Re: Follow-up on: Problems with Imation ultrium-2 (LTO-2) tapes?

2007-04-13 Thread Barnhart, Troy
When we first install our first 3584 three years ago, we bought around
200 Imation LTO2 tapes.  They lasted about a month and we also RMA'd 
them all...   

We've been on Maxell's for the last three years with maybe 10 tapes,
at the most, that have been bad from hundreds of tapes.  (And we're not
sure it was the tape that was bad, but maybe a bad drive causing it to
fail.)  We have a volume of about 1.2TB/day.

We've heard several similar stories as ours.  But, another local company
uses Imation in their 3584 (although 3494, not LTO2) with no problems.



Troy Barnhart, Sr. Systems Programmer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Regional Health, Inc.
353 Fairmont Boulevard
Rapid City, South Dakota 57701
PH: 605-716-8352 / FAX: 605-716-8302

-Original Message-
From: Kauffman, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 7:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ADSM-L] Follow-up on: Problems with Imation ultrium-2 (LTO-2) tapes?

Just for what it's worth - an observation.
I run about 2.4 TB of data through my 3584 on a daily process, between 
archives, 
backups, and off-site copies. I've had the same 4 cleaning tapes in place since 
my first 3584, with LTO-1 drives, just over 5 years now - and one tape has had 
a count of 11 uses. All from early days, using the tape to verify drives after 
maintenance. The count is now at 35; I've done 24 cleaning cycles this week on 
16 drives.  I have an RMA number.
Tom

-

Is there any particular firmware I should be running in my IBM drives to work 
with Imation tapes? We've been running Fuji and IBM with no issues for years, 
but we put a group of new Imation tapes in Friday - and I've had write errors 
on 4 of them so far, and a read error on one that caused the drive to go 
not-ready 
to the point it won't soft-reset. I am back-level on drive firmware (I don't 
usually fix anything that's working) so I thought I'd check that before I get 
an RMA from the vendor for the tapes.
TIA
Tom Kauffman
NIBCO Inc.
***Note: The information contained in this message, including any attachments, 
may be privileged, confidential, and protected from disclosure. If the reader 
of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent 
responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this 
communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication 
in error, please notify the Sender immediately by a "reply to sender only" 
message and destroy all electronic or paper copies of the communication, 
including any attachments.


Follow-up on: Problems with Imation ultrium-2 (LTO-2) tapes?

2007-04-13 Thread Kauffman, Tom
Just for what it's worth - an observation.

 

I run about 2.4 TB of data through my 3584 on a daily process, between
archives, backups, and off-site copies. I've had the same 4 cleaning
tapes in place since my first 3584, with LTO-1 drives, just over 5 years
now - and one tape has had a count of 11 uses. All from early days,
using the tape to verify drives after maintenance.

 

The count is now at 35; I've done 24 cleaning cycles this week on 16
drives.

 

I have an RMA number.

 

Tom

 

 

 -

 

Is there any particular firmware I should be running in my IBM drives to
work with Imation tapes? We've been running Fuji and IBM with no issues
for years, but we put a group of new Imation tapes in Friday - and I've
had write errors on 4 of them so far, and a read error on one that
caused the drive to go not-ready to the point it won't soft-reset. I am
back-level on drive firmware (I don't usaually fix anything that's
working) so I thought I'd check that before I get an RMA from the vendor
for the tapes.

 

TIA

 

Tom Kauffman

NIBCO Inc.


CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  This email and any attachments are for the 
exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient.  If you are not
the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in 
reliance upon this message. If you have received this in error, please 
notify us immediately by return email and promptly delete this message 
and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive  
attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
message.