Re: 3590 tape compress question
When client compression is turned on, the data is already arriving to the TSM server in a compressed state. The 3590 may indeed be trying to compress this data again, but compressed data does not compress very well, so this is why you see the misleading utilization. Keep in mind though, that the data is *still* compressed. It's just a matter of who is doing the compression (software or hardware). The 40 - 50 GB on cartridge that you were seeing may very well represent 100 or more GB of uncompressed data. So your cartridge that shows 50 GB used is still actually housing 100 GB. So either way, you are getting the benefits of compression. Now the question becomes who you want to do the compression. Choosing to use or not use client compression can have an impact on your entire network. In general, client compression requires more overhead on the client system, but can help save on network bandwidth... but you may get misleading stats on your tape utilization. It's a matter of understanding that the 40 - 50 GB you see on the tape represents 100 GB or more of real client data. And don't forget to test restore performance, because restores may be slower if the client has to decompress the data before putting it back to disk. On the other hand, if network bandwidth is not an issue, then let the hardware do the work of compression. I am sure others can convey their experiences with client vs. hardware compression. My main point is that just because you see lower cartridge utilization does not necessarily mean you are not gaining the benefits of compression; it's just a matter of where the compression is happening. Also, and perhaps more important, is to understand the potential impact to your network of turning client compression on or off. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM/Tivoli Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] "The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked." This is an update to a post I made some 10 days ago. I was looking for 3590 extended length cartridges to show capacity numbers indicating decent compression was going on. ... What I found was a ClientOptionSet that indicated Compression=Yes. Therefore, the data I was receiving was already compressed and TSM could not store more than 40-50GB on a cartridge. I turned this option off and voila! This morning I have a cartridge that shows a capacity of 107GB. Decent compression indeed!!! Thanks to all who responded, John Talafous Information Systems Technical Principal Global Software Support - Data Management telephone: (330)-471-3390 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ctnvm.inside.tkr/~talafous/ http://www.cis.corp.inside.tkr/networkstorage/
Re: 3590 tape compress question
Hi Tom and all, Our AIX is 4.3.3.0 and TSM server is 3.7.3.0. I have concerned about changing the tape device format setting, does anybody have such experience? Appreciated your help! Thanks, Phillip -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Melton Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2000 7:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 3590 tape compress question DRIVE is supposed to work the same as 3590E-C (I said below 3590-C, but 3590E-C is the correct value). What level of ADSM are you using? I think it was 3.1.2.30 or .40 that added support for the 3590E drives. -Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/12/00 07:52PM Hi Tom and all, Cool! I'll change it to get big capacity. What will happen if I change the setting? It is a production system and have about 1TB data on it. Thanks, Phillip -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Melton Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2000 6:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 3590 tape compress question Hi Phillip (and all), We use 3590E model drives in a 3494 ATL, and the vollowing is a Q VOL from my system: ANS8000I Server command: 'q vol stgpool=off2' Volume Name Storage Device EstimatedPct Volume Pool NameClass Name Capacity Util Status (MB) --- -- - - A00049OFF2 3590E-25630,933.1 88.1 Filling A00056OFF2 3590E-25692,626.5 49.9 Full A00060OFF2 3590E-256 0.00.0 Empty A00061OFF2 3590E-25680,586.3 48.3 Full A00062OFF2 3590E-25640,597.2 72.3 Full A00125OFF2 3590E-256 0.00.0 Empty A00126OFF2 3590E-256 116,093.3 96.4 Full A00127OFF2 3590E-25664,248.3 88.3 Full A00129OFF2 3590E-25648,621.5 81.1 Full A00131OFF2 3590E-25642,052.1 79.6 Full A00132OFF2 3590E-25666,512.8 75.5 Filling A00133OFF2 3590E-25620,000.0 44.6 Filling A00134OFF2 3590E-25684,387.7 72.2 Full A00139OFF2 3590E-256 143,692.8 100.0 Full A00142OFF2 3590E-25626,646.1 99.7 Filling A00143OFF2 3590E-25620,000.0 40.2 Filling We use the following definition for the device class: ANS8000I Server command: 'q devclass 3590*' Device DeviceStorageDevice Format Est/Max Mount ClassAccess PoolType Capacity Limit Name StrategyCount (MB) --------- -- 3590E-256Sequential 53590 3590E- 0.0 DRIVES -C So instead of "DRIVE" I specified 3590-C and as you can see, one tape above has 143 GB (compressed) data on it. Tom Melton Emory University Emory HealthCare [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/12/00 02:10PM Hi all, We have a 3494 tape library installed with 2 3590 tape drivers. We use 40GB tape cartridges ( compressed to 120GB). Here is the info: tsm: q dev DeviceDevice Storage DeviceFormat Est/Max Mount Class AccessPool Type Capacity Limit Name Strategy Count (MB) - -- --- - -- -- DISK Random 3 IBM3494D- Sequential 2 3590 DRIVE 0.0 DRIVES EV tsm: q vol Volume Name Storage Device Estimated Pct Volume Pool Name Class Name Capacity Util Status (MB) --- -- - -- --- /tsm/data1/tsmdata.001 BACKUPPOOL DISK15,360.0 69.4 On-Line /tsm/data1/tsmdata.002 BACKUPPOOL DISK15,360.0 59.7 On-Line /tsm/data1/tsmdata.003 BACKUPPOOL DISK15,360.0 55.7 On-Line /tsm/data1/tsmdata.004 BACKUPPOOL DISK15,360.0 68.7 On-Line /tsm/data1/tsmdata.005 BACKUPPOOL DISK15,360.0 62.4 On-Line /tsm/data1/tsmdata.006 BACKUPPOOL DISK15,360.0 69.1 On-Line /tsm/data1/tsmdata.007 BACKUPPOOL DISK15,360.0 65.5 On-Line /tsm/data1/tsmdata.008 BACKUPPOOL DISK15,
Re: 3590 tape compress question
We have a 3466-C00, AIX 4.3.2 and TSM 3.7.1. We have a 3494 library with 3590E1A drives with extended length capability. I changed the DEVCLASS for the tapes to 3590E-C. I then performed an EXPIRE INVENTORY and lowered reclamation thresholds The first scratch tape mounted for reclamation just reached EOV. After dismounting, I queried the tape with these results: tsm: FSPHNSM1q volume k20511 f=d Volume Name: K20511 Storage Pool Name: SERVER_COPY Device Class Name: 3590-E1A Estimated Capacity (MB): 38,756.9 Pct Util: 100.0 Volume Status: Full Access: Read/Write Pct. Reclaimable Space: 0.0 Scratch Volume?: Yes In Error State?: No Number of Writable Sides: 1 Number of Times Mounted: 1 Write Pass Number: 1 Approx. Date Last Written: 10/13/2000 12:01:10 Approx. Date Last Read: 10/13/2000 10:30:17 Date Became Pending: Number of Write Errors: 0 Number of Read Errors: 0 Volume Location: Last Update by (administrator): Last Update Date/Time: 10/13/2000 10:30:02 more... (ENTER to continue, 'C' to cancel) I may be dealing with the wrong type of data, but I see no compression here. I guess if I don't see any compression results this weekend, it's time to call support. Any other ideas? John G. Talafous IS Technical Principal The Timken CompanyPhone: (330)-471-3390 P.O. Box 6927 Fax : (330)-471-4034 1835 Dueber Ave. S.W. Canton, Ohio USA 44706-0927 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.timken.com/ -Original Message- From: Phillip Guan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 13, 2000 11:54 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 3590 tape compress question Hi Tom and all, Our AIX is 4.3.3.0 and TSM server is 3.7.3.0. I have concerned about changing the tape device format setting, does anybody have such experience? Appreciated your help! Thanks, Phillip -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Melton Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2000 7:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 3590 tape compress question DRIVE is supposed to work the same as 3590E-C (I said below 3590-C, but 3590E-C is the correct value). What level of ADSM are you using? I think it was 3.1.2.30 or .40 that added support for the 3590E drives. -Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/12/00 07:52PM Hi Tom and all, Cool! I'll change it to get big capacity. What will happen if I change the setting? It is a production system and have about 1TB data on it. Thanks, Phillip -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Melton Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2000 6:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 3590 tape compress question Hi Phillip (and all), We use 3590E model drives in a 3494 ATL, and the vollowing is a Q VOL from my system: ANS8000I Server command: 'q vol stgpool=off2' Volume Name Storage Device EstimatedPct Volume Pool NameClass Name Capacity Util Status (MB) --- -- - - A00049OFF2 3590E-25630,933.1 88.1 Filling A00056OFF2 3590E-25692,626.5 49.9 Full A00060OFF2 3590E-256 0.00.0 Empty A00061OFF2 3590E-25680,586.3 48.3 Full A00062OFF2 3590E-25640,597.2 72.3 Full A00125OFF2 3590E-256 0.00.0 Empty A00126OFF2 3590E-256 116,093.3 96.4 Full A00127OFF2 3590E-25664,248.3 88.3 Full A00129OFF2 3590E-25648,621.5 81.1 Full A00131OFF2 3590E-25642,052.1 79.6 Full A00132OFF2 3590E-25666,512.8 75.5 Filling A00133OFF2 3590E-25620,000.0 44.6 Filling A00134OFF2 3590E-25684,387.7 72.2 Full A00139OFF2 3590E-256 143,692.8 100.0 Full A00142OFF2 3590E-25626,646.1 99.7 Filling A00143OFF2 3590E-25620,000.0 40.2 Filling We use the following definition for the device class: ANS8000I Server command: 'q devclass 3590*' Device DeviceStorageDevice Format Est/Max Mount ClassAccess PoolType Capacity Limit Name StrategyCount (MB) --------- -- 3590E-256Sequential
3590 tape compress question
Hi all, We have a 3494 tape library installed with 2 3590 tape drivers. We use 40GB tape cartridges ( compressed to 120GB). Here is the info: tsm: q dev DeviceDevice Storage DeviceFormat Est/Max Mount Class AccessPool Type Capacity Limit Name Strategy Count (MB) - -- --- - -- -- DISK Random 3 IBM3494D- Sequential 2 3590 DRIVE 0.0 DRIVES EV tsm: q vol Volume Name Storage Device Estimated Pct Volume Pool Name Class Name Capacity Util Status (MB) --- -- - -- --- /tsm/data1/tsmdata.001 BACKUPPOOL DISK15,360.0 69.4 On-Line /tsm/data1/tsmdata.002 BACKUPPOOL DISK15,360.0 59.7 On-Line /tsm/data1/tsmdata.003 BACKUPPOOL DISK15,360.0 55.7 On-Line /tsm/data1/tsmdata.004 BACKUPPOOL DISK15,360.0 68.7 On-Line /tsm/data1/tsmdata.005 BACKUPPOOL DISK15,360.0 62.4 On-Line /tsm/data1/tsmdata.006 BACKUPPOOL DISK15,360.0 69.1 On-Line /tsm/data1/tsmdata.007 BACKUPPOOL DISK15,360.0 65.5 On-Line /tsm/data1/tsmdata.008 BACKUPPOOL DISK15,360.0 62.5 On-Line /tsm/data1/tsmdata.009 BACKUPPOOL DISK15,360.0 59.5 On-Line /tsm/data1/tsmdata.010 BACKUPPOOL DISK15,360.0 69.7 On-Line /tsm/data1/tsmdata.011 BACKUPPOOL DISK15,360.0 62.5 On-Line /tsm/data1/tsmdata.012 BACKUPPOOL DISK15,360.0 70.3 On-Line /tsm/data1/tsmdata.013 BACKUPPOOL DISK15,360.0 58.4 On-Line 000503 TAPEPOOLIBM3494DEV 37,084.1 80.9 Full 000504 TAPEPOOLIBM3494DEV 20,000.0 64.9 Filling 000506 RECLAIMPOOL IBM3494DEV 23,361.6 0.0 Filling 000508 TAPEPOOLIBM3494DEV 36,269.8 100.0 Full 000509 TAPEPOOLIBM3494DEV 36,024.0 100.0 Full 000510 TAPEPOOLIBM3494DEV 20,000.0 49.1 Filling 000511 TAPEPOOLIBM3494DEV 20,000.0 54.8 Filling 000512 TAPEPOOLIBM3494DEV 20,000.0 51.7 Filling 000513 TAPEPOOLIBM3494DEV 35,239.2 100.0 Filling 000514 TAPEPOOLIBM3494DEV 35,988.0 100.0 Full 000516 TAPEPOOLIBM3494DEV 35,978.1 100.0 Full 000517 TAPEPOOLIBM3494DEV 35,905.2 100.0 Full 000518 TAPEPOOLIBM3494DEV 36,028.3 100.0 Full 000520 TAPEPOOLIBM3494DEV 20,000.0 47.3 Filling 000521 TAPEPOOLIBM3494DEV 20,000.0 79.2 Filling 000522 TAPEPOOLIBM3494DEV 20,000.0 58.7 Filling 000523 TAPEPOOLIBM3494DEV 20,000.0 36.1 Filling 000526 TAPEPOOLIBM3494DEV 20,000.0 47.7 Filling 000527 TAPEPOOLIBM3494DEV 20,000.0 83.0 Filling 000528 TAPEPOOLIBM3494DEV 20,000.0 41.0 Filling 000529 TAPEPOOLIBM3494DEV 20,000.0 34.3 Filling Question: We set the device fromat to be 'DRIVE' which means use the highest format that it supports, does it mean it uses HW compress? Form the 'q vol' output, it seems it uses as 40GB. How do we 'turn on' the HW compress if it is not compressed? Thanks in advance for your help. Best regards, Phillip Guan
Re: 3590 tape compress question
Hi Maria/Richard, No, we didn't turned on compress on the client. Thanks for the info. Phillip -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Maria Paz Gimeno Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2000 1:43 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RV: 3590 tape compress question Do you have compresion turned on in the client? In that case the hardware can not compress more. Regards Maria
Re: 3590 tape compress question
Hi Phillip (and all), We use 3590E model drives in a 3494 ATL, and the vollowing is a Q VOL from my system: ANS8000I Server command: 'q vol stgpool=off2' Volume Name Storage Device EstimatedPct Volume Pool NameClass Name Capacity Util Status (MB) --- -- - - A00049OFF2 3590E-25630,933.1 88.1 Filling A00056OFF2 3590E-25692,626.5 49.9 Full A00060OFF2 3590E-256 0.00.0 Empty A00061OFF2 3590E-25680,586.3 48.3 Full A00062OFF2 3590E-25640,597.2 72.3 Full A00125OFF2 3590E-256 0.00.0 Empty A00126OFF2 3590E-256 116,093.3 96.4 Full A00127OFF2 3590E-25664,248.3 88.3 Full A00129OFF2 3590E-25648,621.5 81.1 Full A00131OFF2 3590E-25642,052.1 79.6 Full A00132OFF2 3590E-25666,512.8 75.5 Filling A00133OFF2 3590E-25620,000.0 44.6 Filling A00134OFF2 3590E-25684,387.7 72.2 Full A00139OFF2 3590E-256 143,692.8 100.0 Full A00142OFF2 3590E-25626,646.1 99.7 Filling A00143OFF2 3590E-25620,000.0 40.2 Filling We use the following definition for the device class: ANS8000I Server command: 'q devclass 3590*' Device DeviceStorageDevice Format Est/Max Mount ClassAccess PoolType Capacity Limit Name StrategyCount (MB) --------- -- 3590E-256Sequential 53590 3590E- 0.0 DRIVES -C So instead of "DRIVE" I specified 3590-C and as you can see, one tape above has 143 GB (compressed) data on it. Tom Melton Emory University Emory HealthCare [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/12/00 02:10PM Hi all, We have a 3494 tape library installed with 2 3590 tape drivers. We use 40GB tape cartridges ( compressed to 120GB). Here is the info: tsm: q dev DeviceDevice Storage DeviceFormat Est/Max Mount Class AccessPool Type Capacity Limit Name Strategy Count (MB) - -- --- - -- -- DISK Random 3 IBM3494D- Sequential 2 3590 DRIVE 0.0 DRIVES EV tsm: q vol Volume Name Storage Device Estimated Pct Volume Pool Name Class Name Capacity Util Status (MB) --- -- - -- --- /tsm/data1/tsmdata.001 BACKUPPOOL DISK15,360.0 69.4 On-Line /tsm/data1/tsmdata.002 BACKUPPOOL DISK15,360.0 59.7 On-Line /tsm/data1/tsmdata.003 BACKUPPOOL DISK15,360.0 55.7 On-Line /tsm/data1/tsmdata.004 BACKUPPOOL DISK15,360.0 68.7 On-Line /tsm/data1/tsmdata.005 BACKUPPOOL DISK15,360.0 62.4 On-Line /tsm/data1/tsmdata.006 BACKUPPOOL DISK15,360.0 69.1 On-Line /tsm/data1/tsmdata.007 BACKUPPOOL DISK15,360.0 65.5 On-Line /tsm/data1/tsmdata.008 BACKUPPOOL DISK15,360.0 62.5 On-Line /tsm/data1/tsmdata.009 BACKUPPOOL DISK15,360.0 59.5 On-Line /tsm/data1/tsmdata.010 BACKUPPOOL DISK15,360.0 69.7 On-Line /tsm/data1/tsmdata.011 BACKUPPOOL DISK15,360.0 62.5 On-Line /tsm/data1/tsmdata.012 BACKUPPOOL DISK15,360.0 70.3 On-Line /tsm/data1/tsmdata.013 BACKUPPOOL DISK15,360.0 58.4 On-Line 000503 TAPEPOOLIBM3494DEV 37,084.1 80.9 Full 000504 TAPEPOOLIBM3494DEV 20,000.0 64.9 Filling 000506 RECLAIMPOOL IBM3494DEV 23,361.6 0.0 Filling 000508 TAPEPOOLIBM3494DEV 36,269.8 100.0 Full 000509 TAPEPOOLIBM3494DEV 36,024.0 100.0 Full 000510 TAPEPOOLIBM3494DEV 20,000.0 49.1 Filling 000511 TAPEPOOLIBM3494DEV 20,000.0 54.8 Filling 000512
Re: 3590 tape compress question
Hi Tom and all, Cool! I'll change it to get big capacity. What will happen if I change the setting? It is a production system and have about 1TB data on it. Thanks, Phillip -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Melton Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2000 6:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 3590 tape compress question Hi Phillip (and all), We use 3590E model drives in a 3494 ATL, and the vollowing is a Q VOL from my system: ANS8000I Server command: 'q vol stgpool=off2' Volume Name Storage Device EstimatedPct Volume Pool NameClass Name Capacity Util Status (MB) --- -- - - A00049OFF2 3590E-25630,933.1 88.1 Filling A00056OFF2 3590E-25692,626.5 49.9 Full A00060OFF2 3590E-256 0.00.0 Empty A00061OFF2 3590E-25680,586.3 48.3 Full A00062OFF2 3590E-25640,597.2 72.3 Full A00125OFF2 3590E-256 0.00.0 Empty A00126OFF2 3590E-256 116,093.3 96.4 Full A00127OFF2 3590E-25664,248.3 88.3 Full A00129OFF2 3590E-25648,621.5 81.1 Full A00131OFF2 3590E-25642,052.1 79.6 Full A00132OFF2 3590E-25666,512.8 75.5 Filling A00133OFF2 3590E-25620,000.0 44.6 Filling A00134OFF2 3590E-25684,387.7 72.2 Full A00139OFF2 3590E-256 143,692.8 100.0 Full A00142OFF2 3590E-25626,646.1 99.7 Filling A00143OFF2 3590E-25620,000.0 40.2 Filling We use the following definition for the device class: ANS8000I Server command: 'q devclass 3590*' Device DeviceStorageDevice Format Est/Max Mount ClassAccess PoolType Capacity Limit Name StrategyCount (MB) --------- -- 3590E-256Sequential 53590 3590E- 0.0 DRIVES -C So instead of "DRIVE" I specified 3590-C and as you can see, one tape above has 143 GB (compressed) data on it. Tom Melton Emory University Emory HealthCare [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/12/00 02:10PM Hi all, We have a 3494 tape library installed with 2 3590 tape drivers. We use 40GB tape cartridges ( compressed to 120GB). Here is the info: tsm: q dev DeviceDevice Storage DeviceFormat Est/Max Mount Class AccessPool Type Capacity Limit Name Strategy Count (MB) - -- --- - -- -- DISK Random 3 IBM3494D- Sequential 2 3590 DRIVE 0.0 DRIVES EV tsm: q vol Volume Name Storage Device Estimated Pct Volume Pool Name Class Name Capacity Util Status (MB) --- -- - -- --- /tsm/data1/tsmdata.001 BACKUPPOOL DISK15,360.0 69.4 On-Line /tsm/data1/tsmdata.002 BACKUPPOOL DISK15,360.0 59.7 On-Line /tsm/data1/tsmdata.003 BACKUPPOOL DISK15,360.0 55.7 On-Line /tsm/data1/tsmdata.004 BACKUPPOOL DISK15,360.0 68.7 On-Line /tsm/data1/tsmdata.005 BACKUPPOOL DISK15,360.0 62.4 On-Line /tsm/data1/tsmdata.006 BACKUPPOOL DISK15,360.0 69.1 On-Line /tsm/data1/tsmdata.007 BACKUPPOOL DISK15,360.0 65.5 On-Line /tsm/data1/tsmdata.008 BACKUPPOOL DISK15,360.0 62.5 On-Line /tsm/data1/tsmdata.009 BACKUPPOOL DISK15,360.0 59.5 On-Line /tsm/data1/tsmdata.010 BACKUPPOOL DISK15,360.0 69.7 On-Line /tsm/data1/tsmdata.011 BACKUPPOOL DISK15,360.0 62.5 On-Line /tsm/data1/tsmdata.012 BACKUPPOOL DISK15,360.0 70.3 On-Line /tsm/data1/tsmdata.013 BACKUPPOOL DISK15,360.0 58.4 On-Line 000503 TAPEPOOLIBM3494DEV 37,084.1 80.9 Full 000504 TAPEPOOLIBM3494DEV 20,000.0 64.9 Filling 000506 RECLAIMPOOL
Re: 3590 tape compress question
DRIVE is supposed to work the same as 3590E-C (I said below 3590-C, but 3590E-C is the correct value). What level of ADSM are you using? I think it was 3.1.2.30 or .40 that added support for the 3590E drives. -Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/12/00 07:52PM Hi Tom and all, Cool! I'll change it to get big capacity. What will happen if I change the setting? It is a production system and have about 1TB data on it. Thanks, Phillip -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Melton Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2000 6:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 3590 tape compress question Hi Phillip (and all), We use 3590E model drives in a 3494 ATL, and the vollowing is a Q VOL from my system: ANS8000I Server command: 'q vol stgpool=off2' Volume Name Storage Device EstimatedPct Volume Pool NameClass Name Capacity Util Status (MB) --- -- - - A00049OFF2 3590E-25630,933.1 88.1 Filling A00056OFF2 3590E-25692,626.5 49.9 Full A00060OFF2 3590E-256 0.00.0 Empty A00061OFF2 3590E-25680,586.3 48.3 Full A00062OFF2 3590E-25640,597.2 72.3 Full A00125OFF2 3590E-256 0.00.0 Empty A00126OFF2 3590E-256 116,093.3 96.4 Full A00127OFF2 3590E-25664,248.3 88.3 Full A00129OFF2 3590E-25648,621.5 81.1 Full A00131OFF2 3590E-25642,052.1 79.6 Full A00132OFF2 3590E-25666,512.8 75.5 Filling A00133OFF2 3590E-25620,000.0 44.6 Filling A00134OFF2 3590E-25684,387.7 72.2 Full A00139OFF2 3590E-256 143,692.8 100.0 Full A00142OFF2 3590E-25626,646.1 99.7 Filling A00143OFF2 3590E-25620,000.0 40.2 Filling We use the following definition for the device class: ANS8000I Server command: 'q devclass 3590*' Device DeviceStorageDevice Format Est/Max Mount ClassAccess PoolType Capacity Limit Name StrategyCount (MB) --------- -- 3590E-256Sequential 53590 3590E- 0.0 DRIVES -C So instead of "DRIVE" I specified 3590-C and as you can see, one tape above has 143 GB (compressed) data on it. Tom Melton Emory University Emory HealthCare [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/12/00 02:10PM Hi all, We have a 3494 tape library installed with 2 3590 tape drivers. We use 40GB tape cartridges ( compressed to 120GB). Here is the info: tsm: q dev DeviceDevice Storage DeviceFormat Est/Max Mount Class AccessPool Type Capacity Limit Name Strategy Count (MB) - -- --- - -- -- DISK Random 3 IBM3494D- Sequential 2 3590 DRIVE 0.0 DRIVES EV tsm: q vol Volume Name Storage Device Estimated Pct Volume Pool Name Class Name Capacity Util Status (MB) --- -- - -- --- /tsm/data1/tsmdata.001 BACKUPPOOL DISK15,360.0 69.4 On-Line /tsm/data1/tsmdata.002 BACKUPPOOL DISK15,360.0 59.7 On-Line /tsm/data1/tsmdata.003 BACKUPPOOL DISK15,360.0 55.7 On-Line /tsm/data1/tsmdata.004 BACKUPPOOL DISK15,360.0 68.7 On-Line /tsm/data1/tsmdata.005 BACKUPPOOL DISK15,360.0 62.4 On-Line /tsm/data1/tsmdata.006 BACKUPPOOL DISK15,360.0 69.1 On-Line /tsm/data1/tsmdata.007 BACKUPPOOL DISK15,360.0 65.5 On-Line /tsm/data1/tsmdata.008 BACKUPPOOL DISK15,360.0 62.5 On-Line /tsm/data1/tsmdata.009 BACKUPPOOL DISK15,360.0 59.5 On-Line /tsm/data1/tsmdata.010 BACKUPPOOL DISK15,360.0 69.7 On-Line /tsm/data1/tsmdata.011 BACKUPPOOL DISK15,360.0 62.5 On-Line /tsm/data1/tsmdata.012 BACKUPPOOL DISK15,360.0 70.3 On-Line /tsm/data1/tsmdata.013 BACKUPPOOL