Re: firmware robot magstar3575L32

[Rafael Mendez]

Hi there,
Eric, I have been talking to my HW colleagues and they have told me that, microcode is 
updated allways as Richard mentioned.
Also, I do not even see a microchip replacement in order to update microcode.

So, I think that, the best way is to call directly to IBM HW representative.

Regards,
Rafael
---
to: "Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
date: 3/14/2003 11:10:47 AM
subject: Re: firmware robot magstar3575L32



> Hi Richard!

> Bare in mind that Michelle wants here library microcode upgraded, not the

> drive microcode, which indeed can be done from the host or directly from a

> CE tape.

> Also, one cannot really call a 3575 a modern library, can you? ;-)

> Kindest regards,

> Eric van Loon

> KLM Royal Dutch Airlines

>

>

> -Original Message-

> From: Richard Sims [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

> Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 16:58

> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> Subject: Re: firmware robot magstar3575L32

>

>

> >You will not find it anywhere. The library microcode is on a chip on the

> >control board inside your library. The only way to have your library

> >microcode upgraded is by placing a service call at IBM. They will come and

> >place a new chip in your library. I have had it done here, it takes about

> 30

> >minutes.

>

> My gullibility meter just went off the scale...

> I don't know of any modern library or like device where a CE arrives and

> replaces a chip to upgrade microcode.  When they do it, its via an FMR

> (Field

> Microcode Replacement) tape, as the 3575 manuals describe.  But that's the

> hand-carry method: microcode can also be installed from a host file, as

> through

> OS commands, or utilities like the 'tapeutil' command...in its Tape Drive

> Service

> Aids section, Microcode Load (Download microcode from a host file or

> diskette to

> tape device via SCSI bus).  It's not always something that the customer

> customarily does, but can certainly be done.  In any case, your CE should be

> showing up whenever your library is ripe for a microcode update, to

> volunteer

> to do the deed for you: you should not have to explore for the way to do

> this.

> Call IBM Service and talk to them about this.

>

>   Richard Sims, BU

>

>

> **

> For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: http://www.klm.com. 
> This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged material 
> intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that 
> no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and 
> that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, 
> and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the 
> sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart 
> Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for 
> the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor 
> responsible for any delay in receipt.

> **

>


___
Obtin gratis tu cuenta de correo en StarMedia Email. !Regmstrate hoy mismo!. 
http://www.starmedia.com/email

BRMS and TSM reports different amount of data

[Rafael Mendez]

Hi TMS'ers,
I hope someone outhere could help us with this problem.
Our customer has TSM server 4.1.5 on windows NT.
AS/400 client backing up via BRMS.

The problem is, BRMS reports an amount of data backed up (for example 2 Gb) and TSM 
resports an amount "completelty different" (for example 12 Gb for the same backed up 
data). The problem does not appears allways, it is ramdom problem.

Does anybody has experienced this before?.
Any idea would be appreciated.

Thanks in advance for your help.

Rafael
Madrid-Spain






___
Obtin gratis tu cuenta de correo en StarMedia Email. !Regmstrate hoy mismo!. 
http://www.starmedia.com/email

Re: Sizing of Bufpoolsize

[Rafael Mendez]

Hi Arnaud,
Take a look on "TSM performance Tuning Guide".
On that manual, you could find the following:
"Recommendations for AIX, HP, Sun, NT, OS/2 Servers
System Memory (MB)  Recommended BuffPoolSize(MB)  RBufferPoolSize (KB)
   32   22048
   48  3 3072
   64  4 4096
   96  9 9216
 1281414336
 1602020480
 2563232768
 51264 65536
   1024   128   131072
   2048   256   262144

Hope this helps,
Rafael

-- Mensaje original --
to: PAC Brion Arnaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
date: 1/17/2003 10:04:32 AM
subject: Sizing  of Bufpoolsize



> Hi *SM fellows,

>

> I'm running TSM 4.2.3.1 on an AIX 4.3.3 system (IBM 6h0) with 2 GB ram, the db size 
>is 21 GB, 75 % used, the logpool size is 12 GB. Since 3 weeks (when we upgraded from 
>4.2.1.15), I get massive performance degradation : expire inventory takes ages 
>(approx 20 hours) to go through 9 million objects, and cache hit ratio is between 94 
>and 96 %. I tried to increase my bufpoolsize from 151 MB to 400 in several 100 GB 
>steps without seeing any improvement, and the system  is now heavily paging.

> Could you please share your bufpoolsize settings with me, if working in the same 
>kind of environment, or give me some advice for tuning the server ?

> Thanks in advance !

>

> Arnaud

>

> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

> | Arnaud Brion, Panalpina Management Ltd., IT Group |

> | Viaduktstrasse 42, P.O. Box, 4002 Basel - Switzerland |

> | Phone:  41 61 226 19 78 / Fax:  41 61 226 17 01   |

> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

>


___
Obtin gratis tu cuenta de correo en StarMedia Email. !Regmstrate hoy mismo!. 
http://www.starmedia.com/email

Re: help：define automated drive question

[Rafael Mendez]

Hi,
Take a look of TSM Device support in IBM support site (you have to be registered to 
have full access).
I think you are not using the element numbers defined for your type of library.
I have found the following in IBM support site for ADIC 1000 library.
Tape drive 1 (element 800)  __
Tape drive 2 (element 801)  __
Tape drive 3 (element 802)  __
Tape drive 4 (element 803)  __
Tape drive 5 (element 804)  __
Tape drive 6 (element 805)  __
Tape drive 7 (element 806)  __
Tape drive 8 (element 807)  __
Tape drive 9 (element 808)  __
Tape drive 10 (element 809)  __
Tape drive 11 (element 810)  __
Tape drive 12 (element 811)  __


Hopes this helps,
Rafael
---
to: fenglimian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
date: 1/9/2003 1:49:57 AM
subject: =?GB2312?Q?help=A3=BAdefine automated drive question?=



> Hi all#:

>Today I tried to configure a TSM server!#My lib is ADIC scalar 1000 and has two 
>driver#(the elements are 1200#,1201#,I had already made the two drives as TSM 
>tape#,devices name are /dev/mt0!"/dev/mt1#)#,after I had defined my autolib#,then I 
>tried to define the drives#,everytime I used the follow options:

> library name :libname

> drive name:drv1

> device:/dev/mt0

> element:1200

> the output is:Invalid value for ELEMENT parameter.About five months ago,I had done 
>the same thing ,every thing is sucessful,what's the problem?

>

>

> fenglimian

> [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> 2003-01-09

>


___
Obtin gratis tu cuenta de correo en StarMedia Email. !Regmstrate hoy mismo!. 
http://www.starmedia.com/email

Re: Tivoli Manual are now on IBM.com

[Rafael Mendez]

Come on people Do not use the list if you have problems with your browser. :-(
I do not have problems reaching the manuals and if you have problems, TRY using 
another browser.
If you have real problems, open a COMPLAINT with IBM people.
Sorry for sending this message to all the list but I do not want to get more messages 
telling ."this is poor this sucks... blablablabla".

Rafael
-- Mensaje original --
to: John Naylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
date: 11/13/2002 6:43:06 AM
subject: Re: Tivoli Manual are now on IBM.com



> I agree.

> This is poor

>

>

>

>

> Michelle Wiedeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 11/13/2002 09:29:33 AM

>

> Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

>

> To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> cc:(bcc: John Naylor/HAV/SSE)

> Subject:  Re: Tivoli Manual are now on IBM.com

>

>

>

> The page cannot be displayed.

> typical.

>

> -Original Message-

> From: Luis Nevarez [mailto:lnevarez@;US.IBM.COM]

> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 5:30 PM

> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> Subject: Tivoli Manual are now on IBM.com

>

>

> The Tivoli manuals are now listed under Library on the left Nav bar..

> These manuals are still available for free to Tivoli users.

>

> http://submit.boulder.ibm.com/tividd/td/tdprodlist.html

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> **

> The information in this E-Mail is confidential and may be legally

> privileged. It may not represent the views of Scottish and Southern

> Energy plc.

> It is intended solely for the addressees. Access to this E-Mail by

> anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient,

> any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted

> to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.

> Any unauthorised recipient should advise the sender immediately of

> the error in transmission.

>

> Scottish Hydro-Electric, Southern Electric, SWALEC and S S

> are trading names of the Scottish and Southern Energy Group.

> **

>


___
Obtin gratis tu cuenta de correo en StarMedia Email. !Regmstrate hoy mismo!. 
http://www.starmedia.com/email

Re: Oracle and TDP issues

[Rafael Mendez]

Hi Zoltan,
I am not Oracle expert too but I think I can give you some clue.
Like you should know, in Oracle 8i RMAN appeared replacing to EBU (Enterprise Backup 
Utility). So, In your case, you have to install EBU (if my mind still works, I think 
the last EBU version was 2.2) which is included with Oracle 7.x.
Actually, TDP for Oracle does not support Oracle 7.x versions and, as far as I know, 
EBU is also out of support from Oracle side.

Anyway, I suggest you to register into Oracle site and search for EBU support.

Regards,
Rafael
-- Mensaje original --
to: Zoltan Forray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
date: 10/22/2002 11:06:52 AM
subject: Oracle and TDP issues



> We just purchased the TSM TDP for Oracle on NT/2K.

>

> We installed it, only to realize it won't work since there is no sign of

> RMAN.EXE on this machine?

>

> So, the owner of this box/package contacts the vendor. Their response

> was"Oracle is version 7.3.4, not 8i or 9i, which will not run with their

> app.  said the person she spoke to did not seem to know what RMAN

> was."

>

> So, how does one backup an Oracle app/database, using the TDP without RMAN

> ?

>

> I am not an Oracle person but even I know that RMAN is the utility to do

> database backup/restore/maintenance !

>

> Suggestions, anyone ?

>


___
Obtin gratis tu cuenta de correo en StarMedia Email. !Regmstrate hoy mismo!. 
http://www.starmedia.com/email

Re: TSM: DB Best Practises ?

[Rafael Mendez]

Hi Riaan,
I would like to share with you my experience here. I have seen how people 
administering TSM server forget how important is to have planned the AUDITDB.
Just one week ago, one of our customers HAD TO execute an audit db after 3 years of 
not to do it. That causes the TSM server had to be stopped for more than 50 
hours!!. (50 hours without backup or any possibility to restore).
So, with this expample, my personal opinion is, TSM server administrator should plan 
one (at least) or two "audit db" a year.
Of course, I am concius about to stop TSM server is not an easy issue but lots of 
problems could be avoided running the AUDIT DB.
It would be interesting that someone outhere gives us a point of view on this issue.

Hope this helps you in the long way to learn TSM.

Rafael
---
to: Riaan Louwrens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
date: 10/3/2002 8:37:39 AM
subject: TSM: DB Best Practises ?



> Hi There,

>

> Been monitoring the list the last couple of weeks. Seeing as we are

> relatively new to the "world of TSM".

>

> I havent come across this (yet) in any of the admin / installation / user

> guides but I woudl like to know if there is a "best practises" w.r.t

> maintaining our tivoli server. (this is where the personal experience out

> there REALLY comes in handy ...) I have already drawn up a short list - feel

> free to add to it 

>

> Daily Backups

> Reclamation (daily)

> Migration

> Create Offsite Copies

> Expiration

> Backup TSM DB

> SnapShot TSM DB

> Backup Volhist

> Expire Inv

>

> If possible any integrity or consistency check that we can run  to verify

> the DB ? TSM internal commands ? or external utilities ?

>

> Second Question: (I know I am pushing it - but seeing as I already have the

> guru's attention) - Does TSM have a utility that "scans" in a tape and

> re-populates the DB ? Example: We have a tape and we arent sure what data it

> contains - can one "scan" (for lack of a better term) the contents ? Can one

> restore from that tape (say to a temp location) to view the contents ?

>

> Any help is appreciated.

>

>

> Regards,

>

>

> Riaan Louwrens

> Source Consulting SA

>


___
Obtin gratis tu cuenta de correo en StarMedia Email. !Regmstrate hoy mismo!. 
http://www.starmedia.com/email

Re: Cross platform restores?

[Rafael Mendez]

Hi Steve,
Although there are some tricks to do that, I do not think that practice is acceptable. 
Why?, because "data is money" and, restoring data wherever you want means, in my 
opinion, data "traveling" without control of its owner. (Do not think you are the 
"good one", think on people attacking your data, your network... so on.)
At tech level, that practice could cause problems in TSM server and TSM clients and 
finally remember that NT file system(NTFS) are not the same type of Unix file systems.

Just my point of view.
Rafael

-- Mensaje original --
to: "Copper, Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
date: 8/30/2002 11:50:52 AM
subject: Cross platform restores?



> Hi All,

>

> Quick question:

>

> Is it possible to do a cross platform restore? If so, how?

>

> I have some users who wish to restore a backup image of an NT4 server onto a

> unix(AIX) server for purposes of DR (not my place to ask why). In my mind

> this could be possible as it is effectively only a binary file. I have been

> trying the "q backup" command with the fromnode option on the AIX server but

> it can't seem to see any files from the NT node. The access is set on the NT

> server to allow all users from all nodes access to the filespaces so I don't

> think this is a problem.

>

> TIA

>

> Steve Copper

>

>

>

>

>

> _

>

> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and

> intended solely for  the use of the individual or  entity to whom

> they  are addressed.  If  you have received  this email in  error

> please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]

>

> This  footnote also confirms  that this  message  has been  swept

> for all known viruses by the MessageLabs  Virus Scanning Service.

> For further  information  please visit http://www.messagelabs.com

>


___
Obtin gratis tu cuenta de correo en StarMedia Email. !Regmstrate hoy mismo!. 
http://www.starmedia.com/email

Re: Error ANS0101E

[Rafael Mendez]

Hi Charles,
Try exporting LANG=en_US.

Hope this helps,
Rafael
---
to: "Gallerson,Charles,GLENDALE,Information Technology" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
date: 8/30/2002 1:40:31 AM
subject: Error ANS0101E



> Greetings,

>

>   I encountered this "error" while issuing  "dsmadmc" from the AIX 4.3.3

> command line after installing the TSM Client system for the first time.

>

>

> ANS0101E NLInit: Unable to open message repository

> '/usr/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bi

> n/En_US/dsmclientV3.cat'.

> Tivoli Storage Manager

> Command Line Administrative Interface - Version 5, Release 1, Level 0.0

> (C) Copyright IBM Corporation 1990, 2002 All Rights Reserved.

>

> Enter your user id:

>

>

>

>

>THANKS

> crg

>


___
Obtin gratis tu cuenta de correo en StarMedia Email. !Regmstrate hoy mismo!. 
http://www.starmedia.com/email

Re: Return code 0 unknown

[Rafael Mendez]

Hi Thomas,
First, I think you allways should call IBM support.
Anyway, the problem you described is solved in TSM Client 4.2.2.X.

Hope this helps,
Rafael
---
to: "Rupp Thomas (Illwerke)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
date: 8/26/2002 3:00:36 PM
subject: Return code 0 unknown



> Dear *SM-ers,

>

> today I've seen the following messages in the dsmerror.log.

>

> ANS1228E Sending of object 'blabla' failed.

> Return code 0 unknown

> Return code 0 unknown

> Unknown system error

> Please check the TSM Error Log for any additional information

>

> The activity log shows the following messages:

>

> ANR0443W Protocol error on session 3519 for node USER (WinNT) -

> invalid "low-level qualifier" field found in "BackInsEnhanced" verb (offset

> 13).

> ANR0484W Session 3519 for node USER (WinNT) terminated - protocol violation

> detected.

>

> Client is W2K with TSM 4.2.1.20, server is AIX 5.1 with TSM 4.2.2.8

> The last thing I changed was AUTOFSRENAME YES to get unicode enabled

> filespaces.

>

> Should I call Tivoli support?

>

> Kind regards

> Thomas Rupp

> Vorarlberger Illwerke AG

> MAIL:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> TEL:  43/5574/4991-251

> FAX:  43/5574/4991-820-8251

>

>

>

>

> 
>--

> Dieses eMail wurde auf Viren geprueft.

>

> Vorarlberger Illwerke AG

> 
>--

>


___
Obtin gratis tu cuenta de correo en StarMedia Email. !Regmstrate hoy mismo!. 
http://www.starmedia.com/email

Re: Regarding Audit of Database

[Rafael Mendez]

Hi Farren,
I have not seen unified criteria about the time spent for AUDITDB and it's normal 
because, everybody has different machines, different TSM server version, different DB 
sizde and log size and so on.
Anyway, i would like to give you some examples about the time spent for some of our 
clients.
- 10 hours:   8 Gb DB and 2 Gb LOG. Using TSM server 4.2.2.6 on windows NT 4.0 on A 
Netfinity pentium III with 2 Gb RAM.
- 3 hours: 5Gb DB and 1 Gb LOG. Using TSM server 4.2.1.7 on Solaris 7.
- 4 hours: 4Gb DB and 2 Gb LOG. Using TSM server 4.2.1.9 on AIX. Server is an H80 with 
two proccessors ans 2 Gb RAM.

Like you can see, in my opinion, its impossible to know the exact time for an auditdb.

Regards,
Rafael
---
to: Farren Minns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
date: 8/22/2002 11:08:36 AM
subject: Regarding Audit of Database



> Hi all

>

> In a few weeks time, we are going to be upgrading from TSM3.7.3.8 to

> 5.1.?.? As such, I have been asked to perform an audit db the weekend

> before the upgrade.

>

> The current set up is - TSM 3.7.3.8 running on Solaris 2.7 box. Our

> database is currently 7500Mb (68 % utilised). We have a log volume of

> 1000Mb.

>

> Having never run an auditdb before, I'm a little unsure what to expect. Any

> ideas how long it might take? Will the log volume be big enough? Are there

> any serious problems we may encounter or is an auditdb a nice a simple

> thing to do.

>

> Any information at all from anyone will be very much appreciated.

>

> Many thanks in advance

>

> Farren Minns - TSM and Solaris System Admin - John Wiley & Sons

>

> **

>

> Our Chichester based offices are amalgamating and relocating to a new

> address

> from 1st September 2002

>

> John Wiley & Sons Ltd

> The Atrium

> Southern Gate

> Chichester

> West Sussex

> PO19 8SQ

>

> Main phone and fax numbers remain the same:

> Phone  44 (0)1243 779777

> Fax44 (0)1243 775878

> Direct dial numbers are unchanged

>

> Address, phone and fax nos. for all other Wiley UK locations are unchanged

> **

>


___
Obtin gratis tu cuenta de correo en StarMedia Email. !Regmstrate hoy mismo!. 
http://www.starmedia.com/email

Re: Backing up NFS on Solaris Server

[Rafael Mendez]

Hi Rajesh,
>From the manual TSM BA client installation and User's guide:

Options File
Place this option in the client system options file sys ) or the client user
options file opt ).
Syntax
 DOMain all-local
 domain
  all-lofs
  all-nfs
 all-auto-nfs
 all-auto-lofs
Parameters
 all-local
   Backs up all local file systems except LOFS file systems and LOFSthrough 
automounter. This is the default.
   The /tmp directory is not included.

domain
Defines the file systems to include in your default client domain.
When you use domain with the incremental command, it processes these file
systems in addition to those you specify in your default client domain.

all-lofs
Backs up all loopback file systems, except those handled by automounter.

all-nfs
Backs up all network file systems, except those handled by automounter.

..
Hope this helps,
Rafael

---
to: Rajesh Oak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
date: 8/23/2002 1:28:01 PM
subject: Backing up NFS on Solaris Server



> What needs to be done to backup a NFS.?

> There are a couple of Sun Solaris Web Servers that have NFS mounted file Systems. 
>Actually there are 2 NFS which are really on the same Server (a local fs is mounted 
>as a NFS).

> What changes do I have to make in the dsm.sys or dsm.opt file to backup the local as 
>well as the mounted NFS.?

> They backup to an AIX TSM Server if that helps.

> Any help is appreciated.

>

> Rajesh Oak

>

>

> _

> Play the Elvis. Scratch & Win for your chance to instantly win $10,000 Cash

> - a 2003 Harley Davidson. Sportster. - 1 of 25,000 CD's - and more!

> 
>http://r.lycos.com/r/sagel_mail_scratch_tl/http://win.ipromotions.com/lycos_020801/index.asp?tc=7087

>


___
Obtin gratis tu cuenta de correo en StarMedia Email. !Regmstrate hoy mismo!. 
http://www.starmedia.com/email

Re: Linux Backup

[Rafael Mendez]

Hi Lindy,
I think, your linux server is not in compliance with the requeriments for a tsm 4.1 
client.
Check the followinhg link:
http://www.tivoli.com/support/storage_mgr/adcllin.htm

Hope this helps.
Rafael
Madrid-spain
---
to: "Crawford, Lindy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
date: 8/22/2002 3:00:05 AM
subject: Linux Backup



> Hi TSMers,

>

>

> > Yesterdays initial backup only backed up the "/usr" directory. This

> > morning final backup backed up all file systems.  [Crawford, Lindy]

> > Please could you assist me, the linux client - server is linux 6.5 and

> > using the tsm client 4.1. Our tsm server is on 4.2 on the operating system

> > Windows 2000 advanced.

> >

> As the customer wants full backup every day, what I have done is changed the

> copy mode to absolute on that management class copy group. In the dsm.sys

> file I have put in include statements to include the filesystems of that

> client.

>

> This is my what if logged in the file as you can see the pipfinbup (final

> backup) does everything and the initial backup does not.every night the

> client runs a full initial backup before the batch job, once the batch job

> is complete it runs a final backup

>

> Please help...

> >

> > /tmp> tail pipfinbup.20020821

> >

> > Total number of objects rebound:  0

> >

> > Total number of objects deleted:  0

> >

> > Total number of objects expired:  0

> >

> > Total number of objects failed:   0

> >

> > Total number of bytes transferred: 5.62 GB

> >

> > Data transfer time:  747.82 sec

> >

> > Network data transfer rate:7,882.94 KB/sec

> >

> > Aggregate data transfer rate:  1,676.35 KB/sec

> >

> > Objects compressed by:0%

> >

> > Elapsed processing time:   00:58:36

> >

> > /tmp> tail pipinitbup.20020821

> >

> > Total number of objects rebound:  0

> >

> > Total number of objects deleted:  0

> >

> > Total number of objects expired: 39

> >

> > Total number of objects failed:   0

> >

> > Total number of bytes transferred: 2.69 GB

> >

> > Data transfer time:  385.59 sec

> >

> > Network data transfer rate:7,332.56 KB/sec

> >

> > Aggregate data transfer rate:  1,368.79 KB/sec

> >

> > Objects compressed by:0%

> >

> > Elapsed processing time:   00:34:25

> >

> > /tmp>

> >

> > Lindy Crawford

> > Business Solutions: IT

> > BoE Corporate

> >

> > *   27-31-3642185

>  <<...OLE_Obj...>>   27-31-3642946

>  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

>

>

> >

> >

> >

> WARNING:

> Any unauthorised use or interception of this email is illegal. If this email

> is not intended for you, you may not copy, distribute nor disclose the

> contents to anyone. Save for bona fide company matters, BoE Ltd does not

> accept any responsibility for the opinions expressed in this email.

> For further details please see: http://www.boe.co.za/emaildisclaimer.htm

>


___
Obtin gratis tu cuenta de correo en StarMedia Email. !Regmstrate hoy mismo!. 
http://www.starmedia.com/email

Re: Solaris Question

[Rafael Mendez]

Hi,
The following site could help you with all your solaris questions. For me is very 
useful.
 www.searchsolaris.com
There you can make a simple search.

Hope this helps.
Rafael
Madrid-Spain
---
to: "Ramnarayan, Sean A [EDS]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
date: 8/20/2002 4:16:48 AM
subject: Solaris Question



> Hi

>

> I know this question is not based on TSM, but I need some advice on how to increase 
>a filesystem in Solaris

> Version 7. The filesystem I need to increase is called /usr.

> I hope someone out there could help me.

> I am new to Solaris and I was spoilt using AIX.

>

> Thks

> Sean Ramnarayan

> UNIX/TSM Administrator

> EDS (South Africa)

>

>

> "MMS " made the following

>  annotations on 08/20/2002 10:12:22 AM

> --

> DISCLAIMER

> This message may contain confidential information that is legally privileged and is 
>intended only  for the use of the parties to whom it is addressed. If you are not an 
>intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, 
>distribution or use of any information in this message is strictly prohibited. If you 
>have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete 
>the message. Thank you.

>

> ==

>


___
Obtin gratis tu cuenta de correo en StarMedia Email. !Regmstrate hoy mismo!. 
http://www.starmedia.com/email

Re: Collocation and mount points

[Rafael Mendez]

Hi David,
Have you checked errpt?. Do you have more than one drive?. Drives are online?

If you have more then one drive available, you should checked  the value of the 
parameter "Mount Limit" in the device class.  Normally this value should equal 
"DRIVES".

Hope this helps.
Rafael
---
to: McMullen David E <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
date: 8/14/2002 8:57:24 AM
subject: Collocation and mount points



> I turned on collocation last week and now I am getting this message:

>

> ANR1082W Space reclamation terminated for volume 4A0023 - insufficient

> number of mount points available for removable media.

>

> I looked up the error message and it tells me:User Response: If necessary,

> make more mount points available

>

> Is this the same as mount limit for the server?  I see that you can specify

> number of mount points for a node.  But how can you specify this for a tape?

>

> TIA

>

> David Mac

>


___
Obtin gratis tu cuenta de correo en StarMedia Email. !Regmstrate hoy mismo!. 
http://www.starmedia.com/email

Re: LTO question

[Rafael Mendez]

Hi Paul,
Have you tryied disabling W2K driver?.

(Why don't you put a new question is list? )

Rafael
---
to: Paul Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
date: 8/13/2002 1:19:11 PM
subject: Re: Restore backupset take very long



> Hoping someone might have an answer/guidance for me.  We are evaluating

> Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM) v5.1.1.  It seems that the LTO drive/autoloader

> we have though is not recognized by WIN2K/TSM.  Presently we use the tape

> drive on a Netware 5.1/Backup Exec combo.  The IBM LTO drive/autoloader is a

> model 3600-109.  Tivoli's site says that TSM supports the 3600-109.  But I

> can't get Windows 2000 to load a correct driver for it.  IBM doesn't support

> WIN2K drivers for the 3600-109 like it does for the 3580,3581,3583,3584 LTO

> units.  I installed all the updated device drivers for TSM and still a no go

> with it.  Does anyone here have any experience with the 3600-109?  Any help

> would be appreciated.

>

> Thanks,

> Paul

>


___
Obtin gratis tu cuenta de correo en StarMedia Email. !Regmstrate hoy mismo!. 
http://www.starmedia.com/email

Re: Problems with running TSM and Netbackup on the same machi ne

[Rafael Mendez]

Hi again,
www.microsoft.com
->support
Search: q311141---> GO

Hope this helps.
Rafael


---
to: "Barkhordar,Gentille,GLENDALE,IS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
date: 8/13/2002 7:48:07 PM
subject: RE: Re: Problems with running TSM and Netbackup on the same machi  ne



> I'm sorry, but where do I get this article?

> Thanks again,

> Gentille

>

> > -Original Message-

> > From:   Rafael Mendez [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

> > Sent:   Tuesday, August 13, 2002 6:11 AM

> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> > Subject:re: Re: Problems with running TSM and Netbackup on the same

> > machine

> >

> > Hi,

> > Just one tip. Read MS article Q311141.

> >

> > Regards,

> > Rafael

> > ---

> > to: "Barkhordar,Gentille,GLENDALE,IS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> > cc:

> > date: 8/12/2002 7:55:02 PM

> > subject: Re: Problems with running TSM and Netbackup on the same machine

> >

> >

> >

> > > Hi,

> >

> > > Do you mean to say that none of the files that were asked to be excluded

> > in

> >

> > > the options file of the client were actually excluded from the TSM

> > backup

> >

> > > after the Legato or Backup Exec. backup?

> >

> > > Thanks,

> >

> > > Gentille

> >

> > >

> >

> > > -Original Message-

> >

> > > From: Ray Pratts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

> >

> > > Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 1:05 PM

> >

> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> >

> > > Subject: Re: Problems with running TSM and Netbackup on the same machine

> >

> > >

> >

> > >

> >

> > > I've had experience with TSM together with Legato and Backup Exec.  In

> > both

> >

> > > cases TSM always backed up every file after a Legato or Backup Exec

> > backup.

> >

> > > I expect you'll see the same behavior after a Netbackup backup.

> >

> > >

> >

> > > "Barkhordar,Gentille,GLENDALE,IS" wrote:

> >

> > >

> >

> > > > My client is currently in the process of replacing Netbackup with TSM

> > and

> >

> > > > would like to run both applications in parallel until the migration is

> >

> > > > complete.  Does anyone know of any problems with running the TSM

> > Backup

> >

> > > > Archive client and Netbackup on the same machine?  What about the TDP

> > for

> >

> > > > Oracle, exchange or SQL?

> >

> > > > Thanks,

> >

> > > > Gentille

> >

> > >

> >

> >

> > __

> > _

> > Obtin gratis tu cuenta de correo en StarMedia Email. !Regmstrate hoy

> > mismo!. http://www.starmedia.com/email

>


___
Obtin gratis tu cuenta de correo en StarMedia Email. !Regmstrate hoy mismo!. 
http://www.starmedia.com/email

Re: 2 Questions

[Rafael Mendez]

Hi Steve,
I have found that the error ANR0871E is solved installing a different patch level(4.1. 
but, like you should know, version 4.1 is out of support.
For that reason, I suggest you to upgrade TSM server at least to 4.2.2.0.
The error with tapes, I have seen some similar cases and allways using an audit volume 
 fix=no helps to solve it.

Hope this helps.
Rafael

---
to: "Copper, Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
date: 8/12/2002 8:21:25 AM
subject: Re: 2 Questions



> Sorry, forgot to put in the levels.

>

> Aix ”.3.3.

> TSM server ”.1.3.0

>

> Looks like I will be doing some upgrades to server level 4.1.4.1 at least. I

> will try an audit vol after I get the tape brought back onsite.

>

> I will contact TSM support to see what they recommend for the auditdb

> command.

>

> Thanks

>

> Steve

>

> -Original Message-

> From: Henk ten Have [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

> Sent: 12 August 2002 12:01

> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> Subject: Re: 2 Questions

>

>

> This email  and any files transmitted  have been  checked by  the

> MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service  for the presence of  computer

> viruses.

>

> Please  exercise caution  when receiving  any attachment(s)  from

> unknown sources.  If in any doubt, do not open any attachment and

> delete the message immediately.

>

> Thank you for your co-operation.

> _

>

>   Steve,

>

>   first, it would be nice if you give your TSM server platform and version.

>

> > I have 2 different problems that maybe someone can help with.

> >

> > Firstly when doing expiration I receive the following error message

> >

> > ANR0871E Cannot find file space name for node 86, file space 1073741823.

>

>   This problem we had also a year ago, it was fixed in 4.1.1 (AIX).

>

> > Secondly, I have a tape volume that will not be reclaimed. When I do a q

> vol

> > command on it, it says that the pct utilised is 0.0. When I try and q the

> > contents of the tape it says that there is nothing on the tape. However I

> > can not reclaim it, delete it or move data (it says there is no data to

> > move). When I start reclamation the activity log says that it will be

> > reclaimed but then nothing ever happens with it.

>

>   Workaround is 'audit vol fixNs', this problem is solved in 4.2.1.13

> (AIX).

>

>   Cheers,

>   Henk ten Have.

>

> _

>

> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and

> intended solely for  the use of the individual or  entity to whom

> they  are addressed.  If  you have received  this email in  error

> please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]

>

> This  footnote also confirms  that this  message  has been  swept

> for all known viruses by the MessageLabs  Virus Scanning Service.

> For further  information  please visit http://www.messagelabs.com

>


___
Obtin gratis tu cuenta de correo en StarMedia Email. !Regmstrate hoy mismo!. 
http://www.starmedia.com/email

Re: WIN2K-Complete-Restore

[Rafael Mendez]

Hi,
I remember I had the same question some time ago.
Thanks Wanda Prather we have a good document in: http://www.autovault.org/discus/
- Tivoli Storage Manager scripts
 Disaster Recovery
--W2K bare Metal Restore

One extra tip. Read Ms article Q311141 because there is a problem with W2K servers.

Hope this helps.
Rafael

---
to: Christoph Pilgram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
date: 8/13/2002 9:12:02 AM
subject: WIN2K-Complete-Restore



> Hi all,

>

> I remember a document (Red-Book) where was written how to restore the

> Operating-System and all data to a WIN-NT-Server (By starting with an extra

> partition with TSM-Client and restoring the other partition ...).

> I can not find this document anymore on any Web-page from IBM. Does anybody

> have a link ?

>

> But my real problem is to recover a W2K-Server. My collegues are testing

> recovery on W2K-Servers and up to now thei didn't manage to get one running

> as before (problems that are reported by them are e.g. with the

> InternetExplorer 6). Does anybody have a tested plan on how to recover a

> W2K-Server with TSM (not realy bar-metal but e.g. with an extra partition

> ...) or is there anywhere a document on how to do it ?

>

>

> Thanks for help

> Christoph.

>


___
Obtin gratis tu cuenta de correo en StarMedia Email. !Regmstrate hoy mismo!. 
http://www.starmedia.com/email

Re: ANR8925W

[Rafael Mendez]

Hi,
If you have a TSM server version lower than 4.1.4 you have to upgrade it.
If this is the case, remember that version 4.1 is out of support.

Regards,
Rafael
---
to: David E Ehresman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
date: 7/31/2002 10:19:59 AM
subject: ANR8925W



> Is there a parm that controls the time that tsm waits for a storage

> agent to respond before issuing the "ANR8925W Drive DRIVE105 in library

> 3494 has not been confirmed for use by server MINERVA_SA for over 600

> seconds. Drive will be reclaimed for use by others" message?

>

> David

>


___
Obtin gratis tu cuenta de correo en StarMedia Email. !Regmstrate hoy mismo!. 
http://www.starmedia.com/email

Re: MS Exchange backup fails

[Rafael Mendez]

Hi,
This is a MS problem.
You could check the MS docs Q192657 and Q240145.
To give you a clue, maybe Ms people should delete all log files and re-ran
the incremental backup.
Hope this helps.

Rafael
---
to: Yahya Ilyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
date: 8/1/2002 5:08:28 PM
subject: MS Exchange backup fails



> We recently upgraded from WinNT to Win2K SP2, and ADSM/TSM incremental and

> full backups started failing on those machines.  One server which has Win2k

> from the beginning does not fail and backup works fine.

> MS Exchange version is 5.5 SP4.  and TDP for MS Exchange is version 1.1.

>

> I get following errors:

>

> ACN3025E -- Backup error encountered.

> ACN4226E -- Exchange Error: Unable to perform an incremental backup because

> a required Microsoft Exchange database log file could not be found.

> 07/27/2002 18:06:46 Finished command. Return code is:

> 310

> 07/27/2002 18:06:46 ANS1512E Scheduled event 'EXCHMAINEX4-SCH' failed.

> Return code “10.

> 07/27/2002 18:06:46 Sending results for scheduled event 'EXCHMAINEX4-SCH'.

> 07/27/2002 18:06:46 Results sent to server for scheduled event

> 'EXCHMAINEX4-SCH'.

>

>

> Thanks

> Yahya

>

>

> >   -

> >   Yahya Ilyas

> >   Systems Programmer Sr

> >   Systems Integration & Management

> >   Information Technology

> >   Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-0101

> >

> >   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> >   Phone: (480) 965-4467

> >

> >

>


___
Obtin gratis tu cuenta de correo en StarMedia Email. !Regmstrate hoy mismo!. 
http://www.starmedia.com/email

Re: Compare TSM/Legato and Veritas

[Rafael Mendez]

Hi,
In my opinion (I have used Legato and TSM not Veritas) each storage product has its 
advantages and disadvantages.
Legato is easy to install and configure but when you have very new devices, Legato is 
not the best. Also, i do not trust in Legato support.

TSM is in my opinion the most powerful storage software but is hard to understand how 
it works.  You need to study very much and sometimes TSM require too much effort.

Legato could be installed over a small network(for that reason you have three 
different versions of Legato Server) but I do not think is a good idea to install TSM 
if you have small network.

Legato on Solaris is very good like TSM on AIX( I am not telling Legato and TSM 
installed over other OS work badly).
Installing Legato maybe you do not need to have a Legato Admin but I am sure that TSM 
needs allways an administrator.

So, this is just my point of view and I am concious that many people could disagree 
with me.

Regards,
Rafael

---
to: "Ramnarayan, Sean A [EDS]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
date: 8/1/2002 10:12:13 AM
subject: Compare TSM/Legato and Veritas



> Hi

>

> I have been asked by management to do a report/difference on the technical 
>specifications (very brief) of these products :

>   Legato

>   TSM

>   Veritas

>

> Has anyone done this before as I just need a guide line as where to go on the 
>Internet to find this info.

>

>

> Thks

> Sean Ramnarayan

> EDS (South Africa)

>

>

>

>

> "MMS " made the following

>  annotations on 08/01/2002 01:58:16 PM

> --

> DISCLAIMER

> This message may contain confidential information that is legally privileged and is 
>intended only  for the use of the parties to whom it is addressed. If you are not an 
>intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, 
>distribution or use of any information in this message is strictly prohibited. If you 
>have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete 
>the message. Thank you.

>

> ==

>


___
Obtin gratis tu cuenta de correo en StarMedia Email. !Regmstrate hoy mismo!. 
http://www.starmedia.com/email

Re: install library STORAGE TEK L20

[Rafael Mendez]

Hi Carlos,
Firstly, I think is not recomendable that you mantain your actual TSM server version 
because, like you should know, 4.1 version is out of support.
Answering to your question, you have a complete procedure of how to add an automatic 
library in any "Quick start"

http://www.tivoli.com/support/public/Prodman/public_manuals/td/StorageManagerforHP-UX4.2.html

Hope this help.
Rafael Mindez

PD: Si necesitas cualquier ayuda en espaqol, puedes escribirme un mensaje a 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

---
to: CARLOS RAMON BRAVO ARREDONDO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
date: 7/26/2002 5:59:44 PM
subject: install library STORAGE TEK L20



> I need of their help.

> I have a server TSM 4.1 in a HP-UX 11.00 and I need to add a library STORAGE

> TEK L20.

> Which is the procedure to install the library and 2 drives DLT7000?

> Thank you for their help.

>

>

> Carlos R. Bravo Arredondo

> [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> Tel. 51741924

>


___
Obtin gratis tu cuenta de correo en StarMedia Email. !Regmstrate hoy mismo!. 
http://www.starmedia.com/email

Re: ANS1809E Session is lost

[Rafael Mendez]

Hi Eduardo,
Have you tryied changing the following parameters on dsmserv.opt?:
commtimeout
idletimeout
tcpbuffsize
tcpwindowsize

I think, if you change those parameters to upper values, the error will desappears.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Rafael
---
to: Eduardo Martinez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
date: 6/24/2002 4:00:42 PM
subject: ANS1809E Session is lost



> Two of my servers are continously failing because of the following

> error: ANS1809E Session is lost, does anyone know what could be

> happening here?

>

> Thanks in advance.

>

> f6
> "Do or Do Not, there is no try"

> -Yoda. The Empire Strikes Back

>

> ___

> Copa del Mundo de la FIFA 2002

> El znico lugar de Internet con vmdeos de los 64 partidos.

> !Apzntante ya! en http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com/fc/es/

>


___
Obtin gratis tu cuenta de correo en StarMedia Email. !Regmstrate hoy mismo!. 
http://www.starmedia.com/email

Re: problems Query Client Events

[Rafael Mendez]

Hi Carlos,
I suggest you to increase the size of the DB too increase the Maximum Reduction to be 
greater than 0.
Also, you have the option of reorganize your DB (using UNLOADDB/LOADDB ) but in my 
opinion, this option should be done just in case of previous suggestion does not works.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Rafael
---
to: CARLOS RAMON BRAVO ARREDONDO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
date: 6/21/2002 9:58:30 PM
subject: problems Query Client Events



> I have problems when trying to execute a Query Client Events.

> The error messages are the following ones.

>

> 19/06/02   11:34:02  ANR2958E SQL temporary table storage has been

> exhausted.

> 19/06/02   11:34:02  ANRD hthtml.c(2837): Error 2 received from

> idOpQueryParms.

> 19/06/02   11:34:02  ANR2032E HTML: Command failed - internal server error

> detected.

>

> Server Error

> Interface error encountered in the Hypertext Engine (hthtml.c,2837).

> ANR2032E HTML: Command failed - internal server error detected.

>

>

> Query database

>

> tsm: BSMTSM04>q db f&
>

>   Available Space (MB): 2.500

> Assigned Capacity (MB): 2.500

> Maximum Extension (MB): 0

> Maximum Reduction (MB): 0

>  Page Size (bytes): 4.096

> Total Usable Pages: 640.000

> Used Pages: 218.454

>   Pct Util: 34,1

>  Max. Pct Util: 34,1

>   Physical Volumes: 5

>  Buffer Pool Pages: 512

>  Total Buffer Requests: 49.646

> Cache Hit Pct.: 95,50

>Cache Wait Pct.: 0,00

>Backup in Progress?: No

> Type of Backup In Progress:

>   Incrementals Since Last Full: 0

> Changed Since Last Backup (MB): 83,78

> Percentage Changed: 9,82

> Last Complete Backup Date/Time: 18/06/02   16:35:29

>

>

> Query log

>

> tsm: BSMTSM04>q log f&
>

>Available Space (MB): 840

>  Assigned Capacity (MB): 840

>  Maximum Extension (MB): 0

>  Maximum Reduction (MB): 832

>   Page Size (bytes): 4.096

>  Total Usable Pages: 214.528

>  Used Pages: 290

>Pct Util: 0,1

>   Max. Pct Util: 0,2

>Physical Volumes: 3

>  Log Pool Pages: 128

>  Log Pool Pct. Util: 0,81

>  Log Pool Pct. Wait: 0,00

> Cumulative Consumption (MB): 39.051,00

> Consumption Reset Date/Time: 13/06/01   18:21:23

>

> Filesytem the server

>

> {BSMTSM04:>/}% df -k

> Filesystem1024-blocks  Free %UsedIused %Iused Mounted on

> /dev/hd465536 23528   65% 417713% /

> /dev/hd2  4128768864216   80%65564 7% /usr

> /dev/hd9var 32768 27576   16%  241 3% /var

> /dev/hd332768 29020   12%   39 1% /tmp

> /dev/hd132768 316244%   48 1% /home

> /dev/lv0117629184 0  100%   26 1% /tsmdata1

> /dev/lv0014548992 0  100%   24 1% /tsmdata

> /dev/lv0312025856 0  100%   23 1% /tsmdata2

> /dev/lv02 3014656  1764  100%   24 1% /tsmdb

>

> Does the problem pretend to be in the temporary tables, How can I liberate

> this space?

> your assistance is greatly appreciated.

> Thanks,

>

>

>

> Carlos R. Bravo Arredondo

> [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> Tel. (52) 5551741924

>


___
Obtin gratis tu cuenta de correo en StarMedia Email. !Regmstrate hoy mismo!. 
http://www.starmedia.com/email

TDP for Domino URGENT!!!!!!!!

[Rafael Mendez]

Hi all,
I hope someone out there could help me with this problem that is really URGENT!.
I have a Domino 5.0.10 on AIX 4.3.3 with TDP for Domino 1.1.2
TSM server 4.2.1.7 on AIX.
The problem is, when I execute selective backups, all is working fine but, when I try 
with incremental backups, the tdp only inspect the databases but the backup does not 
occurs.
Here you have the output:
ju  6 jun 11:59:05 2002

Tivoli Storage Manager
Tivoli Data Protection for Lotus Domino - Version 1, Release 1, Level 2.0
(C) Copyright IBM Corporation 1999, 2001. All rights reserved.

License file exists and contains valid license data.

ACD5221I The /var/local/tsm/dominc2.log log file has been pruned successfully.

Starting Domino database backup...
Initializing Domino connection...
Querying Domino for a list of databases, please wait...
Logging on to the Tivoli Storage Manager server, please wait...
Querying Tivoli Storage Manager server for a list of database backups, please wait...



Total Domino databases inspected: 55
Total Domino databases backed up: 0
Total Domino databases excluded:  0
Total Domino backup objects expired:  0

Throughput rate:  0.00 Kb/Sec
Total bytes transferred:  0
Elapsed processing time:  0.00 Secs

Of course, we are sure that databases have changed.
The following is the test of selective backup of one database but, trust me, if  we 
execute selective backup of all databases ( 6000 DB) all is working well.
ju  6 jun 12:02:32 2002

Tivoli Storage Manager
Tivoli Data Protection for Lotus Domino - Version 1, Release 1, Level 2.0
(C) Copyright IBM Corporation 1999, 2001. All rights reserved.

License file exists and contains valid license data.

ACD5221I The /var/local/tsm/dominc2.log log file has been pruned successfully.

Starting Domino database backup...
Initializing Domino connection...
Querying Domino for a list of databases, please wait...
Logging on to the Tivoli Storage Manager server, please wait...

Backing up database mail/jmg59t.nsf, 1 of 1.
Full: 1   Read: 10485760  Written: 9437184  Rate: 8,494.01 Kb/Sec
Full: 0   Read: 23068672  Written: 23068672  Rate: 10,799.62 Kb/Sec
Full: 1   Read: 36700160  Written: 35651584  Rate: 11,281.92 Kb/Sec
Full: 0   Read: 45088768  Written: 45088768  Rate: 10,776.31 Kb/Sec
Full: 2   Read: 57671680  Written: 55574528  Rate: 10,670.86 Kb/Sec
Full: 0   Read: 63700992  Written: 63700992  Rate: 10,221.49 Kb/Sec
Full: 0   Read: 63700992  Written: 63700992  Rate: 10,219.81 Kb/Sec

Backup of mail/jmg59t.nsf completed successfully.


Total Domino databases inspected: 1
Total Domino databases backed up: 1
Total Domino databases excluded:  0

Throughput rate:  10,219.81 Kb/Sec
Total bytes transferred:  63,700,992
Elapsed processing time:  6.09 Secs


Any idea?, All sugestions will be helpful.
Thanks in advance.
Rafael



___
Obtin gratis tu cuenta de correo en StarMedia Email. !Regmstrate hoy mismo!. 
http://www.starmedia.com/email

Re: Daily registry backup

[Rafael Mendez]

My question is: What is daily registry backup and when is used?
If you want to know the environment: TSM Client 4.2.1.12 on Windows NT.
TIA
---
to: "Rushforth, Tim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
date: 6/5/2002 4:47:29 PM
subject: Re: Daily registry backup



> In what context?

>

> Please explain more!

>

> -Original Message-

> From: Rafael Mendez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

> Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 9:11 AM

> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> Subject: Daily registry backup

>

>

> Hi all,

>

> Does anyone know what is the "daily registry backup"?

>

> Thanks in advance for any comment.

> Rafael

>

>

> 

> ___

> Obtin gratis tu cuenta de correo en StarMedia Email. !Regmstrate hoy mismo!.

> http://www.starmedia.com/email

>


___
Obtin gratis tu cuenta de correo en StarMedia Email. !Regmstrate hoy mismo!. 
http://www.starmedia.com/email

Daily registry backup

[Rafael Mendez]

Hi all,

Does anyone know what is the "daily registry backup"?

Thanks in advance for any comment.
Rafael


___
Obtin gratis tu cuenta de correo en StarMedia Email. !Regmstrate hoy mismo!. 
http://www.starmedia.com/email

TDP for Domino not working

[Rafael Mendez]

Hi all,

I need some help with TDP for Domino on NT.
Aparently all is working well but, when we execute
   domdsmc incremental * .
the last message we can see is the following:

 Querying Domino for a list of databases, please wait...
We wait for hours but the backup never occurs.

Does any one have seen this before? Any idea?
The environment is:
TDP 1.1.2 for Domino on windows NT 4.0
TSM server 5.1 on AIX

For your information, if we execute domdsmc incremental a*.nsf 
the backup occurs backing up only databases starting with the letter A (of course, if 
we replace the letter, the backup works but only with those databases begining with 
that letter).

Thanks in advance for your help.

Rafael


___
Obtin gratis tu cuenta de correo en StarMedia Email. !Regmstrate hoy mismo!. 
http://www.starmedia.com/email

Problems with client

[Rafael Mendez]

Hi All there,
We are having a problem with a TSM client 4.2.1.
The error in dsmsrror.log is the following:
11/26/01   00:02:48 Attempt to free unknown pointer. Addr 30028740, File procopt
s.cpp, Line 12282
11/26/01   00:02:48 Attempt to free unknown pointer. Addr 61, File procopts.cpp,
 Line 12282
11/26/01   00:02:49 main thread, fatal error, signal 11
11/26/01   00:02:49   0x1000312C *UNKNOWN*
11/26/01   00:02:49   0x1C6C *UNKNOWN*
11/26/01   00:02:49   0x1001F150 *UNKNOWN*
11/26/01   00:02:49   0x1001E998 *UNKNOWN*
11/26/01   00:02:49   0x10044598 *UNKNOWN*
. and so on.
This problem causes scheduler fall down and of course the backup does not occur. Also 
it generates a core.
The TSM client and the TSM server are installed on the same machine but the server 
works fine.
The operating system is AIX 4.3.3 and TSM server is 4.2.1.7.

Any ideas?.
Thanks in advance
Rafael

--

Obtin gratis tu cuenta de correo en StarMedia Email.
!Regmstrate hoy mismo!. http://www.starmedia.com/email

--

Version 4.2.1.7

[Rafael Mendez]

Hi all,
Does anyone have installed the 4.2.1.7 patch for TSM server?
We are planning to install this patch but we want to know if the problems on 4.2.1.6 
version are fixed.
Any comments?
TIA
Rafael Mindez
Prosol Ingenierma
Madrid-Spain


--

Obtin gratis tu cuenta de correo en StarMedia Email.
!Regmstrate hoy mismo!. http://www.starmedia.com/email

--