New TSM 5.3.2 install on Windows 2003 Storage Server

2006-03-01 Thread Jay Cunningham
Fellow *SMers:



I have completed my first installation of TSM for a public school system and
would welcome any comments or recommendations as to how things could be
improved.  Initially, I was a little overwhelmed with the amount of work
required to get this all set up and the way I bid this, was to charge the
customer ONLY for the few days I spent on site.  Since then, I've made a
considerable investment to get down the "learning curve."  I had no
assistance or training other than what was in IBM's online documentation.  I
opened two PMRs with IBM on specific issues.



Here's a description of what has been done so far:



There is a single IBM eServer x226 (MS Windows Storage Server 2003 with SP1)
with 5 ea. 250 GB SATA drives attached via SCSI controller to an IBM 3582
Tape Library.  The server is configured with (only) a 10 GB RAID system
partition and a RAID 5 virtual disk which I've partitioned into two volumes.
The tape library has two drives and 18 LTO 200/400GB tapes loaded.  TSM
5.3.2 was installed and the 5.3.2.2 fix was applied.  I've been using the
Windows management console and ISC to configure and monitor TSM.



I set up the following policy domains:



STANDARD  - the default policy domain

REMOTE_BU - for remote clients over slower links

MS_SQL_DOMAIN - for backing up a couple servers with MS SQL databases



My storage hierarchy is as follows:



ARCHIVEPOOL DISK- - migrates to - >   DISKPOOL

BACKUPPOOL  DISK- - migrates to - >   DISKPOOL

COPYPOOL  LTOCLASS1

DISKPOOLDISK- - migrates to - >   LTOPOOL1

LTOPOOL1  LTOCLASS1

SPACEMGPOOL DISK



My server is using TCP/IP and listening on port 1500.  Clients can be
accessed over port 1581.



I've defined the following schedules:



POLICY DOMAIN  SCHEDULE NAME  DESCRIPTION

-     

STANDARD   DAILY_INCR Daily incremental backup

   NIGHT_BU   Nightly Client Backup

   REMOTE_FULLFull backup from Remote site

   WEEKLY_INCRWeekly incremental backup



REMOTE_BU DOMAIN   AFTERHOURS_BU  Backup after hours



MS_SQL_DOMAIN  RENAISSANCE_BU Renaissance DB Backup



There are 15 clients including Windows 2003 and Netware 6.5 servers.  Two of
the Windows servers also have MS SQL databases to back up.



Issues:

---

One issue I'm trying to come to terms with is how to assign backups to
storage pools.  I've got most of the backups going to the DISKPOOL and
migrating to the LTOPOOL1.  Within LTOPOOL1 I have 18 volumes (tapes).



Should I divide the tape volumes into LTOPOOL1 and COPYPOOL then dedicate
individual tape volumes to each server or should I let TSM handle that?
Then check out the tapes assigned to the COPYPOOL for taking offsite on a
regular basis?



Thanks in advance,

Jay Cunningham

Netuit, Inc.

Durham, NC


New TSM 5.3.2 install on Windows 2003 Storage Server

2006-03-01 Thread Jay Cunningham
Fellow *SMers:



I have completed my first installation of TSM for a public school system and
would welcome any comments or recommendations as to how things could be
improved.  Initially, I was a little overwhelmed with the amount of work
required to get this all set up and the way I bid this, was to charge the
customer ONLY for the few days I spent on site.  Since then, I've made a
considerable investment to get down the "learning curve."  I had no
assistance or training other than what was in IBM's online documentation.  I
opened two PMRs with IBM on specific issues.



Here's a description of what has been done so far:



There is a single IBM eServer x226 (MS Windows Storage Server 2003 with SP1)
with 5 ea. 250 GB SATA drives attached via SCSI controller to an IBM 3582
Tape Library.  The server is configured with (only) a 10 GB RAID system
partition and a RAID 5 virtual disk which I've partitioned into two volumes.
The tape library has two drives and 18 LTO 200/400GB tapes loaded.  TSM
5.3.2 was installed and the 5.3.2.2 fix was applied.  I've been using the
Windows management console and ISC to configure and monitor TSM.



I set up the following policy domains:



STANDARD  - the default policy domain

REMOTE_BU - for remote clients over slower links

MS_SQL_DOMAIN - for backing up a couple servers with MS SQL databases



My storage hierarchy is as follows:



ARCHIVEPOOL DISK- - migrates to - >   DISKPOOL

BACKUPPOOL  DISK- - migrates to - >   DISKPOOL

COPYPOOL  LTOCLASS1

DISKPOOLDISK- - migrates to - >   LTOPOOL1

LTOPOOL1  LTOCLASS1

SPACEMGPOOL DISK



My server is using TCP/IP and listening on port 1500.  Clients can be
accessed over port 1581.



I've defined the following schedules:



POLICY DOMAIN  SCHEDULE NAME  DESCRIPTION

-     

STANDARD   DAILY_INCR Daily incremental backup

   NIGHT_BU   Nightly Client Backup

   REMOTE_FULLFull backup from Remote site

   WEEKLY_INCRWeekly incremental backup



REMOTE_BU DOMAIN   AFTERHOURS_BU  Backup after hours



MS_SQL_DOMAIN  RENAISSANCE_BU Renaissance DB Backup



There are 15 clients including Windows 2003 and Netware 6.5 servers.  Two of
the Windows servers also have MS SQL databases to back up.



Issues:

---

One issue I'm trying to come to terms with is how to assign backups to
storage pools.  I've got most of the backups going to the DISKPOOL and
migrating to the LTOPOOL1.  Within LTOPOOL1 I have 18 volumes (tapes).



Should I divide the tape volumes into LTOPOOL1 and COPYPOOL then dedicate
individual tape volumes to each server or should I let TSM handle that?
Then check out the tapes assigned to the COPYPOOL for taking offsite on a
regular basis?



Thanks in advance,

Jay


Re: Windows 2003 Storage Server

2004-08-26 Thread TSM_User
I have customers running it on Dell NAS.  It works fine for them as well.  We have 
noticed that the TSM client can scan more objects per hour on Windows 2003 NAS than on 
the exact same hardware running Windows 2003.  It seems the same optimization made for 
file server also helps the TSM client.  This Dual CPU Windows 2003 NAS scans around 
over 2 million objects per hour.



Imre Kloknicer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,

Is Windows 2003 Storage Server supported by TSM? Is there anyone who
backs up data stored on a NAS with Windows 2003 Storage Server? I'm
looking for some experience but I didn't really find anything on the
net.

Regards,
Imre


-
Do you Yahoo!?
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone.


Re: Windows 2003 Storage Server

2004-08-26 Thread Doug Thorneycroft
Yes, I'm running ITSM 5.2.10 Client on an HP NAS.
It is working just like any other Client. 

Doug Thorneycroft
County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County
(562) 699-7411 Ext. 1058
FAX (562) 699-6756
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Imre Kloknicer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2004 6:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Windows 2003 Storage Server


Hi,

Is Windows 2003 Storage Server supported by TSM? Is there anyone who
backs up data stored on a NAS with Windows 2003 Storage Server? I'm
looking for some experience but I didn't really find anything on the
net.

Regards,
Imre


Windows 2003 Storage Server

2004-08-26 Thread Imre Kloknicer
Hi,

Is Windows 2003 Storage Server supported by TSM? Is there anyone who
backs up data stored on a NAS with Windows 2003 Storage Server? I'm
looking for some experience but I didn't really find anything on the
net.

Regards,
Imre