Re: Extend DB

2002-06-11 Thread VALERIE FISHER

Hello,

I have done these 3 steps successfully but now I am trying to DEFINE
DBCOPY.
The documentation says   DEFINE DBCOPY volume_name copy_vol_name
When I do this adsm comes back with copy_vol_name is not available


Now what?

Val

-Original Message-
From: Zlatko Krastev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 3:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Extend DB


Kelli,

just three steps:
1. Create raw volume (mklv -y volume name -t tsmdbvol volume group
size in partitions) or file volume (dsmfmt -g -db file name size in
GB). Commands have to be performed in AIX shell.
2. Define newly created volume to TSM - 'define dbvolume /dev/rvolume
name' or 'define dbvolume file name'. Command has to be performed from
administrative client session.
3. Extend the DB - 'extend db number of pages'

Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant




Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by:ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:

Subject:Extend DB

Can someone please give me the exact steps to add db space on TSM 4.1.5
running on AIX 4.3.3?  I am certainly not an AIX guru so please spare no
details!  My db is running at 88% and I have 0 for for Maximum Extension.
How do I go about doing this?




Thanks so much!

Kelli Jones
Chesterfield County Information Systems Technology
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
phone: 804-748-1951
fax: 804-748-1571



Re: Extend DB

2002-06-11 Thread VALERIE FISHER

No - I found out that I needed to do the dsmfmt command for the copy volume.
I'm all set.

Thanks for your help -- Val

-Original Message-
From: Steve Argersinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 2:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Extend DB


Did you do step 1 for the copy volume??

Steve Argersinger
Ruan Transportation

-Original Message-
From: VALERIE FISHER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Extend DB


Hello,

I have done these 3 steps successfully but now I am trying to DEFINE
DBCOPY.
The documentation says   DEFINE DBCOPY volume_name copy_vol_name
When I do this adsm comes back with copy_vol_name is not available


Now what?

Val

-Original Message-
From: Zlatko Krastev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 3:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Extend DB


Kelli,

just three steps:
1. Create raw volume (mklv -y volume name -t tsmdbvol volume group
size in partitions) or file volume (dsmfmt -g -db file name size in
GB). Commands have to be performed in AIX shell.
2. Define newly created volume to TSM - 'define dbvolume /dev/rvolume
name' or 'define dbvolume file name'. Command has to be performed from
administrative client session.
3. Extend the DB - 'extend db number of pages'

Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant




Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by:ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:

Subject:Extend DB

Can someone please give me the exact steps to add db space on TSM 4.1.5
running on AIX 4.3.3?  I am certainly not an AIX guru so please spare no
details!  My db is running at 88% and I have 0 for for Maximum Extension.
How do I go about doing this?




Thanks so much!

Kelli Jones
Chesterfield County Information Systems Technology
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
phone: 804-748-1951
fax: 804-748-1571



Preserving ownership - UNIX (AIX)

2002-03-19 Thread VALERIE FISHER

Hello,

I would like to know how we would go about preserving file ownership
of the files we need to restore.
We just returned from a D/R test and had problems starting some apps
since the file ownership
is not preserved when you do a retrieve of archives.

ADSM Server level 4.1.4.0  on AIX  4.3.3
Client level  4.1.4.0  - AIX

Val



Manager of Systems  Database Administration
Seneca Foods Corp
3736 S Main St
Marion, NY  14505
315-926-8148
315-926-8300 - fax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Preserving ownership - UNIX (AIX)

2002-03-19 Thread VALERIE FISHER

But we restore our original system with a mksysb which should have the same
UID's shouldn't it??




-Original Message-
From: Thomas Denier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 3:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Preserving ownership - UNIX (AIX)


 I would like to know how we would go about preserving file
ownership
 of the files we need to restore.
 We just returned from a D/R test and had problems starting some
apps
 since the file ownership
 is not preserved when you do a retrieve of archives.

 ADSM Server level 4.1.4.0  on AIX  4.3.3
 Client level  4.1.4.0  - AIX

We have sometimes seen anomalies like this on cross-system restores. The
restore recreated the numeric user and group assignments the files had on
their original host. Unfortunately, the /etc/passwd file on the target
system had a different mapping between numeric user IDs and user names
than the /etc/passwd file on the original host, and the /etc/group file
had a different mapping between numeric group IDs and group names.



Re: DB Backups to specific tapes

2002-02-06 Thread VALERIE FISHER

Can this also be done with archives ?



-Original Message-
From: Nicholas Cassimatis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 4:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: DB Backups to specific tapes


Just list the volumes in the database backup command:

backup db type=full devc=yourdevclasshere vol=volser

To make this even easier, you can have a pool of volumes to use, in a comma
separated list:

backup db type=full devc=yourdevclasshere
vol=vol1,vol2,vol3,vol4,vol5,vol6,vol7

TSM will go along the list until it finds a volume it can use for the
backup.  So if, with the command above, vol1 and vol2 already have
dbbackups on them, TSM would use vol3.  You'll want more volumes than
you'll be keeping versions of your database, so you don't starve the
database backup process for tapes (I've been told if none of the listed
volumes are available, TSM will grab a scratch tape, but I've never tested
that).  So if you keep 7 versions of your database backup, you'll want at
least 7 (I'd recommend 10) tapes, to protect against bad tapes, mistaken
checkouts, or other issues.

Also, make sure the volumes that you want to use are checked in as Private,
not Scratch.

Nick Cassimatis
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Today is the tomorrow of yesterday.



Re: Archive problems

2001-09-06 Thread Valerie Fisher

Don't know if this would help your platform but when I upgraded from ADSM
3.1 on AIX to 4.1.4.0 we had the same slowness -
were advised from the TSM support folks to execute these commands on the TSM
server on AIX
and the 3 clients it serves from the dsmc prompt.

clean archdir (nodename) delete duplicates

convert archive (nodename) reorg=yes

and it did make the archive of many files go faster.

Good luck !

-Original Message-
From: Hunley, Ike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 5:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Archive problems


Hi,

I hope someone else out there has had this problem.  I need answers pronto!

TSM 4.3.1 is on OS/390 V2R9, AIX TSM is 3.1.06

Archive is SLOW!  Sometimes the process stops for no reason we can find.
File sizes range from 80 bytes to 800MB.

   5 byte file: 4.17 seconds
6,144,000 byte file 7.15 seconds





Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida, Inc., and its subsidiary and
affiliate companies are not responsible for errors or omissions in this
e-mail message. Any personal comments made in this e-mail do not reflect the
views of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida, Inc.



volume dismount

2001-08-29 Thread Valerie Fisher

Hello,
Has anyone seen this error when a tape is dismounting??

   We are on TSM Version 4.1.40 on AIX 4.3.3.




08/29/01   09:52:27  ANR8325I Dismounting volume ADSM26 - 60 minute mount

  retention expired.

08/29/01   09:52:27  ANR8336I Verifying label of 3570 volume ADSM26 in drive

  3570TAPE_1 (/dev/rmt1).

08/29/01   09:52:44  ANR8311E An I/O error occurred while accessing drive

  3570TAPE_1 (/dev/rmt1) for GETLOGSENSE operation,
errno =
  22.



Re: 3590 Tape Drive Errors

2001-08-28 Thread Valerie Fisher

Yes - we cleaned the drive which helped but it may also be an old tape that
needs to be replaced.

-Original Message-
From: Bruce Kamp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 10:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 3590 Tape Drive Errors


Has anybody seen these errors before?  IBM has been here many times 
replaced the read/write heads  loaded the latest micro code on the drives
but I keep getting them.

---
LABEL:  SIM_MIM_RECORD_3590
IDENTIFIER: D1A1AE6F

Date/Time:   Tue Aug 28 07:42:06
Sequence Number: 2770
Machine Id:  00012953A300
Node Id: tsmserv
Class:   H
Type:INFO
Resource Name:   rmt4
Resource Class:  tape
Resource Type:   3590
Location:00-08-01-3,0
VPD:
ManufacturerIBM
Machine Type and Model..03590E1A
Serial Number...000F3420
Device Specific.(FW)E32E
Loadable Microcode LevelA0B00E26

Description
TAPE SIM/MIM RECORD

Probable Causes
TAPE DRIVE
Failure Causes
TAPE DRIVE

Recommended Actions
REFER TO PRODUCT DOCUMENTATION FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Detail Data
DIAGNOSTIC EXPLANATION
3100 0044  6140 0130 3030 3030 3030 3233 3245 3537 3030 3941 3030 3030
3030
4646 4335 3539 4335 3539 3830 3030 4942 4D31 332D 3030 3030 3030 3046 3334
3230
3033 3539 3045 3141
---
LABEL:  TAPE_DRIVE_CLEANING
IDENTIFIER: E507DCF9

Date/Time:   Tue Aug 28 07:39:03
Sequence Number: 2769
Machine Id:  00012953A300
Node Id: tsmserv
Class:   H
Type:INFO
Resource Name:   rmt4
Resource Class:  tape
Resource Type:   3590
Location:00-08-01-3,0
VPD:
ManufacturerIBM
Machine Type and Model..03590E1A
Serial Number...000F3420
Device Specific.(FW)E32E
Loadable Microcode LevelA0B00E26

Description
TAPE DRIVE NEEDS CLEANING

Probable Causes
TAPE DRIVE

Failure Causes
TAPE DRIVE

Recommended Actions
CLEAN TAPE DRIVE

Detail Data
SENSE DATA
0603  1B00      0102  7000 0100  0058 

0017 FF03 C94B 4033 0005 0140    1B00     

             8000 3332
4520
2020 2000             

             
---

--
Bruce Kamp
Network Analyst II
Memorial Healthcare System
P: (954)987-2020 x6008
F: (954)985-2274
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: TSM Bare Restore AIX Different Arch

2001-08-23 Thread Valerie Fisher

We do our mksysb's to the same tape drive that TSM uses.
We bring down the TSM server so that it does not own the tape device anymore
and then start the mksysb backup.
Haven't had a problem with at all.  Have tested this at our DR hotsite and
works fine.


-Original Message-
From: Prather, Wanda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 2:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM Bare Restore AIX Different Arch


We do the mksysb's to disk.  Then TSM backs them up.
Then we only need the tape version of mksysb for the TSM server itself.

There is also a companion product to TSM called Bare-Metal restore, that
will take care of this stuff for you.
There is a link to the BMR info on the TSM home page:
http://www.tivoli.com/products/index/storage_mgr/



-Original Message-
From: Dave Z [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 10:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TSM Bare Restore AIX Different Arch


Folks,

I apologize if this is a FAQ

(I cannot find a complete documented procedure)

:0(


Currently, we use the following procedure to restore systems:

1) Restore the OS using the cloaner method as published by IBM:
   a) Boot off of the AIX installation media
   b) Restore system from tape (mksysb)
  (This allows you to recover the OS to dissimilar hardware)
2) Reconstruct the network (including the TSM backup network).
3) Restore all application data (and system data if needed) via TSM.

This methodology does not support a true DR test as our mksysb tapes are
not cut regularly or vaulted.

Unfortunately we do not have a solution that allows us to cut bootable AIX
tapes on a regular basis.  (Not all of the systems have local tape drives.
The procedure can not be automated. etc.)

In the future we must restore all RS/6000s with only our vaulted
installation media (OS and TSM) as well as our vaulted TSM tapes.  Due to
this we must develop procedures for a total bare metal restore of an
RS/6000 using only the OS installation media, TSM backup tapes, and any
relevant TSM disaster recovery reports.

We would like to develop a procedure that details the recovery of a generic
RS/6000 using only installation media, TSM backup, and disaster recovery
reports.

Ideas/Things to consider:

We can not assume that we will recover systems to identical hardware.  As
such we can not simply install a base OS and restore.
 What system files (/etc/passwd, /etc/hosts, etc...) are relevant to the
recovery of the system.
 What system files should not be recovered?  (I.e. kernel, driver specific,
etc.)


Can anyone help with any existing procedures or point me in the proper
direction?

Thanks!


DaveZ



Re: TSM 4.2 (AIX), licensing..

2001-08-15 Thread Valerie Fisher

Tom - I had the same problem - you need to remove the nodelock file and
re-register. Re-issuing the command
without removing the nodelock file just increases the number.



-Original Message-
From: Tom Tann{s [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 9:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TSM 4.2 (AIX), licensing..


Hello!

I upgraded a server from 4.1 to 4.2 today.

I've only managed to register one 50mgsyslan.lic whith the command
register lic file=50mgsyslan.lic number=12

additional attempts toregister more result in the same..

tsm: SUMOregister license file=50mgsyslan.lic
ANR2852I Current license information:
ANR2827I Server is licensed to support Managed System for LAN for a
quantity of 60.
ANR2853I New license information:
ANR2827I Server is licensed to support Managed System for LAN for a
quantity of 60.

tsm: SUMO

(Its 60 now because I successfully registered one 10mgsyslan.lic)


After several attempts I took a look at the nodelock-file, and this file
seems to be updated correctly, with one entry for each of my attempts..

.
.
.
.
# Managed System for LAN 50 Licen
6fb1ea8d2ebc.a3.89.a3.25.04.00.00.00 8umtikm47qkykpffafnaa  4.2
#[admin_comment]   0 0 0
# Managed System for LAN 50 Licen
6fb1ea8d2ebc.a3.89.a3.25.04.00.00.00 8umtikm47qkykpffafnaa  4.2
#[admin_comment]   0 0 0




So... Could this be a bug, or am I missing something here?