Re: Apparent memory leak

2002-12-24 Thread William F. Colwell
Tom, I have seen the server get sluggish after running a long time,
and I suspect a memory leak was the cause.  I can't remember if 4.2.1.9
had the problem.  I am at 4.2.3.2 and it is running good.

Bill

At 11:37 AM 12/24/2002, you wrote:
>We are running a 4.2.1.9 TSM server under OS/390. We started seeing
>crippling performance problems when the database got up around 15
>gigabytes. Increases in bufpoolsize, region size, and available real
>memory (by shifting memory from another logical partition on the
>same processor complex) had only a temporary effect. It now appears
>that each time we stop and restart the server we get about one day
>of pretty good performance, followed by a day of margional performance,
>followed by one or more days of catostrophic performance. The buffer
>pool hit rate seems to decrease steadily after each restart. This
>pattern of behavior suggests a memory leak. Does the 4.2.1.9 server
>have known problems in this regard?

--
Bill Colwell
C. S. Draper Lab
Cambridge Ma.



Apparent memory leak

2002-12-24 Thread Thomas Denier
We are running a 4.2.1.9 TSM server under OS/390. We started seeing
crippling performance problems when the database got up around 15
gigabytes. Increases in bufpoolsize, region size, and available real
memory (by shifting memory from another logical partition on the
same processor complex) had only a temporary effect. It now appears
that each time we stop and restart the server we get about one day
of pretty good performance, followed by a day of margional performance,
followed by one or more days of catostrophic performance. The buffer
pool hit rate seems to decrease steadily after each restart. This
pattern of behavior suggests a memory leak. Does the 4.2.1.9 server
have known problems in this regard?