Re: Oracle TDPO error SBT 2175
Neil, Thank you very much for your response. I will have a look at it with our Oracle DBA (He will be in the office next tuesday) Regards, Adrie van Tuyl -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Neil Rasmussen [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden:woensdag 8 september 2004 16:23 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp:Re: Oracle TDPO error SBT 2175 Adrie, In a nutshell, the error that you are seeing from the sbtio.log is a telling sign that the object name that Oracle is giving to the file for that backup already exists on the TSM Server. Usually this is a result of the backup_piece name that Oracle generates is very long and the part of the name that should make the name unique is getting truncated so it looks like a duplicate name to TDP Oracle/TSM. Without seeing your Rman script for this backup I can only venture a guess but I think that you need to take a little more control over how the backup pieces are being named - you can control the naming (to a degree) that Rman/Oracle uses for it's backup_pieces, see the Rman User's guide on this subject. Regards, Neil Rasmussen Software Development Data Protection for Oracle [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tuyl Adrie, A.C. van [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/08/2004 02:44 AM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc Subject Oracle TDPO error SBT 2175 Dear Oracle and TSM specialists, We are trying to backup an Oracle database with Oracle TDPO for HP-UX. Installation as mentioned in the manual. We created a seperate tdpo node with backdelete yes. rman script works when creating files. When backing up to the TSM server we get the following error from the TDP: SBT-2175 08/04/2004 13:45:58 send2.cpp(650): sbtbackup(): Exit - tdpoQueryObj() failed. dsmHandle = 1, rc = 8 The log in TSM server does not show (me) problems, a connection from the TDP is made and data is sent. After that the connection is closed. What can be the problem here? TDPO logs and server logs added. Thanks, Adrie HP UX 11 Oracle 8.1.7.R4 TDPO 2.2.1 TSM server 5.1.8.2 (w2k SP4) Output TDPO ** ** $ cat sbtio.log === Tracing started for: --- Application Client : TDP Oracle HP Version : 2.2.1.0 === SBT-2175 08/04/2004 13:45:58 send2.cpp(650): sbtbackup(): Exit - tdpoQueryObj() failed. dsmHandle = 1, rc = 8 SBT-2175 08/04/2004 13:45:59 remove2.cpp(237): sbtremove2(): Exit - wrong state, dsmHandle = 1, state = 2 Server log ** 04-08-2004 13:41:43 ANR2017I Administrator 18447 issued command: UPDATE NODE OWCX01 CLOPTSET=HP_SERVER CONTACT=WOZ Centraal DOMAIN=HPUNIX COMPRESSION=YES AUTOFSRENAME=NO ARCHDELETE=YES BACKDELETE=YES FORCEPWRESET=NO KEEPMP=NO MAXNUMMP=5 URL=http://owcx01:1581 04-08-2004 13:41:43 ANR2063I Node OWCX01 updated. 04-08-2004 13:43:29 ANR0406I Session 25290 started for node OWCX01_ORCL (TDP Oracle HP) (Tcp/Ip 10.10.1.2(-3031)). 04-08-2004 13:47:00 ANE4991I (Session: 25290, Node: OWCX01_ORCL) TDP Oracle HP ANU0599 ANU2535I File /adsmorc//TMWB_8_1_533310141.bck = 204800 bytes sent 04-08-2004 13:47:00 ANR0406I Session 25291 started for node OWCX01_ORCL (TDP Oracle HP) (Tcp/Ip 10.10.1.2(-3026)). 04-08-2004 13:47:00 ANR0403I Session 25291 ended for node OWCX01_ORCL (TDP Oracle HP). 04-08-2004 13:47:00 ANR0403I Session 25290 ended for node OWCX01_ORCL (TDP Oracle HP). 04-08-2004 13:47:04 ANR0406I Session 25292 started for node OWCX01_ORCL (TDP Oracle HP) (Tcp/Ip 10.10.1.2(-3025)). 04-08-2004 13:47:05 ANR0403I Session 25292 ended for node OWCX01_ORCL (TDP Oracle HP). ** ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been checked by McAfee Groupshield for the presence of computer viruses. ** ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
Oracle TDPO error SBT 2175
Dear Oracle and TSM specialists, We are trying to backup an Oracle database with Oracle TDPO for HP-UX. Installation as mentioned in the manual. We created a seperate tdpo node with backdelete yes. rman script works when creating files. When backing up to the TSM server we get the following error from the TDP: SBT-2175 08/04/2004 13:45:58 send2.cpp(650): sbtbackup(): Exit - tdpoQueryObj() failed. dsmHandle = 1, rc = 8 The log in TSM server does not show (me) problems, a connection from the TDP is made and data is sent. After that the connection is closed. What can be the problem here? TDPO logs and server logs added. Thanks, Adrie HP UX 11 Oracle 8.1.7.R4 TDPO 2.2.1 TSM server 5.1.8.2 (w2k SP4) Output TDPO $ cat sbtio.log === Tracing started for: --- Application Client : TDP Oracle HP Version : 2.2.1.0 === SBT-2175 08/04/2004 13:45:58 send2.cpp(650): sbtbackup(): Exit - tdpoQueryObj() failed. dsmHandle = 1, rc = 8 SBT-2175 08/04/2004 13:45:59 remove2.cpp(237): sbtremove2(): Exit - wrong state, dsmHandle = 1, state = 2 Server log ** 04-08-2004 13:41:43 ANR2017I Administrator 18447 issued command: UPDATE NODE OWCX01 CLOPTSET=HP_SERVER CONTACT=WOZ Centraal DOMAIN=HPUNIX COMPRESSION=YES AUTOFSRENAME=NO ARCHDELETE=YES BACKDELETE=YES FORCEPWRESET=NO KEEPMP=NO MAXNUMMP=5 URL=http://owcx01:1581 04-08-2004 13:41:43 ANR2063I Node OWCX01 updated. 04-08-2004 13:43:29 ANR0406I Session 25290 started for node OWCX01_ORCL (TDP Oracle HP) (Tcp/Ip 10.10.1.2(-3031)). 04-08-2004 13:47:00 ANE4991I (Session: 25290, Node: OWCX01_ORCL) TDP Oracle HP ANU0599 ANU2535I File /adsmorc//TMWB_8_1_533310141.bck = 204800 bytes sent 04-08-2004 13:47:00 ANR0406I Session 25291 started for node OWCX01_ORCL (TDP Oracle HP) (Tcp/Ip 10.10.1.2(-3026)). 04-08-2004 13:47:00 ANR0403I Session 25291 ended for node OWCX01_ORCL (TDP Oracle HP). 04-08-2004 13:47:00 ANR0403I Session 25290 ended for node OWCX01_ORCL (TDP Oracle HP). 04-08-2004 13:47:04 ANR0406I Session 25292 started for node OWCX01_ORCL (TDP Oracle HP) (Tcp/Ip 10.10.1.2(-3025)). 04-08-2004 13:47:05 ANR0403I Session 25292 ended for node OWCX01_ORCL (TDP Oracle HP). This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been checked by McAfee Groupshield for the presence of computer viruses.
Re: Restore MS Exchange to another server
Exchange needs the same hostname of the original server to start when fully restored. If you restore the mail to a server in the same network (to restore a single emailbox) you off course install the server to a server with a different hostname. You then only restore the Information store. The procedure is written in detail in the exchange redbook Short: Install exchange server with the same version as production server Create a new site with the same organization and site name as used on the production server. DO NOT JOIN THE EXISTING SITE! Install TDP EXC Restore ONLY the Information store Run the DS/IS consistency adjuster from the Exchange Administrator program. The utility is found under the advanced tab on the Server properties sheet. Select all the Operation options and All inconsistencies Now if all goes well you can start Exchange. -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: William SO Ng [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden:woensdag 24 maart 2004 10:16 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp:Restore MS Exchange to another server Hello team, My environment is using MS Exchange 5.5 with TSM 5.2 and TSM for Mail 5.2. I would like to backup the existing exchange server and restore to another server. I am not a MS Exchange guru, so I need your advise here. I have a production Exchange with hostname ABC. I setup another Exchange with hostname EFG. I followed Appendix C of the user manual of TSM for Mail to do a full backup of Exch 5.5, restore it to EFG Then shutdown ABC, change the hostname of EFG to ABC and reboot. After reboot, MS exchange is not able to start. I found out Exchange Information Store cannot be started. Am I missing any step here ? Thanks Regards William This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been checked by McAfee Groupshield for the presence of computer viruses.
Re: TSM administration through web gui
What I noticed is when I installed the server as a standalone server, without pointing to a dns server, the access to the web gui went fine. The moment I added in the tsm server config the dns server, the problem appeared. That is what made me look towards the dns configuration. (after adding the reverse lookup zone and checking the add PTR record checkbox in dns, the problem disappeared, but you already know that) What you can try is : remove the dns server from the domain, remove the dns from the tcp/ip configuration of the tsm server and see if the problem persists... -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Yiannakis Vakis [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden:woensdag 4 februari 2004 11:56 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp:Re: TSM administration through web gui There's also something else I noticed. What is taking so long is the downloading of the icons (.gif files). Is that what you notice as well ? Yiannakis -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Wijnbergen, AMv Sent: 03 February 2004 09:44 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TSM administration through web gui We also got this strange problem. The funniest thing is, that after the upgrade from 5.1.6.1 to 5.2.1.3 we got the problem . So maybe a 5.2 related problem on windows server ? What I found out was , that when I disabled all backup Lan adaptors ( only enabled the production network card), the web console was fast, but after enabling the backup lan adaptors, the web console performance went slow again. I tested DNS and that is working ok . PTR records, etc also the lmhosts file.. Maybe somebody else got a clue ? Best Regards, Met Vriendelijke Groet, Mit freundlichen Gruessen, Arnold van Wijnbergen Technical Engineer Office Automation Technology -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Tuyl Adrie, A.C. van [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: maandag 2 februari 2004 16:15 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: Re: TSM administration through web gui Then it is most likely a DNS issue; a reverse lookup zone and a PTR record for the TSM server will likely do the trick. Ask your DNS administrator... -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Yiannakis Vakis [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden:maandag 2 februari 2004 16:12 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp:Re: TSM administration through web gui Actually on the server itself is very fast. Yiannakis -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tuyl Adrie, A.C. van Sent: 02 February 2004 16:31 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TSM administration through web gui Is it also slow when accessing the web gui local on the server itself? If not, it could be a dns issue. We had in a test environment a dramatic performance when accessing the web gui from another machine towards the tsm server. The problem was solved when a ptr record was added in dns for the tsm server. Adrie -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Yiannakis Vakis [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden:maandag 2 februari 2004 14:32 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp:TSM administration through web gui Hi, I have upgraded to TSM 5.2.00. Since the upgrade, the web gui administration is too slow. Has anyone noticed a similar situation ? If so, did you resolve to the problem and how? Thanks Yianakis ** ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been checked by McAfee Groupshield for the presence of computer viruses. ** ** ** ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been checked by McAfee Groupshield for the presence of computer viruses. ** ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been checked by McAfee Groupshield for the presence of computer viruses.
Re: TSM administration through web gui
Is it also slow when accessing the web gui local on the server itself? If not, it could be a dns issue. We had in a test environment a dramatic performance when accessing the web gui from another machine towards the tsm server. The problem was solved when a ptr record was added in dns for the tsm server. Adrie -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Yiannakis Vakis [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden:maandag 2 februari 2004 14:32 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp:TSM administration through web gui Hi, I have upgraded to TSM 5.2.00. Since the upgrade, the web gui administration is too slow. Has anyone noticed a similar situation ? If so, did you resolve to the problem and how? Thanks Yianakis This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been checked by McAfee Groupshield for the presence of computer viruses.
Re: TSM administration through web gui
Then it is most likely a DNS issue; a reverse lookup zone and a PTR record for the TSM server will likely do the trick. Ask your DNS administrator... -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Yiannakis Vakis [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden:maandag 2 februari 2004 16:12 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp:Re: TSM administration through web gui Actually on the server itself is very fast. Yiannakis -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tuyl Adrie, A.C. van Sent: 02 February 2004 16:31 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TSM administration through web gui Is it also slow when accessing the web gui local on the server itself? If not, it could be a dns issue. We had in a test environment a dramatic performance when accessing the web gui from another machine towards the tsm server. The problem was solved when a ptr record was added in dns for the tsm server. Adrie -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Yiannakis Vakis [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden:maandag 2 februari 2004 14:32 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp:TSM administration through web gui Hi, I have upgraded to TSM 5.2.00. Since the upgrade, the web gui administration is too slow. Has anyone noticed a similar situation ? If so, did you resolve to the problem and how? Thanks Yianakis ** ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been checked by McAfee Groupshield for the presence of computer viruses. ** ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been checked by McAfee Groupshield for the presence of computer viruses.
Re: ANR0836W No query restore
You can try adding the testflag DISABLENQR in your optfile (for this restore add the line 'TESTFLAG DISABLENQR' in your optfile). This way TSM won't try the 'No query restore' and maybe it will give you more information about why the restore could not be performed, or even do the restore correctly. See also the quickfacts about more info on No query restores Adrie van Tuyl -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Gerald Wichmann [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden:dinsdag 25 november 2003 0:48 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp:ANR0836W No query restore When attempting to do a restore I'm getting the messages below.. There is no other accompanying information. Anyone know what it means? There is nothing in the messages guide that sheds any light as to this ANR.. ANR0836W No query restore processing session 93 for node MDCTXUDSE261 and \\mdctxudse261\d$ failed to retrieve file \LOTUS\DOMINO\DATA\W32\CCMAIL.BMP - file being skipped. ANR0836W No query restore processing session 93 for node MDCTXUDSE261 and \\mdctxudse261\d$ failed to retrieve file \LOTUS\DOMINO\DATA\W32\AUTORUN.BMP - file being skipped. ANR0836W No query restore processing session 93 for node MDCTXUDSE261 and \\mdctxudse261\d$ failed to retrieve file \LOTUS\DOMINO\DATA\W32\AMIPRO.MAC - file being skipped. ANR0836W No query restore processing session 93 for node MDCTXUDSE261 and \\mdctxudse261\d$ failed to retrieve file \LOTUS\DOMINO\DATA\W32\AMIPRO.BMP - file being skipped. ANR0836W No query restore processing session 93 for node MDCTXUDSE261 and \\mdctxudse261\d$ failed to retrieve file \LOTUS\DOMINO\DATA\W32\AMIMENUS.BMP - file being skipped. ANR0836W No query restore processing session 93 for node MDCTXUDSE261 and \\mdctxudse261\d$ failed to retrieve file \LOTUS\DOMINO\DATA\W32\123W.MAC - file being skipped. Gerald Wichmann Manager, Systems Engineering Data Restoration ZANTAZ, Inc. 925.598.3099 (w) This e-mail has been captured and archived by the ZANTAZ Digital Safe(tm) service. For more information, visit us at www.zantaz.com. IMPORTANT: This electronic mail message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone or directly reply to the original message(s) sent. Thank you. This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been checked by McAfee Groupshield for the presence of computer viruses.
downward compatibility clients / server v 5.2
To what level downwards are clients compatible to server version 5.2? (I can't seem to find that in the readme's / references (or I am looking in the wrong place in which case I would like to be pointed in the right direction ;-) We are planning for a server upgrade (windows) from level 4.2.2.6, to 5.2 or 5.1 but we need to have some 4.2 clients staying on the 4.2 level. Is this possible / advisable? Or is it better to go to 5.1.7.2? Are there already experiences from 5.2 in a production environment? Thanks for your time, Adrie van Tuyl This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been checked by McAfee Groupshield for the presence of computer viruses.
Re: TSM Journal Engine Client Error
Can you share with us what worked for you? (client/server versions, settings in tsmjbbd.ini etc.) We also have a lot of trouble getting journalled backups working. Adrie van Tuyl -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Gill, Geoffrey L. [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden:woensdag 18 juni 2003 22:31 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp:Re: TSM Journal Engine Client Error We would get this error on one of our large file/print servers (700 GB, 1 million + files). It seems the journaling engine could not keep up with the number of changes. We spent some time working with IBM on the issue but could not get it resolved in a reasonable amount of time. We have removed the journal backup piece. That was over a month ago so they may have had time to work out the problems. When it worked it was incredible how fast the backups were, however... Ken Dave Canan was a big help in getting our 1TB+ and 4.5+ million files working with journaling. What a relief that is. You should easily be able to do 1+ million. Geoff Gill TSM Administrator NT Systems Support Engineer SAIC E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (858) 826-4062 Pager: (877) 905-7154 This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been checked by McAfee Groupshield for the presence of computer viruses.
Re: days in scripting
Works great Al, thanks! Nice solution, using select from db, but actually not selecting anything from the db :-) -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Alan Davenport [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden:maandag 24 maart 2003 14:54 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp:Re: days in scripting Yes, there is. I do this in my scripts. Here is an example below: Name Line Command Number -- -- DAILY_MAI- 1 issue message i 'Starting TSM Daily Maintenance.' NT 6 run healthcheck 11 select 1 from db where dayname(current_date)='Sunday' 16 if (rc_ok) goto Sunday 21 cancel expiration 26 issue message i 'Starting Backup of disc pool DirectoryPool to tape pool Copy_Directories' 31 ba stg directorypool copy_directories 36 issue message i 'Starting Backup of disc pool BACKUPPOOL to off-site tape pool COPYVAULT.' 41 ba stg backuppool copyvault maxpr=8 wait=yes 46 issue message i 'Starting Migration of files in disc pool to tape in pool TAPEPOOL.' 51 upd stg backuppool highm=10 lowm=0 56 delete sch migrate_check t=a 61 def sch migrate_check t=a cmd='run migrate_check' startt=now+0:10 active=y perunits=onetime 66 exit 71 Sunday: 76 issue message i 'Starting reclamation of partially full tapes.' 81 run startreclaim 86 issue message i 'Starting expiration of old data from the TSM database.' 91 expire i quiet=yes 96 exit Take care, Al Alan Davenport Senior Storage Administrator Selective Insurance Co. of America [EMAIL PROTECTED] (973) 948-1306 -Original Message- From: Tuyl Adrie, A.C. van [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 4:53 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: days in scripting Hi all, We have a daily tsm script which checks for missed backups, missed events, filesystems backupped longer then 24 hours ago etc. Weekends we do not backup all of our servers, so the check should be for last friday and not for sunday. Is there a way to implement the current day and do a jump depending on the current day? For instance: if 'today=monday' goto q ev * * begind=-3 else q ev * * begind=-1 Thanks, Adrie TSM Server 4.2.2.6 on Win NT 4 SP 6a ** ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been checked by McAfee Groupshield for the presence of computer viruses. ** ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been checked by McAfee Groupshield for the presence of computer viruses.
Re: File scan takes ages during backup
Hi Richard, Your absolutely right about changing some values and check the effect. Yesterday I only changed the NotifyBuffer to NotifyBufferSize=0x0040 but this night it crashed again... jbberror.log: 03/25/2003 01:16:54 Error updating the journal for fs D:, rc = -1, errno = 27 03/25/2003 01:16:56 JbbMonitorThread(): DB Access thread, tid 469 ended with return code 215. Strangest thing is that it crashed during night, during backup of that filesystem (backup of this drive takes from 23:00 to 04:04) So I wondered about the other value and what is was for and if it can do any harm (i.e. miss a backup when actually the file has changed). Kind regards, Adrie van Tuyl TSM Client 4.2.2.0.Win NT SP 6a TSM Server 4.2.2.6 Win NT SP 6a Adrie So, attribute changes (0x0004) are now not notified... Is this due to a virus checking application? My memory isn't exact (it's old age creeping on, probably), but yes, I think it was because of the virus check. Whatever the reason, it doesn't seem to harm us. But my main points were 1) it's the memory size that is most important 2) you can also cut down on notifications as well You must always check for yourself to see if changing a value will have a bad effect in your environment. Our environment is a *very* stable server (basically, it's just a load of online reference documents). And the few changes that do take place are not critical - in the extreme, we can always recreate the server from other sources. Thus we do not care too much if we miss a few changes. But not everyone will want that. Richard Foster Norsk Hydro asa Bestand: ATT793995.txt This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been checked by McAfee Groupshield for the presence of computer viruses.
days in scripting
Hi all, We have a daily tsm script which checks for missed backups, missed events, filesystems backupped longer then 24 hours ago etc. Weekends we do not backup all of our servers, so the check should be for last friday and not for sunday. Is there a way to implement the current day and do a jump depending on the current day? For instance: if 'today=monday' goto q ev * * begind=-3 else q ev * * begind=-1 Thanks, Adrie TSM Server 4.2.2.6 on Win NT 4 SP 6a This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been checked by McAfee Groupshield for the presence of computer viruses.
Re: File scan takes ages during backup
Correct me if I am wrong, but: standard filter setting is 0x0117 IBM support asked you to change it to 0x0113 So, attribute changes (0x0004) are now not notified... Is this due to a virus checking application? -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Magura, Curtis [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden:maandag 24 maart 2003 16:13 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp:Re: File scan takes ages during backup From the tsmjbbd.ini file where the client is installed: ; NotifyFilter ; ; Specifies what types of filesystem activity to monitor for ; a journaled filesystem. ; ; Multiple activities may be monitored by combining (logical OR) ; values. ; ; The default value is 0x117 (File and Dir name changes, ; last write changes, attribute changes, size changes, and ; security changes). ; ; ; Notification Type Filter Value ; ; File name changes, including create, 0x0001 ; delete and rename ; ; Dir name changes, including create,0x0002 ; delete, and rename ; ; Attribute changes 0x0004 ; ; Size changes, notification is deferred 0x0008 ; until cache is flushed ; ; Last written time changes, notification0x0010 ; is defered until cache is flushed ; ; Last access time changes 0x0020 ; ; Creation time changes 0x0040 ; ; Security changes 0x0100 Curt Magura Lockheed Martin EIS Orlando Fla. 321-235-1203 -Original Message- From: Richard Foster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 10:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: File scan takes ages during backup Al You asked Geoff, but I'll reply :) Did IBM say why the notifyfilter parameter was significant? I'm curious what that controls. If I remember correctly, IBM said that it controls exactly which events get notified to the journal service. If your journal buffer is filling up, you want to cut out unnecessary events. But I can't remember where they define which bit corresponds to which event. Richard Foster Norsk Hydro asa This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been checked by McAfee Groupshield for the presence of computer viruses.
statistics about active and inactive data
Hi, Is there a safe way of displaying the amount of active data and inactive data of a node? In the BACKUPS table the state of an abject is stored, but not the size of the object. Besides that I don't think a (joined) select on the BACKUPS table is a good idea considering the amount of data in this table. Anyone an idea? Thanks, Adrie This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been checked by McAfee Groupshield for the presence of computer viruses.
Re: Backup Files and directories over than 255 characters
Hi, This usally happens when you move a directory where an already long named file resides (but not yet at the limit) some directories deeper. The filesystem actually permits you to move the directory, it is only a change of a mountpoint of that directory, but the file itself grows beyond the limits of the NT filesystem. Good change you cannot read the file now or change it's name at its actual place and state! You could move the directory in which the file resides to a higher level, than rename the file, and move the directory back to its original place Good luck! Adrie -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Christian Renaudineau [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Verzonden:donderdag 30 januari 2003 10:31 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp:Backup Files and directories over than 255 characters Hi all, We use TSM v4, r1 level 1.16 We cannot backup successfully files and directories who have length over than 255 characters. TSM Client run on WINDOWS NT4 SP6. Do you know a workaround? Any references? Any experiences like us? Thanks for help, Regards. Christian. ** Le contenu de ce message ainsi que toute pihce jointe sont confidentiels. Il est riservi uniquement au(x) destinataire(s) mentionni(s). Si vous recevez ce message par erreur, veuillez privenir votre administrateur systhme ou l'expiditeur immidiatement, et ne pas en divulguer le contenu ou en faire des copies. ** eSafe a verifii ce message pour les virus, vandales et code malicieux ** ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been checked by McAfee Groupshield for the presence of computer viruses.
Re: restoring exchange in seperate environment
Exchange 5.5. -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Ochs, Duane [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Verzonden:dinsdag 14 januari 2003 17:54 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp:Re: restoring exchange in seperate environment Which version of Exchange is being used ? E2K ? -Original Message- From: Tuyl Adrie, A.C. van [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 9:18 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: restoring exchange in seperate environment Hi Storage experts, What is the safest way to restore an exchange server in a seperate environment (to extract one mailbox for instance). My Exchange Administrator doesn't have full confidence that the method described in the manual, i.e. restoring in the same domain, but without joining an existing site is safe. He's afraid of double connectors, double mail etc, double servers in the site etc. Do you have any experience with this? Is there a method of restoring only the edb's and tracking log file's? TSM Server 4.2.2.6 Windows NT TDP for Exchange 2.2.0.0 BA Client 4.2.2.0 Regards, Adrie van Tuyl ** ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been checked by McAfee Groupshield for the presence of computer viruses. ** ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been checked by McAfee Groupshield for the presence of computer viruses.
