Re: AS/400 TSM client

2003-11-20 Thread Daniel Sparrman
Hi Zoltan

It's correct that you need either BRMS or Robot/SAVE. I would recommend 
using Robot/Save if you have the option, as the performance differences 
between BRMS and Robot/save is huge.

The information that there will be an native AS/400 TSM client is only a 
rumour. So I wouldnt rely on that information.

Best Regards

Daniel Sparrman
---
Daniel Sparrman
Exist i Stockholm AB
Propellervägen 6B
183 62 TÄBY
Växel: 08 - 754 98 00
Mobil: 070 - 399 27 51




Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2003-11-18 18:06
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager

 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: 
Subject:AS/400 TSM client


We have an AS/400 system we would like to backup with TSM.

We read that the OS/400 we have is downlevel so we have ordered and
scheduled an upgrade of the OS.

However, now there is the issue of BRMS !Is is absolutely required ?
When I read through some of the readme files, the only software
requirements is the OS/400 level ?

Any help in this area is greatly appreciated !


Re: AS/400 TSM client

2003-11-20 Thread Stapleton, Mark
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 19/11/2003 3:06:26 
We have an AS/400 system we would like to backup with TSM.
We read that the OS/400 we have is downlevel so we have ordered and
scheduled an upgrade of the OS.
However, now there is the issue of BRMS !Is is absolutely required ?
When I read through some of the readme files, the only software
requirements is the OS/400 level ?

From: Steve Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
As I understand it you need either BRMS or Robot/Save (a third part
product) to connect to TSM.  
The problem with BRMS is that it treats TSM as a virtual tape drive, so
a lot of TSM facilities are bypassed.  In particular BRMS can do
incremental backups, but TSM can only expire the resulting object when
the whole BRMS tape expires. 
You tend to move a lot more data that you would in a native TSM
environment. Also the experience of those on this list is that BRMS-TSM
backups are really slow. I can't speak about robot/save, as all I know
is its name.

There were strong rumours of an impending native AS400 client a while
back, but things have gone very quiet since. Any IBMers with knowledge
should feel free to jump in at this point.



All together now!
http://publib-b.boulder.ibm.com/Redbooks.nsf/RedpieceAbstracts/sg247031.
html?Open

--
Mark Stapleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])


Re: AS/400 TSM client

2003-11-18 Thread Steve Harris
Zoltan

As I understand it you need either BRMS or Robot/Save (a third part product) to 
connect to TSM.  
The problem with BRMS is that it treats TSM as a virtual tape drive, so a lot of TSM 
facilities are bypassed.  In particular BRMS can do incremental backups, but TSM can 
only expire the resulting object when the whole BRMS tape expires. 
You tend to move a lot more data that you would in a native TSM  environment.
Also the experience of those on this list is that BRMS-TSM backups are really slow.
I can't speak about robot/save, as all I know is its name.

There were strong rumours of an impending native AS400 client a while back, but things 
have gone very quiet since.
Any IBMers with knowledge should feel free to jump in at this point.

Regards

Steve Harris
AIX and TSM Admin
Queensland Health, Brisbane Australia

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 19/11/2003 3:06:26 
We have an AS/400 system we would like to backup with TSM.

We read that the OS/400 we have is downlevel so we have ordered and
scheduled an upgrade of the OS.

However, now there is the issue of BRMS !Is is absolutely required ?
When I read through some of the readme files, the only software
requirements is the OS/400 level ?

Any help in this area is greatly appreciated !



***
This email, including any attachments sent with it, is confidential and for the sole 
use of the intended recipients(s).  This confidentiality is not waived or lost, if you 
receive it and you are not the intended recipient(s), or if it is transmitted/received 
in error.

Any unauthorised use, alteration, disclosure, distribution or review of this email is 
prohibited.  It may be subject to a statutory duty of confidentiality if it relates to 
health service matters.

If you are not the intended recipients(s), or if you have received this e-mail in 
error, you are asked to immediately notify the sender by telephone or by return 
e-mail.  You should also delete this e-mail message and destroy any hard copies 
produced.
***


Re: AS/400 TSM

2002-03-11 Thread Henk ten Have

  I wrote:

 Does anyone has experience, i.e. right now, in using TSM for AS/400
 backup's? Is there a simple way to do that and what is the performance?

  Last week I heard there will be a AS/400 backupclient in TSM 5.1.
  Is that true Tivoli guru's?

  Cheers,
  Henk ten Have.



Re: AS/400 TSM

2002-03-11 Thread Del Hoobler

 Does anyone has experience, i.e. right now, in using TSM for AS/400
 backup's? Is there a simple way to do that and what is the
performance?

 Last week I heard there will be a AS/400 backupclient in TSM 5.1.
 Is that true Tivoli guru's?

This is not true.

We are planning for a 4.2.1 level of the TSM API for OS/400
to be available in the near future but not a client.

Thanks,

Del



Del Hoobler
IBM Corporation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

- Leave everything a little better than you found it.
- Smile a lot: it costs nothing and is beyond price.



Re: AS/400 TSM

2002-03-11 Thread Zlatko Krastev

THERE IS a TSM client for AS/400!
You can configure BRMS/400 to backup to TSM server instead to drive the
tape.

Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant



Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by:ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:

Subject:Re: AS/400  TSM

  I wrote:

 Does anyone has experience, i.e. right now, in using TSM for AS/400
 backup's? Is there a simple way to do that and what is the performance?

  Last week I heard there will be a AS/400 backupclient in TSM 5.1.
  Is that true Tivoli guru's?

  Cheers,
  Henk ten Have.



Re: AS/400 TSM

2002-03-11 Thread ARhoads

Hank,

I don't know what TSM 5.1 will bring but for now you have to either use
Robot/Save (3rd party) or BRMS.  Robot/Save will require enough local disk
space to backup the system to disk before it send it to TSM (you might be
able to do some break-down but we couldn't see a way on the particular
system we installed it on).  BRMS will only backup the data not the system.
Performance in either case was not very good.

Steffan
- Original Message -
From: Henk ten Have [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 5:31 AM
Subject: Re: AS/400  TSM


   I wrote:

  Does anyone has experience, i.e. right now, in using TSM for AS/400
  backup's? Is there a simple way to do that and what is the performance?

   Last week I heard there will be a AS/400 backupclient in TSM 5.1.
   Is that true Tivoli guru's?

   Cheers,
   Henk ten Have.



Re: AS/400 TSM

2002-03-11 Thread Pavan, Ron

Here is a little information that I had sent to someone else.  As far as the
AS400 to TSM backups, I feel that it works if you can through the hardware
(from the AS/400 side) at it.

Attached is timings from last night.  This will give you an idea of how
long transfer times are.  All of the timings in the list are backups through
BRMS directly to TSM and the times are from TSM.  There usually is a couple
of minutes on the AS400 side before the data transfer is started.  No matter
how you group the libraries in the BRMS groups, every library is considered
a separate object to TSM (that is why your see so many).  These timings
represent 186GB of data.  The last entry is a backup that we run that totals
71GB but because it requires the users to be down, we backup to a save file
and then let BRMS transfer that save file.

Our config is close.  The AS400 is an 830 with GB network card and the TSM
server is a dual processor Win2000 machine (cluster but running
Active/Passive) with 2GB of memory and GB network card.  All backups go
directly to diskpool and move to tapepool later in the morning.

-Original Message-
From: Henk ten Have [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 7:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: AS/400  TSM


Does anyone has experience, i.e. right now, in using TSM for AS/400
backup's? Is there a simple way to do that and what is the performance?

Cheers,
Henk ten Have (heard bad stories about BMRS and ADSM V3 API)



START_TIME  END_TIMEBYTES
2/14/02 7:01  PM2/14/02 7:34  PM16,985,715,451
2/14/02 7:34  PM2/14/02 7:42  PM3,989,351,339
2/14/02 7:42  PM2/14/02 7:52  PM5,453,819,899
2/14/02 7:53  PM2/14/02 7:53  PM20,415,371
2/14/02 7:53  PM2/14/02 7:53  PM5,981,643
2/14/02 7:53  PM2/14/02 7:54  PM30,416,139
2/14/02 7:55  PM2/14/02 7:55  PM150,191,947
2/14/02 7:57  PM2/14/02 7:57  PM174,999,275
2/14/02 7:59  PM2/14/02 7:59  PM186,946,123
2/14/02 7:59  PM2/14/02 7:59  PM225,355
2/14/02 7:59  PM2/14/02 7:59  PM8,219
2/14/02 7:59  PM2/14/02 8:03  PM2,158,463,499
2/14/02 8:04  PM2/14/02 8:04  PM4,187,147
2/14/02 8:04  PM2/14/02 8:05  PM647,326,011
2/14/02 8:05  PM2/14/02 8:10  PM2,659,125,099
2/14/02 8:10  PM2/14/02 8:10  PM7,366,427
2/14/02 8:11  PM2/14/02 8:11  PM57,181,851
2/14/02 8:11  PM2/14/02 8:11  PM2,450,027
2/14/02 10:55 PM2/14/02 10:56 PM219,668,875
2/14/02 10:56 PM2/14/02 10:57 PM54,785,099
2/14/02 10:57 PM2/14/02 10:57 PM17,510,603
2/14/02 10:57 PM2/14/02 11:05 PM2,578,627,243
2/14/02 11:05 PM2/14/02 11:06 PM167,743,483
2/14/02 11:06 PM2/14/02 11:18 PM3,435,457,435
2/14/02 11:18 PM2/14/02 11:18 PM44,218,939
2/14/02 11:20 PM2/14/02 11:25 PM2,027,498,795
2/14/02 11:27 PM2/14/02 11:27 PM56,264,123
2/14/02 11:28 PM2/14/02 11:28 PM78,465,755
2/14/02 11:28 PM2/14/02 11:28 PM303,195
2/14/02 11:29 PM2/14/02 11:29 PM30,977,435
2/14/02 11:30 PM2/14/02 11:50 PM4,518,020,027
2/15/02 12:04 AM2/15/02 12:10 AM2,538,460,251
2/15/02 12:11 AM2/15/02 12:12 AM645,445,499
2/15/02 12:13 AM2/15/02 12:13 AM108,148,523
2/15/02 12:14 AM2/15/02 12:15 AM212,015,675
2/15/02 12:15 AM2/15/02 12:16 AM158,725,995
2/15/02 12:16 AM2/15/02 12:17 AM393,520,971
2/15/02 12:18 AM2/15/02 12:18 AM66,039,563
2/15/02 12:19 AM2/15/02 12:19 AM182,459,915
2/15/02 12:20 AM2/15/02 12:20 AM24,102,667
2/15/02 12:20 AM2/15/02 12:21 AM186,728,987
2/15/02 12:21 AM2/15/02 12:22 AM79,801,387
2/15/02 12:22 AM2/15/02 12:23 AM515,558,299
2/15/02 12:24 AM2/15/02 12:25 AM674,181,851
2/15/02 12:26 AM2/15/02 12:27 AM497,666,699
2/15/02 12:28 AM2/15/02 12:29 AM238,846,923
2/15/02 12:29 AM2/15/02 12:37 AM3,432,999,227
2/15/02 12:38 AM2/15/02 12:38 AM177,207,563
2/15/02 12:40 AM2/15/02 12:40 AM168,407,211
2/15/02 12:42 AM2/15/02 12:45 AM1,205,644,699
2/15/02 12:47 AM2/15/02 12:51 AM1,381,119,211
2/15/02 12:53 AM2/15/02 12:54 AM790,245,771
2/15/02 12:56 AM2/15/02 1:05  AM4,059,123,259
2/15/02 1:07  AM2/15/02 1:19  AM5,250,809,451
2/15/02 1:21  AM2/15/02 1:46  AM9,320,322,683
2/15/02 1:47  AM2/15/02 2:15  AM9,264,398,619
2/15/02 2:17  AM2/15/02 2:37  AM4,828,752,891
2/15/02 2:38  AM2/15/02 2:43  AM   

Re: AS/400 TSM

2002-03-11 Thread Henk ten Have

  Steffan,

 I don't know what TSM 5.1 will bring but for now you have to either use
 Robot/Save (3rd party) or BRMS.  Robot/Save will require enough local disk
 space to backup the system to disk before it send it to TSM (you might be
 able to do some break-down but we couldn't see a way on the particular
 system we installed it on).  BRMS will only backup the data not the system.
 Performance in either case was not very good.

  Thanks. More people told me the performance isn't very good. Not to say
  poor/bad.

  Cheers,
  Henk (aka Hank)



Re: AS/400 TSM

2002-03-06 Thread Daniel Sparrman

Hi

There is a API for AS/400, but it requires for example RoboSave to work.

We have a AS/400 backing up to TSM (NSM) and 3583. It works perfect, but
the IBM guys had to set up the AS/400.
---
Daniel Sparrman
Exist i Stockholm AB
Bergkällavägen 31D
192 79 SOLLENTUNA
Växel: 08 - 754 98 00
Mobil: 070 - 399 27 51


   

Henk ten Have  

[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  

L   cc:   

Sent by: Subject: AS/400  TSM 

ADSM: Dist

Stor Manager  

[EMAIL PROTECTED]  

RIST.EDU  

   

   

2002-03-06 

16:47  

Please 

respond to 

ADSM: Dist

Stor Manager  

   

   





Does anyone has experience, i.e. right now, in using TSM for AS/400
backup's? Is there a simple way to do that and what is the performance?

Cheers,
Henk ten Have (heard bad stories about BMRS and ADSM V3 API)





Re: AS/400 TSM

2002-03-06 Thread Bill Mansfield

No experience, but there's a (fairly) recent redpiece: Backup Recovery and
Media Services for OS/400 More Practical Information REDP0508.



_
William Mansfield
Senior Consultant
Solution Technology, Inc





Henk ten Have [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
03/06/2002 09:47 AM
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager


To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:AS/400  TSM


Does anyone has experience, i.e. right now, in using TSM for AS/400
backup's? Is there a simple way to do that and what is the performance?

Cheers,
Henk ten Have (heard bad stories about BMRS and ADSM V3 API)



Re: AS/400 TSM

2002-03-06 Thread Martin, Jon R.

Henk,

This past summer we added 4 AS/400s to our TSM environment.  We
are running TSM v 3.7.2 on AIX v4.3.3.  Our Library is a SCSI connected
3575.  There are redbooks out there with great information on setting up
your management class, and tips for setting up BRMS on the AS/400.  We found
two limitations.

1  BRMS does all management and expiration of the files stored in TSM.

- For us this meant trusting the AS/400 administrators were properly
managing BRMS.  If they were not it would have uncontrollable results on the
TSM server for us.

2  The backup times were extremely slow.

- I looked somewhat extensively but could not find any reasons for
this.  The backups were done through Gigabit Ethernet.  I found some
postings which indicating there were known performance problems, but nothing
to indicate a solution.

In the end we removed the AS/400's from our environment.  Someday
when we upgrade and have a 3494 library we try to add the AS/400s to TSM
again, but this time backing up through Fibre.

Try this link for good information.

http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/eserver/iseries/service/brms/adsmtips.htm


Thanks,
Jon Martin

-Original Message-
From: Henk ten Have [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 10:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: AS/400  TSM


Does anyone has experience, i.e. right now, in using TSM for AS/400
backup's? Is there a simple way to do that and what is the performance?

Cheers,
Henk ten Have (heard bad stories about BMRS and ADSM V3 API)



Re: AS/400 TSM

2002-03-06 Thread Henk ten Have

  Jon, thanks for your answers:

 1  BRMS does all management and expiration of the files stored in TSM.

 2  The backup times were extremely slow.

  This doesn't look something you like to deal with...

 In the end we removed the AS/400's from our environment.  Someday
 when we upgrade and have a 3494 library we try to add the AS/400s to TSM
 again, but this time backing up through Fibre.

  Last question: how do you backup your AS/400 machines now and how is the
  performance?

  Cheers,
  Henk ten Have.



Re: AS/400 TSM

2002-03-06 Thread Henk ten Have

  Daniel,

 We have a AS/400 backing up to TSM (NSM) and 3583. It works perfect, but
 the IBM guys had to set up the AS/400.

  Any idea what the IBM guys did set up? I don't suppose it's something
  magic?

  Cheers,
  Henk ten Have.