have to move them out & back?


Thanks,
Bruce Kamp
GIS Backup & Recovery
(817) 568-7331
e-mail: mailto:bruce.k...@novartis.com
Out of Office:

Re: Select Statement Help

[Kamp, Bruce (Ext)]

Thanks for the help!
This what I ended up with.

SELECT CAST((NODE_NAME) AS CHAR(20)) AS Node Name,CAST(MIN(BACKUP_DATE) AS 
DATE) AS BACKUP DATE FROM BACKUPS WHERE NODE_NAME LIKE '%_TDP' AND 
STATE='ACTIVE_VERSION' AND CLASS_NAME LIKE 
'%DB%' AND BACKUP_DATE  '2015-02-01' AND FILESPACE_NAME NOT LIKE '%$%' GROUP 
BY NODE_NAME


Bruce Kamp
TSM Administrator
(817) 568-7331


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of 
Hanover, Cameron
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 11:05 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Select Statement Help

This probably isn't completely right, but it might be a start:

select node_name,hl_name,min(backup_date) from backups group by 
node_name,hl_name

--
Cameron Hanover
chano...@umich.edu

Let's get dangerous.
--Darkwing Duck

On Mar 9, 2015, at 3:42 PM, Kamp, Bruce (Ext) bruce.k...@alcon.com wrote:

 I am found a couple TDP SQL nodes that aren't inactivating there backups so 
 TSM isn't expiring them...
 What I am trying to find is the oldest backup date for each server with a 
 name like _TDP.
 
 I can get this:
 Node Name HL_NAME 
BACKUP DATE STATE
 - 
 -  
 --
 XYZ_TDP //
   2009-08-17 ACTIVE_VERSION
 XYZ_TDP //
   2009-09-13 ACTIVE_VERSION
 XYZ_TDP //
   2009-09-14 ACTIVE_VERSION
 XYZ_TDP //
   2009-09-15 ACTIVE_VERSION
 XYZ_TDP //
   2009-09-16 ACTIVE_VERSION
 
 What I really want is something like this:
 Node Name HL_NAME 
BACKUP DATE STATE
 - 
 -  
 --
 XYZ_TDP //
   2009-08-17 ACTIVE_VERSION
 ABC_TDP //
   2009-09-13 ACTIVE_VERSION
 123_TDP //
   2009-09-14 ACTIVE_VERSION
 
 Is this possible ?
 
 Thanks,
 Bruce Kamp
 TSM Administrator
 (817) 568-7331

Select Statement Help

[Kamp, Bruce (Ext)]

I am found a couple TDP SQL nodes that aren't inactivating there backups so TSM 
isn't expiring them...
What I am trying to find is the oldest backup date for each server with a name 
like _TDP.

I can get this:
Node Name HL_NAME   
 BACKUP DATE STATE
- 
-  
--
XYZ_TDP //  
2009-08-17 ACTIVE_VERSION
XYZ_TDP //  
2009-09-13 ACTIVE_VERSION
XYZ_TDP //  
2009-09-14 ACTIVE_VERSION
XYZ_TDP //  
2009-09-15 ACTIVE_VERSION
XYZ_TDP //  
2009-09-16 ACTIVE_VERSION

What I really want is something like this:
Node Name HL_NAME   
 BACKUP DATE STATE
- 
-  
--
XYZ_TDP //  
2009-08-17 ACTIVE_VERSION
ABC_TDP //  
2009-09-13 ACTIVE_VERSION
123_TDP //  
2009-09-14 ACTIVE_VERSION

Is this possible ?

Thanks,
Bruce Kamp
TSM Administrator
(817) 568-7331

Exchange Cluster Setup

[Kamp, Bruce]

I need to setup an Exchange 2003 cluster with TDP Exchange. The cluster has
8 active nodes  2 inactive nodes.

The part I am having a problem is do I set them all up with the same TSM
node name or use different node names for each server?



Thanks,
---
Bruce Kamp
Senior Server Analyst
Memorial Healthcare System
E-Mail:  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 276-4097
Fax: (954) 276-5381
---

FW: [ADSM-L] Exchange Cluster Setup

[Kamp, Bruce]

Can someone answer his question about the INCLUDES section of the dsn.opt?


Thanks,
---
Bruce Kamp
Senior Server Analyst
Memorial Healthcare System
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 276-4097
Fax: (954) 276-5381
---


-Original Message-
From: Ruzgar, Simon
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 4:01 PM
To: Kamp, Bruce
Subject: RE: [ADSM-L] Exchange Cluster Setup

Can we get confirmation, the INCLUDES sections of each dsm.opt also refers
to the virtual server name so presumably we would have to add those for all
six virtual servers?

-Original Message-
From: Kamp, Bruce
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 4:00 PM
To: Ruzgar, Simon
Subject: RE: [ADSM-L] Exchange Cluster Setup

Sounds that way


Thanks,
---
Bruce Kamp
Senior Server Analyst
Memorial Healthcare System
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 276-4097
Fax: (954) 276-5381
---


-Original Message-
From: Ruzgar, Simon
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 3:56 PM
To: Kamp, Bruce
Subject: RE: [ADSM-L] Exchange Cluster Setup

We have 6 active and 2 passive, the six active nodes all have different
NODename in the dsm.opt file(s)

MHSEXCHVS01-TDPE
MHSEXCHVS02-TDPE
MHSEXCHVS03-TDPE
MHSEXCHVS04-TDPE
MHSEXCHVS05-TDPE
MHSEXCHVS06-TDPE

So is this guy saying that in the dsm.opt files on the passive nodes that we
put all 6 nodenames in there?


-Original Message-
From: Kamp, Bruce
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 12:39 PM
To: Ruzgar, Simon
Subject: FW: [ADSM-L] Exchange Cluster Setup

Does this help?


Thanks,
---
Bruce Kamp
Senior Server Analyst
Memorial Healthcare System
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 276-4097
Fax: (954) 276-5381
---


-Original Message-
From: Del Hoobler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 12:29 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Exchange Cluster Setup

Hi Bruce,

I recommend having a different TSM NODENAME for each
virtual Exchange server. I assume that your 2 inactive nodes
could run any of the 8 other virtual Exchange servers.
In that case, you need to configure those 2 inactive nodes
to be able to work with any of the 8 virtual servers.
If you are doing TSM central scheduling, the DP/Exchange
User's Guide discusses how to set up scheduling in a cluster.
You will need to repeat the steps described for each of
your active/passive pairs.

Thanks,

Del




ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 05/21/2007
11:15:08 AM:

 I need to setup an Exchange 2003 cluster with TDP Exchange. The cluster
has
 8 active nodes  2 inactive nodes.

 The part I am having a problem is do I set them all up with the same TSM
 node name or use different node names for each server?

DR Test Help

[Kamp, Bruce]

I am currently doing a DR test.  This is my problem.  One of my copy storage
pool tapes is missing.

This one tape has file system backups for almost all of my RS6000's.

Is there anything I can do with this volume so TSM ignores it or is there
something else I can do?

Would doing a point in time restore get me past this tape?  If so how would
I figure out the date  time?





Thanks,
---
Bruce Kamp
Senior Server Analyst
Memorial Healthcare System
E-Mail:  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 276-4097
Fax: (954) 276-5381
---

Re: DR Test Help

[Kamp, Bruce]

I tried this but I get the message a copy storage pool volume can't be
marked as destroyed.
At this time the volume is marked as unavailable but it still keeps trying
to use it...



Thanks,
---
Bruce Kamp
Senior Server Analyst
Memorial Healthcare System
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 276-4097
Fax: (954) 276-5381
---


-Original Message-
From: Barnes, Kenny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 10:13 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] DR Test Help

Update vol volume_name access=destroyed will keep TSM from trying to
mount the tape.

Point in time should get your clients away from this tape.

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Kamp, Bruce
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 10:01 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: DR Test Help

I am currently doing a DR test.  This is my problem.  One of my copy
storage
pool tapes is missing.

This one tape has file system backups for almost all of my RS6000's.

Is there anything I can do with this volume so TSM ignores it or is
there
something else I can do?

Would doing a point in time restore get me past this tape?  If so how
would
I figure out the date  time?





Thanks,
---
Bruce Kamp
Senior Server Analyst
Memorial Healthcare System
E-Mail:  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 276-4097
Fax: (954) 276-5381
---

--
Note:  The information contained in this message may be privileged and
confidential
and protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient,
or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the
intended recipient,
you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of
this communication
is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this communication in error,
please notify us
immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.
Thank you.

--

Re: DR Test Help

[Kamp, Bruce]

Thanks for the help.  Problem has been resolved.
The tape was in the library but the library manager didn't know about it
Restores are running now!!!


Thanks,
---
Bruce Kamp
Senior Server Analyst
Memorial Healthcare System
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 276-4097
Fax: (954) 276-5381
---


-Original Message-
From: Shawn Drew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 11:52 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] DR Test Help

Just delete it..  The data will be recreated by primary copy data the next
time a ba stg is run (after your test)

-Shawn





Internet
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sent by: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
05/08/2007 10:28 AM
Please respond to
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU


To
ADSM-L
cc

Subject
Re: [ADSM-L] DR Test Help





I tried this but I get the message a copy storage pool volume can't be
marked as destroyed.
At this time the volume is marked as unavailable but it still keeps trying
to use it...



Thanks,
---
Bruce Kamp
Senior Server Analyst
Memorial Healthcare System
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 276-4097
Fax: (954) 276-5381
---


-Original Message-
From: Barnes, Kenny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 10:13 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] DR Test Help

Update vol volume_name access=destroyed will keep TSM from trying to
mount the tape.

Point in time should get your clients away from this tape.

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Kamp, Bruce
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 10:01 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: DR Test Help

I am currently doing a DR test.  This is my problem.  One of my copy
storage
pool tapes is missing.

This one tape has file system backups for almost all of my RS6000's.

Is there anything I can do with this volume so TSM ignores it or is
there
something else I can do?

Would doing a point in time restore get me past this tape?  If so how
would
I figure out the date  time?





Thanks,
---
Bruce Kamp
Senior Server Analyst
Memorial Healthcare System
E-Mail:  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 276-4097
Fax: (954) 276-5381
---

--
Note:  The information contained in this message may be privileged and
confidential
and protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient,
or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the
intended recipient,
you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of
this communication
is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this communication in error,
please notify us
immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.
Thank you.

--


This message and any attachments (the message) is
intended solely for the addressees and is confidential.
If you receive this message in error, please delete it and
immediately notify the sender. Any use not in accord with
its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole
or partial, is prohibited except formal approval. The internet
can not guarantee the integrity of this message.
BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall (will) not
therefore be liable for the message if modified.

-

Ce message et toutes les pieces jointes (ci-apres le
message) sont etablis a l'intention exclusive de ses
destinataires et sont confidentiels. Si vous recevez ce
message par erreur, merci de le detruire et d'en avertir
immediatement l'expediteur. Toute utilisation de ce
message non conforme a sa destination, toute diffusion
ou toute publication, totale ou partielle, est interdite, sauf
autorisation expresse. L'internet ne permettant pas
d'assurer l'integrite de ce message, BNP PARIBAS (et ses
filiales) decline(nt) toute responsabilite au titre de ce
message, dans l'hypothese ou il aurait ete modifie.

Re: Is there a way to install the TSM Novell client remo tely

[Kamp, Bruce]

I just checked with one of the Novell admins here  they use adrem freecon.



Thanks,
---
Bruce Kamp
Senior Server Analyst
Memorial Healthcare System
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 276-4097
Fax: (954) 276-5381
---


-Original Message-
From: Timothy Hughes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 11:27 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Is there a way to install the TSM Novell client remotely

Hello,

I have to install Novell TSM clients on about 30 servers that are spread out
over distances. Does anyone know of a way  to connect  to novell servers
remotely? Without having to go physically to the server?  Is there a Desktop
Remote Manager for Novell?



Thanks for any help or suggestions in advance!

Re: TDP SQL Backups

[Kamp, Bruce]

I finally got this working!  Thanks for the help.  I found out why it wasn't
working the user wasn't given sysadmin rights to SQL.

My DBA's would like to know why the user can't only be in the backup
operator role.



Thanks,
---
Bruce Kamp
Senior Server Analyst
Memorial Healthcare System
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 276-4097
Fax: (954) 276-5381
---


-Original Message-
From: Del Hoobler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 1:23 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TDP SQL Backups

Bruce,

In that case... you simply need to set the Log On As account
for the scheduler service to the Windows userid that has been
given permission on the SQL Server. Userid and password
on the command-line are only meaningful for
/SQLAUTHentication=SQLuserid.

Thanks,

Del



ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 04/25/2007
01:09:01 PM:

 What I was trying to use was a windows AD account.  I wanted to use this
 because this going to become a standard in my organization.

=

 Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 12:37 PM
 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TDP SQL Backups

 Bruce,

 If you want to use SQL Server authentication. i.e.
/SQLAUTHentication=SQLuserid

 Did you try to use the GUI--- Utilities --- SQL Server Login Settings
 to set your SQL Server login id and password?
 Then, stop the DP/SQL GUI... and try this command:

TDPSQLC QUERY SQL /SQLAUTHentication=SQLuserid /sqluser=user

 and then

TDPSQLC BACKUP dbname FULL /SQLAUTHentication=SQLuserid /sqluser=user

 Thanks,

 Del

 


 ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 04/25/2007
 10:04:48 AM:

  On some of my SQL servers rights have been taken away from the local
 system
  account to SQL.  In the documentation I found that I can add the
 username 
  password to a user that has rights to backup SQL to the command file
to
 run
  the backup.  The problem with this is that it is in clear text so
anyone
 who
  has rights to the server can see the username  password.  Is there
any
  other way to set this up?

TDP SQL Backups

[Kamp, Bruce]

On some of my SQL servers rights have been taken away from the local system
account to SQL.  In the documentation I found that I can add the username 
password to a user that has rights to backup SQL to the command file to run
the backup.  The problem with this is that it is in clear text so anyone who
has rights to the server can see the username  password.  Is there any
other way to set this up?



Thanks,
---
Bruce Kamp
Senior Server Analyst
Memorial Healthcare System
E-Mail:  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 276-4097
Fax: (954) 276-5381
---

Re: TDP SQL Backups

[Kamp, Bruce]

What I was trying to use was a windows AD account.  I wanted to use this
because this going to become a standard in my organization.



Thanks,
---
Bruce Kamp
Senior Server Analyst
Memorial Healthcare System
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 276-4097
Fax: (954) 276-5381
---

-Original Message-
From: Del Hoobler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 12:37 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TDP SQL Backups

Bruce,

If you want to use SQL Server authentication. i.e.
   /SQLAUTHentication=SQLuserid

Did you try to use the GUI--- Utilities --- SQL Server Login Settings
to set your SQL Server login id and password?
Then, stop the DP/SQL GUI... and try this command:

   TDPSQLC QUERY SQL /SQLAUTHentication=SQLuserid /sqluser=user

and then

   TDPSQLC BACKUP dbname FULL /SQLAUTHentication=SQLuserid /sqluser=user

Thanks,

Del




ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 04/25/2007
10:04:48 AM:

 On some of my SQL servers rights have been taken away from the local
system
 account to SQL.  In the documentation I found that I can add the
username 
 password to a user that has rights to backup SQL to the command file to
run
 the backup.  The problem with this is that it is in clear text so anyone
who
 has rights to the server can see the username  password.  Is there any
 other way to set this up?

Re: Daily Operational Report SMTP Address setting

[Kamp, Bruce]

On mine I just right click on the Tivoli Storage Manager  select TSM
Operational Reporting.  Then select the E-Mail Account tab.


Thanks,
---
Bruce Kamp
Senior Server Analyst
Memorial Healthcare System
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 276-4097
Fax: (954) 276-5381
---

-Original Message-
From: Barrett Keziah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2007 2:10 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Daily Operational Report SMTP Address setting

OK...for the life of me I can't find this option.  We recently changed
some IP addresses on campus and our SMTP/Exchange server was one that
changed.  I am no longer getting the daily reports because the server is
still trying to send the daily email to the old IP address.  I have
looked in the management console (this is a windows 2003 box running
v5.3.4 of TSM) and tried the IBM docs online with no success.  I see
where I can setup up the daily reports and who they go to, but not the
smtp server IP setting.

Any one know off the tops of their heads?

Barrett
___
Barrett Keziah
Systems Administrator
Ravenscroft School
Raleigh, NC


##
This email and any attachments are confidential and intended solely for use
by the individual or
entity to whom they are addressed and should not be disseminated without
permission. No confidentiality
or privilege is waived by any mistransmission. If you have received this
email in error, please delete
it and all copies of it from your system immediately. You must not, directly
or indirectly, use, disclose,
distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the
intended recipient. Any views or
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of Ravenscroft.

Note: This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses by NetIQ MailMarshal.
Ravenscroft
accepts no liability for any damage caused by viruses transmitted by this
email. In addition,
Ravenscroft reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through
its networks.

##

Re: Question regarding TSM and citrix servers

[Kamp, Bruce]

I have been backing up my farm for a few years now with no difficulties.



-
Bruce Kamp
Senior Server Analyst
Memorial Healthcare System
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597
Pager: (954) 286-9441
Alphapage:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax: (954) 985-1404
-


-Original Message-
From: Tammy Schellenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 11:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Question regarding TSM and citrix servers

Does anyone out there use citrix servers?  Here is the question.

Can I expect any difficulties in backing up a Citrix server with Tivoli?
I have two servers that are serving miscellaneous programs to our users and
they are not generic enough that we can afford not to back them up. Our
Network Manager has asked that I install the Tivoli BA client on these
computers. I thought I would check with as I have been unable to find any
documentation about it on the internet. This may mean that there is no
problem with doing it but I would like to confirm this before doing it.


Tammy Schellenberg
Systems Administrator, MCP
Prospera Credit Union
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DID: 604-864-6578





This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed.
If you are not the original recipient or the person responsible for
delivering the email to the intended recipient, be advised that you have
received this email in error, and that any use, dissemination, forwarding,
printing, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you receive
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender.

Please note that this financial institution neither accepts nor discloses
confidential member account information via email. This includes password
related inquiries, financial transaction instructions and address changes.

Re: include/exclude statements

[Kamp, Bruce]

Should be exclude.fs 


-
Bruce Kamp
Senior Server Analyst
Memorial Healthcare System
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597
Pager: (954) 286-9441
Alphapage: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax: (954) 985-1404
-

-Original Message-
From: Richard Mochnaczewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 11:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: include/exclude statements

Hi,

I'm setting up my include/exclude statements dsm.sys file on all my AIX
servers, and I'm running into problem with the excludes. I want to exclude
the following filesystems :

/
/usr
/var
/tmp

I'm using the following statements in my dsm.sys :

exclude.dir /
exclude.dir /usr
exclude.dir /var
exclude.dir /tmp

followed by whatever other filesystems I want excluded . The four I've
pointed out are are constantly being backed up. I'm running version TSM
5.2.2 on AIX 5.2 server. All my clients are 5.2.2. Any ideas ?

Rich




This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not
waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying
of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended
recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please
advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. 

Ce courriel est confidentiel et protégé. L'expéditeur ne renonce pas aux
droits et obligations qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou
copie de ce message ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne
autre que le (les) destinataire(s) désigné(s) est interdite. Si vous recevez
ce courriel par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser immédiatement, par retour de
courriel ou par un autre moyen.

FW: NSS Migration

[Kamp, Bruce]

How will this affect TSM backups?  Will I need to do anything special?
Create new node for new backups or rename file spaces?
Right now I'm running TSM 5.2.1.2 on AIX 5.1.
Client is ver 5.2.2.0

-
Bruce Kamp
Senior Server Analyst
Memorial Healthcare System
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597
Pager: (954) 286-9441
Alphapage: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax: (954) 985-1404
-


 __
 From: Diaz, Alain
 Sent: Friday, August 13, 2004 9:06 AM
 To:   Kamp, Bruce
 Subject:  NSS Migration

 Bruce,

 I will be converting the file system on the NetWare server to NSS from
 Traditional.  Nothing else will change.

 Here are the current server specs:

 NW6, SP4
 TSA600
 eDir v8.6.2
 Traditional File System - converting to NSS.


 Thanks,

 Alain Diaz
 CNE, Net+
 Systems Analyst II
 Memorial Healthcare System
 821 S Douglas Rd, Pembroke Pines, FL 33025
 Office: 954.987.2020, x4589
 Pager: 954.286.0142, Text: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Fax:954.443.4788
 Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: 3590H1A Upgrade Question

[Kamp, Bruce]

I tried deleting all my 3590 drives  paths but still says 3590E..
I didn't delete the library.
Any other suggestions?


-
Bruce Kamp
Senior Server Analyst
Memorial Healthcare System
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597
Pager: (954) 286-9441
Alphapage: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax: (954) 985-1404
-

-Original Message-
From: James, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 4:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 3590H1A Upgrade Question

They should say: Read Formats 3590H-C,3590H-B, Write Formats
3590H-C,3590H-B

Have you deleted the drives in TSM and redefined them.

Software Services Unit
Information Technology Services Division / Data Center
California Public Employees' Retirement System
Phone: (916) 326-3715
Fax: (916) 326-3884
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Kamp, Bruce
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 12:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 3590H1A Upgrade Question


I just upgraded my 3590 drives from E1A to H1A.  When I look at the
drives in TSM they still say for read  write formats 3590E-C,3590E-B.
Shouldn't it say 3590H? I'm on TSM 5.2.1.2 on AIX 5.1 with ATAPE 8.4.1.0


Thanks,

-
Bruce Kamp
Senior Server Analyst
Memorial Healthcare System
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597
Pager: (954) 286-9441
Alphapage: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax: (954) 985-1404
-

3590H1A Upgrade Question

[Kamp, Bruce]

I just upgraded my 3590 drives from E1A to H1A.  When I look at the drives
in TSM they still say for read  write formats 3590E-C,3590E-B.  Shouldn't
it say 3590H?
I'm on TSM 5.2.1.2 on AIX 5.1 with ATAPE 8.4.1.0


Thanks,

-
Bruce Kamp
Senior Server Analyst
Memorial Healthcare System
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597
Pager: (954) 286-9441
Alphapage: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax: (954) 985-1404
-

Re: TSM Client V5.2.2.10 for Windows 2000/2003

[Kamp, Bruce]

I just started to notice this also on one of my Win2k3 servers.
I never heard about splitting the backups before now

Also noticed these errors:

07/20/2004 02:34:44 ANS1512E Scheduled event 'WIN_SYS_4' failed.  Return
code = 12.
07/20/2004 06:44:26 VssQuerySystemWriters(): pAsync-QueryStatus() returns
hr=E_UNEXPECTED
07/20/2004 06:44:34 VssQuerySystemWriters(): pAsync-QueryStatus() returns
hr=E_UNEXPECTED
07/20/2004 06:44:41 GetDfsEnum(): Server=\\xxx01, NetDfsEnum() returns
RC=259.
07/20/2004 06:44:52 VssQuerySystemWriters(): pAsync-QueryStatus() returns
hr=E_UNEXPECTED
07/20/2004 06:47:46 VssQuerySystemWriters(): pAsync-QueryStatus() returns
hr=E_UNEXPECTED
07/20/2004 06:47:46 VssQuerySystemWriters(): pAsync-QueryStatus() returns
hr=E_UNEXPECTED



-
Bruce Kamp
Senior Server Analyst
Memorial Healthcare System
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597
Pager: (954) 286-9441
Alphapage: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax: (954) 985-1404
-

-Original Message-
From: Cooper, Melinda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 10:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TSM Client V5.2.2.10 for Windows 2000/2003

We've been working with IBM Support on various issues we've had with
this version of the client V5.2.2.10.



We are reviewing this newer version and wonder if anyone has had any
issues?



Currently the majority of our Windows servers have TSM Client V5.1
installed.  We realized a few months ago that our system objects were
not being backed up and updated our dsm.opt file to 'domain all-local'.
In doing this we ran into some issues of getting RC=12 - failure
notifications that the backups failed.  In reviewing the event log,
dsmerror log and adsmsched log file it says that in fact the files were
backed up.  IBM said that this was resolved with TSM Client V5.2.2.10.
I have since been installing mainly Windows 2003 operating systems with
this newer version.  Periodically we run into the same issue of RC=12 -
failure notification that the backup failed, but in fact the files were
backed up.



IBM has said that the 'best practice' is to have two separate backups
one for system objects and the other for files.  I have over 80 windows
servers and I'd rather upgrade to the newer client than change all the
dsm.opt files and install a batch file.





Melinda Cooper
Senior Information Center Analyst
Work - 425.783.4467
Pager - 425.438.5981

Re: Windows client passwords for multiple servers

[Kamp, Bruce]

The registry key is:

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\IBM\ADSM\CurrentVersion\BackupClient\Nodes


-
Bruce Kamp
Senior Server Analyst
Memorial Healthcare System
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597
Pager: (954) 286-9441
Alphapage:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax: (954) 985-1404
-


-Original Message-
From: Prather, Wanda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 11:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Windows client passwords for multiple servers

Hi Thomas,

I never found documentation for this situation, either.  And I'm not sure
it's even consistent between TSm server versions.
I can only tell you about my experience moving clients from an AIX to
Windows TSM server via export/import.

What I found (and this was at TSM 5.1) was that

1) The good news:  TSM Windows clients had no problem maintaining passwords
for 2 different TSM servers in the registry.
I don't remember where to find it now, but at one time I think we started
regedit and just poked around until we found that the client had the good
sense to store stuff in the registry under a key that included the TSM
server name (not the host name, but the name you define with SET
SERVERNAME).  So it can maintain as many passwords as you have TSM servers.

2) Now the bad news:  Doing an export/import ACROSS platforms invalidated
the password in the registry (Or rather, it no longer matched what was in
the client registry).  We had to go to each Windows client and REENTER the
password on the client end the first time it connected to the new (Windows)
TSM server it has been IMPORTED to.

Now I'm not sure if that was because
a) the password encryption algorithm is different between AIX and Windows
TSM servers, or
b) the IP address being different caused the problem.

Anyway,  don't assume that anybody knows for sure what will happen to the
password when you EXPORT/IMPORT from OS/390 to Linux - I have no clue.  You
better try it and see.

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Thomas Denier
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 11:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Windows client passwords for multiple servers


We are preparing to migrate our TSM server from OS/390 to mainframe Linux.
We are planning to run complete backups to the new server and let data on
the old server age off. Each of our Windows clients will need two options
files for a while (one for each server). In most cases, the options file for
the old server will be needed only for restores of files that became
inactive before the cut-over. However, some of our clients are too big to do
a complete backup in one day.
Each of these will need two scheduler services as well as two options files.
One service will be used to run the complete backup to the new server in
managable chunks, and the other will be used to continue incremental backups
to the old server.

The documentation for the Windows client code indicates that passwords are
stored in the registry. However, the documentation provides no information
about the registry keys used, and hence no information about the conditions
(if any) under which two independently maintained passwords can be stored.

The procedure we have in mind for most Windows clients is as follows:
1.Use server to server export/import to copy the node name and password
  from old server to new server.
2.Copy dsm.opt to oldtsm.opt.
3.Update dsm.opt to address the new server.
4.Stop and start the scheduler service.

Eventually, one or both of the servers will negotiate a new password (we
always use 'passwordaccess generate'). Will scheduled backups to the new
server work after that? Will it still be possible to run manually initiated
restores from either server?

A few of the bigger clients will require an additional step:
5.Define a second scheduler service using oldtsm.opt.

This raises an additional question. Will scheduled backups to both servers
continue working after a password change?

Re: Return Code

[Kamp, Bruce]

Means that for some reason the command isn't working.
Could be any number of reasons...
Batch file is missing, permissions changes.
My suggestion is to try running the command from the server to see why it is
erroring out...


-
Bruce Kamp
Senior Server Analyst
Memorial Healthcare System
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597
Pager: (954) 286-9441
Alphapage:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax: (954) 985-1404
-


-Original Message-
From: fred johanson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 1:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Return Code

I know this came up in the last week or so but I can't find the mail, so...

We have a command schedule created by someone long gone running on an NT4
box with an obsolete client that began yesterday to fail with RC=1.  TSM
support site isn't responding, so can someone answer this quickly?

TIA



Fred Johanson
ITSM Administrator
University of Chicago
773-702-8464

Re: TDP for SQL

[Kamp, Bruce]

I have used it on standard  enterprise.  Works great.


-
Bruce Kamp
Senior Midrange Systems Analyst
Memorial Healthcare System
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597
Pager: (954) 286-9441
Alphapage: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax: (954) 985-1404
-

-Original Message-
From: Moses Show [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 9:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TDP for SQL

Hi everyone,
Have been asked to roll out TDP for SQL 5.2.1 on a number of SQL
servers but, after looking through the manual thereis still one main
question that I need answering. Con somebody confirm or refute that TDP
for SQL 5.2.1 works with SQL server Standard/ Enterprise and Developer
editions. Does it work for some but not all editions / Help would be most
gratefully received.

Thanks

==
This communication, together with any attachments hereto or links contained
herein, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
information that is confidential or legally protected. If you are not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, disclosure,
copying, dissemination, distribution or use of this communication is
STRICTLY PROHIBITED.  If you have received this communication in error,
please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail message and delete the
original and all copies of the communication, along with any attachments
hereto or links herein, from your system.


==
The St. Paul Travelers e-mail system made this annotation on 06/16/2004,
09:18:58 AM.

Pre Sched command help

[Kamp, Bruce]

I have a Win2k node that I need to run a pre schedule command that runs an
application DB backup.  The only way I have been able to get the batch file
to run is using Win2k's at commands with the /interactive switch.
Any ideas how I can accomplish this using a pre-sched command?


Thanks,
-
Bruce Kamp
Senior Midrange Systems Analyst
Memorial Healthcare System
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597
Pager: (954) 286-9441
Alphapage: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax: (954) 985-1404
-

Re: Anr2841w Server is NOT IN COMPLIANCE with license terms.

[Kamp, Bruce]

Run Q LIC

Look at the IN USE ver the LICENSED.

   Number of TDP for MS Exchange in use: 6
 Number of TDP for MS Exchange licensed: 6

You will find the in use is greater then the licensed.


-
Bruce Kamp
Senior Midrange Systems Analyst
Memorial Healthcare System
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597
Pager: (954) 286-9441
Alphapage: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax: (954) 985-1404
-

-Original Message-
From: Crawford, L. (Lindy) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 9:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Anr2841w Server is NOT IN COMPLIANCE with license terms.

Hi

This is weird as, today while going through my actlog I discovered the same
error above. All is okay with my license file but it will not validate the
license.

Please help...


Lindy

-Original Message-
From: Mohamed Adan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 June 2004 01:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Anr2841w Server is NOT IN COMPLIANCE with license terms.



You have more nodes registered than your licensed for. Run q lic to check.


Mohamed



Timothy Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]


01.06.2004 13:50


Please respond to
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]



To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

cc

Subject
Anr2841w Server is NOT IN COMPLIANCE with license terms.






We are getting the following message in the server activity log

ANR2841W Server is NOT IN COMPLIANCE with license terms.

the server appears to be functioning normally can anyone tell me what
it means? Here is are license info












**
This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of known computer viruses.

Denne mailen er sjekket for kjente virus, uten at noen ble funnet.

www.hydrotexaco.no
**




This email and any accompanying attachments may contain confidential and
proprietary information.  This information is private and protected by law
and, accordingly, if you are not the intended recipient, you are requested
to delete this entire communication immediately and are notified that any
disclosure, copying or distribution of or taking any action based on this
information is prohibited.

Emails cannot be guaranteed to be secure or free of errors or viruses.  The
sender does not accept any liability or responsibility for any interception,
corruption, destruction, loss, late arrival or incompleteness of or
tampering or interference with any of the information contained in this
email or for its incorrect delivery or non-delivery for whatsoever reason or
for its effect on any electronic device of the recipient.

If verification of this email or any attachment is required, please request
a hard-copy version.

Re: TDP Oracle Question

[Kamp, Bruce]

I'm still at a loss
Here is my setup:

Mgmt Class:
Policy Domain Name C1_ORA_AGENT
Policy Set Name ACTIVE
Mgmt Class Name C1_ORACLE_MGMT_CLASS
Default Mgmt Class ? No
Description C1 Oracle Agent MGMT Class
Space Management Technique NONE
Auto-Migrate on Non-Use 0
Migration Requires Backup? NO
Migration Destination C1_ORA_DISK_POOL

Backup Copy Group:
Policy Domain Name C1_ORA_AGENT
Policy Set Name ACTIVE
Mgmt Class Name C1_ORACLE_MGMT_CLASS
Copy Group Name STANDARD
Versions Data Exists 1
Versions Data Deleted 0
Retain Extra Versions 1
Retain Only Version 0
Copy Mode MODIFIED
Copy Serialization SHRSTATIC
Copy Frequency 0
Copy Destination C1_ORA_DISK_POOL

Disk Storage Pool:
Storage Pool Name C1_ORA_DISK_POOL
Storage Pool Type PRIMARY
Device Class Name DISK
Estimated Capacity (MB) 200272.0
Pct Util 15.8
Pct Migr 15.8
Pct Logical 100.0
High Mig Pct 90
Low Mig Pct 70
Migration Processes 4
Next Storage Pool C1_ORA_TAPE_POOL
Maximum Size Threshold -
Access READWRITE
Description C1 Oracle Disk Pool

When I look at the disk storage pool it is only 10-15% percent utilized.
Also the only migration I see is the one I do during my normal daily
processing.
Any more ideas?



Thanks,
-
Bruce Kamp
Senior Midrange Systems Analyst
Memorial Healthcare System
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597
Pager: (954) 286-9441
Alphapage: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax: (954) 985-1404
-

-Original Message-
From: Greg Kemp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 12:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TDP Oracle Question

TSM does not lock the total required space for a backup in a storage
pool before the actual backup starts or while in progress. TSM fills
the defined devices for a management class in order of definition until
the storage pool is full or the backup completes. Fill your disks and
TSM moves on to the tape pool or some other defined device.

Bruce

If the MAXSIZE threshold on your disk pool is set to 200GB (which is
excessive) and you have 133GB available there is no reason the backup
isn't ending up on disk. Double check your management class for both
the backup and archive copy pools. TDP for Oracle uses the 'BACKUP'
copy group which in your case should point to the disk pool. TDP does
not use the 'ARCHIVE' copy group. I have been bitten by this one in the
past.

Regards,

Greg


On May 24, 2004, at 8:53 AM, Wholey, Joseph (IDS DMDS) wrote:

 Bruce,

 You should make sure that the percentage utilized in your storage pool
 is 0% prior to running your backup.  Also, are any other backups
 running.  Keep in mind that once TSM sees that it's going to need
 133Gig of disk to backup the Oracle db, it will attempt to lock that
 amount of the stg pool.  If the full amount is not available, it will
 go to the next stg pool.

 Regards, Joe

 -Original Message-
 From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
 Kamp, Bruce
 Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 11:34 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: TDP Oracle Question


 That is set to 200G.


 -
 Bruce Kamp
 Senior Midrange Systems Analyst
 Memorial Healthcare System
 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597
 Pager: (954) 286-9441
 Alphapage: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Fax: (954) 985-1404
 -

 -Original Message-
 From: Hooft, Jeroen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 8:30 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: TDP Oracle Question

 Maybe setting on disk storagepool: Maximum Size Threshold?

 Jeroen


 -Original Message-
 From: Kamp, Bruce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: maandag 24 mei 2004 14:00
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: TDP Oracle Question


 I'm trying to give enough disk to my Oracle backups but have not been
 successful.  My management classes point to disk.  How do I find out
 how
 much disk TSM is looking for to backup straight to disk?  I looked on
 the
 system  saw that the dbf files added up to about 133G I have given it
 200G.
 Or is there something else that could be pointing to tape instead of
 disk?
 I'm running TSM 5.2.1.2 on AIX 5.1.  The client is running TSM
 5.1.5.11 
 TDP Oracle ver 2.2.0.1 with Oracle 8.1.7.4.


 Thanks,
 -
 Bruce Kamp
 Senior Midrange Systems Analyst
 Memorial Healthcare System
 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597
 Pager: (954) 286-9441
 Alphapage: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Fax: (954) 985-1404
 -
 

 If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the
 sender, delete it and do not read, act upon, print, disclose, copy,
 retain or redistribute it. Click here for important additional terms
 relating to this e

Re: TDP Oracle Question

[Kamp, Bruce]

Here you go.

Policy Domain Name C1_ORA_AGENT
Policy Set Name ACTIVE
Mgmt Class Name STANDARD
Copy Group Name STANDARD
Versions Data Exists 1
Versions Data Deleted 0
Retain Extra Versions 1
Retain Only Version 0
Copy Mode MODIFIED
Copy Serialization SHRSTATIC
Copy Frequency 0
Copy Destination C1_ORA_DISK_POOL


DSMI_ORC_CONFIG /usr/tivoli/tsm/client/api/bin/dsm.opt
DSMI_LOG/tmp
TDPO_NODE   xyz_oracle_prod816
TDPO_OWNER  oracle
TDPO_PSWDPATH   /usr/tivoli/tsm/client/oracle/bin
TDPO_NUM_BUFFERS10
TDPO_FS xyz_oracle_prod816
* TDPO_TRACE_FLAGSorclevel0 orclevel1 orclevel2
* TDPO_TRACE_FILE
/usr/tivoli/tsm/client/oracle/bin64/tdpo_trace.out
* TDPO_OWNER  username
* TDPO_AVG_SIZE   user_define ***Not needed for Oracle 8.1.x
* TDPO_MGMT_CLASS_2   class_name
* TDPO_MGMT_CLASS_3   class_name
* TDPO_MGMT_CLASS_4   class_name


Thanks,
-
Bruce Kamp
Senior Midrange Systems Analyst
Memorial Healthcare System
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597
Pager: (954) 286-9441
Alphapage: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax: (954) 985-1404
-

-Original Message-
From: Prasad, Mahesh (IDS ECCS) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 9:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TDP Oracle Question

Bruce,

The management class you have shown over here is not the default management
class. Can you please send the backup copy group details of the default
management class and details of the tdpo.opt file?

Regards,

Mahesh Prasad

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Kamp, Bruce
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 8:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TDP Oracle Question


I'm still at a loss
Here is my setup:

Mgmt Class:
Policy Domain Name C1_ORA_AGENT
Policy Set Name ACTIVE
Mgmt Class Name C1_ORACLE_MGMT_CLASS
Default Mgmt Class ? No
Description C1 Oracle Agent MGMT Class
Space Management Technique NONE
Auto-Migrate on Non-Use 0
Migration Requires Backup? NO
Migration Destination C1_ORA_DISK_POOL

Backup Copy Group:
Policy Domain Name C1_ORA_AGENT
Policy Set Name ACTIVE
Mgmt Class Name C1_ORACLE_MGMT_CLASS
Copy Group Name STANDARD
Versions Data Exists 1
Versions Data Deleted 0
Retain Extra Versions 1
Retain Only Version 0
Copy Mode MODIFIED
Copy Serialization SHRSTATIC
Copy Frequency 0
Copy Destination C1_ORA_DISK_POOL

Disk Storage Pool:
Storage Pool Name C1_ORA_DISK_POOL
Storage Pool Type PRIMARY
Device Class Name DISK
Estimated Capacity (MB) 200272.0
Pct Util 15.8
Pct Migr 15.8
Pct Logical 100.0
High Mig Pct 90
Low Mig Pct 70
Migration Processes 4
Next Storage Pool C1_ORA_TAPE_POOL
Maximum Size Threshold -
Access READWRITE
Description C1 Oracle Disk Pool

When I look at the disk storage pool it is only 10-15% percent utilized.
Also the only migration I see is the one I do during my normal daily
processing.
Any more ideas?



Thanks,
-
Bruce Kamp
Senior Midrange Systems Analyst
Memorial Healthcare System
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597
Pager: (954) 286-9441
Alphapage: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax: (954) 985-1404
-

-Original Message-
From: Greg Kemp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 12:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TDP Oracle Question

TSM does not lock the total required space for a backup in a storage
pool before the actual backup starts or while in progress. TSM fills
the defined devices for a management class in order of definition until
the storage pool is full or the backup completes. Fill your disks and
TSM moves on to the tape pool or some other defined device.

Bruce

If the MAXSIZE threshold on your disk pool is set to 200GB (which is
excessive) and you have 133GB available there is no reason the backup
isn't ending up on disk. Double check your management class for both
the backup and archive copy pools. TDP for Oracle uses the 'BACKUP'
copy group which in your case should point to the disk pool. TDP does
not use the 'ARCHIVE' copy group. I have been bitten by this one in the
past.

Regards,

Greg


On May 24, 2004, at 8:53 AM, Wholey, Joseph (IDS DMDS) wrote:

 Bruce,

 You should make sure that the percentage utilized in your storage pool
 is 0% prior to running your backup.  Also, are any other backups
 running.  Keep in mind that once TSM sees that it's going to need
 133Gig of disk to backup the Oracle db, it will attempt to lock that
 amount of the stg pool.  If the full amount is not available, it will
 go to the next stg pool.

 Regards, Joe

 -Original Message-
 From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
 Kamp, Bruce
 Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 11:34 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: TDP Oracle Question

Re: TSM's use of processors

[Kamp, Bruce]

I have the same an 8 way M80.  It uses them all.


-
Bruce Kamp
Senior Midrange Systems Analyst
Memorial Healthcare System
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597
Pager: (954) 286-9441
Alphapage: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax: (954) 985-1404
-

-Original Message-
From: Paul Zarnowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 9:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM's use of processors

We have an 8-way M80 running only TSM, and it is using all 8 processors.

At 09:19 AM 5/26/2004 -0400, David E Ehresman wrote:
We are running TSM on Aix 5.1 on a 7026-6H1 with four processors.  We
are starting to explore upgrade scenarios.  One thing we are being told
is that TSM will not use more than four processors.  Any truth to this?
If so, where would that be documented?

David Ehresman
University of Louisville


--
Paul Zarnowski Ph: 607-255-4757
719 Rhodes Hall, Cornell UniversityFx: 607-255-8521
Ithaca, NY 14853-3801  Em: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: TSM 32Bit to 64bit Upgrade

[Kamp, Bruce]

If I remember correctly I uninstalled the TSM 32bit code  then installed
the 64bit (same version). The only difference is that I'm running AIX 5.1.


-
Bruce Kamp
Senior Midrange Systems Analyst
Memorial Healthcare System
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597
Pager: (954) 286-9441
Alphapage: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax: (954) 985-1404
-

-Original Message-
From: Dan Foster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 12:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM 32Bit to 64bit Upgrade

Hot Diggety! Hart, Charles was rumored to have written:
 We are currently are running TSM 5.1.7.3 - 32bit on a p630 AIX 5.2.2.
 We would like to change the TSM from 32bit to 64bit during this
 upgrade.  We ran a preview of the install choosing the 64bit rte and
 server code and lic filesets but the preview failed because it stated
 that the tsm.server.rte was already there.  We decided to just go
 ahead and upgrade the 32bit code.

 Has anyone upgraded TSM 5.x from 32 to 64bit code?  The Quick Start
 and Admin guide only make reference to AIX 4.3 to 5.2, nothing about
 32Bit to 64bit TSM.

Haven't done the exact situation you described but my guess is you'd
have to upgrade the OS to 5.2, verify bos.64bit is installed, bootinfo
-K says 64 (if it doesn't, you'll need to adjust the two symlinks, do
bosboot, and reboot), then uninstall tsm.server.rte and install
tivoli.tsm.server.aix5.rte64, and make sure TSM and the OS is
patched/upgraded.

You'd be well advised to take a mksysb backup of the system prior to the
upgrade and perhaps do the 4.3.3-5.2 upgrade via alt_disk_migration.

-Dan

TDP Oracle Question

[Kamp, Bruce]

I'm trying to give enough disk to my Oracle backups but have not been
successful.  My management classes point to disk.  How do I find out how
much disk TSM is looking for to backup straight to disk?  I looked on the
system  saw that the dbf files added up to about 133G I have given it 200G.
Or is there something else that could be pointing to tape instead of disk?
I'm running TSM 5.2.1.2 on AIX 5.1.  The client is running TSM 5.1.5.11 
TDP Oracle ver 2.2.0.1 with Oracle 8.1.7.4.


Thanks,
-
Bruce Kamp
Senior Midrange Systems Analyst
Memorial Healthcare System
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597
Pager: (954) 286-9441
Alphapage: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax: (954) 985-1404
-

Re: TDP Oracle Question

[Kamp, Bruce]

That is set to 200G.


-
Bruce Kamp
Senior Midrange Systems Analyst
Memorial Healthcare System
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597
Pager: (954) 286-9441
Alphapage: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax: (954) 985-1404
-

-Original Message-
From: Hooft, Jeroen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 8:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TDP Oracle Question

Maybe setting on disk storagepool: Maximum Size Threshold?

Jeroen


-Original Message-
From: Kamp, Bruce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: maandag 24 mei 2004 14:00
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TDP Oracle Question


I'm trying to give enough disk to my Oracle backups but have not been
successful.  My management classes point to disk.  How do I find out how
much disk TSM is looking for to backup straight to disk?  I looked on the
system  saw that the dbf files added up to about 133G I have given it 200G.
Or is there something else that could be pointing to tape instead of disk?
I'm running TSM 5.2.1.2 on AIX 5.1.  The client is running TSM 5.1.5.11 
TDP Oracle ver 2.2.0.1 with Oracle 8.1.7.4.


Thanks,
-
Bruce Kamp
Senior Midrange Systems Analyst
Memorial Healthcare System
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597
Pager: (954) 286-9441
Alphapage: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax: (954) 985-1404
-

Re: Expiration

[Kamp, Bruce]

As far as my cache hit % it varies from 98.x to 99.x.
I think what my problem is that I moved expiration from after reclamation to
before it.  I have changed it back.  Also my problem is right now I need
more tapes drives because I have no window when either backups, or my other
daily processing is going on.
I have 2 more tape drives on order  I hope they get here soon!

Thanks for your help!!

--
Bruce Kamp
Senior Midrange Systems Analyst
Memorial Healthcare System
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597
Pager: (954) 286-9441
Alphapage: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax: (954) 985-1404
--
-Original Message-
From: Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2004 6:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Expiration

Hi Goran!
Well... Bruce's expiration is about 70 objects per second, which is
comparable with mine, but that's not normal, unlike you stated.
According to an IBM support document
(http://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21141810) one should be able
to expire 1055 objects per second!
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines


-Original Message-
From: goran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2004 14:57
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Expiration


hi,
i think this is normal for this number of objects ...


- Original Message -
From: Kamp, Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2004 2:46 PM
Subject: Expiration


 Envirnoment:
 TSM 5.2.1.2 64bit on AIX 5.1

 I am having a problem with expiration taking all night to complete!  Has
 anybody seen this?  Any suggestions?

 04/30/04 22:24:52 ANR0984I Process 302 for EXPIRE INVENTORY started in the
 FOREGROUND at 22:24:52.

 05/01/04 04:46:21 ANR0812I Inventory file expiration process 302
completed:
 examined 1597342 objects, deleting 248883 backup object s, 0 archive
 objects, 0 DB backup volumes, and 0 recovery plan files. 0 errors were
 encountered.


 Thanks,
 -
 Bruce Kamp
 Senior Midrange Systems Analyst
 Memorial Healthcare System
 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597
 Pager: (954) 286-9441
 Alphapage: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Fax: (954) 985-1404
 -


**
For information, services and offers, please visit our web site:
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential
and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may
be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to
this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If
you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately
by return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart
Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be
liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any
attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
**

Expiration

[Kamp, Bruce]

Envirnoment:
TSM 5.2.1.2 64bit on AIX 5.1

I am having a problem with expiration taking all night to complete!  Has
anybody seen this?  Any suggestions?

04/30/04 22:24:52 ANR0984I Process 302 for EXPIRE INVENTORY started in the
FOREGROUND at 22:24:52.

05/01/04 04:46:21 ANR0812I Inventory file expiration process 302 completed:
examined 1597342 objects, deleting 248883 backup object s, 0 archive
objects, 0 DB backup volumes, and 0 recovery plan files. 0 errors were
encountered.


Thanks,
-
Bruce Kamp
Senior Midrange Systems Analyst
Memorial Healthcare System
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597
Pager: (954) 286-9441
Alphapage: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax: (954) 985-1404
-

Query for finding backups in a specific copy pool

[Kamp, Bruce]

I moved a node from 1 mgmt class to another.  The new mgmt class goes to a
different disk pool  offsite copy pool.  I did this about a year ago but
when I do a q occ I still see backups in the old offsite pool.
I did a move nodedata to move the onsite backups then a backup stg pool to
move the backups to the new offsite stgpool.
One I would like to find out what is hanging around in the olld stgpool.
Also any suggestions on how to get rid of it?
This is the setup of the mgmt class:
Versions Data Exists 5
Versions Data Deleted 2
Retain Extra Versions 30
Retain Only Version 60

I am running v5.2.1.2 on AIX  the node in question is AIX 4.3.3 with
5.1.5.11 client.

Thanks,
-
Bruce Kamp
Senior Midrange Systems Analyst
Memorial Healthcare System
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597
Pager: (954) 286-9441
Alphapage: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax: (954) 985-1404
-

Re: Novell NetWare box not backing up SSI

[Kamp, Bruce]

Does the user have the rights to the NDS info?


-
Bruce Kamp
Senior Midrange Systems Analyst
Memorial Healthcare System
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597
Pager: (954) 286-9441
Alphapage: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax: (954) 985-1404
-

-Original Message-
From: Richard Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 1:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Novell NetWare box not backing up SSI

I have a NW5 box that backs up data fine, but even after repeated checks
that it's communicating properly with the TSM server, I get the following
error every time:

04/13/2004 22:32:16 ANS1512E Scheduled event 'ENT-MAIN-NW001' failed.
Return code = 12.
04/14/2004 22:00:22 (TSA500.NLM 5.5 262) This program cannot create a file.
04/14/2004 22:00:23 (TSA500.NLM 5.5 262) This program cannot create a file.
04/14/2004 22:00:23 (TSA500.NLM 5.5 262) This program cannot create a file.
04/14/2004 22:00:24 (TSA500.NLM 5.5 262) This program cannot create a file.
04/14/2004 22:00:24 (TSA500.NLM 5.5 262) This program cannot create a file.
04/14/2004 22:00:25 ANS1228E Sending of object 'Server Specific Info/Server
Specific Info' failed
04/14/2004 22:00:25 ANS4024E Error processing 'Server Specific Info/Server
Specific Info': file write error
04/14/2004 22:00:25 ANS1802E Incremental backup of 'Server Specific
Info/Server Specific Info' finished with 1 failure

Any ideas?

Rich

Rich Taylor
CEIT Server Ops
Clark County Data Center
1670 Pinto Ln
Las Vegas, NV 89106
455-2384
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

When the work is done,
And the paycheck has been spent,
What is left but pride?

Exchange Backup Problem

[Kamp, Bruce]

Environment:
TSM 5.2.1.2 on AIX 5.1
TSM client 5.2.0.3 on Win2k SP4 with TDP Exchange client 5.2.1.0.

I was looking at the exchange log  found this:

03/15/2004 06:34:20 == Log file pruned using log retention
period of 60 day(s)
03/15/2004 06:34:20 == No log entries pruned
03/15/2004 06:34:20
=
03/15/2004 06:34:20 Request   : Backup
03/15/2004 06:34:20 SG List   : *
03/15/2004 06:34:20 Backup Type   : INCREMENTAL
03/15/2004 06:34:20 Database Name :
03/15/2004 06:34:20 Buffers   : 3
03/15/2004 06:34:20 Buffersize: 1024
03/15/2004 06:34:20 Exchange Server   : (Local Machine)
03/15/2004 06:34:20 TSM Node Name :
03/15/2004 06:34:20 TSM Options File  : dsm.opt
03/15/2004 06:34:20 Mount Wait: Yes
03/15/2004 06:34:20 Quiet : No
03/15/2004 06:34:20
-
03/15/2004 06:34:32 Total storage groups requested for backup:  2
03/15/2004 06:34:32 Total storage groups backed up: 2
03/15/2004 06:34:32 Total storage groups expired:   0
03/15/2004 06:34:32 Total storage groups excluded:  0
03/15/2004 06:34:32 Throughput rate:2,233.30
Kb/Sec
03/15/2004 06:34:32 Total bytes transferred:26,214,685
03/15/2004 06:34:32 Elapsed processing time:11.46 Secs
03/15/2004 08:34:20 == Log file pruned using log retention
period of 60 day(s)
03/15/2004 08:34:20 == No log entries pruned
03/15/2004 08:34:20
=
03/15/2004 08:34:20 Request   : Backup
03/15/2004 08:34:20 SG List   : *
03/15/2004 08:34:20 Backup Type   : INCREMENTAL
03/15/2004 08:34:20 Database Name :
03/15/2004 08:34:20 Buffers   : 3
03/15/2004 08:34:20 Buffersize: 1024
03/15/2004 08:34:20 Exchange Server   : (Local Machine)
03/15/2004 08:34:20 TSM Node Name :
03/15/2004 08:34:20 TSM Options File  : dsm.opt
03/15/2004 08:34:20 Mount Wait: Yes
03/15/2004 08:34:20 Quiet : No
03/15/2004 08:34:20
-
03/15/2004 08:34:21 Backup of storage group Directory failed.
03/15/2004 08:34:23 ACN5798E MS Exchange API HRBACKUPPREPARE() failed with
HRESULT: 0xc7ff000a - Unable to perform an incremental backup because a
required Microsoft Exchange database log file could not be found. 03/15/2004
08:34:38 Retrying failed backups...
03/15/2004 08:34:38 Backup of storage group Directory failed.
03/15/2004 08:34:38 ACN5798E MS Exchange API HRBACKUPPREPARE() failed with
HRESULT: 0xc7ff000a - Unable to perform an incremental backup because a
required Microsoft Exchange database log file could not be found. 03/15/2004
08:34:39 Retrying failed backups...
03/15/2004 08:34:39 Backup of storage group Directory failed.
03/15/2004 08:34:39 ACN5798E MS Exchange API HRBACKUPPREPARE() failed with
HRESULT: 0xc7ff000a - Unable to perform an incremental backup because a
required Microsoft Exchange database log file could not be found. 03/15/2004
08:34:39 Retrying failed backups...
03/15/2004 08:34:40 Backup of storage group Directory failed.
03/15/2004 08:34:40 ACN5798E MS Exchange API HRBACKUPPREPARE() failed with
HRESULT: 0xc7ff000a - Unable to perform an incremental backup because a
required Microsoft Exchange database log file could not be found. 03/15/2004
08:34:40 Retrying failed backups...
03/15/2004 08:34:41 Backup of storage group Directory failed.
03/15/2004 08:34:41 ACN5798E MS Exchange API HRBACKUPPREPARE() failed with
HRESULT: 0xc7ff000a - Unable to perform an incremental backup because a
required Microsoft Exchange database log file could not be found. 03/15/2004
08:34:41 Retrying failed backups...
03/15/2004 08:34:41 Total storage groups requested for backup:  2
03/15/2004 08:34:41 Total storage groups backed up: 1
03/15/2004 08:34:41 Total storage groups expired:   0
03/15/2004 08:34:41 Total storage groups excluded:  0
03/15/2004 08:34:41 Throughput rate:1,712.85
Kb/Sec
03/15/2004 08:34:41 Total bytes transferred:26,214,680
03/15/2004 08:34:41 Elapsed processing time:14.95 Secs
03/15/2004 08:34:41 ACN0151E Errors occurred while processing the request.
03/15/2004 10:34:19 == Log file pruned using log retention
period of 60 day(s)

Here is the activity log for this node between these times:

03/15/04 06:35:08 ANE4991I (Session: 8879, Node: MABEXCH01_TDPE)  TDP
MSExc

Re: Exchange Backup Problem

[Kamp, Bruce]

Just ran a full  an incremental after it  they both ran OK..
Go figure.
Forgot to add that it is Exchange 5.5

-
Bruce Kamp
Senior Midrange Systems Analyst
Memorial Healthcare System
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597
Pager: (954) 286-9441
Alphapage: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax: (954) 985-1404
-

-Original Message-
From: Ochs, Duane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 11:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Exchange Backup Problem

Have you tried a full ? I am guessing it will have the same result.
We recently had a similar issue during a full server recovery and our
Exchange group had to take it up with MS support. The DB was saying a
transaction log still existed and the trans log file had already been
deleted.

Duane
-Original Message-
From: Kamp, Bruce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 10:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Exchange Backup Problem


Environment:
TSM 5.2.1.2 on AIX 5.1
TSM client 5.2.0.3 on Win2k SP4 with TDP Exchange client 5.2.1.0.

I was looking at the exchange log  found this:

03/15/2004 06:34:20 == Log file pruned using log retention
period of 60 day(s)
03/15/2004 06:34:20 == No log entries pruned
03/15/2004 06:34:20
=
03/15/2004 06:34:20 Request   : Backup
03/15/2004 06:34:20 SG List   : *
03/15/2004 06:34:20 Backup Type   : INCREMENTAL
03/15/2004 06:34:20 Database Name :
03/15/2004 06:34:20 Buffers   : 3
03/15/2004 06:34:20 Buffersize: 1024
03/15/2004 06:34:20 Exchange Server   : (Local Machine)
03/15/2004 06:34:20 TSM Node Name :
03/15/2004 06:34:20 TSM Options File  : dsm.opt
03/15/2004 06:34:20 Mount Wait: Yes
03/15/2004 06:34:20 Quiet : No
03/15/2004 06:34:20
-
03/15/2004 06:34:32 Total storage groups requested for backup:  2
03/15/2004 06:34:32 Total storage groups backed up: 2
03/15/2004 06:34:32 Total storage groups expired:   0
03/15/2004 06:34:32 Total storage groups excluded:  0
03/15/2004 06:34:32 Throughput rate:2,233.30
Kb/Sec
03/15/2004 06:34:32 Total bytes transferred:26,214,685
03/15/2004 06:34:32 Elapsed processing time:11.46 Secs
03/15/2004 08:34:20 == Log file pruned using log retention
period of 60 day(s)
03/15/2004 08:34:20 == No log entries pruned
03/15/2004 08:34:20
=
03/15/2004 08:34:20 Request   : Backup
03/15/2004 08:34:20 SG List   : *
03/15/2004 08:34:20 Backup Type   : INCREMENTAL
03/15/2004 08:34:20 Database Name :
03/15/2004 08:34:20 Buffers   : 3
03/15/2004 08:34:20 Buffersize: 1024
03/15/2004 08:34:20 Exchange Server   : (Local Machine)
03/15/2004 08:34:20 TSM Node Name :
03/15/2004 08:34:20 TSM Options File  : dsm.opt
03/15/2004 08:34:20 Mount Wait: Yes
03/15/2004 08:34:20 Quiet : No
03/15/2004 08:34:20
-
03/15/2004 08:34:21 Backup of storage group Directory failed.
03/15/2004 08:34:23 ACN5798E MS Exchange API HRBACKUPPREPARE() failed with
HRESULT: 0xc7ff000a - Unable to perform an incremental backup because a
required Microsoft Exchange database log file could not be found. 03/15/2004
08:34:38 Retrying failed backups...
03/15/2004 08:34:38 Backup of storage group Directory failed.
03/15/2004 08:34:38 ACN5798E MS Exchange API HRBACKUPPREPARE() failed with
HRESULT: 0xc7ff000a - Unable to perform an incremental backup because a
required Microsoft Exchange database log file could not be found. 03/15/2004
08:34:39 Retrying failed backups...
03/15/2004 08:34:39 Backup of storage group Directory failed.
03/15/2004 08:34:39 ACN5798E MS Exchange API HRBACKUPPREPARE() failed with
HRESULT: 0xc7ff000a - Unable to perform an incremental backup because a
required Microsoft Exchange database log file could not be found. 03/15/2004
08:34:39 Retrying failed backups...
03/15/2004 08:34:40 Backup of storage group Directory failed.
03/15/2004 08:34:40 ACN5798E MS Exchange API HRBACKUPPREPARE() failed with
HRESULT: 0xc7ff000a - Unable to perform an incremental backup because a
required Microsoft Exchange database log file could not be found. 03/15/2004
08:34:40 Retrying failed backups...
03/15/2004 08:34:41 Backup of storage group Directory failed.
03/15/2004 08:34:41

Re: CAD TSM errors - Win Client on W2003 Server CAD Error

[Kamp, Bruce]

I see this every once in a while.  I usually re-run the setup wizard to
re-write the registry info.


-
Bruce Kamp
Senior Midrange Systems Analyst
Memorial Healthcare System
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597
Pager: (954) 286-9441
Alphapage: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax: (954) 985-1404
-

-Original Message-
From: Charlie Hurtubise [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 11:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: CAD TSM errors - Win Client on W2003 Server CAD Error
Importance: High

Nagy,

I submitted this error help request in January, but got little response..
probably because no one experienced it yet. I'm a brand new TSM users so all
is new.. and our Win servers are all at 2003 now. One response came through
but it was something I had already tried. But I think being pioneers with
2003  the latest TSM, we are just getting arrows in the back (including you
now). IBM may help, but I haven't changed IBM Tivoli support to my name yet
from an ex employee. This only effects remote webaccess to do
backups/restores (via port 1581), but local or terminal services access on
the 2003 sever console work fine. It appears it may be just a registry fix
CadSchedName registry value is empty ?

Page 17 in the Dec-03 5.2.2 manual, or page 14 in the older 5.2 manual
Configuring the Web Client lists the steps. I have to now turn the CAD
service off after or it tries to start it every 10 minutes.. see
dsmerror.log.

Anyway, I just updated my Win2003 server to TSM Windows Client version
5.2.2.5 (connecting with a Linux 5.2.2.1 TSM server, but this doesn't
matter) and still the same error. It appears like this in the TSM
dsmerror.log...

03/04/2004 14:59:58 Error starting schedule service: CadSchedName registry
value is empty
03/04/2004 14:59:58 ANS1977E Dsmcad schedule invocation was unsuccessful -
will try again.
03/04/2004 15:09:58 Error starting schedule service: CadSchedName registry
value is empty
03/04/2004 15:09:58 ANS1977E Dsmcad schedule invocation was unsuccessful -
will try again.
03/04/2004 15:19:58 Error starting schedule service: CadSchedName registry
value is empty
03/04/2004 15:19:58 ANS1977E Dsmcad schedule invocation was unsuccessful -
will try again.

Here's the original e-mail.

Thanks
Charlie Hurtubise
Tecsys Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-

From: Charlie Hurtubise

Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 1:38 PM

To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'

Subject: Win Client on W2003 Server CAD Error

Importance: High

Hello.

Getting CAD Service start-up errors on a Win 2003 Server for Client data
Backup only. Anyone else have experience here or IBM?

Details...

I have installed TMS Client 5.2.2 on a new Win2003 server to backup non C:
disk data. All is fine except when I try to use the CAD daemon (service),
page 14 in the Tivoli 5.2 Users Guide for Windows Configuring the Web
Client. This is to access Tivoli on the W2003 server via http 1581 to do
restores. The W2003 GUI Tivoli NT console client works fine and the auto
backups work fine using the regular Win service with and without the
MANAGEDSERVICES setup in dsm.opt.

I have tried the auto web access setup way using the console GUI client
(page 14) and the manual way (page 482).

When trying the http 1581 access, all starts up well until you have to
login, then you receive on your browser screen

...ANS2619S The Client Acceptor Daemon was unable to start the Remote Client
Agent

in the dsmerror.log as follows...

01/12/2004 16:10:48 Error starting agent service: The service name, '', is
invalid.

01/12/2004 16:10:48 Error starting Remote Client Agent.

01/12/2004 16:10:59 Error starting agent service: The service name, '', is
invalid.

01/12/2004 16:10:59 Error starting Remote Client Agent.

01/12/2004 16:23:01 Error starting schedule service: CadSchedName registry
value is empty

01/12/2004 16:23:01 ANS1977E Dsmcad schedule invocation was unsuccessful -
will try again.

01/12/2004 16:24:37 Error starting agent service: The service name, '', is
invalid.

01/12/2004 16:24:37 Error starting Remote Client Agent.

01/12/2004 16:25:44 ConsoleEventHandler(): Caught Ctrl-C console event .

01/12/2004 16:25:44 ConsoleEventHandler(): Cleaning up and terminating
Process ...

In dsmwebcl.log ...

Executing scheduled command now.

01/09/2004 20:47:24 (dsmcad) ANS1977E Dsmcad schedule invocation was
unsuccessful - will try again.

in 10 minutes.

01/09/2004 20:47:24 (dsmcad) Time remaining until execution:

I'm thinking this is a new bug in 5.2.2 for Windows, maybe just on Win2003?
I'm using 5.2.2 TSM server on a Linux ES 2.1 kernel 27 server. Other Linux
5.2.2 clients work fine via http 1581.

Thanks a bunch...

Charlie Hurtubise

Tecsys Inc.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Nagy, Christine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 9:28 AM
To: Charlie 

Re: Windows XP, ASR, and ANS1468E

[Kamp, Bruce]

The qmgr0.dat  qmgr1.dat are the files used by windows auto update service.
I exclude these from backup or I turn off auto update service.
The rest look like files that make up the user profile.  I personally
exclude these also.  I have no need to restore them.


-
Bruce Kamp
Senior Midrange Systems Analyst
Memorial Healthcare System
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597
Pager: (954) 286-9441
Alphapage: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax: (954) 985-1404
-

-Original Message-
From: Matt Zufelt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 10:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Windows XP, ASR, and ANS1468E

I have a Windows XP SP1 PC that is reporting that backup has failed each
night (return code=12).  Examining the dsmerror.log seems to indicate that
the problem occurs when the system tries to backup the automated system
recovery (ASR) files.  I get the following two error messages:

03/08/2004 00:03:57 ANS1228E Sending of object 'C:' failed
03/08/2004 00:03:57 ANS1468E Backing up Automated System Recovery (ASR)
files failed.  No files will be backed up.

If I try to run the ASR backup manually (backup asr via the command-line), I
get the same error message.  I've searched the archive of this list and also
the TSM support page @ IBM and have not found anything that can help me
solve this problem.  I'm hoping somebody here can help.  Client is version
5.2.2.0 (on Windows XP SP1) and the server is 5.2.2.3 (on AIX 5).

A complete copy of the error log from last night's backup follows my sig.

Thanks in advance for any help!

Matt Zufelt
Southern Utah University


---last night's dsmerror.log output-
03/08/2004 00:00:01 ANS1228E Sending of object '\\xpsp1pc\c$\Documents and
Settings\All Users\Application Data\Microsoft\Network\Downloader\qmgr0.dat'
failed
03/08/2004 00:00:01 ANS4987E Error processing '\\xpsp1pc\c$\Documents and
Settings\All Users\Application Data\Microsoft\Network\Downloader\qmgr0.dat':
the object is in use by another process
03/08/2004 00:00:01 ANS1228E Sending of object '\\xpsp1pc\c$\Documents and
Settings\All Users\Application Data\Microsoft\Network\Downloader\qmgr1.dat'
failed
03/08/2004 00:00:01 ANS4987E Error processing '\\xpsp1pc\c$\Documents and
Settings\All Users\Application Data\Microsoft\Network\Downloader\qmgr1.dat':
the object is in use by another process
03/08/2004 00:00:02 ANS1228E Sending of object '\\xpsp1pc\c$\Documents and
Settings\LocalService\NTUSER.DAT' failed
03/08/2004 00:00:02 ANS4987E Error processing '\\xpsp1pc\c$\Documents and
Settings\LocalService\NTUSER.DAT': the object is in use by another process
03/08/2004 00:00:02 ANS1228E Sending of object '\\xpsp1pc\c$\Documents and
Settings\LocalService\ntuser.dat.LOG' failed
03/08/2004 00:00:02 ANS4987E Error processing '\\xpsp1pc\c$\Documents and
Settings\LocalService\ntuser.dat.LOG': the object is in use by another
process
03/08/2004 00:00:02 ANS1228E Sending of object '\\xpsp1pc\c$\Documents and
Settings\LocalService\Local Settings\Application
Data\Microsoft\Windows\UsrClass.dat' failed
03/08/2004 00:00:02 ANS4987E Error processing '\\xpsp1pc\c$\Documents and
Settings\LocalService\Local Settings\Application
Data\Microsoft\Windows\UsrClass.dat': the object is in use by another
process
03/08/2004 00:00:02 ANS1228E Sending of object '\\xpsp1pc\c$\Documents and
Settings\LocalService\Local Settings\Application
Data\Microsoft\Windows\UsrClass.dat.LOG' failed
03/08/2004 00:00:02 ANS4987E Error processing '\\xpsp1pc\c$\Documents and
Settings\LocalService\Local Settings\Application
Data\Microsoft\Windows\UsrClass.dat.LOG': the object is in use by another
process
03/08/2004 00:00:02 ANS1228E Sending of object '\\xpsp1pc\c$\Documents and
Settings\NetworkService\NTUSER.DAT' failed
03/08/2004 00:00:02 ANS4987E Error processing '\\xpsp1pc\c$\Documents and
Settings\NetworkService\NTUSER.DAT': the object is in use by another process
03/08/2004 00:00:02 ANS1228E Sending of object '\\xpsp1pc\c$\Documents and
Settings\NetworkService\ntuser.dat.LOG' failed
03/08/2004 00:00:02 ANS4987E Error processing '\\xpsp1pc\c$\Documents and
Settings\NetworkService\ntuser.dat.LOG': the object is in use by another
process
03/08/2004 00:00:02 ANS1228E Sending of object '\\xpsp1pc\c$\Documents and
Settings\NetworkService\Local Settings\Application
Data\Microsoft\Windows\UsrClass.dat' failed
03/08/2004 00:00:02 ANS4987E Error processing '\\xpsp1pc\c$\Documents and
Settings\NetworkService\Local Settings\Application
Data\Microsoft\Windows\UsrClass.dat': the object is in use by another
process
03/08/2004 00:00:02 ANS1228E Sending of object '\\xpsp1pc\c$\Documents and
Settings\NetworkService\Local Settings\Application
Data\Microsoft\Windows\UsrClass.dat.LOG' failed
03/08/2004 00:00:02 ANS4987E Error processing '\\xpsp1pc\c$\Documents and
Settings\NetworkService\Local Settings\Application
Data\Microsoft\Windows\UsrClass.dat.LOG': 

Re: TSM Operational Reporting - about TDP for Exchange...

[Kamp, Bruce]

What I did was create another report that goes through the activity log
looking for ANE4993E.
Anybody know of any other error messages I need to be looking for?


Thanks,
-
Bruce Kamp
Senior Midrange Systems Analyst
Memorial Healthcare System
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597
Pager: (954) 286-9441
Alphapage: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax: (954) 985-1404
-

-Original Message-
From: Bill Boyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 11:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM Operational Reporting - about TDP for Exchange...

The command script you run for the TDPExchange needs to complete with the
correct return code. If you are using the sample, this should be the return
code from txpexcc.exe. Some of the TDP sample scripts run this by the start
/b command. This will put the command in the background and return right
away instead of waiting for the TDP command to complete. For my Windows
scripts I use a coding convention like...

set LASTCC=0
set MAXCC=0
some commands...
set LASTCC=%ERRORLEVEL%
if %LASCC% GTR %MAXCC% set MAXCC=%LASTCC%
some more commands
REM Now exit with the highest condition code encountered
exit %MAXCC%


If you don't exit with a specific code, then whatever the value of
ERRORLEVEL is, is the return for the command file and the completion of the
event in TSM.

Look in the command script, remove any start /B and if the TDP command is
not the last line of the script, you need to add some code like above to
return the correct status.

Bill Boyer
DSS, Inc.

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Mol, ATM
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 10:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM Operational Reporting - about TDP for Exchange...


As far as I know, under Windows it's just a matter of reporting back the
right errorlevel.
I experienced also a problem with the TDP for Oracle (Rman) reporting.
In both cases I had to set the returned errorlevel (by the script) from 3 to
2 to get the TSM-server report the failed backup.
In a Windows batch something like find uihghuks NUL  will give you that
%errorlevel%

Ton Mol
Corus Steel BV

  -Original Message-
 From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]@CORUS   On
 Behalf Of Rajesh Oak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: vrijdag 20 februari 2004 13:40
 To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject:  Re: TSM Operational Reporting - some answers...

 The Operational Reporting seems to be working fine at my site.
 The only flaw is in the report for the Exchange Backup.
 Since we execute a batch file which kicks off the Exchange backup, the
 client summary shows successful everytime the batch file is executed
 successfully. After that it has no idea if the actual backup fails. Wierd
 thing is for SQL backups we do the same thing but it looks for errors in
 the actual SQL backups and reports it in the client schedule summary.
 Hope this is fixed ASAP because now I have to run a script which looks for
 the Exchange backup seperately.


 Rajesh Oak
 Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan
 --

 - Original Message -

 DATE: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 09:27:04
 From: Warren, Matthew (Retail) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc:

 Does the Operational reporting tool actually work properly now? As far
 as I was aware it was 'broken' in that is used the TSM summary table to
 gather data, and this table is currently unreliable for client backups?
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: David McClelland
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]@EME
 Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 6:46 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: TSM Operational Reporting - some answers...
 
 
 Hi Lawrence,
 
 TSM Operational Reporting is, in itself, self-contained.
 No
 DB2/Oracle/obscure-COTS/Tivoli Framework required, all
 you need is a TSM
 Server somewhere to point it at. It's a doddle to
 install, no really, it
 is. From double clicking the install file to getting
 some genuinely
 useful reports in less than 15 minutes.
 
 In terms of limitations, I think I read somewhere that
 as of the GA
 release, you cannot actually install TSM Operational
 Reporting on a TSM
 Server - it has to be a separate box somewhere, and it
 has to be
 installed in a Windows 2000 or above server (i.e. not
 NT4). I have it
 running on a very low powered workstation at the moment,
 and it does its
 job just fine.
 
 What you refer to below is an 'extra', in that if you
 *want* you can
 output logs to a logfile, and have a Tivoli Logfile
 Adapter scrape the
 log and forward on any pertinent events (such as tape
 

Re: TSM Operational Reporting Information - part 2 of 2

[Kamp, Bruce]

I can't comment on the Windows 2003 server but I am running TOR on my WinXP
workstation.  My TSM server is 5.2.0.0 on AIX 5.1  it works great.


-
Bruce Kamp
Senior Midrange Systems Analyst
Memorial Healthcare System
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597
Pager: (954) 286-9441
Alphapage: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax: (954) 985-1404
-

-Original Message-
From: Bill Fitzgerald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004 8:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM Operational Reporting Information - part 2 of 2

Please clarify something for me.

I am running TSM 5.2.13 on an AIX 5.1 system
TOR would be running on a Win2003 server

is the GA version of TSM Operational Reporting compatible with this set
up


 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/20/04 02:32AM 
Here is some download information for TSM operational reporting.

Documentation:

Note that the PowerPoint presentation (same one that's been available)
located with the migration tool ref below is still a good source of
info.  The readme that goes with the 5.2.2 (tsmrept_readme.txt)
version is a good source and so is the online help that goes with the
migration tool - has some useful QA's. Operational reporting is also
covered in the quick start and admin guide for 5.2.2 available at:

http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/tividd/td/IBMTivoliStorageManagerforWindows5.2
.2.html

Download Information:

Operational reporting is included with TSM 5.2.2 as part of the
Windows TSM server packaging.  You can get it via the tivoli web site
under the 5.2.2 windows downloads or directly from the ftp site at:

ftp://service.boulder.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management/maintenance/
server/v5r2/WIN/LATEST/

The standalone operational reporting package is named
tsmcon5220_win.exe.  It is also included in the TSM Windows server and
Windows storage agent packages.  If operational reporting is to run on
the same machine as a TSM Windows server or storage agent you'll need
to upgrade the server or storage agent to 5.2.2 as (unlike the beta)
the standalone version can't be installed on the same machine as a TSM
server or storage agent. If you want to install operational reporting
on any other windows machine you should install the standalone version.

NOTE: The TSM 5.2.2.2 patch includes fixes a nested HTML table problem,
color coding in client schedule section, and text formatting issues. You
may want to apply this patch or just install it to begin with.

IC38910 TSM OPERATIONAL REPORTING PRODUCES NESTED TABLES IN HTML IF
- IC38910 5698ISMSV 52W
IC38913 TSM OPERATIONAL REPORTING TEXT FORMATTING ISSUES.
- IC38913 5698ISMSV 52W

ftp://service.boulder.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management/patches/serv
er/NT/5.2.2.2
/

Migration:

If you have been using the beta or technology preview version of
operational reporting there is a migration tool available at the
following location.

ftp://service.boulder.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management/techprev/tsm
opreport/latest/

The migration package is named tsmmigrate.exe and there is a
readme_migrate.txt file there too that describes how to get started.
When you start the migration tool a detailed help file will be
displayed that covers details as well as some common questions and
answers - including a good description of using the windows scheduler
to get better scheduling granularity.

Best Regards,

Mike Collins
Tivoli Storage Product Architecture
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Vendor request for a backup tape

[Kamp, Bruce]

I have a request from one of our vendors to send a TSM tape with a specific
SQL DB on it.  If I send it to them would they be able to read it from there
TSM server?

Thanks,

-
Bruce Kamp
Senior Midrange Systems Analyst
Memorial Healthcare System
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597
Pager: (954) 286-9441
Alphapage: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax: (954) 985-1404
-

TSM Operational Report Question

[Kamp, Bruce]

Trying to setup a new report.  What I can't figure out how to do is specify
in the query to use the time I have requested.  I have it set to time start
5:30AM Hours covered 24.


Thanks,
-
Bruce Kamp
Senior Midrange Systems Analyst
Memorial Healthcare System
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597
Pager: (954) 286-9441
Alphapage: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax: (954) 985-1404
-

Re: Error in DSMERROR.log

[Kamp, Bruce]

The problem is I'm above that level 5.2.0.3.  The article talks about
version 5.2.0.1.


-
Bruce Kamp
Senior Midrange Systems Analyst
Memorial Healthcare System
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597
Pager: (954) 286-9441
Alphapage: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax: (954) 985-1404
-

-Original Message-
From: Warren, Matthew (Retail) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 6:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Error in DSMERROR.log

Hallo,

A search for

psNpPeek

at www.ibm.com (search box top right of page) returns 3 items, the third
looks promising .. :-)

Matt.

-Original Message-
From: Kamp, Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED]@EME
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 12:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Error in DSMERROR.log


Envirnment:
Windows 2000 SP4 with TSM client version 5.2.0.3
TSM server version is 5.2.0.0 on AIX 5.1.

I have been seeing the following error on onre of my
Windows 2000 nodes:

02/17/2004 01:11:33 processSysvol():
NtFrsApiGetBackupRestoreSets(): RC = 2
02/17/2004 01:11:33 processSysvol():
NtFrsApiDestroyBackupRestore(): RC = 0
02/17/2004 01:45:45 psNpPeek(): Timed out waiting for 4
bytes to arrive on
pipe.
02/17/2004 01:45:55 psNpPeek(): Timed out waiting for 4
bytes to arrive on
pipe.
02/17/2004 01:46:05 psNpPeek(): Timed out waiting for 4
bytes to arrive on
pipe.
02/17/2004 01:46:15 psNpPeek(): Timed out waiting for 4
bytes to arrive on
pipe.
02/17/2004 01:46:25 psNpPeek(): Timed out waiting for 4
bytes to arrive on
pipe.

Has anybody else seen this?

Thanks,
-
Bruce Kamp
Senior Midrange Systems Analyst
Memorial Healthcare System
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597
Pager: (954) 286-9441
Alphapage:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax: (954) 985-1404
-


___ Disclaimer Notice __
This message and any attachments are confidential and should only be read
by those to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient,
please contact us, delete the message from your computer and destroy any
copies. Any distribution or copying without our prior permission is
prohibited.

Internet communications are not always secure and therefore the Powergen
Group does not accept legal responsibility for this message. The recipient
is responsible for verifying its authenticity before acting on the
contents. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author
and do not necessarily represent those of the Powergen Group.

Registered addresses:

Powergen UK plc, 53 New Broad Street, London, EC2M 1SL
Registered in England  Wales No. 2366970

Powergen Retail Limited,  Westwood Way, Westwood Business Park,
Coventry CV4 8LG.
Registered in England and Wales No: 3407430

Telephone +44 (0) 2476 42 4000
Fax   +44 (0) 2476 42 5432

Re: Error in DSMERROR.log

[Kamp, Bruce]

Thanks I missed the JNLINBNPTIMEOUT setting.
One other thing I noticed that my journal DB is over 2Gig.  Could this be
the cause of the timeout?


-
Bruce Kamp
Senior Midrange Systems Analyst
Memorial Healthcare System
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597
Pager: (954) 286-9441
Alphapage: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax: (954) 985-1404
-

-Original Message-
From: Andrew Raibeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 8:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Error in DSMERROR.log

Bruce,

5.2.0.1 or 5.2.0.3  not important.

I suggest you carefully re-read the article. If it still doesn't make
sense, post again and quote the part(s) you don't understand so we can
clarify.

Regards,

Andy

Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The command line is your friend.
Good enough is the enemy of excellence.



Kamp, Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
02/19/2004 06:06
Please respond to
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager


To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc

Subject
Re: Error in DSMERROR.log






The problem is I'm above that level 5.2.0.3.  The article talks about
version 5.2.0.1.


-
Bruce Kamp
Senior Midrange Systems Analyst
Memorial Healthcare System
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597
Pager: (954) 286-9441
Alphapage: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax: (954) 985-1404
-

-Original Message-
From: Warren, Matthew (Retail) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 6:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Error in DSMERROR.log

Hallo,

A search for

psNpPeek

at www.ibm.com (search box top right of page) returns 3 items, the third
looks promising .. :-)

Matt.

-Original Message-
From: Kamp, Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED]@EME
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 12:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Error in DSMERROR.log


Envirnment:
Windows 2000 SP4 with TSM client version 5.2.0.3
TSM server version is 5.2.0.0 on AIX 5.1.

I have been seeing the following error on onre of my
Windows 2000 nodes:

02/17/2004 01:11:33 processSysvol():
NtFrsApiGetBackupRestoreSets(): RC = 2
02/17/2004 01:11:33 processSysvol():
NtFrsApiDestroyBackupRestore(): RC = 0
02/17/2004 01:45:45 psNpPeek(): Timed out waiting for 4
bytes to arrive on
pipe.
02/17/2004 01:45:55 psNpPeek(): Timed out waiting for 4
bytes to arrive on
pipe.
02/17/2004 01:46:05 psNpPeek(): Timed out waiting for 4
bytes to arrive on
pipe.
02/17/2004 01:46:15 psNpPeek(): Timed out waiting for 4
bytes to arrive on
pipe.
02/17/2004 01:46:25 psNpPeek(): Timed out waiting for 4
bytes to arrive on
pipe.

Has anybody else seen this?

Thanks,
-
Bruce Kamp
Senior Midrange Systems Analyst
Memorial Healthcare System
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597
Pager: (954) 286-9441
Alphapage:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax: (954) 985-1404
-


___ Disclaimer Notice __
This message and any attachments are confidential and should only be read
by those to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended
recipient,
please contact us, delete the message from your computer and destroy any
copies. Any distribution or copying without our prior permission is
prohibited.

Internet communications are not always secure and therefore the Powergen
Group does not accept legal responsibility for this message. The recipient
is responsible for verifying its authenticity before acting on the
contents. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author
and do not necessarily represent those of the Powergen Group.

Registered addresses:

Powergen UK plc, 53 New Broad Street, London, EC2M 1SL
Registered in England  Wales No. 2366970

Powergen Retail Limited,  Westwood Way, Westwood Business Park,
Coventry CV4 8LG.
Registered in England and Wales No: 3407430

Telephone +44 (0) 2476 42 4000
Fax   +44 (0) 2476 42 5432

Error in DSMERROR.log

[Kamp, Bruce]

Envirnment:
Windows 2000 SP4 with TSM client version 5.2.0.3
TSM server version is 5.2.0.0 on AIX 5.1.

I have been seeing the following error on onre of my Windows 2000 nodes:

02/17/2004 01:11:33 processSysvol(): NtFrsApiGetBackupRestoreSets(): RC = 2
02/17/2004 01:11:33 processSysvol(): NtFrsApiDestroyBackupRestore(): RC = 0
02/17/2004 01:45:45 psNpPeek(): Timed out waiting for 4 bytes to arrive on
pipe.
02/17/2004 01:45:55 psNpPeek(): Timed out waiting for 4 bytes to arrive on
pipe.
02/17/2004 01:46:05 psNpPeek(): Timed out waiting for 4 bytes to arrive on
pipe.
02/17/2004 01:46:15 psNpPeek(): Timed out waiting for 4 bytes to arrive on
pipe.
02/17/2004 01:46:25 psNpPeek(): Timed out waiting for 4 bytes to arrive on
pipe.

Has anybody else seen this?

Thanks,
-
Bruce Kamp
Senior Midrange Systems Analyst
Memorial Healthcare System
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597
Pager: (954) 286-9441
Alphapage:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax: (954) 985-1404
-

Re: Anyone see this error before?

[Kamp, Bruce]

Look in C:\winnt  you will find a file with a non standard name.  On my
servers the name was a box.  Never quite figured out what was creating the
file  To me it looks like TSM is seeing that file as being named in a
language other then US/English.
Delete that file  they will be OK.


-
Bruce Kamp
Senior Midrange Systems Analyst
Memorial Healthcare System
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597
Pager: (954) 286-9441
Alphapage: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax: (954) 985-1404
-

-Original Message-
From: Roger Nadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 8:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Anyone see this error before?

We have finished the upgrade of ou clients to 5.1.5.15 to correct lost
session errors and W2K client errors for scheduler service stoppages, but
now see the following error:

02/16/2004 11:32:18 fioScanDirEntry(): Can't map object 'C:\WINNT\?' into
the local ANSI codepage, skipping ...

Anyone got any ideas We are now seeing it on all clients that have been
upgraded.
___

Roger Nadler
Manager Plant Engineering/Network Technologies
Office (856) 582-3212
Fax (856) 256-2901


Text Messaging:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sony Disc Manufacturing
400 North Woodbury Road
Pitman, NJ 08071
___

Re: TSM 5.2 performances on AIX 5.1

[Kamp, Bruce]

I was hit by this when I switched to gigabit.  Took some work with my
network guys  IBM to get all the settings correct.  The performance
difference was incredible.


-
Bruce Kamp
Senior Midrange Systems Analyst
Memorial Healthcare System
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597
Pager: (954) 286-9441
Alphapage:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax: (954) 985-1404
-


-Original Message-
From: PINNI, BALANAND (SBCSI) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 12:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM 5.2 performances on AIX 5.1

What is ur NIC speed set to. Did u enable or change MTU if yes set it back
to 1500 .Since 9000 needs to be changed on Switch also .It depends kind of
engine u have on CISCO switch.

Thanks
Balanand Pinni

-Original Message-
From: Madalina Cozea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 11:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TSM 5.2 performances on AIX 5.1


Hello everybody,
I need some info regarding the performances of a TSM on AIX urgent ,if any
of u could help , because i'm experiencing some problems.
I've installed TSM 5.2 on a AIX box (5.1 64 bits) and left all the default
parameters .
The performances over a Gbit network are poor , backups of 4 GB taking over
35min (5.1.5 AIX client) . There is no load on server , the disk is busy 5%
.
Do u have any  idea what could causing poor performance and what can be done
?
thanks,
Mada

Re: TSM administration through web gui

[Kamp, Bruce]

I use the web GUI all the time with no problems.
I'm running it on AIX 5.1


-
Bruce Kamp
Senior Midrange Systems Analyst
Memorial Healthcare System
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597
Pager: (954) 286-9441
Alphapage:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax: (954) 985-1404
-


-Original Message-
From: Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 10:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM administration through web gui

What platform ?

My TSM server on AIX at 5.2.0.0 is working just fine.  In fact, I am really
glad they addresses the problems their code caused when using MOZILLA !





Yiannakis Vakis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
02/02/2004 08:31 AM
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager


To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:TSM administration through web gui


Hi,
I have upgraded to TSM 5.2.00.
Since the upgrade, the web gui administration is too slow. Has anyone
noticed a similar situation ?
If so, did you resolve to the problem and how?
Thanks
Yianakis

Re: TSM 5.2.1 questions

[Kamp, Bruce]

I also just upgraded to 5.2.1.2 on AIX.
The operational monitor seems to be working OK for me.


-
Bruce Kamp
Midrange Systems Analyst II
Memorial Healthcare System
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597
Pager: (954) 286-9441
Alphapage:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax: (954) 985-1404
-


-Original Message-
From: Bill Fitzgerald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 1:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TSM 5.2.1 questions

I just upgraded my system to TSM 5.2.1.3 on AIX 5.1

I have a few questions that maybe you all can help me with.

1. Is the operational monitoring tool available for this release? I cant
seem to find it or any reference to it

2. I didn't get a copy of the system documentation on CD like I did with
5.1.5 any idea why? where can I get the documentation?

3. Any idea when IBM/Tivoli will fix the problem with the q proc display?

Thanks for your help in advance

Bill

William Fitzgerald
Software Programmer
TSM Administrator
Munson Medical Center
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Upgraded to TSM 5.2.1.2

[Kamp, Bruce]

I just upgraded to TSM 5.2.1.2 from 5.1.1.6 on AIX 5.1ML5 64bit.
One thing I noticed is that when I do a Q PR it is not formated correctly
on the screen.  Has anybody else seen  this  is there a fix for it?  Also
is there anything else I need to watch out for?

Thanks,
-
Bruce Kamp
Midrange Systems Analyst II
Memorial Healthcare System
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597
Pager: (954) 286-9441
Alphapage:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax: (954) 985-1404
-

TDPOSYNC

[Kamp, Bruce]

I want to run TDPOSYNC on one of my Oracle DB's.
TSM ver is 5.2.1.2 on AIX 5.1.  TDP ver 2.2.0 with Oracle 8.1.6  8.1.7 on
AIX 4.3.3.
I have noticed that the old backups  archivelog backups are not being
expired.  These is my settings:

Policy Domain Name C1_ORA_AGENT
Policy Set Name ACTIVE
Mgmt Class Name C1_ORACLE_MGMT_CLASS
Copy Group Name STANDARD
Versions Data Exists 1
Versions Data Deleted 0
Retain Extra Versions 1
Retain Only Version 0
Copy Mode MODIFIED
Copy Serialization SHRSTATIC
Copy Frequency 0
Copy Destination C1_ORA_DISK_POOL

Are these correct  is there anything I need to watch out for running the
TDPOSYNC.  I am running an RMAN delete every weekend  the output shows RMAN
deleting old backups.

Thanks,
-
Bruce Kamp
Midrange Systems Analyst II
Memorial Healthcare System
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597
Pager: (954) 286-9441
Alphapage:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax: (954) 985-1404
-

Re: TDPOSYNC

[Kamp, Bruce]

Yes


-
Bruce Kamp
Midrange Systems Analyst II
Memorial Healthcare System
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597
Pager: (954) 286-9441
Alphapage:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax: (954) 985-1404
-


-Original Message-
From: Hooft, Jeroen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 8:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TDPOSYNC

Did you set Backdelete=yes in the node definition?



-Original Message-
From: Kamp, Bruce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: woensdag 10 december 2003 14:06
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TDPOSYNC


I want to run TDPOSYNC on one of my Oracle DB's.
TSM ver is 5.2.1.2 on AIX 5.1.  TDP ver 2.2.0 with Oracle 8.1.6  8.1.7 on
AIX 4.3.3.
I have noticed that the old backups  archivelog backups are not being
expired.  These is my settings:

Policy Domain Name C1_ORA_AGENT
Policy Set Name ACTIVE
Mgmt Class Name C1_ORACLE_MGMT_CLASS
Copy Group Name STANDARD
Versions Data Exists 1
Versions Data Deleted 0
Retain Extra Versions 1
Retain Only Version 0
Copy Mode MODIFIED
Copy Serialization SHRSTATIC
Copy Frequency 0
Copy Destination C1_ORA_DISK_POOL

Are these correct  is there anything I need to watch out for running the
TDPOSYNC.  I am running an RMAN delete every weekend  the output shows RMAN
deleting old backups.

Thanks,
-
Bruce Kamp
Midrange Systems Analyst II
Memorial Healthcare System
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597
Pager: (954) 286-9441
Alphapage:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax: (954) 985-1404
-

Re: Upgraded to TSM 5.2.1.2

[Kamp, Bruce]

Yes

 tivoli.tsm.msg.en_US.server
 5.2.0.0C FIBM Tivoli Storage
Manager
   Server Messages, US
English



-
Bruce Kamp
Midrange Systems Analyst II
Memorial Healthcare System
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597
Pager: (954) 286-9441
Alphapage:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax: (954) 985-1404
-


-Original Message-
From: Hooft, Jeroen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 8:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Upgraded to TSM 5.2.1.2

I have seen this during upgrade to 5.1.1 Did you install using ALL
AVAILABLE SOFTWARE in smitty?
You might miss the messages-file. (tivoli.tsm.msg.en_US.server)




-Original Message-
From: Kamp, Bruce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: woensdag 10 december 2003 13:58
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Upgraded to TSM 5.2.1.2


I just upgraded to TSM 5.2.1.2 from 5.1.1.6 on AIX 5.1ML5 64bit.
One thing I noticed is that when I do a Q PR it is not formated correctly
on the screen.  Has anybody else seen  this  is there a fix for it?  Also
is there anything else I need to watch out for?

Thanks,
-
Bruce Kamp
Midrange Systems Analyst II
Memorial Healthcare System
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597
Pager: (954) 286-9441
Alphapage:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax: (954) 985-1404
-

NDS Backup error

[Kamp, Bruce]

I am backing up my NDS tree on one server but I keep getting the following
errors:

12/09/2003 20:14:52 ANS1228E Sending of object '.[Root].O=SBHD.OU=ICU3'
failed
12/09/2003 20:14:52 ANS1304W Active object not found

12/09/2003 20:14:52 ANS1228E Sending of object
'.[Root].O=SBHD.OU=MEMORIAL_CLUBHOUSE' failed
12/09/2003 20:14:52 ANS1304W Active object not found

These OU's no longer exist in our NDS tree.  Is this a TSM problem or NDS?

The TSM client is 5.1.5.6 on Netware 6 SP2.

Thanks,
-
Bruce Kamp
Midrange Systems Analyst II
Memorial Healthcare System
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597
Pager: (954) 286-9441
Alphapage:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax: (954) 985-1404
-

Upgrade to AIX 5.1 then TSM 5.2.1.2 or 5.2.1.3

[Kamp, Bruce]

Next week I will be upgrading my AIX TSM server to AIX 5.1 ML5 currently
running TSM 5.1.1.6 32bit.  I also want to switch from 32 to 64bit.  I know
that I need to uninstall tivoli.tsm.devices.aix43.rte.  Also that I need to
install/upgrade TSM 64bit.  To accomplish this do I need to unistall 32 bit
TSM  reinstall the 64bit or just run the install of 64bit?  If I need to
unistall TSM 32bit can this be done before the AIX upgrade?  My plan is to
uninstall the tsm.devices.aix43.rte put the AIX CD in  reboot into the AIX
install.

Then a week or 2 after that I will be upgrading TSM.  Is anybody running
5.2.1.2 on AIX?  If so are there any major or minor problems to watch out
for?  Also is there a DB upgrade going from 5.1.1.6 to 5.2.1.2 or 5.2.1.3?


Thanks,
-
Bruce Kamp
Midrange Systems Analyst II
Memorial Healthcare System
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597
Pager: (954) 286-9441
Alphapage:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax: (954) 985-1404
-

Upgrade LAN FREE Licensing Question

[Kamp, Bruce]

In the process of bringing a SAN into my environment.  I know I need a lan
free client but is there a new piece that I need to purchase for the TSM
server side?  Also is the lan free client the only piece that I need for the
client side or does it require a backup client?

Thanks,
--
Bruce Kamp
Midrange Systems Analyst II
Memorial Healthcare System
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P: (954) 987-2020 x4597
F: (954) 985-1404
---

Re: Antwort: Re: Netware issue: Can't write files during restore ...

[Kamp, Bruce]

The only time I have seen this is when people have tried to restore files
from a compressed volume to a non-compressed volume or NSS to non. 


--
Bruce Kamp
Midrange Systems Analyst II
Memorial Healthcare System
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
P: (954) 987-2020 x4597
F: (954) 985-1404
---


-Original Message-
From: Markus Veit [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 5:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hi all,
we have the same problem, but there is more to it.
Netware 5.1 SP6, files can not be written, no error code.
we (Netware admin) went through all possibillitis, access rights, volume
limitations, user limitations etc, it's not explainable!

Now here is the next problem.
TSM 5.1.7.3 AIX 5.1 ML3 and AIX 4.3.3 ML9
TSM Client 5.1.5.6  restore with resourceutilization more than 2  and
maxnummp=resourceutil + 1 CORE DUMPS the server every time!!!
Call has been opened with TSM support

Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards

Markus Veit




   
   
   
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kopie: 
Thema:   Re: Netware issue:
Can't write files during restore...
   
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   
  Received :  07.10.2003   
  23:05
  Bitte antworten an ADSM:
  Dist Stor Manager   
   
   




Hi leonard, Charles, Mark...

The files fail during the restore, and it's not a case of it
terminating early and giving us a false positive.

User Quotas is a possibility -- users are limited to 10MB, so anyone
with more than 5MB could conceivably have their restore fail.  I'll
talk to the admin about temporarily lifting the limits.

The Netware box is fairly current (latest service pack), or so I've been
told.

We'll try the test restore on a different machine...  As for the
space question, we restored less than 200MB, and had 12GB available
on the volume.

Thanks for your lightning-fast replies everyone.  =)

-JD.

From: Justin Derrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

I've got a system here running Novell Netware 5.1 SP6, with
TSA500.NLM at 5.0.5d, TSANDS.NLM at 10110.95, and SMDR at 6.50c,
using the web client at version 5.2.0.0 to manage a restore process
to an alternate directory.  Here's the catch:

About 75% (of 2000) of the files that we're attempting to restore
fail with an error that says that the file could not be written, with
no reason code.  The users still appear to exist, and the other 25%
of the files restore without an issue.

Can you restore the troublesome files to another NetWare server? Do
those files all belong to one (or more) directories?

I don't have a NetWare box in front of me, but are you at the very
latest version of the TSA5UP patches? If you're not, try an upgrade.

And (the obvious question) do you have enough space in the volume
you're writing to?

--

Mark Stapleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: TSM Journalling Engine - experiences and MEMORYEFFICENTBACKUP needed?

[Kamp, Bruce]

I went through this not to long ago.  My server is not quit as big as yours
about 1.7 million files.  My problem was that I was using
resourceutilization=3.  When I dropped it to 2 the backups started working
again.


---
Bruce Kamp
Midrange Systems Analyst II
Memorial Healthcare System
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597
Fax: (954) 985-1404
---


-Original Message-
From: David McClelland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 7:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hi Guys,

I've been tinkering with the TSM Journaling engine for a few weeks now, and
wonder if anyone has come across this before:

TSM Server - Win2K Advanced Server SP3 - 2xPIII 1GB RAM - TSM Server
5.1.6.2
TSM Client - Win 2K Advanced Server SP3 - 4xPIV 4GB RAM - TSM Client 5.1.5.0

My TSM client is a file server, on its first full incremental backup (with
journaling turned on) stowed away nearly 9 million files on the TSM server -
a perfect candidate for the TSM journaling engine I thought. However, the
tsmjbbd.exe process bombed just before the end with a 'DB Access Critical
Thread Return code 215' type error, although the backup continued.

Anyway, I net started the `TSM Journal Service` (I have preserveDB on exit
switched on and observed by journal files to be around 1.5GB) and kicked off
another incremental backup. The TSM server now begins sending its inventory
for this node to the TSM client dsmc.exe process. I started watching it grow
in Task Manager on the client in line with how much data was being sent from
the server.

Now, 9 million files, at an average of maybe 500K per TSM database entry
equals roughly 4.5GB. Was TSM trying to send the *whole* 4.5GB inventory for
this node to the dsmc.exe process on the client? Needless to say, at 2GB (I
believe the limit that Win2K places on a single process) the TSM client had
had enough and ended with an 'ANS1030E System ran out of memory. Process
ended'.

So, what shall I do - is MEMORYEFFICIENTBACKUP YES my only get out of jail
card here, and exactly what does this do differently? Is my understanding
above what is actually happening?

I'd be most grateful to hear of anyone else's positive or negative
experiences of using the Journaling Engine, as it seems just so *ideal* for
some of our file servers, yet my experiences so far suggest it might not be
as easy and robust as I would ideally like it to be (i.e.
cancelled backups forcing restart of journal, process bombing out midway
through backup etc.), especially as a full or normal incremental backup can
run into days to complete...

Many thanks,

David McClelland
Management Systems Integrator
Global Management Systems
Reuters
85 Fleet Street
London EC4P 4AJ

E-mail  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reuters Messaging   [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--- -
Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com

Get closer to the financial markets with Reuters Messaging - for more
information and to register, visit http://www.reuters.com/messaging

Any views expressed in this message are those of  the  individual sender,
except  where  the sender specifically states them to be the views of
Reuters Ltd.

Re: TSM Journalling Engine - experiences and MEMORYEFFICENTBACKUP needed?

[Kamp, Bruce]

I was using the 5.2.? Client..


---
Bruce Kamp
Midrange Systems Analyst II
Memorial Healthcare System
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597
Fax: (954) 985-1404
---


-Original Message-
From: Pete Tanenhaus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 9:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Importance: Low

 I went through this not to long ago.  My server is not quit as big
 as
yours
 about 1.7 million files.  My problem was that I was using
 resourceutilization=3.  When I dropped it to 2 the backups started
working
 again.

Currently multiple journal based backup sessions aren't supported, so a
client session which attempts to contact the journal service while another
jbb session is in progress will timeout.


APAR IC36261 has been opened against this problem and will be addressed in a
future release.

I circumvention to this problem was included in client version 5.16.2.

The following is problem/circumvention description in the 5.16.2 readme
file:


-
Problem Description:

An attempt to contact Journal Service by a client backup  times out because
another client JBB session is being processed by the journal service.

This may be due to multiple backup client processes (cmd line client, GUI,
Web Client, Scheduler client) running concurrently.

It may also be due to multiple client backup session threads being started
via the client ResourceUtilization option.

Currently the journal service is only capable of accepting one client
connection at a time.

If another client attempts to connect to the journal service while a Journal
Based Backup is in progress, the backup client will wait up to 50 seconds
for the connection to be established (that is, for the current Jbb session
to complete).

If the connection can't be obtained in 50 seconds the client times out.

Development is aware of this limitation and is working on implementing
multi-session Journal Based Backup in a future release.

This release does provide a circumvention to this problem to allow a client
to wait for a specified or indefinite amount of time for Journal Service
connection to be established (see problem circumvention section).


Problem Symptoms:

Journal Based Backup fails, backup reverts to normal incremental backup.

The following message is written to the client errorlog:

NpOpen: Named pipe error connecting to server WaitOnPipe failed.
NpOpen: call failed with return code:121 pipe name \\.\pipe\jnl


Problem Circumvention:

The new timeout default is 120 seconds.

The problem won't occur if Journal Based Backup's don't overlap, and if the
ResourceUtilization option is set to 1.

A testflag has been implemented to allow the backup client to wait a
specified or indefinite amount of time for a connection with the journal
service.

This has the effect of queuing pending Journal Based Backups.

Note that if an indefinite amount of time is specified (i.e wait forever)
that there is no feedback to the user (other than a message being written to
the client errorlog) that the client is waiting for the connection.

Syntax of testflag (as specified in dsm.opt):

Test JNLOUTBNPTIMEOUT:nnn

where nnn is the timeout value in seconds.

If the timeout value is 0 (Test JNLOUTBNPTIMEOUT:0) the client will wait
indefinitely for a connection with the journal service.

--



Pete Tanenhaus
Tivoli Storage Solutions Software Development
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tieline: 320.8778, external: 607.754.4213

Those who refuse to challenge authority are condemned to conform to it

-- Forwarded by Pete Tanenhaus/San Jose/IBM on
09/24/2003 09:17 AM --- Please respond to ADSM:
Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by:ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: TSM Journalling Engine - experiences and
MEMORYEFFICENTBACKUP needed?



I went through this not to long ago.  My server is not quit as big as yours
about 1.7 million files.  My problem was that I was using
resourceutilization=3.  When I dropped it to 2 the backups started working
again.


---
Bruce Kamp
Midrange Systems Analyst II
Memorial Healthcare System
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597
Fax: (954) 985-1404
---


-Original Message-
From: David McClelland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 7:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hi Guys,

I've been tinkering with the TSM Journaling engine for a few weeks now, and
wonder if anyone has come across this before:

TSM Server - Win2K Advanced Server SP3 - 2xPIII 1GB RAM - TSM Server
5.1.6.2
TSM Client - Win 2K Advanced Server SP3 - 4xPIV 4GB RAM - TSM Client 5.1.5.0

Re: Very long Netware restore

[Kamp, Bruce]

This was about 2 years ago.  If I remember correctly is was on 1 switch that
the setting was wrong  Since then just about everything has changed.  I
now have an M80 running gigabit  our networking infrastructure has been
completely changed.


--
Bruce Kamp
Midrange Systems Analyst II
Memorial Healthcare System
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
P: (954) 987-2020 x4597
F: (954) 985-1404
---


-Original Message-
From: Andy Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 11:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

So that we don't have to have our network people run sniffer traces,
could you tell us what you set the MTU to?  Is it something smaller than
the normal 1500?  Was this on the client side or the TSM server side?
Thanks.


Andy Carlson|\  _,,,---,,_
Senior Technical Specialist   ZZZzz /,`.-'`'-.  ;-;;,_
BJC Health Care|,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'
St. Louis, Missouri   '---''(_/--'  `-'\_)
Cat Pics: http://andyc.dyndns.org/animal.html


On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Kamp, Bruce wrote:

 Had this problem before!  It was an MTU size problem.  Once that was fixed
 the restore flew!


 --
 Bruce Kamp
 Midrange Systems Analyst II
 Memorial Healthcare System
 E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 P: (954) 987-2020 x4597
 F: (954) 985-1404
 ---


 -Original Message-
 From: Richard Rhodes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 2:07 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 We recently did a full restore of a Netware server.  Basically, we're
 interested if the restore time sounds reasonable - it doesn't to us.

 The server that was restored is actually at a remote site from the
 TSM server location, but the restore was done at the TSM site, then,
 driven to the remote site for installation.

 The restore specs read like this:

   Compression:  Files compressed using TSM client compression
   Size: 240gb
   Files: 938,617
   Restore Time:  50 hours
   Throughput:  around 1.3mb/s average speed (240gb/50hr)
   Network:  100MB/fdx, local to TSM server
 (admins checked for duplex mismatch)
   Tape Drives:  IBM 3590
   Netware Server
 Version:  NW5.1 SP3
 Dell 2650
1 - 2ghz xeon processor
2gb memory
513mb cache on processor

 This just doesn't sound right.  After this was all done, we created a
 backupset to see
 just how fast TSM could access the servers files.

   Backupset Creation Time:  11 hours
   From Tape Drive:  IBM 3590
   To Tape Drive:  IBM 3590

 So . . . . the bottleneck doesn't appear to be the TSM server.

 Any thoughts as to why our restore took 50 hours???  The obvious answer is
 that the files had to be uncompressed on the client, but I would have
 thought
 a 2ghz processor would be able to uncompress much more than a 1.3mb/s data
 stream.

 Thanks

 Rick






 -
 The information contained in this message is intended only for the
personal
 and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of
this
 message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for
delivering
 it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have
received
 this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution,
or
 copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
 communication in error, please notify us immediately, and delete the
 original message.

Re: Very long Netware restore

[Kamp, Bruce]

Had this problem before!  It was an MTU size problem.  Once that was fixed
the restore flew!


--
Bruce Kamp
Midrange Systems Analyst II
Memorial Healthcare System
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
P: (954) 987-2020 x4597
F: (954) 985-1404
---


-Original Message-
From: Richard Rhodes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 2:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

We recently did a full restore of a Netware server.  Basically, we're
interested if the restore time sounds reasonable - it doesn't to us.

The server that was restored is actually at a remote site from the
TSM server location, but the restore was done at the TSM site, then,
driven to the remote site for installation.

The restore specs read like this:

  Compression:  Files compressed using TSM client compression
  Size: 240gb
  Files: 938,617
  Restore Time:  50 hours
  Throughput:  around 1.3mb/s average speed (240gb/50hr)
  Network:  100MB/fdx, local to TSM server
(admins checked for duplex mismatch)
  Tape Drives:  IBM 3590
  Netware Server
Version:  NW5.1 SP3
Dell 2650
   1 - 2ghz xeon processor
   2gb memory
   513mb cache on processor

This just doesn't sound right.  After this was all done, we created a
backupset to see
just how fast TSM could access the servers files.

  Backupset Creation Time:  11 hours
  From Tape Drive:  IBM 3590
  To Tape Drive:  IBM 3590

So . . . . the bottleneck doesn't appear to be the TSM server.

Any thoughts as to why our restore took 50 hours???  The obvious answer is
that the files had to be uncompressed on the client, but I would have
thought
a 2ghz processor would be able to uncompress much more than a 1.3mb/s data
stream.

Thanks

Rick






-
The information contained in this message is intended only for the personal
and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this
message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering
it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received
this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or
copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately, and delete the
original message.

Re: Very long Netware restore

[Kamp, Bruce]

I don't the exactly what MTU means  Basicly it is the packet size.  We
found this out after my network guys ran Sniffer on our network.  The
difference in restore tmes was 2-3 days to about 10-12 hours!  Your network
people should be able to give a better definition!  I colocated my tapepool
after my first big reatore.


---
Bruce Kamp
Midrange Systems Analyst II
Memorial Healthcare System
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597
Fax: (954) 985-1404
---


-Original Message-
From: William Rosette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 3:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hey Bruce,

  I had a similar problem with 500 GB of info on 2 clients of
Novell/Netware, 1 200 GB and the other 300 GB.  It also took days.  I was
told to collocate and restore the dirs only first.  What does MTU stand for?
Is it a TSM client setting?, server setting? or Novell/Netware setting?

Thank You,
Bill Rosette
Data Center/IS/Papa Johns International
WWJD



  Kamp, Bruce
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent by: ADSM:  cc:
  Dist StorSubject:  Re: Very long
Netware restore
  Manager
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  .EDU


  09/23/2003 03:19
  PM
  Please respond to
  ADSM: Dist Stor
  Manager






Had this problem before!  It was an MTU size problem.  Once that was fixed
the restore flew!


--
Bruce Kamp
Midrange Systems Analyst II
Memorial Healthcare System
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
P: (954) 987-2020 x4597
F: (954) 985-1404
---


-Original Message-
From: Richard Rhodes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 2:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

We recently did a full restore of a Netware server.  Basically, we're
interested if the restore time sounds reasonable - it doesn't to us.

The server that was restored is actually at a remote site from the TSM
server location, but the restore was done at the TSM site, then, driven to
the remote site for installation.

The restore specs read like this:

  Compression:  Files compressed using TSM client compression
  Size: 240gb
  Files: 938,617
  Restore Time:  50 hours
  Throughput:  around 1.3mb/s average speed (240gb/50hr)
  Network:  100MB/fdx, local to TSM server
(admins checked for duplex mismatch)
  Tape Drives:  IBM 3590
  Netware Server
Version:  NW5.1 SP3
Dell 2650
   1 - 2ghz xeon processor
   2gb memory
   513mb cache on processor

This just doesn't sound right.  After this was all done, we created a
backupset to see just how fast TSM could access the servers files.

  Backupset Creation Time:  11 hours
  From Tape Drive:  IBM 3590
  To Tape Drive:  IBM 3590

So . . . . the bottleneck doesn't appear to be the TSM server.

Any thoughts as to why our restore took 50 hours???  The obvious answer is
that the files had to be uncompressed on the client, but I would have
thought a 2ghz processor would be able to uncompress much more than a
1.3mb/s data stream.

Thanks

Rick






-
The information contained in this message is intended only for the personal
and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this
message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering
it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received
this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or
copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately, and delete the
original message.

Re: Problem loading dmsc.nlm

[Kamp, Bruce]

Check that the netlib.nlm is loaded.  In Netware 6 (I think) SP2 stops
loading this nlm.  Later versions of the TSM client will load it for you.


---
Bruce Kamp
Midrange Systems Analyst II
Memorial Healthcare System
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597
Fax: (954) 985-1404
---


-Original Message-
From: Matt Zufelt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 11:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I believe the problem was fixed in later versions of the TSM for NetWare
client.  Until you are able to upgrade, you can work around it by loading
netdb.nlm before loading dsmc.

Matt


 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 9/23/2003 9:21:47 AM 
Is anyone familiar with the following problem:

SERVER-5.60-918:Loader cannot find public symbol:
NetDBgethostbyname for module DSMC.NLM
  Error processing External Records.
  Module DSMC.NLM not loaded

Problem consist on a Netware 6 server.  TSM Novell Client 5.1.5

Thx
Peter

Error with 5.2.0 Client on W2K

[Kamp, Bruce]

Envirnoment:
Client:  WIn2k Server SP3 with 5.2.0.1 TSM client
Server:  5.1.1.6 on AIX 4.3.3

Recieving the following error in the dsmerror.log:
09/13/2003 13:15:25 ANS1977E Dsmcad schedule invocation was unsuccessful -
will try again
09/13/2003 13:25:25 Error starting schedule service:
CheckStartDIAgentService: Win32 RC=1053.

Has anybody seen this?  If so what is the fix?

Thanks,
Bruce Kamp

Novell Client 5.2.0 on Netware 6

[Kamp, Bruce]

Just installed the 5.2.0.0 client on a Netware 6 server (I think SP2).  When
I try to do a restore I get the following error in the DSMERROR.log  the
restore is VERY slow!  My network did not see any errors on the switches
that the Netware server  TSM server are connected to.

09/09/2003 06:52:05 ANS1005E TCP/IP read error on socket = 20, errno = 54,
reason : 'Connection reset by peer'.
09/09/2003 06:52:05 Error reading http request.
09/09/2003 06:52:06 Error opening input file
MRH1\SYS:/TIVOLI/TSM/CLIENT/BA/uil.jar
09/09/2003 06:52:06 Error opening input file
MRH1\SYS:/TIVOLI/TSM/CLIENT/BA/uil.jar
09/09/2003 06:52:06 Error opening input file
MRH1\SYS:/TIVOLI/TSM/CLIENT/BA/com/ibm/ps/uil/nls/UilCommonIconBundle_en.cla
ss
09/09/2003 06:52:06 Error opening input file
MRH1\SYS:/TIVOLI/TSM/CLIENT/BA/com/ibm/ps/uil/nls/UilCommonIconBundle_en.cla
ss
09/09/2003 06:52:06 Error opening input file
MRH1\SYS:/TIVOLI/TSM/CLIENT/BA/uil.jar
09/09/2003 06:52:06 Error opening input file
MRH1\SYS:/TIVOLI/TSM/CLIENT/BA/uil.jar
09/09/2003 06:52:06 Error opening input file
MRH1\SYS:/TIVOLI/TSM/CLIENT/BA/com/ibm/ps/uil/nls/UilCommonIconBundle_en.pro
perties
09/09/2003 06:52:06 Error opening input file
MRH1\SYS:/TIVOLI/TSM/CLIENT/BA/uil.jar
09/09/2003 06:52:06 Error opening input file
MRH1\SYS:/TIVOLI/TSM/CLIENT/BA/uil.jar
09/09/2003 06:52:06 Error opening input file
MRH1\SYS:/TIVOLI/TSM/CLIENT/BA/com/ibm/ps/uil/nls/UilCommonIconBundle_en_US.
class
09/09/2003 06:52:06 Error opening input file
MRH1\SYS:/TIVOLI/TSM/CLIENT/BA/com/ibm/ps/uil/nls/UilCommonIconBundle_en_US.
class
09/09/2003 06:52:06 Error opening input file
MRH1\SYS:/TIVOLI/TSM/CLIENT/BA/uil.jar
09/09/2003 06:52:06 Error opening input file
MRH1\SYS:/TIVOLI/TSM/CLIENT/BA/uil.jar
09/09/2003 06:52:06 Error opening input file
MRH1\SYS:/TIVOLI/TSM/CLIENT/BA/com/ibm/ps/uil/nls/UilCommonIconBundle_en_US.
properties
09/09/2003 07:05:26 ANS1005E TCP/IP read error on socket = 20, errno = 54,
reason : 'Connection reset by peer'.
09/09/2003 07:05:27 ANS1809W Session is lost; initializing session reopen
procedure.
09/09/2003 07:05:42 ANS1811S TSM session could not be reestablished.

Has anybody ever seen this before or have any ideas what the problem is?  My
TSM server is 5.1.1.6 on AIX 4.3.3.

Thanks,
---
Bruce Kamp
Midrange Systems Analyst II
Memorial Healthcare System
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597
Fax: (954) 985-1404
---

Re: reorg offsite data - noncollocated to collocated

[Kamp, Bruce]

I am going through this also.  The only way I could figure out was to let
expiration take care of it


--
Bruce Kamp
Midrange Systems Analyst II
Memorial Healthcare System
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
P: (954) 987-2020 x4597
F: (954) 985-1404
---


-Original Message-
From: i love tsm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 10:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hi all

Hoping someone can help with this opportunity we have...

For a number of our existing clients we have changed them from using
non-collocated to collocated storage. Obviously the next step is to use the
move nodedata command to move the old primary data across into the new
primary collocated storage pool. This data will then get backed up to the
new collocated copy storage pool we've set up.

The problem is how do I delete the data for the nodes that will still reside
in the old non-collocated copy storage pool.?   I don't want to use delete
volume because the data is spread over lots , i.e 70+, tapes, and these
tapes contain data for nodes we want to leave noncollocated.

Wish there was move nodedata command for copystgpools !

Any thoughts or ideas appreciated.

TIA

_
Find a cheaper internet access deal - choose one to suit you.
http://www.msn.co.uk/internetaccess

Re: TSM Client 5.2.0.0 on W2k

[Kamp, Bruce]

Have you tried using the resource kit utility called PSKILL?  I use it all
the time on servers when the scheduler is stuck in a starting state
All you need is the process number.
Not a solution to the real problem but it save you a reboot!


--
Bruce Kamp
Midrange Systems Analyst II
Memorial Healthcare System
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
P: (954) 987-2020 x4597
F: (954) 985-1404
---


-Original Message-
From: Janusz Wiszniowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 11:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hi all !


I have problem with TSM 5.2.0.0 Client on Win2000 Server. An Open File
Support module is installed. The SNAPSHOTCACHELOCATION is set correctly.
When performing incremental backup of filesystem,the operation sometimes
hangs. Once it hangs on C:\WINNT\Temp\somefile, other time on some Outlook
files, etc. This job is starting from scheduler as command file script .
When it hangs, then I have to reboot (hard) machine because there is no way
to kill the tsm session or kill the DOS window.

Some one Can Help Me ?

Regards


Janusz

Re: *Real* admin interface (Was: q vol f=g ??!?)

[Kamp, Bruce]

What might be another alternative is an MMC (Microsoft Management
Console)

Bruce Kamp

-Original Message-
From: Richard Sims
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 8/22/2003 9:55 AM
Subject: Re: *Real* admin interface (Was: q vol f=g ??!?)

this the old admin GUI is much better than the Web interface
subject=20
pops up now and then.
The poster of the first message always dreams of a Windows or Java GUI
that supports the latest TSM server (btw I'm dreaming too).
A few minutes later the list gets drowned by me too messages.

I think there was/is a SHARE requirement for a *real* admin interface
(can you filter your tape volumes with the web interface?).
I don't understand why Tivoli isn't listening to their customers.
Tivoli should start a survey on how many customers would like to have
such an animal and on what platform. Based on this results it should be
easy to provide a GUI for the platform users want.

So please Tivoli, LISTEN!

Thomas - I share your frustration.  How to get results may require
another
 approach...
Product such as TSM are Big Bucks, Enterprise products.  As such, they
are
marketed to the level of people in the organization who can authorize
such
expenditures - customer company executives.  Executives respond to
Enterprise
issues: competitiveness, saving lots of money, nice reports, trimming
staff.
Issues that affect us lowly technicians way down in the company engine
room,
where we shovel coal into the company boilers, don't get any exposure or
attention.  To get such attention, those issues have to get up to a
higher
management level where those managers, whom IBM will respond to, will
feed
the issues to the IBM rep and thus get attention.  You have to expend
efforts
to make a written case, understandable to higher-ups, that the current
product situation is impairing administration and costing the company
lost
productivity, etc.

SHARE is certainly an avenue; but as they say, Money talks.

  Richard Sims, BU

Re: DRM Restore Assist?

[Kamp, Bruce]

Why do you have stay on server version 4.2 because of Novell?  I backed up
my 4.11 Novell servers to a 5.1 server with no problems.
I know when I had my DR test last year with 4.1 on AIX I had to change my
devconfig to a manual library to restore the DB...


--
Bruce Kamp
Midrange Systems Analyst II
Memorial Healthcare System
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
P: (954) 987-2020 x4597
F: (954) 985-1404
---


-Original Message-
From: David Longo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 9:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Well, you left out a few details.  Like do you have automated or manual
tape library?  Did you do ANY editing of the files after they were
exploded?  (You have to do some).  When you started the script,
what mesages did you get?  There should be some indication
of what's happening.

And oh yes, have you ever done a DR situation before?

Just one quick answer, if automated library, after you explode the
DRM files, then edit DEVICE.CONFIGURATION.FILE to put actual
location and volser of your DB backup tape.  That's so the DR script
(and the server) can find it.

And did you prepare the DB Vols at the OS level before you tried DR?

There's a lot more to this, this is a couple of quick answers based on
limited info you provided.


David B. Longo
System Administrator
Health First, Inc.
3300 Fiske Blvd.
Rockledge, FL 32955-4305
PH  321.434.5536
Pager  321.634.8230
Fax:321.434.5509
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/04/03 09:04PM 
I am using DRM to restore a 4.2.3.1 NT server, from DRM (yep, can't upgrade
until we get rid
of our Novell 4.11 servers, ... that should be done by this time next year
;)

Anyway, when doing the drm restore, the command in the script that was
exploded from the DRM plan file is

recovery.script.disaster.recovery.mode.cmd

that says

   dsmserv -k server1 restore db todate=... totime=...  source=dbb

runs but never completes and never seems to write to the database volumes
from the DB tape
that is already in tape drive 0.

Any suggestions on debugging?

TIA ... Jack

##
This message is for the named person's use only.  It may
contain confidential, proprietary, or legally privileged
information.  No confidentiality or privilege is waived or
lost by any mistransmission.  If you receive this message
in error, please immediately delete it and all copies of it
from your system, destroy any hard copies of it, and notify
the sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use,
disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message
if you are not the intended recipient.  Health First reserves
the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its
networks.  Any views or opinions expressed in this message
are solely those of the individual sender, except (1) where
the message states such views or opinions are on behalf of
a particular entity;  and (2) the sender is authorized by
the entity to give such views or opinions.
##

Re: Empty offsite tape reclamed again and again

[Kamp, Bruce]

Had forgotten about this little bug.
   VOLUME_NAME: D00596
   STGPOOL_NAME: C1_FS_DRMP
  DEVCLASS_NAME: 3590DEVCLASS
EST_CAPACITY_MB: 0.0
   PCT_UTILIZED: 0.0
 STATUS: EMPTY
 ACCESS: OFFSITE
PCT_RECLAIM: 0.0
SCRATCH: Yes
ERROR_STATE: No
  NUM_SIDES: 1
  TIMES_MOUNTED: 2
 WRITE_PASS: 1
LAST_WRITE_DATE: 2003-07-30 07:31:13.00
 LAST_READ_DATE: 2003-07-30 03:37:46.00
   PENDING_DATE:
   WRITE_ERRORS: 0
READ_ERRORS: 0
   LOCATION: Arcus
   CHG_TIME: 2003-08-05 14:32:50.00
  CHG_ADMIN: ADMIN

When I update the volume to access=readw it is deleted from DRMPOOL.
After that it will not allow me to run the audit on the volume.
I am running DRM
Should I just bring them back onsite  check them in?


--
Bruce Kamp
Midrange Systems Analyst II
Memorial Healthcare System
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
P: (954) 987-2020 x4597
F: (954) 985-1404
---


-Original Message-
From: Prather, Wanda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 12:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

This is a bug that many people experience.
We see it on occasion, as well.
(I thought it would be fixed by 5.1.6.2, though.)

-Original Message-
From: PAC Brion Arnaud [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 10:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Empty offsite tape reclamed again and again


Hi Phillip,

Thanks for your procedure, I tried it, and while issuing audit vol ..
got this message :

08/06/03 15:49:39 ANR2334W Missing or incorrect information detected
by
   AUDIT VOLUME for volume 08 - information will
be
   created or corrected.

Now, q vol f=d returns :

  Volume Name: 08
 Storage Pool Name: COPYLTO1_AIX
 Device Class Name: LTO1
   Estimated Capacity (MB): 0.0
  Pct Util: 0.0
 Volume Status: Empty
Access: Offsite
Pct. Reclaimable Space: 0.0
   Scratch Volume?: Yes
   In Error State?: No
  Number of Writable Sides: 1
   Number of Times Mounted: 8
 Write Pass Number: 1
 Approx. Date Last Written: 09/24/02 08:59:57
Approx. Date Last Read: 09/21/02 17:24:57
   Date Became Pending:
Number of Write Errors: 0
 Number of Read Errors: 0
   Volume Location: VAULT
Last Update by (administrator): BAR021
 Last Update Date/Time: 08/06/03 15:52:49

And q drm returns :

08  Vault retrieve   09/24/02 10:11:07

So I think everything is fine again !
Thanks a lot for your help ... By the way, did you face the same problem
that you could gave me such a rapid response, and case of a positive
answer, do you know what happened that resulted in such a behaviour ?
Cheers.

Arnaud

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
| Arnaud Brion, Panalpina Management Ltd., IT Group |
| Viaduktstrasse 42, P.O. Box, 4002 Basel - Switzerland |
| Phone: +41 61 226 19 78 / Fax: +41 61 226 17 01   |
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=



-Original Message-
From: Ford, Phillip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 06 August, 2003 15:06
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Empty offsite tape reclamed again and again


If there is no contents on the volume and it will not go back to scratch
then do the following:

Update vol 08 access=readw
Audit vol  08 fix=yes
Update vol 08 access=offsite

Now the volume should show as empty (or pending) and not filling.  If
you are running DRM it will take care of the rest.  If not then you will
have to recall tape and update its status.

Hope that helps


--
Phillip Ford
Senior Software Specialist
Corporate Computer Center
Schering-Plough Corp.
(901) 320-4462
(901) 320-4856 FAX
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





-Original Message-
From: PAC Brion Arnaud [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 7:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Empty offsite tape reclamed again and again


Hi list !

TSM server 5.1.6.2 on AIX 4.3.3
Could someone explain following behaviour : TSM server insists reclaming
an offsite empty tape several times a day, sometimes restarting a new
reclamation process seconds after the first one ceased.

Q act begint=-12 s=08 shows (snippet of it)

06.08.2003 08:57:17  ANR1040I Space reclamation started for volume
08,

  storage pool COPYLTO1_AIX (process number 1401).

06.08.2003 08:57:17  ANR1041I Space reclamation ended for volume 08.

06.08.2003 08:57:56  ANR1040I Space reclamation started for volume
08,

  storage pool COPYLTO1_AIX (process number 1402).

06.08.2003 08:58:00  ANR1041I Space reclamation ended for volume 08.

06.08.2003 09:07:51  ANR1040I Space reclamation started for volume
08,

  storage pool 

Re: DRM Restore Assist?

[Kamp, Bruce]

I never read anywhere that the server version makes a difference.  The
client version definitely makes a difference!


--
Bruce Kamp
Midrange Systems Analyst II
Memorial Healthcare System
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
P: (954) 987-2020 x4597
F: (954) 985-1404
---


-Original Message-
From: Coats, Jack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 10:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bruce et al,

We verified (not long ago) that we were at the highest versions of what
were supported configurations.  Here it is a political thing about going
to known unsupported configurations.  I wish I had an AIX system to use
as a TSM server, but in this world (company) you do as the locals do.

I will check my devconfig.  I removed all but the devices/library that
is in my DR system (when I edited the plan file before exploding it).

Thanks for the input. .. Jack

-Original Message-
From: Kamp, Bruce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 7:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: DRM Restore Assist?


Why do you have stay on server version 4.2 because of Novell?  I backed up
my 4.11 Novell servers to a 5.1 server with no problems.
I know when I had my DR test last year with 4.1 on AIX I had to change my
devconfig to a manual library to restore the DB...


--

Re: Collocation from nocollocation

[Kamp, Bruce]

I did that about 2 years ago.  Not quit as big as you at the time...
I did not move everybody at once.  Moved AIX nodes then my Novell then my
NT/2000 then Oracle  MS SQL nodes because that is the way I broke out my
storage pools.
Depending on what version of TSM you are on should be easier (if you are
high enough to have move nodedata command).
It was no fun because the tapes that had more then 1 node on it I had to
move it to a temporary disk pool then the final tape pool.
One thing you will gain is all your new tapes will be nice  compacted!
Hope this helps!


--
Bruce Kamp
Midrange Systems Analyst II
Memorial Healthcare System
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
P: (954) 987-2020 x4597
F: (954) 985-1404
---


-Original Message-
From: William Rosette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 11:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hi TSM'ers

  Has anybody out there gone from 3 years of nocollocation and then
changed to collocation for better restores.  We are currently at 2-3+ TB of
info on 540 tapes (this is all in our 1 TAPEPOOL).  We have about 410
scratch tapes and the uppers are worried about making the global switch to
collocate will cause TSM to crash due to no scratch tapes.  Also if there
are any other gotcha's I would be greatly appreciated.  Maybe even send
you, some of our greatest pizza haha.

Thank You,
Bill Rosette
Data Center/IS/Papa Johns International
WWJD

Re: Collocation from nocollocation

[Kamp, Bruce]

Yes I created new tape pools.  It took me about 6 months?  I let some happen
on its on through reclamation  expiration.  When I had some time I would
move data manually.  Yes I lost some tapes because of small nodes but I
think it is definitely worth it.  Especially during restores.
When did this I think I started with about half the number of scratch tapes
as I had in my tape pool.  Then as time went on I added tapes as needed.
I never documented how tapes I started with  ended with


--
Bruce Kamp
Midrange Systems Analyst II
Memorial Healthcare System
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
P: (954) 987-2020 x4597
F: (954) 985-1404
---


-Original Message-
From: William Rosette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 11:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

How was your scratch tapes.  Did you loose tapes to inefficiency?  since
collocation will not be tape effecient.  Also, did you create a new tape
pool (collocated) as you were migrating your backups?  How bout timewise,
what kind of time line am I looking at?

Thank You,
Bill Rosette
Data Center/IS/Papa Johns International
WWJD



  Kamp, Bruce
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent by: ADSM:  cc:
  Dist StorSubject:  Re: Collocation
from nocollocation
  Manager
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  .EDU


  07/29/2003 11:38
  AM
  Please respond to
  ADSM: Dist Stor
  Manager






I did that about 2 years ago.  Not quit as big as you at the time...
I did not move everybody at once.  Moved AIX nodes then my Novell then my
NT/2000 then Oracle  MS SQL nodes because that is the way I broke out my
storage pools.
Depending on what version of TSM you are on should be easier (if you are
high enough to have move nodedata command).
It was no fun because the tapes that had more then 1 node on it I had to
move it to a temporary disk pool then the final tape pool.
One thing you will gain is all your new tapes will be nice  compacted!
Hope this helps!


--
Bruce Kamp
Midrange Systems Analyst II
Memorial Healthcare System
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
P: (954) 987-2020 x4597
F: (954) 985-1404
---


-Original Message-
From: William Rosette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 11:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hi TSM'ers

  Has anybody out there gone from 3 years of nocollocation and then
changed to collocation for better restores.  We are currently at 2-3+ TB of
info on 540 tapes (this is all in our 1 TAPEPOOL).  We have about 410
scratch tapes and the uppers are worried about making the global switch to
collocate will cause TSM to crash due to no scratch tapes.  Also if there
are any other gotcha's I would be greatly appreciated.  Maybe even send
you, some of our greatest pizza haha.

Thank You,
Bill Rosette
Data Center/IS/Papa Johns International
 WWJD

Re: Problem with the W2k 5.2.0.1 Client?

[Kamp, Bruce]

Andy,
Did some more testing today with this server.  I removed the journaling
engine.  Backup is running but one thing I noticed was that the backup takes
one of the processors  sends it utilization up to 100%  dsm.exe is using
400MB of memory!  Is this normal?  The file system I'm trying to backup has
over a million files on it, all very small.

Thanks,
--
Bruce Kamp
Midrange Systems Analyst II
Memorial Healthcare System
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
P: (954) 987-2020 x4597
F: (954) 985-1404
---


-Original Message-
From: Andrew Raibeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 10:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Yes, SP4 is only recently available so we do not know what, if any,
incompatibilities may exist between TSM and SP4. However, for those who
choose to install SP4, we will support it to as great an extent as possible,
i.e. if you report a problem and it turns out to be a bug in TSM, we will
take an APAR for it.

I don't know what the RC 1450 problem is off-hand, but a quick review of
similar reported problems suggest looking at the following MS KB articles:

142719 - Windows Reports Out Of Resources Error When Memory Is Available

192409 - Open Files Can Cause Kernel to Report INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES

236964 - Delayed Return of Paged Pool Causes Error 1450 Insufficient
Resources

247904 - How To Configure the Paged Address Pool and System Page Table Entry
Memory Areas

304101 - Backup Fails with Event ID 1450

You might check these out, though I can not say for sure whether they will
help. However, Q142719 was helpful in resolving in at least one case.

Regards,

Andy

Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew
Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The command line is your friend.
Good enough is the enemy of excellence.




Kamp, Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
07/22/2003 07:22
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager


To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: Problem with the W2k 5.2.0.1 Client?



SP4 is not an option until the vendor certifies it...
Also it is a quad Xeon system with hyper threading (looks like 8 to the
OS)
 8Gig of memory pagefile size 2046-4092.
The average CPU utilization is 10%  memory 25%


--
Bruce Kamp
Midrange Systems Analyst II
Memorial Healthcare System
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
P: (954) 987-2020 x4597
F: (954) 985-1404
---


-Original Message-
From: Richard Sims [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 10:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Just one of my Windows 2000 SP3 servers to the 5.2.0.1 client.  My
server is
5.1.1.6 on AIX 4.3.3.
...
07/22/2003 08:39:31 ANSE ntrc.cpp(890): Received Win32 RC 1450 from
FileRead(): ReadFile
...
I was also receiving errors on my old version 5.1.6.0 on this server.
Is the problem with the client or the journal engine?  Also anybody
have any ideas on how to fix this?

Refer to your Windows Return Codes reference when encountering such
problems:

 1450   Insufficient system resources exist
ERROR_NO_SYSTEM_RESOURCES
to complete the requested service.

Is this an undersized PC, perhaps - too little real memory or paging space?
This would explain it occurring regardless of client level, as it is endemic
to the PC configuration.  (Have your Windows admins get that machine to
SP4
when opportune, for safety.)

  Richard Sims, BU

Re: Problem with the W2k 5.2.0.1 Client?

[Kamp, Bruce]

SP4 is not an option until the vendor certifies it...
Also it is a quad Xeon system with hyper threading (looks like 8 to the OS)
 8Gig of memory pagefile size 2046-4092.
The average CPU utilization is 10%  memory 25%


--
Bruce Kamp
Midrange Systems Analyst II
Memorial Healthcare System
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
P: (954) 987-2020 x4597
F: (954) 985-1404
---


-Original Message-
From: Richard Sims [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 10:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Just one of my Windows 2000 SP3 servers to the 5.2.0.1 client.  My
server is
5.1.1.6 on AIX 4.3.3.
...
07/22/2003 08:39:31 ANSE ntrc.cpp(890): Received Win32 RC 1450 from
FileRead(): ReadFile
...
I was also receiving errors on my old version 5.1.6.0 on this server.
Is the problem with the client or the journal engine?  Also anybody
have any ideas on how to fix this?

Refer to your Windows Return Codes reference when encountering such
problems:

 1450   Insufficient system resources exist
ERROR_NO_SYSTEM_RESOURCES
to complete the requested service.

Is this an undersized PC, perhaps - too little real memory or paging space?
This would explain it occurring regardless of client level, as it is endemic
to the PC configuration.  (Have your Windows admins get that machine to SP4
when opportune, for safety.)

  Richard Sims, BU

AIX Upgrade from 4.3.3 to 5.1

[Kamp, Bruce]

I'm going to be upgrading my TSM server from 4.3.3 ML10 to 5.1 ML?.  My TSM
version is 5.1.1.6.  Has anybody had any problems with ML4?

Thanks,
--
Bruce Kamp
Midrange Systems Analyst II
Memorial Healthcare System
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P: (954) 987-2020 x4597
F: (954) 985-1404
---

Win2k Backup Failure?

[Kamp, Bruce]

I have a Windows 2000 ADV server with SP3  the 5.1.6.0 client on it that
has been show a backup failure.  I am also using the Journal Engine on this
server.  This is the message I get in the dsmerror.log:
06/27/2003 01:51:25 ANS1028S Internal program error.  Please see your
service representative.
06/27/2003 01:51:25 ANS1512E Scheduled event 'WIN_SYS_1' failed.  Return
code = 12.

When I look in the dsmsched.log this is what I see:
06/27/2003 01:49:07 Normal File--   863,101,440 \\api-sql\f$\Database
\\api-sql\f$\Database
bu\api_ts_sbhf121_live\api_ts_sbhf121_live_db_200306262300.BAK  **
Unsuccessful **
06/27/2003 01:51:25 --- SCHEDULEREC STATUS BEGIN
06/27/2003 01:51:25 Total number of objects inspected:  221,472
06/27/2003 01:51:25 Total number of objects backed up:1,931
06/27/2003 01:51:25 Total number of objects updated:  0
06/27/2003 01:51:25 Total number of objects rebound:  0
06/27/2003 01:51:25 Total number of objects deleted:  0
06/27/2003 01:51:25 Total number of objects expired: 11
06/27/2003 01:51:25 Total number of objects failed:   0
06/27/2003 01:51:25 Total number of bytes transferred: 7.63 GB
06/27/2003 01:51:25 Data transfer time:  609.40 sec
06/27/2003 01:51:25 Network data transfer rate:13,139.24 KB/sec
06/27/2003 01:51:25 Aggregate data transfer rate:  3,563.73 KB/sec
06/27/2003 01:51:25 Objects compressed by:  100%
06/27/2003 01:51:25 Elapsed processing time:   00:37:26
06/27/2003 01:51:25 --- SCHEDULEREC STATUS END
06/27/2003 01:51:25 ANS1028S Internal program error.  Please see your
service representative.
06/27/2003 01:51:25 --- SCHEDULEREC OBJECT END WIN_SYS_1 06/27/2003 01:00:00
06/27/2003 01:51:25 ANS1512E Scheduled event 'WIN_SYS_1' failed.  Return
code = 12.
06/27/2003 01:51:25 Sending results for scheduled event 'WIN_SYS_1'.
06/27/2003 01:51:25 Results sent to server for scheduled event 'WIN_SYS_1'.

Has anybody seen this?  If so what did you do to correct it?

Thanks,
--
Bruce Kamp
Midrange Systems Analyst II
Memorial Healthcare System
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P: (954) 987-2020 x4597
F: (954) 985-1404
---

Restoring DB onto a test server

[Kamp, Bruce]

Trying to restore my database on to a test server.
When I try to run  dsmserv format 2 /tsmlg1fs/tsmlg1vol /tsmlg2fs/tsmlg2vol
1 /tsmdb1fs/tsmdb1vol I get the following error:
ANRD lvminst.c(323): ThreadId0 Error creating Logical Partition Table
for
LOG volume /tsmlg2fs/tsmlg2vol.
Any thoughts on what is causing it?

Thanks,
--
Bruce Kamp
Midrange Systems Analyst II
Memorial Healthcare System
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P: (954) 987-2020 x4597
F: (954) 985-1404
---

Re: Restoring DB onto a test server

[Kamp, Bruce]

I guess that would help!!
Running TSM 5.1.1.6 on AIX 4.3.3 ML10
Ran dsmfmt -m -log /tsmlg2fs/tsmlg2vol 6000
Dsmfmt -m -log /tsmlg1fs/tsmlg1vol ?? (I don't remember exact size ran late
yesterday)
Dsmfmt -m -db  /tsmdb1fs/tsmdb1vol ?? (I don't remember exact size ran late
yesterday)
Dsmserv.opt, dsm.opt  sys, volhist  devconfig came over from mksysb

Went through  changed the server name where applicable.

My currnet production server has 2 log volumes.  Will I need both to recover
the server?

Thanks,
--
Bruce Kamp
Midrange Systems Analyst II
Memorial Healthcare System
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
P: (954) 987-2020 x4597
F: (954) 985-1404
---


-Original Message-
From: Andrew Raibeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 10:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

It would help to have more information about what you are doing, including
your exact server version, operating system on which it runs, and steps you
took leading up to the dsmserv format command. For example, what
*exact* commands did you use to preallocate the recover log and database and
recovery log files? Any other associated information would also be helpful.

Regards,

Andy

Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew
Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The command line is your friend.
Good enough is the enemy of excellence.




Kamp, Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
06/17/2003 07:18
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager


To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Restoring DB onto a test server



Trying to restore my database on to a test server.
When I try to run  dsmserv format 2 /tsmlg1fs/tsmlg1vol /tsmlg2fs/tsmlg2vol
1 /tsmdb1fs/tsmdb1vol I get the following error:
ANRD lvminst.c(323): ThreadId0 Error creating Logical Partition Table
for LOG volume /tsmlg2fs/tsmlg2vol.
Any thoughts on what is causing it?

Thanks,
--
Bruce Kamp
Midrange Systems Analyst II
Memorial Healthcare System
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P: (954) 987-2020 x4597
F: (954) 985-1404
---

Re: Restoring DB onto a test server

[Kamp, Bruce]

I think you hit it!  I had a brain fade.  Had created 15G of log space.  I
guess I should have used my DRM scripts to create!

Thanks,
--
Bruce Kamp
Midrange Systems Analyst II
Memorial Healthcare System
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
P: (954) 987-2020 x4597
F: (954) 985-1404
---


-Original Message-
From: Andrew Raibeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 11:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The number of volumes shouldn't make a difference. The main concern is that
the database is at least as large as the database you intend to restore. As
for the log volumes, just make sure that between the two volumes, the sizes
don't exceed the TSM maximum size of 13 GB. I suppose the punt option
would be to just perform the format with the one log volume; I would think
that would be large enough, although others with more practical experience
than I might have other opinions.

Regards,

Andy

Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew
Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The command line is your friend.
Good enough is the enemy of excellence.




Kamp, Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
06/17/2003 07:51
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager


To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: Restoring DB onto a test server



I guess that would help!!
Running TSM 5.1.1.6 on AIX 4.3.3 ML10
Ran dsmfmt -m -log /tsmlg2fs/tsmlg2vol 6000 Dsmfmt -m -log
/tsmlg1fs/tsmlg1vol ?? (I don't remember exact size ran late
yesterday)
Dsmfmt -m -db  /tsmdb1fs/tsmdb1vol ?? (I don't remember exact size ran late
yesterday)
Dsmserv.opt, dsm.opt  sys, volhist  devconfig came over from mksysb

Went through  changed the server name where applicable.

My currnet production server has 2 log volumes.  Will I need both to recover
the server?

Thanks,
--
Bruce Kamp
Midrange Systems Analyst II
Memorial Healthcare System
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
P: (954) 987-2020 x4597
F: (954) 985-1404
---


-Original Message-
From: Andrew Raibeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 10:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

It would help to have more information about what you are doing, including
your exact server version, operating system on which it runs, and steps you
took leading up to the dsmserv format command. For example, what
*exact* commands did you use to preallocate the recover log and database and
recovery log files? Any other associated information would also be helpful.

Regards,

Andy

Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew
Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The command line is your friend.
Good enough is the enemy of excellence.




Kamp, Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
06/17/2003 07:18
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager


To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Restoring DB onto a test server



Trying to restore my database on to a test server.
When I try to run  dsmserv format 2 /tsmlg1fs/tsmlg1vol /tsmlg2fs/tsmlg2vol
1 /tsmdb1fs/tsmdb1vol I get the following error:
ANRD lvminst.c(323): ThreadId0 Error creating Logical Partition Table
for LOG volume /tsmlg2fs/tsmlg2vol.
Any thoughts on what is causing it?

Thanks,
--
Bruce Kamp
Midrange Systems Analyst II
Memorial Healthcare System
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P: (954) 987-2020 x4597
F: (954) 985-1404
---

Re: IE 6.1 and command line

[Kamp, Bruce]

I ended up uninstalling SP1a.  Luckily I still have a copy of Sp1 
installed that
Works fine now.


--
Bruce Kamp
Midrange Systems Analyst II
Memorial Healthcare System
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
P: (954) 987-2020 x4597
F: (954) 985-1404
---


-Original Message-
From: Jurjen Oskam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 1:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 12:12:30PM -0500, Coats, Jack wrote:

 Due to 'company standardization', I upgraded my desktop from Win98 to
 XP, and IE 5.? to 6.1.  Now I start the TSM Web GUI pointed to our
 server (TSM Server Version 4.2.3.1), and show the command line.  When
 the command line shows all I see is a red X, like shows when there is
 a broken graphic a browser won't show.

The commandline is a Java-applet, and since Microsoft removed the Microsoft
Virtual Machine from Windows XP with service pack 1a, this is a problem.
:-) I have the Sun VM installed, but that doesn't work.

 The page is being displayed from URL:
 http://tsm:1580/ADMIN/ADMIN/b393ainvalid96bf1b2bec61/BITS1001010/cmdfr
 ame/cm
 dframe.frame

Do not post this URL. With this URL, no further authentication is needed to
access the TSM server. Depending on how long your timeout setting is, you're
giving away administrative access for a while.

--
Jurjen Oskam

PGP Key available at http://www.stupendous.org/

TSM Journal Engine Client Error

[Kamp, Bruce]

Environment:
Client Win2k Sp3  TSM client 5.1.6.0
TSM server 5.1.1.6 on AIX 4.3.3 ML10
Received these 2 errors:

Jbberror.log:
06/17/2003 04:00:01 psFsMonitorThread(tid 7148): Notification buffer overrun
for monitored FS 'F:\'.
06/17/2003 04:00:01 psFsMonitorThread(tid 7148): Reallocating 0x0039
byte notification buffer.
06/17/2003 04:00:01 psFsMonitorThread(tid 7148): Journal DB will be
restarted for FS 'F:\'.
06/17/2003 04:00:07 psFsMonitorThread(tid 7148): Notification buffer overrun
for monitored FS 'F:\'.
06/17/2003 04:00:07 psFsMonitorThread(tid 7148): Reallocating 0x00451eb7
byte notification buffer.
06/17/2003 04:00:07 psFsMonitorThread(tid 7148): Journal DB will be
restarted for FS 'F:\'.
06/17/2003 04:00:11 psFsMonitorThread(tid 7148): Notification buffer overrun
for monitored FS 'F:\'.
06/17/2003 04:00:11 psFsMonitorThread(tid 7148): Reallocating 0x0052f1a8
byte notification buffer.
06/17/2003 04:00:11 psFsMonitorThread(tid 7148): Journal DB will be
restarted for FS 'F:\'.
06/17/2003 08:00:02 psFsMonitorThread(tid 7148): Notification buffer overrun
for monitored FS 'F:\'.
06/17/2003 08:00:02 psFsMonitorThread(tid 7148): Reallocating 0x00638863
byte notification buffer.
06/17/2003 08:00:02 psFsMonitorThread(tid 7148): Journal DB will be
restarted for FS 'F:\'.
06/17/2003 08:00:26 psFsMonitorThread(tid 7148): Notification buffer overrun
for monitored FS 'F:\'.
06/17/2003 08:00:26 psFsMonitorThread(tid 7148): Reallocating 0x00777076
byte notification buffer.
06/17/2003 08:00:26 psFsMonitorThread(tid 7148): Journal DB will be
restarted for FS 'F:\'.
06/17/2003 08:00:49 psFsMonitorThread(tid 7148): The maximum number of
buffer overun restarts for JFS 'F:\' exceeded,monitor thread terminating.
06/17/2003 08:00:49 JbbMonitorThread(): FS Monitor thread, tid 7148 ended
with return code 122.

Dsmerror.log
06/17/2003 01:35:18 ANS1028S Internal program error.  Please see your
service representative.
06/17/2003 01:35:18 ANS1512E Scheduled event 'WIN_SYS_1' failed.  Return
code = 12.

Any ideas?

Thanks,
--
Bruce Kamp
Midrange Systems Analyst II
Memorial Healthcare System
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P: (954) 987-2020 x4597
F: (954) 985-1404
---

Re: New to TSM

[Kamp, Bruce]

How large of an envirnment are you going to back up?
I have about 200 nodes (AIX, NT/2000  Netware) backing up about 200Gig a
night  am using an IBM M80 with 4 3590 E1A's (soon to be 6 H1A's)...

Bruce Kamp

-Original Message-
From: Mark Cini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 5:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: New to TSM


Hello all.

We are in the process of ditching our current BackupExec/ArcServe setup in
favor of a central TSM environment.  We have decided to expand our
existing 3494 tape library (additional frame w/ 2 3590 drives, SCSI) but
haven't selected the hardware/operating system for the TSM server.  These
are our options:

Dell 2600/Win2000
pSeries/AIX
iSeries820/PASE

Any recommendations for one system over another for the TSM server?  The
Win2000 option would be the cheapest but would it cause headaches down the
road?

thanks,

Mark Cini
Systems Administrator
CorrFlex Display  Packaging

Re: TSM and Servers running Nortel Symposium software

[Kamp, Bruce]

We have Symposium in house but they will not let us use TSM.  VENDORS!


--
Bruce Kamp
Midrange Systems Analyst II
Memorial Healthcare System
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
P: (954) 987-2020 x4597
F: (954) 985-1404
---


-Original Message-
From: Amini, Mehdi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 10:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Has anyone backed up Nortel Symposium software using TSM?

Mehdi Amini
LAN/WAN Engineer
ValueOptions
12369 Sunrise Valley Drive
Suite C
Reston, VA 20191
Phone: 703-390-6855
Fax: 703-390-2581



**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.If
you have received this email in error please notify the sender by email,
delete and destroy this message and its attachments.

**

Re: Tape Question

[Kamp, Bruce]

Thanks for the q libr command found out that 400 is my private category.
When I look in my act log I find no references to these volumes  they do
not show up in q vol or q libv.  Any suggestions about there real status?
Could they be volumes that were mounted in a drive when TSM went down?  Also
I tried to check them in they failed on reading the label!
I guess my question is does anybody any reason to NOT recheck them in as
scratch  overwrite the existing label?  Did I miss someplace else to check
the status of these tapes with TSM?

Thanks,
--
Bruce Kamp
Midrange Systems Analyst II
Memorial Healthcare System
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
P: (954) 987-2020 x4597
F: (954) 985-1404
---


-Original Message-
From: Richard Sims [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 8:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

ANR8774W Volume D00710 not checked into library 3494LIB but is using
category 400.

What is category 400?

Bruce - The message description tells most of the story, but oddly doesn't
advise the obvious: do 'Query LIBRary' and you should see your
defined category codes (with +1 for 3590).

  Richard Sims, BU

Tape Question

[Kamp, Bruce]

Environment:
TSM 5.1.1.6 on AIX 4.3.3 ML10
3494 library with 4 3590 drives.  I share the library with our mainframe.

I was watching my TSM server come up this morning  noticed the following
messages in my activity log:

ANR8774W Volume D00197 not checked into library 3494LIB but is using
category 400.
ANR8774W Volume D00200 not checked into library 3494LIB but is using
category 400.
ANR8774W Volume D00232 not checked into library 3494LIB but is using
category 400.
ANR8774W Volume D00233 not checked into library 3494LIB but is using
category 400.
ANR8774W Volume D00325 not checked into library 3494LIB but is using
category 400.
ANR8774W Volume D00355 not checked into library 3494LIB but is using
category 400.
ANR8774W Volume D00710 not checked into library 3494LIB but is using
category 400.

What is category 400?

Thanks,
--
Bruce Kamp
Midrange Systems Analyst II
Memorial Healthcare System
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P: (954) 987-2020 x4597
F: (954) 985-1404
---

Re: Novell-Server abends with TSM Client 4.2

[Kamp, Bruce]

What are your versions of Netware (also TSA nlm's), TSM server  client?


--
Bruce Kamp
Midrange Systems Analyst II
Memorial Healthcare System
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
P: (954) 987-2020 x4597
F: (954) 985-1404
---


-Original Message-
From: Torsten Strecke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 3:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hello,

when I want to restore some files per browser session the dsmcad.nlm causes
many abends on the Netware-Server. It happens during  the login on the
TSM-Server. The number of the abends raises to fifty. The functionality of
the server is still present.
Maybe someone got the same problem and looked for a solution.

Thanks,
Torsten

Re: Windows 2000 - not backing up all drives

[Kamp, Bruce]

Is there anything in the dsmsched.log or dsmerror.log or the event logs?
Also check the permissions on the drive.  The default user for the service
is SYSTEM unless you specify a different one.

---
Bruce Kamp
Midrange Systems Analyst II
Memorial Healthcare System
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597
Fax: (954) 985-1404
---


-Original Message-
From: Brenda Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 11:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Windows 2000 - not backing up all drives


We are using the 'domain all-local' parameter in our dsm.opt file but the
backup is consistently skipping one drive.  (Of course, it is the most
critical drive with the largest amount of data.)  Has anyone else run into
this problem?  Is it a security issue?

It was previously backing up this drive until about a month ago.  I am
unsure what changed on the server at that time.

Any help would be greatly appreciated!

Thanks,

Brenda Collins
Sr. Systems Engineer
ING - Americas Infrastructure Services
(612) 342-3839  (Office)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Netware Errors

[Kamp, Bruce]

Environment:
TSM 5.1.1.6 on AIX 4.3.3
Client 5.1.5.15 on Netware 6
Does anybody know what these errors mean?

03/27/2003 09:28:27 Attempt to free unknown pointer. Addr 19bd6180, File
agntinit.cpp, Line 358
03/27/2003 09:28:27 Attempt to free unknown pointer. Addr 19bdb083, File
agntinit.cpp, Line 358
03/27/2003 09:28:27 Attempt to free unknown pointer. Addr 19bdb088, File
agntinit.cpp, Line 358
03/27/2003 09:28:27 Attempt to free unknown pointer. Addr 19bdb0b8, File
agntinit.cpp, Line 358
03/27/2003 09:28:27 Attempt to free unknown pointer. Addr 19bd6164, File
agntinit.cpp, Line 360

Thanks,
--
Bruce Kamp
Midrange Systems Analyst II
Memorial Healthcare System
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P: (954) 987-2020 x4597
F: (954) 985-1404
---

Re: File scan takes ages during backup

[Kamp, Bruce]

I know I have one 2000 server with over a million files.  Before journal
backups it took about 1-2 hours to backup the server.  After it takes about
20min!

---
Bruce Kamp
Midrange Systems Analyst II
Memorial Healthcare System
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597
Fax: (954) 985-1404
---


-Original Message-
From: Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 9:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: File scan takes ages during backup


Hi Bruce!
Thank you for your reply!
The total amount of files is about 600.000 files, so journaling is maybe a
bit overdone. The problem is not the amount of files, but the time in takes
to scan them. It MUCH slower than on other Windows NT clients. Kindest
regards, Eric van Loon KLM Royal Dutch Airlines


-Original Message-
From: Kamp, Bruce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 14:13
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: File scan takes ages during backup


You might want to consider journal backups!  Depending on how many files
change on a daily basis.

---
Bruce Kamp
Midrange Systems Analyst II
Memorial Healthcare System
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597
Fax: (954) 985-1404
---


-Original Message-
From: Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 7:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: File scan takes ages during backup


Hi *SM-ers!
TSM server 4.2.2.0, TSM client 4.2.2.0 on Windows NT SP4.
I have got a strange problem with one of my Windows NT clients. The backup
cycle runs for almost 24 hours. The thing is that the actual backup runs
fine:

21-03-2003 06:15:17 Directory--  0
\\zspln59848\f$\Data\Dep_NP\B777_flight_technical\Performance\Operation
Manual\Concept\Performance Inflight [Sent]
21-03-2003 06:15:17 Normal File--  3.852.288
\\zspln59848\f$\Data\Dep_NP\B777_flight_technical\Performance\Operation
Manual\Concept\Performance Dispatch\PD-200IGW-GE90-94B-JAA-Sec11
PP2.backup.fm [Sent]
21-03-2003 06:15:19 Normal File-- 3.852.288
\\zspln59848\f$\Data\Dep_NP\B777_flight_technical\Performance\Operation
Manual\Concept\Performance Dispatch\PD-200IGW-GE90-94B-JAA-Sec11 PP2.fm
[Sent] 21-03-2003 06:15:20 Normal File-- 231
\\zspln59848\f$\Data\Dep_NP\B777_flight_technical\Performance\Operation
Manual\Concept\Performance Dispatch\PD-200IGW-GE90-94B-JAA-Sec11 PP2.log
[Sent]

You can see that backing op an almost 4 Mb. file takes about 2 seconds,
which is ok. But the file scanning runs at an excruciating low speed:

21-03-2003 11:25:41 ANS1898I * Processed   593.000 files *
21-03-2003 11:27:06 ANS1898I * Processed   593.500 files *
21-03-2003 11:28:24 ANS1898I * Processed   594.000 files *
21-03-2003 11:29:39 ANS1898I * Processed   594.500 files *
21-03-2003 11:30:43 ANS1898I * Processed   595.000 files *
21-03-2003 11:31:53 ANS1898I * Processed   595.500 files *
21-03-2003 11:33:12 ANS1898I * Processed   596.000 files *
21-03-2003 11:35:00 ANS1898I * Processed   596.500 files *
21-03-2003 11:36:41 ANS1898I * Processed   597.000 files *
21-03-2003 11:37:40 ANS1898I * Processed   597.500 files *
21-03-2003 11:40:00 ANS1898I * Processed   598.000 files *
21-03-2003 11:40:59 ANS1898I * Processed   598.500 files *
21-03-2003 11:41:45 ANS1898I * Processed   599.000 files *

Scanning 6000 files takes 16 minutes!!!
Has anybody seen this before? I really don't know how to 'debug' this...
Thanks in advance for any reply!!! Kindest regards, Eric van Loon KLM Royal
Dutch Airlines


**
For information, services and offers, please visit our web site:
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential
and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may
be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to
this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If
you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately
by return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart
Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be
liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any
attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
**

Novell Client Problems

[Kamp, Bruce]

Environment:
Server:  TSM 5.1.1.6 on AIX 4.3.3
Client:  TSM 5.1.5.15 on Netware 6

In my dsmerror.log I keep getting the following errors:
03/20/2003 00:59:50 sessSendVerb: Error sending Verb, rc: -50
03/20/2003 00:59:51 sessSendVerb: Error sending Verb, rc: -50
03/20/2003 00:59:52 sessSendVerb: Error sending Verb, rc: -50
03/20/2003 00:59:53 sessSendVerb: Error sending Verb, rc: -50
03/20/2003 00:59:54 sessSendVerb: Error sending Verb, rc: -50

Backups for this node are extremely slow!  Any ideas?

Thanks,
--
Bruce Kamp
Midrange Systems Analyst II
Memorial Healthcare System
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P: (954) 987-2020 x4597
F: (954) 985-1404
---

Re: Exchange cross system restore?

[Kamp, Bruce]

Read the Red Book Using Tivoli Data protection for Microsoft Exchange.  The
procedures are in there.  I have done it a couple of times to recovery a
delete mailbox


--
Bruce Kamp
Midrange Systems Analyst II
Memorial Healthcare System
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
P: (954) 987-2020 x4597
F: (954) 985-1404
---


-Original Message-
From: Coats, Jack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 11:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Exchange cross system restore?


I have multiple exchange servers with TDP on them.  I have another Exchange
server used for DR purposes only.

I would like to restore one of the Exchange servers to my DR Exchange
server.

I went into the TDPExchange/dsm.opt and changed the node name to the name of
one of the production servers, and was able to restore the production
servers data.

Now my problem, getting Exchange to start.  The services are not starting.

Any suggestions? ... or a completely different procedure?


I must be able to do this so I can complete the acceptance testing to
de-commission a BackupEXEC server we are using for Exchange (everything else
that was on BackupEXEC is on TSM now!)

TIA ... Jack

Re: License Pricing

[Kamp, Bruce]

Has anybody heard how they are going to handle licensing on Intel Xeon
processor servers with hyper-threading?  If you have a dual processor server
with hyper-threading it looks like 4 to the OS...

--
Bruce Kamp
Midrange Systems Analyst II
Memorial Healthcare System
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
P: (954) 987-2020 x4597
F: (954) 985-1404
---


-Original Message-
From: Kauffman, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 1:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: License Pricing


I'm probably going to be looking at new NT licenses soon -- and if they
think they're going to get this kind of vigorish from us, they're crazy.
We'll end up running NT Backup to on-board CDR drives -- the drives are
around $100 and you can get 100 disks from OfficeMax for the cost of sales
tax and a stamp if you watch the sales flyers. 

I always thought the ADSM 2.x price of $100 per NT *box* was a good fit --
and I haven't seen ANYTHING in TSM 4.x or 5.x that would justify a 500% (or
higher -- would a 4-way box go for $2,112?) price increase.

Somehow I see a come to glory meeting with my CIO, my IBM Marketing rep,
my Tivoli marketing rep, and our preferred VAR in my future.

And I *still* want to see a comprehensive, easily understood price list,
readily accessible, WITHOUT registration or a customer number. Discounting
may be customer specific and proprietary, but in this day and age, price is
not and trying to hide it just means you no longer want to sell to ME. I
won't do an NDA on prices and I won't accept an NDA on prices.


Tom Kauffman
NIBCO, Inc

-Original Message-
From: Coats, Jack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 8:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: License Pricing


Yes, I just purchased a single processor license, it was $528 or so USD. The
ones I purchased just before year end were about $218USD.  

Unless new customers are coming in with huge discounts, I think that TSM is
now priced out of the market.

As a consultant (in a former life) I would be seriously considering taking
my customers to other products, if I could find one that fits.

I love the TSM concept, but economics is what rules.  And there is not
enough difference in the technological differences to make up the economic
ones at this point.

 -Original Message-
 From: Cahill, Ricky [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 3:46 AM
 To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject:  License Pricing
 
 Just got a quote back for some Win2k licenses and was rather surprised 
 at the massive increase in price, ok I've not bought a license for a 
 couple of years but this is bonkers..
 
 single processor server £391.98 + vat per server
 dual processor server   £783.96 + vat per server
 quad processor server   £1567.92 + vat per server
 
 Anyone know if a license bought prior to this stupid per cpu idea is 
 valid for one server or one cpu??
 
 
..Rikk
 
 
 **
 
 **
 Equitas Limited, 33 St Mary Axe, London EC3A 8LL, UK
 NOTICE: This message is intended only for use by the named addressee
 and may contain privileged and/or confidential information.  If you are
 not the named addressee you should not disseminate, copy or take any
 action in reliance on it.  If you have received this message in error
 please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] and delete the message and any
 attachments accompanying it immediately.
 
 Equitas reserve the right to monitor and/or record emails, (including 
 the contents thereof) sent and received via its network for any lawful 
 business purpose to the extent permitted by applicable law
 
 Registered in England: Registered no. 3173352 Registered address above
 **
 
 **

Re: Duration timeout during Expiration

[Kamp, Bruce]

I run expiration after migration

--
Bruce Kamp
Midrange Systems Analyst II
Memorial Healthcare System
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
P: (954) 987-2020 x4597
F: (954) 985-1404
---


-Original Message-
From: Michael Raine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 10:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Duration timeout during Expiration


Hello All,


I currently have a duration limit set while running expiration.
Occasionally while the processes is running the limit is ignored or not
rezognized and expiration continues over the assigned specified time limit
(currently set for 4 hours and the last expiration process ran for 9 hours).

This causes migration processes that are scheduled after the expiration is
scheduled to finish to fail with lock failures.

Has anyone else experienced this problems

Thanks