Cloned Win servers and multiple backups

2009-05-05 Thread Richard Rhodes
This is a strange problem.

Once in a while, our Windows support team will clone a Windows server.  The
clone will have the exact same TSM setup as the source server.  I'm not
familiar with the Win BA client, but it seems it always has a nodename line
for the dsm.sys file, so the clone reports to TSM server that it's the same
node as the clone source.  They both appear to respond to the same
schedule.   This results in the new server performing good backups to the
exact same node as the server that is the clone source.   The end result
seems to be to two different servers happily  backing up the same TSM node.
Obviously what we get is a useless mess.  When they clone a system they are
supposed to use a source without a TSM setup, or,  clean out the TSM setup
right away, but sometimes this doesn't happen.  I've tried to find a way to
detect this from the TSM server, but I'm not coming up with anything
obvious.   I'm interested if anyone else has fought this problem and what
you've done.

Thanks!

Rick


-
The information contained in this message is intended only for the
personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an
agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that you have received this document in error
and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of
this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately, and delete
the original message.


Re: Cloned Win servers and multiple backups

2009-05-05 Thread Schaub, Steve
You can setup a regular search in the TSM server actlog for the
following msgno (our specific data masked):

Date/TimeMessage


--
05/05/2009 08:00:15  ANR1639I Attributes changed for node :
TCP Name   
  from  to , TCP Address from
10.99.99.999  
  to 10.88.88.888, GUID from
99.99.99.99.99.99.11.dc.89.50.-
  00.11.25.9c.28.2c to
88.88.88.88.88.88.11.dc.ab.82.00.1a-
  .64.59.35.68. (SESSION: 1277591

Steve Schaub
Systems Engineer, Windows
BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Richard Rhodes
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 8:12 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Cloned Win servers and multiple backups

This is a strange problem.

Once in a while, our Windows support team will clone a Windows server.
The
clone will have the exact same TSM setup as the source server.  I'm not
familiar with the Win BA client, but it seems it always has a nodename
line
for the dsm.sys file, so the clone reports to TSM server that it's the
same
node as the clone source.  They both appear to respond to the same
schedule.   This results in the new server performing good backups to
the
exact same node as the server that is the clone source.   The end result
seems to be to two different servers happily  backing up the same TSM
node.
Obviously what we get is a useless mess.  When they clone a system they
are
supposed to use a source without a TSM setup, or,  clean out the TSM
setup
right away, but sometimes this doesn't happen.  I've tried to find a way
to
detect this from the TSM server, but I'm not coming up with anything
obvious.   I'm interested if anyone else has fought this problem and
what
you've done.

Thanks!

Rick


-
The information contained in this message is intended only for the
personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an
agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that you have received this document in error
and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of
this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately, and delete
the original message.

-
Please see the following link for the BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee E-mail 
disclaimer:  http://www.bcbst.com/email_disclaimer.shtm


Re: Cloned Win servers and multiple backups

2009-05-05 Thread Richard Sims

Rick -

Oh, Windows administrators, and their peculiar view of reality...

For your detection, from the TSM server:  If they did not also clone
the PC's IP address (!), then the GUID should be different for the
clone, where message ANR1639I should be expected in the TSM Activity
Log.

   Richard Sims


Re: Cloned Win servers and multiple backups

2009-05-05 Thread Len Boyle
Rick, 

If your hostnames are unique in of themselves, you can leave the nodename out 
of the dsm.opt file. TSM will use the hostname for the tsm nodename. 

If you have clients with the name of xyz.abc.com and xyz.qxr.com then you would 
have a problem with this scheme. 

len

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of 
Richard Rhodes
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 8:12 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Cloned Win servers and multiple backups

This is a strange problem.

Once in a while, our Windows support team will clone a Windows server.  The
clone will have the exact same TSM setup as the source server.  I'm not
familiar with the Win BA client, but it seems it always has a nodename line
for the dsm.sys file, so the clone reports to TSM server that it's the same
node as the clone source.  They both appear to respond to the same
schedule.   This results in the new server performing good backups to the
exact same node as the server that is the clone source.   The end result
seems to be to two different servers happily  backing up the same TSM node.
Obviously what we get is a useless mess.  When they clone a system they are
supposed to use a source without a TSM setup, or,  clean out the TSM setup
right away, but sometimes this doesn't happen.  I've tried to find a way to
detect this from the TSM server, but I'm not coming up with anything
obvious.   I'm interested if anyone else has fought this problem and what
you've done.

Thanks!

Rick


-
The information contained in this message is intended only for the
personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an
agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that you have received this document in error
and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of
this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately, and delete
the original message.


Re: Cloned Win servers and multiple backups

2009-05-05 Thread Tyree, David
I think this only work if you had open registration. 

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Len Boyle
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 9:09 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Cloned Win servers and multiple backups

Rick, 

If your hostnames are unique in of themselves, you can leave the
nodename out of the dsm.opt file. TSM will use the hostname for the tsm
nodename. 

If you have clients with the name of xyz.abc.com and xyz.qxr.com then
you would have a problem with this scheme. 

len

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Richard Rhodes
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 8:12 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Cloned Win servers and multiple backups

This is a strange problem.

Once in a while, our Windows support team will clone a Windows server.
The
clone will have the exact same TSM setup as the source server.  I'm not
familiar with the Win BA client, but it seems it always has a nodename
line
for the dsm.sys file, so the clone reports to TSM server that it's the
same
node as the clone source.  They both appear to respond to the same
schedule.   This results in the new server performing good backups to
the
exact same node as the server that is the clone source.   The end result
seems to be to two different servers happily  backing up the same TSM
node.
Obviously what we get is a useless mess.  When they clone a system they
are
supposed to use a source without a TSM setup, or,  clean out the TSM
setup
right away, but sometimes this doesn't happen.  I've tried to find a way
to
detect this from the TSM server, but I'm not coming up with anything
obvious.   I'm interested if anyone else has fought this problem and
what
you've done.

Thanks!

Rick


-
The information contained in this message is intended only for the
personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an
agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that you have received this document in error
and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of
this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately, and delete
the original message.


Re: Cloned Win servers and multiple backups

2009-05-05 Thread Remco Post

On 5 mei 2009, at 16:37, Tyree, David wrote:


I think this only work if you had open registration.



no, open registration and the default nodename are unrelated.


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On
Behalf Of
Len Boyle
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 9:09 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Cloned Win servers and multiple backups

Rick,

If your hostnames are unique in of themselves, you can leave the
nodename out of the dsm.opt file. TSM will use the hostname for the
tsm
nodename.

If you have clients with the name of xyz.abc.com and xyz.qxr.com then
you would have a problem with this scheme.

len

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On
Behalf Of
Richard Rhodes
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 8:12 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Cloned Win servers and multiple backups

This is a strange problem.

Once in a while, our Windows support team will clone a Windows server.
The
clone will have the exact same TSM setup as the source server.  I'm
not
familiar with the Win BA client, but it seems it always has a nodename
line
for the dsm.sys file, so the clone reports to TSM server that it's the
same
node as the clone source.  They both appear to respond to the same
schedule.   This results in the new server performing good backups to
the
exact same node as the server that is the clone source.   The end
result
seems to be to two different servers happily  backing up the same TSM
node.
Obviously what we get is a useless mess.  When they clone a system
they
are
supposed to use a source without a TSM setup, or,  clean out the TSM
setup
right away, but sometimes this doesn't happen.  I've tried to find a
way
to
detect this from the TSM server, but I'm not coming up with anything
obvious.   I'm interested if anyone else has fought this problem and
what
you've done.

Thanks!

Rick


-
The information contained in this message is intended only for the
personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an
agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that you have received this document in error
and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of
this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately, and delete
the original message.


--
Met vriendelijke groeten/Kind regards

Remco Post
r.p...@plcs.nl
+31 6 24821 622


Re: Cloned Win servers and multiple backups

2009-05-05 Thread Huebschman, George J.
I had a problem like this where the builders were using a common image
template to build windows servers.  I had the good luck of them using an
obsolete client name.  I kept seeing this unregistered name pop up when
I queried for unregistered nodes.

I solved it by registering the node and locking it.
I accidentally noticed that the IP address of the node changed from time
to time.
You could try running an SQL query comparing the IP Address of the node
matches the ip address of the client server.

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Remco Post
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 10:53 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Cloned Win servers and multiple backups

On 5 mei 2009, at 16:37, Tyree, David wrote:

 I think this only work if you had open registration.


no, open registration and the default nodename are unrelated.

 -Original Message-
 From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf
 Of Len Boyle
 Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 9:09 AM
 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Cloned Win servers and multiple backups

 Rick,

 If your hostnames are unique in of themselves, you can leave the
 nodename out of the dsm.opt file. TSM will use the hostname for the
 tsm nodename.

 If you have clients with the name of xyz.abc.com and xyz.qxr.com then
 you would have a problem with this scheme.

 len

 -Original Message-
 From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf
 Of Richard Rhodes
 Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 8:12 AM
 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Subject: [ADSM-L] Cloned Win servers and multiple backups

 This is a strange problem.

 Once in a while, our Windows support team will clone a Windows server.
 The
 clone will have the exact same TSM setup as the source server.  I'm
 not familiar with the Win BA client, but it seems it always has a
 nodename line for the dsm.sys file, so the clone reports to TSM server

 that it's the same node as the clone source.  They both appear to
 respond to the same
 schedule.   This results in the new server performing good backups to
 the
 exact same node as the server that is the clone source.   The end
 result
 seems to be to two different servers happily  backing up the same TSM
 node.
 Obviously what we get is a useless mess.  When they clone a system
 they are supposed to use a source without a TSM setup, or,  clean out
 the TSM setup right away, but sometimes this doesn't happen.  I've
 tried to find a way to detect this from the TSM server, but I'm not
 coming up with anything
 obvious.   I'm interested if anyone else has fought this problem and
 what
 you've done.

 Thanks!

 Rick


 -
 The information contained in this message is intended only for the
 personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the
 reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent
 responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are
 hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that

 any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is

 strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,

 please notify us immediately, and delete the original message.

--
Met vriendelijke groeten/Kind regards

Remco Post
r.p...@plcs.nl
+31 6 24821 622

IMPORTANT:  E-mail sent through the Internet is not secure. Legg Mason 
therefore recommends that you do not send any confidential or sensitive 
information to us via electronic mail, including social security numbers, 
account numbers, or personal identification numbers. Delivery, and or timely 
delivery of Internet mail is not guaranteed. Legg Mason therefore recommends 
that you do not send time sensitive 
or action-oriented messages to us via electronic mail.

This message is intended for the addressee only and may contain privileged or 
confidential information. Unless you are the intended recipient, you may not 
use, copy or disclose to anyone any information contained in this message. If 
you have received this message in error, please notify the author by replying 
to this message and then kindly delete the message. Thank you.