Re: 3584 - to partition or not . . .
This sounds like a design question. Based on what you described, if you currently have free cycles and eventually you will do it later on, if you do the work now, you have less work later on. So that makes sense to me. When you do partition the library, you also have to assign tape drive(s) and allocate # of slots. These resources won't be in use(idle) . Since projection of data usage and need can change over night, I would wait until the need arises. Sung Y. Lee "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 03/17/2006 07:18:08 AM: > We are about ready to setup a 3584 library for the first time. > > The 3584 will be shared between 3 tsm instances (2 production instances and > a library mgr instance) using tsm library sharing. At this time we do not > need any logical libraries, but there are several projects coming that may > make logical libraries desirable (hsm for Windows, getting rid Omniback by > moving clients to TSM, some archiving applications). > > Given the possibility of using logical libraries in the future, does it > make sense to partition the 3584 into a single logical library now, or, is > it better to wait until the need arises? > > Thanks > > Rick > > > - > The information contained in this message is intended only for the > personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If > the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an > agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you > are hereby notified that you have received this document in error > and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of > this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this > communication in error, please notify us immediately, and delete > the original message.
Re: 3584 - to partition or not . . .
On Fri, 17 Mar 2006, Richard Rhodes wrote: Given the possibility of using logical libraries in the future, does it make sense to partition the 3584 into a single logical library now, or, is it better to wait until the need arises? Repartitioning it is pretty quick, but the big problem is clients may not see the changes until they do whatever kind of reconfiguration is necessary. On Linux, we would typically reboot the attached servers after reconfiguring the library. --Jim
3584 - to partition or not . . .
We are about ready to setup a 3584 library for the first time. The 3584 will be shared between 3 tsm instances (2 production instances and a library mgr instance) using tsm library sharing. At this time we do not need any logical libraries, but there are several projects coming that may make logical libraries desirable (hsm for Windows, getting rid Omniback by moving clients to TSM, some archiving applications). Given the possibility of using logical libraries in the future, does it make sense to partition the 3584 into a single logical library now, or, is it better to wait until the need arises? Thanks Rick - The information contained in this message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately, and delete the original message.
