Re: Missing MMC reports

2005-12-20 Thread Prather, Wanda
The .xml files are the customized templates for your daily reports.

If you are looking for the reports themselves, look for .htm files,
which also by default go into the /console directory.

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Large, M (Matthew)
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 4:29 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Missing MMC reports


Thanks for that Henrik,

I can see those files in the console dir, but no other xml files. Are
non-default reports added to these files or are more xml files
generated?

Thanks again,
Matthew

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Henrik Wahlstedt
Sent: 20 December 2005 08:26
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Missing MMC reports

Hi,

Take a look at thoose XML files. If I remeber it correctly all reports
are stored as XML files and thoose listed belows are the default
reports.
\...\tsm\console\default_rep_eng.xml and default_mon_eng.xml 

//Henrik

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Large, M (Matthew)
Sent: den 20 december 2005 09:17
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Missing MMC reports

Hi TSMers,

TSM 5.2.4.5 on W2K3

In a server move a colleague has mislaid my MMC reports - can any one
tell me what form these reports had before they were deleted? The system
was regularly backed up so I can restore them, if I know what to
restore!

Many thanks,
Matthew

TSM Consultant
ADMIN ITI
Rabobank International
1 Queenhithe, London
EC4V 3RL


_

This email (including any attachments to it) is confidential, legally
privileged, subject to copyright and is sent for the personal attention
of the intended recipient only. If you have received this email in
error, please advise us immediately and delete it. You are notified that
disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on
the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. Although we
have taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present in
this email, we cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage
arising from the viruses in this email or attachments. We exclude any
liability for the content of this email, or for the consequences of any
actions taken on the basis of the information provided in this email or
its attachments, unless that information is subsequently confirmed in
writing. If this email contains an offer, that should be considered as
an invitation to treat.
_


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of
the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not
the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and
delete this message.
Thank you.
_

This email (including any attachments to it) is confidential, legally
privileged, subject to copyright and is sent for the personal attention
of the intended recipient only. If you have received this email in
error, please advise us immediately and delete it. You are notified that
disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on
the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. Although we
have taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present in
this email, we cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage
arising from the viruses in this email or attachments. We exclude any
liability for the content of this email, or for the consequences of any
actions taken on the basis of the information provided in this email or
its attachments, unless that information is subsequently confirmed in
writing. If this email contains an offer, that should be considered as
an invitation to treat.
_


Re: Missing MMC reports

2005-12-20 Thread Lloyd Dieter
As Henrik indicated, you'll need those .xml files, and possibly any other
customized ones that you might have had.

Also, any customized reports will have ".ext" extensions...so you'll want
to restore those as well.

Mail Recipient lists are exported as ".rcp", if you had any of those
saved.

The scheduling stuff, I believe, is unfortunately saved in the registry,
so you will likely have to recreate that by hand.

Generally what I do is to install a fresh copy of the same version in the
same location, and then restore all contents of the "console" directory,
and restart the reporting service.

That's worked pretty well for me in the past.

Regards,

-Lloyd

On Tue, 20 Dec 2005 09:29:03 +
"Large, M (Matthew)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote thusly:

> Thanks for that Henrik,
>
> I can see those files in the console dir, but no other xml files. Are
> non-default reports added to these files or are more xml files
> generated?
>
> Thanks again,
> Matthew
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Henrik Wahlstedt
> Sent: 20 December 2005 08:26
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Missing MMC reports
>
> Hi,
>
> Take a look at thoose XML files. If I remeber it correctly all reports
> are stored as XML files and thoose listed belows are the default
> reports.
> \...\tsm\console\default_rep_eng.xml and default_mon_eng.xml
>
> //Henrik
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Large, M (Matthew)
> Sent: den 20 december 2005 09:17
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Missing MMC reports
>
> Hi TSMers,
>
> TSM 5.2.4.5 on W2K3
>
> In a server move a colleague has mislaid my MMC reports - can any one
> tell me what form these reports had before they were deleted? The system
> was regularly backed up so I can restore them, if I know what to
> restore!
>
> Many thanks,
> Matthew
>
> TSM Consultant
> ADMIN ITI
> Rabobank International
> 1 Queenhithe, London
> EC4V 3RL
>
>
> _
>
> This email (including any attachments to it) is confidential, legally
> privileged, subject to copyright and is sent for the personal attention
> of the intended recipient only. If you have received this email in
> error, please advise us immediately and delete it. You are notified that
> disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on
> the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. Although we
> have taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present in
> this email, we cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage
> arising from the viruses in this email or attachments. We exclude any
> liability for the content of this email, or for the consequences of any
> actions taken on the basis of the information provided in this email or
> its attachments, unless that information is subsequently confirmed in
> writing. If this email contains an offer, that should be considered as
> an invitation to treat.
> _
>
>
> ---
> The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
> intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of
> the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not
> the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and
> delete this message.
> Thank you.
> _
>
> This email (including any attachments to it) is confidential, legally
> privileged, subject to copyright and is sent for the personal attention
> of the intended recipient only. If you have received this email in
> error, please advise us immediately and delete it. You are notified that
> disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on
> the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. Although we
> have taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present in
> this email, we cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage
> arising from the viruses in this email or attachments. We exclude any
> liability for the content of this email, or for the consequences of any
> actions taken on the basis of the information provided in this email or
> its attachments, unless that information is subsequently confirmed in
> writing. If this email contains an offer, that should be considered as
> an invitation to
> treat._


--
--
Lloyd Dieter-   Systems Engineer
  IBM CATE Registered Linux User 285528
   SCS, Inc. http://www.scsinet.com   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Main:315-446-Direct:585-226-3289
--


Re: Missing MMC reports

2005-12-20 Thread Large, M (Matthew)
Thanks for that Henrik,

I can see those files in the console dir, but no other xml files. Are
non-default reports added to these files or are more xml files
generated?

Thanks again,
Matthew

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Henrik Wahlstedt
Sent: 20 December 2005 08:26
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Missing MMC reports

Hi,

Take a look at thoose XML files. If I remeber it correctly all reports
are stored as XML files and thoose listed belows are the default
reports.
\...\tsm\console\default_rep_eng.xml and default_mon_eng.xml 

//Henrik

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Large, M (Matthew)
Sent: den 20 december 2005 09:17
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Missing MMC reports

Hi TSMers,

TSM 5.2.4.5 on W2K3

In a server move a colleague has mislaid my MMC reports - can any one
tell me what form these reports had before they were deleted? The system
was regularly backed up so I can restore them, if I know what to
restore!

Many thanks,
Matthew

TSM Consultant
ADMIN ITI
Rabobank International
1 Queenhithe, London
EC4V 3RL


_

This email (including any attachments to it) is confidential, legally
privileged, subject to copyright and is sent for the personal attention
of the intended recipient only. If you have received this email in
error, please advise us immediately and delete it. You are notified that
disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on
the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. Although we
have taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present in
this email, we cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage
arising from the viruses in this email or attachments. We exclude any
liability for the content of this email, or for the consequences of any
actions taken on the basis of the information provided in this email or
its attachments, unless that information is subsequently confirmed in
writing. If this email contains an offer, that should be considered as
an invitation to treat.
_


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of
the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not
the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and
delete this message.
Thank you.
_

This email (including any attachments to it) is confidential, legally 
privileged, subject to copyright and is sent for the personal attention of the 
intended recipient only. If you have received this email in error, please 
advise us immediately and delete it. You are notified that disclosing, copying, 
distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this 
information is strictly prohibited. Although we have taken reasonable 
precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this email, we cannot accept 
responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the viruses in this email or 
attachments. We exclude any liability for the content of this email, or for the 
consequences of any actions taken on the basis of the information provided in 
this email or its attachments, unless that information is subsequently 
confirmed in writing. If this email contains an offer, that should be 
considered as an invitation to treat.
_


Re: Missing MMC reports

2005-12-20 Thread Henrik Wahlstedt
Hi,

Take a look at thoose XML files. If I remeber it correctly all reports
are stored as XML files and thoose listed belows are the default
reports.
\...\tsm\console\default_rep_eng.xml and default_mon_eng.xml 

//Henrik

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Large, M (Matthew)
Sent: den 20 december 2005 09:17
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Missing MMC reports

Hi TSMers,

TSM 5.2.4.5 on W2K3

In a server move a colleague has mislaid my MMC reports - can any one
tell me what form these reports had before they were deleted? The system
was regularly backed up so I can restore them, if I know what to
restore!

Many thanks,
Matthew

TSM Consultant
ADMIN ITI
Rabobank International
1 Queenhithe, London
EC4V 3RL


_

This email (including any attachments to it) is confidential, legally
privileged, subject to copyright and is sent for the personal attention
of the intended recipient only. If you have received this email in
error, please advise us immediately and delete it. You are notified that
disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on
the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. Although we
have taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present in
this email, we cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage
arising from the viruses in this email or attachments. We exclude any
liability for the content of this email, or for the consequences of any
actions taken on the basis of the information provided in this email or
its attachments, unless that information is subsequently confirmed in
writing. If this email contains an offer, that should be considered as
an invitation to treat.
_


---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.


Missing MMC reports

2005-12-20 Thread Large, M (Matthew)
Hi TSMers,

TSM 5.2.4.5 on W2K3

In a server move a colleague has mislaid my MMC reports - can any one
tell me what form these reports had before they were deleted? The system
was regularly backed up so I can restore them, if I know what to
restore!

Many thanks,
Matthew

TSM Consultant
ADMIN ITI
Rabobank International
1 Queenhithe, London
EC4V 3RL


_

This email (including any attachments to it) is confidential, legally 
privileged, subject to copyright and is sent for the personal attention of the 
intended recipient only. If you have received this email in error, please 
advise us immediately and delete it. You are notified that disclosing, copying, 
distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this 
information is strictly prohibited. Although we have taken reasonable 
precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this email, we cannot accept 
responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the viruses in this email or 
attachments. We exclude any liability for the content of this email, or for the 
consequences of any actions taken on the basis of the information provided in 
this email or its attachments, unless that information is subsequently 
confirmed in writing. If this email contains an offer, that should be 
considered as an invitation to treat.
_


MMC memory leak?

2005-08-26 Thread Large, M (Matthew)
Hi all,

I left the MMC console running overnight on a W2K box, monitoring three
TSM servers. 
At some point in the evening it had eaten up to 1 GB of memory, and
despite the box having 4 GB, the overnights ops wanted to kill it.

So, my question is, has this happened to you? Is there a memory leak in
the TSM MMC?

Thanks,
Matthew

TSM Consultant
ADMIN ITI
Rabobank International
1 Queenhithe, London
EC4V 3RL


_

This email (including any attachments to it) is confidential, legally 
privileged, subject to copyright and is sent for the personal attention of the 
intended recipient only. If you have received this email in error, please 
advise us immediately and delete it. You are notified that disclosing, copying, 
distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this 
information is strictly prohibited. Although we have taken reasonable 
precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this email, we cannot accept 
responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the viruses in this email or 
attachments. We exclude any liability for the content of this email, or for the 
consequences of any actions taken on the basis of the information provided in 
this email or its attachments, unless that information is subsequently 
confirmed in writing. If this email contains an offer, that should be 
considered as an invitation to treat.
_


Re: inc mmc question

2004-10-12 Thread Mark D. Rodriguez
CORP Rick Willmore wrote:
I have many windows 2000 clients that I wish to backup using an incremental backup and 
specifying a MMC that is different than one specified in my dsm.opt using the 
inclu/exclu options.  The idea is to have incrementals that are run daily and a 
seperate set of incrementals that are run monthly (different storage pool).  Anyone 
have any suggestions?  I am trying to avoid using an archive due to database size and 
the fact that the monthly incrementals are going to a tape pool that will remain in my 
library.
R.

Rick,
Have you considered doing image backups for your monthly backups?  There
are some limitations to this that you will need to look into, but having
a regularly scheduled image backup (which can use a different management
class, i.e. different retention values) has several benefits.  Rather
than go into all the ins and outs of image backups in this note I
suggest you take a look the admin guides and see if this might work for
you.  However, I will mention one plus to doing regular image backups,
when you have to do a full filespace restore it is much faster doing a
"image plus incrementals" restore rather than the conventional restore!
As an example, I am currently working with a customer that is setting up
an environment where they do regular incrementals 6 days a week using a
a MC that keeps 7 versions (most of the critical files change daily).
On the 7th day we take an image backup and that is set to keep 14
versions.  Therefore, we have a PIT restore to any day in the last week
with a daily resolution and PIT restore for anytime during the last 3
months with a weekly resolution.  For longer term we are also doing
quarterly archives that are kept for 3 years as well as a year end
archive that is kept forever.  This may not fit your needs exactly, but
you can see how flexible TSM is.
--
Regards,
Mark D. Rodriguez
President MDR Consulting, Inc.
===
MDR Consulting
The very best in Technical Training and Consulting.
IBM Advanced Business Partner
SAIR Linux and GNU Authorized Center for Education
IBM Certified Advanced Technical Expert, CATE
AIX Support and Performance Tuning, RS6000 SP, TSM/ADSM and Linux
Red Hat Certified Engineer, RHCE
===


Re: inc mmc question

2004-10-12 Thread CORP Rick Willmore
Steve,
Thanks.. I had a feeling it was going to be something along these lines (2 seperate 
opt files).  I think I will just stick to incs and archives.  Appreciate the 
information.  Maybe someday IBM will allow us to pass the MMC to an INC backup like 
they do with an ARCHIVE.

R.

-Original Message-
From: Steve Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 3:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: inc mmc question


Rick,

You need to define two nodes.  One for daily incrementals and one for dailies - you 
can't do it with one.
Use separate opt files for this.  I haven't done it yet,we are still in design phase,  
but I will be using two TSM server instances on the same hardware, one for monthlies 
and one for dailies

Steve

Steve Harris
AIX and TSM Admin
Queensland Health, Brisbane Australia
  

>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 13/10/2004 4:56:14 >>>
I have tested the backupset option and DAMN its slow.  I figured I would be stuck with 
the archive option but I thought I would throw it out to the group.  I didnt really 
have any intention of doing full+inc option.  I have daily incrementals with  no fulls 
and some archives for longer retention but I was hoping to increase my backup speed by 
using strictly incrementals.

R.

-Original Message-
From: Stapleton, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 11:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Subject: Re: inc mmc question


From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
Behalf Of CORP Rick Willmore
>I have many windows 2000 clients that I wish to backup using 
>an incremental backup and specifying a MMC that is different 
>than one specified in my dsm.opt using the inclu/exclu 
>options.  The idea is to have incrementals that are run daily 
>and a seperate set of incrementals that are run monthly 
>(different storage pool).  Anyone have any suggestions?  I am 
>trying to avoid using an archive due to database size and the 
>fact that the monthly incrementals are going to a tape pool 
>that will remain in my library.

You are trying to force TSM back into the unscalable, hard-to-manage,
full+incremental routine common with lesser backup packages. Trying to
do what you suggest will bump up your database size as fast (or faster)
than using an archive.

If you want a "snapshot" of the state of a server or two on a monthly
basis, consider using backupsets (which can come out of your library to
make room for more scratch tapes). If you want to do this with more than
a few servers, reconsider the archive idea. (And remember: you don't
need to archive every file on every machine. Find your data and archive
that only.)

--
Mark Stapleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Berbee Information Networks
Office 262.521.5627  



***
This email, including any attachments sent with it, is confidential and for the sole 
use of the intended recipient(s).  This confidentiality is not waived or lost, if you 
receive it and you are not the intended recipient(s), or if it is transmitted/received 
in error.

Any unauthorised use, alteration, disclosure, distribution or review of this email is 
prohibited.  It may be subject to a statutory duty of confidentiality if it relates to 
health service matters.

If you are not the intended recipient(s), or if you have received this email in error, 
you are asked to immediately notify the sender by telephone or by return email.  You 
should also delete this email and destroy any hard copies produced.
***


Re: inc mmc question

2004-10-12 Thread Steve Harris
Rick,

You need to define two nodes.  One for daily incrementals and one for dailies - you 
can't do it with one.
Use separate opt files for this.  I haven't done it yet,we are still in design phase,  
but I will be using two TSM server instances on the same hardware, one for monthlies 
and one for dailies

Steve

Steve Harris
AIX and TSM Admin
Queensland Health, Brisbane Australia
  

>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 13/10/2004 4:56:14 >>>
I have tested the backupset option and DAMN its slow.  I figured I would be stuck with 
the archive option but I thought I would throw it out to the group.  I didnt really 
have any intention of doing full+inc option.  I have daily incrementals with  no fulls 
and some archives for longer retention but I was hoping to increase my backup speed by 
using strictly incrementals.

R.

-Original Message-
From: Stapleton, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 11:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Subject: Re: inc mmc question


From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
Behalf Of CORP Rick Willmore
>I have many windows 2000 clients that I wish to backup using 
>an incremental backup and specifying a MMC that is different 
>than one specified in my dsm.opt using the inclu/exclu 
>options.  The idea is to have incrementals that are run daily 
>and a seperate set of incrementals that are run monthly 
>(different storage pool).  Anyone have any suggestions?  I am 
>trying to avoid using an archive due to database size and the 
>fact that the monthly incrementals are going to a tape pool 
>that will remain in my library.

You are trying to force TSM back into the unscalable, hard-to-manage,
full+incremental routine common with lesser backup packages. Trying to
do what you suggest will bump up your database size as fast (or faster)
than using an archive.

If you want a "snapshot" of the state of a server or two on a monthly
basis, consider using backupsets (which can come out of your library to
make room for more scratch tapes). If you want to do this with more than
a few servers, reconsider the archive idea. (And remember: you don't
need to archive every file on every machine. Find your data and archive
that only.)

--
Mark Stapleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Berbee Information Networks
Office 262.521.5627  



***
This email, including any attachments sent with it, is confidential and for the sole 
use of the intended recipient(s).  This confidentiality is not waived or lost, if you 
receive it and you are not the intended recipient(s), or if it is transmitted/received 
in error.

Any unauthorised use, alteration, disclosure, distribution or review of this email is 
prohibited.  It may be subject to a statutory duty of confidentiality if it relates to 
health service matters.

If you are not the intended recipient(s), or if you have received this email in error, 
you are asked to immediately notify the sender by telephone or by return email.  You 
should also delete this email and destroy any hard copies produced.
***


Re: inc mmc question

2004-10-12 Thread CORP Rick Willmore
I have tested the backupset option and DAMN its slow.  I figured I would be stuck with 
the archive option but I thought I would throw it out to the group.  I didnt really 
have any intention of doing full+inc option.  I have daily incrementals with  no fulls 
and some archives for longer retention but I was hoping to increase my backup speed by 
using strictly incrementals.

R.

-Original Message-
From: Stapleton, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 11:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: inc mmc question


From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
Behalf Of CORP Rick Willmore
>I have many windows 2000 clients that I wish to backup using 
>an incremental backup and specifying a MMC that is different 
>than one specified in my dsm.opt using the inclu/exclu 
>options.  The idea is to have incrementals that are run daily 
>and a seperate set of incrementals that are run monthly 
>(different storage pool).  Anyone have any suggestions?  I am 
>trying to avoid using an archive due to database size and the 
>fact that the monthly incrementals are going to a tape pool 
>that will remain in my library.

You are trying to force TSM back into the unscalable, hard-to-manage,
full+incremental routine common with lesser backup packages. Trying to
do what you suggest will bump up your database size as fast (or faster)
than using an archive.

If you want a "snapshot" of the state of a server or two on a monthly
basis, consider using backupsets (which can come out of your library to
make room for more scratch tapes). If you want to do this with more than
a few servers, reconsider the archive idea. (And remember: you don't
need to archive every file on every machine. Find your data and archive
that only.)

--
Mark Stapleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Berbee Information Networks
Office 262.521.5627  


Re: inc mmc question

2004-10-12 Thread Stapleton, Mark
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
Behalf Of CORP Rick Willmore
>I have many windows 2000 clients that I wish to backup using 
>an incremental backup and specifying a MMC that is different 
>than one specified in my dsm.opt using the inclu/exclu 
>options.  The idea is to have incrementals that are run daily 
>and a seperate set of incrementals that are run monthly 
>(different storage pool).  Anyone have any suggestions?  I am 
>trying to avoid using an archive due to database size and the 
>fact that the monthly incrementals are going to a tape pool 
>that will remain in my library.

You are trying to force TSM back into the unscalable, hard-to-manage,
full+incremental routine common with lesser backup packages. Trying to
do what you suggest will bump up your database size as fast (or faster)
than using an archive.

If you want a "snapshot" of the state of a server or two on a monthly
basis, consider using backupsets (which can come out of your library to
make room for more scratch tapes). If you want to do this with more than
a few servers, reconsider the archive idea. (And remember: you don't
need to archive every file on every machine. Find your data and archive
that only.)

--
Mark Stapleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Berbee Information Networks
Office 262.521.5627  


inc mmc question

2004-10-12 Thread CORP Rick Willmore
I have many windows 2000 clients that I wish to backup using an incremental backup and 
specifying a MMC that is different than one specified in my dsm.opt using the 
inclu/exclu options.  The idea is to have incrementals that are run daily and a 
seperate set of incrementals that are run monthly (different storage pool).  Anyone 
have any suggestions?  I am trying to avoid using an archive due to database size and 
the fact that the monthly incrementals are going to a tape pool that will remain in my 
library.


R.


MMC

2002-03-22 Thread mrkirra2001

Where can I find the Windows MMC plug-ins for TSM?
Can I use it to manage our TSM Server on OS/390?

Thanks

/gjs



Re: New install of TSM and MMC

2002-01-31 Thread Gill, Geoffrey L.

>Part of the goal of the 4.2 TSM management console was to reduce the
>overall number of separate user interfaces to TSM.   It did this by
>exploiting Windows and MMC to leverage and embed the function
>of the sever
>utilities, command line, web admin, and web client interfaces
>into a single
>user interface to help manage TSM across platforms.
>
>Regards,
>
>Mike Collins
>Tivoli Storage Product Architecture
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Does this mean we have something similar to the admin tool that used to come
with V3 of the client software that can be installed on a workstation and
access a TSM server on AIX?

Geoff Gill
TSM Administrator
NT Systems Support Engineer
SAIC
E-Mail:   [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Phone:  (858) 826-4062
Pager:   (888) 997-9614



Re: New install of TSM and MMC

2002-01-30 Thread E Mike Collins

 >>  Date:Tue, 29 Jan 2002 14:55:17 -0500
>> From:Bruce Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Subject: Re: New install of TSM and MMC
>>
>> Is this mgmt console only in ver 4.2 or is it also available for 4.1?
>>
>> Bruce Kamp

Bruce,

A TSM snap-in was included with 4.1 but its function was limited to the
local machine and was less than what shipped with the 4.1 TSM server
utilities. At 4.2 the TSM management console replaced the server utilities
and the previous snap-in and was extended to support TSM network resources
and the other capabilities mentioned in the last note.

Part of the goal of the 4.2 TSM management console was to reduce the
overall number of separate user interfaces to TSM.   It did this by
exploiting Windows and MMC to leverage and embed the function of the sever
utilities, command line, web admin, and web client interfaces into a single
user interface to help manage TSM across platforms.

Regards,

Mike Collins
Tivoli Storage Product Architecture
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: New install of TSM and MMC

2002-01-29 Thread Bruce Kamp

Is this mgmt console only in ver 4.2 or is it also available for 4.1?

Bruce Kamp

-Original Message-
From: E Mike Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 2:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: New install of TSM and MMC


>> Date:Mon, 28 Jan 2002 13:17:27 -
>> From:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Subject: New install of TSM
>>
>> Hi, I am currently implementin a TSM 4.2 on OS/390 to backup a
>> Windows NT / 2000, AIX and OS/2 environment but not the OS/390
>> environment. Can I use Microsoft Managent Console (MMC) or a Web
>> browser to administrate the clients, so that the administrator
>> doesn't have to access each client seperatly when changing what to
>> backup?  Where can I get the MMC snapin for TSM and how do I
>> implement it?
>>Thanks in Advance
>>
>>Pall B. Wolfram
>>System Administrator

Pall,

It seems like TSM client option sets and scheduling may be what you're
after.
You can access the TSM server through a web browser or through the TSM
management console to set these up.

The TSM management console is included with the TSM server and storage
agent packages for Windows. The online help includes implementation info.

Here's some general info on the TSM management console...

The TSM management console is a Microsoft Management Console (MMC)
consisting of several snapins such as the Event Viewer, Device
Manager, Removable Storage Management (RSM), Performance Monitor, and
Tivoli Storage Manager. The console is customizable and you can add or
remove any combination of snapins.  You can also add the TSM snapin to
other consoles or create new custom consoles consisting of the tools
administrators need to use as part of their jobs.

The TSM management console can present a view of your TSM
cross-platform resources which is similar in appearance to the network
neighborhood view in Windows Explorer.  You can view several screen
shots of the console at:


http://www.tivoli.com/products/documents/updates/storage_mgr_42_enhancements
.html

(scroll down to the Windows section and click on any of the preview links)

MMC runs on Windows and allows you to manage TSM resources on any TSM
supported platform. The extent to which you can manage TSM resources
depends on the platform.  For all TSM server platforms you can use the
embedded Web admin, console monitor, and command line interfaces. For
all TSM client platforms that support the web client you use the
embedded Web client.  Support is included to scan a network for active
TSM web clients and web administrators so that they can be added to
the view.

The Windows domain environment is further exploited so that in
addition to the web and command line interface support provided for
all TSM platforms you can also control the TSM Windows services across
your domain such as (TSM Scheduler, TSM Client Acceptor, TSM Journal
Engine, TSM Device driver, TSM Server, and TSM Storage Agent).  Along
with controlling services, you can edit options files and view log
files.  You can also see TSM version and device information. Support
is included to detect the TSM resources in your Windows domain so that
they can be added to the view.  Configuration wizards are included to
help you configure local TSM servers and storage agents.

We are interested in your feedback. If anyone has any comments on the
TSM management console please feel free to send them to me directly at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and I'll take them up with the appropriate teams.

Regards,

Mike Collins
Tivoli Storage Product Architecture
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: New install of TSM and MMC

2002-01-29 Thread E Mike Collins

>> Date:Mon, 28 Jan 2002 13:17:27 -
>> From:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Subject: New install of TSM
>>
>> Hi, I am currently implementin a TSM 4.2 on OS/390 to backup a
>> Windows NT / 2000, AIX and OS/2 environment but not the OS/390
>> environment. Can I use Microsoft Managent Console (MMC) or a Web
>> browser to administrate the clients, so that the administrator
>> doesn't have to access each client seperatly when changing what to
>> backup?  Where can I get the MMC snapin for TSM and how do I
>> implement it?
>>Thanks in Advance
>>
>>Pall B. Wolfram
>>System Administrator

Pall,

It seems like TSM client option sets and scheduling may be what you're
after.
You can access the TSM server through a web browser or through the TSM
management console to set these up.

The TSM management console is included with the TSM server and storage
agent packages for Windows. The online help includes implementation info.

Here's some general info on the TSM management console...

The TSM management console is a Microsoft Management Console (MMC)
consisting of several snapins such as the Event Viewer, Device
Manager, Removable Storage Management (RSM), Performance Monitor, and
Tivoli Storage Manager. The console is customizable and you can add or
remove any combination of snapins.  You can also add the TSM snapin to
other consoles or create new custom consoles consisting of the tools
administrators need to use as part of their jobs.

The TSM management console can present a view of your TSM
cross-platform resources which is similar in appearance to the network
neighborhood view in Windows Explorer.  You can view several screen
shots of the console at:

  http://www.tivoli.com/products/documents/updates/storage_mgr_42_enhancements.html

(scroll down to the Windows section and click on any of the preview links)

MMC runs on Windows and allows you to manage TSM resources on any TSM
supported platform. The extent to which you can manage TSM resources
depends on the platform.  For all TSM server platforms you can use the
embedded Web admin, console monitor, and command line interfaces. For
all TSM client platforms that support the web client you use the
embedded Web client.  Support is included to scan a network for active
TSM web clients and web administrators so that they can be added to
the view.

The Windows domain environment is further exploited so that in
addition to the web and command line interface support provided for
all TSM platforms you can also control the TSM Windows services across
your domain such as (TSM Scheduler, TSM Client Acceptor, TSM Journal
Engine, TSM Device driver, TSM Server, and TSM Storage Agent).  Along
with controlling services, you can edit options files and view log
files.  You can also see TSM version and device information. Support
is included to detect the TSM resources in your Windows domain so that
they can be added to the view.  Configuration wizards are included to
help you configure local TSM servers and storage agents.

We are interested in your feedback. If anyone has any comments on the
TSM management console please feel free to send them to me directly at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and I'll take them up with the appropriate teams.

Regards,

Mike Collins
Tivoli Storage Product Architecture
[EMAIL PROTECTED]