Re: truncated while reading in Shared Static mode

2001-03-02 Thread Mearl Danner

We have the same problem with the 3.7 and 4.1 clients. If you take note the
files are backed up every time. Whether they've been changed has no bearing. I
've restored the files to another server and they seem to be undamaged. The
Macs can read them fine.

In our case the files are Macintosh namespace files. This from Tivoli support:

I have generated an APAR IC29695 to address this.
   TSM NETWARE CLIENT 3.7 AND 4.1.1 GIVES ERROR DURING BACKUP:
   TRUNCATED WHILE READING IN SHARED STATIC MODE

The fix is not available yet. We have reverted to the 3.1 client.


BTW. Please don't post in html format. I detest having to open my email
client and browser both to read email.


On Thu, 1 Mar 2001 15:52:36 -0500 "Lorrie J. Marnell" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I am using ADSM to backup Netware 5.1 servers.  I am seeing the message
 truncated while reading in Shared Static mode in my dsmerror.log file and
 have not been able to find any information in the achieves regarding it.

 Can someone tell me if this is something I should be concerned with?

-----
Mearl Danner
Systems Programmer
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Samford University



Re: Netware 5.6 SunOS 5.6

2001-02-22 Thread Mearl Danner

Current supported releases of Netware are:

Netware 5.0 with the latest service pack being 6A.
Netware 5.1 service pack 2A.

On Thu, 22 Feb 2001 12:14:33 -0300 Alexandre Bicas Caldeira
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi guys,

 Does anyone know if TSM is compatible with Novell Netware 5.6 and Sun Os 5.6
 ?!

 When I was looking for it at Tivoli site, I found out that one of TSM
 requirements is Netware 5.1 but the site didn't mention other versions above
 5.1 ...

 Thanks all
 ___
 Alexandre Bicas Caldeira - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Tivoli Certified Specialist - Tivoli Storage Manager
 Service IT Solutions - http://www.service.com.br
Sao Paulo:(11) 3040-1960
Rua Helena, 280, Cj 1106
CEP 04552-050 - Sco Paulo - SP
  Porto Alegre:   (51) 212-3666
 Curitiba:   (41) 262-8320

-
Mearl Danner
Systems Programmer
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Samford University



Re: Novell DS issue?

2001-02-06 Thread Mearl Danner

We run DS8.61 on a 5.1 and a 5.0 server. The only issues we have are the
Netware 5.1 license objects will not backup, but Novell assures us that this is
"working as designed".

If you can be more specific, perhaps we can be more helpful.


On Tue, 6 Feb 2001 10:22:48 -0500 Jim Kirkman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Greetings,

 We've got a Netware 5.1 server that's been a real problem child. The
 Netware Admin is curious if anyone is aware of problems with ADSM and
 version 7.44 of the Netware DS. This is evidently an older version of DS
 and he wants some evidence to back up his theory.

 I've applied the latest tsa modules and am running the 3.7.1_7 client.

 tia

 --
 Jim Kirkman
 AIS - Systems
 UNC-Chapel Hill
 966-5884

-----
Mearl Danner
Systems Programmer
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Samford University



Re: Netware restore problem

2001-01-30 Thread Mearl Danner

Is he backing up from his workstation? If so, all the client sees is a mapped
drive. As far as I know, the file sytem rights of the client platform are
backed up. The TSM client (Windows, I assume) knows nothing about the Novell
trustee rights - except that he can see the files. He thinks he's backing up a
local Windows drive.

IMHO he should not be backing up mapped drives from a workstation. If your
operation is as ours that would be redundant. We do incrementals of our servers
(from the server) every night and all files are backed up with complete trustee
information. If we restore them from the server all the rights will appear the
next time he logs in his workstation.

On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 08:57:24 -0500 Jeff T [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I have a netware user who wants to use our TSM server for file backup.  I
 gave him the software and he has been tesing it.

 He claims that the trustee rights for NDS file objects are not being
 preserved on restore.
 Is there a way to ovecome this?

 I have limited netware knowledge so I'm in a bad position here.  What do I
 tell him?


  Jeff Toth
  FAA

-
Mearl Danner
Systems Programmer
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Samford University



Re: restoring on novell server

2001-01-10 Thread Mearl Danner

There appears to be space between the "." and the closing quote in the error
message. Is it possible that there is an unprintable character after the "."? I
can't create a file with a trailing dot (Windows Me and long namespace) unless
I put something other than a space after it. It could be a language codeset
issue. Perhaps a European character that is not understandable by Novell with
the installed codeset?

On Wed, 10 Jan 2001 11:53:46 +0100 Ernst Jeschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 The Problem results not from the quota. The problem comes from the dot at
 the end of the directoryname.

 kind regards
 joachim langitz, ernst jeschek


---------
Mearl Danner
Systems Programmer
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Samford University



Re: Netware Client abends

2000-12-20 Thread Mearl Danner

Since you can isolate it to a specific area there must be some corruption in 
the filesystem.

Can you schedule a time to dismount the volume and run a Vrepair? If it shows 
no errors or does not correct the problem, you'll need to get the full abend 
message from the abend log (which includes the stack trace and loaded modules) 
and post it on the Netware 5 abend news forum. The nntp server is 
support-forums.novell.com. I haven't noticed any similar posts on the forums, 
but I don't believe it is a TSM issue specifically. The Novell Sysops can be 
very helpful in situations like this.



On Wed, 20 Dec 2000 12:11:23 -0500 David Longo [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 We have the following config:
 
 TSM Server 3.7.4.0 on AIX 4.3.3
 
 Netware Client 4.1.0.0 on Netware 5.0 SP5
 Hardware:  
 IBM Netfinity 7000, model 8651-RM0
 768 MB RAM
 IBM ServeRAID II, 6 - 9GB HD's, RAID5 w/HS
 
 We Use TCPIP commmethod.
 
 Partial output of VOLUME command:
 Mounted Volumes  Name Spaces Flags
 SYS   DOS, LONGCp Sa
 VOL1 DOS, MAC, NFS, LONG NSS
 
 This client was on 3.7.2.11 of TSM and had the same problem.
 
 Doing an INC backup on a daily prompted schedule it will abend about every 2nd or 
3rd day.  Below is one of the Abend log entries.  The abend is always the same.  I am 
fairly new here and have started working out existing problems, like this one.
 
 This Client is working as a file server.  It is backing up VOL1:/users when it 
abends.  It appears to always to abend in the S or T area (User names 
alphabetically).  At this point it has examined about 400,000 files.
 
 I did a SEL backup with just one users directory that seemd to have a problem.  It 
abended after about 7,000 files as follows:
 
¯--
 Normal File  - 10,278,912  
VOL1:/Users/TSANDERS/remdrept/RemedyLinkForPalm/Setup/Remedy/PalmLink/aix/remlink.tar 
[Sent]
 
 (TSA500.NLM  5.3  313) A file cannot be read.
 
 ¯
 
 I then did a SEL narrowing directory path smaller and it worked without error.  I 
did search of Tivoli Knowledge Base on TSA500 and several other searches and one 
TSA500 entry was sort of like ours but solution we have already implemented.
 
 A disk scan has been done by our Netware Admin and had no problem.  We have other 
Netware boxes with 3.1 amd 3.7 clients and they work without error.
 
 Anyone have any ideas/suggestions?
 
 ABEND LOG
 ***
 Server HFIT halted Friday, December 8, 2000  10:54:37 pm
 Abend 1 on P00: Server-5.00i: Page Fault Processor Exception (Error code )
 
 Registers:
 CS = 0008 DS = 0010 ES = 0010 FS = 0010 GS = 0010 SS = 0010
 EAX =  EBX = C83E87D4 ECX = 0003 EDX = C83E8900
 ESI = C83E894C EDI =  EBP = C83E87D0 ESP = C83E86C4
 EIP = D17FB830 FLAGS = 00014256 
 D17FB830 8B4058 MOV EAX,[EAX+58]=?
 EIP in FILESYS.NLM at code start +0004B830h
 Access Location: 0x0058
 
 The violation occurred while processing the following instruction:
 D17FB830 8B4058 MOV EAX,[EAX+58]
 D17FB833 81E1FF00   AND ECX,00FF
 -
 End of file. [SYS:SYSTEM\ABEND.LOG]
 *
 
 
 
 David B. Longo
 Systems Administrator
 Health First, Inc. I/T
 3300 Fiske Blvd.
 Rockledge, FL 32955-4305
 PH  321.434.5536
 Pager  321.634.8230
 Fax:321.434.5525
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
Mearl Danner
Data Communications/Network Specialist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Samford University



Re: NetWare Client abends

2000-12-20 Thread Mearl Danner

We have a PMR opened with Tivoli related to backing up Mac files. The 4.1 and
3.7 clients back them up every time, even though they haven't changed. It
hasn't caused an abend yet. We back revved to a 3.1 client till we can get an
answer.


On Wed, 20 Dec 2000 09:43:53 -0800 "Tomblin, David"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 If you do not need the Macintosh file space, remove it with vrepair.  That
 file space doubles the NetWare directory space needed and it has caused
 similar problem for us.
 Dave T

 -
-----
Mearl Danner
Data Communications/Network Specialist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Samford University



Re: Restore Throughput

2000-12-18 Thread Mearl Danner

Last we did was two years ago. This was shortly after we started uing ADSM so
the data on the tapes was not very fragmented.

Netware 4.11 on a Compaq 2500 with an Adaptec 2944 attached to EMC external
array. The client was 3.1 and also the server (running on an RS6000 - 7011 I
believe, and 8mm drives).

We restored 18 gig in about 6 hours to newly configured drives.

We've recently migrated to a 3.7 server (RS6000-7043, with STK 9840's). We get
over 4 gig per hour on backups wit 3.7 clients.



On Mon, 18 Dec 2000 13:53:54 -0500 Louis Wiesemann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 I'm just looking for any guesstimates anyone might have for the throughput we
might "expect" to see restoring a Netware 3.1.08 client with a TSM 3.7.3.0
OS/390 server.  This is over a 100M ethernet with 3490 tape robot on the
server.  We have split the restore up over 4 sessions and have disabled any
other TSM processing while we run the restore.

 We are seeing about 1.2G an hour actual data being restored.  Can anyone say
whether this is about what we should expect?  I have been in contact with
Tivoli and tuned the client and server options per their instructions.  I was
wondering if anyone had any idea if this seems a reasonable rate.

 Thanks for any input.




 Louis J. Wiesemann 502-852-8952




 The "Daily Word For Reflection" is a free service and a non-discussion
 list intended primarily to allow personal reflection on the Word of God.

 SUBSCRIBE/UNSUBSCRIBE at:

http://monica.cin.org:81/guest/RemoteListSummary/daily_word
 

---------
Mearl Danner
Data Communications/Network Specialist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Samford University



Re: How do I get off of the adsm list? Does anybody know?

2000-12-11 Thread Mearl Danner

From the confirmation when I joined.

You may leave the list at any  time by sending a "SIGNOFF ADSM-L" command
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (or [EMAIL PROTECTED]).

Proobably without the quotes nad as the body of the message. Sometimes it seems
best to make the command the ONLY text in the body.

On Mon, 11 Dec 2000 13:38:43 -0800 "Pomplun, Richard"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I believe you have to send an e-mail
 and in the body it has to say unsubscribe

 -Original Message-
 From: Jimenez, Juan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 1:31 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: How do I get off of the adsm list? Does anybody know?
 Importance: High


 Juan E.  Jimenez
 Sheriff's Technical Services Division
 (909) 387-0658

---------
Mearl Danner
Data Communications/Network Specialist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Samford University