Impact of TSM upgrade to 4.2 on Fibre channel Protocol
Hi guys I am upgrading my TSM server from version 3.7.4 to 4.2.1.13. 2 Questions 1. What should be the upgrade path 3.7.4 --- 4.2 4.2.1.0 4.2.1.13 Is it right ?? 2. The install mentions that all FCP ( fibre channel protocol definitions will be lost and have to be re - installed ). I have got some FCP Disk drives and Fibre channel adapters attached to my tsm server . Please advise Regards Chandra Subash Unix/ Oracle Database Administrator Teletech International 154 Pacific Highway, St Leonards NSW 2065 Tel 02 -99301569 Sydney, Australia E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] This email is confidential and intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not an addressee please promptly notify the sender and delete the message; do not use the content in any other way.
FW: Help ??
Paul my man I have a question for you . I did an archive of a novell server . The archive ran for hours fine as it got hundreds of dir. and files . BUT once the archive finished , I notice many missing dir. and files . These seem to happen randomly. Any idea Paul .Is it a bug or a known issue . I cannot find any similar issues in mailing list. Regards Chandra Subash Unix/ Oracle Database Administrator Teletech International 154 Pacific Highway, St Leonards NSW 2065 Tel 02 -99301569 Sydney, Australia E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SQL query
HI guys I have a TSM question for you . The output from select * from events and q ev * * seemd to be different . The q ev * * output is acuurate where as output from select * from events does not show nodes backed up before 01:00 a.m.Therfore i am missing the window of 00:00 a.m to 01:00 a.m . Please advise. Regards Chandra
TSM 4.2.1.14 on AIX 4.3.3
Hi guys I had installed TSM 4.2.1.14 on AIX 4.3.3 . By nightly incremental backups were fine till they stopped doing anything and reports sucess Error is self explanatory . Please advise 06-03-2002 06:02:18 TCP/IP accepted connection from server. 06-03-2002 06:02:18 Querying server for next scheduled event. 06-03-2002 06:02:18 Node Name: Test 06-03-2002 06:02:19 Session established with server TSM: AIX-RS/6000 06-03-2002 06:02:19 Server Version 3, Release 7, Level 4.0 06-03-2002 06:02:19 Server date/time: 06-03-2002 06:02:19 Last access: 05-03-2002 06:02:55 06-03-2002 06:02:19 --- SCHEDULEREC QUERY BEGIN 06-03-2002 06:02:19 --- SCHEDULEREC QUERY END 06-03-2002 06:02:19 Next operation scheduled: 06-03-2002 06:02:19 06-03-2002 06:02:19 Schedule Name: STLPROD2 06-03-2002 06:02:19 Action:Incremental 06-03-2002 06:02:19 Objects: 06-03-2002 06:02:19 Options: 06-03-2002 06:02:19 Server Window Start: 06:00:00 on 06-03-2002 06-03-2002 06:02:19 06-03-2002 06:02:19 Executing scheduled command now. 06-03-2002 06:02:19 --- SCHEDULEREC OBJECT BEGIN STLPROD2 06-03-2002 06:00:00 06-03-2002 06:02:23 --- SCHEDULEREC STATUS BEGIN 06-03-2002 06:02:23 --- SCHEDULEREC OBJECT END STLPROD2 06-03-2002 06:00:00 06-03-2002 06:02:23 Scheduled event 'STLPROD2' completed successfully. 06-03-2002 06:02:23 Sending results for scheduled event 'STLPROD2'. 06-03-2002 06:02:23 Results sent to server for scheduled event 'STLPROD2'. 06-03-2002 06:02:23 ANS1483I Schedule log pruning started. 06-03-2002 06:02:24 Schedule Log Prune: 27 lines processed. 0 lines pruned. 06-03-2002 06:02:24 ANS1484I Schedule log pruning finished successfully. 06-03-2002 06:02:24 Querying server for next scheduled event. 06-03-2002 06:02:24 Node Name: test 06-03-2002 06:02:24 Session established with server TSM: AIX-RS/6000 06-03-2002 06:02:24 Server Version 3, Release 7, Level 4.0 06-03-2002 06:02:24 Server date/time: 06-03-2002 06:02:24 Last access: 06-03-2002 06:02:19 Regards Chandra Subash Unix/ Oracle Database Administrator Teletech International 154 Pacific Highway, St Leonards NSW 2065 Tel 02 -99301569 Sydney, Australia E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ADSM_DD_LOG4 error
Hi guys
I am getting this error on my IBM AIX 433 box running TSM 374 server with a
Storagetek L180 Library system
Any ideas ?
Regards
Chandra
---
LABEL: ADSM_DD_LOG4
IDENTIFIER: 4225DB66
Date/Time: Tue Mar 5 13:34:19
Sequence Number: 14269
Machine Id: 00408ABA4C00
Node Id: test_box
Class: H
Type:TEMP
Resource Name: lb0
Resource Class: library
Resource Type: ADSM-SCSI-LB
Location:30-60-00-15,0
Description
OPERATOR INTERVENTION REQUIRED
Probable Causes
ATTACHED SCSI TARGET DEVICE
Failure Causes
ATTACHED SCSI TARGET DEVICE
Recommended Actions
CORRECT THEN RETRY
CHECK POWER
CHECK PHYSICAL INSTALLATION
Detail Data
COMMAND
060F 1600
STATUS CODE
SENSE DATA
0102 7000 0600 000C 2801 4000
ERROR CODE
0
RETURN CODE
0
REFERENCE CODE
Invisible Archives
Hi guys I have a strange problem with automated Archives. I am on TSM server 3.7.4 moving to 4.2.19 shorly. Whenever I kick of an archive it says completed sucess but when i check it throught the browser e.g http://host_name:1581 it is not there . Please advise . This happens on AIX , NT and novell. Regards Chandra Subash Unix/ Oracle Database Administrator Teletech International 154 Pacific Highway, St Leonards NSW 2065 Tel 02 -99301569 Sydney, Australia E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AIX error ADSM_DD_LOG4
Hi guys
I get this error . TSM runs fine . Is it something to worry about ?
LABEL: ADSM_DD_LOG4
IDENTIFIER: 4225DB66
Date/Time: Mon Feb 25 11:17:10
Sequence Number: 14254
Machine Id: 00408ABA4C00
Node Id: iduna
Class: H
Type:TEMP
Resource Name: lb0
Resource Class: library
Resource Type: ADSM-SCSI-LB
Location:30-60-00-15,0
Description
OPERATOR INTERVENTION REQUIRED
Probable Causes
ATTACHED SCSI TARGET DEVICE
Failure Causes
ATTACHED SCSI TARGET DEVICE
Recommended Actions
CORRECT THEN RETRY
CHECK POWER
CHECK PHYSICAL INSTALLATION
Detail Data
COMMAND
060F 1600
STATUS CODE
SENSE DATA
0102 7000 0600 000C 2801 4000
ERROR CODE
0
RETURN CODE
0
REFERENCE CODE
Regards
Chandra Subash
Unix/ Oracle Database Administrator
Teletech International
154 Pacific Highway, St Leonards
NSW 2065
Tel 02 -99301569
Sydney, Australia
E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Expiration processing
Guys Any updates ?? -Original Message- From: Jane Bamberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 6:38 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Expiration processing Hi, I have SELFTUNEBUFpoolsize Yes.. shouldn't that be sufficient? - but I do see that my Cache hit percent is low.. Cache Hit Pct.: 97.15 Cache Wait Pct.: 0.00 Does anyone have any suggestions on how much to increase the size of the pool. These are my current Server options: (AIX 4.3.3, TSM 4.2.1.9) Server Option Option SettingServer Option Option Setting - - CommTimeOut7,200 IdleTimeOut120 BufPoolSize65536 LogPoolSize512 MessageFormat 1 Language en_US MaxSessions25ExpInterval0 ExpQuiet NoEventServerLogg- Yes ing MirrorRead DB VerifyMirrorRead LOG Verify MirrorWrite DB SequentialMirrorWrite LOGParallel VolumeHistory /adsmlog/logs/volh- VolumeHistory /usr/tivoli/tsm/se- ist.txt rver/bin/volhist.- txt Devconfig /adsmlog/logs/devc- Devconfig /usr/tivoli/tsm/se- onfig.txt rver/bin/devconfi- g.txt TxnGroupMax256 MoveBatchSize 100 MoveSizeThresh 500 StatusMsgCnt 10 RestoreInterval1,440 UseLargeBuffersYes DisableScheds NoNOBUFPREfetch No AuditStorage Yes REQSYSauthoutfile Yes SELFTUNEBUFpool- Yes SELFTUNETXNsizeNo size DBPAGEShadow NoDBPAGESHADOWFile dbpgshdw.bdt QueryAuth None LogWarnFullPerC- 90 ent ThroughPutDataT- 0 ThroughPutTimeT- 0 hreshold hreshold NOPREEMPT ( No )Resource Timeout 10 TCPPort1500 HTTPPort 1580 TCPWindowsize 65536 TCPBufsize 16384 TCPNoDelay NoCommMethod TCPIP CommMethod HTTP MsgInterval1 Enable3590Library Yes ShmPort1510 FileExit /var/log/dsmc/even- UserExit t.log(APPEND) FileTextExit AssistVCRRecovery Yes AcsAccessId AcsTimeoutX1 AcsLockDrive NoAcsQuickInit No SNMPSubagentPort 1521 SNMPSubagentHost 127.0.0.1 SNMPHeartBeatInt 5 TECHost TECPort0 Jane Bamberger IS Department Bassett Healthcare 607-547-4784 -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Longo Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 9:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Expiration processing One simple step that definitely improves expiration processing speed is having enough BUFPOOLSIZE. do a q db f=d and see what the cache Hit Pct is. Ideally is 98 % or better. If much lower, even 90% then expire will take longer. Also Cache Wait Pct should always be zero. David Longo [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/21/02 09:08AM Hi, I think you might be running into the same problem we are - our expire command never stops - but we do not see any more expired after about 1 hour.. it examines millions of files - but only expires about 20 or 30 thousand. IBM is lookining into the problem, and we have provided traces, and tried different solutions. Right now we run the command every morning with: expire inventory skipdirs=yes dur=120 TSM: 4.2.1.9 AIX 433 IBM 3494 Library We also have a terrible time with scratch tapes. Some days we have 60 then none. Jane Jane Bamberger IS Department Bassett Healthcare 607-547-4784 -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tony Jules Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 12:28 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Expiration processing We run expiration daily for a couple of hours, and we realized that we were not getting enough scratch tapes back. We decided to run expiration indefinitely until all objects that need to be expired are removed. Expiration is been running for a week with 9 millions objects expired. Is there a way to find out how many objects are eligible for expiration? That way, I can determine how long it is going to take. Thank you Tony Jules ITS / Olympus America Inc.
Retrieve from archive fails in NT
Hi guys I am using tsm client 4.2.1.15 on NT . I took a sucessful archive . Now I am trying to retrieve it to a Unix mapped samba share on windows but unable to get all files. some dir and files are missing . please advise . Is it unix or windows. retreive to windows works. thanks Regards Chandra Subash Unix/ Oracle Database Administrator Teletech International 154 Pacific Highway, St Leonards NSW 2065 Tel 02 -99301569 Sydney, Australia E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Successful or not?
You have left the datafiles for the Database . Please archive all logfiles, datafiles and control files and parameter files . This is incomplete archive in terms od Database -Original Message- From: Bill Smoldt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 2:16 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Successful or not? The archive was successful. The first errors happened while waiting for the tape to be mounted or to position to EOT Bill Smoldt STORServer, Inc. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sotonyi Attila Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 1:17 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Successful or not? Hi TSM experts! What do you think about the following errors below in the offline db backup log? Is it successful or unsuccessful? What could cause this problem? At the firt attempt the backup is unsuccessful and the 2nd retry semms ok. Job number: 5023 Oracle sid: prod Timestamp : 20011227201003 Function : Offline database file level archive to TSM server Oracle Server Manager Release 3.0.5.0.0 - Production (c) Copyright 1997, Oracle Corporation. All Rights Reserved. Oracle8 Enterprise Edition Release 8.0.5.2.1 - Production With the Objects option PL/SQL Release 8.0.5.2.0 - Production SVRMGR Connected. SVRMGR Database closed. Database dismounted. ORACLE instance shut down. SVRMGR ORACLE instance started. Total System Global Area357439648 bytes Fixed Size 47264 bytes Variable Size 185417728 bytes Database Buffers167772160 bytes Redo Buffers 4202496 bytes Database mounted. Database opened. SVRMGR Database closed. Database dismounted. ORACLE instance shut down. SVRMGR Server Manager complete. Datafile: /pdd/oradata/prod/control01.ctl archive started. Tivoli Storage Manager *** Fixtest, Please see README file for more information *** Command Line Backup Client Interface - Version 4, Release 1, Level 2.20 (C) Copyright IBM Corporation, 1990, 2000, All Rights Reserved. Archive function invoked. Node Name: GIR05 Session established with server TSM01: AIX-RS/6000 Server Version 4, Release 1, Level 4.0 Server date/time: 12/27/2001 20:12:42 Last access: 12/27/2001 20:10:02 Directory-- 512 /pdd/oradata [Sent] Directory-- 2,560 /pdd/oradata/prod [Sent] Normal File--23,617,536 /pdd/oradata/prod/control01.ctl ** Unsuccessful ** ANS1114I Waiting for mount of offline media. Retry # 1 Normal File--23,617,536 /pdd/oradata/prod/control01.ctl [Sent] Archive processing of '/pdd/oradata/prod/control01.ctl' finished without failure. Total number of objects inspected:3 Total number of objects archived: 3 Total number of objects updated: 0 Total number of objects rebound: 0 Total number of objects deleted: 0 Total number of objects expired: 0 Total number of objects failed: 0 Total number of bytes transferred:45.04 MB Data transfer time: 61.36 sec Network data transfer rate: 751.76 KB/sec Aggregate data transfer rate:709.24 KB/sec Objects compressed by:0% Elapsed processing time: 00:01:05 Archived file: /pdd/oradata/prod/control01.ctl - Datafile: /pdd/oradata/prod/control02.ctl archive started. Tivoli Storage Manager *** Fixtest, Please see README file for more information *** Command Line Backup Client Interface - Version 4, Release 1, Level 2.20 (C) Copyright IBM Corporation, 1990, 2000, All Rights Reserved. Archive function invoked. Node Name: GIR05 Session established with server TSM01: AIX-RS/6000 Server Version 4, Release 1, Level 4.0 Server date/time: 12/27/2001 20:13:47 Last access: 12/27/2001 20:12:42 Normal File--23,617,536 /pdd/oradata/prod/control02.ctl ** Unsuccessful ** ANS1114I Waiting for mount of offline media. Retry # 1 Normal File--23,617,536 /pdd/oradata/prod/control02.ctl [Sent] Archive processing of '/pdd/oradata/prod/control02.ctl' finished without failure. Total number of objects inspected:1 Total number of objects archived: 1 Total number of objects updated: 0 Total number of objects rebound: 0 Total number of objects deleted: 0 Total number of objects expired: 0 Total number of objects failed: 0 Total number of bytes transferred:45.04 MB Data transfer time:2.09 sec Network data transfer rate:22,049.08 KB/sec Aggregate data transfer rate: 11,497.06 KB/sec Objects compressed by:0% Elapsed processing time: 00:00:04 Archived file: /pdd/oradata/prod/control02.ctl \dv, Sstonyi Attila
Re: TSM Server locking
Try rebooting ur server . If it happens again apply a patch or contact tivoli -Original Message- From: Gabriel Wiley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 11:08 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TSM Server locking Becky, I have experienced that before. What I found out was, I had 2 lmcpd daemons running. No library communication from TSM, I could see the Library from AIX. (TSM got confused and hung itself) That does not seem to be the case for you unless you shutdown the physical server? . ? When it came back up it started fresh daemons ?? I killed te daemon processes, then halted TSM and brought it back up. Worked for me. Gabriel C. Wiley ADSM/TSM Administrator AIX Support Phone 1-614-308-6709 Pager 1-877-489-2867 Fax 1-614-308-6637 Cell 1-740-972-6441 Davidson, Becky [EMAIL PROTECTED]@VM.MARIST.EDU on 11/13/2001 06:14:09 PM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: TSM Server locking I am running tsm server 4.1.2 aix 4.3.3 12 3590E1A in a 3494 TDP for R/3 3.2.06 This past weekend at 16:00 my backup started by backing up my archive logs to disk. It opened 10 of 11 threads and then did absolutely nothing else. Other processes started during the night and anything that did not require a tape drive ran and completed successfully (dr tape courier to vault, expiration, various admin commands) but anything that needed a drive opened and did nothing more. I discovered it Sunday morning around 11 by logging in, noticing the problem and doing a q dr. It never returned. I have had a similar situation before and my experience has said if you do a q dr and it doesn't return recycle the TSM Server. I did that and everything continued to normal but I have no idea why this happened. I am honestly not sure where to look. Is it TDP? Is it the TSM Server? Is it something to do with the tape drives? Any suggestions? Thanks in advance for any suggestions Becky Davidson Data Manager/AIX Administrator EDS/Sara Lee Bakery Group voice: 314-259-7589 fax: 314-877-8589 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors on File server
Title: Errors on File server Hi Guys While restoring files for a File Server I get the following error .Please advise Thanks Chandra ANR0836W No query restore processing session 11164 for node FSTTNSTL1 and FSTTNSTL1\DATA: failed to retrieve file /DATA/GROUPS/OAC/GENERAL/STAFF/FLQUINN/COMMENTARIES- /NEW FORMAT/OCTOBER01/161001.XLS - file being skipped. 10/29/01 18:07:25 ANR0836W No query restore processing session 11164 for node FSTTNSTL1 and FSTTNSTL1\DATA: failed to retrieve file /DATA/GROUPS/OAC/GENERAL/STAFF/FLQUINN/COMMENTARIES- /NEW FORMAT/OCTOBER01/171001.XLS - file being skipped. 10/29/01 18:07:25 ANR0836W No query restore processing session 11164 for node FSTTNSTL1 and FSTTNSTL1\DATA: failed to retrieve file /DATA/GROUPS/OAC/GENERAL/STAFF/FLQUINN/COMMENTARIES- /NEW FORMAT/OCTOBER01/181001.XLS - file being skipped. 10/29/01 18:07:25 ANR0836W No query restore processing session 11164 for node FSTTNSTL1 and FSTTNSTL1\DATA: failed to retrieve file /DATA/GROUPS/OAC/GENERAL/STAFF/FLQUINN/INTERNAL DATA/INTERNAL INFO/APPRAISAL OCT 2001.DOC - file being skipped. 10/29/01 18:07:26 ANR0836W No query restore processing session 11164 for node FSTTNSTL1 and FSTTNSTL1\DATA: failed to retrieve file /DATA/GROUPS/OAC - file being skipped. 10/29/01 18:07:26 ANR0836W No query restore processing session 11164 for node FSTTNSTL1 and FSTTNSTL1\DATA: failed to retrieve file /DATA/GROUPS/OAC/GENERAL/STAFF/FLQUINN/COMMENTARIES- /NEW FORMAT/OCTOBER01/091001.XLS - file being skipped. 10/29/01 18:07:26 ANR0836W No query restore processing session 11164 for node FSTTNSTL1 and FSTTNSTL1\DATA: failed to retrieve file /DATA/GROUPS/OAC/GENERAL/STAFF/FLQUINN/OPERATIONS MANAGERS/PEOPLE TELECOM STUFF/OCTOBER EFFECTIVE FORECAST 380AWCV.XLS - file being skipped. 10/29/01 18:07:26 ANR0836W No query restore processing session 11164 for node FSTTNSTL1 and FSTTNSTL1\DATA: failed to retrieve file /DATA/GROUPS/OAC/GENERAL/STAFF/FLQUINN/OPERATIONS MANAGERS/PEOPLE TELECOM STUFF/OCTOBER EFFECTIVE FORECAST.XLS - file being skipped.
Re: FW: v4.2.1 TSM Clients
Technical Support if you require a response specifically from IBM. Otherwise there is no guarantee that IBM will respond to your question on the list server. I hopes this helps to clarify things. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/IBM@IBMUS Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. Good enough is the enemy of excellence. When I signed onto this list there was a specific statement, which effectively said, the postings by IBM/Tivoli staff are *NOT* an official answer from IBM/Tivoli. So as Zlatko Krastev wrote, they are a more skilled colleague. For official answers call the 800 number or search the web. On Mon, 22 Oct 2001, Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM wrote: Hi Zlatko! Andrew Raibeck is a person from TSM Development at Tivoli. So his statements are in fact Tivoli statements, unless otherwise specified, that is. Kindest regards, Eric van Loon KLM Royal Dutch Airlines -Original Message- From: Zlatko Krastev/ACIT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 16:29 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: FW: v4.2.1 TSM Clients First of all I do not know Andy's position at Tivoli. And read what is written in the README: This is not officially supported by IBM, but IBM support people do participate in the discussions, along with other users. So IMHO here Andy is just a colleague. More skilled in ADSM/TSM, closer to the developers, but just a colleague. If something shows up on the web-site or in docs on media that would be official. Zlatko Krastev IT Consultant Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 19.10.2001 17:57:48 Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: FW: v4.2.1 TSM Clients Andrew Raibeck answered I am almost certain that this change in behavior is not deliberate. The APAR is going to be handled as a code defect Isn't that you'r Tivoli official answer? Kindest regards, Eric van Loon KLM Royal Dutch Airlines -Original Message- From: Zlatko Krastev/ACIT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 12:29 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: FW: v4.2.1 TSM Clients This was already discussed in the list. Look for the thread Windows client behavior change at 4.2.1.0 and answer of Andrew Raibeck from 9.10.2001. But it is possible that Andy and this Bob are just having different PERSONAL opinions. We still do not have answer from any Tivoli official, do we? Zlatko Krastev IT Consultant Subash, Chandra [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 18.10.2001 07:41:31 Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:FW: v4.2.1 TSM Clients i HAVE GOT THIS EMAIL FROM ONE OF MY FRIENDS. GUYS WHAT DO YOU THINK IS IT TRUE ? Hi Guys According to Tivoli Support they have made an alteration to way client v4.2.1 reports Result code 4 to the server. Earlier version clients would allow for a certain number of files to fail during the backup and still report to the server that the Schedule was successful. However version 4.2.1 has been altered so that a result code of failed will be reported to the server even if 1 file fails during a backup. ntcmachine had been failing on some WINNT system files which I have added exceptions for under direction of Tivoli support and now backups of this machine seem to be successful. Bob from Tivoli suggested that if we are worried about seeing failed result codes on the daily report that there may be a way to generate a report listing statistics of how many files or how much data had been backed up from each machine to provide a more accurate picture as to whether the backups were successful. ** This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. **
