VMS Client Performance

2001-12-20 Thread Paul Bestow

Hello Everybody,

Does anyone out there run the a similar configuration that may be able to
help us with a few performance options?

TSM Server 4.1.3 running on NT4 Enterprise Edition SP6a

ABC Backup Client 3.1.0.1 running on OPEN VMS 7.2-2

Basically we backed up a 3.5gb file to disk which only took around 5 mins
but on the restore it took just over 2 hours.

Has anyone got any ideas for the options file i.e. TCPWINDOWSIZE or
TCPBUFFSIZE as we have left them set to the default settings which was
TCPWINDOWSIZE 63 and TCPBUFFSIZE 32.

Thanks in advance

Paul




http://www.phoenixitgroup.com
**Internet Email Confidentiality Footer***

Phoenix IT Group Limited is registered in England and Wales under company
number 3476115.  Registered Office: Technology House, Hunsbury Hill Avenue,
Northampton, NN4 8QS

Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not
relate to the official business of our firm shall be understood as neither
given nor endorsed by it.

No contracts may be concluded on behalf of our firm by means of email
communications.

Confidentiality: Confidential information may be contained in this message.
If you are not the recipient indicated (or responsible for delivery of the
message to such person), you may not take any action based on it, nor should
you copy or show this to anyone; please reply to this email and highlight
the error to the sender, then delete the message from your system.

Monitoring of Messages: Please note that we reserve the right to monitor and
intercept emails sent and received on our network.
Warning:  Internet email is not 100% secure. We ask you to understand and
observe this lack of security when emailing us. We do not accept
responsibility for changes made to this message after it was sent

Viruses: Although we have taken steps to ensure that this email and any
attachments are free from any virus, we advise that in keeping with good
computing practice the recipient should ensure they are actually virus free.



Re: VMS Client Performance

2001-12-20 Thread Kelly Lipp

Paul,

I've forwarded this along to the developer to get his ideas.  It would
appear that there is some network issue causing this.  The backup time looks
good, obviously.  When we start to troubleshoot something like this we'll
try a bi-directional ftp of a file.  There might be some strange routing in
your IP network.  While we wait for a response, can you try an ftp from the
TSM server to the OpenVMS system and see what kind of time you get?  Try it
the other way around and compare.  Obviously, the times should be close to
the same.  Choose a reasonably large file for the test.

Thanks,

Kelly J. Lipp
Storage Solutions Specialists, Inc.
PO Box 51313
Colorado Springs, CO 80949
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.storsol.com or www.storserver.com
(719)531-5926
Fax: (240)539-7175


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Paul Bestow
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 4:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: VMS Client Performance


Hello Everybody,

Does anyone out there run the a similar configuration that may be able to
help us with a few performance options?

TSM Server 4.1.3 running on NT4 Enterprise Edition SP6a

ABC Backup Client 3.1.0.1 running on OPEN VMS 7.2-2

Basically we backed up a 3.5gb file to disk which only took around 5 mins
but on the restore it took just over 2 hours.

Has anyone got any ideas for the options file i.e. TCPWINDOWSIZE or
TCPBUFFSIZE as we have left them set to the default settings which was
TCPWINDOWSIZE 63 and TCPBUFFSIZE 32.

Thanks in advance

Paul




http://www.phoenixitgroup.com
**Internet Email Confidentiality Footer***

Phoenix IT Group Limited is registered in England and Wales under company
number 3476115.  Registered Office: Technology House, Hunsbury Hill Avenue,
Northampton, NN4 8QS

Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not
relate to the official business of our firm shall be understood as neither
given nor endorsed by it.

No contracts may be concluded on behalf of our firm by means of email
communications.

Confidentiality: Confidential information may be contained in this message.
If you are not the recipient indicated (or responsible for delivery of the
message to such person), you may not take any action based on it, nor should
you copy or show this to anyone; please reply to this email and highlight
the error to the sender, then delete the message from your system.

Monitoring of Messages: Please note that we reserve the right to monitor and
intercept emails sent and received on our network.
Warning:  Internet email is not 100% secure. We ask you to understand and
observe this lack of security when emailing us. We do not accept
responsibility for changes made to this message after it was sent

Viruses: Although we have taken steps to ensure that this email and any
attachments are free from any virus, we advise that in keeping with good
computing practice the recipient should ensure they are actually virus free.



Re: VMS Client Performance

2001-12-20 Thread Kelly Lipp

Paul, Kelly -

If the FTP times are similar, then another possible cause of this is that
the output disk has file highwater marking turned on (this is the default).
Or, the output disk is very fragmented and nearly full.  For a restore of
such a large file, either of these issues can be a significant.   Another
item to check is whether the file is marked for contiguous restore or
contiguous best try (ABC SHOW BACKUP file /FULL will show this).  If so,
the restore can take much longer than otherwise unless the disk has very
large chunks of free space.

I would expect the problem to be either some network issue (one should check
the OpenVMS LAN device via LANCP SHOW DEV/COUNTER and possibly LANCP SHOW
DEV/CHAR) or the above-mentioned disk issues.

To change the file highwater marking:

$ set volume/nohighwater device:

Note that you probably want to reinstate file high water marking after the
restore.  It is part of OpenVMS file security and helps prevent disk
scavenging.

To check the fragmentation state of the disk:

1. Install Compaq's DFO from the condist or the DFU utility from the OpenVMS
freeware CD.

2. Run DFO's file analysis command, which does not require a license. Or,
run the DFU disk analysis command(s).

Finally, it would be interesting to see the summary produced by ABC for the
restore.  The summary data rate would give us an idea about whether the
bottleneck is network (data rate slow) or disk (data rate fast, but
wall-clock time long).  In the disk case, the problem will be in file
allocation not the data transfer portion.  For degenerate cases, file
allocation can take an enormously long time.

So, there are two possible bottlenecks: Network or Disk.

Oh, almost forgot.  Typically (unless drastically changed) the TCPwindowsize
and TCPbuff settings have only marginal affect.  I recommend leaving them
alone.  This is especially true because we see reasonable performance during
the backup.

Regards,
Steve

Kelly J. Lipp
Storage Solutions Specialists, Inc.
PO Box 51313
Colorado Springs, CO 80949
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.storsol.com or www.storserver.com
(719)531-5926
Fax: (240)539-7175


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Paul Bestow
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 4:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: VMS Client Performance


Hello Everybody,

Does anyone out there run the a similar configuration that may be able to
help us with a few performance options?

TSM Server 4.1.3 running on NT4 Enterprise Edition SP6a

ABC Backup Client 3.1.0.1 running on OPEN VMS 7.2-2

Basically we backed up a 3.5gb file to disk which only took around 5 mins
but on the restore it took just over 2 hours.

Has anyone got any ideas for the options file i.e. TCPWINDOWSIZE or
TCPBUFFSIZE as we have left them set to the default settings which was
TCPWINDOWSIZE 63 and TCPBUFFSIZE 32.

Thanks in advance

Paul




http://www.phoenixitgroup.com
**Internet Email Confidentiality Footer***

Phoenix IT Group Limited is registered in England and Wales under company
number 3476115.  Registered Office: Technology House, Hunsbury Hill Avenue,
Northampton, NN4 8QS

Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not
relate to the official business of our firm shall be understood as neither
given nor endorsed by it.

No contracts may be concluded on behalf of our firm by means of email
communications.

Confidentiality: Confidential information may be contained in this message.
If you are not the recipient indicated (or responsible for delivery of the
message to such person), you may not take any action based on it, nor should
you copy or show this to anyone; please reply to this email and highlight
the error to the sender, then delete the message from your system.

Monitoring of Messages: Please note that we reserve the right to monitor and
intercept emails sent and received on our network.
Warning:  Internet email is not 100% secure. We ask you to understand and
observe this lack of security when emailing us. We do not accept
responsibility for changes made to this message after it was sent

Viruses: Although we have taken steps to ensure that this email and any
attachments are free from any virus, we advise that in keeping with good
computing practice the recipient should ensure they are actually virus free.



Re: VMS Client Performance

2001-12-20 Thread Dearman, Richard

You know I had a problem similar to this.  We were doing a large restore of
a system disk about 50,000 files 1.6Gb.  It took about 20 minutes to build
the file list.  When it started restoring it restored 1Gb fast and then the
session hung for 45minutes.  So I killed the session from TSM and it
reconnected and started moving files again from where it left off but after
about 30Mb more it hung again.  So I killed the session from TSM again and
it reconnected and did another 10Mb and hung again.  This happened about 5
times before it completed.  I don't understand why it would hang.  It wasn't
waiting for a tape mount, it would just sit there.  It took us 2hours to
restore 1.6GB.

Richard

-Original Message-
From: Kelly Lipp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 2:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: VMS Client Performance


Paul, Kelly -

If the FTP times are similar, then another possible cause of this is that
the output disk has file highwater marking turned on (this is the default).
Or, the output disk is very fragmented and nearly full.  For a restore of
such a large file, either of these issues can be a significant.   Another
item to check is whether the file is marked for contiguous restore or
contiguous best try (ABC SHOW BACKUP file /FULL will show this).  If so,
the restore can take much longer than otherwise unless the disk has very
large chunks of free space.

I would expect the problem to be either some network issue (one should check
the OpenVMS LAN device via LANCP SHOW DEV/COUNTER and possibly LANCP SHOW
DEV/CHAR) or the above-mentioned disk issues.

To change the file highwater marking:

$ set volume/nohighwater device:

Note that you probably want to reinstate file high water marking after the
restore.  It is part of OpenVMS file security and helps prevent disk
scavenging.

To check the fragmentation state of the disk:

1. Install Compaq's DFO from the condist or the DFU utility from the OpenVMS
freeware CD.

2. Run DFO's file analysis command, which does not require a license. Or,
run the DFU disk analysis command(s).

Finally, it would be interesting to see the summary produced by ABC for the
restore.  The summary data rate would give us an idea about whether the
bottleneck is network (data rate slow) or disk (data rate fast, but
wall-clock time long).  In the disk case, the problem will be in file
allocation not the data transfer portion.  For degenerate cases, file
allocation can take an enormously long time.

So, there are two possible bottlenecks: Network or Disk.

Oh, almost forgot.  Typically (unless drastically changed) the TCPwindowsize
and TCPbuff settings have only marginal affect.  I recommend leaving them
alone.  This is especially true because we see reasonable performance during
the backup.

Regards,
Steve

Kelly J. Lipp
Storage Solutions Specialists, Inc.
PO Box 51313
Colorado Springs, CO 80949
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.storsol.com or www.storserver.com
(719)531-5926
Fax: (240)539-7175


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Paul Bestow
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 4:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: VMS Client Performance


Hello Everybody,

Does anyone out there run the a similar configuration that may be able to
help us with a few performance options?

TSM Server 4.1.3 running on NT4 Enterprise Edition SP6a

ABC Backup Client 3.1.0.1 running on OPEN VMS 7.2-2

Basically we backed up a 3.5gb file to disk which only took around 5 mins
but on the restore it took just over 2 hours.

Has anyone got any ideas for the options file i.e. TCPWINDOWSIZE or
TCPBUFFSIZE as we have left them set to the default settings which was
TCPWINDOWSIZE 63 and TCPBUFFSIZE 32.

Thanks in advance

Paul




http://www.phoenixitgroup.com
**Internet Email Confidentiality Footer***

Phoenix IT Group Limited is registered in England and Wales under company
number 3476115.  Registered Office: Technology House, Hunsbury Hill Avenue,
Northampton, NN4 8QS

Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not
relate to the official business of our firm shall be understood as neither
given nor endorsed by it.

No contracts may be concluded on behalf of our firm by means of email
communications.

Confidentiality: Confidential information may be contained in this message.
If you are not the recipient indicated (or responsible for delivery of the
message to such person), you may not take any action based on it, nor should
you copy or show this to anyone; please reply to this email and highlight
the error to the sender, then delete the message from your system.

Monitoring of Messages: Please note that we reserve the right to monitor and
intercept emails sent and received on our network.
Warning:  Internet email is not 100% secure. We ask you to understand and
observe this lack of security when emailing us. We do not accept
responsibility