Re: Very weird design change SAP HANA client

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi Del!
Thanks again for the explanation. I will plan a meeting with our SAP guys and 
discuss with them what to do.
Just out of curiosity: why is the DP for SAP HANA and the DP for ERP client 
creating archive files where the other TDP clients are all creating backup 
files?
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
Air France/KLM Storage Engineering

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Del 
Hoobler
Sent: maandag 1 augustus 2016 17:19
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Very weird design change SAP HANA client

Hi Eric,

I don't have much else to offer other than monitoring the SAP HANA backups to 
ensure any failures are caught and corrected promptly. If you have a two week 
retention period, you should be able to detect failed backups and react well 
before all backups have expired. 

It may also help if you placed a requirement against SAP directly to provide 
the enhancement as well. If they see more heat on this, it could motivate them 
to release this sooner and specify a target date. 

Thank you,

Del



"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU> wrote on 08/01/2016
05:03:29 AM:

> From: "Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM" <eric-van.l...@klm.com>
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Date: 08/01/2016 05:04 AM
> Subject: Re: Very weird design change SAP HANA client Sent by: "ADSM: 
> Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU>
> 
> Hi Del!
> Thank you very much for your explanation. And sorry for blaming IBM 
> for this. I'm really puzzled over what to do next. Like I said, 
> implementing policy based expiration introduces the risk of losing all 
> your backups when a client stops backing up for a certain amount of 
> time. The option of deleting backup data through SAP HANA Studio is 
> also not very attractive: I know the customer will do this in the 
> beginning, but over time they will become sloppy or just forget...
> Kind regards,
> Eric van Loon
> Air France/KLM Storage Engineering
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf 
> Of Del Hoobler
> Sent: vrijdag 29 juli 2016 19:05
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: Very weird design change SAP HANA client
> 
> Eric,
> 
> This "design change" is a "change" from the Data Protection for ERP 
> perspective, but not from the Data Protection for ERP for SAP HANA 
> perspective, which has always worked this way.
> 
> This design "change" is a result of a current limitation in the SAP 
> HANA BACKINT API and is expected to be temporary.  This backup API 
> streams the backup data to the DP for SAP HANA client via named pipes 
> and today it gives no indication whether the data stream was complete 
> or the pipe was closed prematurely due to some error.
> 
> We don't want to expire a prior/older backup version unless we know we 
> have a successful new backup version so we do not currently offer 
> expiration of backups based on version limit.  However, we do plan to 
> provide that capability once SAP implements the enhancement to the 
> backup API we have requested (to indicate whether or not all the data 
> was streamed  successfully).  SAP did indicate they plan to provide 
> that enhancement but we do not yet have a target date for that.
> 
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> Del
> 
> 
> 
> "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU> wrote on 07/29/2016
> 07:23:32 AM:
> 
> > From: "Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM" <eric-van.l...@klm.com>
> > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> > Date: 07/29/2016 07:24 AM
> > Subject: Very weird design change SAP HANA client Sent by: "ADSM: 
> > Dist

> > Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU>
> > 
> > Hello all!
> > Recently we started to use the Data Protection for SAP HANA client. 
> > I created a TSM node identical to the already existing Data 
> > Protection

> > for SAP node and now customer reported that he received the 
> > following error message after a successful backup:
> > 
> > BKI8649E: The automatic deletion of backups is not supported. Change 
> > the value of the MAX_VERSIONS parameter to 0
> > 
> > I googled for the BKI8649E and stumbled across technote IT11810 
> > which explains that versioning through the MAX_VERSIONS parameter is 
> > no longer supported. You now have to use TSM to control the 
> > retention for

> > your SAP backups. That would be very nice if the TDP client was 
> > creating backup files on TSM and was working like the Oracle client 
> > (active files are kept fo

Re: Very weird design change SAP HANA client

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi Del!
Thank you very much for your explanation. And sorry for blaming IBM for this. 
I'm really puzzled over what to do next. Like I said, implementing policy based 
expiration introduces the risk of losing all your backups when a client stops 
backing up for a certain amount of time. The option of deleting backup data 
through SAP HANA Studio is also not very attractive: I know the customer will 
do this in the beginning, but over time they will become sloppy or just 
forget...
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
Air France/KLM Storage Engineering

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Del 
Hoobler
Sent: vrijdag 29 juli 2016 19:05
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Very weird design change SAP HANA client

Eric,

This "design change" is a "change" from the Data Protection for ERP 
perspective, but not from the Data Protection for ERP for SAP HANA perspective, 
which has always worked this way.

This design "change" is a result of a current limitation in the SAP HANA 
BACKINT API and is expected to be temporary.  This backup API streams the 
backup data to the DP for SAP HANA client via named pipes and today it gives no 
indication whether the data stream was complete or the pipe was closed 
prematurely due to some error. 

We don't want to expire a prior/older backup version unless we know we have a 
successful new backup version so we do not currently offer expiration of 
backups based on version limit.  However, we do plan to provide that capability 
once SAP implements the enhancement to the backup API we have requested (to 
indicate whether or not all the data was streamed  successfully).  SAP did 
indicate they plan to provide that enhancement but we do not yet have a target 
date for that. 


Thank you,

Del



"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU> wrote on 07/29/2016
07:23:32 AM:

> From: "Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM" <eric-van.l...@klm.com>
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Date: 07/29/2016 07:24 AM
> Subject: Very weird design change SAP HANA client Sent by: "ADSM: Dist 
> Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU>
> 
> Hello all!
> Recently we started to use the Data Protection for SAP HANA client. 
> I created a TSM node identical to the already existing Data Protection 
> for SAP node and now customer reported that he received the following 
> error message after a successful backup:
> 
> BKI8649E: The automatic deletion of backups is not supported. Change 
> the value of the MAX_VERSIONS parameter to 0
> 
> I googled for the BKI8649E and stumbled across technote IT11810 which 
> explains that versioning through the MAX_VERSIONS parameter is no 
> longer supported. You now have to use TSM to control the retention for 
> your SAP backups. That would be very nice if the TDP client was 
> creating backup files on TSM and was working like the Oracle client 
> (active files are kept forever until they are marked inactive by 
> RMAN/TDP for Oracle). But the DP for SAP client creates archive files, 
> so when you backup your SAP database, the files are kept for the 
> amount of time set in the archive copy group. This means that if you 
> have a copygroup setting of 14 days and you do not backup your 
> database for 14 days for some reason, on day 15 you no longer have any 
> backup available for recovery!!!
> I think this is absolutely unacceptable and I really don't understand 
> why IBM has decided to change this.
> The only work around one has is to set retver to unlimited and delete 
> the obsolete backup versions through HANA Studio. This is also 
> unacceptable I think, this is moving a design flaw to the customer
side.
> Am I the only one struggling with this issue?
> Kind regards,
> Eric van Loon
> Air France/KLM Storage Engineering
> 
> For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
> http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain 
> confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. 
> If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the 
> e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and 
> that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly 
> prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by 
> error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and 
> delete this message.
> 
> Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/ or 
> its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete 
> transmission of this e-mail or a

Very weird design change SAP HANA client

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hello all!
Recently we started to use the Data Protection for SAP HANA client. I created a 
TSM node identical to the already existing Data Protection for SAP node and now 
customer reported that he received the following error message after a 
successful backup:

BKI8649E: The automatic deletion of backups is not supported. Change the value 
of the MAX_VERSIONS parameter to 0

I googled for the BKI8649E and stumbled across technote IT11810 which explains 
that versioning through the MAX_VERSIONS parameter is no longer supported. You 
now have to use TSM to control the retention for your SAP backups. That would 
be very nice if the TDP client was creating backup files on TSM and was working 
like the Oracle client (active files are kept forever until they are marked 
inactive by RMAN/TDP for Oracle). But the DP for SAP client creates archive 
files, so when you backup your SAP database, the files are kept for the amount 
of time set in the archive copy group. This means that if you have a copygroup 
setting of 14 days and you do not backup your database for 14 days for some 
reason, on day 15 you no longer have any backup available for recovery!!!
I think this is absolutely unacceptable and I really don't understand why IBM 
has decided to change this.
The only work around one has is to set retver to unlimited and delete the 
obsolete backup versions through HANA Studio. This is also unacceptable I 
think, this is moving a design flaw to the customer side.
Am I the only one struggling with this issue?
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
Air France/KLM Storage Engineering

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message.

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

Re: TSM 7.1.6 binary truncated?

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi Zoltan!
That's the exact same error I got. I tried both service.boulder.ibm.com and 
public.dhe.ibm.com, same result. I also tried unpacking the file on my desktop 
using 7zip: also an error. I downloaded the file directly to the Linux server: 
same error. Only the version I downloaded from Fix Central unpacked without 
errors. The strange thing is that the file sizes are identical. Hash 
calculation by using HashCalc showed a different MD5 hash:
The file from Fix Central: 62a5b10ceb53524137d1709e14cabee1
The file from boulder: 3805e829231988ac9dd51abbd44b2081
Really weird...
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
Air France/KLM Storage Engineering

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Zoltan 
Forray
Sent: donderdag 7 juli 2016 17:45
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: TSM 7.1.6 binary truncated?

I just finished downloading and when I unzip it with 7z, it says "Warnings:
 There are some data after the end of the payload data"

On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM < 
eric-van.l...@klm.com> wrote:

> The code is definitely broken on several IBM download sites... I 
> finally found a version through Fix Central which is OK.
> Kind regards,
> Eric van Loon
> Air France/KLM Storage Engineering
>
> From: Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM
> Sent: donderdag 7 juli 2016 13:25
> To: ADSM-L <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU>
> Subject: TSM 7.1.6 binary truncated?
>
> Hi guys!
> Has anybody been able to extract the Linux 7.1.6 bin file 
> successfully? If I try it on Linux I receive the following error:
>
> # ./7.1.6.000-TIV-TSMSRV-Linuxx86_64.bin
> UnZipSFX 6.00 of 20 April 2009, by Info-ZIP (http://www.info-zip.org).
>   End-of-central-directory signature not found.
>
> I tried extracting it on my desktop using 7zip, but the result is an 
> error too while extraction the last file 
> (com.tivoli.dsm.server.linux.x86_64_7.1.6.20160609_1711.zip). The 
> filesize on my pc is exactly the same as on the IBM server 
> (service.boulder.ibm.com), so could it be that the file is truncated on the 
> IBM side?
> Thanks for any help in advance!
> Kind regards,
> Eric van Loon
> Air France/KLM Storage Engineering
>
> 
> For information, services and offers, please visit our web site:
> http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain 
> confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. 
> If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the 
> e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and 
> that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly 
> prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by 
> error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this 
> message.
>
> Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or 
> its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete 
> transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay 
> in receipt.
> Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal 
> Dutch
> Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with 
> registered number 33014286
> 
>



--
*Zoltan Forray*
TSM Software & Hardware Administrator
Xymon Monitor Administrator
VMware Administrator (in training)
Virginia Commonwealth University
UCC/Office of Technology Services
www.ucc.vcu.edu
zfor...@vcu.edu - 804-828-4807
Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will never 
use email to request that you reply with your password, social security number 
or confidential personal information. For more details visit 
http://infosecurity.vcu.edu/phishing.html

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. 
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

Re: TSM 7.1.6 binary truncated?

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

The code is definitely broken on several IBM download sites... I finally found 
a version through Fix Central which is OK.
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
Air France/KLM Storage Engineering

From: Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM
Sent: donderdag 7 juli 2016 13:25
To: ADSM-L <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU>
Subject: TSM 7.1.6 binary truncated?

Hi guys!
Has anybody been able to extract the Linux 7.1.6 bin file successfully? If I 
try it on Linux I receive the following error:

# ./7.1.6.000-TIV-TSMSRV-Linuxx86_64.bin
UnZipSFX 6.00 of 20 April 2009, by Info-ZIP (http://www.info-zip.org).
  End-of-central-directory signature not found.

I tried extracting it on my desktop using 7zip, but the result is an error too 
while extraction the last file 
(com.tivoli.dsm.server.linux.x86_64_7.1.6.20160609_1711.zip). The filesize on 
my pc is exactly the same as on the IBM server (service.boulder.ibm.com), so 
could it be that the file is truncated on the IBM side?
Thanks for any help in advance!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
Air France/KLM Storage Engineering


For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message.

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

TSM 7.1.6 binary truncated?

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi guys!
Has anybody been able to extract the Linux 7.1.6 bin file successfully? If I 
try it on Linux I receive the following error:

# ./7.1.6.000-TIV-TSMSRV-Linuxx86_64.bin
UnZipSFX 6.00 of 20 April 2009, by Info-ZIP (http://www.info-zip.org).
  End-of-central-directory signature not found.

I tried extracting it on my desktop using 7zip, but the result is an error too 
while extraction the last file 
(com.tivoli.dsm.server.linux.x86_64_7.1.6.20160609_1711.zip). The filesize on 
my pc is exactly the same as on the IBM server (service.boulder.ibm.com), so 
could it be that the file is truncated on the IBM side?
Thanks for any help in advance!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
Air France/KLM Storage Engineering


For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message.

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

Re: Size of stored backupsets

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi Francisco!
All data is on (virtual) tape.
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
Air France/KLM Storage Engineering.

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of 
Francisco Javier
Sent: maandag 4 juli 2016 15:26
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Size of stored backupsets

What pool are you using to store yours backupsets???
El 4 jul. 2016 3:12 a. m., "Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM" < 
eric-van.l...@klm.com> escribió:

> Hi guys!
> Does anybody know a way to retrieve the amount of TSM storage occupied 
> by backupsets? I checked the backupsets table, but their sizes are not 
> stored in there...
> Thanks for any help in advance!
> Kind regards,
> Eric van Loon
> Air France/KLM Storage Engineering
> 
> For information, services and offers, please visit our web site:
> http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain 
> confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. 
> If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the 
> e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and 
> that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly 
> prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by 
> error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this 
> message.
>
> Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or 
> its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete 
> transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay 
> in receipt.
> Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal 
> Dutch
> Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with 
> registered number 33014286
> 
>

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. 
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

Size of stored backupsets

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi guys!
Does anybody know a way to retrieve the amount of TSM storage occupied by 
backupsets? I checked the backupsets table, but their sizes are not stored in 
there...
Thanks for any help in advance!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
Air France/KLM Storage Engineering

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message.

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

Blueprint performance script

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi guys!
I would like to use the tsmdiskperf.pl script which is part of the Blueprints. 
We however install TSM on a cluster, so our file systems are all Veritas 
filesystems, where the Blueprint uses the standard Linux driver. So to trick 
the script I would like to create a small bash script which collects the same 
input as the following command:

lsblk -l -o NAME,MOUNTPOINT

It returns something like a disk device name (ie /dev/sda1) along with the 
filesystem which is mounted on it. But I would like to know the exact output  
format, especially when a filesystem uses multiple disk devices. Can anybody 
sent me the output from this command if you are using the standard Linux driver?
Thank you VERY much in advance!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
Air France/KLM Storage Engineering

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message.

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

Re: File affected in case of a damaged dcf

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi Virginia!
Thanks! This seems to work fine:

ANR4675W QUERY DAMAGED: This command may take a while to finish.

Do you wish to proceed? (Yes (Y)/No (N)) y

 Object ID: 1,773,281
Client's Name for File: \USERS\KLM35757\DESKTOP\TSM PERF\TSM DEDUP 
PERFORMANCE.DOCX
  Type: Bkup
 Node Name: KLM114545
Filespace Name: \\klm114545\c$
 State: Active
Insertion time: 06/09/2016 07:53:53 AM

Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
Air France/KLM Storage Engineering

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of 
Virginia Moyer
Sent: woensdag 8 juni 2016 16:07
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: File affected in case of a damaged dcf

You can issue Q DAMAGED  TYPE=INVENTORY.   This command must be 
issued from the admin client since it could be a potentially long-running 
command.

-Virginia Moyer





From:   Rick Adamson <rickadam...@segrocers.com>
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU, 
Date:   06/08/2016 06:51 AM
Subject:Re: [ADSM-L] File affected in case of a damaged dcf
Sent by:"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU>



Haven't tried it but can you use the "REPLICATE NODE" with PREVIEW and LIST 
options ?

-Rick Adamson


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Loon, 
EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2016 9:27 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] File affected in case of a damaged dcf

Hi guys!
I'm doing some testing with a directory container storagepool. I deliberately 
damaged a dcf file and tested the audit function, everything seems to work as 
expected. When a tape is corrupted, the activity log shows which user file is 
affected by the detected corruption, however in case of a corrupted container 
file TSM does not tell you:

06/08/2016 14:30:09  ANR4891I AUDIT CONTAINER process 136 ended for the 
/tech/tsm/AMSE3/container12/00/002e.dcf container: 1162 data 
extents inspected, 1 data extents marked as damaged, 0 data extents previously 
marked as damaged reset to undamaged, and 0 data extents marked as orphaned.

Does anybody know how one can find which file is affected by the damaged extent?
Thanks for any reply in advance!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
Air France/KLM Storage Engineering

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.klm.com=CwIFAg=AzgFQeXLLKhxSQaoFCm29A=eqh5PzQPIsPArLoI_uV1mKvhIpcNP1MsClDPSJjFfxw=uRpyWSVc7OaHDTx1xnzbBEByiXsi4NlCnHGlT_HABGY=ESjhw6zYHDR9i4Z0qPmOaN0L6wahGtO1LLcXDTGLGtc=
. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged 
material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are 
notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied 
or distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment 
is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail 
by error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete 
this message.

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286


For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. 
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

Re: File affected in case of a damaged dcf

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi Rick!
This might work if you are using node replication, but I'm not
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
Air France/KLM Storage Engineering

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Rick 
Adamson
Sent: woensdag 8 juni 2016 15:49
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: File affected in case of a damaged dcf

Haven't tried it but can you use the "REPLICATE NODE" with PREVIEW and LIST 
options ?

-Rick Adamson


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Loon, 
EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2016 9:27 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] File affected in case of a damaged dcf

Hi guys!
I'm doing some testing with a directory container storagepool. I deliberately 
damaged a dcf file and tested the audit function, everything seems to work as 
expected. When a tape is corrupted, the activity log shows which user file is 
affected by the detected corruption, however in case of a corrupted container 
file TSM does not tell you:

06/08/2016 14:30:09  ANR4891I AUDIT CONTAINER process 136 ended for the 
/tech/tsm/AMSE3/container12/00/002e.dcf container: 1162 data 
extents inspected, 1 data extents marked as damaged, 0 data extents previously 
marked as damaged reset to undamaged, and 0 data extents marked as orphaned.

Does anybody know how one can find which file is affected by the damaged extent?
Thanks for any reply in advance!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
Air France/KLM Storage Engineering

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.klm.com=CwIFAg=AzgFQeXLLKhxSQaoFCm29A=eqh5PzQPIsPArLoI_uV1mKvhIpcNP1MsClDPSJjFfxw=uRpyWSVc7OaHDTx1xnzbBEByiXsi4NlCnHGlT_HABGY=ESjhw6zYHDR9i4Z0qPmOaN0L6wahGtO1LLcXDTGLGtc=
 . This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged 
material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are 
notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied 
or distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment 
is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail 
by error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete 
this message.

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286


For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. 
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

File affected in case of a damaged dcf

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi guys!
I'm doing some testing with a directory container storagepool. I deliberately 
damaged a dcf file and tested the audit function, everything seems to work as 
expected. When a tape is corrupted, the activity log shows which user file is 
affected by the detected corruption, however in case of a corrupted container 
file TSM does not tell you:

06/08/2016 14:30:09  ANR4891I AUDIT CONTAINER process 136 ended for the 
/tech/tsm/AMSE3/container12/00/002e.dcf container: 1162 data 
extents inspected, 1 data extents marked as damaged, 0 data extents previously 
marked as damaged reset to undamaged, and 0 data extents marked as orphaned.

Does anybody know how one can find which file is affected by the damaged extent?
Thanks for any reply in advance!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
Air France/KLM Storage Engineering

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message.

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

Re: ANR3619W

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi guys!
Thanks for all suggestions! We found the cause: in our case TSM is running on a 
cluster, controlled by Veritas. So TSM is started by the Veritas Cluster 
Services (VCS). Although the VCS executes the startup script through root, it 
uses its own environment. When you update environment variables, like the max 
open files, one has to stop/start the VCS service before the changes are picked 
up...
So we did and now it's working fine.
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
Air France/KLM Storage Engineering

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Zoltan 
Forray
Sent: woensdag 1 juni 2016 13:59
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: ANR3619W

We went through this and found the startup script has the ulimit commands in it 
and were set too low.  Also, did you check /etc/security/limits.conf

https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSATMW_7.1.0/com.ibm.itsm.srv.install.doc/t_srv_startsrv_set_access_ulimit-linux.html

On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 7:16 AM, Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM < 
eric-van.l...@klm.com> wrote:

> Some additional analysis: a cat /proc//limits indeed shows a Max 
> open files 4096... I don't know why, since both the root user as the 
> instance user have the proper settings:
> Root:
> # ulimit -Hn
> 65536
> # ulimit -Sn
> 65536
> Instance user:
> $ ulimit -Hn
> 65536
> $ ulimit -Sn
> 65536
> Kind regards,
> Eric van Loon
> Air France/KLM Storage Engineering
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf 
> Of Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM
> Sent: woensdag 1 juni 2016 12:53
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: ANR3619W
>
> Hi guys!
> I'm setting up a 7.1.5 server on Linux. I followed all specs and I 
> have raised the hard and soft limits for open files to the recommended 
> value of
> 65536 for both the instance user as root. However, I keep on receiving 
> the following message:
> ANR3619W The user limit for open files is below the recommended 
> minimum value of 8192.
> I also checked the db2diag.log file for the value of nofiles and it says:
> nofiles (descriptors)  = 0x0001 which is 65536. So I don't 
> understand why TSM keeps on complaining...
> Thanks for any help in advance!
> Kind regards,
> Eric van Loon
> Air France/KLM Storage Engineering
> 
> For information, services and offers, please visit our web site:
> http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain 
> confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. 
> If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the 
> e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and 
> that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly 
> prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by 
> error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this 
> message.
>
> Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or 
> its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete 
> transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay 
> in receipt.
> Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal 
> Dutch
> Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with 
> registered number 33014286
> 
> 
> For information, services and offers, please visit our web site:
> http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain 
> confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. 
> If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the 
> e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and 
> that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly 
> prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by 
> error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this 
> message.
>
> Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or 
> its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete 
> transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay 
> in receipt.
> Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal 
> Dutch
> Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with 
> registered number 33014286
> 
>
>


--
*Zoltan Forray*
TSM Software & Hardware Administrator
Xymon Monitor Administrator
VMware Administrator (in training)
Virginia Commonwealth University
UCC/Office of Technolog

Re: ANR3619W

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Some additional analysis: a cat /proc//limits indeed shows a Max open 
files 4096... I don't know why, since both the root user as the instance user 
have the proper settings:
Root:
# ulimit -Hn
65536
# ulimit -Sn
65536
Instance user:
$ ulimit -Hn
65536
$ ulimit -Sn
65536
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
Air France/KLM Storage Engineering

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Loon, 
EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM
Sent: woensdag 1 juni 2016 12:53
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: ANR3619W

Hi guys!
I'm setting up a 7.1.5 server on Linux. I followed all specs and I have raised 
the hard and soft limits for open files to the recommended value of 65536 for 
both the instance user as root. However, I keep on receiving the following 
message:
ANR3619W The user limit for open files is below the recommended minimum value 
of 8192.
I also checked the db2diag.log file for the value of nofiles and it says:
nofiles (descriptors)  = 0x0001 which is 65536. So I don't 
understand why TSM keeps on complaining...
Thanks for any help in advance!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
Air France/KLM Storage Engineering

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message.

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286


For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. 
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

ANR3619W

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi guys!
I'm setting up a 7.1.5 server on Linux. I followed all specs and I have raised 
the hard and soft limits for open files to the recommended value of 65536 for 
both the instance user as root. However, I keep on receiving the following 
message:
ANR3619W The user limit for open files is below the recommended minimum value 
of 8192.
I also checked the db2diag.log file for the value of nofiles and it says:
nofiles (descriptors)  = 0x0001
which is 65536. So I don't understand why TSM keeps on complaining...
Thanks for any help in advance!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
Air France/KLM Storage Engineering

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message.

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

Re: DP for SAP HANA with SPS12

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi Del!
Not yet. The environment is not running production yet, but I was hoping to 
give the customer some sort of target date...
We will just try 7.1.3 and see what happens, if I encounter any issues, can I 
just open a PMR for it? Since I'm officially not running a supported stack...
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
Air France/KLM Storage Engineering

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Del 
Hoobler
Sent: donderdag 26 mei 2016 12:36
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: DP for SAP HANA with SPS12

Hi Eric,

We don't have a specific date to share yet.
The development team is looking into this.
Have you tried it yet? Did you run into problems?


Del



"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU> wrote on 05/25/2016
08:39:17 AM:

> From: "Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM" <eric-van.l...@klm.com>
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Date: 05/25/2016 08:41 AM
> Subject: DP for SAP HANA with SPS12
> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU>
> 
> Hi guys!
> One of my customers wants to implement Data Protection for SAP HANA on 
> their SAP HANA appliance. On the IBM support pages I read one of the 
> following supported stacks:
> SAP HANA support package stack SPS 08 up to SPS 11 They are however 
> running SPS12. Does anybody from IBM know if there are any plans to 
> support version 12 in the (very) near future?
> Thanks for any help in advance!
> Kind regards,
> Eric van Loon
> Air France/KLM Storage Engineering
> 
> For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
> http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain 
> confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. 
> If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the 
> e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and 
> that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly 
> prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by 
> error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and 
> delete this message.
> 
> Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/ or 
> its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete 
> transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for 
> any delay in receipt.
> Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal 
> Dutch Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with 
> registered number 33014286
> 
> 

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. 
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

DP for SAP HANA with SPS12

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi guys!
One of my customers wants to implement Data Protection for SAP HANA on their 
SAP HANA appliance. On the IBM support pages I read one of the following 
supported stacks:
SAP HANA support package stack SPS 08 up to SPS 11
They are however running SPS12. Does anybody from IBM know if there are any 
plans to support version 12 in the (very) near future?
Thanks for any help in advance!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
Air France/KLM Storage Engineering

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message.

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

SP for VE (VMware on Linux)

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi guys!
We were able to install TSM for VE 7.1.4 only after first installing the base 
(7.1.3) version first, because of the required license file. I extracted the 
license file tdp4vmw.lic from the 7.1.3 package and placed it into the correct 
location and then tried to install 7.1.4, but that doesn't work either.
Has anybody been able to find a way to install 7.1.4 straight away, along with 
the required license file?
Thanks for any help in advance!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
Air France/KLM Storage Engineering

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message.

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

Re: TSM for VE (DP for VMware on Linux)

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi Bas and Jeanne!
Thanks for the tip! Our IBM contact pointed me to the TSM Wiki site. On this 
site one can find the 'Spectrum Protect for VE 7.1.3 Installation Cookbook' 
(https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/groups/service/html/communityview?communityUuid=869bac74-5fc2-4b94-81a2-6153890e029a#fullpageWidgetId=W1420ccd1a64d_45f8_8f76_fdbd1fa5cb3e=2a46a2a5-8e9a-4c1a-adce-0fbb46f99438)
 which explains the installation and configuration process step-by-step. It's 
really useful for people who are struggling with the installation like I am.
I only need to replace the installation part with the commandline option, but I 
will manage.
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
Air France/KLM Storage Engineering

-Original Message-
From: Bas van Kampen [mailto:b.vankam...@interconnect.nl] 
Sent: woensdag 13 april 2016 16:34
To: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU>; Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM 
<eric-van.l...@klm.com>
Subject: RE: TSM for VE (DP for VMware on Linux)

Hello Eric,

I don't have a complete installer script but,

The installer can also run in command line mode (same questions as in the 
graphical installer). After the installation you can the web gui. You also need 
to install the BA client. 
(http://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SS8TDQ_7.1.4/ve.inst/t_ve_install_lnx_dm.html)

More global information is found here:
http://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SS8TDQ_7.1.4/ve.inst/t_ve_installing.html

One problem I had was that I had to add 'export 
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin' to /etc/init.d/dsmcad (on the 
datamover)

If you have specific questions let me know.

Kind Regards,

Bas van Kampen
Lead Engineer
Interconnect

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Loon, 
EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM
Sent: woensdag 13 april 2016 15:00
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] TSM for VE (DP for VMware on Linux)

Hi guys!
We would like to start testing with Data Protection for WMware on Linux. The 
problem is that most procedures are based on the GUI and we don't have that 
available in or VMware environment. So I'm looking for a step-by-step procedure 
on how to install and configure DP for VMware through the commandline only. Is 
there somebody out there who has such a procedure and who is willing to share 
it with me?
Thank you VERY much in advance!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
Air France/KLM Storage Engineering

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message.

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286


For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. 
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

TSM for VE (DP for VMware on Linux)

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi guys!
We would like to start testing with Data Protection for WMware on Linux. The 
problem is that most procedures are based on the GUI and we don't have that 
available in or VMware environment. So I'm looking for a step-by-step procedure 
on how to install and configure DP for VMware through the commandline only. Is 
there somebody out there who has such a procedure and who is willing to share 
it with me?
Thank you VERY much in advance!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
Air France/KLM Storage Engineering

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message.

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

Re: SQL statement

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi Robert!
Thanks for the tip! You're right, all missing filespaces were not in the 
occupancy table. And to make things even more difficult, some filespaces were 
listed twice, because data for the same filespace resides in the diskpool and 
the primary pool... The latter issue I can solve by adding a o.stgpoolpool_name 
parameter and only include the primary (VTL) pool entries.
Did you find a way to include the filespaces that were not in the occupancy 
table? I want them listed in the exception report too, even though they are not 
taking up space on the TSM server...
Thanks again for your help!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
Air France/KLM Storage Engineering

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Robert 
Talda
Sent: maandag 11 april 2016 19:34
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: SQL statement

EJ:

  Are you sure the missing filespaces have data?  if not, they won’t have 
associated occupancy records and thus won’t appear in the output.

  I trip over that from time to time myself



Robert Talda
EZ-Backup Systems Engineer
Cornell University
+1 607-255-8280
r...@cornell.edu


> On Apr 11, 2016, at 10:07 AM, Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM 
> <eric-van.l...@klm.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi guys!
> I'm trying to create a SQL statement which should list all filespaces, along 
> with their occupancy, with a backup date longer than 2 days ago, but only for 
> nodes with an last access date of today or yesterday. If the node hasn't 
> contacted the server for two days or more it's reported in a different report.
> This is what I came up with thus far:
> 
> SELECT f.node_name AS "Node name", f.filespace_name AS "Filespace", 
> to_char(char(f.backup_end),'-MM-DD') AS "Last Backup Date", 
> CAST(ROUND(o.physical_mb/1024) as int) as "GB Stored" FROM nodes n, 
> filespaces f, occupancy o WHERE o.node_name=n.node_name AND 
> n.node_name=f.node_name AND o.filespace_name=f.filespace_name AND 
> days(f.backup_end)<(days(current_date)-2) AND cast(timestampdiff(16, 
> current_timestamp - n.lastacc_time) as decimal(5,1))>= 2 ORDER BY f.node_name 
> DESC
> 
> I am however missing several filespaces in the output returned. I must be 
> doing something wrong but I can't find what.
> Thanks in advance for any help!
> Kind regards,
> Eric van Loon
> Air France/KLM Storage Engineering
> 
> 
> For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
> http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential 
> and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
> addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may 
> be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to 
> this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you 
> have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by 
> return e-mail, and delete this message.
> 
> Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
> employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
> this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
> Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
> Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered 
> number 33014286
> 


For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. 
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

SQL statement

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi guys!
I'm trying to create a SQL statement which should list all filespaces, along 
with their occupancy, with a backup date longer than 2 days ago, but only for 
nodes with an last access date of today or yesterday. If the node hasn't 
contacted the server for two days or more it's reported in a different report.
This is what I came up with thus far:

SELECT f.node_name AS "Node name", f.filespace_name AS "Filespace", 
to_char(char(f.backup_end),'-MM-DD') AS "Last Backup Date", 
CAST(ROUND(o.physical_mb/1024) as int) as "GB Stored" FROM nodes n, filespaces 
f, occupancy o WHERE o.node_name=n.node_name AND n.node_name=f.node_name AND 
o.filespace_name=f.filespace_name AND days(f.backup_end)<(days(current_date)-2) 
AND cast(timestampdiff(16, current_timestamp - n.lastacc_time) as 
decimal(5,1))>= 2 ORDER BY f.node_name DESC

I am however missing several filespaces in the output returned. I must be doing 
something wrong but I can't find what.
Thanks in advance for any help!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
Air France/KLM Storage Engineering


For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message.

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

Re: Deduplication and database backups

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi Arni!
Just a thought: could it be that Oracle compression is turned on?
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
Air France/KLM Storage Engineering

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Stefan 
Folkerts
Sent: donderdag 31 maart 2016 17:55
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Deduplication and database backups

I've seen plenty of databases go to container pools and get fair to good 
deduplications results even on the first backup.
It should not matter that it is one large object, it will make the chunks 
larger but normally you should still get some deduplication as long as it's not 
encrypted.
It would seem like something strange that might just be HANA specific?

On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Arni Snorri Eggertsson 
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I want to hear what others are doing in regards of deduplication and 
> large files / database backups,
>
> on a recent setup we are taking backups of a SAP Hana system to a 
> direcotry container,  I see great dedup stats when the system is doing 
> log backups, but I get no deduplication effects when we are doing full 
> backups, the database is roughly 250 GB in size,  and it looks like 
> TSM sees the object as one file.
>
> ANR0951I Session 550996 for node x processed 1 files using inline 
> deduplication. 251,754,067,764 bytes were reduced by 0 bytes.  (SESSION:
> 550996)
>
>
> I am not 100% sure how to handle this,     are others using directory
> containers at all?  are you using them for TDP Database backups ? any 
> thoughts ?
>
>
>
>
> *Arni Snorri Eggertsson*
> ar...@gormur.com
>

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. 
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

Re: cloud pools, directory containers, dedup etc.

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi Gary!
As far as I know Amazon cloud is not (yet) supported... Only Cleversafe, 
Softlayer and Swift are.
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
Air France/KLM Storage Engineering


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Lee, 
Gary
Sent: dinsdag 22 maart 2016 19:35
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: cloud pools, directory containers, dedup etc.

Just jumping into the cloud storage arena with tsm.
Just installed server 7.1.5 to experiment with cloud storage.
We have been mandated to replace our largely tape based environment with amazon 
cloud storage.

I know very little of tsm's implementation of this, and how it may be used.

I see lots of mention of dedup, of which I am somewhat scared. I have always 
preferred such things as dedup and compression be performed at the storage 
hardware level.
So,this all prompts several questions.


1.   Are there use case docs or best practice docs for implementing cloud 
storage in tsm?

2.   What is the impact of dedup on server performance?

3.   What impact does dedup have on database and logging?

4.   Impact on server recovery and disaster protection?

5.   Can we start off without doing dedup, then when comfortable with it 
implement it?
That will be enough to start with.

Also, has the administrator's guide returned for 7.1.5?
I didn't see it anywhere.

Thanks for any and all help.

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. 
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

Data Protection for Oracle 5.5.2 + 7.1.4 API

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi guys!
I have an issue with one of my Oracle customers. They have several RedHat 5.8 
servers (with Oracle 10) which had TSM 5.5 running, along with TDP for Oracle 
5.5.2.
Since the OS support the new 7.1.4 client, they upgraded the BA and API client 
to 7.1.4. Since that moment they can no longer delete obsolete backup objects. 
In TDPOSYSNC you see the list of obsolete objects, but as soon as you try to 
delete them it returns the following error:

ANS0246E (RC2070) Issue dsmEndTxn and then begin a new transaction session.

The TDP for Oracle 5.5.2 requirement list states "A Tivoli Storage Manager API 
V5.5, or later", so technically it should be compatible...
Does anybody else ran into this issue before? And if so, how did you solve it? 
I know I could have them downgrade the BA and API client again, but then I also 
have to find a way to force a full back up on the BA client...
Thanks for any help in advance!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
Air France/KLM Storage Engineering

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message.

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

Data protection for SAP HANA

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi guys!
In the list of system requirements for Data protection for SAP HANA I see:

SAP HANA support package stack SPS 08 up to SPS 10

SPS11 seems to be out at this moment, does anybody know if it is supported (so 
the requirements page needs updating) or will I have to wait for 7.1.4?
Thanks for any help in advance!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering


For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message.

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

Re: Identifying empty nodes

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi Neil!
You're absolutely right. As soon as all data has been expired the node 
disappears from the occupancy table. I didn't realize that.
Thank you very much for your help!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering

From: Schofield, Neil (Storage & Middleware, Backup & Restore) 
[mailto:neil.schofi...@lloydsbanking.com]
Sent: maandag 29 februari 2016 15:16
To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu
Cc: Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Identifying empty nodes

Eric

It was my understanding that there was only an entry for a file space in the 
occupancy table if it had a non-zero number of objects stored on the server.

If this is true then you probably need something like this:

select node_name from nodes where node_name not in (select node_name from 
occupancy)

Regards
Neil Schofield
Tivoli Storage Manager SME
Backup & Recovery | Storage & Middleware | Central Infrastructure Services | 
Infrastructure & Service Delivery | Group IT
LLOYDS BANKING GROUP


Lloyds Banking Group plc. Registered Office: The Mound, Edinburgh EH1 1YZ. 
Registered in Scotland no. SC95000. Telephone: 0131 225 4555. Lloyds Bank plc. 
Registered Office: 25 Gresham Street, London EC2V 7HN. Registered in England 
and Wales no. 2065. Telephone 0207626 1500. Bank of Scotland plc. Registered 
Office: The Mound, Edinburgh EH1 1YZ. Registered in Scotland no. SC327000. 
Telephone: 03457 801 801. Cheltenham & Gloucester plc. Registered Office: 
Barnett Way, Gloucester GL4 3RL. Registered in England and Wales 2299428. 
Telephone: 0345 603 1637

Lloyds Bank plc, Bank of Scotland plc are authorised by the Prudential 
Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and 
Prudential Regulation Authority.

Cheltenham & Gloucester plc is authorised and regulated by the Financial 
Conduct Authority.

Halifax is a division of Bank of Scotland plc. Cheltenham & Gloucester Savings 
is a division of Lloyds Bank plc.

HBOS plc. Registered Office: The Mound, Edinburgh EH1 1YZ. Registered in 
Scotland no. SC218813.

This e-mail (including any attachments) is private and confidential and may 
contain privileged material. If you have received this e-mail in error, please 
notify the sender and delete it (including any attachments) immediately. You 
must not copy, distribute, disclose or use any of the information in it or any 
attachments. Telephone calls may be monitored or recorded.

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message.

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

Identifying empty nodes

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi guys!
I'm trying to query the occupancy table to identify nodes with no more data 
store, but I can't find the proper syntax. I thought of this one:
select node_name from occupancy where physical_mb is null
But it returns no nodes, while I know for sure there are several of them...
Thanks for any help in advance!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering


For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message.

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

Re: SQL statement

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi Erwann!
As a matter of fact this one requires a little more care. Null can be the 
result of a filespace backup which is interrupted and never restarted (i.e. 
because it has been excluded from the backup) but you will also see null when 
the filespace is only used for archiving. Creating an archive will not set the 
"Last Backup Completion Date/Time" field.
In the first case you can delete the filespace, in the second case you most 
likely don't want to...
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Erwann 
SIMON
Sent: donderdag 28 januari 2016 16:46
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: SQL statement

Hi Eric,

You maybe should add a condition if backup_end is null

--
Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي
Erwann SIMON

- Mail original -
De: "EJ van Loon (ITOPT3) - KLM" <eric-van.l...@klm.com>
À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Envoyé: Jeudi 28 Janvier 2016 16:20:57
Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] SQL statement

Hi Skylar!
This is exactly what I was looking for. Thank you very much for your help!!!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Skylar 
Thompson
Sent: donderdag 28 januari 2016 15:59
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: SQL statement

Hi EJ,

I think this will do the trick:

SELECT -
   f.node_name, -
   f.filespace_name, -
   f.backup_end, -
   CAST(ROUND(o.physical_mb/1024) as int) as "GB Stored" - FROM -
   filespaces f, -
   occupancy o -
WHERE -
   o.node_name=f.node_name -
   AND o.filespace_name=f.filespace_name -
   AND days(f.backup_end)<(days(current_date)-30) - ORDER BY o.physical_mb DESC

On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 02:43:54PM +, Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM wrote:
> Hi guys!
> I'm trying to join the filespaces and occupancy tables in one SQL statement, 
> but I get stuck on the point where I want to calculate with the amount of 
> days...
> I would like to create a list of filespaces (node_name, 
> filespace_name,backup_end) which are not backed up for more than 30 days, 
> along with the amount of data stored for them in GB 
> (cast(round(physical_mb/1024) as int) as "GB Stored"), sorted on size, the 
> largest first.
> Can anybody help me out here? Thank you very much for your help in advance!
> Kind regards,
> Eric van Loon
> AF/KLM Storage Engineering
> 
> For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
> http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential 
> and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
> addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may 
> be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to 
> this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you 
> have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by 
> return e-mail, and delete this message.
>
> Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
> employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
> this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
> Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal 
> Dutch Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with 
> registered number 33014286
> 

--
-- Skylar Thompson (skyl...@u.washington.edu)
-- Genome Sciences Department, System Administrator
-- Foege Building S046, (206)-685-7354
-- University of Washington School of Medicine

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. 
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286


***

Re: SQL statement

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi Skylar!
This is exactly what I was looking for. Thank you very much for your help!!!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Skylar 
Thompson
Sent: donderdag 28 januari 2016 15:59
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: SQL statement

Hi EJ,

I think this will do the trick:

SELECT -
   f.node_name, -
   f.filespace_name, -
   f.backup_end, -
   CAST(ROUND(o.physical_mb/1024) as int) as "GB Stored" - FROM -
   filespaces f, -
   occupancy o -
WHERE -
   o.node_name=f.node_name -
   AND o.filespace_name=f.filespace_name -
   AND days(f.backup_end)<(days(current_date)-30) - ORDER BY o.physical_mb DESC

On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 02:43:54PM +0000, Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM wrote:
> Hi guys!
> I'm trying to join the filespaces and occupancy tables in one SQL statement, 
> but I get stuck on the point where I want to calculate with the amount of 
> days...
> I would like to create a list of filespaces (node_name, 
> filespace_name,backup_end) which are not backed up for more than 30 days, 
> along with the amount of data stored for them in GB 
> (cast(round(physical_mb/1024) as int) as "GB Stored"), sorted on size, the 
> largest first.
> Can anybody help me out here? Thank you very much for your help in advance!
> Kind regards,
> Eric van Loon
> AF/KLM Storage Engineering
> 
> For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
> http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential 
> and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
> addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may 
> be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to 
> this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you 
> have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by 
> return e-mail, and delete this message.
>
> Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
> employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
> this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
> Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal 
> Dutch Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with 
> registered number 33014286
> 

--
-- Skylar Thompson (skyl...@u.washington.edu)
-- Genome Sciences Department, System Administrator
-- Foege Building S046, (206)-685-7354
-- University of Washington School of Medicine

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. 
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

Re: SQL statement

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi Bill!
Nice! Thank you very much for your valuable suggestion!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of 
William Sefranek
Sent: donderdag 28 januari 2016 16:11
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: SQL statement

Eric,

One other line you can add to the select section is:
DAYS(current_timestamp)-DAYS(f.BACKUP_END) AS DAYS_SINCE_BACKUP -

Which will list the number of days since this filespace completed a backup. I 
use that in our query to list old filespaces due for cleanup.

Bill

On 1/28/2016 9:58 AM, Skylar Thompson wrote:
> Hi EJ,
>
> I think this will do the trick:
>
> SELECT -
> f.node_name, -
> f.filespace_name, -
> f.backup_end, -
> CAST(ROUND(o.physical_mb/1024) as int) as "GB Stored" - FROM -
> filespaces f, -
> occupancy o -
> WHERE -
> o.node_name=f.node_name -
> AND o.filespace_name=f.filespace_name -
> AND days(f.backup_end)<(days(current_date)-30) - ORDER BY 
> o.physical_mb DESC
>
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 02:43:54PM +, Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM wrote:
>> Hi guys!
>> I'm trying to join the filespaces and occupancy tables in one SQL statement, 
>> but I get stuck on the point where I want to calculate with the amount of 
>> days...
>> I would like to create a list of filespaces (node_name, 
>> filespace_name,backup_end) which are not backed up for more than 30 days, 
>> along with the amount of data stored for them in GB 
>> (cast(round(physical_mb/1024) as int) as "GB Stored"), sorted on size, the 
>> largest first.
>> Can anybody help me out here? Thank you very much for your help in advance!
>> Kind regards,
>> Eric van Loon
>> AF/KLM Storage Engineering
>> 
>> For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
>> http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential 
>> and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
>> addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may 
>> be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to 
>> this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If 
>> you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately 
>> by return e-mail, and delete this message.
>>
>> Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
>> employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission 
>> of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
>> Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal 
>> Dutch Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with 
>> registered number 33014286
>> 
> --
> -- Skylar Thompson (skyl...@u.washington.edu)
> -- Genome Sciences Department, System Administrator
> -- Foege Building S046, (206)-685-7354
> -- University of Washington School of Medicine
>
>

--
William Sefranek
University of Buffalo
Enterprise Infrastructure Services
(716)645-5116

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. 
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

Re: SQL statement

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi Erwann!
Yes, that's a good tip too. This field is sometimes empty. Thanks!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Erwann 
SIMON
Sent: donderdag 28 januari 2016 16:46
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: SQL statement

Hi Eric,

You maybe should add a condition if backup_end is null

--
Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي
Erwann SIMON

- Mail original -
De: "EJ van Loon (ITOPT3) - KLM" <eric-van.l...@klm.com>
À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Envoyé: Jeudi 28 Janvier 2016 16:20:57
Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] SQL statement

Hi Skylar!
This is exactly what I was looking for. Thank you very much for your help!!!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Skylar 
Thompson
Sent: donderdag 28 januari 2016 15:59
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: SQL statement

Hi EJ,

I think this will do the trick:

SELECT -
   f.node_name, -
   f.filespace_name, -
   f.backup_end, -
   CAST(ROUND(o.physical_mb/1024) as int) as "GB Stored" - FROM -
   filespaces f, -
   occupancy o -
WHERE -
   o.node_name=f.node_name -
   AND o.filespace_name=f.filespace_name -
   AND days(f.backup_end)<(days(current_date)-30) - ORDER BY o.physical_mb DESC

On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 02:43:54PM +0000, Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM wrote:
> Hi guys!
> I'm trying to join the filespaces and occupancy tables in one SQL statement, 
> but I get stuck on the point where I want to calculate with the amount of 
> days...
> I would like to create a list of filespaces (node_name, 
> filespace_name,backup_end) which are not backed up for more than 30 days, 
> along with the amount of data stored for them in GB 
> (cast(round(physical_mb/1024) as int) as "GB Stored"), sorted on size, the 
> largest first.
> Can anybody help me out here? Thank you very much for your help in advance!
> Kind regards,
> Eric van Loon
> AF/KLM Storage Engineering
> 
> For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
> http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential 
> and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
> addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may 
> be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to 
> this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you 
> have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by 
> return e-mail, and delete this message.
>
> Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
> employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
> this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
> Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal 
> Dutch Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with 
> registered number 33014286
> 

--
-- Skylar Thompson (skyl...@u.washington.edu)
-- Genome Sciences Department, System Administrator
-- Foege Building S046, (206)-685-7354
-- University of Washington School of Medicine

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. 
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286



For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action rela

SQL statement

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi guys!
I'm trying to join the filespaces and occupancy tables in one SQL statement, 
but I get stuck on the point where I want to calculate with the amount of 
days...
I would like to create a list of filespaces (node_name, 
filespace_name,backup_end) which are not backed up for more than 30 days, along 
with the amount of data stored for them in GB (cast(round(physical_mb/1024) as 
int) as "GB Stored"), sorted on size, the largest first.
Can anybody help me out here? Thank you very much for your help in advance!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message.

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

Re: Bring back TSM Administrator's Guide

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

One speaker from IBM on the TSM Symposium in Germany last September told us 
that this was a money driven decision. Apparently creating an Admin Guide is a 
very expensive process. He also stated that if we customers still feel this 
manual should return, we should request for it through our IBM contacts.
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Roger 
Deschner
Sent: zaterdag 12 december 2015 2:39
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Bring back TSM Administrator's Guide

A great book is gone. The TSM Administrator's Guide has been obsoleted as of 
v7.1.3. Its priceless collection of how-to information has been scattered to 
the winds, which basically means it is lost. A pity, because this book had been 
a model of complete, well-organized, documentation.

The "Solution Guides" are suitable only for planning a new TSM installation, 
and do not address existing TSM sites. Furthermore, they are much too narrow, 
and do not cover real-world existing TSM customers.
For instance, we use a blended disk and tape solution (D2D2D2T) to create a 
good working compromise between faster restore and storage cost.

Following links to topics in the online Information Center is a haphazard 
process at best, which is never repeatable. There is no Index or Table of 
Contents for the online doc - so you cannot even see what information is there. 
Unless you actually log in, there is no way to even leave a "trail of 
breadcrumbs". Browser bookmarks are useless here, due to IBM's habit of 
changing URLs frequently. This is an extremely inefficient use of my time in 
finding out how to do something in TSM.

Search is not an acceptable replacement for good organization. Search is 
necessary, but it cannot stand alone.

Building a "collection" is not an answer to this requirement. It still lacks a 
coherent Index or Table of Contents, so once my collection gets sizeable, it is 
also unuseable. And with each successive version, I will be required to rebuild 
my collection from scratch all over again.

Despite the fact that it had become fairly large, I humbly ask that the 
Administrator's Guide be published again, as a single PDF, in v7.1.4.

Roger Deschner  University of Illinois at Chicago rog...@uic.edu
==I have not lost my mind -- it is backed up on tape somewhere.=

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. 
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

Re: TDP for SAP issue

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi Martin!
Like I specified in my mail, I do not want to use encryption at all! Encryption 
is killing for deduplication. But it's a bug that the TDP 6.2 client requires 
encryption to be switched on before it's working with the 7.1 API...
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Martin 
Janosik
Sent: woensdag 9 december 2015 16:59
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: TDP for SAP issue

Hello,

by specifying 'ENCRYPTIONType DES56' in dsm.sys stanza you are just overwriting 
default value that is 'ENCRYPTIONType AES128'.
If you want to enable encryption for your customer's backup, you need to 
specify it explicitly - via 'include.encrypt /.../*' in your include/exclude 
list or client option set.
Have a look on
http://www-304.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSGSG7_7.1.0/com.ibm.itsm.client.develop.doc/c_encryp_transp.html


Martin J.

"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU> wrote on 12/09/2015
03:00:36 PM:

> From: "Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM" <eric-van.l...@klm.com>
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Date: 12/09/2015 03:02 PM
> Subject: [ADSM-L] TDP for SAP issue
> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU>
>
> Hi guys!
> One of my customers has an issue on his TDP for SAP clients. They are 
> using TDP for SAP 6.2 and recently we upgraded all TSM clients to 7.1. 
> This caused the TDP clients to fail with the following error:
>
> ANS1463E (RC5801) Unexpected error in cryptography library.
>
> In the API error log:
>
> 11/02/15 14:27:04 ANS1467E ICC routine ICC_SetValue
> (ICC_FIPS_APPROVED_MODE) returned: majRC = 2, minRC = 2, desc = 
> 'Invalid data value: icclib.c:921'.
>
> We do not use any encryption, but as soon as the customer adds the 
> line ENCRYPTIONTYPE DES56 to the dsm.sys, the backup works! So that's 
> what he did, but now I have an issue, because encryption is killing 
> for the deduplication on the backend Data Domain...
> IBM won't help me with this bug because TDP for SAP 6.2 is out of 
> support. The customer does not want to upgrade to TDP for SAP 7.1.3 
> yet because they need to validate this version first.
> I could downgrade the BA/API client to 6.2, but then I have to force a 
> full back up again for the BA client, because restoring 7.1 data with 
> a 6.2 client will most likely not work. So I was hoping to find some 
> work-around. Is it maybe possible to somehow install the 6.2 API next 
> to the 7.1 API? In that case I need to figure out how to make the TDP 
> client use this API version only...
> Thank you very much for any help in advance!
> Kind regards,
> Eric van Loon
> AF/KLM Storage Engineering
>
> 
> For information, services and offers, please visit our web site:
> http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain 
> confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. 
> If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the 
> e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and 
> that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly 
> prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by 
> error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and 
> delete this message.
>
> Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/ or 
> its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete 
> transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for 
> any delay in receipt.
> Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal 
> Dutch Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with 
> registered number 33014286
> 
>

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. 
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

Re: TDP for SAP issue

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi Martin!
You stated " By default AES128 encryption library is attempted". Is that true? 
By default there is no ENCRYPTIONTYPE parameter in the dsm.sys which means no 
encryption at all.
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Martin 
Janosik
Sent: donderdag 10 december 2015 10:46
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: TDP for SAP issue

Hi Eric,

during API initialization some libraries are loaded even if they are not used 
at all - ie ssl libraries can be loaded even though SSL is not used for 
client-server connection. This same applies also to encryption libraries. By 
default AES128 encryption library is attempted.
But some older TDP applications are not happy if it tries to load AES128 
encryption library that was installed as part of newer TSM API. In this case 
you need to fallback to DES56 encryption library (even if you do not intent to 
use them).

Bye

Martin J.

"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU> wrote on 12/10/2015
09:05:05 AM:

> From: "Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM" <eric-van.l...@klm.com>
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Date: 12/10/2015 09:06 AM
> Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TDP for SAP issue Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor 
> Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU>
>
> Hi Martin!
> Like I specified in my mail, I do not want to use encryption at all!
> Encryption is killing for deduplication. But it's a bug that the TDP
> 6.2 client requires encryption to be switched on before it's working 
> with the 7.1 API...
> Kind regards,
> Eric van Loon
> AF/KLM Storage Engineering
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf 
> Of Martin Janosik
> Sent: woensdag 9 december 2015 16:59
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: TDP for SAP issue
>
> Hello,
>
> by specifying 'ENCRYPTIONType DES56' in dsm.sys stanza you are just 
> overwriting default value that is 'ENCRYPTIONType AES128'.
> If you want to enable encryption for your customer's backup, you need 
> to specify it explicitly - via 'include.encrypt /.../*' in your 
> include/exclude list or client option set.
> Have a look on
> http://www-304.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSGSG7_7.1.0/
> com.ibm.itsm.client.develop.doc/c_encryp_transp.html
>
>
> Martin J.
>
> "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU> wrote on 12/09/2015
> 03:00:36 PM:
>
> > From: "Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM" <eric-van.l...@klm.com>
> > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> > Date: 12/09/2015 03:02 PM
> > Subject: [ADSM-L] TDP for SAP issue
> > Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU>
> >
> > Hi guys!
> > One of my customers has an issue on his TDP for SAP clients. They 
> > are using TDP for SAP 6.2 and recently we upgraded all TSM clients to 7.1.
> > This caused the TDP clients to fail with the following error:
> >
> > ANS1463E (RC5801) Unexpected error in cryptography library.
> >
> > In the API error log:
> >
> > 11/02/15 14:27:04 ANS1467E ICC routine ICC_SetValue
> > (ICC_FIPS_APPROVED_MODE) returned: majRC = 2, minRC = 2, desc = 
> > 'Invalid data value: icclib.c:921'.
> >
> > We do not use any encryption, but as soon as the customer adds the 
> > line ENCRYPTIONTYPE DES56 to the dsm.sys, the backup works! So 
> > that's what he did, but now I have an issue, because encryption is 
> > killing for the deduplication on the backend Data Domain...
> > IBM won't help me with this bug because TDP for SAP 6.2 is out of 
> > support. The customer does not want to upgrade to TDP for SAP 7.1.3 
> > yet because they need to validate this version first.
> > I could downgrade the BA/API client to 6.2, but then I have to force 
> > a full back up again for the BA client, because restoring 7.1 data 
> > with a 6.2 client will most likely not work. So I was hoping to find 
> > some work-around. Is it maybe possible to somehow install the 6.2 
> > API next to the 7.1 API? In that case I need to figure out how to 
> > make the TDP client use this API version only...
> > Thank you very much for any help in advance!
> > Kind regards,
> > Eric van Loon
> > AF/KLM Storage Engineering
> >
> > 
> > For information, services and offers, please visit our web site:
> > http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain 
> > confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only.
> > If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the 
> > e-m

Re: TDP for SAP issue

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi Martin!
You have put me on the right track so I dived a little deeper in the encryption 
option in TSM and I discovered that adding this parameter does not enable 
encryption yet, which I was afraid of. You have to add additional parameters 
before the connection is actually encrypted. So I'm relieved!
Thank you very much for your reply!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Martin 
Janosik
Sent: donderdag 10 december 2015 14:32
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: TDP for SAP issue

Hello Eric,

if you start dsmc and look up help for 'encryptiontype' parameter, will find 
exactly this info which state AES128 is default value.

Syntax

   .-AES128-.
>>-ENCRYPTIONType--++--><
   '-DES56--'

Parameters

AES128
   AES 128-bit data encryption. AES 128-bit data encryption provides a
   stronger form of data encryption than DES 56-bit data encryption.
   This is the default.

DES56
   DES 56-bit data encryption.

Hope that helps

Martin J.

"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU> wrote on 12/10/2015
11:28:27 AM:

> From: "Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM" <eric-van.l...@klm.com>
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Date: 12/10/2015 11:29 AM
> Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TDP for SAP issue Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor 
> Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU>
>
> Hi Martin!
> You stated " By default AES128 encryption library is attempted". Is 
> that true? By default there is no ENCRYPTIONTYPE parameter in the 
> dsm.sys which means no encryption at all.
> Kind regards,
> Eric van Loon
> AF/KLM Storage Engineering
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf 
> Of Martin Janosik
> Sent: donderdag 10 december 2015 10:46
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: TDP for SAP issue
>
> Hi Eric,
>
> during API initialization some libraries are loaded even if they are 
> not used at all - ie ssl libraries can be loaded even though SSL is 
> not used for client-server connection. This same applies also to 
> encryption libraries. By default AES128 encryption library is attempted.
> But some older TDP applications are not happy if it tries to load
> AES128 encryption library that was installed as part of newer TSM API. 
> In this case you need to fallback to DES56 encryption library (even if 
> you do not intent to use them).
>
> Bye
>
> Martin J.
>
> "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU> wrote on 12/10/2015
> 09:05:05 AM:
>
> > From: "Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM" <eric-van.l...@klm.com>
> > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> > Date: 12/10/2015 09:06 AM
> > Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TDP for SAP issue Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor 
> > Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU>
> >
> > Hi Martin!
> > Like I specified in my mail, I do not want to use encryption at all!
> > Encryption is killing for deduplication. But it's a bug that the TDP
> > 6.2 client requires encryption to be switched on before it's working 
> > with the 7.1 API...
> > Kind regards,
> > Eric van Loon
> > AF/KLM Storage Engineering
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On 
> > Behalf Of Martin Janosik
> > Sent: woensdag 9 december 2015 16:59
> > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> > Subject: Re: TDP for SAP issue
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > by specifying 'ENCRYPTIONType DES56' in dsm.sys stanza you are just 
> > overwriting default value that is 'ENCRYPTIONType AES128'.
> > If you want to enable encryption for your customer's backup, you 
> > need to specify it explicitly - via 'include.encrypt /.../*' in your 
> > include/exclude list or client option set.
> > Have a look on
> > http://www-304.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSGSG7_7.1.0/
> > com.ibm.itsm.client.develop.doc/c_encryp_transp.html
> >
> >
> > Martin J.
> >
> > "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU> wrote on 12/09/2015
> > 03:00:36 PM:
> >
> > > From: "Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM" <eric-van.l...@klm.com>
> > > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> > > Date: 12/09/2015 03:02 PM
> > > Subject: [ADSM-L] TDP for SAP issue Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor 
> > > Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU>
> > >
> > > Hi guys!
> > > One of my customers has an issue on his TDP for SAP clients. They 
> > > are using TDP for SAP 6.2 and recently we upgraded 

TDP for SAP issue

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi guys!
One of my customers has an issue on his TDP for SAP clients. They are using TDP 
for SAP 6.2 and recently we upgraded all TSM clients to 7.1. This caused the 
TDP clients to fail with the following error:

ANS1463E (RC5801) Unexpected error in cryptography library.

In the API error log:

11/02/15 14:27:04 ANS1467E ICC routine ICC_SetValue (ICC_FIPS_APPROVED_MODE) 
returned: majRC = 2, minRC = 2, desc = 'Invalid data value: icclib.c:921'.

We do not use any encryption, but as soon as the customer adds the line 
ENCRYPTIONTYPE DES56 to the dsm.sys, the backup works! So that's what he did, 
but now I have an issue, because encryption is killing for the deduplication on 
the backend Data Domain...
IBM won't help me with this bug because TDP for SAP 6.2 is out of support. The 
customer does not want to upgrade to TDP for SAP 7.1.3 yet because they need to 
validate this version first.
I could downgrade the BA/API client to 6.2, but then I have to force a full 
back up again for the BA client, because restoring 7.1 data with a 6.2 client 
will most likely not work. So I was hoping to find some work-around. Is it 
maybe possible to somehow install the 6.2 API next to the 7.1 API? In that case 
I need to figure out how to make the TDP client use this API version only...
Thank you very much for any help in advance!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering


For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message.

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

Client-side dedup and (very) large databases

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi all!
I'm currently working on a new TSM/SP server design based on SP 7.1.3.
I have one question about client-side deduplication which we currently do not 
use at all. All our data is deduplicated by the backend hardware (Data Domain). 
The manuals all talk about client-side dedup to be an option for slower LAN 
networks. This indicates that client-side dedup also has an performance 
penalty, which I can understand. But how about (very) large databases? For the 
majority of them about 70 or 80% of the data hasn't changed since the last 
backup. So there is no need to send it to the server.
What is your experience? Will client-side dedup offer you better performance in 
this case or will the dedup penalty be larger than sending everything again 
over the LAN? We are going to connect the server to 10 Gb Ethernet, however 
most clients (also the larger ones) are expected to stay on 1 Gb. for quite a 
while.
Thanks for your help in advance!!!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message.

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

Re: Does a DB2 db ever shrink?

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Maybe the space can only be released to the OS as soon as a DB2 reorg has 
finished for the tables in question, I don't know. In that case it could take 
up to 20 days before the space can be released...
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of 
Rhodes, Richard L.
Sent: woensdag 18 november 2015 13:33
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Does a DB2 db ever shrink?

Thanks!

What is weird is that there doesn't seem to be anything to release.  
TSM is reporting that it has only 12,944 free blocks.  

After deleting 12% of the files (65m) and expiration completing, we were 
expecting the free blocks to be in the millions.  

I don't need the space back, I just want to know that TSM/DB2 will reuse the 
space.  Instead, overall db size just keeps increasing!!!  As you can see 
below, the db keeps growing some number of MB per day. 

(from a q db)
 tsm  FileSysMB UsedMB  FreeMB   date
 tsm8  1126400  700615  425785  201501
 tsm8  1126400  700709  425691  201502
 tsm8  1126400  701544  424856  201503
 tsm8  1126400  701675  424725  201504
 tsm8  1126400  701669  424731  201505
 tsm8  1126400  701669  424731  201506
 tsm8  1126400  701669  424731  201507
 tsm8  1126400  701676  424724  201508 <= 65m files gone
 tsm8  1126400  701678  424722  201509
 tsm8  1126400  701678  424722  201510
 tsm8  1126400  701742  424658  201511
 tsm8  1126400  701804  424596  201512
 tsm8  1126400  701797  424603  201513
 tsm8  1126400  701797  424603  201514
 tsm8  1126400  702151  424249  201515
 tsm8  1126400  702149  424251  201516
 tsm8  1126400  702185  424215  201517
 tsm8  1126400  702248  424152  201518

(from occupancy)
date  #FilesInDbDbGB
 11/01/2015504786214701785
 11/08/2015436723183701676 <= -65m files gone!
 11/17/2015436456172702185





-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Loon, 
EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 11:00 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Does a DB2 db ever shrink?

Hi Rick!
Here is the procedure to release space to the operating system on a 6.3 server:
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21452146#Release_spaceDB297
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of 
Rhodes, Richard L.
Sent: dinsdag 17 november 2015 16:55
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Does a DB2 db ever shrink?

Hi,

On one of our TSM v6.3.5 databases we deleted two nodes which totaled 65m 
files.  After doing this we haven't seen any shrinkage in the database size.

 date  #FilesInDbDbGB
  11/01/2015504786214701785
  11/08/2015436723183701676 <= -65m files gone!
  11/17/2015436456172702185

The free db2 blocks (today) is 12,944.

By deleting the two nodes we dropped the number files by 65m files.  But the 
database itself hasn't changed in size (filesystem size) or free blocks inside 
the db.  The db2 is set to auto-reorg (the default).

Q)  Why wouldn't our db2 db shrink, or, have gobs of free db2 blocks?


Thanks

Rick


-

The information contained in this message is intended only for the personal and 
confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this message 
is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the 
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this 
document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying 
of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication 
in error, please notify us immediately, and delete the original message.

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. 
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 

Re: Does a DB2 db ever shrink?

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi Rick!
Here is the procedure to release space to the operating system on a 6.3 server:
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21452146#Release_spaceDB297
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of 
Rhodes, Richard L.
Sent: dinsdag 17 november 2015 16:55
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Does a DB2 db ever shrink?

Hi,

On one of our TSM v6.3.5 databases we deleted two nodes which totaled 65m 
files.  After doing this we haven't seen any shrinkage in the database size.

 date  #FilesInDbDbGB
  11/01/2015504786214701785
  11/08/2015436723183701676 <= -65m files gone!
  11/17/2015436456172702185

The free db2 blocks (today) is 12,944.

By deleting the two nodes we dropped the number files by 65m files.  But the 
database itself hasn't changed in size (filesystem size) or free blocks inside 
the db.  The db2 is set to auto-reorg (the default).

Q)  Why wouldn't our db2 db shrink, or, have gobs of free db2 blocks?


Thanks

Rick


-

The information contained in this message is intended only for the personal and 
confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this message 
is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the 
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this 
document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying 
of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication 
in error, please notify us immediately, and delete the original message.

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. 
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

Re: TSM Expired Objects List...

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

If I remember correctly quiet=no only tells you which filespace expiration is 
currently processing, not which file...
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of David 
Ehresman
Sent: dinsdag 17 november 2015 15:29
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: TSM Expired Objects List...

Add the "quiet=no" option to the command.  At my level of TSM, 7.1, it is the 
default but if you explicitly request it you should get details.  Also check 
the EXPQUIET option in the server options file.

David

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of 
Kiran.839
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 9:22 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM Expired Objects List...

It is writing only No of Objects not information which object is getting 
deleted.



Regards,
KK

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of David 
Ehresman
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 7:30 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM Expired Objects List...

If you run expiration explicitly (recommended) with the "expire inventory"
command, the details are written to the activity log.

David

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
Kiran.839
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 5:01 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] TSM Expired Objects List...

Hi, Can we get details information of files/objects which are expired from TSM 
when we run Expiration Command.

Regards,
KK.



Disclaimer:
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.dqentertainment.com_
e-2Dmail-5Fdisclaimer.html=AwICAg=SgMrq23dbjbGX6e0ZsSHgEZX6A4IAf1SO3AJ2b
NrHlk=dOGCMY197NTNH1k_wcsrWS3_fxedKW4rpKJ8cHCD2L8=d-qdljdunjlYvJav_ABxO2
VDAtnY7Y3IgdfHUQ0d-6w=fPTXpmI47aCvFBritw6Doaf1a6eZpwuQ9SFwr_W-Hn4=

Disclaimer: 
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.dqentertainment.com_e-2Dmail-5Fdisclaimer.html=AwICAg=SgMrq23dbjbGX6e0ZsSHgEZX6A4IAf1SO3AJ2bNrHlk=dOGCMY197NTNH1k_wcsrWS3_fxedKW4rpKJ8cHCD2L8=T6GbnuSNz2HtfnTJACwf4wWT6zHjyw6Hn--NRv8CVAM=NjvdOJXtfxfwazPIe831ngkjExRtrMJyatonVA4sHLk=
 

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. 
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

Re: Missing support for ISP 7.1.3 for SAP and Oracle 12c

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi guys!
For those of you interested: DP for SAP 7.1.3 is now supporting Oracle 12c.
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Del 
Hoobler
Sent: woensdag 16 september 2015 13:22
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Missing support for ISP 7.1.3 for SAP and Oracle 12c

Hi Markus,

IBM plans to verify DP for SAP with Oracle 12c using the 7.1.3 release that 
released last week.  Once that verification is complete, IBM will update the 
support web site here:
   http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21963460
to indicate Oracle 12c is supported.


Thank you,

Del



"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 09/16/2015
03:06:15 AM:

> From: Markus Engelhard 
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Date: 09/16/2015 03:07 AM
> Subject: Missing support for ISP 7.1.3 for SAP and Oracle 12c Sent by: 
> "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> the combination ISP for Enterprise Ressource Planning seems not to
support
> SAP in combination with Oracle12. Anybody an idea when official 
> support will be added?
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Markus
> 

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. 
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

Re: TSM 7.1.3 and Directory-container storage pools

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi Mike!
On the TSM Symposium in Dresden last month IBM stated that the MOVE DATA option 
to a container pool is a high priority for IBM and it's a candidate for the 
first half of 2016. If it's a priority for you, you should tell your IBM 
contact. If more people find this important, it will get a higher priority.
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Ryder, 
Michael S
Sent: woensdag 7 oktober 2015 16:39
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: TSM 7.1.3 and Directory-container storage pools

Hello Deirdre --

Can you comment on when we might see a better way to migrate existing 
storagepools into directory-container storagepools?  Perhaps an adjustment of 
"move data" or a new command, that doesn't require multiple steps hopping 
through a replication server?  It sounds like this is a needed feature that 
some of us can't get to without this functionality.

Best regards,

Mike , x7942 RMD IT 
Client Services 

On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 5:52 AM, Erwann SIMON  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> As previously said by Deirdre, see the FAQ :
>
> https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/wikis/home?lang=en#!/wiki
> /Tivoli%20Storage%20Manager/page/Directory-container%20storage%20pools
> %20FAQs
>
> --
> Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON
>
> - Mail original -
> De: "Robert Ouzen" 
> À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Envoyé: Mardi 6 Octobre 2015 11:47:12
> Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM 7.1.3 and Directory-container storage pools
>
> Hi to all
>
> Today in my V7.1.3 test environment , tried to move data from old stg 
> fashion (file) to  directory container storage without any success
> Tried with commands:   move nodedata and move data
>
> Here output
>
> tsm: TSMTEST>move nodedata test from=tsmstg1 to=stg_dir ANR3385E MOVE 
> NODEDATA: The operation is not allowed for container storage pools.
>
> tsm: TSMTEST>move data C:\MOUNTPOINTS\STORAGE_1\STG1\0267.BFS
> stg=stg_dir
> ANR3385E MOVE DATA: The operation is not allowed for container storage 
> pools.
>
> I tried too , to do a nextstg
> TSMTEST>upd stg tsmstg1 nextstg=stg_dir
> ANR2399E UPDATE STGPOOL: Storage pool STG_DIR is not a sequential pool.
>
> I of course define stg with stgtype=directory (stg_dir) and after it 
> define stgpooldirectory
>
> Anybody know a way to move old stg to new stg with stgtype=directory  
>
> Regards
>
> Robert
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf 
> Of Stefan Folkerts
> Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 9:49 AM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM 7.1.3 and Directory-container storage pools
>
> I believe you can "move data" data into the container pools, you just 
> can't get the data out with traditional methods at the moment but only 
> via TSM node replication.
> I like the new pool type but they are only suitable to a specific type 
> of setup, the good news is that this setup covers a lot of the new 
> type of TSM deployments we are doing!
>
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 9:24 PM, Sergio O. Fuentes 
> wrote:
>
> > This question is relevant.  How do I move from a file devclass 
> > stgpool to a directory-container pool.  And what's the impact on the 
> > DB if I do
> this?
> >  I already had multi-site configured for our environment with the 
> > tools that exist in versions <7.1.3.  I'm not getting another 200TB 
> > array to move data to new directory-container pools.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > SF
> >
> > On 9/16/15, 10:49 AM, "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager on behalf of Ryder, 
> > Michael S"  > michael_s.ry...@roche.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > >I am very interested in directory-container storage pools.
> > >
> > >But...
> > >
> > >If Migration or Move Data are not options, then how does one 
> > >transition data from existing primary storage pools to a 
> > >directory-container storage pool?
> > >
> > >Mike
> > >
> > >Best regards,
> > >
> > >Mike , x7942 
> > >RMD IT Client Services 
> > >
> > >
> > >On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Rick Adamson 
> > >
> > >wrote:
> > >
> > >> I may be wrong but from reading the 7.1.3 doco new container 
> > >> approach combined with the inline dedup eliminate the need for 
> > >> some of these processes. Also, where traditionally a "copy" 
> > >> storage pool was used they now refer to it as a "protect" storage 
> > >> pool which has the ability to be replicated to another "onsite" or 
> > >> "offsite"
> container storage pool.
> > >>
> > >> Remember that with deduplicated data many of the processes you 
> > >>mentioned  required that the data be rehydrated to be performed. 

Re: 7.1.3 Decomm changes

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi Del!
Thanks for clearing this up!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Del 
Hoobler
Sent: dinsdag 29 september 2015 1:24
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: 7.1.3 Decomm changes

Yes, you can unlock the node for restoring files.

Here is the User's Guide info about that:

http://www-01.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSGSG7_7.1.3/srv.reference/r_cmd_node_decommission.html?lang=en

In the "Attention" note it says:

"The client node is locked, and can be unlocked only to restore files."


Thank you,

Del




"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU> wrote on 09/28/2015
07:12:32 AM:

> From: Del Hoobler/Endicott/IBM@IBMUS
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Date: 09/28/2015 07:30 AM
> Subject: Re: 7.1.3 Decomm changes
> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU>
> 
> All,
> 
> I am pretty sure that UNLOCK NODE can be used in order to access the 
> data.
> 
> I am checking on this to be sure and will post a response once I get 
> 100% verification.
> 
> 
> Del
> 
> 
> 
> "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU> wrote on 09/28/2015
> 06:57:09 AM:
> 
> > From: Remco Post <r.p...@plcs.nl>
> > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> > Date: 09/28/2015 06:57 AM
> > Subject: Re: 7.1.3 Decomm changes
> > Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU>
> > 
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > a decomm with a countdown without options to reverse te decomm seems 
> > quite useless indeed. So either development sort of missed the point 
> > or the communications around this new feature are not 100%…
> > 
> > IBM? Anyone out there?
> > 
> > > Op 28 sep. 2015, om 11:37 heeft Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM  > van.l...@klm.com> het volgende geschreven:
> > > 
> > > Hi Steve!
> > > I agree things are a bit unclear here. On her presentation on
> > YouTube Tricia Jiang explicitly states that the decommission command 
> > locks the node and that it cannot be unlocked (https:// 
> > www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZVyVp0QEIs at 35:16). One of the IBM-ers on 
> > the TSM Symposium in Germany last week however stated that the node 
> > can be unlocked if necessary... Maybe someone from development on 
> > this list can clarify this?
> > > Kind regards,
> > > Eric van Loon
> > > AF/KLM Storage Engineering
> > > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On
> > Behalf Of Steven Harris
> > > Sent: maandag 28 september 2015 3:10
> > > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> > > Subject: 7.1.3 Decomm changes
> > > 
> > > Hi All
> > > 
> > > Kudos to the TSM developers for the new decomm facilities in 7.1.
> > 3.  I put up an RFE once myself for something similar.
> > > 
> > > As I read it, the decommissioned data is locked up in such a way
> > that it can't be got at. Obviously I'm missing something as if it 
> > can't be accessed, there is no point in keeping the data and we 
> > might as well just delete.
> > > 
> > > Can someone walk me through a restore scenario?
> > > 
> > > Thanks
> > > 
> > > Steve
> > > 
> > > Steven Harris
> > > TSM SME
> > > Canberra, Australia
> > > 
> > > For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
> > http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain 
> > confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee 
> > only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of 
> > the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or 
> > distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or 
> > attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
> > received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately 
> > by return e-mail, and delete this message.
> > > 
> > > Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries
> > and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or 
> > incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor 
> > responsible for any delay in receipt.
> > > Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal
> > Dutch Airlines) is registered in Amste

Re: 7.1.3 Decomm changes

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi Steve!
I agree things are a bit unclear here. On her presentation on YouTube Tricia 
Jiang explicitly states that the decommission command locks the node and that 
it cannot be unlocked (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZVyVp0QEIs at 35:16). 
One of the IBM-ers on the TSM Symposium in Germany last week however stated 
that the node can be unlocked if necessary... Maybe someone from development on 
this list can clarify this?
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Steven 
Harris
Sent: maandag 28 september 2015 3:10
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: 7.1.3 Decomm changes

Hi All

Kudos to the TSM developers for the new decomm facilities in 7.1.3.  I put up 
an RFE once myself for something similar.

As I read it, the decommissioned data is locked up in such a way that it can't 
be got at. Obviously I'm missing something as if it can't be accessed, there is 
no point in keeping the data and we might as well just delete.

Can someone walk me through a restore scenario?

Thanks

Steve

Steven Harris
TSM SME
Canberra, Australia

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. 
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

Re: nfs mounted tsm storage becoming unavailable

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi Shawn!
Sparse files are created while the actual storage is allocated when needed. So 
the actuals disk space is allocated at the moment you are filling your diskpool 
volumes for the first time. If this is true, you're diskpool files will be 
heavily fragmented...
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Shawn 
Drew
Sent: woensdag 9 september 2015 17:15
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: nfs mounted tsm storage becoming unavailable

It depends on the file system the volume is created on. Ext4 and JFS support 
sparse file creation and TSM takes advantage of it. NFS does not. Search the 
admin guide for "preallocated" for info.

On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM 
<eric-van.l...@klm.com> wrote:
Smarter way of formatting? Either it fills the files with zero's or with a 
certain text string like in 5.5, formatting takes time. Allocating a 100 Gb 
files currently takes a few seconds, so it's impossible that TSM physically 
formats a file.
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering

-Original Message-
 From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Remco 
Post
Sent: woensdag 9 september 2015 14:17
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: nfs mounted tsm storage becoming unavailable

Op 9 sep. 2015, om 09:11 heeft "Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM"
<eric-van.l...@klm.com> het volgende geschreven:

 > Hi Rick!
 > Formatting the whole volume was the case in the TSM 5.5 era, but not anymore.

not true, but TSM does attempt smarter ways of formatting, so it seems faster  
from your perspective.

What is important is that TSM uses a particular kind of file locking, something 
that doesn't work for every combination of NFS client and server. See:
https://www-304.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21470193

 > Formatting a diskpool or filepool volume took ages back then because it was 
 > filed with a text string (my name backwards :-), but with version 6 this has 
 > changed and it just pre-allocates the requested space without formatting.
Creating a volume is now a matter of seconds, no matter how large it is.
 > Kind regards,
 > Eric van Loon
 > AF/KLM Storage Engineering
 >
 > -Original Message-
 > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of 
 > Rhodes, Richard L.
 > Sent: dinsdag 8 september 2015 18:49
 > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 > Subject: Re: nfs mounted tsm storage becoming unavailable  >  > It sounds 
 > like you are pre-defining the file vols on the NFS share.
 > If you pre-define vols I believe TSM writes the entire vol to initialize it.
That would be a very heavy write load. It sounds like maybe the NFS server is 
overloaded and maybe causing I/O errors to the other TSM's.
 >
 > Are you seeing ANR errors in the actlog of any of the TSM servers when this 
 > problem occurs?
 >
 > I'd check the network stats for your TSM server and NFS server.
 > Possibly getting lan errors under heavy load is causing problems.
 >
 > Are your NFS shares mounted hard? I believe they should be.
 >
 > Run around - don't pre-define vols, let TSM to create scratch vols as needed.
 > That's what we do for our NFS DataDomain shares.
 >
 > Just some thoughts!
 >
 > Rick
 >
 >
 >
 > -Original Message-
 > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of 
 > Lee, Gary  > Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 10:38 AM  > To: 
 > ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU  > Subject: nfs mounted tsm storage becoming 
 > unavailable  >  > We are trying to troubleshoot a problem with our tsm disk 
 > storage.
 >
 > Tsm server 6.3.4 running on RHEL 6.5.
 > Our storage is a set of subdirectories on a file system mounted via nfs
v3 to
all three of our tsm servers.
 >
 > All goes fine until an attempt is made to define one or more volumes to a 
 > storage pool.
 > At that time, if other tsm servers are writing to the storage, those volumes 
 > will become red-only when the volume define is in process.
 >
 > Other operations, such as reclamation, and normal writing do not cause 
 > problems.
 >
 > Our storage provider, (nexenta) is asking what tsm does when creating a 
 > storage volume.
 > So, I am coming to the list for information. Just what does tsm do under the 
 > covers when defining a storage volume?
 >
 > Thanks for any help.
 >
 >
 > -The information contained in this 
 > message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the
recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, 
you are hereby notified that you ha

Re: nfs mounted tsm storage becoming unavailable

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi Rick!
Formatting the whole volume was the case in the TSM 5.5 era, but not anymore. 
Formatting a diskpool or filepool volume took ages back then because it was 
filed with a text string (my name backwards :-), but with version 6 this has 
changed and it just pre-allocates the requested space without formatting. 
Creating a volume is now a matter of seconds, no matter how large it is.
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of 
Rhodes, Richard L.
Sent: dinsdag 8 september 2015 18:49
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: nfs mounted tsm storage becoming unavailable

It sounds like you are pre-defining the file vols on the NFS share.
If you pre-define vols I believe TSM writes the entire vol to initialize it.  
That would be a very heavy write load.  It sounds like maybe the NFS server is 
overloaded and maybe causing I/O errors to the other TSM's.  

Are you seeing ANR errors in the actlog of any of the TSM servers when this 
problem occurs?

I'd check the network stats for your TSM server and NFS server.  
Possibly getting  lan errors under heavy load is causing problems.

Are your NFS shares mounted hard?  I believe they should be.

Run around - don't pre-define vols, let TSM to create scratch vols as needed.  
That's what we do for our NFS DataDomain shares.

Just some thoughts!

Rick



-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Lee, 
Gary
Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 10:38 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: nfs mounted tsm storage becoming unavailable

We are trying to troubleshoot a problem with our tsm disk storage.

Tsm server 6.3.4 running on RHEL 6.5.
Our storage is a set of subdirectories on a file system mounted via nfs v3 to 
all three of our tsm servers.

All goes fine until an attempt is made to define one or more volumes to a 
storage pool.
At that time, if other tsm servers are writing to the storage, those volumes 
will become red-only when the volume define is in process.

Other operations, such as reclamation, and normal writing do not cause problems.

Our storage provider, (nexenta) is asking what tsm does when creating a storage 
volume.
So, I am coming to the list for information.  Just what does tsm do under the 
covers when defining a storage volume?

Thanks for any help.


-The information contained in this 
message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the 
recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, 
you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that 
any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us 
immediately, and delete the original message.

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. 
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

Re: nfs mounted tsm storage becoming unavailable

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Smarter way of formatting? Either it fills the files with zero's or with a 
certain text string like in 5.5, formatting takes time. Allocating a 100 Gb 
files currently takes a few seconds, so it's impossible that TSM physically 
formats a file.
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Remco 
Post
Sent: woensdag 9 september 2015 14:17
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: nfs mounted tsm storage becoming unavailable

Op 9 sep. 2015, om 09:11 heeft "Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM" 
<eric-van.l...@klm.com> het volgende geschreven:

> Hi Rick!
> Formatting the whole volume was the case in the TSM 5.5 era, but not anymore.

not true, but TSM does attempt smarter ways of formatting, so it seems faster 
from your perspective.

What is important is that TSM uses a particular kind of file locking, something 
that doesn't work for every combination of NFS client and server. See: 
https://www-304.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21470193

> Formatting a diskpool or filepool volume took ages back then because it was 
> filed with a text string (my name backwards :-), but with version 6 this has 
> changed and it just pre-allocates the requested space without formatting. 
> Creating a volume is now a matter of seconds, no matter how large it is.
> Kind regards,
> Eric van Loon
> AF/KLM Storage Engineering
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of 
> Rhodes, Richard L.
> Sent: dinsdag 8 september 2015 18:49
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: nfs mounted tsm storage becoming unavailable
> 
> It sounds like you are pre-defining the file vols on the NFS share.
> If you pre-define vols I believe TSM writes the entire vol to initialize it.  
> That would be a very heavy write load.  It sounds like maybe the NFS server 
> is overloaded and maybe causing I/O errors to the other TSM's.  
> 
> Are you seeing ANR errors in the actlog of any of the TSM servers when this 
> problem occurs?
> 
> I'd check the network stats for your TSM server and NFS server.  
> Possibly getting  lan errors under heavy load is causing problems.
> 
> Are your NFS shares mounted hard?  I believe they should be.
> 
> Run around - don't pre-define vols, let TSM to create scratch vols as needed. 
>  
> That's what we do for our NFS DataDomain shares.
> 
> Just some thoughts!
> 
> Rick
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Lee, 
> Gary
> Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 10:38 AM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: nfs mounted tsm storage becoming unavailable
> 
> We are trying to troubleshoot a problem with our tsm disk storage.
> 
> Tsm server 6.3.4 running on RHEL 6.5.
> Our storage is a set of subdirectories on a file system mounted via nfs v3 to 
> all three of our tsm servers.
> 
> All goes fine until an attempt is made to define one or more volumes to a 
> storage pool.
> At that time, if other tsm servers are writing to the storage, those volumes 
> will become red-only when the volume define is in process.
> 
> Other operations, such as reclamation, and normal writing do not cause 
> problems.
> 
> Our storage provider, (nexenta) is asking what tsm does when creating a 
> storage volume.
> So, I am coming to the list for information.  Just what does tsm do under the 
> covers when defining a storage volume?
> 
> Thanks for any help.
> 
> 
> -The information contained in this 
> message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the 
> recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
> recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended 
> recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in 
> error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this 
> message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in 
> error, please notify us immediately, and delete the original message.
> 
> For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
> http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential 
> and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
> addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may 
> be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to 
> this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you 
> have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately 

Re: Data Protection for IBM Domino

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi Frank!
Thank you very much for your correction, I will advise my customer to use 
selectives with once a week an incremental.
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Frank 
Ramke
Sent: dinsdag 25 augustus 2015 16:50
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Data Protection for IBM Domino

Eric

After further study with circular logging, it turns out I didn't give good 
advise.

With circular logging, incremental backup will not backup the database unless 
the database's DBIID changes (a rare occurrence).  Selective backups to backup 
the changes along with occasional incremental, to inactivate deleted databases 
is the right way to go.


ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 08/21/2015
10:30:05 AM:

 From: Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM eric-van.l...@klm.com
 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Date: 08/21/2015 10:33 AM
 Subject: Re: Data Protection for IBM Domino Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor 
 Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU

 Hi Frank!
 I indeed read that part of the manual, but it's all about transaction 
 logs and the 'logged databases' whatever that means.
 Nothing about what your backup strategy should be when circular 
 logging is used.
 So thank you very much for your reply, it's really appreciated! I will 
 advise my customer to switch to incremental backups.
 Kind regards,
 Eric van Loon
 AF/KLM Storage Engineering

 -Original Message-
 From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf 
 Of Frank Ramke
 Sent: vrijdag 21 augustus 2015 15:43
 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Subject: Re: Data Protection for IBM Domino

 Eric,

 Just noticed your question was about circular logging

 The customer uses circular logging only for all Domino instances.

 With circular logging, we cannot backup transaction logs!

 Anyway  YES, Daily incrementals instead of Daily selectives with 
 occasional incremental is fine.  New and changed nsf files will be 
 backed up, deleted ones will be inactivated...


==



 This topic is found under Backup Strategies in the book.
 http://www-01.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSGSG7_7.1.0/
 com.ibm.itsm.mail.dom.win.doc/concept_domcbup3.html

 Sample Strategies
 ...

 Full backup plus transaction log archives
It is often not practical to back up entire databases with each 
 regular backup for large Domino installations. Archival logging 
 captures changes to all logged databases in the archived transaction 
 log files. Full database backups are run less frequently, reducing 
 burdens on network and storage resources. To implement this strategy:
 - Run regular log archives by running the archivelog command. The log 
 file does not fill and it captures changes to logged databases.
 - Run regular Incremental backups, which back up logged databases with 
 unchanged DBIIDs.
 - Run occasional Selective backups of all logged databases. The number 
 of transaction log files to be processed during a restore is
reduced.
 - Issue the inarchivelog command (following Selective backups) to 
 allow nonessential transaction log files to expire.

 The archivelog command captures changes to all logged databases in 
 between full backups of selected databases. To restore a database to 
 its most recent state, restore the most recent database backup and 
 specify /applylogs. All the necessary archived transaction log files 
 are restored so that updates for the database can be applied



 From:   Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM eric-van.l...@klm.com
 To:   ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Date:   08/21/2015 09:00 AM
 Subject:   Data Protection for IBM Domino
 Sent by:   ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU



 Hi guys!
 One of my customers uses Data Protection for IBM Domino for a few 
 years now. All mail instances are backed up daily with the domdsmc 
 selective command. I recently discovered that old deleted databases 
 were never removed from TSM, which seems to be caused by the fact that 
 we do selectives only. Only an occasional domdsmc incremental seems to 
 remove them.
 So I recommended the customer to implement an incremental backup once 
 a week. He now asks me What if I run daily incrementals instead of 
 the selectives? I don't know if that will work, nor can I find the 
 answer in the manuals...
 The customer uses circular logging only for all Domino instances.
 Thank you very much for your help in advance!
 Kind regards,
 Eric van Loon
 AF/KLM Storage Engineering
 
 For information, services and offers, please visit our web site:
 http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain 
 confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. 
 If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the 
 e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied

Re: Data Protection for IBM Domino

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi Frank!
From the TDP manual:

Domdsmc incremental performs the following functions:

Backs up new databases since the last backup (or newly included ones)
Backs up any non-logged databases that changed since the last backup (based 
on modification dates of both data and metadata)
Backs up any logged databases with a DBIID that changed (if archival 
logging is in effect)
Inactivates any active database backups on the Tivoli® Storage Manager 
server that are excluded from backup or no longer exist on the Domino® server

So a change of the modification data should trigger an incremental backup too, 
right?
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Frank 
Ramke
Sent: dinsdag 25 augustus 2015 16:50
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Data Protection for IBM Domino

Eric

After further study with circular logging, it turns out I didn't give good 
advise.

With circular logging, incremental backup will not backup the database unless 
the database's DBIID changes (a rare occurrence).  Selective backups to backup 
the changes along with occasional incremental, to inactivate deleted databases 
is the right way to go.


ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 08/21/2015
10:30:05 AM:

 From: Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM eric-van.l...@klm.com
 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Date: 08/21/2015 10:33 AM
 Subject: Re: Data Protection for IBM Domino Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor 
 Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU

 Hi Frank!
 I indeed read that part of the manual, but it's all about transaction 
 logs and the 'logged databases' whatever that means.
 Nothing about what your backup strategy should be when circular 
 logging is used.
 So thank you very much for your reply, it's really appreciated! I will 
 advise my customer to switch to incremental backups.
 Kind regards,
 Eric van Loon
 AF/KLM Storage Engineering

 -Original Message-
 From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf 
 Of Frank Ramke
 Sent: vrijdag 21 augustus 2015 15:43
 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Subject: Re: Data Protection for IBM Domino

 Eric,

 Just noticed your question was about circular logging

 The customer uses circular logging only for all Domino instances.

 With circular logging, we cannot backup transaction logs!

 Anyway  YES, Daily incrementals instead of Daily selectives with 
 occasional incremental is fine.  New and changed nsf files will be 
 backed up, deleted ones will be inactivated...


==



 This topic is found under Backup Strategies in the book.
 http://www-01.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSGSG7_7.1.0/
 com.ibm.itsm.mail.dom.win.doc/concept_domcbup3.html

 Sample Strategies
 ...

 Full backup plus transaction log archives
It is often not practical to back up entire databases with each 
 regular backup for large Domino installations. Archival logging 
 captures changes to all logged databases in the archived transaction 
 log files. Full database backups are run less frequently, reducing 
 burdens on network and storage resources. To implement this strategy:
 - Run regular log archives by running the archivelog command. The log 
 file does not fill and it captures changes to logged databases.
 - Run regular Incremental backups, which back up logged databases with 
 unchanged DBIIDs.
 - Run occasional Selective backups of all logged databases. The number 
 of transaction log files to be processed during a restore is
reduced.
 - Issue the inarchivelog command (following Selective backups) to 
 allow nonessential transaction log files to expire.

 The archivelog command captures changes to all logged databases in 
 between full backups of selected databases. To restore a database to 
 its most recent state, restore the most recent database backup and 
 specify /applylogs. All the necessary archived transaction log files 
 are restored so that updates for the database can be applied



 From:   Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM eric-van.l...@klm.com
 To:   ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Date:   08/21/2015 09:00 AM
 Subject:   Data Protection for IBM Domino
 Sent by:   ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU



 Hi guys!
 One of my customers uses Data Protection for IBM Domino for a few 
 years now. All mail instances are backed up daily with the domdsmc 
 selective command. I recently discovered that old deleted databases 
 were never removed from TSM, which seems to be caused by the fact that 
 we do selectives only. Only an occasional domdsmc incremental seems to 
 remove them.
 So I recommended the customer to implement an incremental backup once 
 a week. He now asks me What if I run daily incrementals instead of 
 the selectives? I don't know if that will work, nor can I find the 
 answer in the manuals...
 The customer uses circular logging only for all Domino instances

Re: going to all random disk pool for tsm for ve

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

There is no reclamation on a diskpool. Over time the deletion of (very) small 
data blocks will make it heavily fragmented which will definitely impact you 
performance...
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Stefan 
Folkerts
Sent: maandag 24 augustus 2015 12:07
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: going to all random disk pool for tsm for ve

I believe a fileclass storagepool is better suited for this kind of permanent 
storage on disk.
A diskpool should be used for things such as disk between the backup client and 
tape for temporary random I/O storage that can handle an unlimited amount of 
sessions.
A fileclass storagepool is better suited for long term storage.
I create a diskpool for VE metadata when using dedup on the filepool and use 
fileclass storagepools for permanent storage on disk with or without 
deduplication.

Are you planning on using deduplication on disk?


On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 10:12 PM, David Ehresman  
david.ehres...@louisville.edu wrote:

 Gary,

 TSMVE 7.1.2 makes file level restores a reality.  You may want to work 
 with them a bit before deciding if you want to go to all random disk.

 David

 -Original Message-
 From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf 
 Of Lee, Gary
 Sent: Friday, August 21, 2015 3:31 PM
 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Subject: [ADSM-L] going to all random disk pool for tsm for ve

 Hoping to get upgraded to tsm server 7.1.x within the next month.
 At that time, we are considering changing our storage strategy to all 
 random disk pool.

 This because we cannot do a file level restore from a vmware backup 
 from sequencial media, (be it tape or disk).

 Has anyone done this, or is there a better way?

 Looking for guideance and others' experience.


For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. 
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

Re: Data Protection for IBM Domino

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi Frank!
I indeed read that part of the manual, but it's all about transaction logs and 
the 'logged databases' whatever that means. Nothing about what your backup 
strategy should be when circular logging is used.
So thank you very much for your reply, it's really appreciated! I will advise 
my customer to switch to incremental backups.
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Frank 
Ramke
Sent: vrijdag 21 augustus 2015 15:43
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Data Protection for IBM Domino

Eric,

Just noticed your question was about circular logging

The customer uses circular logging only for all Domino instances.

With circular logging, we cannot backup transaction logs!

Anyway  YES, Daily incrementals instead of Daily selectives with occasional 
incremental is fine.  New and changed nsf files will be backed up, deleted ones 
will be inactivated...

==


This topic is found under Backup Strategies in the book.
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSGSG7_7.1.0/com.ibm.itsm.mail.dom.win.doc/concept_domcbup3.html

Sample Strategies
...

Full backup plus transaction log archives
   It is often not practical to back up entire databases with each regular 
backup for large Domino installations. Archival logging captures changes to all 
logged databases in the archived transaction log files. Full database backups 
are run less frequently, reducing burdens on network and storage resources. To 
implement this strategy:
- Run regular log archives by running the archivelog command. The log file does 
not fill and it captures changes to logged databases.
- Run regular Incremental backups, which back up logged databases with 
unchanged DBIIDs.
- Run occasional Selective backups of all logged databases. The number of 
transaction log files to be processed during a restore is reduced.
- Issue the inarchivelog command (following Selective backups) to allow 
nonessential transaction log files to expire.

The archivelog command captures changes to all logged databases in between full 
backups of selected databases. To restore a database to its most recent state, 
restore the most recent database backup and specify /applylogs. All the 
necessary archived transaction log files are restored so that updates for the 
database can be applied



From:   Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM eric-van.l...@klm.com
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Date:   08/21/2015 09:00 AM
Subject:Data Protection for IBM Domino
Sent by:ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU



Hi guys!
One of my customers uses Data Protection for IBM Domino for a few years now. 
All mail instances are backed up daily with the domdsmc selective command. I 
recently discovered that old deleted databases were never removed from TSM, 
which seems to be caused by the fact that we do selectives only. Only an 
occasional domdsmc incremental seems to remove them.
So I recommended the customer to implement an incremental backup once a week. 
He now asks me What if I run daily incrementals instead of the selectives? I 
don't know if that will work, nor can I find the answer in the manuals...
The customer uses circular logging only for all Domino instances.
Thank you very much for your help in advance!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site:
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful.
If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately 
by return e-mail, and delete this message.

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286



For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related

Data Protection for IBM Domino

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi guys!
One of my customers uses Data Protection for IBM Domino for a few years now. 
All mail instances are backed up daily with the domdsmc selective command. I 
recently discovered that old deleted databases were never removed from TSM, 
which seems to be caused by the fact that we do selectives only. Only an 
occasional domdsmc incremental seems to remove them.
So I recommended the customer to implement an incremental backup once a week. 
He now asks me What if I run daily incrementals instead of the selectives? I 
don't know if that will work, nor can I find the answer in the manuals...
The customer uses circular logging only for all Domino instances.
Thank you very much for your help in advance!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message.

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

Re: Enhancement request

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Never mind, I wasn't looking correctly, TSM is part of the IBM RFE Community. I 
have created request 75293 for my enhancement, If you think it's a useful 
enhancement to have the server name added to the title of a Windows dsmadmc 
window, please support my request through 
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute?use_case=viewRfeCR_ID=75293
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering

From: Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM
Sent: dinsdag 11 augustus 2015 14:42
To: ADSM-L
Subject: Enhancement request

Hi guys!
I would like to submit an enhancement request for the TSM Windows Admin 
Commandline interface (add the connected servername to the title bar), but I 
can't find how to submit one. IBM has a site called IBM RFE Community for these 
requests, but TSM is not listed on that site...
Thanks for any help in advance!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering


For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message.

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

Enhancement request

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi guys!
I would like to submit an enhancement request for the TSM Windows Admin 
Commandline interface (add the connected servername to the title bar), but I 
can't find how to submit one. IBM has a site called IBM RFE Community for these 
requests, but TSM is not listed on that site...
Thanks for any help in advance!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering


For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message.

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

Re: Enhancement request

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi Remco!
Is anyone using OC then? ;-)
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Remco 
Post
Sent: dinsdag 11 augustus 2015 15:15
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Enhancement request

The server name is quite visibly shown in the CLI part of OC. I’d rather see 
the OC be enhanced than a developer spend time on the CLI.

 Op 11 aug. 2015, om 14:54 heeft Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM 
 eric-van.l...@klm.com het volgende geschreven:
 
 Never mind, I wasn't looking correctly, TSM is part of the IBM RFE Community. 
 I have created request 75293 for my enhancement, If you think it's a useful 
 enhancement to have the server name added to the title of a Windows dsmadmc 
 window, please support my request through 
 http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute?use_case=viewRfeCR_ID=75293
 Kind regards,
 Eric van Loon
 AF/KLM Storage Engineering
 
 From: Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM
 Sent: dinsdag 11 augustus 2015 14:42
 To: ADSM-L
 Subject: Enhancement request
 
 Hi guys!
 I would like to submit an enhancement request for the TSM Windows Admin 
 Commandline interface (add the connected servername to the title bar), but I 
 can't find how to submit one. IBM has a site called IBM RFE Community for 
 these requests, but TSM is not listed on that site...
 Thanks for any help in advance!
 Kind regards,
 Eric van Loon
 AF/KLM Storage Engineering
 
 
 For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
 http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential 
 and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
 addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may 
 be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to 
 this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you 
 have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by 
 return e-mail, and delete this message.
 
 Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
 employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
 this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
 Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
 Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered 
 number 33014286
 

-- 

 Met vriendelijke groeten/Kind Regards,

Remco Post
r.p...@plcs.nl
+31 6 248 21 622

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. 
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

Re: Journal Based Backup on RHEL5

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi guys!
Just to let you know and so it's documented in the ADSM-L archives: I received 
an answer from IBM Support that there is no RHEL5 package for JBB out of the 
box. If you want it you have to compile it yourself...
I still find it very strange that IBM creates a distribution for RHEL 5 and 6 
with part of the RHEL5 packages missing. It's even more strange: the JBB 
package for RHEL 5.9 was part of the 7.1.0.0 and 7.1.1.0 release and is no 
longer part of 7.1.2.0! The fact that the RHEL5.9 package is mentioned in the 
manual is treated as a typo...
All in all a little bit disappointing.
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering

-Original Message-

 Hi TSM-ers!
 I'm trying to install the 7.1 TSM client on one of our RHEL5 servers but I 
 receive an error during the dependency check for one of the rpm's:
 rpmlib(FileDigests) is needed by TIVsm-filepath-7.1.2-0.x86_64
 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) is needed by TIVsm-filepath-7.1.2-0.x86_64 This 
 message seems to indicate that the rpm was created on a different (read 
 higher) RedHat version. Also the Linux client tar file contains three 
 versions of the filepath rpm:

 TIVsm-filepath-7.1.2-0-rhel7.x86_64.rpm (for RedHat 7) 
 TIVsm-filepath-7.1.2-0-sles11sp2.x86_64.rpm (for Suse Linux Enterprise 
 Server 11) TIVsm-filepath-7.1.2-0-rhel64.x86_64.rpm (for RedHat 6.4)

 This would indicate that JBB is only available for RHEL6.4 while it's bundled 
 in a release which support RHEL5 and 6. I also cannot find any document on 
 the IBM website which states that RHEL5 is not supported or that 6.4 is the 
 minimum release for JBB...
 Thanks for any help in advance and have a nice weekend!
 Kind regards,
 Eric van Loon
 AF/KLM Storage Engineering

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. 
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

Re: Journal Based Backup on RHEL5

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi Michael!
From the chapter you are referring to:

If none of these packages matches your Linux version, you must compile Filepath 
from source code. The Linux Filepath kernel module is licensed pursuant to the 
terms of the GNU General Public License (GPL). To request the Linux Filepath 
source code, send an email to tsmos...@us.ibm.com.

However, IBM states that the TSM 7.1 client is compatible with RHEL 5, 6 and 7, 
so I expect them to deliver the filesets for all versions, not only 6 and 7. I 
will open a PMR for it.
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of 
Michael Prix
Sent: vrijdag 17 juli 2015 18:28
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Journal Based Backup on RHEL5

Eric,

  as per documentation:
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSGSG7_7.1.0/com.ibm.itsm.client.doc/t_inst_linuxx86client.html

build you own TIVsm-filepath-7.1.2-0-*.rpm by following the instructions given 
under point 6.

--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards

Michael Prix

Am 07/17/2015 um 03:57 PM schrieb Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM:
 Hi TSM-ers!
 I'm trying to install the 7.1 TSM client on one of our RHEL5 servers but I 
 receive an error during the dependency check for one of the rpm's:
 rpmlib(FileDigests) is needed by TIVsm-filepath-7.1.2-0.x86_64
 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) is needed by TIVsm-filepath-7.1.2-0.x86_64 This 
 message seems to indicate that the rpm was created on a different (read 
 higher) RedHat version. Also the Linux client tar file contains three 
 versions of the filepath rpm:

 TIVsm-filepath-7.1.2-0-rhel7.x86_64.rpm (for RedHat 7) 
 TIVsm-filepath-7.1.2-0-sles11sp2.x86_64.rpm (for Suse Linux Enterprise 
 Server 11) TIVsm-filepath-7.1.2-0-rhel64.x86_64.rpm (for RedHat 6.4)

 This would indicate that JBB is only available for RHEL6.4 while it's bundled 
 in a release which support RHEL5 and 6. I also cannot find any document on 
 the IBM website which states that RHEL5 is not supported or that 6.4 is the 
 minimum release for JBB...
 Thanks for any help in advance and have a nice weekend!
 Kind regards,
 Eric van Loon
 AF/KLM Storage Engineering

 
 For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
 http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential 
 and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
 addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may 
 be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to 
 this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you 
 have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by 
 return e-mail, and delete this message.

 Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
 employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
 this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
 Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal 
 Dutch Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with 
 registered number 33014286
 

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. 
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

Drive serial

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi guys!
I haven't had much experience with physical tape drives (we are using DD VTL's 
only) but recently I installed a few stand-alone IBM LTO5 drives to be able to 
externalize TSM data on request. I need the serial numbers of the drives for 
administrational purposes. I know TSM reports a serial number in the drive 
definition, is this identical to the physical serial number on the sticker on 
the back of the drive?
Thanks for any reply in advance!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message.

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

Re: Drive serial

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Great, thanks again for your help guys!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Zoltan 
Forray
Sent: maandag 20 juli 2015 14:48
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Drive serial

The info is the same.

From my TSM server (FYI the drive names in TSM is the same as the last-6 digits 
of the drive serial number:

8:43:30 AM   SUN : QUERY DRIVE TS3500-COPY 78A073E f=d
Library Name: TS3500-COPY
  Drive Name: 78A073E
 Device Type: 3592
 On-Line: Yes
Read Formats:
3592-3C,3592-3,3592-2C,3592-2,35-
   92C,3592
   Write Formats: 3592-3C,3592-3,3592-2C,3592-2
 Element: 262
 Drive State: LOADED
 Volume Name: 088457
Allocated to: WIND
 WWN: 5005076044093B07
*   Serial Number: 078A073E*
  Last Update by (administrator): ZFORRAY
   Last Update Date/Time: 04/04/2015 14:54:43 Cleaning 
Frequency (Gigabytes/ASNEEDED/NONE): NONE

Compares to the contents of /proc/scsi/IBMtape on my Linux TSM server:

[root@sun ~]# cat /proc/scsi/IBMtape
lin_tape version: 2.9.4
lin_tape major number: 250
Attached Tape Devices:
Number  model   SNHBA SCSIFO
Path
0   03592E06078A4011  qla2xxx 5:0:0:0 NA
*1   03592E06078A073E  qla2xxx 5:0:1:0 NA*
2   03592E06078A70E9  qla2xxx 5:0:2:0 NA
3   03592E0607876473  qla2xxx 5:0:3:0 NA
4   03592E0607857540  qla2xxx 5:0:4:0 NA
5   03592E0607876475  qla2xxx 5:0:5:0 NA
6   03592E0607857392  qla2xxx 5:0:6:0 NA
7   03592E0607857569  qla2xxx 5:0:7:0 NA
8   03592E06078A08AB  qla2xxx 5:0:8:0 NA
9   03592E06078A401C  qla2xxx 5:0:9:0 NA
10  03592E06078A08A1  qla2xxx 5:0:10:0NA
11  03592E0607868704  qla2xxx 5:0:11:0NA
12  03592E06078A70E8  qla2xxx 5:0:12:0NA
13  03592E0607876472  qla2xxx 5:0:13:0NA
14  03592E06078A3C78  qla2xxx 5:0:14:0NA
15  03592E0607857440  qla2xxx 5:0:15:0NA
16  03592E0607868729  qla2xxx 5:0:16:0NA


On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 8:09 AM, Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM  
eric-van.l...@klm.com wrote:

 Hi guys!
 I haven't had much experience with physical tape drives (we are using 
 DD VTL's only) but recently I installed a few stand-alone IBM LTO5 
 drives to be able to externalize TSM data on request. I need the 
 serial numbers of the drives for administrational purposes. I know TSM 
 reports a serial number in the drive definition, is this identical to 
 the physical serial number on the sticker on the back of the drive?
 Thanks for any reply in advance!
 Kind regards,
 Eric van Loon
 AF/KLM Storage Engineering
 
 For information, services and offers, please visit our web site:
 http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain 
 confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. 
 If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the 
 e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and 
 that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly 
 prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by 
 error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this 
 message.

 Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or 
 its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete 
 transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay 
 in receipt.
 Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal 
 Dutch
 Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with 
 registered number 33014286
 




--
*Zoltan Forray*
TSM Software  Hardware Administrator
Xymon Monitor Administrator
Virginia Commonwealth University
UCC/Office of Technology Services
www.ucc.vcu.edu
zfor...@vcu.edu - 804-828-4807
Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will never 
use email to request that you reply with your password, social security number

Journal Based Backup on RHEL5

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi TSM-ers!
I'm trying to install the 7.1 TSM client on one of our RHEL5 servers but I 
receive an error during the dependency check for one of the rpm's:
rpmlib(FileDigests) is needed by TIVsm-filepath-7.1.2-0.x86_64
rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) is needed by TIVsm-filepath-7.1.2-0.x86_64
This message seems to indicate that the rpm was created on a different (read 
higher) RedHat version. Also the Linux client tar file contains three versions 
of the filepath rpm:

TIVsm-filepath-7.1.2-0-rhel7.x86_64.rpm (for RedHat 7)
TIVsm-filepath-7.1.2-0-sles11sp2.x86_64.rpm (for Suse Linux Enterprise Server 
11)
TIVsm-filepath-7.1.2-0-rhel64.x86_64.rpm (for RedHat 6.4)

This would indicate that JBB is only available for RHEL6.4 while it's bundled 
in a release which support RHEL5 and 6. I also cannot find any document on the 
IBM website which states that RHEL5 is not supported or that 6.4 is the minimum 
release for JBB...
Thanks for any help in advance and have a nice weekend!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering


For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message.

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

Re: Virtualmountpoint not working

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi Andy!
I don't know what happened on the host but all of a sudden it seems to work... 
Of course nobody did change anything on the host and I didn't change anything 
either. Very frustrating but anyway, I was able to perform a successful 
recovery with TBMR.
Thanks again for all your help!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Andrew 
Raibeck
Sent: donderdag 16 juli 2015 12:43
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Virtualmountpoint not working

Hi Eric,

I ran a test of this on an RHEL 6 x86_64 system using TSM client version 7.1.2. 
I added virtualmountpoint /dev to my dsm.sys file, then ran an incremental 
backup (dsmc i). It backed up all local file systems include /dev (which is 
automatically added to domain all-local). Some
thoughts:

1. Try a manual test first, as proof of concept, e.g., dsmc i /dev

2. If dsm.sys has multiple stanzas, make sure the scheduler is using the 
correct stanza (or that the virtualmountpoint setting is in the correct stanza).

3. Make sure the scheduler is not passing a list of file systems (which does 
not include /dev) to the dsmc command line input. If the scheduler saves a log 
of its activity, review that log to see what it is doing; if it redirects the 
dsmc output to a file, check that file to see what it is doing.

Best regards,

- Andy



Andrew Raibeck | Tivoli Storage Manager Level 3 Technical Lead | 
stor...@us.ibm.com

IBM Tivoli Storage Manager links:
Product support:
http://www.ibm.com/support/entry/portal/Overview/Software/Tivoli/Tivoli_Storage_Manager

Online documentation:
http://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSGSG7/welcome
Product Wiki:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/wikis/home/wiki/Tivoli%20Storage%20Manager

ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 2015-07-15
09:24:34:

 From: Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM eric-van.l...@klm.com
 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Date: 2015-07-15 09:25
 Subject: Re: Virtualmountpoint not working Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor 
 Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU

 Hi David!
 We don't use the TSM scheduler, we use a third party scheduler. So 
 every backup is a new dsmc session which should pick up all dsm.sys
changes.
 It's a RedHat 6 server with the 7.1.2.0 TSM client installed.
 Kind regards,
 Eric van Loon
 AF/KLM Storage Engineering


 -Original Message-
 From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf 
 Of David Ehresman
 Sent: woensdag 15 juli 2015 15:00
 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Subject: Re: Virtualmountpoint not working

 Andy is correct that in a select from the backups tables the '/dev'
 will be the filespace_name and not the hl_name.  But the '/dev'
 should show in the q filespace.

 Did you restart dsmcad and/or dsmc sched after updateing the dsm.sys 
 file?  Is the dsm.sys in the default location or is it possible the 
 backup is using a different dsm.sys?  What level of TSM clinet and 
 what level of Linux?

 David

 -Original Message-
 From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf 
 Of Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM
 Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 8:48 AM
 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Virtualmountpoint not working

 Hi Andy!
 /dev Is not in the list returned from the q filespace kl1241m3. No 
 error messages in the output from the backup job related to /dev too...
 Kind regards,
 Eric van Loon
 AF/KLM Storage Engineering


 -Original Message-
 From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf 
 Of Andrew Raibeck
 Sent: woensdag 15 juli 2015 14:14
 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Subject: Re: Virtualmountpoint not working

 Hi Eric,

 Besides the items you have highlighted so far (dsmc q opt, select * 
 from backups), what makes you think this file system is not being 
 backed up? Are there not TSM related logs (dsmsched.log) you could 
 look at? Also, what does the admin command q filespace kl1241m3
 show you? I would think with virtual mount points, /dev would be the 
 file system name, not the high level name...

 Best regards,

 - Andy





 Andrew Raibeck | Tivoli Storage Manager Level 3 Technical Lead | 
 stor...@us.ibm.com

 IBM Tivoli Storage Manager links:
 Product support:
 https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?

u=http-3A__www.ibm.com_support_entry_portal_Overview_Software_Tivoli_Tivoli-5FStorage-5FManagerd=AwIFAgc=SgMrq23dbjbGX6e0ZsSHgEZX6A4IAf1SO3AJ2bNrHlkr=dOGCMY197NTNH1k_wcsrWS3_fxedKW4rpKJ8cHCD2L8m=A-


eAC37SW0_RRCWxxfnp9TAA2IvAVIQWPOtsKsT0iuQs=CqTFuridF8sv3XhQDbmEyoIYNvcEnQu31irlxAMn21we=


 Online documentation:
 https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?

u=http-3A__www.ibm.com_support_knowledgecenter_SSGSG7_welcomed=AwIFAgc=SgMrq23dbjbGX6e0ZsSHgEZX6A4IAf1SO3AJ2bNrHlkr

Re: Virtualmountpoint not working

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi Andy!
/dev Is not in the list returned from the q filespace kl1241m3. No error 
messages in the output from the backup job related to /dev too...
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Andrew 
Raibeck
Sent: woensdag 15 juli 2015 14:14
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Virtualmountpoint not working

Hi Eric,

Besides the items you have highlighted so far (dsmc q opt, select * from 
backups), what makes you think this file system is not being backed up? Are 
there not TSM related logs (dsmsched.log) you could look at? Also, what does 
the admin command q filespace kl1241m3 show you? I would think with virtual 
mount points, /dev would be the file system name, not the high level name...

Best regards,

- Andy



Andrew Raibeck | Tivoli Storage Manager Level 3 Technical Lead | 
stor...@us.ibm.com

IBM Tivoli Storage Manager links:
Product support:
http://www.ibm.com/support/entry/portal/Overview/Software/Tivoli/Tivoli_Storage_Manager

Online documentation:
http://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSGSG7/welcome
Product Wiki:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/wikis/home/wiki/Tivoli%20Storage%20Manager

ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 2015-07-15
07:15:28:

 From: Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM eric-van.l...@klm.com
 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Date: 2015-07-15 07:16
 Subject: Re: Virtualmountpoint not working Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor 
 Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU

 Hi David!
 Nope, still not working...

 tsm: AMSE2select * from backups where node_name='KL1241M3' and 
 hl_name='/dev' or hl_name='/DEV'
 ANR2034E SELECT: No match found using this criteria.
 ANS8001I Return code 11.

 I guess I will have to open a PMR for it. Thanks for your help!
 Kind regards,
 Eric van Loon
 AF/KLM Storage Engineering

 -Original Message-
 From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf 
 Of David Ehresman
 Sent: dinsdag 14 juli 2015 16:50
 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Subject: Re: Virtualmountpoint not working

 I'd try a backup.  I'm pretty sure it is just weird formatting of the 
 q opt output.  Yours looks like mine and it is working fine.

 David

 -Original Message-
 From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf 
 Of Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM
 Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 10:40 AM
 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Virtualmountpoint not working

 Hi David!
 Something weird is going on here. Here is the output from just the 
 dsmc q opt command:

   VCDVAPP: NO
VERIFYVAPP: NO
 VERIFYVAPPEXT: NO
 VIRTUALMOUNTPOINT:
/dev
   VIRTUALNODENAME: KL1241M3
 VMAUTOSTARTVM: NO
 VMBACKDIR:
VMBACKNODELETE: NO
  VMBACKUPTYPE: FULLVM

 Notice the fact that /dev is not behind the VIRTUALMOUNTPOINT line but 
 on the next line! I deleted the whole line (through vi) and recreated 
 it (also through vi), just to prevent special characters or crlf's, 
 but to no avail...
 Kind regards,
 Eric van Loon
 AF/KLM Storage Engineering


 -Original Message-
 From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf 
 Of David Ehresman
 Sent: dinsdag 14 juli 2015 14:22
 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Subject: Re: Virtualmountpoint not working

 Try  dsmc q opt|less or just  dsmc q opt|.  On my Linux TBMR 
 systems the /dev is on the line following  VIRTUALMOUNTPOINT: in the 
 q opt output.

 David

 -Original Message-
 From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf 
 Of Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM
 Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 5:31 AM
 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Subject: [ADSM-L] Virtualmountpoint not working

 Hi guys!
 I have a Linux client with Cristie TBMR installed on it. TBRM requires 
 that /dev is backed up which is normally excluded by the Linux BA 
 client. To force this backup I need to add the virtualmountpoint 
 parameter to the dsm.sys file which I did:

 servernameKL1241M3_client
 tcpserveraddress  KL1245DY.IS.KLMCORP.NET
 nodename  KL1241M3
 tcpport   1502
 tcpwindowsize 63
 tcpbuffsize   512
 txnbytelimit  2097152
 passwordaccessGENERATE
 virtualmountpoint /dev
 errorlogname  /opt/tivoli/tsm/log/ba/dsmerror_KL1241M3_client.log
 errorlogr 14 d
 schedlogname  /opt/tivoli/tsm/log/ba/sched_KL1241M3_client.log
 schedlogretention 14

passworddir   /opt/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/config/KL1241M3_client

 However, it is not working:

 [root@kl1241m3 bin]# dsmc q opt|grep VIRTUAL
 VIRTUALMOUNTPOINT:
   VIRTUALNODENAME: KL1241M3

 Does anybody have an idea why it isn't working? Thanks for any reply 
 in advance!
 Kind regards,
 Eric van

Re: Virtualmountpoint not working

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi David!
Nope, still not working...

tsm: AMSE2select * from backups where node_name='KL1241M3' and hl_name='/dev' 
or hl_name='/DEV'
ANR2034E SELECT: No match found using this criteria.
ANS8001I Return code 11.

I guess I will have to open a PMR for it. Thanks for your help!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of David 
Ehresman
Sent: dinsdag 14 juli 2015 16:50
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Virtualmountpoint not working

I'd try a backup.  I'm pretty sure it is just weird formatting of the q opt 
output.  Yours looks like mine and it is working fine.

David

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Loon, 
EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 10:40 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Virtualmountpoint not working

Hi David!
Something weird is going on here. Here is the output from just the dsmc q opt 
command:

  VCDVAPP: NO
   VERIFYVAPP: NO
VERIFYVAPPEXT: NO
VIRTUALMOUNTPOINT:
   /dev
  VIRTUALNODENAME: KL1241M3
VMAUTOSTARTVM: NO
VMBACKDIR:
   VMBACKNODELETE: NO
 VMBACKUPTYPE: FULLVM

Notice the fact that /dev is not behind the VIRTUALMOUNTPOINT line but on the 
next line! I deleted the whole line (through vi) and recreated it (also through 
vi), just to prevent special characters or crlf's, but to no avail...
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of David 
Ehresman
Sent: dinsdag 14 juli 2015 14:22
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Virtualmountpoint not working

Try  dsmc q opt|less or just  dsmc q opt|.  On my Linux TBMR systems the 
/dev is on the line following  VIRTUALMOUNTPOINT: in the q opt output.

David

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Loon, 
EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 5:31 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Virtualmountpoint not working

Hi guys!
I have a Linux client with Cristie TBMR installed on it. TBRM requires that 
/dev is backed up which is normally excluded by the Linux BA client. To force 
this backup I need to add the virtualmountpoint parameter to the dsm.sys file 
which I did:

servernameKL1241M3_client
tcpserveraddress  KL1245DY.IS.KLMCORP.NET
nodename  KL1241M3
tcpport   1502
tcpwindowsize 63
tcpbuffsize   512
txnbytelimit  2097152
passwordaccessGENERATE
virtualmountpoint /dev
errorlogname  /opt/tivoli/tsm/log/ba/dsmerror_KL1241M3_client.log
errorlogr 14 d
schedlogname  /opt/tivoli/tsm/log/ba/sched_KL1241M3_client.log
schedlogretention 14
passworddir   /opt/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/config/KL1241M3_client

However, it is not working:

[root@kl1241m3 bin]# dsmc q opt|grep VIRTUAL
VIRTUALMOUNTPOINT:
  VIRTUALNODENAME: KL1241M3

Does anybody have an idea why it isn't working? Thanks for any reply in advance!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering


For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.klm.comd=AwIFAgc=SgMrq23dbjbGX6e0ZsSHgEZX6A4IAf1SO3AJ2bNrHlkr=dOGCMY197NTNH1k_wcsrWS3_fxedKW4rpKJ8cHCD2L8m=zRZySPde5K8g5HM2MgdZeo5_T4q_-3WENanGqgUMIFss=cPAPShFFO7dJTjS66hvtrWzA4La8q2OD69GwBMv2CYIe=
 . This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged 
material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are 
notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied 
or distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment 
is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail 
by error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete 
this message.

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286


For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.klm.comd=AwIFAgc=SgMrq23dbjbGX6e0ZsSHgEZX6A4IAf1SO3AJ2bNrHlkr=dOGCMY197NTNH1k_wcsrWS3_fxedKW4rpKJ8cHCD2L8m=ITDljnHFAEFc6SSAuAWUQH-lb3-YoRAjrYvVXXkKIOUs

Re: Virtualmountpoint not working

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi Stef!
Our Linux guys tell me that /dev is not a filesystem but a directory. That's 
why it's not in the output from the mount command, nor in the output from the 
df command.
The content is indeed dynamically build up during boot, but the TBMR manual 
specifically states that it should be backed up for the product to work 
properly...
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Stef 
Coene
Sent: woensdag 15 juli 2015 14:09
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Virtualmountpoint not working

On Tuesday 14 July 2015 09:31:10 you wrote:
 Hi guys!
 I have a Linux client with Cristie TBMR installed on it. TBRM requires 
 that /dev is backed up which is normally excluded by the Linux BA 
 client. To force this backup I need to add the virtualmountpoint 
 parameter to the dsm.sys file which I did:
/dev is a virtual file system that only exist in memory.
Check the output of the mount command:

udev on /dev type devtmpfs (rw,mode=0755)

I'm pretty sure you don't need /dev for restore since it's build up dynamically 
by udev during boot and while loading kernel modules.


Stef

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. 
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

Re: Virtualmountpoint not working

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi David!
We don't use the TSM scheduler, we use a third party scheduler. So every backup 
is a new dsmc session which should pick up all dsm.sys changes.
It's a RedHat 6 server with the 7.1.2.0 TSM client installed.
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of David 
Ehresman
Sent: woensdag 15 juli 2015 15:00
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Virtualmountpoint not working

Andy is correct that in a select from the backups tables the '/dev' will be the 
filespace_name and not the hl_name.  But the '/dev' should show in the q 
filespace.  

Did you restart dsmcad and/or dsmc sched after updateing the dsm.sys file?  Is 
the dsm.sys in the default location or is it possible the backup is using a 
different dsm.sys?  What level of TSM clinet and what level of Linux?

David

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Loon, 
EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 8:48 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Virtualmountpoint not working

Hi Andy!
/dev Is not in the list returned from the q filespace kl1241m3. No error 
messages in the output from the backup job related to /dev too...
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Andrew 
Raibeck
Sent: woensdag 15 juli 2015 14:14
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Virtualmountpoint not working

Hi Eric,

Besides the items you have highlighted so far (dsmc q opt, select * from 
backups), what makes you think this file system is not being backed up? Are 
there not TSM related logs (dsmsched.log) you could look at? Also, what does 
the admin command q filespace kl1241m3 show you? I would think with virtual 
mount points, /dev would be the file system name, not the high level name...

Best regards,

- Andy



Andrew Raibeck | Tivoli Storage Manager Level 3 Technical Lead | 
stor...@us.ibm.com

IBM Tivoli Storage Manager links:
Product support:
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.ibm.com_support_entry_portal_Overview_Software_Tivoli_Tivoli-5FStorage-5FManagerd=AwIFAgc=SgMrq23dbjbGX6e0ZsSHgEZX6A4IAf1SO3AJ2bNrHlkr=dOGCMY197NTNH1k_wcsrWS3_fxedKW4rpKJ8cHCD2L8m=A-eAC37SW0_RRCWxxfnp9TAA2IvAVIQWPOtsKsT0iuQs=CqTFuridF8sv3XhQDbmEyoIYNvcEnQu31irlxAMn21we=
 

Online documentation:
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.ibm.com_support_knowledgecenter_SSGSG7_welcomed=AwIFAgc=SgMrq23dbjbGX6e0ZsSHgEZX6A4IAf1SO3AJ2bNrHlkr=dOGCMY197NTNH1k_wcsrWS3_fxedKW4rpKJ8cHCD2L8m=A-eAC37SW0_RRCWxxfnp9TAA2IvAVIQWPOtsKsT0iuQs=rscMR9BSbkLiSM3677xR9s_y-WdJl8jLnoU8lgHmyxQe=
Product Wiki:
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ibm.com_developerworks_community_wikis_home_wiki_Tivoli-2520Storage-2520Managerd=AwIFAgc=SgMrq23dbjbGX6e0ZsSHgEZX6A4IAf1SO3AJ2bNrHlkr=dOGCMY197NTNH1k_wcsrWS3_fxedKW4rpKJ8cHCD2L8m=A-eAC37SW0_RRCWxxfnp9TAA2IvAVIQWPOtsKsT0iuQs=uJvCAfIRT7vLJvpqenAJmQDhQKXmLWRr-aFhZZ_jYqEe=
 

ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 2015-07-15
07:15:28:

 From: Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM eric-van.l...@klm.com
 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Date: 2015-07-15 07:16
 Subject: Re: Virtualmountpoint not working Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor 
 Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU

 Hi David!
 Nope, still not working...

 tsm: AMSE2select * from backups where node_name='KL1241M3' and 
 hl_name='/dev' or hl_name='/DEV'
 ANR2034E SELECT: No match found using this criteria.
 ANS8001I Return code 11.

 I guess I will have to open a PMR for it. Thanks for your help!
 Kind regards,
 Eric van Loon
 AF/KLM Storage Engineering

 -Original Message-
 From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf 
 Of David Ehresman
 Sent: dinsdag 14 juli 2015 16:50
 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Subject: Re: Virtualmountpoint not working

 I'd try a backup.  I'm pretty sure it is just weird formatting of the 
 q opt output.  Yours looks like mine and it is working fine.

 David

 -Original Message-
 From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf 
 Of Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM
 Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 10:40 AM
 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Virtualmountpoint not working

 Hi David!
 Something weird is going on here. Here is the output from just the 
 dsmc q opt command:

   VCDVAPP: NO
VERIFYVAPP: NO
 VERIFYVAPPEXT: NO
 VIRTUALMOUNTPOINT:
/dev
   VIRTUALNODENAME: KL1241M3
 VMAUTOSTARTVM: NO
 VMBACKDIR:
VMBACKNODELETE: NO
  VMBACKUPTYPE: FULLVM

 Notice the fact that /dev is not behind the VIRTUALMOUNTPOINT line but 
 on the next line! I deleted the whole line (through vi) and recreated

Virtualmountpoint not working

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi guys!
I have a Linux client with Cristie TBMR installed on it. TBRM requires that 
/dev is backed up which is normally excluded by the Linux BA client. To force 
this backup I need to add the virtualmountpoint parameter to the dsm.sys file 
which I did:

servernameKL1241M3_client
tcpserveraddress  KL1245DY.IS.KLMCORP.NET
nodename  KL1241M3
tcpport   1502
tcpwindowsize 63
tcpbuffsize   512
txnbytelimit  2097152
passwordaccessGENERATE
virtualmountpoint /dev
errorlogname  /opt/tivoli/tsm/log/ba/dsmerror_KL1241M3_client.log
errorlogr 14 d
schedlogname  /opt/tivoli/tsm/log/ba/sched_KL1241M3_client.log
schedlogretention 14
passworddir   /opt/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/config/KL1241M3_client

However, it is not working:

[root@kl1241m3 bin]# dsmc q opt|grep VIRTUAL
VIRTUALMOUNTPOINT:
  VIRTUALNODENAME: KL1241M3

Does anybody have an idea why it isn't working? Thanks for any reply in advance!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering


For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message.

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

Re: Virtualmountpoint not working

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi David!
Something weird is going on here. Here is the output from just the dsmc q opt 
command:

  VCDVAPP: NO
   VERIFYVAPP: NO
VERIFYVAPPEXT: NO
VIRTUALMOUNTPOINT:
   /dev
  VIRTUALNODENAME: KL1241M3
VMAUTOSTARTVM: NO
VMBACKDIR:
   VMBACKNODELETE: NO
 VMBACKUPTYPE: FULLVM

Notice the fact that /dev is not behind the VIRTUALMOUNTPOINT line but on the 
next line! I deleted the whole line (through vi) and recreated it (also through 
vi), just to prevent special characters or crlf's, but to no avail...
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of David 
Ehresman
Sent: dinsdag 14 juli 2015 14:22
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Virtualmountpoint not working

Try  dsmc q opt|less or just  dsmc q opt|.  On my Linux TBMR systems the 
/dev is on the line following  VIRTUALMOUNTPOINT: in the q opt output.

David

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Loon, 
EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 5:31 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Virtualmountpoint not working

Hi guys!
I have a Linux client with Cristie TBMR installed on it. TBRM requires that 
/dev is backed up which is normally excluded by the Linux BA client. To force 
this backup I need to add the virtualmountpoint parameter to the dsm.sys file 
which I did:

servernameKL1241M3_client
tcpserveraddress  KL1245DY.IS.KLMCORP.NET
nodename  KL1241M3
tcpport   1502
tcpwindowsize 63
tcpbuffsize   512
txnbytelimit  2097152
passwordaccessGENERATE
virtualmountpoint /dev
errorlogname  /opt/tivoli/tsm/log/ba/dsmerror_KL1241M3_client.log
errorlogr 14 d
schedlogname  /opt/tivoli/tsm/log/ba/sched_KL1241M3_client.log
schedlogretention 14
passworddir   /opt/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/config/KL1241M3_client

However, it is not working:

[root@kl1241m3 bin]# dsmc q opt|grep VIRTUAL
VIRTUALMOUNTPOINT:
  VIRTUALNODENAME: KL1241M3

Does anybody have an idea why it isn't working? Thanks for any reply in advance!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering


For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.klm.comd=AwIFAgc=SgMrq23dbjbGX6e0ZsSHgEZX6A4IAf1SO3AJ2bNrHlkr=dOGCMY197NTNH1k_wcsrWS3_fxedKW4rpKJ8cHCD2L8m=zRZySPde5K8g5HM2MgdZeo5_T4q_-3WENanGqgUMIFss=cPAPShFFO7dJTjS66hvtrWzA4La8q2OD69GwBMv2CYIe=
 . This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged 
material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are 
notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied 
or distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment 
is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail 
by error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete 
this message.

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286


For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. 
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

Re: Trailing .000000

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi Grant!
This was exactly what I was looking for. Thank you VERY much!!!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Grant 
Street
Sent: maandag 6 juli 2015 7:42
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Trailing .00

try this

select varchar_format (actlog.date_time, '-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS') as date_time 
, actlog.nodename as Nodename, actlog.message as Message, nodes.node_name, 
nodes.contact from nodes,actlog where nodes.contact like 'Component Team 
Windows%%' and actlog.nodename=nodes.node_name and actlog.originator='CLIENT' 
and actlog.severity  'I' and cast(timestampdiff(16, current_timestamp - 
actlog.date_time) as decimal(4,1))= 2 group by actlog.nodename, 
actlog.date_time, actlog.message, nodes.node_name, nodes.contact order by 
actlog.nodename






On 02/07/15 01:08, Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM wrote:
 Hi Kurt!
 Your SQL does indeed return the output I'm looking for, but how dow I embed 
 it in the following SQL statement?

 select actlog.date_time, actlog.nodename as Nodename, actlog.message as 
 Message, nodes.node_name, nodes.contact from nodes,actlog where 
 nodes.contact like 'Component Team Windows%%' and 
 actlog.nodename=nodes.node_name and actlog.originator='CLIENT' and 
 actlog.severity  'I' and cast(timestampdiff(16, current_timestamp - 
 actlog.date_time) as decimal(4,1))= 2 group by actlog.nodename, 
 actlog.date_time, actlog.message, nodes.node_name, nodes.contact order by 
 actlog.nodename

 Again, thanks for your help!
 Kind regards,
 Eric van Loon
 AF/KLM Storage Engineering


 -Original Message-
 From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of 
 BEYERS Kurt
 Sent: woensdag 1 juli 2015 15:57
 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Subject: Re: Trailing .00

 Hi Eric,

 It's always fun to play and calculate with timestamps in db2, here is one of 
 the solutions to get the desired format:

 tsm: TSMLABO3select date_time from actlog fetch first 2 rows only

DATE_TIME
 ---
   2015-03-27 07:06:10.00
   2015-03-27 07:06:10.00

 tsm: TSMLABO3select varchar_format (date_time, '-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS') as 
 date_time from actlog fetch first 2 rows only

 DATE_TIME: 2015-03-27 07:06:10
 DATE_TIME: 2015-03-27 07:06:10

 Regards,
 Kurt

 -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
 Van: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] Namens Loon, EJ 
 van (ITOPT3) - KLM
 Verzonden: woensdag 1 juli 2015 15:17
 Aan: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Onderwerp: [ADSM-L] Trailing .00

 Hi guys!
 Now that I have my SQL statement working I noticed that a select date_time 
 from actlog returns the following format:

 2015-06-29 23:27:04.00

 What is the proper way to remove the trailing .00?
 Again, thanks for your help!!!
 Kind regards,
 Eric van Loon
 AF/KLM Storage Engineering

 
 For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
 http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential 
 and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
 addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may 
 be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to 
 this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you 
 have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by 
 return e-mail, and delete this message.

 Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
 employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
 this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
 Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
 Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered 
 number 33014286
 

 *** Disclaimer ***
 Vlaamse Radio- en Televisieomroeporganisatie Auguste Reyerslaan 52
 1043 Brussel

 nv van publiek recht
 BTW BE 0244.142.664
 RPR Brussel
 VRT Gebruikersvoorwaarden http://www.vrt.be/gebruiksvoorwaarden
 
 For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
 http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential 
 and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
 addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may 
 be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to 
 this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you 
 have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by 
 return e-mail, and delete this message.

 Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
 employees shall not be liable

Re: Remove the Trailing .000000 in date_time

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi guys!
Does anybody know how to remove the .00 in the output from the SQL down 
below? Kurt gave a suggestion, but I don't know how to embed it in the SQL 
statement...
Thanks for your help in advance!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering

-Original Message-
From: Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM 
Sent: woensdag 1 juli 2015 17:08
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: RE: Trailing .00

Hi Kurt!
Your SQL does indeed return the output I'm looking for, but how dow I embed it 
in the following SQL statement?

select actlog.date_time, actlog.nodename as Nodename, actlog.message as 
Message, nodes.node_name, nodes.contact from nodes,actlog where nodes.contact 
like 'Component Team Windows%%' and actlog.nodename=nodes.node_name and 
actlog.originator='CLIENT' and actlog.severity  'I' and 
cast(timestampdiff(16, current_timestamp - actlog.date_time) as decimal(4,1))= 
2 group by actlog.nodename, actlog.date_time, actlog.message, nodes.node_name, 
nodes.contact order by actlog.nodename

Again, thanks for your help!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of BEYERS 
Kurt
Sent: woensdag 1 juli 2015 15:57
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Trailing .00

Hi Eric,

It's always fun to play and calculate with timestamps in db2, here is one of 
the solutions to get the desired format:

tsm: TSMLABO3select date_time from actlog fetch first 2 rows only

  DATE_TIME
---
 2015-03-27 07:06:10.00
 2015-03-27 07:06:10.00

tsm: TSMLABO3select varchar_format (date_time, '-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS') as 
date_time from actlog fetch first 2 rows only

DATE_TIME: 2015-03-27 07:06:10
DATE_TIME: 2015-03-27 07:06:10

Regards,
Kurt

-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] Namens Loon, EJ van 
(ITOPT3) - KLM
Verzonden: woensdag 1 juli 2015 15:17
Aan: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Onderwerp: [ADSM-L] Trailing .00

Hi guys!
Now that I have my SQL statement working I noticed that a select date_time from 
actlog returns the following format:

2015-06-29 23:27:04.00

What is the proper way to remove the trailing .00?
Again, thanks for your help!!!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering


For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message.

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286


*** Disclaimer ***
Vlaamse Radio- en Televisieomroeporganisatie Auguste Reyerslaan 52
1043 Brussel

nv van publiek recht
BTW BE 0244.142.664
RPR Brussel
VRT Gebruikersvoorwaarden http://www.vrt.be/gebruiksvoorwaarden

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. 
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

Trailing .000000

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi guys!
Now that I have my SQL statement working I noticed that a select date_time from 
actlog returns the following format:

2015-06-29 23:27:04.00

What is the proper way to remove the trailing .00?
Again, thanks for your help!!!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering


For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message.

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

Re: SQL statement not working

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi Remco!
How could I be so stupid... :-(
Thank you very much for your help!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Remco 
Post
Sent: woensdag 1 juli 2015 13:19
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: SQL statement not working

you’re missing the from clause of your sql statement.

 Op 1 jul. 2015, om 09:49 heeft Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM 
 eric-van.l...@klm.com het volgende geschreven:
 
 Hi guys!
 I'm trying to select all ANE4987E messages for all nodes with the text 
 'Component Team Windows' in the contact field. For some reason I cannot get 
 the SQL statement to work. What am I doing wrong?
 
 select actlog.date_time, actlog.nodename, actlog.message, nodes.node_name, 
 nodes.contact where nodes.contact like 'Component Team Windows%%' and 
 actlog.nodename=nodes.node_name and actlog.msgno=4987
 
 ANR2905E Unexpected SQL identifier token - 'NODESVIEW.CONTACT'.
 
|
 ...V...
 ODESVIEW.CONTACT where NODESVIEW.CONTACT like 'Component Team W
 
 ANS8001I Return code 3.
 
 Thank you very much for your help in advance!
 Kind regards,
 Eric van Loon
 AF/KLM Storage Engineering
 
 For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
 http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential 
 and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
 addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may 
 be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to 
 this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you 
 have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by 
 return e-mail, and delete this message.
 
 Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
 employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
 this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
 Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
 Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered 
 number 33014286
 

-- 

 Met vriendelijke groeten/Kind Regards,

Remco Post
r.p...@plcs.nl
+31 6 248 21 622

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. 
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

Re: Trailing .000000

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi Kurt!
Your SQL does indeed return the output I'm looking for, but how dow I embed it 
in the following SQL statement?

select actlog.date_time, actlog.nodename as Nodename, actlog.message as 
Message, nodes.node_name, nodes.contact from nodes,actlog where nodes.contact 
like 'Component Team Windows%%' and actlog.nodename=nodes.node_name and 
actlog.originator='CLIENT' and actlog.severity  'I' and 
cast(timestampdiff(16, current_timestamp - actlog.date_time) as decimal(4,1))= 
2 group by actlog.nodename, actlog.date_time, actlog.message, nodes.node_name, 
nodes.contact order by actlog.nodename

Again, thanks for your help!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of BEYERS 
Kurt
Sent: woensdag 1 juli 2015 15:57
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Trailing .00

Hi Eric,

It's always fun to play and calculate with timestamps in db2, here is one of 
the solutions to get the desired format:

tsm: TSMLABO3select date_time from actlog fetch first 2 rows only

  DATE_TIME
---
 2015-03-27 07:06:10.00
 2015-03-27 07:06:10.00

tsm: TSMLABO3select varchar_format (date_time, '-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS') as 
date_time from actlog fetch first 2 rows only

DATE_TIME: 2015-03-27 07:06:10
DATE_TIME: 2015-03-27 07:06:10

Regards,
Kurt

-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] Namens Loon, EJ van 
(ITOPT3) - KLM
Verzonden: woensdag 1 juli 2015 15:17
Aan: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Onderwerp: [ADSM-L] Trailing .00

Hi guys!
Now that I have my SQL statement working I noticed that a select date_time from 
actlog returns the following format:

2015-06-29 23:27:04.00

What is the proper way to remove the trailing .00?
Again, thanks for your help!!!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering


For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message.

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286


*** Disclaimer ***
Vlaamse Radio- en Televisieomroeporganisatie Auguste Reyerslaan 52
1043 Brussel

nv van publiek recht
BTW BE 0244.142.664
RPR Brussel
VRT Gebruikersvoorwaarden http://www.vrt.be/gebruiksvoorwaarden

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. 
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

SQL statement not working

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi guys!
I'm trying to select all ANE4987E messages for all nodes with the text 
'Component Team Windows' in the contact field. For some reason I cannot get the 
SQL statement to work. What am I doing wrong?

select actlog.date_time, actlog.nodename, actlog.message, nodes.node_name, 
nodes.contact where nodes.contact like 'Component Team Windows%%' and 
actlog.nodename=nodes.node_name and actlog.msgno=4987

ANR2905E Unexpected SQL identifier token - 'NODESVIEW.CONTACT'.

|
 ...V...
 ODESVIEW.CONTACT where NODESVIEW.CONTACT like 'Component Team W

ANS8001I Return code 3.

Thank you very much for your help in advance!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message.

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

Re: Domino TDP client support on Solaris SPARC

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi Zoltan!
I also was talking about the (API) client, a carriage return line feed was 
missing from my reply:
The readme TSM for Mail 6.1.3 (Data Protection for Lotus Domino 5.5.3): 
contains the following requirements:
Any Tivoli Storage Manager Server version still in support
A Tivoli Storage Manager API V5.5.1, or later
The latter line was the one I was referring to, any TSM API version later than 
5.5.1 is supported, but if you run into issues, IBM will most likely not help 
because the TDP client itself is out of support... We are in the same boat.
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Zoltan 
Forray
Sent: vrijdag 19 juni 2015 18:28
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Domino TDP client support on Solaris SPARC

I am not talking about the server - I want to upgrade the Solaris SPARC client 
on this machine to a higher, patched level but not effect/impact the TSM TDP 
for Domino, which can not be upgraded.

On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM  
eric-van.l...@klm.com wrote:

 Hi Zoltan!
 I take it you are talking about TSM for Mail 6.1.3 which contains the 
 Data Protection for Lotus Domino 5.5.3 client?
 The readme: contains the following requirements:
 Any Tivoli Storage Manager Server version still in support A Tivoli 
 Storage Manager API V5.5.1, or later So the 6.3 API is supported, but 
 then again, the TDP client isn't... So technically it should work (and 
 I think it most likely will) but who will help you if it doesn't...
 Kind regards,
 Eric van Loon
 AF/KLM Storage Engineering

 -Original Message-
 From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf 
 Of Zoltan Forray
 Sent: woensdag 17 juni 2015 17:26
 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Subject: Domino TDP client support on Solaris SPARC

 Yes, I realize this combination is not supported any more and we are 
 down to our last 4-boxes trying to phase them out.  Here is my question.

 Currently, we are running TSM client 6.3.0.0 and TDP for Domino 6.1.3.0.
 We are having trouble trying to run the webclient.

 Since we can't update the TDP (highest we can go on SPARC and I can't 
 find any TDP updates to the 6.3 base client on the FTP site), can we 
 safely update the base client to the latest 6.3.2.3 without killing 
 the TDP backups?

 --
 *Zoltan Forray*
 TSM Software  Hardware Administrator
 Xymon Monitor Administrator
 Virginia Commonwealth University
 UCC/Office of Technology Services
 www.ucc.vcu.edu
 zfor...@vcu.edu - 804-828-4807
 Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations 
 will never use email to request that you reply with your password, 
 social security number or confidential personal information. For more 
 details visit http://infosecurity.vcu.edu/phishing.html
 
 For information, services and offers, please visit our web site:
 http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain 
 confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. 
 If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the 
 e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and 
 that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly 
 prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by 
 error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this 
 message.

 Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or 
 its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete 
 transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay 
 in receipt.
 Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal 
 Dutch
 Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with 
 registered number 33014286
 




--
*Zoltan Forray*
TSM Software  Hardware Administrator
Xymon Monitor Administrator
Virginia Commonwealth University
UCC/Office of Technology Services
www.ucc.vcu.edu
zfor...@vcu.edu - 804-828-4807
Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will never 
use email to request that you reply with your password, social security number 
or confidential personal information. For more details visit 
http://infosecurity.vcu.edu/phishing.html

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify

Re: Domino TDP client support on Solaris SPARC

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi Zoltan!
I take it you are talking about TSM for Mail 6.1.3 which contains the Data 
Protection for Lotus Domino 5.5.3 client?
The readme: contains the following requirements:
Any Tivoli Storage Manager Server version still in support
A Tivoli Storage Manager API V5.5.1, or later
So the 6.3 API is supported, but then again, the TDP client isn't... So 
technically it should work (and I think it most likely will) but who will help 
you if it doesn't...
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Zoltan 
Forray
Sent: woensdag 17 juni 2015 17:26
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Domino TDP client support on Solaris SPARC

Yes, I realize this combination is not supported any more and we are down to 
our last 4-boxes trying to phase them out.  Here is my question.

Currently, we are running TSM client 6.3.0.0 and TDP for Domino 6.1.3.0.
We are having trouble trying to run the webclient.

Since we can't update the TDP (highest we can go on SPARC and I can't find any 
TDP updates to the 6.3 base client on the FTP site), can we safely update the 
base client to the latest 6.3.2.3 without killing the TDP backups?

--
*Zoltan Forray*
TSM Software  Hardware Administrator
Xymon Monitor Administrator
Virginia Commonwealth University
UCC/Office of Technology Services
www.ucc.vcu.edu
zfor...@vcu.edu - 804-828-4807
Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will never 
use email to request that you reply with your password, social security number 
or confidential personal information. For more details visit 
http://infosecurity.vcu.edu/phishing.html

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. 
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

Re: Removing obsolete TDP for MySAP files from TSM

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi Karsten!
That's not how TDP backups should be handled. TDP for SAP backups (which are 
indeed archives) should expire only when the archive file is deleted by the TDP 
client. The client should be in control.
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of 
Karsten Pilz
Sent: vrijdag 22 mei 2015 22:20
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Removing obsolete TDP for MySAP files from TSM

Hello Eric,

Normally such a tool should not be required for TDP MySAP.
TDP Oracle stores files as backup which will not become inactive since every 
filename is unique. TDP MySAP is doing archive, so files should expire 
corresponding to the policy you defined.

Cheers,

Karsten

Am 22.05.2015 um 10:54 schrieb Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM:
 Hi TSM-ers! (or should I say ISP-ers since the product will be renamed in the 
 near future?)!
 We are using TDP for MySAP to back-up our SAP databases. For several clients 
 I see that files are left behind in TSM which no longer exist in the SAP 
 repository.
 When you backup Oracle by using TDP for Oracle you have a tool called 
 tdposync which compares the RMAN catalog with TSM and it allows you to delete 
 files from TSM which are not in RMAN. How does this work in TDP for MySAP?
 Thank you very much for any help in advance!
 Kind regards,
 Eric van Loon
 AF/KLM Storage Engineering
 
 For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
 http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential 
 and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
 addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may 
 be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to 
 this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you 
 have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by 
 return e-mail, and delete this message.

 Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
 employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
 this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
 Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal 
 Dutch Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with 
 registered number 33014286
 

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. 
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

Removing obsolete TDP for MySAP files from TSM

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi TSM-ers! (or should I say ISP-ers since the product will be renamed in the 
near future?)!
We are using TDP for MySAP to back-up our SAP databases. For several clients I 
see that files are left behind in TSM which no longer exist in the SAP 
repository.
When you backup Oracle by using TDP for Oracle you have a tool called tdposync 
which compares the RMAN catalog with TSM and it allows you to delete files from 
TSM which are not in RMAN. How does this work in TDP for MySAP?
Thank you very much for any help in advance!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message.

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

Error when upgrading the 7.1 Linux client

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi TSM-ers!
Has anybody been able to upgrade their 7.1 Linux client to 7.1.2.0 on RedHat 5? 
When I try to upgrade it I receive the following error:

error: Failed dependencies:
rpmlib(FileDigests) = 4.6.0-1 is needed by 
TIVsm-filepath-7.1.2-0.x86_64
rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) = 5.2-1 is needed by TIVsm-filepath-7.1.2-0.x86_64

Which seems to indicate that the files where build with a higher rpm release 
that the one on RedHat 5...
Thanks for any help in advance!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message.

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

Re: Error when upgrading the 7.1 Linux client

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi Erwann!
I received the same error even when I selected only the API for installation!
Anyway, I managed to upgrade 7.1.1.0 to 7.1.2.0 by using yum instead of rpm. 
It's working now.
Thanks for your reply!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Erwann 
SIMON
Sent: dinsdag 21 april 2015 15:00
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Error when upgrading the 7.1 Linux client

Hello Eric,

TIVsm-filepath contains a kernel module used by tsmjbbd (TIVsm-JBB) and each is 
specific to a kernel version.

If you're not using tsmjbbd, you simply don't need those packages (TIVsm-JBB 
and TIVsm-filepath)

-- 
Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي
Erwann SIMON

- Mail original -
De: EJ van Loon (ITOPT3) - KLM eric-van.l...@klm.com
À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Envoyé: Mardi 21 Avril 2015 10:33:37
Objet: [ADSM-L] Error when upgrading the 7.1 Linux client

Hi TSM-ers!
Has anybody been able to upgrade their 7.1 Linux client to 7.1.2.0 on RedHat 5? 
When I try to upgrade it I receive the following error:

error: Failed dependencies:
rpmlib(FileDigests) = 4.6.0-1 is needed by 
TIVsm-filepath-7.1.2-0.x86_64
rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) = 5.2-1 is needed by TIVsm-filepath-7.1.2-0.x86_64

Which seems to indicate that the files where build with a higher rpm release 
that the one on RedHat 5...
Thanks for any help in advance!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message.

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286


For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. 
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

Re: Data Protection for Microsoft SQL Server 7.1.2

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi Angela!
I found it on Passport Advantage today, thanks!
The link to the What's New 
(https://www-01.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSTFZR_7.1.2/com.ibm.itsm.db.sql.doc/dps_con_info_whatsnew.html)
 does not show any changes though...
Thanks again for your help!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Angela 
Robertson
Sent: donderdag 16 april 2015 16:39
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Data Protection for Microsoft SQL Server 7.1.2

Hello,

The code will be available for download on Friday, 17 April. The technical is 
being published in advance of code availability so customers have an 
opportunity to see details of what is coming tomorrow. Angela


Angela Robertson
IBM - Storage management and data protection Durham, NC 27703 
aprob...@us.ibm.com


ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 04/16/2015
10:31:41 AM:

 From: Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM eric-van.l...@klm.com
 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Date: 04/16/2015 10:33 AM
 Subject: [ADSM-L] Data Protection for Microsoft SQL Server 7.1.2 Sent 
 by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU

 Hi TSM-ers!
 On the IBM page 
 http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21882505
 I find information about Hardware and Software Requirements:
 Version 4.1.2 FlashCopy(r) Manager for SQL Server  7.1.2 Data 
 Protection for Microsoft SQL Server. However, I cannot find any TDP 
 for SQL Server 7.1.2 code on Passport Advantage, nor on the FTP 
 site... Only a 7.1.1 version.
 Has anybody been able to download this version?
 Thanks in advance for any help.
 Kind regards,
 Eric van Loon
 AF/KLM Storage Engineering
 
 For information, services and offers, please visit our web site:
 http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain 
 confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. 
 If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the 
 e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and 
 that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly 
 prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by 
 error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and 
 delete this message.

 Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/ or 
 its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete 
 transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for 
 any delay in receipt.
 Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal 
 Dutch Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with 
 registered number 33014286
 


For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. 
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

Re: Data Protection for Microsoft SQL Server 7.1.2

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi Zoltan!
The error is a bug in the installer. It doesn't detect that you are already 
running a higher version of the c++ libraries: 
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1IT05016. Just ignore it, like 
you did.
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Zoltan 
Forray
Sent: vrijdag 17 april 2015 15:24
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Data Protection for Microsoft SQL Server 7.1.2

I too found the 7.1.2 updates on Passport and have an issue with the Windows BA 
Client.  I always test it on my Windows 7 workstation first. I self-unzipped 
the installation files and ran the setup.exe from the top-most directory 
(perhaps that is the problem since it kept talking about a Demo?). The 
installer attempts (and fails) to install Microsoft Visual
C++ 2012 SU1 Redistributable (both x86 and x64 versions).  I told it to
continue eventhough both C++ installs failed and it seems to be running ok.

On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 3:50 AM, Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM  
eric-van.l...@klm.com wrote:

 Hi Angela!
 I found it on Passport Advantage today, thanks!
 The link to the What's New (
 https://www-01.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSTFZR_7.1.2/com.ibm.it
 sm.db.sql.doc/dps_con_info_whatsnew.html)
 does not show any changes though...
 Thanks again for your help!
 Kind regards,
 Eric van Loon
 AF/KLM Storage Engineering

 -Original Message-
 From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf 
 Of Angela Robertson
 Sent: donderdag 16 april 2015 16:39
 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Subject: Re: Data Protection for Microsoft SQL Server 7.1.2

 Hello,

 The code will be available for download on Friday, 17 April. The 
 technical is being published in advance of code availability so 
 customers have an opportunity to see details of what is coming 
 tomorrow. Angela

 
 Angela Robertson
 IBM - Storage management and data protection Durham, NC 27703 
 aprob...@us.ibm.com
 

 ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 04/16/2015
 10:31:41 AM:

  From: Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM eric-van.l...@klm.com
  To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
  Date: 04/16/2015 10:33 AM
  Subject: [ADSM-L] Data Protection for Microsoft SQL Server 7.1.2 
  Sent
  by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 
  Hi TSM-ers!
  On the IBM page
  http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21882505
  I find information about Hardware and Software Requirements:
  Version 4.1.2 FlashCopy(r) Manager for SQL Server  7.1.2 Data 
  Protection for Microsoft SQL Server. However, I cannot find any TDP 
  for SQL Server 7.1.2 code on Passport Advantage, nor on the FTP 
  site... Only a 7.1.1 version.
  Has anybody been able to download this version?
  Thanks in advance for any help.
  Kind regards,
  Eric van Loon
  AF/KLM Storage Engineering
  
  For information, services and offers, please visit our web site:
  http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain 
  confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only.
  If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the 
  e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, 
  and that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is 
  strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
  e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
  e-mail, and delete this message.
 
  Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/ 
  or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete 
  transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for 
  any delay in receipt.
  Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal 
  Dutch Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with 
  registered number 33014286
  
 
 
 For information, services and offers, please visit our web site:
 http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain 
 confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. 
 If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the 
 e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and 
 that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly 
 prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by 
 error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this 
 message.

 Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or 
 its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete 
 transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay

Re: Data Protection for Microsoft SQL Server 7.1.2

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi Angela!
Not particularly. I was merely looking if there is a strong reason why we 
should replace 7.1.1 by 7.1.2.
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Angela 
Robertson
Sent: vrijdag 17 april 2015 15:38
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Data Protection for Microsoft SQL Server 7.1.2

Hi -

For Data Protection for Microsoft SQL Server 7.1.2, the updates were focused on 
APARs. If there's a specific item you're hoping to see in Data Protection for 
Microsoft SQL Server 7.1.2, let me know and I can follow up.
Angela

Angela Robertson
IBM - Storage management and data protection Durham, NC 27703 
aprob...@us.ibm.com


ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 04/17/2015
03:50:55 AM:

 From: Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM eric-van.l...@klm.com
 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Date: 04/17/2015 03:53 AM
 Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Data Protection for Microsoft SQL Server 7.1.2 
 Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU

 Hi Angela!
 I found it on Passport Advantage today, thanks!
 The link to the What's New (https://www-01.ibm.com/support/ 
 knowledgecenter/SSTFZR_7.1.2/com.ibm.itsm.db.sql.doc/
 dps_con_info_whatsnew.html) does not show any changes though...
 Thanks again for your help!
 Kind regards,
 Eric van Loon
 AF/KLM Storage Engineering

 -Original Message-
 From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf 
 Of Angela Robertson
 Sent: donderdag 16 april 2015 16:39
 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Subject: Re: Data Protection for Microsoft SQL Server 7.1.2

 Hello,

 The code will be available for download on Friday, 17 April. The 
 technical is being published in advance of code availability so 
 customers have an opportunity to see details of what is coming 
 tomorrow. Angela

 
 Angela Robertson
 IBM - Storage management and data protection Durham, NC 27703 
 aprob...@us.ibm.com
 

 ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 04/16/2015
 10:31:41 AM:

  From: Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM eric-van.l...@klm.com
  To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
  Date: 04/16/2015 10:33 AM
  Subject: [ADSM-L] Data Protection for Microsoft SQL Server 7.1.2 
  Sent
  by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 
  Hi TSM-ers!
  On the IBM page
  http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21882505
  I find information about Hardware and Software Requirements:
  Version 4.1.2 FlashCopy(r) Manager for SQL Server  7.1.2 Data 
  Protection for Microsoft SQL Server. However, I cannot find any TDP 
  for SQL Server 7.1.2 code on Passport Advantage, nor on the FTP 
  site... Only a 7.1.1 version.
  Has anybody been able to download this version?
  Thanks in advance for any help.
  Kind regards,
  Eric van Loon
  AF/KLM Storage Engineering
  
  For information, services and offers, please visit our web site:
  http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain 
  confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only.
  If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the 
  e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, 
  and that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is 
  strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
  e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
  e-mail, and delete this message.
 
  Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/ 
  or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete 
  transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for 
  any delay in receipt.
  Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal 
  Dutch Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with 
  registered number 33014286
  
 
 
 For information, services and offers, please visit our web site:
 http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain 
 confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. 
 If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the 
 e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and 
 that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly 
 prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by 
 error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and 
 delete this message.

 Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/ or 
 its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete 
 transmission

Re: Data Protection for Microsoft SQL Server 7.1.2

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

That was my thought too...
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Zoltan 
Forray
Sent: vrijdag 17 april 2015 16:29
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Data Protection for Microsoft SQL Server 7.1.2

Seriously?  IBM just released 7.1.2 with a known problem that won't be fixed 
until the next release?  I am going to have fun telling my Windows OS folks 
that a newly released  TSM client has a known problem but they can ignore it?

On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM  
eric-van.l...@klm.com wrote:

 Hi Zoltan!
 The error is a bug in the installer. It doesn't detect that you are 
 already running a higher version of the c++ libraries:
 http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1IT05016. Just ignore 
 it, like you did.
 Kind regards,
 Eric van Loon
 AF/KLM Storage Engineering

 -Original Message-
 From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf 
 Of Zoltan Forray
 Sent: vrijdag 17 april 2015 15:24
 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Subject: Re: Data Protection for Microsoft SQL Server 7.1.2

 I too found the 7.1.2 updates on Passport and have an issue with the 
 Windows BA Client.  I always test it on my Windows 7 workstation 
 first. I self-unzipped the installation files and ran the setup.exe 
 from the top-most directory (perhaps that is the problem since it kept 
 talking about a Demo?). The installer attempts (and fails) to install 
 Microsoft Visual
 C++ 2012 SU1 Redistributable (both x86 and x64 versions).  I told it 
 C++ to
 continue eventhough both C++ installs failed and it seems to be running ok.

 On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 3:50 AM, Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM  
 eric-van.l...@klm.com wrote:

  Hi Angela!
  I found it on Passport Advantage today, thanks!
  The link to the What's New (
  https://www-01.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSTFZR_7.1.2/com.ibm.
  it
  sm.db.sql.doc/dps_con_info_whatsnew.html)
  does not show any changes though...
  Thanks again for your help!
  Kind regards,
  Eric van Loon
  AF/KLM Storage Engineering
 
  -Original Message-
  From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On 
  Behalf Of Angela Robertson
  Sent: donderdag 16 april 2015 16:39
  To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
  Subject: Re: Data Protection for Microsoft SQL Server 7.1.2
 
  Hello,
 
  The code will be available for download on Friday, 17 April. The 
  technical is being published in advance of code availability so 
  customers have an opportunity to see details of what is coming 
  tomorrow. Angela
 
  
  Angela Robertson
  IBM - Storage management and data protection Durham, NC 27703 
  aprob...@us.ibm.com
  
 
  ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 04/16/2015
  10:31:41 AM:
 
   From: Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM eric-van.l...@klm.com
   To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
   Date: 04/16/2015 10:33 AM
   Subject: [ADSM-L] Data Protection for Microsoft SQL Server 7.1.2 
   Sent
   by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
  
   Hi TSM-ers!
   On the IBM page
   http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21882505
   I find information about Hardware and Software Requirements:
   Version 4.1.2 FlashCopy(r) Manager for SQL Server  7.1.2 Data 
   Protection for Microsoft SQL Server. However, I cannot find any 
   TDP for SQL Server 7.1.2 code on Passport Advantage, nor on the 
   FTP site... Only a 7.1.1 version.
   Has anybody been able to download this version?
   Thanks in advance for any help.
   Kind regards,
   Eric van Loon
   AF/KLM Storage Engineering
   
   For information, services and offers, please visit our web site:
   http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain 
   confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only.
   If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the 
   e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, 
   and that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is 
   strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received 
   this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by 
   return e-mail, and delete this message.
  
   Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries 
   and/ or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or 
   incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor 
   responsible for any delay in receipt.
   Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal 
   Dutch Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with 
   registered number 33014286
   
  
  
  For information, services and offers, please visit

Data Protection for Microsoft SQL Server 7.1.2

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi TSM-ers!
On the IBM page http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21882505 I 
find information about Hardware and Software Requirements: Version 4.1.2 
FlashCopy(r) Manager for SQL Server  7.1.2 Data Protection for Microsoft SQL 
Server. However, I cannot find any TDP for SQL Server 7.1.2 code on Passport 
Advantage, nor on the FTP site... Only a 7.1.1 version.
Has anybody been able to download this version?
Thanks in advance for any help.
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message.

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

Delete object

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi guys!
In the TSM  5.x days I used the delete object command to remove individual 
files from a TSM server. I used this in case I could not delete all data for a 
client, for instance where a database was removed from a client without 
deleting the data from TSM first. In this case tdposync won't help you no more. 
But now (in TSM 6.x) it's no longer working:

tsm: Server1delete object 5997365783
Object 0.1702398487 is not defined.
ANS8001I Return code 11.

Has anybody found a solution to delete individual files on a version 6 server?
Thanks in advance for any help!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message.

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

Linux permissions not restored

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi guys!
Yesterday someone accidentally changed permissions on one of our Lotus Notes 
servers. A new backup was made yesterday evening, but we cannot restore the 
file with the old permissions. The client shows only one active file in TSM 
(backup date 05/17/2013) and when this one is restored the permissions are the 
same as today.
The file looked like this the day before yesterday:
-r-sr-xr-x 1 root bin 9092 Sep 16 2011 
/app/LOTUSDOMINO/groupware/bin/slg14gpw/lotus/notes/85030/linux/bindsock
This is the file after the restore:
-r-xr-xr-x 1 slg12gpw dominoadm 9092 Sep 16 2011 
/app/LOTUSDOMINO/groupware/bin/slg12gpw/lotus/notes/85030/linux/bindsock
Why isn't it possible to restore the right permissions, even with the pitdate 
parameter? And why do I only see one file in TSM? I would expect two (one with 
the old permissions and one with the new)...
Thanks for any help in advance!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message.

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

Re: Linux permissions not restored

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Thanks Andy and Zoltan for your reply!
Indeed this makes TSM not suitable for rolling back security errors. In fact, 
when you change security attributes you won't be able to recover your system to 
anything but the last backup state. No more point-in-time. Ok yes, you can 
restore your files back to a point in time, but your server isn't, because of 
the incorrect permissions.
Personally if find this a flaw of the product...
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Andrew 
Raibeck
Sent: donderdag 12 maart 2015 15:38
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Linux permissions not restored

Hi Eric,

On UNIX and Linux systems, if only file permissions have changed, then the 
latest backup copy is updated with the changed permissions; it is not backed up 
again in full.

From the online documentation at
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSGSG7_7.1.1/com.ibm.itsm.client.doc/c_bac_fullpart.html:

Files are backed up when any of the following attributes change:
   * File size
   * Date or time of last modification
   * Extended Attributes
   * Access Control List

If only the following attributes change, the attributes are updated on the 
Tivoli Storage Manager server, but the file is not backed up:
   * File owner
   * File permissions == This one
   * Inode
   * Group ID
   * Change time (ctime) attribute. See the updatectime option for details.
   (AIX and Linux only)
   * Icon location (Mac OS X only)
   * Type or creator (Mac OS X only)

Best regards,

- Andy



Andrew Raibeck | Tivoli Storage Manager Level 3 Technical Lead | 
stor...@us.ibm.com

IBM Tivoli Storage Manager links:
Product support:
http://www.ibm.com/support/entry/portal/Overview/Software/Tivoli/Tivoli_Storage_Manager

Online documentation:
http://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSGSG7/welcome
Product Wiki:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/wikis/home/wiki/Tivoli%20Storage%20Manager

ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 2015-03-12
10:25:47:

 From: Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM eric-van.l...@klm.com
 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Date: 2015-03-12 10:26
 Subject: Linux permissions not restored Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor 
 Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU

 Hi guys!
 Yesterday someone accidentally changed permissions on one of our Lotus 
 Notes servers. A new backup was made yesterday evening, but we cannot 
 restore the file with the old permissions. The client shows only one 
 active file in TSM (backup date 05/17/2013) and when this one is 
 restored the permissions are the same as today.
 The file looked like this the day before yesterday:
 -r-sr-xr-x 1 root bin 9092 Sep 16 2011 /app/LOTUSDOMINO/groupware/ 
 bin/slg14gpw/lotus/notes/85030/linux/bindsock
 This is the file after the restore:
 -r-xr-xr-x 1 slg12gpw dominoadm 9092 Sep 16 2011 /app/LOTUSDOMINO/ 
 groupware/bin/slg12gpw/lotus/notes/85030/linux/bindsock
 Why isn't it possible to restore the right permissions, even with the 
 pitdate parameter? And why do I only see one file in TSM? I would 
 expect two (one with the old permissions and one with the new)...
 Thanks for any help in advance!
 Kind regards,
 Eric van Loon
 AF/KLM Storage Engineering
 
 For information, services and offers, please visit our web site:
 http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain 
 confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. 
 If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the 
 e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and 
 that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly 
 prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by 
 error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and 
 delete this message.

 Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/ or 
 its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete 
 transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for 
 any delay in receipt.
 Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal 
 Dutch Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with 
 registered number 33014286
 


For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please

Re: 5.5 LANfree together with a 7.1 server

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi Karel!
That doesn't sound very promising... I can't upgrade the storage agents because 
5.5 is the highest level available for RHEL4...
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Karel 
Bos
Sent: woensdag 4 maart 2015 6:48
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: 5.5 LANfree together with a 7.1 server

Hi,

I have had a v 6.2.4.0 sta from an  Exchange farm that stopped doing lan free 
backups after upgrade the tsm aerver and lib manager to v 6.3.4.x while all 
others kept on running.

After logging a call with IBM got told I had to upgrade the failing sta to the 
same level as the servers. Even though the config I had was supported it 
sometimes just doesn't work or stops working they told me.

After this wonderful answer I make sure the sta's can be upgraded to the same 
lvl if needed.

Kind regards,

Karel
Op 3 mrt. 2015 15:09 schreef Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM 
eric-van.l...@klm.com:

 Hi guys!
 We have several RedHat 4.x LANfree clients (TSM StorageAgent 5.5.4.0 
 and lin_tape 1.66), currently using a TSM 6.2.6 server for the mounts. 
 Since
 6.2 will be out of support very soon we need to upgrade to 7.1.
 Is anybody successfully using the 5.5 Linux StorageAgent in 
 combination with a TSM 7.1 server?
 Thanks for any reply in advance!
 Kind regards,
 Eric van Loon
 AF/KLM Storage Engineering
 
 For information, services and offers, please visit our web site:
 http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain 
 confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. 
 If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the 
 e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and 
 that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly 
 prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by 
 error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this 
 message.

 Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or 
 its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete 
 transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay 
 in receipt.
 Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal 
 Dutch
 Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with 
 registered number 33014286
 


For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. 
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

5.5 LANfree together with a 7.1 server

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi guys!
We have several RedHat 4.x LANfree clients (TSM StorageAgent 5.5.4.0 and 
lin_tape 1.66), currently using a TSM 6.2.6 server for the mounts. Since 6.2 
will be out of support very soon we need to upgrade to 7.1.
Is anybody successfully using the 5.5 Linux StorageAgent in combination with a 
TSM 7.1 server?
Thanks for any reply in advance!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message.

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

re-adding (virtual) tape drives in Linux

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi TSM-ers!
I'm still struggling with a few LANFree clients on Linux which cannot mount 
tapes. I would like to remove the drives on them and re-add them afterwards. I 
know how to do this in AIX (rmdev followed by a cfgmgr) but I cannot find 
instructions on how to do this on Linux. All manuals talk about installing 
lin_tape and poof, the drives are there. But what if you want to redefine them 
for some reason?
Thanks again for your help!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message.

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

[pvrAcquireSharedMountPoint]:rc=15 from libmanager=QVIP2

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi guys!
I have an ancient Linux node (RHEL4) running an unsupported (but latest) 
lin_tape 1.66 and an also unsupported (but latest) TSM 5.5.4. LANfree backup 
doesn't work anymore, but I can't find the reason why. Since the whole stack is 
out of support there is no sense in opening a PMR...
I started a trace to see why the client cannot mount tapes, here is a piece of 
the output:

12:27:55.323 [29][output.c][6404][PutConsoleMsg]:ANR0408I Session 27 started 
for server QVIP2 (Linux/x86_64) (Tcp/Ip) for library sharing. ~
12:27:55.342 [29][output.c][6404][PutConsoleMsg]:ANR0409I Session 27 ended for 
server QVIP2 (Linux/x86_64).~
12:27:55.342 [29][pvrmp.c][1203][pvrAcquireSharedMountPoint]:rc=15 from 
libmanager=QVIP2.
12:27:55.342 [29][output.c][6404][PutConsoleMsg]:ANR0535W Transaction failed 
for session 25 for node QVIPBDV2 (Linux86) - insufficient mount points 
available to satisfy the request.~

Does anybody know where to find what RC=15 means? There are no additional 
messages on the server other than the ANR0535W itself.
Thanks for any help in advance!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message.

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

Re: [pvrAcquireSharedMountPoint]:rc=15 from libmanager=QVIP2

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi Mike!
I also created a server trace and although the messages in it are almost 
identical as in the technote, the paths are defined on the server and they are 
online... They have been working until recently by the way.
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Ryder, 
Michael S
Sent: vrijdag 20 februari 2015 15:44
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [pvrAcquireSharedMountPoint]:rc=15 from libmanager=QVIP2

Hi Eric:

On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 9:34 AM, Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM  
eric-van.l...@klm.com wrote:

 means? There are no additional messages on the server other than the 
 ANR0535W


This seems to be related:
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21328476

Best regards,

Mike, x7942
RMD IT Client Services

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. 
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

Re: [pvrAcquireSharedMountPoint]:rc=15 from libmanager=QVIP2

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi Andrew!
I receive a 404 error when clicking the link down below. Maybe it's only 
available internally?
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Andrew 
Galloway
Sent: vrijdag 20 februari 2015 15:51
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [pvrAcquireSharedMountPoint]:rc=15 from libmanager=QVIP2

This might be of help as well.
 
www.urz.uni-heidelberg.de/UnixCluster/Hinweise/Hilfe/.../anrcms50.pdf
 
 
 


 Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM eric-van.l...@klm.com 2015-02-20 9:34 AM 
Hi guys!
I have an ancient Linux node (RHEL4) running an unsupported (but latest) 
lin_tape 1.66 and an also unsupported (but latest) TSM 5.5.4. LANfree backup 
doesn't work anymore, but I can't find the reason why. Since the whole stack is 
out of support there is no sense in opening a PMR...
I started a trace to see why the client cannot mount tapes, here is a piece of 
the output:

12:27:55.323 [29][output.c][6404][PutConsoleMsg]:ANR0408I Session 27 started 
for server QVIP2 (Linux/x86_64) (Tcp/Ip) for library sharing. ~
12:27:55.342 [29][output.c][6404][PutConsoleMsg]:ANR0409I Session 27 ended for 
server QVIP2 (Linux/x86_64).~
12:27:55.342 [29][pvrmp.c][1203][pvrAcquireSharedMountPoint]:rc=15 from 
libmanager=QVIP2.
12:27:55.342 [29][output.c][6404][PutConsoleMsg]:ANR0535W Transaction failed 
for session 25 for node QVIPBDV2 (Linux86) - insufficient mount points 
available to satisfy the request.~

Does anybody know where to find what RC=15 means? There are no additional 
messages on the server other than the ANR0535W itself.
Thanks for any help in advance!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message.

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286


For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. 
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

archive and directory management class

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi guys!
I have hardly used the archive command myself but one of my customers now tries 
to archive some data for 5 years. He specifies the -archmc= commandline 
parameter and all files are correctly bound to the 5 years management class. 
The directories however are bound to the default management class (14 days). I 
know about the dirmc parameter, but this can only be added to the option file, 
it's not a valid commandline parameter. How does this work? I don't want to 
include the dirmc in the option file because we only want the 5 year retention 
once for this specific archive...
Thanks for your help in advance!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering


For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message.

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

SQL for highest volume label in library

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi TSM-ers!
Does anybody know a SQL statement to retrieve the highest volume label of all 
tapes in a library? Is it possible with one single SQL query?
Thanks for any help in advance!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering


For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message.

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

Re: SQL for highest volume label in library

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Skylar, Thomas and David!
This was exactly what I was looking for. Thank you VERY much!!!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Skylar 
Thompson
Sent: donderdag 11 december 2014 16:45
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: SQL for highest volume label in library

It depends on what you mean by highest, but assuming you mean lexigraphically 
highest, this would work:

SELECT MAX(volume_name) FROM libvolumes WHERE library_name='foo'

On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 03:41:23PM +, Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM wrote:
 Hi TSM-ers!
 Does anybody know a SQL statement to retrieve the highest volume label of all 
 tapes in a library? Is it possible with one single SQL query?
 Thanks for any help in advance!

--
-- Skylar Thompson (skyl...@u.washington.edu)
-- Genome Sciences Department, System Administrator
-- Foege Building S046, (206)-685-7354
-- University of Washington School of Medicine

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. 
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286

Re: Weird SQL output

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi Andy and others!
Thank you all for your help!
This would be the easiest way then:

SELECT volume_name FROM libvolumes WHERE status='Private' AND volume_name NOT 
IN (SELECT volume_name FROM volumes) and volume_name not in (select volume_name 
from volhistory where type like 'BACKUP%')

You select all private volumes libvols which are not in the volume list and 
(according to the volhist) not used for a BACKUPSET, BACKUPINC or BACKUPFULL.
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Efim
Sent: vrijdag 21 november 2014 17:41
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Weird SQL output

Erik,
I can't believe that you're never checkin private tapes.
After checked in last_use is NULL. It is not an issue. It just tell that nobody 
use this tape after it checked in.
also don't forget about last_use='DbBackup'
so I think:

Total private tapes = tapes with last_use='Data' + tapes with 
last_use='DbBackup' +  tapes with last_use is NULL but present in volumes table 
 + tapes with last_use is NULL but with type=Backupset (select volume_name from 
volhistory where type='BACKUPSET')

Efim

2014-11-21 16:02 GMT+03:00 Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM eric-van.l...@klm.com:
 Hi Efim!
 Since we don't checkout tapes it won't be an issue for us. Apart from that, 
 it still doesn't explain why the total of last_use='Data' and 
 last_use!='Data' is not equal to the output from the query with no last_used 
 specified.
 As to your query: I found this one online too, but it's not always reliable, 
 especially when you create backupsets. They are not in a q volume list but 
 they are not scratch. I think this query is usefull when you somehow include 
 the volume history which does contain the backupset volumes.
 Kind regards,
 Eric van Loon
 AF/KLM Storage Engineering


 -Original Message-
 From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf 
 Of Efim
 Sent: vrijdag 21 november 2014 13:41
 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Subject: Re: Weird SQL output

 Hi,
 Select with last_use = ‘Data’ is not correct. If you checkout and when 
 checkin tapes the parameter last_use can be lost.
 If you want to check private tapes without the data, try to use select like 
 this:

 select volume_name from libvolumes where status='Private' and last_use 
 is NULL and volume_name not in (select volume_name from volumes)

 Efim

 2014-11-21 12:16 GMT+03:00 Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM 
 eric-van.l...@klm.com:
 Hi guys!
 I have some weird output from one of my SQL statements. Here it's is:

 select count(*) from libvolumes where status='Private'
   Unnamed[1]
 
 3698

 Ok, so 3698 private volumes on this server. Now, how many contain data:

 select count(*) from libvolumes where status='Private' and last_use = 'Data'
   Unnamed[1]
 
 1011

 Right, I know a lot of tapes do not have a value in the Last Use column (my 
 guess it is that these are tapes created by SAN clients), so how many are 
 there:

 select count(*) from libvolumes where status='Private' and last_use != 'Data'
   Unnamed[1]
 
0

 Huh? There should be 3698-1011=2687! Last_use is empty then?

 select count(*) from libvolumes where status='Private' and last_use=NULL
   Unnamed[1]
 
0

 I'm lost here... I'm I doing something wrong? The total of last_use='Data' 
 and last_use!='Data' should be the same as the output from the query with no 
 last_used specified, right?
 Thanks for any help in advance!
 Kind regards,
 Eric van Loon

 
 For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
 http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential 
 and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
 addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may 
 be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to 
 this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If 
 you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately 
 by return e-mail, and delete this message.

 Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
 employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission 
 of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
 Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal 
 Dutch Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with 
 registered number 33014286
 



 --
 Efim
 
 For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
 http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential 
 and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you

Re: Cristie BMR vs Tivoli Fastback for BMR

[Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM]

Hi TSM-ers!
Thank you all for your helpful replies to my question. It saved me a of 
research!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering 

For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. 
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286