Re: Audit License Running long

[Tomáš Hrouda]

Didn't you change the AUDITSTORAGE key in DSMSERV.OPT to YES? If so, your
server is computing summary for Q AUDITOCC command during audit.

Tom

> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Gill, Geoffrey L.
> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 5:38 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Audit License Running long
>
>
> Audit license usually takes seconds to run but tonight it has been running
> for over an hour. Anyone might have some insight as to why this unusual
> change? Everything looks as normal as it ever does from what I can tell.
>
> TSM Server 5.1.6.2 on AIX 4.3.3
>
> Geoff Gill
> TSM Administrator
> NT Systems Support Engineer
> SAIC
> E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Phone:  (858) 826-4062
> Pager:   (877) 905-7154

Re: audit license

[Andrew Raibeck]

The AUDITSTORAGE parameter goes in your server options file (such as
dsmserv.opt). The default value is YES. If you specify AUDITSTORAGE NO in
the server options file, then AUDIT LICENSES won't audit storage.

You can use the QUERY OPTION (abbreviated to Q OPT if you wish) command to
determine the current AUDITSTORAGE setting. If you need to change it, you
have to put AUDITSTORAGE NO in your server options file, then stop and
restart the TSM server.

Regards,

Andy

Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/IBM@IBMUS
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The command line is your friend.
"Good enough" is the enemy of excellence.




Joni Moyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
03/22/2002 06:40
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"


To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:audit license



I was going to do an audit license over Easter vacation to update the
status of my licenses.  I don't want to audit the storage so I was going
to
do the command:

AUDIT LICENSE AUDITSTORAGE

I was just wondering if the syntax is correct?  I looked it up in the
book,
but it doesn't really give the format, it just states that the
administrator can use the AUDITSTORAGE parameter to exclude auditing the
storage.

Thanks

Joni Moyer
Associate Systems Programmer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(717)975-8338

Re: audit license

[Kent Monthei]

Do a 'help setopt' on the TSM Server.  You'll see 'NoAuditStorage'.  A 'q
opt' reports the current option value in the 2nd column.  Set it before
running 'Audit License'.  It's not part of the 'Audit License' command.





"Joni Moyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
22-Mar-2002 08:40
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>




To: ADSM-L

cc:
Subject:audit license

I was going to do an audit license over Easter vacation to update the
status of my licenses.  I don't want to audit the storage so I was going
to
do the command:

AUDIT LICENSE AUDITSTORAGE

I was just wondering if the syntax is correct?  I looked it up in the
book,
but it doesn't really give the format, it just states that the
administrator can use the AUDITSTORAGE parameter to exclude auditing the
storage.

Thanks

Joni Moyer
Associate Systems Programmer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(717)975-8338

Re: audit license

[Wholey, Joseph (TGA\\MLOL)]

How about "Audit Lic"...

-Original Message-
From: Joni Moyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 8:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: audit license


I was going to do an audit license over Easter vacation to update the
status of my licenses.  I don't want to audit the storage so I was going to
do the command:

AUDIT LICENSE AUDITSTORAGE

I was just wondering if the syntax is correct?  I looked it up in the book,
but it doesn't really give the format, it just states that the
administrator can use the AUDITSTORAGE parameter to exclude auditing the
storage.

Thanks

Joni Moyer
Associate Systems Programmer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(717)975-8338

Re: AUDIT LICENSE and Occupancy tables

[Bill Mansfield]

Yes, q occ returns good info without the license audit.  You still need to
run the audit to use q auditocc.  I prefer q auditocc for some things.



_
William Mansfield
Senior Consultant
Solution Technology, Inc




"Prather, Wanda"
  cc:
Sent by: "ADSM: Subject: AUDIT LICENSE and Occupancy 
tables
Dist Stor
Manager"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
T.EDU>


10/23/2001 02:12
PM
Please respond
to "ADSM: Dist
Stor Manager"






I thought I had read somewhere that it was no longer necessary in TSM 4.1.x
to do an AUDIT LICENSE in order to get good information back with a Q OCC,
or with a SELECT from the occupancy tables.

Is that so, or did I just imagine this?  Can't find any releated doc now,
or
remember where I saw it (if I really did!)...

Re: AUDIT LICENSE and Occupancy tables

[Bill Colwell]

Wanda,

You don't need to do an audit license to get good data back from
'q occ' or 'select * from occupancy ...'.  But there is another table
in the server called auditoccupancy and you do need to do audit license
to get current data into it.

I always use the occupancy table because it reports by filespace and
storagepool whereas auditoccupancy adds all the filespaces together.
If you only use the occupancy table you can speed up the audit license
process by adding 'auditstorage no' to the server options file.

Hope this helps,


--
--
Bill Colwell
C. S. Draper Lab
Cambridge, Ma.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 10/23/01
   at 05:10 PM, "Prather, Wanda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

>I thought I had read somewhere that it was no longer necessary in TSM 4.1.x
>to do an AUDIT LICENSE in order to get good information back with a Q OCC,
>or with a SELECT from the occupancy tables.

>Is that so, or did I just imagine this?  Can't find any releated doc now, or
>remember where I saw it (if I really did!)...